Comment on “New Experimental Data and Mechanistic Studies on the

Instituto de Química, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Av. Athos da Silveira Ramos, 149, Centro de Tecnologia, Bloco A, 21941-909 Rio de Janei...
1 downloads 0 Views 72KB Size
7652

J. Phys. Chem. A 2010, 114, 7652

Comment on “New Experimental Data and Mechanistic Studies on the Bromate-Dual Substrate-Dual Catalyst Batch Oscillator” Cristina M. P. Santos and Roberto B. Faria* Instituto de Quı´mica, UniVersidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, AV. Athos da SilVeira Ramos, 149, Centro de Tecnologia, Bloco A, 21941-909 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil ReceiVed: January 1, 2010; ReVised Manuscript ReceiVed: April 22, 2010 Experimental results obtained by Szalai et al.1 on the dual substrates dual catalyst bromate-hypophosphite-acetone-Mn(II)/Mn(III)[Ru(bpy)3]2+/[Ru(bpy)3]3+ batch oscillator and on some of its subsystems allow one to get a good insight on the complex chemistry of this system, especially on its inorganic part. However, the proposed model (see Tables 1 and 2 in ref 1) used to explain the nonlinear behavior of this system contains some cross effects between its species that prevent it from being considered as a realistic model. Initially, it is worthwhile to mention that we were able to reproduce Figures 7 and 9 of their article. To reproduce Figure 7, we used k11 ) 2 s-1 and [Mn(II)]0 ) 0.003 mol dm-3, and to reproduce Figure 9, we used [Ru(III)]0 ) 5 × 10-5 mol dm-3. All other initial concentrations were the same as indicated in the captions of Figures 7 and 9. All numerical integration has been done using a program written by Dr. Istva´n Lengyel in Turbo Pascal 6.0 and adapted to Free Pascal 2.0.4 to solve autonomous ordinary differential equation systems by a semi-implicit Runge-Kutta method.2 Initial concentrations formally considered as zero were indeed 1 × 10-10 mol dm-3 background concentrations.3 However, calculating Figure 9 for the bromate-acetone-Ru(II) subsystem, we have found that [Mn(III)] oscillates in a concentration range, approximately 100 times higher than [Ru(III)], even when [Mn(II)]0 is equal to zero, as can be seen in Figure 1. The reason for this is that (R3) is a kind of global reaction that produces Mn(III) even when no Mn(II) is present. As the rate law for this reaction does not contain [Mn(II)], the program code for numerical integration does not prevent the buildup of Mn(III) concentration, which is independent of [Mn(II)]0. The artificially formed Mn(III) reacts with Ru(II), producing Ru(III) by (R14).

BrO3- + HBrO2 + 3H+ + 2Mn(II) f 2HBrO2 + 2Mn(III) + H2O (R3) Mn(III) + Ru(II) f Mn(II) + Ru(III)

(R14)

When reproducing Figure 7 of ref 1, we found another problem. Because [Mn(II)]0 was not given in this figure caption, * Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected].

Figure 1. Simulation results for the bromate-acetone-Ru(II) subsystem showing the synchronized Ru(III) and Mn(III) unrealistic oscillations. [BrO3-]0 ) 0.02 mol dm-3, [Br-]0 ) 1 × 10-5 mol dm-3, [Ru(III)]0 ) 5 × 10-5 mol dm-3, [Ru(II)]0 ) [Mn(II)]0 ) [Mn(III)]0 ) [H3PO2]0 ) 0 mol dm-3, f ) 1, k10 ) 0.5 s-1, k11 ) 2 s-1. Compare with Figure 9 in ref 1.

we used several different values for [Mn(II)]0 and observed that the results did not change, all being equal to that shown in Figure 7. The explanation is the same as above: as [Mn(II)] does not appear in the (R3) rate law, it does not matter which initial concentration value is used; Mn(III) will be formed at a speed that depends only on bromate and HBrO2 concentrations. In conclusion, the simulated oscillations on the Ru(III) concentration shown in Figure 9 of ref 1, at zero initial Mn(II) concentration, are pumped by the oscillation on the Mn(III) concentration, which, obviously, should not happen in the absence of manganese ions. Therefore, a model for the bromatehypophosphite-acetone-Mn(II)-Ru(bpy)32+ batch oscillator is still in need of development. Acknowledgment. We thank Dr. Istva´n Lengyel for the use of his Turbo Pascal code and CNPq and FAPERJ for financial support. References and Notes (1) Szalai, I.; Kurin-Cso¨rgel, K.; Horva´th, V.; Orba´n, M. J. Phys. Chem. A 2006, 110, 6067. (2) Kaps, P.; Rentrop, P. Num. Math. 1979, 33, 55. (3) Pereira, J. A. M.; Faria, R. B. J. Phys. Chem. A 1997, 101, 5605.

JP100011B

10.1021/jp100011b  2010 American Chemical Society Published on Web 06/29/2010