Subscriber access provided by Columbia University Libraries
Article
Competitive Adsorption of CO2 over N2 in Asphaltene Slit Nanopores Studied by Molecular Simulation Haoyang Sun, Hui Zhao, Na Qi, Kai Zhang, Qiaozhi Wang, and Ying Li Energy Fuels, Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b02656 • Publication Date (Web): 31 Oct 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on November 1, 2017
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
Energy & Fuels is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 18
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Energy & Fuels
1
Competitive Adsorption of CO2 over N2 in Asphaltene Slit
2
Nanopores Studied by Molecular Simulation
3
Haoyang Sun, Hui Zhao, Na Qi, Kai Zhang, Qiaozhi Wang and Ying Li*
4
Key Laboratory of Colloid and Interface Chemistry of State Education
5
Ministry, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250100, P. R. China
6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Corresponding author:
15
Ying Li
16
Tel: (86) 0531-88362078
17
Email:
[email protected] 18
1
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Energy & Fuels
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
19
ABSTRACT
20
CO2 capture and sequestration (CCS) is recognized as one of the most promising
21
alternatives to weaken the greenhouse effect, and the nanoporous materials are
22
regarded as the promising candidates, therefore to develop new cost-effective sorbent
23
to achieve CCS is crucial. In this study, asphaltene-based slit-nanopores were used to
24
simulate capturing of CO2 from flue gas. The grand canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC)
25
and molecular dynamics (MD) simulation methods were employed to examine the
26
microscopic behaviors of CO2 and N2 in asphaltene slit-nanopores. The isosteric heat
27
of CO2 and N2 molecules adsorbed in asphaltene slit-nanopores, and the adsorption
28
energy of single molecule of CO2 and N2 adsorbed on the surface of asphaltene
29
fragments, and the self-diffusion of CO2 and N2 molecules adsorbed in asphaltene
30
slit-nanopores were examined. Strong competitive adsorption of CO2 over N2 is found
31
in a broad range of temperature and pressure, and it was found that the temperature
32
plays an important role on the competitive adsorption. This work demonstrates how
33
the competitive adsorption of CO2 over N2 happened in asphaltene slit-nanopores,
34
which not only enrich the theoretical knowledge about gases behaviors in asphaltene,
35
but also give out the feasibility that the asphaltenes or asphaltene-based materials
36
might be an interesting candidate for capturing CO2 from flue gas.
37
KEYWORDS: adsorption; flue gas; asphaltene; CO2 capture; simulation
38 39
2
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 2 of 18
Page 3 of 18
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Energy & Fuels
40
1. INTRODUCTION
41
Facing the serious global climate change that affected by the emission of carbon
42
dioxide (CO2) into atmosphere, the CO2 capture and sequestration (CCS) has got great
43
attentions.1-6 The rapidly increasing emission of CO2 is mainly generated from the
44
combustion of fossil fuels consumed in manufacturing industries and power
45
generation plants. Flue gas is one of the main exhaust gases that constituted by CO2
46
and N2 in a ratio of 15:85,7-8 hence capturing CO2 from flue gas is one of the key
47
processes in CCS.9
48
Recently, studies about the CO2 capture from flue gas by using various sorbents
49
have been extensively investigated both in experimental and computer simulations, of
50
which the theoretical and simulation studies could provide more detailed
51
micro-information about the mechanism of CO2 capture.10-12 The solid nanoporous
52
materials, such as zeolites, organic frameworks (MOFs), etc., were always regarded as
53
the preferable choice with the advantages of high efficiency and easy to get
54
reusability.9, 13 However, these solid sorbents with specific crystal structures are still
55
not easy to produce, and the cost is not low. Therefore, more and more common solid
56
nanoporous materials, including the nanoporous carbons (NPCs), inorganic minerals,
57
etc., were tried to achieve the CO2 capture recently, which with the obvious advantage
58
of cost-effective.8,
59
capture is still a meaningful topic with high potential.
14-16
Developing new cost-effective sorbent to achieve the CO2
60
Asphaltenes are the common byproduct of the petroleum and coal industries,
61
which can be defined as the fraction of a carbonaceous mixture with the ill-defined 3
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Energy & Fuels
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
62
polydisperse of structures and chemical composition.17-18 The “island” architecture
63
with single polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) was widely accepted by
64
researchers to date,19-20 and the molecular structures of some asphaltene samples with
65
the architecture of island had been clearly examined by using the scanning tunnelling
66
microscopy (STM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM).21-22 The asphaltenes can be
67
classified into various types as derived from different sources, including the
68
petroleum asphaltenes (PAs), coal-derived asphaltenes (CDAs) and immature source
69
rock asphaltenes (ISAs), which have different H:C ratio but similar solubility
70
characteristics.20 In addition to the extensive studies about the natural characteristics
71
of asphaltenes, such as the density, solubility, structure, composition and the
72
aggregate properties of asphaltenes,20,
73
applications of asphaltenes are relative rare.
23-28
investigation about the extended
74
In this study, the competitive adsorption of CO2 over N2 in mimic asphaltene
75
slit-nanopores were investigated. The adsorption density and self-diffusion properties
76
of CO2 and N2 molecules in asphaltene slit-nanopores are examined. And the isosteric
77
heats of gases in nanopores and adsorption energy of single gas molecule on
78
asphaltene fragments surface are also investigated. Strong competitive adsorption of
79
CO2 over N2 in asphaltene slit-nanopores is found, which hints the feasibility of being
80
used to capture CO2 from flue gas. This work provides some novel feasible way by
81
using nanoporous asphaltene-based materials to capture CO2 from flue gas.
82
2. MODELS AND METHODOLOGY
83
2.1 Atomistic Models 4
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 4 of 18
Page 5 of 18
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Energy & Fuels
84 85
Figure 1. (a) Model of the asphaltene slit-nanopore with two asphaltene matrices (the
86
surface landscape is in blue), (b) pore size distribution of the asphaltene matrix.
87
The model of asphaltene slit-nanopore with the pore width of ~25 Å was
88
constituted by two asphaltene matrices (Fig. 1a), and each asphaltene matrix was
89
constructed by various fragments of asphaltenes, including the petroleum asphaltenes
90
(PAs) fragments, the coal-derived asphaltenes (CDAs) fragments and the immature
91
source rock asphaltenes (ISAs) fragments as described in the study of Wang et al..20
92
The asphaltene matrix was constructed by using the Amorphous Cell program
93
package of Materials Studio (MS),29 with the density of 1.20 g/cm3 and H/C ratio of
94
1.28. And the matrix was minimized by the process of annealing dynamics from 300
95
to 1000 K with the temperature cycle.30 The optimal configuration of asphaltene
96
matrix is shown in Fig. 1b with the dimension of 35 × 35 × 26 Å3, and the matrix
97
was amorphous with the pore size distribution mainly around ~2.3 Å due to the
98
irregular combination of the asphaltene fragments. And according to the kinetic
99
diameters of CO2 (3.3 Å) and N2 (3.64 Å),31 few CO2 and N2 molecules can be 5
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Energy & Fuels
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 6 of 18
100
adsorbed inside the intrinsic pores of the matrix. The whole sorbent was described by
101
the COMPASS32 force field and which was regard as rigid during the simulations. For
102
gases, a three-site model was used to describe the CO233 molecule and a two-site
103
model was used to describe the N234 molecule, the atomic charges and bond lengths
104
were list in table 1. Table 1. Atomic charges and bond lengths of CO2 and N2.
105
Molecule
Atom
Charge (e)
C
0.576
O
-0.288
N
0
CO2
N2 106
Bond length (Å)
1.180
1.102
2.2 Simulation Details
107
The COMPASS32 force field was used to describe the entire simulation, and the
108
non-bond interactions were constituted by the van der Waals (vdW) and electrostatic
109
potentials. As described in our previous work,35 the GCMC method was employed to
110
investigate the adsorption properties of CO2 and N2 in asphaltene slit-nanopores by
111
using the Sorption program package of MS. The acceptance or rejection of a trial
112
move was described by the Metropolis algorithm.36 The vdW interaction was
113
described by the Lennard-Jones 9-6 potential, and the electrostatic interaction was
114
examined by the Coulombic term. And each equilibration and calculation process has
115
5 × 106 steps. Meantime, the self-diffusion properties of CO2 and N2 in asphaltene
116
slit-nanopores were examined by the MD method by using the Forcite program
117
package of MS. The NVT ensemble with the temperature thermostat of Nosé-Hoover
6
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 7 of 18
118
was employed to examine the MD process. And each MD simulation process had a
119
total run time of 5.0 ns with a time step of 1 fs, and the last 1.0 ns was used for
120
analysis. For the single molecule of CO2 and N2 adsorbed on the surface of asphaltene
121
fragments, the Dmol3 program package was used to calculate the minimum energy
122
configuration.37
123
Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (PBE) were employed to describe the exchange-correlation
124
interaction,38 and the density functional semicore pseudopotential (DSPP)39 method
125
with the localized double-numerical basis with a polarization (DNP) functional was
126
employed, according to our previous work about the micro-behaviors of CO2 and CH4
127
molecules in kerogen slit-nanopores.35
128
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
129
3.1 Competitive Adsorption of CO2 over N2 in Asphaltene Slit Nanopores
The
generalized
1.5
1.2 1.1 1.0 0.9
(GGA)
0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1
0.24 0.21 0.18
and
(b)
273 K 298 K 323 K 348 K 373 K
0.27
0.0
0.15 0.12 0.09 0.06 0.03 0.00
0
130
approximation
0.30
Adsorption Loading (mmol/g)
1.3
gradient
(a)
273 K 298 K 323 K 348 K 373 K
1.4
Adsorption Loading (mmol/g)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Energy & Fuels
200
400
600
800
1000
0
200
fugacity (kPa)
400
600
800
1000
fugacity (kPa)
131
Figure 2. Adsorption isotherms of CO2 (a) and N2 (b) as binary mixtures in asphaltene
132
slit-nanopores at various temperatures.
133
The absolute adsorption isotherms of CO2 and N2 as binary mixtures in
134
asphaltene slit-nanopores got by the mixture GCMC method were shown in Fig. 2. It
135
is found that the adsorption amount of CO2 and N2 increases gradually with the 7
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Energy & Fuels
136
increasing pressure, and the temperature has negative influences on the adsorption
137
capacity of gases in asphaltene slit-nanopores. While the capacity of CO2 uptake itself
138
in asphaltene slit-nanopores is weaker comparing with that in nanoporous carbons,
139
which is mainly attributed to the effects of the functionalization of the carbon
140
fragments that enhancing the adsorption amount of CO2.8 And as it was shown in Fig.
141
2, the CO2 has stronger adsorption capacity with the adsorption amount about 10
142
times larger than N2 in asphaltene slit-nanopores at the pressure of one atmosphere,
143
which indicates that the CO2 molecules have stronger adsorption interactions with the
144
asphaltenes comparing with N2. 35
30
Selectivity (CO2/N2)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 8 of 18
273 298 323 348 373
25
20
K K K K K
15
10
5
0 0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000 1100
fugacity (kPa)
145 146
Figure 3. Selectivity of CO2 over N2 in asphaltene slit-nanopores at various
147
temperatures; y-CO2 (bulk phase) = 0.5.
148
According to the different adsorption intensity between the CO2 and N2
149
molecules in asphaltene slit-nanopores that mentioned above, the selectivity
150
parameter (S) was employed to describe the competitive adsorption of CO2 over N2 as
151
binary mixture in asphaltene slit-nanopores, with the following equation,34
152
S=
x CO 2 / x N 2 y CO 2 / y N 2
(1)
8
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 9 of 18
153
in which x is the fraction of gas component in the adsorbed phase, y is the fraction of
154
gas component in the bulk phase. As shown in Fig. 3, it can be found that the
155
competitive adsorption of CO2 over N2 in asphaltene slit-nanopores is broadly
156
occurred. And the capacities of the competitive adsorption of CO2/N2 are large at the
157
initial low pressures and decrease with the increasing pressure, it is because more
158
active sites are exist at the low pressure condition (equal to low adsorption loading)
159
and which decreases with the increasing loading, therefore further adsorbed gases
160
molecules have to adsorb and locate at the less favored sites, leading to the decrease
161
of SCO2/N2 with the enlarged pressures.34 From Fig. 3, it also can be found that the
162
temperature has obvious influences on the competitive adsorption of CO2 over N2, and
163
the SCO2/N2 decreases with the increasing temperatures.
0.010 0.009
CO2
0.008 3
Density (molecule/Å )
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Energy & Fuels
0.007
0.1 MPa 0.5 MPa 1 MPa
(a)
N2 0.1 MPa 0.5 MPa 1 MPa
0.006 0.005 0.004 0.003 0.002 0.001 0.000 -40 -35 -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Z (Å)
164 165
Figure 4. (a) Adsorption density profiles of CO2 and N2 as binary mixtures in
166
asphaltene slit-nanopores at various pressures and T = 323 K, (b) the corresponding
167
snapshot at 0.5 MPa and 323 K; Z = 0 refers to the center of the pore and y-CO2 (bulk
168
phase) = 0.5.
169
The distribution of adsorption density of the binary mixed CO2 and N2 in 9
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Energy & Fuels
170
asphaltene slit-nanopores at different pressures and 323 K is shown in Fig. 4, it can be
171
found that the CO2 molecules prefer to adsorb close onto the pore surface, while the
172
N2 molecules mainly adsorb at the central part of the pore, and the density of both
173
increases with the enlarged pressures. From Fig. 4b which can be seen that clearly, the
174
surface sites of asphaltene slit-nanopore are almost occupied by the CO2 molecules,
175
the N2 molecules mainly located at the central part of the pore and adsorption amount
176
of N2 is low at the condition of 0.5 MPa and 323 K. It further demonstrates that the
177
CO2 molecules have stronger adsorption interactions with the asphaltene
178
slit-nanopores comparing with N2.
179
3.2 Isosteric Heats of CO2 and N2 in Asphaltene Slit Nanopores 10
isosteric heat (kcal / mol)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 10 of 18
9
CO2 adsorbed in asphaltene slit-nanopores
8
N2 adsorbed in asphaltene slit-nanopores
7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 0
200
400
600
800
1000
fugacity (kPa)
180 181
Figure 5. Isosteric heats of CO2 (black line) and N2 (red line) in asphaltene
182
slit-nanopores as the variation of adsorption pressure at T = 323 K.
183
To further investigate the different adsorption intensity between CO2 and N2
184
molecules in slit-nanopores of asphaltene, the isosteric heat (Qst) was employed to
185
perform the adsorption capacity of gases in nanopores, which expressed as,29
186 187
= −
〈 〉〈 〉〈 〉 〉〈 〉 〈
(2)
where is the gas constant, T is the temperature, is the adsorption energy and 10
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 11 of 18
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Energy & Fuels
188
is the number of adsorbate. The Qst of CO2 and N2 in asphaltene slit-nanopores at
189
323 K are shown in Fig. 5, it is found that the Qst value of CO2 is much larger than N2
190
in asphaltene slit-nanopores, which indicates that the CO2 molecules have stronger
191
adsorption interactions with the asphaltene slit-nanopore than N2 molecules. Both the
192
Qst of CO2 and N2 decrease with the enlarged pressure, it is because the favorable
193
adsorption sites decrease with the increasing adsorption loading.29
194
3.3 Adsorption Energy of Single Molecule of CO2 and N2 on Asphaltene
195
Fragments
196
197 198
Figure 6. Stable adsorption configurations (side view (up) and top view (down)) of
199
CO2 (a−d) and N2 (e−h) molecule adsorbed on the surface of asphaltene fragments.
200
The detailed adsorption properties of single CO2 and N2 molecule adsorbed onto
201
the basic unit of asphaltene molecule were examined by the adsorption energy (Eads) 11
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Energy & Fuels
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
202
Page 12 of 18
with the follow equation,40
Eads = Ea+s – Es – Ea
203
(3)
204
in which Ea is the energy of the gas species, Es is the energy of the asphaltene
205
fragment, and Ea+s is the total energy of the gas molecule adsorbed on the surface of
206
asphaltene fragment. As shown in Fig. 6, four types of the asphaltene fragments were
207
chosen to investigate the Eads between the CO2 and N2 molecule adsorbed on the
208
surface of asphaltene fragments. It is found that the Eads of CO2 is weaker than N2 on
209
each asphaltene fragment, which further demonstrate that the CO2 molecule has
210
stronger adsorption interaction with the asphaltene fragments than N2. And according
211
to the adsorption sites of CO2 and N2 molecule on the surface of asphaltene fragments,
212
it can be found that the CO2 molecules almost parallel to the surface of asphaltene
213
fragments and choose the bridge site of the C-C bond as the favorable adsorption site,
214
which is consistent with our previous work about the CO2 molecule adsorbed on the
215
surface of kerogen fragments.35 The N2 molecules also prefer to parallel to the surface
216
of asphaltene fragment with no obvious favorable adsorption sites, which mainly
217
attributed to the weak interactions between the N2 molecules and the asphaltene
218
fragments.
219
3.4 Self-diffusion of CO2 and N2 in Asphaltene Slit Nanopores
12
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 13 of 18
8
CO2 adsorbed onto the asphaltene pore surface
7
N2 adsorbed onto the asphaltene pore surface
6 5
2
Ds (10 cm /s)
4
-4
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Energy & Fuels
3 2 1 0
273
298
323
348
373
T (K)
220 221
Figure 7. Diffusion coefficients of CO2 (black symbol) and N2 (red symbol) in
222
asphaltene slit-nanopores as a function of temperature (T) at P = 0.1 MPa.
223
The microscopic diffusion properties of CO2 and N2 molecules adsorbed inside
224
the asphaltene slit-nanopores were performed by the self-diffusion coefficients (Ds) of
225
gases that expressed as,41
226
Ds =
1 d n 2 〈 ri (t ) −ri (0) 〉 ∑ lim 6 t →∞ dt i
(4)
227
where ri(t) is the position of the center of molecule i at time t, and ri(0) is the initial
228
position. Gas molecules adsorbed close onto the pore surface were marked to
229
calculate the Ds, as shown in Fig. 7. It can be found that the Ds of CO2 is much
230
weaker than N2 in asphaltene slit-nanopores due to the stronger adsorption
231
interactions between the CO2 molecules with the asphaltene nanopore. And from Fig.
232
7, it also can be found that the temperature has obvious influences on the
233
self-diffusion of CO2 and N2 molecules, the Ds increases with the temperature
234
increasing. The differences of Ds between CO2 and N2 molecules in asphaltene
235
slit-nanopores demonstrate that the CO2 molecules adsorb more strongly inside the 13
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Energy & Fuels
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 14 of 18
236
asphaltene slit-nanopores, which further verify that the CO2 molecules have stronger
237
adsorption interactions in asphaltene slit-nanopores comparing with N2 moleucles,
238
and ensures the occurrence of the competitive adsorption of CO2 over N2 in
239
asphaltene slit-nanopores.
240
4. CONCLUSION
241
This study demonstrates the competitive adsorption of CO2 over N2 in asphaltene
242
slit-nanopores by
molecular simulations.
The
microscopic adsorption
243
self-diffusion properties of CO2 and N2 as binary mixtures in asphaltene
244
slit-nanopores are revealed. The isosteric heat and adsorption energy of CO2 and N2 in
245
asphaltene slit-nanopores and on asphaltene fragments are also examined, respectively,
246
to verify the competitive adsorption of CO2 over N2. This work is an exploration
247
about using asphaltene as a candidate capturing CO2 from flue gas, which provides a
248
promising way to achieve CCS by using the asphaltene-based nanoporous materials.
249
AUTHOR INFORMATION
250
Corresponding Author:
251
*Email:
[email protected] 252
Tel: (86) 0531-88362078
253
Notes
254
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
255
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
256
The funding of National Science Fund of China (No. 21473103 and 61575109) are
257
gratefully acknowledged. 14
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
and
Page 15 of 18
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Energy & Fuels
258
REFERENCES
259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300
(1) Barthel, A.; Saih, Y.; Gimenez, M.; Pelletier, J. D. A.; Kühn, F. E.; D'Elia, V.; Basset, J.-M., Highly Integrated Co2capture and Conversion: Direct Synthesis of Cyclic Carbonates from Industrial Flue Gas. Green Chem. 2016, 18, 3116-3123. (2) Rahman, F. A.; Aziz, M. M. A.; Saidur, R.; Bakar, W. A. W. A.; Hainin, M. R.; Putrajaya, R.; Hassan, N. A., Pollution to Solution: Capture and Sequestration of Carbon Dioxide (Co2) and Its Utilization as a Renewable Energy Source for a Sustainable Future. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2017, 71, 112-126. (3) Gibbins, J.; Chalmers, H., Carbon Capture and Storage. Energy Policy 2008, 36, 4317-4322. (4) Craig, M. T.; Jaramillo, P.; Zhai, H.; Klima, K., The Economic Merits of Flexible Carbon Capture and Sequestration as a Compliance Strategy with the Clean Power Plan. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 1102-1109. (5) Meylan, F. D.; Moreau, V.; Erkman, S., Co2 Utilization in the Perspective of Industrial Ecology, an Overview. J. CO2. Util. 2015, 12, 101-108. (6) Bourg, I. C.; Beckingham, L. E.; DePaolo, D. J., The Nanoscale Basis of Co2 Trapping for Geologic Storage. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 10265-10284. (7) Mirzaei, S.; Shamiri, A.; Aroua, M. K., Simulation of Aqueous Blend of Monoethanolamine and Glycerol for Carbon Dioxide Capture from Flue Gas. Energy & Fuels 2016, 30, 9540-9553. (8) Zhou, S.; Guo, C.; Wu, Z.; Wang, M.; Wang, Z.; Wei, S.; Li, S.; Lu, X., Edge-Functionalized Nanoporous Carbons for High Adsorption Capacity and Selectivity of Co 2 over N 2. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 410, 259-266. (9) Chen, Y.; Jiang, J., A Bio-Metal-Organic Framework for Highly Selective Co(2) Capture: A Molecular Simulation Study. ChemSusChem 2010, 3, 982-988. (10) Jiang, J.; Babarao, R.; Hu, Z., Molecular Simulations for Energy, Environmental and Pharmaceutical Applications of Nanoporous Materials: From Zeolites, Metal-Organic Frameworks to Protein Crystals. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 3599-3612. (11) D'Alessandro, D. M.; Smit, B.; Long, J. R., Carbon Dioxide Capture: Prospects for New Materials. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2010, 49, 6058-6082. (12) Bae, Y. S.; Snurr, R. Q., Development and Evaluation of Porous Materials for Carbon Dioxide Separation and Capture. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2011, 50, 11586-11596. (13) Choi, S.; Drese, J. H.; Jones, C. W., Adsorbent Materials for Carbon Dioxide Capture from Large Anthropogenic Point Sources. ChemSusChem 2009, 2, 796-854. (14) Srinivas, G.; Krungleviciute, V.; Guo, Z.-X.; Yildirim, T., Exceptional Co2capture in a Hierarchically Porous Carbon with Simultaneous High Surface Area and Pore Volume. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 335-342. (15) Builes, S.; López-Aranguren, P.; Fraile, J.; Vega, L. F.; Domingo, C., Analysis of Co2adsorption in Amine-Functionalized Porous Silicas by Molecular Simulations. Energy & Fuels 2015, 29, 3855-3862. (16) Cygan, R. T.; Romanov, V. N.; Myshakin, E. M., Molecular Simulation of Carbon Dioxide Capture by Montmorillonite Using an Accurate and Flexible Force Field. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 13079-13091. (17) Barrera, D. M.; Ortiz, D. P.; Yarranton, H. W., Molecular Weight and Density Distributions of Asphaltenes from Crude Oils. Energy & Fuels 2013, 27, 2474-2487. (18) Powers, D. P.; Sadeghi, H.; Yarranton, H. W.; van den Berg, F. G. A., Regular Solution Based Approach to Modeling Asphaltene Precipitation from Native and Reacted Oils: Part 1, Molecular Weight, Density, and Solubility Parameter Distributions of Asphaltenes. Fuel 2016, 178, 218-233. 15
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Energy & Fuels
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344
(19) Schuler, B., et al., Characterizing Aliphatic Moieties in Hydrocarbons with Atomic Force Microscopy. Chemical science 2017, 8, 2315-2320. (20) Wang, W., et al., Nanoaggregates of Diverse Asphaltenes by Mass Spectrometry and Molecular Dynamics. Energy & Fuels 2017. (21) Schuler, B.; Meyer, G.; Pena, D.; Mullins, O. C.; Gross, L., Unraveling the Molecular Structures of Asphaltenes by Atomic Force Microscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 9870-9876. (22) Schuler, B., et al., Heavy Oil Based Mixtures of Different Origins and Treatments Studied by Atomic Force Microscopy. Energy & Fuels 2017, 31, 6856-6861. (23) Mullins, O. C., The Modified Yen Model†. Energy & Fuels 2010, 24, 2179-2207. (24) Mullins, O. C., et al., Advances in Asphaltene Science and the Yen–Mullins Model. Energy & Fuels 2012, 26, 3986-4003. (25) Wang, H.; Xu, H.; Jia, W.; Liu, J.; Ren, S., Revealing the Intermolecular Interactions of Asphaltene Dimers by Quantum Chemical Calculations. Energy & Fuels 2017, 31, 2488-2495. (26) Snowdon, L. R.; Volkman, J. K.; Zhang, Z.; Tao, G.; Liu, P., The Organic Geochemistry of Asphaltenes and Occluded Biomarkers. Org. Geochem. 2016, 91, 3-15. (27) Rogel, E.; Ovalles, C.; Bake, K. D.; Zuo, J. Y.; Dumont, H.; Pomerantz, A. E.; Mullins, O. C., Asphaltene Densities and Solubility Parameter Distributions: Impact on Asphaltene Gradients. Energy & Fuels 2016, 30, 9132-9140. (28) Pan, Y.; Liao, Y.; Zheng, Y., Effect of Biodegradation on the Molecular Composition and Structure of Asphaltenes: Clues from Quantitative Py–Gc and Thm–Gc. Org. Geochem. 2015, 86, 32-44. (29) Zhou, J.; Zhu, X.; Hu, J.; Liu, H.; Hu, Y.; Jiang, J., Mechanistic Insight into Highly Efficient Gas Permeation and Separation in a Shape-Persistent Ladder Polymer Membrane. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014, 16, 6075-6083. (30) Zhao, Y.; Feng, Y.; Zhang, X., Selective Adsorption and Selective Transport Diffusion of Co2-Ch4 Binary Mixture in Coal Ultramicropores. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 50, 9380-9389. (31) Amani, M.; Amjad-Iranagh, S.; Golzar, K.; Sadeghi, G. M. M.; Modarress, H., Study of Nanostructure Characterizations and Gas Separation Properties of Poly(Urethane–Urea)S Membranes by Molecular Dynamics Simulation. J. Membrane Sci 2014, 462, 28-41. (32) Sun, H., Compass: An Ab Initio Force-Field Optimized for Condensed-Phase Applications Overview with Details on Alkane and Benzene Compounds. J. Phys. Chem. B 1998, 102, 7338-7364. (33) Zhang, L.; Hu, Z.; Jiang, J., Metal–Organic Framework/Polymer Mixed-Matrix Membranes for H2/Co2 Separation: A Fully Atomistic Simulation Study. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 19268-19277. (34) Zhuo, S.; Huang, Y.; Hu, J.; Liu, H.; Hu, Y.; Jiang, J., Computer Simulation for Adsorption of Co 2, N 2 and Flue Gas in a Mimetic Mcm-41. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 11295-11300. (35) Sun, H.; Zhao, H.; Qi, N.; Li, Y., Molecular Insights into the Enhanced Shale Gas Recovery by Carbon Dioxide in Kerogen Slit Nanopores. J. Phys. Chem. C 2017, 121, 10233-10241. (36) Frenkel, D.; Smit, B., Understanding Molecular Simulation: From Algorithms to Applications; Academic press, 2001; Vol. 1. (37) Delley, B., From Molecules to Solids with the Dmol 3 Approach. J.Chem. Phys. 2000, 113, 7756-7764. (38) Perdew, J. P.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M., Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 3865. (39) Delley, B., Hardness Conserving Semilocal Pseudopotentials. Phys Rev B 2002, 66, 155125. (40) Yuan, Q.; Zhu, X.; Lin, K.; Zhao, Y. P., Molecular Dynamics Simulations of the Enhanced Recovery 16
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 16 of 18
Page 17 of 18
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Energy & Fuels
345 346 347
of Confined Methane with Carbon Dioxide. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 31887-31893. (41) Zhai, Z.; Wang, X.; Jin, X.; Sun, L.; Li, J.; Cao, D., Adsorption and Diffusion of Shale Gas Reservoirs in Modeled Clay Minerals at Different Geological Depths. Energy & Fuels 2014, 28, 7467-7473.
348 349
17
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Energy & Fuels
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
350
Table of Content (TOC)
351
18
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 18 of 18