Subscriber access provided by University of Newcastle, Australia
Article
Complete Nitrogen Removal from Synthetic Anaerobic Sludge Digestion Liquor through Integrating Anammox and Denitrifying Anaerobic Methane Oxidation in a Membrane Biofilm Reactor Guo-Jun Xie, Chen Cai, Shihu Hu, and Zhiguo Yuan Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b04500 • Publication Date (Web): 16 Dec 2016 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on December 20, 2016
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
Environmental Science & Technology is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 30
Environmental Science & Technology
1
Complete Nitrogen Removal from Synthetic Anaerobic Sludge Digestion Liquor
2
through Integrating Anammox and Denitrifying Anaerobic Methane Oxidation in a
3
Membrane Biofilm Reactor
4 5
Guo-Jun Xie†, Chen Cai†, Shihu Hu† and Zhiguo Yuan*,†
6 7
†
8
QLD 4072, Australia
Advanced Water Management Centre, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane,
9 10 11
*Corresponding author.
12
E-mail:
[email protected];
13
Tel: +61 (0) 7 336 54374;
14
Fax: +61 (0) 7 336 54726.
1
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
15
Abstract
16
Partial nitritation and Anammox processes are increasingly used for nitrogen
17
removal from anaerobic sludge digestion liquor. However, their nitrogen removal
18
efficiency is often limited due to the production of nitrate by the Anammox reaction
19
and the sensitivity to the nitrite to ammonium ratio. This work develops and
20
demonstrates an innovative process that achieves complete nitrogen removal from
21
partially nitrified anaerobic sludge digestion liquor through the use of a membrane
22
biofilm reactor (MBfR), with methane supplied through hollow fibre membranes.
23
When steady state with a hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 1 day was reached, the
24
process achieved complete nitrite and ammonium removal at rates of 560 mg N/L/d
25
and 470 mg N/L/d, respectively, without any nitrate accumulation. The process is
26
relatively insensitive to the nitrite to ammonium ratio, achieving complete nitrogen
27
removal when their ratio in influent varied in the range of 1.125–1.32. Pyrosequencing
28
and fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis revealed that denitrifying anaerobic
29
methane oxidation (DAMO) archaea, Anammox bacteria and DAMO bacteria jointly
30
dominated the microbial community. Mass balance analysis showed that nitrate
31
produced by Anammox (122.2 mg N/L/d) was entirely converted to nitrite by DAMO
32
archaea, while nitrite in the feed and produced by DAMO archaea was jointly removed
33
by Anammox (90%) and DAMO bacteria (10%). The nitrogen removal rate of over 1
34
kg N/m3/d is comparable to the practical rates reported for side-stream nitrogen
35
removal processes.
36
Keywords: Nitrogen removal; Denitrifying anaerobic methane oxidation; Membrane Biofilm
37
Reactor; Anammox
38 39 2
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 2 of 30
Page 3 of 30
40
Environmental Science & Technology
TOC Art
41 42
3
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
43
1. Introduction
44
Human activities have resulted in ever increasing discharge of municipal and
45
industrial wastewater containing reactive nitrogen to the natural water bodies, which
46
has contributed to a host of environmental problems, including eutrophication1,
47
biodiversity loss2 and dysfunction of aquatic ecosystems3. Biological nitrogen removal
48
is a critical process returning reactive nitrogen to the atmosphere as dinitrogen gas and
49
maintaining the balance of the global nitrogen budget. However, conventional
50
biological nitrogen removal processes require considerably energy to provide oxygen
51
for aerobic conversion of ammonium to nitrate/nitrite by nitrification and then
52
consumes large amounts of carbon sources for anaerobic conversion of nitrate/nitrite
53
to nitrogen gas by heterotrophic denitrification4. As a result, traditional nitrification-
54
denitrification process incurs significant operation costs. Achieving complete nitrogen
55
removal from wastewater while minimizing energy and organic carbon consumption is
56
a crucial challenge for the water industry.
57
Anaerobic ammonium oxidation (Anammox) has the unique metabolic ability to
58
combine ammonium and nitrite to form nitrogen gas5. Autotrophic nitrogen removal
59
over nitrite can be achieved through combination of partial nitritation and Anammox,
60
which entails significant advantages over classical nitrification/denitrification.
61
Through partial nitritation, ammonium oxidizing bacteria (AOB) consumes a limited
62
amount of oxygen to partially oxidize ammonium to nitrite6, while Anammox converts
63
residual ammonia and nitrite into nitrogen gas under anoxic conditions. The
64
combination of AOB and Anammox could save 60% of aeration and 100% of organic
65
carbon, and reduce sludge production by 90%4. However, Anammox process faces the
66
challenges that a strict nitrite to ammonium ratio of 1.32 is required7, and that
67
Anammox converts 20% of the nitrite to nitrate (Reaction 1). This process (partial 4
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 4 of 30
Page 5 of 30
Environmental Science & Technology
68
nitritation/Anammox) does not remove nitrate present in the wastewater, and hence its
69
theoretical maximum nitrogen removal efficiency is 89%. In actual operation, the ratio
70
of nitrite to ammonium may deviate significantly from the desired ratio, which often
71
results in nitrogen removal efficiency about 70%8-10.
72
NH 4+ + 1.32 NO2− → 1.02 N 2 + 0.26 NO3− + 2.03H 2O
73
The discovery of denitrifying anaerobic methane oxidation (DAMO) process, in
74
which methane is oxidized anaerobically to provide electrons for denitrification, not
75
only forms an important link between global carbon and nitrogen cycles11-13, but also
76
provides an opportunity for enhancing the nitrogen removal performance of the
77
Anammox process using biogas methane as a cheap, supplementary electron donor14.
78
A microbial consortium enriched from freshwater sediments was demonstrated to
79
oxidize methane to carbon dioxide coupled to denitrification under strictly anaerobic
80
conditions15. This consortium consisted of two distinct microorganisms, DAMO
81
bacteria and DAMO archaea. DAMO bacteria convert nitrite to nitric oxide and then
82
oxidize methane using intracellular oxygen produced from the dismutation of nitric
83
oxide (Reaction 2)16, while DAMO archaea reduce nitrate to nitrite using electrons
84
derived from methane oxidation through reverse methanogenesis (Reaction 3)17.
(1)
85
3CH 4 + 8 NO2− + 8 H + → 3CO2 + 4 N 2 + 10 H 2O
(2)
86
CH 4 + 4 NO3− → CO2 + 4 NO2− + 2 H 2O
(3)
87
Nitrate reduction by DAMO archaea provides a novel possibility of achieving complete
88
nitrogen removal through cooperation of Anammox and DAMO archaea. In such a process,
89
nitrite and ammonium are converted into dinitrogen by Anammox with nitrate as a by-
90
product (Reaction 1); methane is used by DAMO archaea to denitrify nitrate into nitrite
91
(Reaction 3), which is subsequently removed by Anammox. The net reaction becomes
5
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 6 of 30
92
Reaction 4, with a theoretical nitrite to ammonium ratio of 1.06 (from the Anammox reaction
93
ratio of 1.32).
94
NH 4+ + 1.06 NO2− + 0.065CH 4 → 1.02 N 2 + 2.16 H 2O + 0.065CO2
95
In addition, the co-occurrence of nitrite and methane in this process could enable the
96
growth of DAMO bacteria (Reaction 2), which is also responsible for nitrogen removal
97
through direct conversion of nitrite to nitrogen gas. This reaction, if occurs, provides an
98
additional degree of freedom making the process more flexible in terms of the nitrite to
99
ammonium ratio required. As a result, complete nitrogen removal could be achieved by
100 101
(4)
Anammox/DAMO without the requirement of the fixed ratio between nitrite and ammonium. The recent studies not only detected the co-occurrence of Anammox and DAMO
102
organisms in natural environments, such as wetland18 and paddy soil19, 20, but also enriched in
103
laboratory reactors fed with methane, ammonium and nitrate/nitrite17, 21, 22. However, the
104
current nitrate/nitrite removal rates of suspended DAMO microorganisms were only 13-40.32
105
mg N/L/d14, 21-24, which are too low for practical applications. In order to achieve a higher
106
nitrogen removal rate, a membrane biofilm reactor (MBfR) was developed to deliver methane
107
to the DAMO microorganisms in biofilm that grew on the outer surface of hollow fibre
108
membrane25. To stimulate the growth of DAMO archaea and Anammox bacteria, nitrate and
109
ammonium were provided in the feed. The nitrate removal rate by DAMO archaea was
110
achieved at 190 mg N/L/d25 in sequencing batch operation, which was further enhanced to
111
684 mg N/L/d through continuous operation26. However, the reactor was fed with nitrate
112
(600–1500 mg N/L) and ammonium (300–600 mg N/L), which does not represent effluent
113
from a partial nitritation reactor. Also, the reactor displayed poor and unstable nitrogen
114
removal performance with the effluent nitrate and ammonium concentrations up to 300 mg
115
N/L and 400 mg N/L, respectively.
6
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 7 of 30
116
Environmental Science & Technology
Therefore, the key objectives of this work are: (1) to develop the above-mentioned MBfR
117
concept into a technology that removes nitrogen from partial nitritation effluent of anaerobic
118
sludge digestion liquor; (2) to determine the effluent quality and nitrogen removal rate that
119
are achievable with the MBfR technology; (3) to investigate the nitrogen removal by MBfR
120
system when the nitrite to ammonium ratio varies. To achieve the above research objectives,
121
a laboratory reactor was equipped with polypropylene hollow-fibres. The MBfR was fed with
122
synthetic wastewater containing nitrite and ammonium mimicking the effluent from partial
123
nitritation of anaerobic digestion liquor, with the nitrite to ammonium ratio initially fixed at
124
its theoretical value of 1.06, and then varied in the range of 1.0-1.375. The performance of
125
the MBfR was closely monitored through chemical analysis, and the microbial community
126
investigated using Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and 16S rRNA gene amplicon
127
sequencing. The interactions among key organisms, Anammox bacteria, DAMO bacteria and
128
DAMO archaea were analysed through mass balance analysis.
129
2. Materials and methods
130
2.1 MBfR setup
131
The MBfR was equipped with 12 bundles of hollow-fibre membrane and was fed
132
methane in lumen of membrane through a gas cylinder (Figure 1). Each bundle consisted of
133
500 hollow-fibres (non-porous polypropylene hollow-fibre, Teijin Fibres, Ltd, Japan) with a
134
length of 30 cm and an inner/outer fibre diameter of 90/200 µm. The total surface area of
135
membrane was 1.13 m2. Both ends of the hollow fibres were connected to a feeding gas
136
cylinder (95% CH4 and 5% CO2). The gas pressure of interior hollow fibres was manually
137
adjusted at 250 kPa by the regulator connected to the gas cylinder and monitored by a gas-
138
pressure gauge (Ross Brown, Australia). The feeding gas was forced to penetrate through the
139
wall of the hollow fibres, while the non-porous layer allows the creation of a high driving
140
force for gas permeation without bubble formation27. 7
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
141 142
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the membrane biofilm reactor (MBfR)
143
The total volume of the reactor is 2356 mL with a volume of 11 mL inside the hollow
144
fibres for gas delivery and a volume of 45 mL for fibres material. As a result, the working
145
volume of the MBfR was 2300 mL for liquid flow and biofilm growth. Thus, the specific
146
surface area of biofilm is 491 m2/m3. A 20 L feeding tank was used to store synthetic
147
wastewater containing nitrite and ammonium. To ensure anaerobic operation of the MBfR, a
148
20 L gas bag containing nitrogen gas was connected to the feeding tank. The synthetic
149
wastewater was fed to the reactors with a peristaltic pump (BT300-2J, Longerpump, China).
150
Complete mixing of the reactor was ensured through liquid recirculation (600 mL/min) using
151
a peristaltic pump (Masterflex L/S, USA). A 330 mL overflow bottle was set up to release the
152
gas produced in the MBfR and monitor the system pH by a pH meter (Oakton, Australia).
153
The system pH was maintained at 7.0-8.0 by manually injecting 1 M HCl or 1 M NaOH
154
solutions every day.
155
2.2 Operation of MBfR
156 157
The reactor was operated continuously for 627 days, with two phases namely a start-up phase and a continuous phase. During the start-up phase, the MBfR was inoculated with 8
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 8 of 30
Page 9 of 30
Environmental Science & Technology
158
sludge (400 mL) taken from a parent bioreactor fed with methane, ammonium and nitrate,
159
where both Anammox and DAMO microorganisms were enriched in the suspended phase17.
160
At the time of inoculation, the volatile suspended solid (VSS) of the parent reactor was
161
approximately 3 g/L. Following inoculation, mixed gas (95% CH4 and 5% CO2) was supplied
162
to the lumen of the fibres, and the reactor was operated in recirculation mode to establish
163
biofilm colonization. To prevent biomass washout through effluent discharge during this
164
stage, concentrated nitrite (46 g N/L) and ammonium (46 g N/L) solutions were fed manually
165
to maintain the bulk ammonium and nitrite concentrations in the ranges of 0-200 mg N/L and
166
0-25 mg N/L.
167
From Day 223, the MBfR was turned into continuous operation. The influent
168
contained 500 mg NH4+-N/L and 530 mg NO2−-N/L with a ratio of 1:1.06 (Reaction 4).
169
The total nitrogen was 1030 mg N/L to mimic effluent from partial nitritation of
170
anaerobic digestion liquor. The initial HRT was set at 8 days with a nitrogen loading
171
rate at 128.8 mg N/L/d, based on the measured nitrogen removal rate of 120 mg N/L/d
172
on Day 223. During the continuous operation, the HRT was stepwise decreased from 8
173
days to 1 day when the nitrate was almost completely removed at each condition.
174
From Day 588, the ratio of nitrite to ammonium was changed to 1.19 with 470 mg
175
NH4+-N and 560 mg NO2--N/L in the influent, with the aim to achieve complete
176
nitrogen removal.
177
After the reactor reached steady-state, the MBfR nitrogen removal performance at
178
different influent nitrite to ammonium ratios (1.0, 1.125, 1.19, 1.25, 1.32 and 1.375)
179
was investigated in 6 runs. In all tests, total nitrogen in influent was kept constantly at
180
1030 mg N/L. The MBfR was operated continuously, with each test lasting for 4 days.
181
During all tests, liquid samples were taken every 12 h from the overflow bottle to determine
182
the concentrations of NH4+-N, NO2−-N and NO3−-N. 9
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
183 184
Page 10 of 30
2.3 Analytical methods Liquid samples of MBfR were taken regularly from overflow bottle to determine the
185
concentrations of NH4+-N, NO2−-N and NO3−-N. The concentrations of nitrogenous
186
compounds in the samples were measured with a Lachat QuickChem 8000 Flow Injection
187
Analyzer (Lachat Instrument, Milwaukee, WI)28. The ammonium and nitrite removal rates
188
were determined based on the measured profiles. The total nitrogen removal rate of the
189
MBfR was determined by the ammonium removal rate ( RNH + , mg/L/d), the nitrite removal 4
190
rate ( RNO− , mg/L/d) and the nitrate accumulation rate ( RNO− , mg/L/d) based on the nitrogen 2
3
191
loading rate and effluent quality. Microbial community analysis showed that DAMO archaea,
192
Anammox bacteria and DAMO bacteria jointly dominated the microbial community in the
193
biofilm (see Section 3.3), suggesting that ammonium oxidation by Anammox (Reaction 1),
194
nitrite removal by DAMO bacteria (Reaction 2) and nitrate reduction by DAMO archaea
195
(Reaction 3) are the dominating nitrogen conversion reactions. The roles of heterotrophic
196
denitrifiers was also evaluated based on the theoretical biomass yields of the Anammox and
197
DAMO microorganisms29, biodegradability of yielded biomass27, and the amount of biomass
198
washed away with effluent (Supporting Information). The organic matter available for
199
denitrification in the MBfR was calculated as only 0.066 g COD/L/d at the final steady stage.
200
The contribution of heterotrophic denitrification to the total nitrogen removal rate was
201
estimated to be negligible (