Contribution of Leaf Litter to Nutrient Export during Winter Months in

Subscriber access provided by University of Newcastle, Australia

Article

Contribution of leaf litter to nutrient export during winter months in an urban residential watershed Anika Rose Bratt, Jacques C Finlay, Sarah E. Hobbie, Benjamin D. Janke, Adam C. Worm, and Kathrine L. Kemmitt Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b06299 • Publication Date (Web): 19 Feb 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on February 22, 2017

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Environmental Science & Technology is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 35

Environmental Science & Technology

1

Contribution of leaf litter to nutrient export during winter months in an urban residential

2

watershed

3

Authors: Anika R. Bratt*, Jacques C. Finlay, Sarah E. Hobbie, Benjamin D. Janke, Adam C.

4

Worm, Kathrine L. Kemmitt - Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, University of

5

Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108

6

*Corresponding author

7 8 9

Abstract Identification of non-point sources of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) in urban systems is

10

imperative to improve water quality and better manage eutrophication. Winter contributions and

11

sources of annual N and P loads from urban watersheds are poorly characterized in northern

12

cities because monitoring is often limited to warm weather periods. To determine winter export

13

of N and P, we monitored storm water outflow in a residential watershed in Saint Paul,

14

Minnesota during 2012-2014. Our data demonstrate that winter melt events contribute a high

15

percentage of annual N and P export (50%). We hypothesized that over-wintering leaf litter that

16

is not removed by fall street sweeping could be an important source to winter loads of N and P.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment


17

We estimated contributions of this source by studying decomposition in lawns, street gutters, and

18

catch basins during two winters. Rates of mass and N loss were negligible during both winters.

19

However, P was quickly solubilized from decomposing leaves. Using mass balances and

20

estimates of P leaching losses, we estimated that leaf litter could contribute 80% of winter TDP

21

loading in this watershed (~40% of annual TDP loading). Our work indicates that urban trees

22

adjacent to streets likely represent a major source of P pollution in northern cities. Management

23

that targets important winter sources such as tree leaves could be highly effective for reducing P

24

loading and may mitigate eutrophication in urban lakes and streams in developed cities.


Page 2 of 35

Page 3 of 35

25 26


Introduction Nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) are the most ubiquitous water pollutants1 and together

27

threaten the health of ecosystems at both local and global scales via downstream transport. Land

28

use changes associated with urban development play a dominant role in the high N and P inputs

29

to aquatic ecosystems that lead to eutrophication, especially at local scales2. The increase in

30

impervious (paved) surface cover associated with urbanization greatly influences hydrologic

31

pathways, creating a physical barrier to soils, decreasing infiltration and increasing runoff3. This

32

increase in runoff in combination with high nutrient concentrations in stormwater drives high

33

nutrient loading, especially of N and P, in urban waterways, which can be difficult to manage.

34

Point source pollution from wastewater effluent has been reduced in developed countries

35

due to improved technology and regulations; however, non-point pollution from storm sewers

36

can be an important source of nutrients as well. For example, in Baltimore, Groffman and others4

37

estimated that non-point sources contributed 25.6 kg N ha-1 yr-1, compared to 35 kg N h-1 yr-1

38

from point sources. Controlling non-point sources of N and P is difficult because they are diffuse,

39

hard to identify, and vary with space, time and climate5. This is especially true in urban centers

40

where non-point sources can range from construction sites to golf courses to private lawns and

41

include soils, fertilizer, atmospheric deposition, leaking sewers, pet waste, and leaf litter.

42

Traditional stormwater best management practices (BMPs, e.g. detention ponds,

43

vegetated swales, rain gardens) focus on volume and particulate reduction – typically

44

downstream rather than at the source – and can be expensive and are often ineffective (e.g. Song

45

et al.6). Some studies have shown that nearly half of urban P inputs are soluble7, and an

46

awareness of this fact has led to recent development of infiltration-based practices that are

47

designed to remove dissolved P (e.g. iron-enhanced sand filters; Erickson et al. 8, Arias et al.9).



48

Despite these innovations, there is increasing interest in managing N and P at the source7, but we

49

lack a clear understanding of the relative importance of non-point sources of nutrients in urban

50

landscapes. Without this basic understanding, we cannot assess how various management actions

51

will influence nutrient retention and transport.

52

Snowmelt runoff contributes significantly to nutrient loading in streams in northern

53

climates (e.g. Mitchell et al.10, Brooks and Williams11). The sources and dynamics of nutrient

54

transport during snowmelt are relatively well studied in forested watersheds, demonstrating that

55

freeze-thaw cycles and overland flow lead to nutrient losses from organic matter leaching and

56

soil microbes12,13. In contrast, knowledge of winter biogeochemical processes in northern urban

57

watersheds is much less advanced, in part due to reduced or suspended monitoring activity

58

during winter (however, see Kaushal et al.14 and Hall et al.15). Despite emphasis on warm season,

59

some studies have shown important contributions of winter urban runoff to pollutant loads (e.g.

60

Payne et al.16, Fallon & McNellis17, Oberts18, Brezonik & Stadlemann19). A recent study also

61

showed that urban BMP performance is impaired by winter conditions but also poorly

62

quantified20. Overall, far less is known about the sources and processes that control winter

63

transport of nutrient in urban watershed compared to summer, and compared to undisturbed

64

forests.

65

Decomposition of leaf litter can play a key role in nutrient availability in freshwater

66

ecosystems, releasing soluble forms of nitrogen and phosphorus to the water column21–23. In

67

urban landscapes, streams are often buried or channelized24, reducing the capacity for biotic

68

uptake of these nutrients25. In developed, residential watersheds, trees adjacent to streets drop

69

leaves and other organic matter directly into streets where they are carried via storm drains to

70

downstream aquatic features. In cities, streets, gutters and storm drains effectively act as


Page 4 of 35

Page 5 of 35


71

headwater streams, collecting and delivering nutrients downstream, yet they likely lack the

72

function of forested headwaters, which can retain and quickly process nutrients. The contribution

73

of leaf litter to watershed loading of nitrogen and phosphorus via these urban headwater streams

74

(i.e. street gutters) is likely important26. While decomposition of leaf litter has been studied in

75

urban landscapes (e.g. McDonnell et al.27), few studies have evaluated how leaf litter

76

decomposition on paved surfaces contributes to urban water quality28–31.

77

Municipal street sweeping is a common pollutant control measure, but its effectiveness

78

for improving water quality has not been evaluated thoroughly31,32. Prompt sweeping can be

79

especially important for P, as leaf litter leaches dissolved P quickly and can contribute to nutrient

80

loading in urban runoff33,34. Leaf litter decomposes faster in forested urban areas than in

81

undeveloped landscapes27, and rapid decomposition has been demonstrated in street gutters as

82

well35. Therefore, over time, release of N and P might occur faster than expected from estimates

83

based on reference landscapes such as forests or streams. Despite the potential importance of leaf

84

litter to local water quality, municipal street sweeping in temperate cities often occurs

85

infrequently (e.g., annually or semi-annually) in residential watersheds. The effectiveness of

86

infrequent sweeping is further hindered by the fact that the timing of leaf drop can vary greatly

87

by tree species. For example, ash trees drop their leaves within a few days in fall months, while

88

oak trees can drop leaves weeks to months later (e.g. Reich et al. 36). Due to differences in

89

phenology, climate variability, and timing of sweeping operations, some amount of leaf litter is

90

frequently not collected during fall municipal street sweeping and remains in street gutters. The

91

fate of this over-wintering leaf litter is unknown, but likely contributes to export of nutrients in

92

snowmelt.



93

In this paper we quantify snowmelt export of N and P and evaluate the contribution of

94

leaf litter to winter N and P loads in an urban, residential, storm-drained watershed, building off

95

previous work in this watershed35. To determine winter export of N and P, we monitored storm

96

water outflow and snowmelt in a residential watershed in Saint Paul, Minnesota during 2012-

97

2014. We studied leaf litter decomposition and nutrient release in street gutters, catch basins and

98

lawns in this watershed as well. Using these data sets and a model of leaf litter inputs, we

99

estimated the potential contribution of leaf litter to this winter export. Considering the physical

100

disconnect between soils and snowmelt flowpath caused by paved infrastructure, this research

101

addresses two key issues: (1) Does winter snowmelt contribute substantially to annual nutrient

102

loading in urban, residential watersheds as it does in forested watersheds? (2) Since leaf litter is

103

known to quickly leach P and is likely an important input to urban drainage, how much of

104

snowmelt P loading can be explained by over-wintering leaf litter in street gutters?

105 106 107

Methods Site description This study was conducted in a small, residential watershed in Saint Paul, Minnesota,

108

USA. The highly urbanized, residential watershed is 0.17 km2, with a total impervious area of

109

51% (sum of street, roof and other impervious percentages) and a vegetated area of 41%35. The

110

watershed drains into an underground BMP, the Arlington-Hamline Underground stormwater

111

vault (AHUG, Fig. 1). AHUG has no ponds, but it does contain multiple rain gardens and an

112

underground trench directly connected to storm drains engineered to promote infiltration and

113

reduce particulate nutrient export; however, since all of these BMPs are not connected to the

114

watershed outlet, we considered them disconnected from the watershed and they are not included

115

in total watershed area or estimates of nutrient and runoff volumes (see Fig. 1). There is no


Page 6 of 35

Page 7 of 35


116

baseflow35 and hydrology is flashy (median event duration is 5.0 hours), with runoff arising

117

exclusively from rainfall events or thaws (see SI for hydrographs).

118

The watershed was resurfaced, repaved, and all stormwater and sanitary infrastructure

119

was replaced in 2006. Sewage is not likely present in stormwater, as sanitary and storm sewers

120

are completely separate in the watershed. Additionally, E. coli levels are generally lower in

121

AHUG than in stormwater across other Capitol Region Watershed District (CRWD) sites37, and

122

no illicit discharges have been found in AHUG by CRWD. Molar N:P ratios observed in

123

stormwater (mean: 22.4; see SI) are several times higher than observed for sewage (~4-538).

124

Climate data

125

Daily maximum temperature and snow depth for winters 2012/13 and 2013/14 were

126

measured by the Minnesota State Climatology Office at a station 3 kilometers from AHUG

127

watershed. These data can be accessed at http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/climate/historical.

128

Watershed Nutrient Export

129

The study watershed is managed by CRWD and the city of St. Paul. CRWD monitors

130

storm drains and surface water in the watershed, including the inlet of the stormwater vault

131

(hereafter, the outlet of AHUG watershed), as temperatures permit (April –Nov.). Water samples

132

are collected with an ISCO automatic sampler (Model 6712; Lincoln, NE) equipped with an

133

area-velocity module (ISCO Model 750) to continuously record water depth and velocity in the

134

storm pipe. Sample bottles were removed within 24 hours of storm events and a single composite

135

storm sample was generated and processed within 24 hours of retrieval39.

136

We collaborated with CRWD to monitor the watershed outlet of AHUG year-round

137

beginning in May 2012. When low temperatures prevented use of an automated sampler, we

138

manually sampled events. The vault was outfitted with a flow logger year-round (ISCO Model



139

2150 during periods when auto-sampler was removed) for a complete record of water and

140

nutrient export from this watershed. Continuous outlet sampling only overlapped with our

141

decomposition study (described below) during winter 2012/13 (Dec. – March). We also sampled

142

fresh snowfall in AHUG on 13 Feb. 2011, 14 Feb. 2011, 23 Feb. 2011, 19 Nov. 2011, 22 Feb.

143

2013, 4 March 2013, and 12 April 2013 (7 events). Fresh snow was harvested using hand tools

144

and transferred to UMN in plastic gallon bags. Snow was then melted in same bags and

145

meltwater was filtered at the University of Minnesota (UMN) within 24 hours of collection.

146

Water quality analyses

147

Water quality analyses were conducted on warm season (April - Nov.) composite

148

samples collected by CRWD and analyzed at Metropolitan Council Environmental Services and

149

Pace Analytical39. During winter, and for additional samples collected during the warm season,

150

UMN staff collected composite and manual grab samples. A total of 215 flow events, including

151

both snowmelt (81 events) and rainfall-runoff (134 events), occurred over the study period (May

152

2012 – April 2014). 116 of these events, representing 84% of the total runoff volume, were

153

sampled by grab or by composite sampling (see table S-1 in the SI). Duplicate samples were run

154

for total dissolved phosphorus (TDP), soluble reactive P (SRP), nitrate and ammonium to ensure

155

comparability across laboratories and methods. Across 71 samples, no significant differences

156

were detected between labs (Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test, p2mm, i.e., leaf litter) and fine (

Contribution of Leaf Litter to Nutrient Export during Winter Months in

Recommend Documents