Correction to Effect of Ba Content on Oxygen Permeation Performance

Correction to Effect of Ba Content on Oxygen Permeation Performance of BaxSr1–xCo0.8Fe0.2O3-δ (x = 0.2, 0.5, and 0.8) Perovskite-Type Membrane. Moh...
3 downloads 5 Views 224KB Size
Addition/Correction pubs.acs.org/jced

Cite This: J. Chem. Eng. Data XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX

Correction to Effect of Ba Content on Oxygen Permeation Performance of BaxSr1−xCo0.8Fe0.2O3‑δ (x = 0.2, 0.5, and 0.8) Perovskite-Type Membrane Mohammad Ali Alaee, Mohammad Mehdi Movahednia, and Toraj Mohammadi* Research Centre for Membrane Separation processes, Faculty of Chemical Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Narmak, Tehran, Iran

J. Chem. Eng. Data, 2009, 54 (11), 3082−3091. DOI: 10.1021/je9001762

W

e should explain about some similarities between the current paper and our previous published work in another journal (High Temperature Materials & Processes, 2009, 28 (3), 181−190). These two works are native and independent but they are somewhat similar in shapes and structures. The descriptions are submitted as follows:

1. CONTENT OF THE PAPERS The papers are different in the experiments and consequently the obtained results. The published paper in Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data (JCED) investigates the effect of the Ba content on oxygen permeation performance of the fabricated perovskite-type membranes [BaxSr1−xCo0.8Fe0.2O3‑δ (x = 0.2, 0.5 and 0.8)] with the membrane thickness of 4.5 mm. It was found that the highest performance is achieved for the membrane with x = 0.8, that is, Ba0.8Sr0.2Co0.8Fe0.2O3‑δ. Whereas the published Paper in High Temperature Materials & Processes (HTMP) reports effect of the fabricated membranes thickness (4, 4.5, and 5 mm) on oxygen permeation rate at the constant Ba content (x = 0.5). Therefore, these two papers are different in their contents, although they have a common data with the Ba content of 0.5 and the membrane thickness of 4.5 mm. 2. MISLEADING FIGURES At first glance, it seems that Figures 6, 7, and 8 in the published paper in JCED and Figures 4, 5, and 6 in the other paper (published in HTMP) are respectively the same, but they are not. Indeed, the pointed figures are similar in shape, while they were prepared by different data sets reporting different results except for the one membrane data with the Ba content of 0.5 and the thickness of 4.5 mm.



AUTHOR INFORMATION

Corresponding Author

*E-mail: [email protected]. Tel.: + 98(21)77240496. Fax: + 98(21)77240495. ORCID

Toraj Mohammadi: 0000-0003-0455-3254

© XXXX American Chemical Society

A

DOI: 10.1021/acs.jced.8b00069 J. Chem. Eng. Data XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX