Correction to Improvements to Practical Usability of the “Crystalline

May 17, 2018 - Sponge” Method for Organic Structure Determination. Greyson W. Waldhart, Neal P. Mankad,* and Bernard D. Santarsiero*. Org. Lett. 201...
0 downloads 0 Views 204KB Size
Addition/Correction pubs.acs.org/OrgLett

Cite This: Org. Lett. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX

Correction to Improvements to Practical Usability of the “Crystalline Sponge” Method for Organic Structure Determination Greyson W. Waldhart, Neal P. Mankad,* and Bernard D. Santarsiero* Org. Lett. 2016, 18 (23), 6112−6115. DOI: 10.1021/acs.orglett.6b03119 S Supporting Information *

I

n the original manuscript, the concentrations of 2,6diisopropylaniline in di-n-butyl ether were tabulated incorrectly. The updated concentration values to not detract from, and actually reinforce, the conclusions drawn in the manuscript. Table 1 has been corrected. The following sentence just below Table 1 in the left-hand column was corrected: “The 1·PhNO2 crystals were exposed to solutions of DIPA in nBu2O that ranged from 0.005 to 4.8 M.” A corrected version of the complete Supporting Information has been submitted where the concentration values in Table S2 (page S6) have been corrected.



ASSOCIATED CONTENT

S Supporting Information *

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.orglett.8b01553. Corrected version of the complete Supporting Information file containing corrected concentration values in Table S2 (PDF) Table 1. Unit Cell Parameters entry a

1 2a 3b 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

sample

[DIPA]c

a (Å)

b (Å)

c (Å)

α (deg)

β (deg)

γ (deg)

1·PhNO2 1·DIPA 1·PhNO2 1·DIPA 1·DIPA 1·DIPA 1·DIPA 1·DIPA 1·DIPA 1·DIPA

− neat − 4.8 M 4.2 M 3.7 M 3.2 M 1.6 M 0.05 M 0.005 M

34.37 ± 0.77 36.39 ± 0.21 34.219(2) 36.966(7) 37.085(3) 37.024(5) 37.018(11) 37.174(19) 37.266(9) 37.167(11)

14.99 ± 0.10 14.70 ± 0.03 15.002(1) 14.695(8) 14.666(1) 14.718(2) 14.668(2) 14.764(2) 14.801(1) 14.799(2)

30.55 ± 0.41 30.53 ± 0.12 30.331(2) 30.906(4) 30.858(2) 30.883(9) 30.809(5) 30.539(6) 30.471(6) 30.481(5)

90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90

100.93 ± 0.83 101.90 ± 0.32 100.567(5) 102.626(4) 102.546(5) 102.706(13) 102.471(6) 102.885(21) 103.229(14) 102.987(17)

90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90

a

Reported as average ± standard deviation, calculated over 10 samples. bCrystals grown from 1:10 ZnI2/L mixture. See Table S1 for results from other ZnI2/L ratios. cConcentration of DIPA in nBu2O used for guest soaking. See Table S2 for results from other DIPA concentrations.

Received: May 17, 2018

© XXXX American Chemical Society

A

DOI: 10.1021/acs.orglett.8b01553 Org. Lett. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX