Correction to Trends in Adhesion Energies of Metal Nanoparticles on Oxide Surfaces: Understanding Support Effects in Catalysis and Nanotechnology Stephanie L. Hemmingson and Charles T. Campbell* ACS Nano 2017, 11 (2), 1196−1203. DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.6b07502
D
ue to an error caused by looking at the wrong row when we read this number from Table 1 in ref 73, we incorrectly stated the adsorption energy of Au monomers on MgO(100) as calculated by density functional theory (DFT) to be −0.42 eV, whereas the actual value is −0.89 eV. This requires two minor corrections in the article: 1. The first three lines in the right-hand column of page 1199 read: “... monomers to MgO(100) compared to CeO2(111) is consistent with DFT calculations, which for MgO(100) gives an adsorption energy of only −0.42 eV,73 well below the value...” This should instead read: “... monomers to MgO(100) compared to CeO2(111) is not consistent with DFT calculations, which for MgO(100) gives an adsorption energy of −0.89 eV,73 similar to the value...” 2. The value “−0.42 eV” on line 7 of the first full paragraph in the right-hand column of page 1200 should be changed to “− 0.89 eV”. This small change in this DFT energy does not affect any of the conclusions or discussions in this paper, except for the change in this one comparison that is made in the first correction above. That discussion is completely corrected by this change in wording above.
Received: March 24, 2017 Published: March 28, 2017 © 2017 American Chemical Society
4373
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.7b02045 ACS Nano 2017, 11, 4373−4373
Additions and Corrections
www.acsnano.org
