Subscriber access provided by NEW YORK UNIV
Article
Bioaccessibility vs. bioavailability of essential (Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn) and toxic (Pb) elements from phyto hyperaccumulator P. stratiotes - potential risk of dietary intake Zuzana #adková, Ji#ina Száková, Daniela Miholová, Barbora Horáková, Old#ich Kopecký, Daniela K#ivská, Iva Langrová, and Pavel Tlustos J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/jf5058099 • Publication Date (Web): 09 Feb 2015 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on February 18, 2015
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 47
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Bioaccessibility vs. bioavailability of essential (Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn) and toxic (Pb) elements from phyto hyperaccumulator P. stratiotes - potential risk of dietary intake Zuzana Čadková1, Jiřina Száková2, Daniela Miholová3, Barbora Horáková1, Oldřich Kopecký1, Daniela Křivská1, Iva Langrová1, Pavel Tlustoš2 1
Department of Zoology and Fisheries, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 957, Prague 6, 165 21, Czech Republic 2
Department of Agroenvironmental Chemistry and Plant Nutrition, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 957, Prague 6, 165 21, Czech Republic 3
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 957, Prague 6, 165 21, Czech Republic
Corresponding author: Čadková Zuzana Address: Department of Zoology and Fisheries, FAFNR, CULS Prague; Kamycka 957, Prague 6, 165 21, Czech Republic Phone: +420 224 383 451 e-mail:
[email protected] 1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 2 of 47
1
Abstract
2
Aquatic weeds are widely used as animal feed in developing countries. However, information
3
concerning element bioavailability from these plants is lacking. A combination of an in vitro
4
method (PBET) and an in vivo feeding trial was conducted in the present study in order to
5
investigate potential element bioaccessibility and estimated bioavailability from Pistia
6
stratiotes (PS). Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn and Pb concentrations in PS biomass, artificial gastrointestinal
7
fluids and rat tissues were determined using ET-AAS and ICP-OES. PS exhibited elevated Fe,
8
Mn and Pb levels. The PBET revealed high bioaccessibility of all monitored elements from
9
PS biomass. The results of the in vivo trial were inconsistent with those of the PBET, because
10
animals fed PS exhibited low levels of essential elements in the tissues. The consumption of a
11
PS supplemented diet significantly decreased total Fe levels and increased total Pb
12
accumulation in exposed animals. Significantly reduced amounts of essential elements in the
13
intestinal walls indicated a potential disruption in nutrient gastrointestinal absorption in
14
animals fed PS.
15
16 17
18
19
20
Key words:
21
Pistia stratiotes, microelements, risk elements, biokinetics, physiologically based extraction
22
test, feeding trial
2 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 3 of 47
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
23
Introduction
24
Due to a crucial shortage of livestock fodder in developing countries of tropical and
25
subtropical regions, utilizing aquatic plants as animal feed seems to be a suitable option.
26
Aquatic plant cultivation is cheap and less-laborious than conventional plant production, and
27
it is less demanding on agricultural land. It is also very effective since most aquatic plants
28
used as animal feed comprise water weeds with exceptional biomass productivity under
29
favorable conditions. On the other hand, such plant species are able to grow in poor
30
environmental condition, e.g., contaminated sewage canals, eutrophic water reservoirs etc1.
31
Biota, living at these polluted sites, can be threatened by a high level of risk elements in the
32
aquatic environment2, 3, 4.
33
Although FEEDIPEDIA, a compendium of up-to-date information on feed resources, lists just
34
8 aquatic plants as animal forage, a broader spectrum is used world-wide, in which the most
35
common species are water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) and duckweed (Lemnacae family).
36
Based on their nutritional values and digestibility, 12 aquatic plants have been considered
37
potential livestock feed5. Apart from conventional aquatic fodder, this list also includes Pistia
38
stratiotes (PS).
39
Pistia stratiotes (L. 1753), often referred to as water cabbage, water lettuce, Nile cabbage, or
40
shellflower, is a floating perennial macrophyte from the family Araceae. It consists of a
41
rosette of leaf blades that arise from a central meristem (a very short stem axis) and long
42
feathery roots. P. stratiotes is native to South America, most likely Brazil. However, this
43
species currently occurs in nearly all tropical and subtropical fresh waterways and water
44
reservoirs, and has been included in the Global Invasive Species Database6, 7.
45
PS is traditionally used for pig, cattle and duck food in China, Malaysia and Singapore8. A
46
comprehensive feeding trial with whole PS plants was also conducted under controlled 3 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 4 of 47
47
conditions on adult cattle, sheep, goats, horses, pigs and albino rats9. Water lettuce can
48
possibly be used to produce Se-enriched plants for animal nutrition10. Moreover, leaf protein
49
extracted form PS leaves significantly improves the nutritional value of protein deficient diet
50
in ruminants, monogastric livestock and humans, because its digestibility (in vitro as well as
51
in vivo) is even higher than that of other aquatic weeds11,12. Finally, fibrous byproducts from
52
protein extraction could be utilized as an additional food for ruminants. Since PS has been the
53
subject of miscellaneous studies, the basic nutritional values of this plant from former studies
54
as well as from our study are shown in Table 1.
55
However, the use of PS as livestock feed has a potential limitation because the plant is
56
reported to accumulate considerable quantities of heavy metals, and it even possesses hyper-
57
accumulative properties for several risk elements such as Cd, Hg and Pb13. Whereas Pb
58
concentration in conventional plants is usually very low, Pb levels in PS growing on polluted
59
areas can increase by up to 1.4814 and 15.76 mg.kg-1 15. Moreover, (cultivation in 1 mmol L−1
60
Pb solution), an incredibly high Pb concentration of 203 g.kg-1 was observed16 under artificial
61
conditions.
62
The EU Directive 2002/32/EC17 set the maximum permissible limits for Pb in green fodder at
63
30 mg.kg-1. However, even slightly increased levels of this metal in forage crops may
64
negatively affect the health of both animal and human consumers because Pb is toxic to the
65
organism, even when absorbed in small amounts. Recently, it has been demonstrated that the
66
trace element toxicity of food is dependent on more than just their total concentration.
67
Regarding the risk of feed intake, the bioaccesssibility and bioavailability of trace elements
68
are crucial factors. Bioaccessibility (BAC) is theoretically the amount of substance that is
69
soluble in the gastrointestinal environment, i.e., fraction that is released from the matrix into
70
the gastrointestinal tract during the digestion process and, thus, becomes available for
71
intestinal absorption and can enter the blood stream18. Bioavailability (BAV) is the general 4 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 5 of 47
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
72
term used to describe the absorption of a contaminant into the body of an exposed subject.
73
Absolute bioavailability (ABAV) is the proportion of the contaminant in the administered
74
dose that is absorbed into the test organism.
75
To evaluate bioaccessible fractions of contaminants, several in vitro approaches have been
76
developed in attempts to mimic the effects of the digestion process in mammals. Generally,
77
these approaches are commonly called simulated in vitro gastro-intestinal extraction
78
procedures. The physiologically based extraction test (PBET), an in vitro test system for
79
predicting the bioavailability of metals from a solid matrix, is the most widely used to date.
80
The PBET was designed primarily to evaluate the absolute risk element bioavailability from
81
contaminated soil in the digestive tracts of children19. However, various modifications of this
82
original technique have been recently carried out. Concerning risk element bioaccessibility in
83
animal and human food, the PBET was previously used to determine bioaccessible portions of
84
both essential and toxic elements in contaminated plant samples20,21, seaweed22, medicinal
85
plants23, raw vegetables24, uncooked rice25, cooked vegetable soup26, walnuts27 and mussel
86
tissue28. However, to the best of our knowledge, both the BAC and BAV of trace elements
87
have never been evaluated simultaneously in any phyto hyper-accumulators, including P.
88
stratiotes.
89
Because data concerning the total concentrations of both essential and risk elements in
90
contaminated plant material provide little information about the possible nutritional values
91
and toxic effects of this kind of forage, the PBET can be a useful tool in assessing the
92
potential risk of its diet intake. Nevertheless, the results of in vitro procedures should always
93
be accompanied and confirmed by in vivo trials. Therefore, the aims of this study were as
94
follows: i.) to determine potential bioaccessibility and real bioavailability of both essential
95
and risk elements from P. stratiotes; and ii.) to determine the effect of P. stratiotes biomass
96
feed intake on element accumulation in mammalian organisms. For this purpose, an in vitro 5 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 6 of 47
97
PBET using artificial digestive solutions was conducted, followed by an in vivo feeding trial
98
on laboratory rats. In the course of this experiment, essential (Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn) and risk (Pb)
99
element levels were determined within a simulated gastrointestinal tract and within several rat
100
tissues (liver, kidney, muscle, bone, intestinal wall).
101
102
Material and methods
103
Chemicals
104
Nitric acid 65%, p.a. ISO (Merck)
105
H2O2 30%, TraceSelect (Fluka)
106
Standard solution ASTASOL - CZ9098MN1 (Analytika, CR)
107
Ammonium dihydrogen phosphate GR (Merck)
108
Certified reference material BRC 12-02-01 (Bovine liver)
109
110
Apparatus
111
MWS-3+ microwave digestion system (Berghof Products+ Instruments, Germany) equipped
112
with Teflon digestion vessel DAP-60S
113
Atomic absorption spectrometer with electrothermal atomization (ET-AAS, Varian AA 280Z,
114
Australia) with a graphite tube atomizer GTA 120 and a PSD 120 programmable sample
115
dispenserInductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-OES, Varian
116
VistaPro, Australia) equipped with a two channel peristaltic pump, a Struman-Masters spray
117
chamber and a V-groove pneumatic nebulizer made of inert material.
6 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 7 of 47
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
118
In vitro evaluation of bioaccessibility
119
The PBET20 was performed to assess bioaccessible portions of elements in the gastrointestinal
120
tract as follows:
121
i)
122
0.84 mL of lactic acid and 1 mL of acetic acid was mixed with deionized water. The pH of the
123
mixture was adjusted with concentrated HCl to 2.5 (± 0.05). Then 0.5 g of sample was mixed
124
in an 85 mL polypropylene bottle with 50 mL of the prepared gastric solution. The bottle was
125
placed in a shaker bath at 37 °C and shaken for 1 hour at 150 rpm. After centrifugation, a 5
126
mL aliquot was taken off and measured for element content.
127
ii)
128
reaction mixture, and the pH was adjusted to 7 with a saturated NaHCO3 solution. Later, 25
129
mg of pancreatin and 87.5 mg of bile salts were added. The sample was again shaken in the
130
bath for 2 hours, centrifuged, and the extract was then measured. The element contents in the
131
extracts were determined by ICP-OES. Bioaccessible portions of Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn and Pb were
132
expressed as a percentage of total element concentration in both the control diet and P.
133
stratiotes biomass.
134
In vivo evaluation of bioavailability
135
Experimental animals and diet
136
Adult male Wistar rats (Rattus norvegicus) were used as models for bioavailability
137
evaluation. The animals were obtained from a commercial supplier (Institute of Physiology of
138
the AS CR, Prague, Czech Republic) and randomly divided into 2 groups based on plant
139
material intake: CO – commercial diet only (n=6), PS – P. stratiotes intake (n=9). The rats
140
were placed separately into plastic metabolic cages (TecniPlast, Italy) and left to acclimatize
Gastric solution - 1L volumetric flask: 1.25 g pepsin, 0.5 g of citric acid, 0.5 g malate,
Pancreatic solution: 5 mL of the fresh gastric solution was added to the remaining
7 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 8 of 47
141
for 7 days. They were kept in controlled conditions (temperature of 22±2 °C; 12/12 hours
142
light/dark cycle), given commercial feed and allowed to drink tap water ad libitum.
143
A complete feed mixture for SPF breeding rats was purchased from a commercial supplier
144
(Velaz s.r.o., Czech Republic) and used as a control diet. The nutritional values, as declared
145
by the manufacturer, are as follows: Moisture – 12.5 %; Nitrogenous compounds – 24 %;
146
Fiber – 4.4 %; Fat – 3.4 %; Ash – 6.8 %; Lysin 14g; Methionin 4.8g; Ca – 11g; P – 7.2g; Na
147
– 1.8g; Cu – 20 mg; Se – 0,38 mg DW. The PS supplemented diet was prepared as follows: P.
148
stratiotes specimens were cultivated in a Pb-enriched medium under greenhouse conditions29,
149
harvested biomass was dried, dry mass was ground to a fine powder and each single dose (25
150
mg) was then weighed and thoroughly mixed with 25 g of commercial feed. These batches
151
were administered to rats daily for a period of 6 weeks. PS biomass constituted approximately
152
0.1 % of the feed ration. Data concerning feed consumption was recorded daily (see Table 3),
153
whereas individual animal weight gain was recorded twice a week (Figure 1).
154
All experiments with laboratory animals were conducted in compliance with the current laws
155
of the Czech Republic (Act No. 246/1992 coll. on Protection Animals against Cruelty) and
156
EC Directive 86/609/EEC. The experimental project was approved by the committee of the
157
Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports, Czech Republic (approval code MSMT-
158
31220/2014-7). Animal care was supervised by authorized personnel: Zuzana Čadková,
159
Ph.D., recipient of the Central Commission for Animal Welfare Certificate No. CZ 02201.
160
Element analysis of rat tissues
161
At the end of feeding trial, experimental animals were euthanized. Individual autopsies were
162
carried out with Teflon® instruments in order to obtain appropriate tissue samples (liver,
163
kidney, testes, duodenal wall, femoral muscle and bone) for element analyses. All tissues
164
were weighed, properly washed in redistilled water, placed into Petri dishes and stored at a
8 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 9 of 47
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
165
temperature of -20°C until they underwent chemical analysis. Prior to element analysis, tissue
166
samples (except bones) were freeze-dried and microwave digested in an acid-based mixture
167
using MWS-3+ microwave digestion system (Berghof Products+ Instruments, Germany). The
168
ET-AAS technique was used to determine element concentrations in all digested tissue
169
samples of control groups, as well as in the liver, muscle, testes and intestinal wall of PS
170
exposed groups30. The calibration curve for the measurement was prepared using the standard
171
solution ASTASOL CZ9098MN1 (Analytika, CR). The evaluation of the obtained data was
172
carried out using a standard addition method, and ammonium dihydrogen phosphate GR
173
(Merck) was used as a matrix modifier. Samples with elevated Pb levels (kidneys and bones),
174
along with the total element content in the PS biomass and in the control diet, were analyzed
175
using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES, Varian VistaPro,
176
Australia). Certified reference material BRC 12-02-01 (Bovine liver) was simultaneously
177
analyzed under the same conditions to assess analytical data quality (Table 2). Experimental
178
data were adjusted using the mean element concentrations in blanks (± 3 SD of blanks), which
179
were prepared under the same conditions as were the tissues samples. Tissue samples were
180
analyzed in two replicates, which were averaged for subsequent statistical processing. The
181
relative element concentration in rat tissues was expressed in mg.kg-1 dry weight
182
Total element levels in rat tissues
183
Total amounts of particular elements accumulated in rat tissues were determined using the
184
element concentrations (mg.kg-1 fresh weight) together with the weight coefficient of
185
individual rat tissues31, according to the following formula:
186
TEAT (mg) = EC (mg.kg-1 FW) × animal weight (kg) × SOWC × 10-2
187
TEAT – total element amount in tissue
188
EC – element concentration
9 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 10 of 47
189
FW – fresh weight
190
SOWC – specific organ weight coefficient31
191
Additionally, P - portions (%) of the total Pb intake accumulated in a particular animal tissues
192
were determined according to the folowing formula:
193
P(%) = TEAT (mg) / TI (mg) × 100
194
TI – total intake
195
Statistical procedure
196
Data obtained from the in vitro PBET was assessed in statistical software Statistica, ver. 1232
197
using the Student´s T-test for dependent variables. Results of the in vivo feeding trial
198
(differences in element tissue accumulations between animals from CO and PS groups) were
199
analyzed using R statistical software, ver. 3.1.133. Due to the low number of animals used in
200
our experiment (n = 15) and a significant number of potential interactions, we used separate
201
tests for each monitored element. The basic lme model tested general influence of fixed effect
202
“group” (CO vs. PS) with control for random effect “animal” with nested factor “organ”. The
203
influence of individual animal variability was tested using AIC value comparison between a
204
model that includes factor “animal” and a simplified model without this factor. In all cases
205
(Cu, Fe, Mn, Pb and Zn) AIC differences exceeded 50, favoring simpler model. Finally, after
206
factorial ANOVA with factors “group” and “organ”, post-hoc Tukey HSD tests were used to
207
determine effect of diet (CO vs. PS) on element concentrations in particular organs. An
208
analogical approach was used for evaluation of differences in TAET values between PS and
209
CO animals. To fit normality, data were log-transformed before applying the statistical
210
models. However, in order to show the patterns more clearly, original values were presented
211
in graphs and tables. The threshold for statistical significance was set at α = 0.05.
212 10 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 11 of 47
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
213
Results
214
During the course of our experiment, the supplementing of daily feed rations with 0.1 % of PS
215
dry mass did not significantly affect animal weight gains (T-test; CO vs. PS group; see Figure
216
1). The individual variance was mainly caused by non-uniform initial animal weights at the
217
beginning of the experiment. Figure 1 shows that individual variation actually decreased
218
during the feeding trial.
219
Total and extracted element concentrations
220
Artificially cultivated P. stratiotes dry mass contained significantly higher Fe, Mn and Pb
221
concentrations than did the control pellet feed. All 3 element concentrations were also
222
significantly higher in the medium that simulated the gastric phase of PS digestion (pepsin
223
extraction). In the artificial intestinal environment (pancreatin extraction), PS digest showed
224
significantly higher concentrations of all of the monitored elements - Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn and Pb
225
(Table 4).
226
In vitro bioaccessibility
227
The PBET revealed that element extraction from PS biomass during the digestive process
228
differs from that of conventional feed (Figure 2, 3). In control feed, the BAC (%) of the
229
majority of the monitored elements (Cu, Mn, Zn and Pb) was higher (25 – 53 %) in the gastric
230
phase than in the intestinal fluid (9 – 20 %). The most significant decrease was observed for
231
Zn - more than a five-fold decrease (from 53 % in GP to 9 % in IP). Fe BAC (%) from control
232
feed showed a trend opposite to previous elements. It was extremely low in GP (1%) and
233
increased to 5 % in a simulated intestinal environment. In PS biomass, the BAC (%) of all
234
essential elements decreased significantly during the transition from the gastric phase (5 – 73
235
%) to the intestinal phase (3 – 31 %). As with control feed BAC, Fe BAC in PS was very low
236
(5 % in GP and 3 % in IP), and Zn BAC dropped considerably (from 73 to 31 %). Unlike to 11 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 12 of 47
237
control feed digestion, PS feed digestion exhibited almost twice the Pb BAC levels in the
238
gastric phase (5 %) than in the intestinal fluid (9 %).
239
In vivo bioavailability
240
Element accumulation in rat tissues was expressed in two ways: i.) relative concentration in
241
mg.kg-1 DW (Table 5) and ii.) total amount in milligrams - TEAT (Figures 4A-F and 5). PS
242
biomass intake affected element bio-kinetics in a rat organism. Supplementing the diet with
243
Pb-loaded PS caused a significant increase in total Pb accumulation (lme, F = 38.332, p