Development of a QuEChERS-Based Method for Determination of

Feb 20, 2017 - Carcinogenic 2‑Nitrofluorene and 1‑Nitropyrene in Rice Grains and ... by the validated method revealed 1-nitropyrene and 2-nitroflu...
0 downloads 0 Views 832KB Size
Subscriber access provided by BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIV

Article

Development of a QuEChERS-Based Method for the Determination of Carcinogenic 2-Nitrofluorene and 1-Nitropyrene in Rice Grains and Vegetables: A Comparative Study with Benzo[a]pyrene Kailin Deng, and Wan Chan J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b00051 • Publication Date (Web): 20 Feb 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on February 22, 2017

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 39

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Development of a QuEChERS-Based Method for the Determination of Carcinogenic 2-Nitrofluorene and 1-Nitropyrene in Rice Grains and Vegetables: A Comparative Study with Benzo[a]pyrene

Kailin Deng† and Wan Chan *,†,‡



Environmental Science Programs and ‡ Department of Chemistry, The Hong Kong

University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong

* Corresponding author (Tel: +852 2358-7370; Fax: +852-2358-1594; E-mail: [email protected])

1

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 2 of 39

1

ABSTRACT

2

Nitrated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (nitro-PAHs) are ubiquitous

3

environmental pollutants attracting increasing attention because of their potent

4

mutagenicity to humans. Previous studies of nitro-PAHs focused on investigating

5

their formation mechanisms and detecting them in atmospheric environment, however,

6

few studies reported their occurrence in food samples and regulations on nitro-PAHs

7

are still lacking. We report in this study the development and application of a Quick,

8

Easy, Cheap, Effective, Rugged, and Safe (QuEChERS) method for the determination

9

of nitro-PAHs in rice and vegetable samples. The analysis of the collected samples by

10

the validated method revealed 1-nitropyrene and 2-nitrofluorene were widespread

11

food contaminants. A comparative study with benzo[a]pyrene, the commonly used

12

marker for PAH exposure, showed that carcinogenic nitro-PAHs existed in rice and

13

vegetables at similar concentrations. Dietary exposure risk, which was estimated

14

based on the surveillance data, suggested 3.28-5.03 ng/kg/day of nitro-PAHs exposure

15

for Hong Kong citizens from rice grains and vegetables.

16 17

Keywords: QuEChERS; Nitro-PAHs; Rice; Vegetables; HPLC-FLD; Dietary exposure

2

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 3 of 39

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

18

INTRODUCTION

19

Nitrated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (nitro-PAHs) are ubiquitous

20

environmental pollutants formed by multiple pathways,1 for example, during

21

incomplete combustion of fossil fuels, nitro-PAHs are produced and emitted in the

22

exhaust,2,3 while emerging evidence also suggested that polycyclic aromatic

23

hydrocarbons (PAHs) in the atmosphere could react with N2O5, NO2, and NO3

24

radicals to generate nitro-PAHs.4-6 Although present in smaller quantities than PAHs

25

in the ambient environment, nitro-PAHs are still of concerns to human health due to

26

their potent mutagenic and carcinogenic properties.7,8 For example, 1-nitropyrene, 1

27

(Figure 1), a highly specific marker molecule for diesel exhaust, is classified by the

28

International Agency for Research on Cancer as a probable cancer causing agent to

29

humans.9

30

Unlike PAHs which can only form mutagenic DNA adducts after hepatic oxidative

31

activation,10 toxicology studies indicated that nitro-PAHs (e.g. 1-nitropyrene) can

32

form covalently-bonded adducts with DNA through dual pathways;11 Reaction with

33

2'-deoxyguanosine in DNA can occur through reactive intermediates generated from a

34

ring oxidation or a nitro-reduction process.12 Having two pathways to produce

35

covalently-bonded DNA adducts render nitro-PAHs more potent carcinogens than

36

PAHs.

37

Food ingestion has been proven to be the predominant pathway for PAHs exposure

3

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 4 of 39

38

to non-smokers.13-15 However, previous studies of nitro-PAHs focused on atmospheric

39

samples (gas-phase and particulate matter).4,16,17 Few studies reported on the

40

quantitative determination of nitro-PAHs in food products, presumably due to their

41

low concentrations and the complexity of the matrix.18,19 Thus, simple and effective

42

methods capable of analyzing nitro-PAHs in food samples are urgently needed to

43

obtain monitoring data.

44

We recently developed a high-performance liquid chromatography method with

45

fluorescence detection (HPLC-FLD) for the analysis of nitro-PAHs in meat

46

products.20 The method utilizes Fe/H+-induced nitro-reduction to convert

47

non-fluorescing nitro-PAHs to strongly fluorescing amino-PAHs for their sensitive

48

detection using FLD. In this work, we modified and extended the application of the

49

method to investigate the concentration of 1 and 2-nitrofluorene, 2, the model

50

substances of carcinogenic nitro-PAHs,21,22 in jasmine rice and vegetables collected

51

from supermarkets in Hong Kong and mainland China. Specifically, a Quick, Easy,

52

Cheap, Effective, Rugged, and Safe (QuEChERS) based method was developed and

53

used in this study to quantitate nitro-PAHs in food products. Compared to

54

conventional gas chromatography-mass spectrometric-based methods that are

55

time-demanding, labor-intensive, and solvent-consuming,23,24 the QuEChERS-based

56

sample preparation takes only several minutes and uses merely 10 mL of acetonitrile

57

for each sample,25 yet both methods have similar analytical sensitivities.18 With the

58

goal of better understanding the relative concentration and dietary exposure risk of 4

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 5 of 39

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

59

PAHs and nitro-PAHs in food products, a comparative analysis of benzo[a]pyrene, 3,

60

the molecular indicator of carcinogenic PAH,26, 27 was also performed.

61 62 63

MATERIALS AND METHODS Chemicals and Reagents. All chemicals and reagents used were of the highest

64

purity available and were used without further purification. Iron powder, glacial acetic

65

acid, 2-nitrofluorene, 1-nitropyrene, and benzo[a]pyrene were purchased from Sigma

66

(St. Louis, MO). Primary and secondary amine (PSA) sorbent was obtained from

67

Agela Technologies (Tianjin, China). HPLC-grade acetonitrile was acquired from

68

Tedia (Fairfield, OH). Deionized water was further purified by a Milli-Q Ultrapure

69

water purification system (Billerica, MA) and used in the entire study.

70

Sample Collection. Food samples (vegetables n=18; rice, n=14) were obtained

71

randomly from supermarkets in Hong Kong and Shenzhen (Guangdong, China). The

72

samples were sealed in polypropylene bags immediately upon sampling. Vegetables

73

and rice grains were kept at 0 oC and transported to the laboratory where they were

74

stored in -20 oC freezer before being processed. Prior to analysis, the samples were

75

washed with purified water (for vegetable samples), blot dried, homogenized in their

76

raw state, and prepared by a QuEChERS-based method as described below.

77 78

Sample Preparation. QuEChERS sample extraction. A dispersive solid phase extraction (d-SPE) based QuEChERS sample preparation method was developed and 5

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

79

used in this study. In brief, 10 g of homogenized vegetable/rice samples were

80

accurately weighed in a 50 mL Falcon tube. Acetonitrile (10 mL) was then added to

81

the samples and the sample solution was ultrasonicated at room temperature for 30

82

min. Sodium chloride (1 g) and anhydrous magnesium sulfate (4 g) were then added

83

to the samples and mixed by vortex.

84

Page 6 of 39

d-SPE Clean-up. After centrifugation at 3800 rpm for 5 min, 1 mL of the

85

supernatant was extracted and put into a 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tube containing PSA

86

sorbent (30 mg) and anhydrous magnesium sulfate (150 mg). The samples after

87

vortex mixing for 1 min were centrifuged at 13800 rpm for 10 min to settle the PSA.

88

The supernatant was then transferred into 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tube and dried

89

under N2 stream for Fe/H+ treatment.

90

Fe/H+ Treatment. The sample extracts after QuEChERS extraction and d-SPE

91

clean-up were treated with Fe/H+ to reduce the non-fluorescing nitro-PAHs to their

92

corresponding amino-PAHs (Figure 2). Nitro-reduction of nitro-PAHs to amino-PAHs

93

was performed essentially as described previously,20 with modification. In brief, the

94

concentrated sample extracts were re-dissolved in 200 µL of 15% acetic acid in

95

methanol (v/v) and iron powder (10 mg) was then added. The sample mixtures were

96

vortexed for 20 min to reduce 1 and 2 to 1-aminopyrene, 4, and 2-aminofluorene, 5,

97

respectively (Figure 2). The Fe/H+-treated samples were centrifuged at 13,800 rpm for

98

10 min before the supernatant was transferred to an HPLC vial for HPLC-FLD

99

analysis. 6

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 7 of 39

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

100

HPLC-FLD Analysis. HPLC-FLD analysis was performed on an Agilent 1260

101

Infinity LC system (Palo Alto, CA). Ten microliter of the Fe/H+-treated sample extract

102

was injected on a 150 mm x 2.0 mm i.d., 5 µm, GraceSmart RP-18 column (Grace,

103

Deerfield, IL) thermostated at 40 °C for chromatographic separation. The column was

104

eluted with a binary solvent system, with solvent A being water, solvent B being

105

acetonitrile. Gradient elution at constant flow rate of 0.4 mL/min was adopted, with

106

the solvent gradient as follows: 30% B programmed linearly to 100% B in 12 min and

107

held for another 5 min before re-conditioning. The HPLC was coupled to an Agilent

108

1100 programmable FLD (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA) with the FLD

109

time-programmed at excitation/emission wavelengths (λex/ λem) as follows: 0-7.5 min:

110

λex 280 and λem 370nm; 7.5-10min: λex 240 and λem 435 nm; 10-15 min: λex 260 and

111

λem 410 nm.

112

Calibration and Method Validation. A stock solution mixture of 1-3 each at 1000

113

mg/L was prepared in acetonitrile and stored at -20 °C until used. Working standard

114

solution mixtures of individual analytes at 0.005, 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, and 1.0 µg/mL

115

were prepared by serial dilution of the stock solution with methanol. Working

116

standard solution (100 µL) was dried under N2 gas stream, to which 200µL of 15%

117

acetic acid in methanol (v/v) and 10 mg of iron powder were added. The standard

118

solution mixtures were vortexed at room temperature for 20 min before being

119

analyzed using the HPLC-FLD method described above. While calibration curves for

120

nitro-PAHs (1 and 2) were established by plotting the peak areas of their 7

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

121

corresponding amino-PAH derivative against the concentrations of nitro-PAH in the

122

calibration standard solutions, that for 3 was established by plotting their

123

corresponding peak areas against its concentration in the working standard solutions.

124

Page 8 of 39

The developed method was evaluated for sensitivity, precision, and recovery. The

125

limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantitation (LOQ) were established as the

126

amount of the analyte that generated a signal 3 and 10 times that of the noise level at

127

0.005µg/mL, respectively.28 The method precision was evaluated by analyzing rice,

128

radish, and lettuce spiked with standard mixture at two different concentrations (0.5

129

and 5.0 µg/kg), on the same day (n = 5) and over separate days in a month (n = 5).

130

The method recovery was evaluated by spiking the nitro-PAHs and PAHs to samples

131

(0.5 and 5.0 µg/kg), extracted by QuEChERS clean-up method, processed with Fe/H+,

132

and analyzed by HPLC-FLD as described above. It is worth noting that the real

133

samples may have lower extractability than spiked samples, so that after spiking the

134

analytes, samples were mixed for 1 h before being processed to mimic the situation.

135

Dietary Exposure Risk Assessment. Dietary exposure level (ED) was calculated

136

based on standard Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) methodologies,27,29,30

137

by:

 =

C × IR  (Eqn.1)

138

where Ci is the concentration of individual NPAH/PAH in food i (µg/kg);

139

IR represents ingestion amount of food i per day (kg/day), BW represents body weight 8

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 9 of 39

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

140

in kg. Food consumption and body weight data were obtained from the Hong Kong

141

food consumption survey (2005-2007) based on 24-h food recalls.31 In this survey, the

142

database covered adult and senior population (20-84 years old; n=5394,000), mean

143

value of body weight was 61.25 kg for Hong Kong citizens. Regarding the monitoring

144

data in this study, two different scenarios (lower [LB] and upper bound [UB]) related

145

to the treatment of the non-detects (NDs) and values below the limit of quantitation

146

(