Subscriber access provided by SUNY DOWNSTATE
Article
Dietary phenolic compounds selectively inhibit activities of individual subunits of Maltase-Glucoamylase and Sucrase-Isomaltase for modulating glucose release Meric Simsek, Roberto Quezada-Calvillo, Mario G. Ferruzzi, Buford Nichols, and Bruce R. Hamaker J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • Publication Date (Web): 30 Mar 2015 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on March 30, 2015
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 31
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Dietary phenolic compounds selectively inhibit the individual subunits of MaltaseGlucoamylase and Sucrase-Isomaltase with the potential of modulating glucose release
Meric Simsek1, Roberto Quezada-Calvillo2,3, Mario G. Ferruzzi1, Buford L. Nichols3, Bruce R. Hamaker1*
1
Whistler Center for Carbohydrate Research and Department of Food Science, Purdue
University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA 2
Department of Chemistry, Universidad Autonoma de San Luis Potosi, SLP, Mexico
3
USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Children’s Nutrition Research Center, Department of
Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
*Correspondence: Professor Bruce R. Hamaker, Phone: 765-494-5668, Fax: 765-494-7953, Email:
[email protected] 1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
1
Page 2 of 31
ABSTRACT
2
In this study, we hypothesized that dietary phenolic compounds selectively inhibit the
3
individual C- and N-terminal (Ct, Nt) subunits of the two small intestinal α-glucosidases,
4
Maltase-Glucoamylase (MGAM) and Sucrase-Isomaltase (SI), for a modulated glycemic
5
carbohydrate digestion. The inhibition by chlorogenic acid, caffeic acid, gallic acid, (+)-catechin,
6
and (-)-epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) on individual recombinant human Nt-MGAM and Nt-
7
SI, and mouse Ct-MGAM and Ct-SI, was assayed using maltose as the substrate. Inhibition
8
constants, inhibition mechanisms, and IC50 values for the each combination of phenolic
9
compound and enzymatic subunit were determined. EGCG and chlorogenic acid were found to
10
be more potent inhibitors for selectively inhibiting the two subunits with highest activity, Ct-
11
MGAM and Ct-SI. All compounds displayed non-competitive type inhibition. Inhibition of fast-
12
digesting Ct-MGAM and Ct-SI by EGCG and chlorogenic acid could lead to a slow, but
13
complete, digestion of starch for improved glycemic response of starchy foods with potential
14
health benefit.
15
Key words: α-glucosidases, inhibition, Maltase-Glucoamylase, phenolics, Sucrase-Isomaltase
16
17
18
2 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 3 of 31
19
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
INTRODUCTION
20
Starchy foods are a major component of the human diet and provide a large portion of
21
energy intake. Starch is digested into the glucose by six different enzyme activities: salivary and
22
pancreatic α-amylase; and the α-glucosidases Maltase-Glucoamylase (MGAM) and Sucrase-
23
Isomaltase (SI), each composed of two active subunits located on the respective C and N
24
terminals (Ct, Nt) of their original protein. The first step in starch digestion is performed by
25
salivary and pancreatic α-amylases, with production of linear glucose oligomers and branched α-
26
limit dextrins, and very little free glucose.1 The α-amylase degradation products are further
27
hydrolyzed into free glucose by the mucosal α-1,4 exoglucosidases MGAM and SI, located on
28
the small intestinal brush border membrane.2
29
MGAM and SI enzyme complexes belong to the GH31 family of glucohydrolases. The
30
Nt subunit of both MGAM and SI attach these enzyme complexes to the apical membrane of
31
small intestinal enterocytes through an O-glycosylated stalk domain.3 Although all four subunits
32
have high α-1,4-exoglucosidic activity,4,5 each MGAM and SI subunit has different α-glucosidic
33
catalytic properties related to their independent active sites; therefore, their contribution to
34
glucose production from glycemic carbohydrates is different.1,6 Ct-SI and Nt-SI subunits display
35
distinctive sucrase and isomaltase activities, respectively. In MGAM, Ct and Nt subunits share
36
activities against linear glucose oligomers, but the higher activity of Ct-MGAM on longer
37
glucose oligomers led to the naming of this subunit as glucoamylase, while Nt-MGAM has been
38
ascribed as the maltase subunit.1 Among the SI and MGAM subunits, Ct-MGAM recently has
39
been shown to be the most active, with ability to digest whole, undigested starch molecules,7 and
40
with the highest maltase activity compared to the other subunits.4,5 Although SI is the
3 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 4 of 31
41
predominant molecule in the apical membrane of human small intestinal epithelial cells, MGAM
42
compensates its relative low abundance with its higher hydrolytic activity.8
43
A possible strategy to control of the rate of free glucose release from the digestion of
44
starch is to inhibit the hydrolytic activity of salivary and pancreatic α-amylases, or preferably of
45
the intestinal α-glucosidases where glucose is actually generated. Through selective inhibition of
46
the faster digesting α-glucosidase Ct subunits, while leaving the slower digesting Nt subunits
47
active, one could expect to achieve a slower starch digestion effect. Such selective inhibition of
48
intestinal α-glucosidases may have multiple positive health implications related to control of the
49
glycemic response profile of starchy foods, and perhaps eliciting the ileal brake and gut-brain
50
axis response to reduce appetite and food intake.9 We recently showed that diverse synthetic
51
compounds can selectively inhibit the most active α-glucosidases, Ct-MGAM and Ct-SI, causing
52
slower digestion of the α-amylase degradation products of starch.10 The inhibition of α-
53
glucosidic activity of specific individual subunits of MGAM and SI can be considered as a key
54
approach for controlling glucose release, because the α-glucosidase catalytic activities are
55
responsible for producing virtually all the free glucose available for intestinal absorption.
56
A variety of chemical compounds have been shown to have inhibitory effect on
57
mammalian intestinal α-glucosidases. These compounds are derived either from chemical
58
synthesis,11,12 or from natural sources such as fruits13,14 or plants15-17. Naturally-occurring plant
59
phenolic compounds are one group of chemical metabolites reported to have inhibitory effect on
60
the α-glucosidases. For instance, caffeic and chlorogenic acids are typical hydroxycinnamic acids
61
found in high concentration in potatoes18 and coffee beans.19,20 Chlorogenic acids are esters of
62
caffeic acids and quinic acids.21 It was identified as the main α-glucosidase inhibitor found in the
63
leaf extract of Nerium indicum, causing reduced postprandial rise in blood glucose after ingestion 4 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 5 of 31
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
64
of 2 g maltose or sucrose/kg body weight in rats administered either the leaf extract or pure
65
chlorogenic acid (25 mg/kg body weight).22 A single serving of coffee can have 70-350 mg of
66
chlorogenic acid and a regular coffee drinker can take up to 1 g of chlorogenic acids per day.23
67
Caffeic acid was shown to be one of the most potent rat intestinal α-glucosidase inhibitors among
68
different cinnamic acid derivatives.24 The oxidized form of gallic acid caused nearly 40%
69
inhibition of rat brush border sucrase and maltase activities.25,26 (-)-Epigallocatechin gallate
70
(EGCG), the main catechin found in green tea,27 was also observed to be a potent inhibitor of
71
maltase activity in rat brush border membrane vesicles,28 rat intestinal acetone powder,29 and
72
recombinant human intestinal maltase.30 It has been also shown that tea catechins, especially
73
EGCG, may have potential for treating Type 2 diabetes.31,32 Subjects who consumed more than 6
74
cups of green tea daily were at less risk for Type 2 diabetes compared to subjects who drank less
75
than a cup per week.33
76
Overall, this information suggests that natural phenolic compounds present as normal
77
dietary components may exert selective and differential inhibition of the individual subunits of
78
MGAM and SI, for the potential modulation of digestion of starchy and other glycemic
79
carbohydrate rich foods. Although there are multiple publications describing inhibition of α-
80
glucosidases by phenolic compounds, the possibility of subunit selectivity for modulating
81
glucose release has not been studied. In the present study, we analyzed the inhibitory properties
82
and potential for the selective inhibition of the individual Ct and Nt subunits of MGAM and SI
83
using five phenolic and polyphenolic compounds [chlorogenic acid, caffeic acid, gallic acid, (+)-
84
catechin, EGCG] commonly found in Western diets, and whose α-glucosidase inhibition
85
properties have been previously described.
86
5 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 6 of 31
87 88
MATERIALS AND METHODS
89
Materials
90
All
reagents
including
phenolic
standards
of
chlorogenic
acid
(3-(3,4-
91
dihydroxycinnamoyl)quinic acid), caffeic acid, gallic acid, (+)-catechin, and (-)- epigallocatechin
92
gallate were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).
93
Enzyme preparation
94
Cloning, expression, and purification of recombinant mouse Ct-MGAM (Glucoamylase
95
subunit; spliceform N20), recombinant mouse Ct-SI (Sucrase subunit),4 recombinant human Nt-
96
MGAM (Maltase subunit),34 and human recombinant Nt-SI35 (Isomaltase subunit) were reported
97
previously. Mouse Ct-MGAM and Ct-SI were generated by recombinant expression in a
98
baculovirus-Sf9 insect cell system.4 Human Nt-MGAM and Nt-SI were expressed in Drosophila
99
S2 cells.34,35 Nickel-Sepharose resin was used to isolate the secreted proteins from the cell media
100
that were further purified using anion exchange chromatography.
101
Determination of protein concentration
102
Protein concentration of solutions was determined by the Bio-Rad Protein Assay kit
103
(Hercules, CA, USA ), using 10 µl of the protein solution and 200 µl of Bradford dye reagent,
104
and let sit for at least 5 min. Absorbance was read at 595 nm using a Synergy HT microplate
105
reader (BioTek; Winooski, VT, USA). Standards of bovine serum albumin were used in the
106
concentration range of 31.25 to 500 µg/ml.
107
Enzyme and inhibition assays 6 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 7 of 31
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
108
Glucose release was measured by the Tris Glucose Oxidase (TGO) method36 modified for
109
microplate wells. Maltose solution (10 µl) at final concentrations ranging from 2.1 to 16.7 mM,
110
(approximately 1 to 8 times the Km for maltose of Ct subunits and 0.3 to 3 times Km for maltose
111
of Nt subunits) was mixed with 10 µl of the enzyme solution containing 0.2 mU of activity for
112
Ct-MGAM, Ct-SI, and Nt-MGAM; and 0.1 mU of activity for Nt-SI. One unit (U) of enzyme
113
activity was defined as the activity that cleaves one µmol of maltose per min. The mixtures were
114
incubated for 1 h at 37 °C and then TGO (180 µl) was added and incubated for an additional 45
115
min.36 Absorbance was read at 450 nm in the microplate reader.
116
For inhibition assays, 10 µl of the phenolic inhibitor solutions were added to the above
117
reaction mixtures to attain final concentrations ranging from 0 to 666.7 µM for the gallic acid,
118
caffeic acid and (+)-catechin; while chlorogenic acid and EGCG were used at a final
119
concentration of 0-83.3 µM for C terminals of both MGAM and SI, or 0-666.7 µM for N
120
terminals of MGAM and SI. Analyses were conducted in triplicate. In order to correct for the
121
scavenger effect of phenolics on the oxidative intermediates generated during the glucose
122
oxidase-peroxidase reaction, which can lead to possible misleading readings of optical density
123
(OD),37 curves of glucose concentration vs OD in the presence of different concentrations of
124
each individual phenolic compound were constructed and used to adjust the OD obtained during
125
the assay of inhibition of the phenolics on the α-glucosidase enzymes. At the selected
126
concentrations, phenolics caused less than 20% inhibition of the glucose oxidase-peroxidase
127
developing reaction.
128
Determination of inhibition constant and inhibition mechanism
129
The inhibition mechanism and the respective inhibition constant (Ki) of each enzyme
130
subunit-phenolic combination were determined by the best fit of non-linear regression analysis 7 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 8 of 31
131
with the Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm, (Sigma Plot; Systat Software Inc.; San Jose, CA.,
132
USA) and the standard mathematic equations describing the inhibition mechanisms for
133
competitive, uncompetitive, non-competitive homogeneous, and non-competitive heterogeneous
134
inhibition.38 The mathematical fit with the best parameters of quality (highest r2, lowest p, lowest
135
residuals; p ≤ 0.05 for the statistical significance) for each enzyme-inhibitor combination was
136
chosen as the most probable inhibition mechanism in each case. For the calculations of kinetic
137
parameters we choose nonlinear regression methods instead of linear transformations and linear
138
regression, to avoid the additional error introduced by the latter procedures.39, 40
139
Determination of IC50 values
140
The concentration of each polyphenolic compound needed to cause 50% inhibition of the
141
activity of the individual enzyme subunits was defined as the IC50 value. It was calculated by
142
linear interpolation of the semi-log plot of (log [I]) versus the relative activity (v/Vmax = 0.5) at
143
16.67 mM maltose concentration (Minitab 14; State College, Pennsylvania, USA).
144
RESULTS
145
Kinetics and mechanism of inhibition of the recombinant Ct-MGAM, Nt-MGAM, Ct-SI
146
and Nt-SI
147
The inhibition capacity, the inhibition mechanism and corresponding inhibition constants
148
were determined for each phenolic compound against each recombinant α-glucosidase subunit.
149
Chlorogenic acid. Chlorogenic acid had higher inhibition binding affinities and correspondingly
150
lower inhibition constants for Ct-MGAM (3 µM) and Ct-SI (1.8 and 28 µM) compared to caffeic
151
acid, gallic acid, and (+)-catechin (Table 1). The binding affinity of chlorogenic acid was
8 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 9 of 31
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
152
approximately 56 and 15 times greater for Ct-SI and Ct-MGAM, than for Nt-SI and Nt-MGAM,
153
respectively. Chlorogenic acid showed non-competitive homogeneous inhibition for Ct-MGAM
154
and Nt-MGAM, while Ct-SI and Nt-SI were inhibited in a non-competitive heterogeneous way.
155
(-)-Epigallocatechin gallate. Ct-MGAM was also the most strongly inhibited subunit by EGCG,
156
with Ki1 and Ki2 values of 1.7 and 6.5 µM, respectively (Table 1). Figure 1 illustrates the change
157
in the relative activities (v/Vmax) of Ct-MGAM, Nt-MGAM, Ct-SI, and Nt-SI with the different
158
concentrations (0-666.7 µM) of EGCG in the presence of different maltose concentrations (2.1,
159
4.2, 8.3 and 16.7 mM). It is notable the difference in the sensitivity to inhibition by EGCG
160
observed between the Ct-subunits and Nt-subunits, the former showing a Ki two orders of
161
magnitudes smaller than the latter. Thus, EGCG was a comparatively potent inhibitor for Ct-
162
MGAM and Ct-SI (Figure 1a and b). EGCG inhibited Ct-MGAM, Nt-MGAM, and Nt-SI by a
163
non-competitive
164
homogeneous inhibition on Ct-SI.
165
(+)-Catechin. (+)-Catechin showed similar inhibition potency towards all four subunits (Figure
166
2). Affinities or inhibition constants of (+)-catechin for Ct-MGAM, Nt-MGAM and Ct-SI were
167
in the range of 20.4 to 97.2 µM (Table 1). The value of 33.7 µM (Table 1) for the Ki on Nt-SI
168
indicated a higher inhibitory effect on this subunit compared to the other phenols. (+)-Catechin
169
showed non-competitive heterogeneous inhibition on Ct-MGAM, Nt-MGAM, and Ct-SI, while it
170
showed non-competitive homogeneous inhibition on Nt-SI.
171
Caffeic acid. Caffeic acid had higher binding affinities (lower inhibition constant) for Ct-
172
MGAM and Ct-SI, than for the two N terminal enzyme subunits tested. The inhibition constants,
173
Ki1 and Ki2 for Ct-MGAM were 56.5 and 191.8 µM, while they were 58.2 and 323 µM for Ct-SI
heterogeneous
inhibition
mechanism,
and
caused
non-competitive
9 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 10 of 31
174
(Table 1). Caffeic acid showed non-competitive heterogeneous inhibition for Ct-MGAM, Nt-
175
MGAM and Ct-SI, while it inhibited Nt-SI in a non-competitive homogeneous manner.
176
Gallic acid. As with caffeic acid, Ct-MGAM and Ct-SI were the most sensitive to inhibition by
177
gallic acid, with values for Ct-MGAM of 24.9 and 50 µM for Ki1 and Ki2, and 31.3 and 142.8
178
µM for Ct-SI Ki1 and Ki2, respectively (Table 1). Gallic acid was inhibited by a non-competitive
179
heterogeneous mechanism for all four subunits.
180
Overall, inhibition by EGCG and chlorogenic acid showed marked preference toward the
181
C terminals of MGAM and SI than for N-terminals, but they displayed notable differences in
182
their selectivity to the two enzymes. Greatest inhibition of Ct-MGAM was caused by EGCG and
183
Ct-SI by chlorogenic acid. With the notable exception of (+)-catechin, which showed
184
comparably higher inhibition of Nt-SI, there was a general trend toward higher binding affinities
185
for Ct subunits over Nt.
186
IC50 values of inhibitors
187
IC50 values were also determined for the different phenolic compounds on the four
188
individual α-glucosidase subunits. These values result from the overall inhibition effects of the
189
different binding mechanisms that each compound may display and, therefore, are not
190
necessarily expected to be of same ranking as the inhibition constants. In this context IC50
191
represents the required concentration to inhibit 50% of the enzymatic activity and is conducted at
192
one single substrate concentration. The general trends observed before for the inhibition
193
constants held up. Among the compounds tested, chlorogenic acid and EGCG required the
194
lowest concentration range (2.3-13.8 µM) to inhibit 50% of the activity of Ct-MGAM and Ct-SI,
195
while a higher concentration range (39.6-159.4 µM) was required for Nt-MGAM and Nt-SI
10 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 11 of 31
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
196
(Figure 3). (+)-Catechin showed 50% inhibition of Ct-SI and Nt-SI at a comparably lower
197
concentration of 34.3 and 36 µM, respectively (Figure 3). Caffeic acid showed IC50 values in the
198
range of 137.4 to 266 µM (Figure 3) for all of the α-glucosidase subunits; however, it did inhibit
199
selectively Ct-MGAM and Nt-SI and with lower concentrations than the required for the other
200
two subunits (Figure 3). Gallic acid also showed stronger inhibition (lower IC50 values) on Ct-
201
MGAM and Nt- SI than on the other two subunits.
202
DISCUSSION
203
Phenolic acids and polyphenols have been reported to inhibit the activities of the
204
intestinal α-glucosidases, MGAM and SI.24-30 The use of phenolic compounds as modulators of
205
the rate of glucose release from starchy foods has been proposed for the treatment of metabolic
206
diseases such as diabetes.41 Although there are known strong inhibitors of α-glucosidases, such
207
as acarbose,41 they substantially reduce digestion of starch to glucose, resulting in dumping of
208
starch and starch products into the large intestine to cause bloating and discomfort. The purpose
209
of this study was to explore the selective inhibition by selected phenolic and polyphenolic
210
compounds on individual MGAM and SI subunits. We propose this effect could produce a slow,
211
but still complete digestion in the small intestine of the main glycemic carbohydrates, starch, and
212
sucrose. Additionally, slowly digested starch may trigger the ileal brake and gut-brain axis
213
mechanisms that respectively controls stomach emptying rate and influences hypothalamic
214
regulation of appetite, with potential impact on obesity and associated diseases.9,42,43
215
Our findings reveal that the four subunits of the intestinal α-glucosidases, SI and MGAM,
216
can be selectively and differentially inhibited by certain plant-derived phenolics. This introduces
217
the potential to induce different rates or profiles of digestion for starches, starch products, and
11 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 12 of 31
218
sucrose. For instance, selective inhibition of the most active starch degrading subunit, Ct-
219
MGAM (or Glucoamylase), was achieved with EGCG and chlorogenic acid. This implies that
220
reducing activity of this enzyme could slow the rate of starch digestion, and reduce particularly
221
the glycemic spike, as was proposed in a recent paper by our group.44 Chlorogenic acid had the
222
highest binding affinity (Ki1) for Ct-SI (Sucrase). This suggests the possibility of slowing the
223
rate of digestion of sucrose rich foods. Thirdly, (+)-catechin showed higher inhibition for Nt-SI,
224
the only subunit with endogenous α-1,6 branch hydrolyzing activity. The combination of (+)-
225
catechin with a highly branched starch or starch products, such as a highly branched
226
maltodextrin,45 could obtain a slow glucose release effect. The results imply that the low
227
inhibitory effect of phenolics on the slower acting Nt-MGAM and SI subunits, may allow for the
228
slow digestion of starch in diets containing such phenolics, but avoiding the inhibition of all four
229
subunits caused by stronger inhibitors like acarbose which, although effectively reducing
230
glycemic carbohydrate digestion, cause the delivery of large quantities of carbohydrates into the
231
colon.
232
The tested phenolics were shown to affect the ability of the substrate to bind the active
233
site of all enzyme subunits (Ki1); in some cases, phenolics may also bind already formed
234
enzyme-substrate complex, although this is with lesser affinity (Ki2). It has been reported that the
235
catalytic pockets of Ct-MGAM, Nt-MGAM and Nt-SI are surrounded by several aromatic amino
236
acids, which may comprise the substrate binding motifs of these enzymes.4 Therefore, it may be
237
speculated that phenolic compounds could interact and/or bind to these aromatic motifs in
238
proximity to the active site, impairing the binding of the substrate with a correct orientation. The
239
substantially higher values for Ki1 of phenolics than those found for other competitive
240
inhibitors,10 make unlikely the possibility for the existence of a typical competitive binding 12 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 13 of 31
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
241
component in the interaction and therefore discards the possibility of the existence of classic
242
mixed type inhibition. Thus, the model of typical non-competitive inhibition was the one that
243
most closely described the effects of phenolics. Therefore, phenolic and polyphenolic inhibitors
244
bind to at least a second additional site. Mathematical fittings of the experimental data indicated
245
that only five (Nt-SI/caffeic acid; Nt-SI/(+)-catechin; Ct-MGAM/chlorogenic acid; Nt-
246
MGAM/chlorogenic acid; and Ct-SI/EGCG) out of the twenty different inhibitor-subunit
247
combinations studied, showed the same values for Ki1 and Ki2. In these cases; therefore, the
248
binding affinity of phenolic compounds to the free enzyme and enzyme-substrate complex was
249
essentially the same, implicating that there was a single binding site for phenolics, and the
250
binding of substrate did not interfere with the binding of phenolics at their binding site. This also
251
implies the occurrence of conformational changes in the enzyme after binding of these phenolics,
252
with effect on their substrate binding capability or catalytic mechanism.38
253
Another study, using rat intestinal powder, showed that chlorogenic acid has a non-
254
competitive inhibition behavior on maltase and sucrose activities, which agreed with our
255
results.22 However, the IC50 values of chlorogenic acid for maltase and sucrase were 2.99 and
256
2.18 mM, which are substantially higher than our calculated IC50 values (Figure 3).22 This
257
difference could be explained by binding multiple protein components present in the crude
258
preparations of rat mucosal proteins. In another study, EGCG was shown as a competitive
259
inhibitor and its IC50 was estimated as 20 µM for human intestinal maltase.30 Also, results of an
260
earlier study showed that caffeic acid had very low inhibitory effect with IC50 values of 0.74 and
261
0.49 mM for maltase and sucrase, respectively.24 In our study, caffeic and gallic acid were not
262
nearly as strong inhibitors as chlorogenic acid and EGCG.
13 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 14 of 31
263
Stability of phenolic compounds must be considered, for such a selective inhibition
264
concept to be pursued in a practical sense. In one study, chlorogenic acid and caffeic acid were
265
found to be stable after incubating with human gastric juice, duodenal fluid and ileostomy
266
effluent.21 Another study showed that most (97.9-99.2%) of orally administered chlorogenic acid
267
(700 µmol/kg) and a small amount of caffeic acid (0.8-2.1%) were found in the rat small
268
intestine.46 Record and Lane47 tested the stability of gallic acid, caffeine, and EGCG in green tea
269
at acidic pH and at a slightly alkaline pH. Caffeine concentration did not change under the
270
exposure of either acidic (pH 2.0) or slightly alkaline pH (pH 7.5) conditions. Also, the
271
concentration of gallic acid was only slightly reduced at pH of 2.0 and at pH of 7.5. On the other
272
hand, although EGCG concentration slightly declined at pH of 2.0; its concentration was lower
273
with incubation for 1 h at pH of 7.5, decreasing from 1880 to 21 µmol/l in 1 g of green tea/50 ml
274
of water. Several studies also reported that while acidic pH similar to that of the stomach slightly
275
affected the concentration of catechins in green and black tea, the slightly alkaline pH (above pH
276
7.4) caused a significant decrease in their concentration.48-51 Those studies used alkaline pH
277
(above pH 7.4), however it may not reflect the actual pH of the lumen of the entire small
278
intestine since the pH measured in humans subjects was of 6.4-6.6 in the duodenum or proximal
279
small intestine and increased to 7.3-7.5 in the distal small intestine.52,53 This difference could be
280
important as the glycemic spike seen in the response profile arises from rapid proximal digestion
281
of glycemic carbohydrates, and at this lower pH the catechins could be found with good qualities
282
and high inhibition potential.
283
Of note, oxidative reactions in the gut lumen may lead to formation of complex dimers
284
including theasinesins.54 The ability of these larger phenolic forms to interact with enzymes at
285
the brush border is unknown.
14 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 15 of 31
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
286
In conclusion, the finding of selective inhibition by plant-derived phenolic compounds of
287
the individual mucosal α-glucosidases implies that digestion rate of starch, starch products, and
288
sucrose can be differentially affected and modulated by these dietary components. The potential
289
to control glycemic response profiles or sucrose hydrolysis rate using this selective inhibition
290
concept with phenolic compounds warrants further study with an in vivo model.
291
292
ABBREVIATIONS
293
MGAM: Maltase-Glucoamylase
294
SI: Sucrase-Isomaltase
295
Ct: C terminal end of proteins
296
Nt: N terminal end of proteins
297
EGCG: (-)-epigallocatechin gallate
298
Vmax: maximal rate of reaction
299
Ki: inhibition constant
300
IC50: the required concentration to inhibit 50 % of the enzymatic activity
301
CI: confidence interval
302
303
15 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 16 of 31
304
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
305
This work was funded by CONACYT, Mexico, projects 80448 and 173965. We thank the
306
Whistler Center for Carbohydrate Research at Purdue University for its partial support of the
307
project. The authors declared no conflict of interest for this work.
308
Supporting Information Available: Reaction mechanisms for each of the different inhibition
309
type and corresponding equations. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at
310
http://pubs.acs.org.
311 312 313
16 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 17 of 31
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
314
REFERENCES
315
(1) Quezada-Calvillo, R.; Sim, L.; Ao, Z.; Hamaker, B. R.; Quaroni, A.; Brayer, G. D.; Sterchi,
316
E. E.; Robayo-Torres, C. C.; Rose, D. R.; Nichols, B. L. Luminal starch substrate “brake” on
317
maltase-glucoamylase activity is located within the glucoamylase subunit. J. Nutr. 2008, 138,
318
685-692.
319
(2) Quezada-Calvillo, R.; Robayo-Torres, C. C.; Ao, Z.; Hamaker, B. R.; Quaroni, A.; Brayer, G.
320
D.; Sterchi, E. E.; Baker, S. S.; Nichols, B. L. Luminal substrate “brake” on mucosal maltase-
321
glucoamylase activity regulates total rate of starch digestion to glucose. J. Pediatr.
322
Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2007, 45, 32-43.
323
(3) Sim, L.; Quezada-Calvillo, R.; Sterchi, E. E.; Nichols, B. L.; Rose, D. R. Human intestinal
324
maltase-glucoamylase: crystal structure of the N-terminal catalytic subunit and basis of
325
inhibition and substrate specificity. J. Mol. Biol. 2008, 375, 782-792.
326
(4) Jones, K.; Sim, L.; Mohan, S.; Kumarasamy, J.; Liu, H.; Avery, S.; Naim, H. Y.; Quezada-
327
Calvillo, R.; Nichols, B. L.; Pinto, B. M.; Rose, D. R. Mapping the intestinal alpha-glucogenic
328
enzyme specificities of starch digesting maltase-glucoamylase and sucrase-isomaltase. Bioorg.
329
Med. Chem. 2011, 19, 3929-3934.
330
(5) Auricchio, S.; Semenza, G.; Rubino, A. Multiplicity of human intestinal disaccharidases. II.
331
Characterization of the individual maltases. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1965, 96, 498-507.
332
(6) Lin, A. H.-M.; Lee, B.-H.; Nichols, B. L.; Quezada-Calvillo, R.; Rose, D. R.; Naim, H. Y.;
333
Hamaker, B. R. Starch source influences dietary glucose generation at the mucosal α-glucosidase
334
level. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 36917-36921.
17 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 18 of 31
335
(7) Lin, A. H.-M.; Nichols, B. L.; Quezada-Calvillo, R.; Avery, S. E.; Sim, L.; Rose, D. R.;
336
Naim, H. Y.; Hamaker, B. R. Unexpected high digestion rate of cooked starch by the Ct-
337
Maltase-Glucoamylase small intestine mucosal α-glucosidase subunit. PLoS One 2012, 7,
338
e35473.
339
(8) Robayo-Torres, C. C.; Quezada-Calvillo, R.; Nichols, B. L. Disaccharide digestion: clinical
340
and molecular aspects. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2006, 4, 276-287.
341
(9) Lee, B.-H.; Bello-Perez, L. A.; Lin, A. H.-M.; Kim, C. Y.; Hamaker, B. R. Importance of
342
location of digestion and colonic fermentation of starch related to its quality. Cereal Chem. 2013,
343
90, 335-343.
344
(10) Lee, B.-H.; Eskandari, R.; Jones, K.; Reddy, K. R.; Quezada-Calvillo, R.; Nichols, B. L.;
345
Rose, D. R.; Hamaker, B. R.; Pinto, B. M. Modulation of starch digestion for slow glucose
346
release through “toggling” of activities of mucosal α-glucosidases. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287,
347
31929-31938.
348
(11) Eskandari, R.; Jones, K.; Reddy, K. R.; Jayakanthan, K.; Chaudet, M.; Rose, D. R.; Pinto, B.
349
M. Probing the intestinal α-glucosidase enzyme specificities of starch-digesting maltase-
350
glucoamylase and sucrase-isomaltase: Synthesis and inhibitory properties of 3′- and 5′-maltose-
351
extended de-O-sulfonated ponkoranol. Chem. - Eur. J. 2011, 17, 14817-14825.
352
(12) Eskandari, R.; Jones, K.; Rose, D. R.; Pinto, B. M. The effect of heteroatom substitution of
353
sulfur for selenium in glucosidase inhibitors on intestinal α-glucosidase activities. Chem.
354
Commun. 2011, 47, 9134-9136.
18 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 19 of 31
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
355
(13) McDougall, G. J.; Shpiro, F.; Dobson, P.; Smith, P.; Blake, A.; Stewart, D. Different
356
polyphenolic components of soft fruits inhibit α-amylase and α-glucosidase. J. Agric. Food
357
Chem. 2005, 53, 2760-2766.
358
(14) Kim, Y.-M.; Jeong, Y.-K.; Wang, M.-H.; Lee, W.-Y.; Rhee, H.-I. Inhibitory effect of pine
359
extract on α-glucosidase activity and postprandial hyperglycemia. Nutr. 2005, 21, 756-761.
360
(15) Oku, T.; Yamada, M.; Nakamura, M.; Sadamori, N.; Nakamura, S. Inhibitory effects of
361
extractives from leaves of Morus alba on human and rat small intestinal disaccharidase activity.
362
Br. J. Nutr. 2006, 95, 933-938.
363
(16) Ryu, H. W.; Lee, B. W.; Curtis-Long, M. J.; Jung, S.; Ryu, Y. B.; Lee, W. S.; Park, K. H.
364
Polyphenols from Broussonetia papyrifera displaying potent α-glucosidase inhibition. J. Agric.
365
Food Chem. 2010, 58, 202-208.
366
(17) Ramkumar, K. M.; Thayumanavan, B.; Palvannan, T.; Rajaguru, P. Inhibitory effect of
367
Gymnema Montanum leaves on α-glucosidase activity and α-amylase activity and their
368
relationship with polyphenolic content. Med. Chem. Res. 2010, 19, 948-961.
369
(18) Xu, X.; Li, W.; Lu, Z.; Beta, T.; Hydamaka, A.W. Phenolic content, composition,
370
antioxidant activity, and their changes during domestic cooking of potatoes. J. Agric. Food
371
Chem. 2009, 57, 10231-10238.
372
(19) Clifford, M. N.; Kazi, T. The influence of coffee bean maturity on the content of
373
chlorogenic acids, caffeine and trigonelline. Food Chem. 1987, 26, 59-69.
374
(20) Clifford, M. N.; Knight, S.; Surucu, B.; Kuhnert, N. Characterization by LC-MSn of four
375
new classes of chlorogenic acid in green coffee beans: Dimethoxycinnamoylquinic acids 19 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 20 of 31
376
diferuloylquinic acids, and feruloyldimethoxycinnamoylquinic acids. J. Agric. Food Chem.
377
2006, 54, 1957-1969.
378
(21) Olthof, M. R.; Hollman, P. C. H.; Katan, M. B. Chlorogenic acid and caffeic acid are
379
absorbed in humans. Hum. Nutr. Metab. 2001, 131, 66-71.
380
(22) Ishikawa, A.; Yamashita, H.; Hiemori, M.; Inagaki, E.; Kimoto, M.; Okamoto, M.; Tsuji,
381
H.; Memon, A. N.; Mohammadi, A.; Natori, Y. Characterization of inhibitors of postprandial
382
hyperglycemia from the leaves of Nerium indicum. J. Nutr. Sci. Vitaminol. 2007, 53, 166-173.
383
(23) Clifford, M. N. Chlorogenic acids and other cinnamates-nature, occurrence and dietary
384
burden. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1999, 79, 362-372.
385
(24) Adisakwattana, S.; Chantarasinlapin, P.; Thammarat, H.; Yibchok-Anun, S. A series of
386
cinnamic acid derivatives and their inhibitory activity on intestinal α-glucosidase. J. Enzyme
387
Inhib. Med. Chem. 2009, 24, 1194-1200.
388
(25) Welsch, C. A.; Lachance, P. A.; Wasserman, B. P. Effects of native and oxidized phenolic
389
compounds on sucrase activity in rat brush border membrane vesicles. J. Nutr .1989, 119, 1737-
390
1740.
391
(26) Gupta, N.; Gupta, S.; Mahmood, A. Gallic acid inhibits brush border disaccharidases in
392
mammalian intestine. Nutr. Res. 2007, 27, 230-235.
393
(27) Forester, S. C.; Gu, Y.; Lambert, J. D. Inhibition of starch digestion by the green tea
394
polyphenol, (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2012, 56, 1647-1654.
20 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 21 of 31
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
395
(28) Kamiyama, O.; Sanae, F.; Ikeda, K.; Higashi, Y.; Minami, Y.; Asano, N.; Adachi, I.; Kato,
396
A. In vitro inhibition of α-glucosidases and glycogen phosphorylase by catechin gallates in green
397
tea. Food Chem. 2010, 122, 1061-1066.
398
(29) Matsui, T.; Tanaka, T.; Tamura, S.; Toshima, A.; Tamaya, K.; Miyata, Y.; Tanaka, K.;
399
Matsumoto, K. α-Glucosidase inhibitory profile of catechins and theaflavins. J. Agric. Food
400
Chem. 2007, 55, 99-105.
401
(30) Nguyen, T. T. H.; Jung, S.-H.; Lee, S.; Ryu, H.-J.; Kang, H.-K.; Moon, Y.-H.; Kim, Y.-M.;
402
Kimura, A.; Kim, D. Inhibitory effects of epigallocatechin gallate and its glucoside on the human
403
intestinal maltase inhibition. Biotechnol. Bioprocess. Eng. 2012, 17, 966-971.
404
(31) Kao, Y. H.; Chang, H. H.; Lee, M. J.; Cheng, C. L. Tea, obesity, and diabetes. Mol. Nutr.
405
Food Res. 2006, 50, 188–210.
406
(32) Thielecke, F.; Boschmann, M. The potential role of green tea catechins in the prevention of
407
the metabolic syndrome-A review. Phytochem. 2009, 70, 11–24.
408
(33) Iso, H.; Date, C.; Wakai, K.; Fukui, M.; Tamakoshi, A.; the JACC Study Group. The
409
relationship between green tea and total caffeine intake and risk for self-reported type-2 diabetes
410
among Japanese adults. Ann. of Intern. Med. 2006, 144, 554–562.
411
(34) Rossi, E. J.; Sim, L.; Kuntz, D. A.; Hahn, D.; Johnston, B. D.; Ghavami, A.; Szczepina, M.
412
G.; Kumar, N. S.; Sterchi, E. E.; Nichols, B. L.; Pinto, B. M.; Rose, D. R. Inhibition of
413
recombinant human maltase glucoamylase by salacinol and derivatives. FEBS J. 2006, 273,
414
2673-2683.
21 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 22 of 31
415
(35) Sim, L.; Willemsma, C.; Mohan, S.; Naim, H. Y.; Pinto, B. M.; Rose, D. R. Structural basis
416
for substrate selectivity in human maltase-glucoamylase and sucrase-isomaltase N-terminal
417
domains. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 17763-17770.
418
(36) Quezada-Calvillo, R.; Markowitz, A. J.; Traber, P. G.; Underdown, B. J. Murine intestinal
419
disaccharidases: identification of structural variants of sucrase-isomaltase complex. Am. J.
420
Physiol. 1993, 265, G1141-9.
421
(37) Wong, A. I. C.; Huang, D. Assesment of the degree of interference of polyphenolic
422
compounds on glucose oxidation/peroxidase assay. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 4571-4576.
423
(38) Segel, I. H. Simple inhibition systems. In Enzyme kinetics: behavior and analysis of rapid
424
equilibrium and steady-state enzyme systems, 1; John Wiley & Sons Inc.: New York, New York,
425
1993, pp. 100-136.
426
(39) Leatherbarrow, R. J. Use of nonlinear regression to analyze enzyme kinetic data: application
427
to situations of substrate contamination and background subtraction. Anal. Biochem. 1990, 184,
428
274-278.
429
(40) Cornish-Bowden, A. Analysis and interpretation of enzyme kinetic data. Perspect. Sci.
430
2014, 1, 121-125.
431
(41) Hanhineva, K.; Törrönen, R.; Bondia-Pons, I.; Pekkinen, J.; Kolehmainen, M.; Mykkänen,
432
H.; Poutanen, K. Impact of dietary polyphenols on carbohydrate metabolism. Int. J. Mol. Sci.
433
2010, 11, 1365-1402.
434
(42) Maljaars, P. W. J.; Peters, H. P. F.; Mela, D. J.; Masclee, A. A. M. Ileal brake: A sensible
435
food target for appetite control. A review. Physiol. Behav. 2008, 95, 271-281. 22 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 23 of 31
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
436
(43) Strader, A. D.; Woods, S. C. Gastrointestinal hormones and food intake. Gastroenterol.
437
2005, 128, 175-191.
438
(44) Lee, B.-H.; Lin, A. H.-M.; Nichols, B. L.; Jones, K.; Rose, D. R.; Quezada-Calvillo, R.;
439
Hamaker, B. R. Mucosal C-terminal maltase-glucoamylase hydrolyzes large size starch digestion
440
products that may contribute to rapid postprandial glucose generation. Mol. Nutr. Food Res.
441
2014, 1, 1-11.
442
(45) Lee, B.-H.; Yan, L.; Phillips, R. J.; Reuhs, B. L.; Jones, K.; Rose, D. R.; Nichols, B. L.;
443
Quezada-Calvillo, R.; Yoo, S.-H.; Hamaker, B. R. Enzyme-synthesized highly branched
444
maltodextrins have slow glucose generation at the mucosal α-glucosidase level and are slowly
445
digestible in vivo. PloS One 2013, 8, e59745.
446
(46) Azuma, K.; Ippoushi, K.; Nakayama, M.; Ito, H.; Higashio, H.; Terao, J. Absorption of
447
chlorogenic acid and caffeic acid in rats after oral administration. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000, 48,
448
5496-5500.
449
(47) Record, I. R.; Lane, J. M. Simulated intestinal digestion of green and black teas. Food
450
Chem. 2001, 73, 481-486.
451
(48) Green, R. J.; Murphy, A. S.; Schulz, B.; Watkins, B. A.; Ferruzzi, M. G. Common tea
452
formulations modulate in vitro digestive recovery of green tea catechins. Mol. Nutr. Food Res.
453
2007, 51, 1152-1162.
454
(49) Tenore, G. C.; Campiglia, P.; Giannetti, D.; Novellino, E. Simulated gastrointestinal
455
digestion, intestinal permeation and plasma protein interaction of white, green, and black tea
456
polyphenols. Food Chem. 2015, 169, 320-326.
23 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 24 of 31
457
(50) Zhu, Q. Y.; Zhang, A. Q.; Tsang, D.; Huang, Y.; Chen, Z. Y. Stability of green tea
458
catechins. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1997, 45, 4624-4628.
459
(51) Yoshino, K.; Suzuki, M.; Sasaki, K.; Miyase, T.; Sano, M. Formation of antioxidants from
460
(–)-epigallocatechin gallate in mild alkaline fluids, such as authentic intestinal juice and
461
mouse plasma. J. Nutr. Biochem. 1999, 10, 223 -229.
462
(52) Fallingborg, J.; Christensen, L. A.; Ingeman-Nielsen, M.; Jacobsen, B. A.; Abildgaard, K.;
463
Rasmussen, H. H. pH-Profile and regional transit times of the normal gut measured by a
464
radiotelemetry device. Aliment. Pharmacol. Therap. 1989, 3, 605-613.
465
(53) Evans, D. F.; Pye, G.; Bramley, R.; Clark, A. G.; Dyson, T. J.; Hardcastle, J. D.
466
Measurement of gastrointestinal pH profiles in normal ambulat human subjects. Gut 1988, 29,
467
1035-1041.
468
(54) Neilson, A.; Bomser, J.; Periera, M.; Cooper, B.; Ferruzzi, M. G. Catechin degradation with
469
concurrent formation of homo- and hetero-catechin dimers during in vitro digestion. J. Agric.
470
Food Chem. 2007, 55, 8941-8949.
471
24 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 25 of 31
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
472
Figure captions
473
Figure 1. Relative activity (v/Vmax) of a) Ct-MGAM, b) Ct-SI, c) Nt-MGAM and d) Nt-SI at
474
different maltose concentrations (2.1, 4.2, 8.3 and 16.7 mM) in the presence of EGCG at 0 µM,
475
0.67 µM, 3.3 µM, 16.7 µM, and 83.3 µM for Ct-MGAM and Ct-SI (panels a and b); and 0 µM,
476
83.3 µM, 166.7 µM, 333.3 µM and 666.7 µM for Nt-MGAM and Nt-SI (panels c and d).
477
Figure 2. Relative activity (v/Vmax) of a) Ct-MGAM, b) Ct-SI, c) Nt-MGAM, and d) Nt-SI at
478
different maltose concentrations (2.1, 4.2, 8.3 and 16.7 mM) in the presence of (+)-catechin at 0
479
µM, 83.3 µM, 166.7 µM, 333.3 µM and 666.7 µM.
480
Figure 3. IC50 values (µM) of caffeic acid, gallic acid, (+)-catechin, chlorogenic acid, and EGCG
481
for the inhibition of Ct-MGAM, Nt-MGAM, Ct-SI and Nt-SI. Vertical lines represent the
482
calculated 95% CI for the experimental data.
483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490
25 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Table 1. Inhibition mechanism and inhibition constant (Ki) for each α-glucosidase subunit. Inhibition mechanism and inhibition constant (Ki; µM ± sd) Ct-MGAM Ct-SI Nt-MGAM Chlorogenic acid Type Non-competitive Non-competitive Non-competitive homogeneous heterogeneous homogenous Ki1 3 ± 0.3 1.8 ± 0.3 43.2 ± 3.5 Ki2 28 ± 8.8 r2 0.937 0.983 0.943 EGCG Type Non-competitive Non-competitive Non-competitive heterogeneous homogenous heterogeneous Ki1 1.7 ± 0.7 15.1 ± 1.6 9 ± 1.5 Ki2 6.5 ± 2.1 97.6 ± 49.3 2 r 0.941 0.939 0.967 (+)-Catechin Type Non-competitive Non-competitive Non-competitive heterogeneous heterogeneous heterogeneous Ki1 20.4 ± 8.2 21.6 ± 8.1 20.4 ± 3.8 Ki2 96.7 ± 21.7 45.4 ± 5.9 97.2 ± 26.9 r2 0.925 0.973 0.967 Caffeic acid Type Non-competitive Non-competitive Non-competitive heterogeneous heterogeneous heterogeneous Ki1 56.5 ± 25.4 58.2 ± 21.2 75.2 ± 13.3 Ki2 191.8 ± 39.6 323 ± 100.9 478.3 ± 167.1 2 r 0.918 0.902 0.968 Gallic acid Type Non-competitive Non-competitive Non-competitive heterogeneous heterogeneous heterogeneous Ki1 24.9 ± 8.6 31.3 ± 7.2 85.7 ± 13.9 Ki2 50 ± 5.7 142.8 ± 24.7 460.6 ± 133.2 2 r 0.978 0.969 0.971
Page 26 of 31
Nt-SI Non-competitive heterogeneous 101.8 ± 36.6 259.7 ± 114.5 0.93 Non-competitive heterogeneous 76.3 ± 31.5 140.4 ± 53.5 0.919 Non-competitive homogenous 33.7 ± 4.1 0.921 Non-competitive homogenous 103.3 ± 11.1 0.909 Non-competitive heterogeneous 44.6 ± 14.4 127.6 ± 28.7 0.93
26 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 27 of 31
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
27 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 28 of 31
Page 29 of 31
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 30 of 31
Page 31 of 31
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
ACS Paragon Plus Environment