Subscriber access provided by LAURENTIAN UNIV
Article
Direct Analysis of Lignin Phenols in Freshwater Dissolved Organic Matter Hendrik Reuter, Julia Gensel, Marcus Elvert, and Dominik Zak Anal. Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b03729 • Publication Date (Web): 15 Nov 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on November 17, 2017
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
Analytical Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 28
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Analytical Chemistry
Direct Analysis of Lignin Phenols in Freshwater Dissolved Organic Matter Hendrik Reuter,∗,†,⊥ Julia Gensel,†,‡,⊥ Marcus Elvert,¶ and Dominik Zak†,§,k †Department of Chemical Analytics and Biogeochemistry, Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, D-12587 Berlin, Germany ‡Department of Chemistry, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, D-12489 Berlin, Germany 1
¶MARUM Center for Marine Environmental Sciences & Department of Geosciences, University of Bremen, D-28359 Bremen, Germany §Department of Bioscience, University of Aarhus, DK-8600 Silkeborg, Denmark kInstitute of Landscape Ecology and Site Evaluation, University of Rostock, D-18059 Rostock, Germany ⊥Both authors contributed equally. E-mail:
[email protected] 1
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Analytical Chemistry
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
2
Abstract
3
A novel approach for the analysis of dissolved lignin in freshwaters is presented.
4
Lignin concentrations in natural waters are low and a lignin extraction is usually re-
5
quired to obtain sufficient sample for analysis. In this method, extraction and dry down
6
of the dissolved lignin are omitted and alkaline CuO oxidation is directly performed us-
7
ing 15 mL water sample in a microwave digestion system, thus reducing the required
8
amount of sample and its preparation time considerably. Low procedural blank values
9
are obtained by solid phase extraction (SPE) of the oxidized lignin phenols on HLB
10
sorbents. In combination with a here presented tandem GC-MS method, this leads to
11
selective and sensitive lignin phenol quantification. Method detection limits for lignin
12
phenols range from 23 to 1259 ng/L, offering applications for wetland, river and lake wa-
13
ters with high terrestrial dissolved organic matter inputs as well as leachates. Besides,
14
negative effects of dissolved nitrate on the lignin yield are investigated. The addition of
15
EDTA before sample acidification prevents those effects and is presented as a general
16
method improvement if lignin phenols are extracted using SPE. Three natural water
17
samples, a leaf leachate and two humic-rich lake waters, were analyzed by the here pre-
18
sented direct method and by the established C18 lignin extraction procedure. Results
19
show a similar reproducibility of both methods but higher absolute lignin phenol yields
20
for the here described direct dissolved lignin analysis.
2
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 2 of 28
Page 3 of 28
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Analytical Chemistry
21
Lignin is a structural component of vascular plants and, after cellulose, the second most
22
abundant biopolymer on earth. In senescent plant litter it accounts for approximately 20%
23
dry mass. Owing to its decay-resistant structure, intact or moderately altered lignin macro-
24
molecules constitute a part of the organic matter in soils, sediments and dissolved organic
25
matter (DOM). 1,2 One technique to analyze lignin in such samples is the alkaline CuO oxida-
26
tion which releases a set of lignin-derived phenolic monomers that are subsequently separated
27
and quantified mostly using gas chromatography mass spectrometry. 3,4
28
For DOM, the quantification of lignin phenols is a powerful approach to estimate the de-
29
gree of terrestrial organic matter inputs to an aquatic system. 5–9 Typical lignin yields in
30
freshwater DOM range from 0.24 to 3.12 mg/100 mg dissolved organic carbon (DOC). 10,11
31
The upper range of dissolved lignin is usually encountered in wetland waters where organic
32
matter inputs from the vegetation are high. 5,6,9 In contrast, dissolved lignin in the oceans
33
constitutes a smaller part of the total DOM with yields of 0.001-0.01 mg/100 mg DOC in the
34
North Pacific and North Atlantic ocean surface waters. 12,13
35
Compared to the analysis of lignin in soils or sediments, the analysis of dissolved lignin in wa-
36
ter samples requires higher effort during sample preparation. DOM concentrations in aquatic
37
systems are low (about 1-100 mg/L DOC) and a concentration routine is usually needed to
38
extract enough organic substrate for CuO oxidation. 14 Today, the most widely used DOM
39
concentration method is solid-phase extraction (SPE) on C18 functionalized silica sorbents
40
by which lignin phenols from 0.5 to 50 L water sample are quantitatively recovered. 15,16 Other
41
concentration methods include SPE on XAD resins, reverse osmosis or the direct dry down
42
by freeze-drying or rotary evaporation. 17,18
43
In this study, we present a novel approach for the analysis of dissolved lignin that directly
44
uses the aqueous water sample for CuO oxidation, omitting the initial DOM concentration
45
step. We combined several method improvements reported over the last years which lead
46
to low blank values and significantly improved detection limits. While still limited to wa-
47
ter samples with comparatively high dissolved lignin content, this approach considerably
3
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Analytical Chemistry
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
48
reduces the sample preparation time and the amount of water sample required. This makes
49
the method particularly suitable for laboratory decomposition experiments.
50
Applications as well as limitations of this approach are presented. Furthermore, we inves-
51
tigated the impact of DOC concentration on the lignin yield and report negative effects on
52
lignin yield, if the water sample contains dissolved nitrate. The addition of EDTA to the
53
reaction mixture is presented as an approach to counteract nitrate effects and as a general
54
improvement of the phenol extraction procedure.
55
Experimental section
56
Chemicals. All used reagents and solvents were of analytical grade, HPLC grade or LC-MS
57
grade and were, unless otherwise stated, obtained from Merck KGaA (Darmstadt, Germany),
58
Sigma Aldrich Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA) or VWR International GmbH (Darmstadt, Ger-
59
many). Pyridine was stored over KOH and freshly distilled every day. Every acidification
60
procedure mentioned was performed using 25% HCl. To avoid contamination, all glassware
61
R was heated to 450◦ C for 4 h before use. Water was obtained from an arium pro Ultrapure
62
Water System from Sartorius (Göttingen, Germany).
63
Leaf extracts and natural water samples. Leaf leachates were prepared from senescent
64
Phragmites australis leaves collected in autumn 2014 from the rewetted fen Stangenhagen,
65
south-west of Berlin, Germany. 19 We only collected brown P. australis leaves that were still
66
connected to the plant. Leaves were stored under dry and dark conditions until further
67
usage. 5.25 g dry leaves were leached for 24h in 3.5 L 3.5 mM NaCl solution at room temper-
68
ature. A second leachate was prepared using 15 g P. australis leaves from the kettle-hole mire
69
Kablow-Ziegelei, situated south of Berlin, under the same leaching procedure. That leachate
70
was sequentially diluted before CuO oxidation to study the effect of DOC concentration on
71
lignin yield.
72
Natural water samples were taken from the experimental brown-water lake Grosse Fuchs-
4
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 4 of 28
Page 5 of 28
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Analytical Chemistry
73
kuhle (north-eastern Germany) on October 25, 2017. Since 1989 the lake is artificially divided
74
into four basins with distinct catchment areas and thus contrasting DOM characteristics. 20
75
In the present study we sampled two basins with different hydrochemistry: The south-west
76
basin that receives high influxes of humic-rich organic matter from an adjacent Sphagnum
77
mire, and the north-east basin that receives no water from the mire. 21,22 Lake water samples
78
and leachates were passed through 0.2 µm PTFE membrane filters (Omnipore, Millipore)
79
and stored in the dark at 4◦ C until analysis within 48 hours. Subsamples were analyzed for
80
DOC concentration on a Shimadzu TOC analyzer.
81
Comparative DOM extraction. In order to evaluate the performance of the direct anal-
82
ysis of dissolved lignin to an established analytical routine, we analyzed three natural water
83
samples directly and after isolation of the dissolved lignin using C18 cartridges after Lou-
84
chouarn et al. 16 . Briefly, we extracted lignin from 500 mL water samples and used an aliquot
85
of the methanolic lignin extract which corresponded to the amount of dissolved lignin used
86
in the direct approach. This volume precludes sample size effects which have been reported
87
to affect intrinsic lignin parameters in former studies. 4
88
Prepacked C18 cartridges (Mega-Bond Elut-C18, 10 g, 60 mL, Agilent Technologies) were
89
pretreated with 100 mL methanol followed by 50 mL acidified water (pH 2). 500 mL water
90
sample, acidified to pH 2, was passed through the C18 cartridges under slightly elevated
91
head-pressure. Loaded C18 cartridges were rinsed with 500 mL acidified water to remove
92
salts and dried by passing a mild stream of argon through the sorbent for 10 min. Finally,
93
the DOM was eluted from the cartridge into a 100 mL volumetric flask in one fraction of
94
90 mL methanol and made up to volume. An aliquot (10 mL) of the methanolic DOM extract
95
was used for determination of the DOC recovery. A second aliquot (3 mL), corresponding to
96
DOM in 15 mL of the initial water sample, was directly transferred to the PTFE reaction
97
vessel and the methanol was removed at 45◦ C under a mild stream of nitrogen. 15 mL water
98
(sparged with argon for 60 min) was added to the reaction vessel in addition to the later
99
described reagents for the CuO oxidation.
5
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Analytical Chemistry
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
100
Lignin Oxidation. The lignin oxidation procedure was adapted after Goñi and Mont-
101
gomery 23 using a microwave digestion system (Microprep A, MLS GmbH, Germany) equipped
102
with 10 PTFE reaction vessels (100 mL volume). 500 mg CuO, 150 mg (NH4 )2 Fe(SO4 )2 ·6H2 O
103
and 10 mg glucose were added to each reaction vessel. The aqueous DOM sample was
104
sparged with argon for 60 min to remove dissolved oxygen and 15 mL sample was transferred
105
to each vessel. Finally, 50 µL internal standard solution (ethylvanilline and cinnamic acid,
106
c = 80 µg/mL in pyridine) and 1.76 mL NaOH (50%) were added and all reaction vessels
107
R , Sigma Aldrich) which was thoroughly were transferred into a 520 L glovebag (Atmosbag
108
flushed with argon for 5 min. After sealing and intense shaking, the vessels were placed into
109
the microwave system and heated to 150◦ C within 10 min with a temperature hold time of
110
90 min.
111
Lignin phenol extraction. After lignin oxidation the content of each PTFE vessel was
112
transferred to a 50 mL glass centrifuge tube (custom-made), centrifuged at 750 x g for 5 min
113
and the supernatant was decanted. The step was repeated after rinsing the PTFE vessel with
114
5 mL 2M NaOH. In order to remove remaining traces of CuO the combined supernatants
115
were centrifuged once more and transferred to a final 50 mL glass tube. 20 mg ethylenedi-
116
aminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) were added to the cooled reaction mixture (ice bath) before
117
slowly adding 5.50 mL HCl (25%), thereby avoiding any heating up of the solution. The pH
118
of each solution was tested before adding further HCl, if required (pH > 2).
119
R HLB extracLignin phenol extraction was adapted from Kaiser and Benner 4 using Oasis
120
tion cartridges (60 mg, 3 mL, Waters) placed on a 12-port extraction manifold (J.T. Baker).
121
The HLB cartridges were conditioned twice with 2 mL methanol and twice with 2 mL acidi-
122
fied water (pH 2). Acidified samples (pH 2) were passed through the HLB cartridges under
123
gravity flow and the glass centrifuge tubes were rinsed with 0.5 mL acidified water. Salts
124
were removed from the HLB cartridges with two rinses of 2 mL acidified water. Residual
125
water was removed from the HLB cartridges by centrifugation at 7000 x g for 5 min. At this
126
stage the HLB cartridges were frozen at -20◦ C until further use.
6
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 6 of 28
Page 7 of 28
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Analytical Chemistry
127
For elution, teflon needle liners (disposable flow control liners for VisiprepTM DL, Supelco)
128
were installed into the extraction manifold to avoid possible contamination. Prepacked anhy-
129
drous sodium sulfate drying cartridges (1 g, Agilent) were installed on the disposable liner,
130
followed by the HLB cartridge. Lignin phenols were eluted from the HLB cartridge with
131
three rinses of 1 mL dichloromethane/methyl acetate/pyridine (70/25/5, v/v/v%). Residual
132
solvent was removed from the drying cartridge by applying vacuum to the extraction mani-
133
fold. The sodium sulfate drying cartridge was removed and the HLB cartridge was installed
134
directly on the disposable flow liner. Phenol elution from the HLB cartridge was completed
135
with two rinses of 0.5 mL dry methanol. The solvents in the combined eluates were evap-
136
orated under a mild stream of nitrogen at room temperature. Samples were redissolved in
137
150 µL dry pyridine, transferred into a 1.5 mL sample vial and stored frozen at -20◦ C until
138
further use.
139
Lignin phenol quantification. Lignin phenol quantification was carried out using a
140
7000C Triple Quadrupole GC/MS system from Agilent (Palo Alto, CA, USA) equipped
141
with a 7890B GC oven, a multimode inlet, and an automated liquid sampler (ALS). Prior
142
to analysis, lignin phenols were derivatized by transferring 5 µL sample into a 2 mL crimp
143
top vial equipped with a 250 µL vial insert. 50 µL N,O-bis(trimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide
144
(BSTFA) with 1% trimethylchlorosilane (TMCS) was added and the reagents were mixed
145
by pipetting up and down about 5 times. The vials were closed with crimp caps, stored at
146
75◦ C for 20 min to complete the derivatization reaction and transferred to the ALS. 1 µL
147
sample was injected under splitless mode with an inlet temperature of 300◦ C. The septum
148
purge flow was 3 mL/min. The purge flow to split vent was set to 100 mL/min after 3 min.
149
870 µL ultra inert inlet liners with glass wool were used.
150
Separation was achieved on a DB-5ms Ultra Inert capillary column (60 m length, 0.25mm
151
inner diameter, 0.25 µm film thickness) at constant flow mode (1.5 mL/min, helium). The
152
start temperature of the GC oven was 50◦ C, held for 3 min, followed by a temperature ramp
153
of 10◦ C/min, a final temperature of 300◦ C and a hold time of 5 min. The transfer line tem-
7
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Analytical Chemistry
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 8 of 28
154
perature was held at 250◦ C. On the MS side, we used the 7000C electron ionization (EI)
155
ion source heated at 230◦ C and operated at 70 eV, quadrupoles held at 150◦ C, a nitrogen
156
collision flow of 1.5 mL/min, and a helium quench flow of 2.25 mL/min.
157
Measurements were carried out in Multiple Reaction Monitoring (MRM) mode following
158
Louchouarn et al. 15 with modifications. The chromatographic run duration was subdi-
159
vided into 12 time segments corresponding to the retention times of the different lignin phe-
160
nols: 16.5-18.0 min (p-hydroxybenzaldehyde, PAL), 18.0-19.1 min (p-hydroxyacetophenone,
161
PON), 19.1-19.9 min (vanillin, VAL & cinammic acid, CiAD), 19.9-20.25 min (ethyl vanillin,
162
EVAL), 20.25-20.95 min (p-hydroxybenzaldehyde, PAD & acetovanillon, VON), 20.95-21.75 min
163
(syringaldehyde, SAL), 21.75-22.2 min (vanillic acid, VAD & acetosyringone, SON), 22.2-
164
22.9 min (3,5-dihydroxy-benzoic acid, DiOHBA), 22.9-23.55 min (syringic acid, SAD), 23.55-
165
24.5 min (p-coumaric acid, CAD), 24.5 min-end (ferulic acid, FAD). One quantification and
166
two qualification transitions were monitored for each target compound (Table 1). The dwell
167
times were set to 50 µs per transition for time segments with three monitored transitions
168
and 40 µs for segments with six transitions.
169
Lignin phenols were quantified using the Agilent MassHunter Workstation Software (Quan-
170
titative Analysis, Version B.07.01 for QQQ). Calibration points were determined for each
171
lignin phenol by spiking blanks with increasing amounts of a calibration mixture and 50 µL
172
of the internal standard mixture before CuO oxidation. Concentrations were determined as
173
relative response factors to the internal standards EVAL (for VAL, VON and SAL) or CiAD
174
(remaining phenols). Using a 1:2 dilution pattern, 7 calibration points ranging in concentra-
175
tion from 70 to 25.000 pg/µL per phenol were determined to generate quadratic calibration
176
curves based on 5 selected data points and dependend on the target analyte concentration
177
in the specific data set.
8
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 9 of 28
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Analytical Chemistry
178
Results and discussion
179
Method Development Strategy. In previously reported methods, the analysis of dis-
180
solved lignin in natural water samples requires a concentration of the DOM. 16 The obtained
181
dry DOM extract is redissolved in 2M NaOH which serves as solvent in the subsequent lignin
182
oxidation reaction. The critical method modification presented here omits the DOM concen-
183
tration. 1.76 mL 50% NaOH is directly added to 15 mL natural water sample to obtain the
184
lignin-containing 2M NaOH for the oxidation reaction. Advantages of this approach include
185
the use of less water sample and the avoidance of an additional sample preparation step like
186
C18 SPE or direct dry down of the water sample.
187
Our approach leads to considerably smaller analyte concentrations compared to previously
188
described methods. This was addressed with the use of a microwave digestion system which
189
allows higher sample volumes than the often used reaction minibombs. Lignin phenols were
190
extracted using polymer-based extraction cartridges 4 to obtain lower procedural blank values
191
compared to the liquid-liquid extraction technique utilizing ethyl acetate. Phenol quantifi-
192
cation was performed by tandem mass spectrometry in MRM mode which leads to higher
193
selectivity and sensitivity compared to single quadrupole instruments.
194
Chromatography, MRM transitions and detection limits. A tandem GC-MS chro-
195
matogram of the lake Grosse Fuchskuhle water sample is presented in Figure 1. No chromato-
196
graphic separation was achieved for VON and PAD, which was not required for quantification
197
due to the high selectivity of the MRM transitions (Figure 1, inserted picture). An overview
198
of the MRM method settings of the silylated lignin phenols is presented in Table 1. Tandem
199
mass spectrometry is based upon the selective filtering of a specific precursor ion in the first
200
quadrupole followed by the collision-activated dissociation of the precursor in the second
201
quadrupole and the quantification of a specific product ion in the third quadrupole. Such
202
effective ion filtering results in very low signal-to-noise values and a sensitive and selective
203
quantification of the target analytes. Three transitions were measured for each analyte and
204
consistent peak ratios of the quantifier and qualifier signals were constantly monitored by the 9
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Analytical Chemistry
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 10 of 28
Table 1: Retention times, collision energies and m/z-values with proposed fragmentation patterns of the silylated lignin phenols.
CiAD
RTb (min) 19.45
EVAL
20.07
PAL
17.30
PON
18.55
PAD
20.37
VAL
19.35
VON
20.35
VAD
21.89
SAL
21.27
SON
22.01
SAD
23.27
DiOHBA
22.39
CAD
23.78
FAD
25.22
Compound
Precursor Ionc (m/z ) 205 [M-CH3 ]+ 205 [M-CH3 ]+ 161 [M-CH3 -CO2 ]+ 195 [M-CH3 -C2 H4 ]+ 195 [M-CH3 -C2 H4 ]+ 167 [M-CH3 -C2 H4 -CO]+ 179 [M-CH3 ]+ 151 [M-CH3 -CO]+ 151 [M-CH3 -CO]+ 208 [M]+· 208 [M]+· 193 [M-CH3 ]+ 282 [M]+· 267 [M-CH3 ]+ 267 [M-CH3 ]+ 209 [M-CH3 ]+ 209 [M-CH3 ]+ 194 [M-C2 H6 ]+· 223 [M-CH3 ]+ 223 [M-CH3 ]+ 193 [M-CH3 -C2 H6 ]+ 312 [M]+· 297 [M-CH3 ]+ 297 [M-CH3 ]+ 254 [M]+· 254 [M]+· 224 [M-C2 H6 ]+· 268 [M]+· 253 [M-CH3 ]+ 238 [M-C2 H6 ]+· 342 [M]+· 327 [M-CH3 ]+ 327 [M-CH3 ]+ 370 [M]+· 355 [M-CH3 ]+ 355 [M-CH3 ]+ 293 [M-CH3 ]+ 293 [M-CH3 ]+ 219 [M-C3 H9 SiO]+ 323 [M-CH3 ]+ 323 [M-CH3 ]+ 308 [M-C2 H6 ]+·
Product Ionc (m/z ) 161 [M-CH3 -CO2 ]+ 131 [M-CH3 -C2 H6 SiO]+ 145 [M-CH3 -CO2 -CH4 ]+ 179 [M-CH3 -C2 H4 -CH4 ]+ 167 [M-CH3 -C2 H4 -CO]+ 151 [M-CH3 -C2 H4 -CO-CH4 ]+ 151 [M-CH3 -CO]+ 95 [M-CH3 -CO-C2 H4 Si]+ 75 [M-CH3 -CO-C6 H4 ]+ 193 [M-CH3 ]+ 73 [M-C8 H7 O2 ]+ 73 [M-C8 H7 O2 ]+ 267 [M-CH3 ]+ 223 [M-CH3 -CO2 ]+ 193 [M-CH3 -C2 H6 SiO]+ 193 [M-CH3 -CH4 ]+ 165 [M-CH3 -C3 H8 ]+ 137 [M-C2 H6 -C2 H5 Si]+· 208 [M-CH3 -CH3 ]+· 193 [M-CH3 -C2 H6 ]+ 137 [M-CH3 -C2 H6 -CH3 -CHO]+ 297 [M-CH3 ]+ 282 [M-CH3 -CH3 ]+· 267 [M-CH3 -C2 H6 ]+ 239 [M-CH3 ]+ 224 [M-C2 H6 ]+· 195 [M-C2 H6 -CHO]+ 238 [M-C2 H6 ]+· 238 [M-CH3 -CH3 ]+· 195 [M-C2 H6 -C2 H3 O]+ 327 [M-CH3 ]+ 253 [M-CH3 -C2 H6 SiO]+ 223 [M-CH3 -C3 H9 SiO-CH3 ]+ 281 [M-C3 H9 SiO]+ 311 [M-CH3 -CO2 ]+ 281 [M-CH3 -C2 H6 SiO]+ 249 [M-CH3 –CO2 ]+ 219 [M-CH3 -C2 H6 SiO]+ 191 [M-C3 H9 SiO-CO]+ 293 [M-CH3 -C2 H6 ]+ 249 [M-CH3 -C2 H6 SiO]+ 293 [M-C2 H6 -CH3 ]+
b
CE (eV ) 5 17 5 8 8 11 8 8 17 8 29 20 8 11 20 20 29 29 5 17 23 8 5 14 5 17 20 14 5 40 8 23 32 23 11 17 8 17 11 14 17 5
Retention time on DB-5ms Ultra Inert column (60 m, 0.25 mm ID, 0.25 µm film thickness; Agilent Technologies). c Underlined ions highlight the quantification transitions.
10
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 11 of 28
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Analytical Chemistry
Figure 1: Tandem mass chromatogram of the lake Grosse Fuchskuhle (south-east) water sample in MRM mode (black) and in full scan mode (grey, multiplied with 0.2). The inserted picture highlights the coelution of VON and PAD and the three MRM transitions recorded for each analyte. 205
quantification software. Only PAL and PAD required manual inspection of a correct peak
206
integration in a few natural samples with low lignin concentrations. These analytes pro-
207
vided a comparably poor fragmentation pattern due to the low number of functional groups
208
present, thus more unspecific product ions had to be chosen (m/z = 75, (CH3 )2 SiOH+ and
209
m/z = 73, (CH3 )3 Si+ ).
210
Instrument detection limits (IDL) and method detection limits (MDL) were determined
211
following guidelines of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 24 The IDL was
212
calculated from 7 replicate injections of the lowest calibration standard (4.2-7.4 pg/µL) as
213
IDL = tα ·σ where tα refers to the critical value of the t distribution (α = 0.01) and σ is the
214
standard deviation. The MDL was calculated analogously using 7 spiked samples (10-50 ng
215
phenol) that ran through the complete sample preparation procedure. IDLs are presented
216
in pg analyte per µL pyridine/BSTFA solution (Table 2), ranging from 0.15 to 0.60 pg/µL.
217
MDL values are presented as lignin phenol concentrations in a water sample after CuO ox-
218
idation and range from 23 to 1259 ng/L. The lowest values between 23 and 94 ng/L were
219
determined for the phenols bearing a ketone group (PON, VON and SON). These analytes
220
showed a high and reproducible extraction recovery and low blank values. MDL values allow 11
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Analytical Chemistry
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Table 2: Instrumental detection limit (IDL) and method detection limit (MDL) of single lignin phenols using MRM by tandem mass spectrometry. Compound PAL PON PAD VAL VON VAD SAL SON SAD DiOHBA CAD FAD a b
221
222
223
224
IDLa (pg/µL) 0.37 0.24 0.28 0.40 0.15 0.39 0.29 0.28 0.55 0.24 0.43 0.60
MDLb (ng/L) 230 64.2 225 57.7 22.7 91.3 166 93.5 294 1100 1260 836
IDL refers to unsilylated analyte concentration in the injected pyridin/BSTFA mixture. MDL refers to concentration of lignin oxidation products in a water sample.
a rough estimation of the minimal DOC content in order to analyze a water sample directly for dissolved lignin. The total dissolved lignin content of a water sample is defined as the P P sum of vanillyl, syringyl and cinnamyl phenols ( 8 =V+S+C). This leads to a 8 -MDL of P 2.8 µg/L and a method quantification limit 8 -MQL of 8.5 µg/L. In a natural aquatic system
225
with terrestrial DOM sources, total dissolved lignin accounts for about 0.5 mg/100mg DOC
226
what would lead to a minimal DOC concentration of 1.7 mg/L in order to quantify lignin.
227
This estimation, however, underestimates the DOC concentration as it is solely based on
228
the MDL and neglects the natural distribution of lignin phenols released during oxidation
229
of a natural water sample. Consequently, the direct approach of dissolved lignin analysis
230
can be applied to lignin rich waters from wetlands, 18 to riverine water with high terrestrial
231
DOM concentrations, such as the Congo river, 9 as well as to soil porewater or to laboratory
232
experiments studying dissolved lignin decomposition on appropriate sample types. However,
233
waters from many rivers, such as the arctic rivers, 7 as well as estuarine and marine wa-
234
ters 12,13 generally do not contain sufficient dissolved lignin for direct analysis.
235
Lignin phenol extraction. The liberated lignin phenols are extracted from the aqueous
236
phase after CuO oxidation. Alternatively to the liquid-liquid extraction with ethyl acetate we
237
R HLB catridges after Kaiser and Benner 4 . Deviating followed the SPE approach with Oasis
12
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 12 of 28
Page 13 of 28
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Analytical Chemistry
Figure 2: SPE recoveries of a lignin phenol standard mixture (0.5-1.5 µg of each phenol) extracted from 2, 10,P25 and 50 mL water. Error bars P represent standard deviations of duplicate analyses. Aldehydes = PAL + VAL + SAL, Ketones = PON + VON + SON, P Acids = PAD + VAD + SAD + CAD + FAD. 238
from the original method, the microwave digestion systems used here processes higher sample
239
volumes than the classical reaction minibombs. We therefore investigated the phenol reten-
240
tion capacity of the HLB resin by spiking equal amounts of a standard containing between
241
0.5 and 1.5 µg of each phenol into different water volumes (i.e. 2, 10, 25 and 50 mL) treated
242
with base, followed by acidification and finally extracted according to the lignin protocol.
243
Syringic phenols and those bearing an acidic functional group revealed a lower retention on
244
the resin which led to considerable analyte breakthrough at higher sample volumes (Figure 2
245
and Table 5 in the Supporting Information). In particular SAD, FAD and DiOHBA showed
246
recoveries below 50% when extracted from 50 mL water volume, whereas VAD and PAD
247
were quantitatively recovered.
248
In accordance with the original lignin oxidation protocol in a microwave digestion system 23
249
we routinely used a volume of 15 mL for CuO oxidation of water samples. Recovery rates
250
for calibration standards that ran through the complete analysis ranged from 76.7 to 111.6%
251
except DiOHBA with a low recovery of 48.5% (Table 4 in the Supporting Information).
252
Loading time of the lignin phenols on the HLB sorbent was between 2-4 h. Even though
253
no residual CuO was visually detected in the samples after centrifugation, we noticed the 13
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Analytical Chemistry
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
254
accumulation of CuO residuals on the SPE sorbent during loading thus reducing sample flow
255
through the sorbent. Addition of EDTA to the sample before the acidification step counter-
256
acted this effect as no accumulation of CuO on the sorbent occurred. Intentionally added
257
to prevent phenol losses in water samples that contain nitrate (see below), we therefore sug-
258
gest the general use of EDTA before acidification. No negative effects of EDTA on phenol
259
extraction were observed, but the HLB cartridge loading time is reduced and catalytically
260
active copper(II) is removed at an early stage.
261
Nitrate interference. The C18 extraction of DOM from water samples not only concen-
262
trates lignin phenols, but also removes dissolved inorganic salts from the sample matrix. As
263
we omitted this step, inorganic salts remain present in the reaction mixture during CuO
264
oxidation. Thus, potential matrix effects of the latter need to be addressed which we con-
265
fidently believe have no effect on the lignin phenol analysis of aqueous DOM samples for
266
two reasons. Firstly, the method is commonly applied to dried sediments, soils or freeze-
267
dried DOM, thus to samples that similarly bear a strong inorganic matrix; 4,17 and secondly,
268
(NH4 )2 Fe(SO4 )2 ·6H2 O is routinely added to the reaction mixture prior to the CuO oxidation
269
step in order to remove residual oxygen, a step that generally increases the inorganic matrix
270
considerably.
271
As one exception to the otherwise low matrix effects, however, we noticed discrepancies in
272
the lignin yield of water samples that contained high amounts of dissolved nitrate. To specif-
273
ically investigate this effect, we spiked a P. australis leaf leachate with increasing amounts of
274
sodium nitrate before CuO oxidation. Results of this experiment indicate a significant drop
275
in lignin yield at nitrate concentrations of 15 mg/L nitrate-N or higher (t-test, p0.05) (Figure 4a). The
314
sample with 5 mg/L DOC, however, indicated a significant decrease in syringyl and cinnamyl
315
phenol yield (t-test, p