Direct Catalytic Reductive N-Alkylation of Amines with Carboxylic

Jul 9, 2019 - ... website at DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.9b01974. Text, tables, and figures giving experimental procedures and characterization data (PDF) ...
0 downloads 0 Views 398KB Size
Subscriber access provided by UNIV OF SOUTHERN INDIANA

Article

Direct Catalytic Reductive N-Alkylation of Amines with Carboxylic Acids: Chemoselective Enamine Formation and further Functional-izations Paz Trillo, and Hans Adolfsson ACS Catal., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.9b01974 • Publication Date (Web): 09 Jul 2019 Downloaded from pubs.acs.org on July 17, 2019

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Catalysis

Direct Catalytic Reductive N-Alkylation of Amines with Carboxylic Acids: Chemoselective Enamine Formation and further Functionalizations Paz Trillo and Hans Adolfsson*

Department of Chemistry, Umeå University, KBC3, Linnaeus väg 10, SE-90187 Umeå, Sweden

KEYWORDS: chemoselective N-alkylation, carboxylic acids, enamine, hydrosilylation, functionalization

ABSTRACT. Direct reductive N-alkylation of secondary amines with carboxylic acids using molybdenum hexacarbonyl (5 mol%) as catalyst and diethoxymethylsilane as reducing agent generate enamines in a straightforward fashion in high yields. The formed enamines are without the need for isolation or purification further reacted with trimethylsilyl cyanide in the same reaction flask to yield α-amino nitriles in good yields.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

1

ACS Catalysis 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 2 of 31

In the optimized reaction conditions equimolar amounts of carboxylic acid and amine are reacted under neat conditions, and a catalytic amount of trifluoroethanol (0.1 mol%) is added along with TMSCN for the cyanation step. The reductive N-alkylation reaction is demonstrated to be highly chemoselective, tolerating a multitude of different functional groups present in the starting carboxylic acids and amines. The reaction is scalable and the generated α-amino nitriles are converted to other useful compounds, e.g. α-amino acids or amino-tetrazoles. In addition, the intermediate enamines are further transformed into triazolines, sulfonylformamidines, pyrimidinediones and TMSpropargylamines, respectively, in high yields under mild reaction conditions. Benzoic acids react with secondary amines under similar conditions to give tertiary amines in high yields, and using this methodology, the biologically active compound Piribedil was isolated in 80% yield in a direct one-pot reaction set-up.

INTRODUCTION Substituted amines are important functional groups present in numerous biologically active organic compounds such as amino acids, nucleotides and alkaloids. Substituted

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

2

Page 3 of 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Catalysis

amines play an important role in chemistry and biology, frequently being used as versatile building blocks for organic and biological systems, agrochemicals and pharmaceuticals.1 Therefore, methods that enable efficient synthesis of substituted amines have been pursued intensively. Among the different methodologies available, catalytic reduction protocols of imines and amides constitute fundamental routes for their preparation.2 However, an inherent drawback of such synthetic protocols is the need of proper starting materials, where the latter frequently needs to be prepared and isolated prior to the reduction step (Scheme 1, a).3 Direct reductive amination of carbonyl compounds represent a well-established and practical approach for the formation of substituted amines. In this sense, mainly aldehydes or ketones are reacted with amines in the presence of a reducing agent to afford the desired products.4

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

3

ACS Catalysis 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Step 1: Amide formation (X = OH, Cl or activating agents)

(a) O R1

+ X

R2

H N

(b) X = OH

R3

O R1

N R2

R

3

Page 4 of 31

Step 2: Reduction

reductant: silane, borane or H2

R1

N R2

R3

Direct catalytic reductive N-alkylation

Scheme 1. Methods for reductive N-alkylation of amines: (a) Two-step amide formation and subsequent reduction using silane, borane or H2 as reductant. (b) Direct catalytic reductive protocol using carboxylic agents as alkylating reagents with silane, borane or H2 as reductant.

In contrast, the use of such a strategy starting from carboxylic acids is significantly less studied due to the lower reactivity of the acids and the intermediate amides. Nevertheless, direct reductive alkylation of amines with carboxylic acids offer several advantages. Carboxylic acids are frequently rather stable, non-toxic, and readily available with large structural variation, which make such compounds most suitable as N-alkylating agents for the formation of substituted amines (Scheme 1, b).5

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

4

Page 5 of 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Catalysis

A limited number of methodologies have been presented for the catalytic N-alkylation of amines with carboxylic acids in the presence of silanes (Scheme 2). The first protocol reported was by Beller’s group in 2014, where a [Platinum/dppe] complex was used to obtain a broad scope of N-alkylamines in high yields (Scheme 2, a).6 A year later, Fu, Shang and co-workers reported on a catalytic boron-acid system employing polymethylhydrosiloxane (PMHS) as hydride source, and they obtained more than twenty N-alkylamines in excellent yields (Scheme 2, b).7 After these pioneering works, different methodologies have been published by the groups of Kobayashi, Denton and Minakawa for the same transformation using rhodium-,8 iridium-,9 and rutheniumbased10 catalysts, respectively (Scheme 2, c, d and e). (e) Minakawa et al. 2016 [Ru] cat. 2.5 mol% P(C6F5)3 7.5 mol% MePhSiH2 7.2 equiv 100 oC, 1,4-dioxane, 3 - 12h O R1

+ OH

R2

H N

R3

2

R = H or = H

(d) Denton et al. 2016 [Ir] cat. 1 - 3 mol% PhSiH3 3 - 3.75 equiv reflux toluene, 4 - 18 h (c) Kobayashi et al. 2015 [Rh] cat. 0.25 - 1.5 mol% PhSiH3 4 - 6 equiv 30 - 50 oC, THF, 20 h

R1 R2

N

R3

[B] cat. 0.5 - 1 mol% [Pt] cat. 0.5 - 1 mol% PMHS 2.5 - 7 equiv dppe 0.5 - 1 mol% 100 oC, toluene, 13 - 20 h PhSiH3 3.3 - 10 equiv rt to 100 oC, n-Bu2O, 18 h (b) Fu and Shang et al. 2015 (a) Beller et al. 2014

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

5

ACS Catalysis 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 6 of 31

Scheme 2. Catalytic N-alkylation of amines with carboxylic acids under hydrosilylation conditions.

In spite of the recent breakthroughs and the progress made in this field over the last years, there are, to the best of our knowledge, no reports on the selective N-alkylation of amines with carboxylic acids leading to enamines. Carboxylic acids possessing hydrogens are particular interesting since partial reduction of the intermediate amide can lead to the corresponding enamines. Enamines are reactive intermediates present in a number of organic transformations and can thus serve as suitable synthetic handles for a number of further elaborations. Herein we describe an un-precedented, mild and chemoselective catalytic protocol for the reductive N-alkylation of amines using carboxylic acids under hydrosilylation conditions, which allows for the formation of enamines and the subsequent functionalization of these into α-amino nitriles (Scheme 3).

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

6

Page 7 of 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Catalysis

O R1

+ OH

R

2

H N

R1

Mo(CO)6 R

3

R1 TMSCN

Me(EtO)2SiH Neat

R2

N

R3

NC R2

N

R3

Scheme 3. This work: Mo(CO)6 catalyzed selective N-alkylation of amines with carboxylic acids under hydrosilylation conditions.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

We have previously developed a highly chemoselective protocol for the reduction of amides

based

on

catalytic

amounts

of

Mo(CO)6

and

TMDS

(1,1,3,3-

tetramethyldisiloxane) as terminal reductant.11 Depending on the reaction conditions used, we were able to selectively convert amides to either amines or aldehydes, via an intermediate silylhemiaminal.

Performing the reduction on carboxamides bearing α-

hydrogens opened a direct route for the formation of enamines, which were subsequently further functionalized.12,13 This methodology was successfully applied in the chemoselective reductive functionalization of amides into bi-functional compounds such as α-amino nitriles, an essential class of compounds with interesting

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

7

ACS Catalysis 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 8 of 31

pharmacological and biological properties.13,14 The ready availability of carboxylic acids and amines prompted us to examine a similar process, where the direct amidation followed by reductive functionalization would yield highly functionalized compounds from simple starting materials using a one-pot setup. We started by investigating different reaction parameters such as testing various silanes, temperatures and solvents for the reaction between phenylacetic acid (1a) and pyrrolidine (2a). The reductive vinylation of 2a in the presence of 5 mol% of Mo(CO)6 and Me(EtO)2SiH as hydride source, gave the corresponding enamine 3a’ in 89% 1H NMR yield. To our delight, performing the reaction under neat conditions and with stoichiometric amounts of the reagents allowed for full conversion to the enamine in less than 3 hours, hence demonstrating high efficiency and excellent atom economy (For more details on the optimization procedure and results, see the Supporting Information). Enamines are frequently used as reactive intermediates in many organic transformation. Addition of trimethylsilyl cyanide (TMSCN, 2 equiv) and catalytic amounts of 2,2,2-trifluoroethanol (TFE) after the initial formation of 3a’ gratifyingly resulted in the formation of the corresponding α-amino nitrile 3a in 90% in less than 1

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

8

Page 9 of 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Catalysis

hour (for more information, see the Supporting Information). Attempts to obtain 3a by addition of TMSCN from the beginning of the reaction sequence did not result in the desired product and we only observed the formation of the corresponding amide. With the above conditions in hand, the scope of the catalytic reductive alkylation of amines into enamines followed by subsequent functionalization into α-amino nitriles in a one-pot reaction setup was studied in detail. As shown in Scheme 4, a variety of aryland alkyl-acetic acids were successfully used for the vinylation of pyrrolidine generating the corresponding enamines, which thereafter were further functionalized into the final products. Phenyl acetic acids carrying electron-donating or electron-withdrawing substituents gave the desired α-amino nitriles 3b, 3c, 3d and 3e, respectively in high yields (Scheme 4). The direct formation of α-amino nitrile 3e without dehalogenation allows for further functionalizations into even more complex structures. When 2-cyclohexylacetic acid was used as alkylating agent, a good 1H NMR yield was observed in the initial formation of the corresponding enamine, however, 3f was only isolated in moderate yield. High yield was achieved for double alkylation using 1,4-phenylenediacetic acid, giving in

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

9

ACS Catalysis 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 10 of 31

quantitative yield of the corresponding di-cyanation product 3h. Next, we turned out our attention to carboxylic acids containing different functional groups. Amino group (3i) and heterocycles (3j, 3k and 3l) were well tolerated giving the corresponding enamines and subsequent α-amino nitrile in moderate to high yields. In the case of trans-styrylacetic acid (1n), the conjugated intermediate enamine was quantitatively formed allowing for the formation of 3n in high yield. This catalytic methodology also tolerated acetals, terminal olefins and cyano groups and α-amino nitriles 3m, 3o and 3p, respectively, were obtained in high yields. To our delight, the hydroxyl moiety (3q) was not silylated under the reaction conditions, which demonstrates the high level of chemoselectivity of this protocol. When this catalytic protocol was applied on linear aliphatic acids and phenylacetic acids containing nitro and aldehydes groups, respectively, no or small amounts of the corresponding enamines were detected by 1H NMR analysis. Next, we focused on the alkylation of different amines (Scheme 5). Moderate basic amines such as morpholine afforded the enamine and the subsequent α-amino nitrile 3s in good yield. N-methyl amines are of special interest because of their role in the regulation of several biological processes.15 In this respect, N-methyl piperazine and

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

10

Page 11 of 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Catalysis

dimethyl amine were successfully vinylated with phenyl acetic acid to the corresponding enamines, and subsequently reacted with TMSCN to afford α-amino nitriles 3t and 3u, respectively, in good isolated yields. Interestingly, no reduction of the ester moiety on the piperidinyl carboxylate derivative was observed although the enamine (3v’) was only formed in 61% 1H NMR yield. When the amine containing an acetal moiety was used, high yield was obtained for α-amino nitrile 3y.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

11

ACS Catalysis 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

O R1 1

+ OH

1) Mo(CO)6 5 mol% Me(EtO)2SiH 4.5 equiv neat, 65 oC

HN

N 4-OMe: 3b 89%(90%) 3-OMe: 3c 89%(>95%)

3a 90%(89%)

CN

N

CN

N

3

3g, 88%(>95%)

Br

CN

CN

N

N

3d 90%(>95%)

3e 93%(97%)

CN CN

N

3f 66%(82%)

N

F3C

CN

MeO

N

CN R1

2) TMSCN 2 equiv TFE 0.001equiv, 60 min, r.t.

2a (1 equiv)

CN

Page 12 of 31

H 2N

CN

N

N

3h, 91%(>95%)

3i, 78%(90%)

OMe CN X

N

3l, 73%(77%)

CN

CN

N

NC

N

3m, 85%(>95%) CN

N 3o, 81%(>95%)

CN

O

N

X = S, 3j 90%(92%) X = O, 3k 93%(88%)

3n, 85%(88%)

O

CN

HN

HO

CN

N 3p, 71%(80%)

N 3q, 87%(90%)

Scheme 4. N-alkylation of 2a with various carboxylic acidsa. a

Isolated yields. In parenthesis

1H

NMR yields for the corresponding enamine using 1,3,5-

trimethoxybenzene as internal standard. Step 1: Mo(CO)6 (0.05 mmol), carboxylic acid (1.00 mmol), pyrrolidine 2a (1.01 mmol), Me(EtO)2SiH (4.50 equiv). For information about temperature and time for each substrate, see Table S3 in Supporting Information. Step 2: TMSCN (2.00 equiv), TFE (100 μL), r.t., 60 min.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

12

Page 13 of 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Catalysis

3

HN R + R2 OH 1a 2 (1 equiv) O

Ph

CN Ph

1) Mo(CO)6 5 mol% Me(EtO)2SiH 4.5 equiv neat, 65 oC

Ph

N 2 3 R

CN Ph

N

N 3r, 62% (70%)

Ph

2) TMSCN 2 equiv TFE 0.001 equiv, 60 min, r.t. CN

OMe

CN

3s, 55% (59%)

CN

N

O

Ph N

3t, 65% (70%)

Ph

Ph

CO2Me 3v, 55% (61%)

CN

N N

N

N

N

3u, 59% (60%)

CN CN

R3

N 3w, 67% (70%)

Ph

N

O

O 3y, 87% (94%)

Scheme 5. N-alkylation of different amines with 1aa. a

Isolated yields. In parenthesis

1H

NMR yields for the corresponding enamine using 1,3,5-

trimethoxybenzene as internal standard. Step 1: Mo(CO)6 (0.05 mmol), 1a (1.00 mmol), amine (1.01 mmol), Me(EtO)2SiH (4.50 equiv). For information about temperature and time for each substrate, see Table S3 in the Supporting Information. Step 2: TMSCN (2.00 equiv), TFE (100 μL), r.t., 60 min.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

13

ACS Catalysis 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 14 of 31

Anilines and primary aliphatic amines were poor substrates in this protocol, where Nmethyl anilines typically gave less than 20% 1H NMR yield of the desired enamine (not shown).

O OH

R1

+

R

2

H N

Mo(CO)6 5 mol% R

Me(EtO)2SiH 5 equiv THF 2M, 65 to 100 oC

3

N 4a, 86%

N

N

N

R 4b, R = OMe, 73% 4c, R = CF3, 91%

N 4d, 80%

N

4e, 90% N

O 4f, 91%

4g, 70%

R3

HCl

I

N

S

R1

N R2

Ph Ph

OMe 4h, 73%

4i, 98%

Scheme 6. N-alkylation of amines with benzoic acidsa.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

14

Page 15 of 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Catalysis

a

Isolated yields. Mo(CO)6 (0.05 mmol), carboxylic acid (1.00 mmol), starting amine (2.00 mmol),

Me(EtO)2SiH (5 equiv), THF (0.5 mL), 65 °C (2h) and then 100 °C (2h).

We thereafter investigated the use of benzoic acids as alkylating agents. In these cases, tetrahydrofuran (THF) as reaction media and two equivalents of the starting amine were required for a successful reaction outcome. Under these conditions, we studied a series of different benzoic acids, and the corresponding amines were isolated in good to high yields (Scheme 6). The methodology is applicable for both electron-rich and electron-poor benzoic acids. Methoxy-, trifluoromethyl- and iodobenzoic acids, aliphatic and heteroaryl-carboxylic acids were all well tolerated affording 4b, 4c, 4d, 4e and 4f, respectively, in good yields. Furthermore, functional groups such as olefins (4g) and esters (4h) remained untouched under the reaction conditions, which highlight the level of chemoselectivity of this methodology (Scheme 6). Some limitations using benzoic acids as alkylating agents were found when the reactions were carried out with acids containing alkyne, nitro and ketone functionalities.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

15

ACS Catalysis 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 16 of 31

In these cases we observed no formation of the alkylated amines (for more information, see the Supporting Information).

APPLICATIONS α-Amino nitriles are valuable bi-functional compounds due to their widespread use in chemistry and biology. One mode of reactivity of these compounds is via functional group interconversion of the nitrile group in which the original carbon atom connectivity is preserved. Furthermore, a highly relevant aspect in academia and industry is the ability to scale up catalytic protocols. With these aspects in mind, we performed the direct α-amino nitrile formation on a preparative scale followed by further functionalization of the nitrile group (Scheme 7). The α-amino nitrile formation was efficiently performed on a 10 mmol scale yielding 1.70 g of 3a, which subsequently was transformed into tetrazole 5, α-amino acid 6 and the carbon extended primary amide 7, in high yields.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

16

Page 17 of 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Catalysis

N N N NH Ph

O Ph

1) Mo(CO)6 5 mol% Me(EtO)2SiH 4.5 equiv 2a 1 equiv, neat, 65 oC, 4h

OH 2) TMSCN 2 equiv TFE 10M, 60 min, r.t. 1a 10 mmol

(a) CN Ph

(b)

N 3a 1.70 g

(c)

N 5, xx% COOH HCl N

Ph

6, 83% O

NH2

Ph 7, 90%

Scheme 7. Preparative scale and derivatization of 3a.a a

Isolated yields. Step 1: Mo(CO)6 (0.5 mmol), 1a (10.0 mmol), 2a (10.1 mmol), Me(EtO)2SiH (45.0 equiv),

65 °C, 4h. Step 2: TMSCN (20.0 equiv), TFE (1.0 mL), r.t., 60 min. (a) TMSN3 (10.0 equiv), Bu3SnO (0.6 equiv), toluene, 70 oC, 2 d; (b) HCl (37% wt), reflux, 24 h; (c) H2O2 (2.0 equiv), K2CO3 (1.2 equiv), DMSO, 40 °C, 4h.

To further demonstrate the applicability of this methodology we used standard reaction protocols for the functionalization the enamine 3a’, which was converted into triazoline 8, sulfonylformamidine 9, pyrimidinedione 10 and the TMS-propargylamine 11, respectively, in high yields under mild reaction conditions (Scheme 8). In the latter

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

17

ACS Catalysis 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 18 of 31

case, compound 11 was generated using trimethylsilyl-acetylene without the need of a copper source. 16 N N

N O

Ph

N 8, 88%

Ph

(b) O Ph 1a

HN OH +

2a

(a) Mo(CO)6 5 mol%

Ph

N

9, 80% (c)

N

Me(EtO)2SiH 4.5 equiv neat, 65 oC, 2h

O O S N

3a'

CN

(d)

(e) TMS

O Ph

Ph

N

O

N N

10, 85%

CN

11, 79%

Scheme 8. Further functionalization of 3a’.a a

Isolated yields. (a) Mo(CO)6 (0.05 mmol), 1a (1.00 mmol), 2a (1.01 mmol), Me(EtO)2SiH (4.50 equiv), 65

°C, 3h. (b) 1-(4-azidophenyl)ethan-1-one (1.50 mmol), TFE (100 μL), 40 °C, 2h (c) phenylmethanesulfonyl azide (1.50 mmol), TFE (100 μL), r.t., 40 min. (d) 4-cyanophenylisocyanate (2.00 mmol), TFE (100 μL), 65 °C, 2 h. (e) ethynyltrimethylsilane (2.00 mmol), TFE (100 μL), 65 °C, 2 h.

In addition we targeted the pharmaceutical active compound Piribedil, a dopamine D2 agonist used in the treatment of Parkinson disease and for circulatory disorders.17 The

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

18

Page 19 of 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Catalysis

use of the molybdenum-based catalytic protocol allowed a facile alkylation of Npyrimidylpiperazine with piperonylic acid, and Piribedil was isolated in 80% yield (Scheme 9).

H N

O O O

Mo(CO)6 5 mol%

N

OH + N

N

Me(EtO)2SiH 5 equiv THF 2M, 65 oC 2d to 80 oC 2h

O O

N N

N

N Piribedil yield: 80% Treatment for parkinsons diseases

Scheme 9. One pot synthesis of Piribedil.

REACTION PATHWAYS With respect to the reaction mechanism, two main pathways have been proposed for the alkylation of amines with carboxylic acids. Conventional reductive amination of aldehydes, generated by reduction of the corresponding acid,18 or a direct condensation reaction promoted by the hydrosilane to generate the subsequent carboxamide intermediate followed by in situ reduction.7b,19

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

19

ACS Catalysis 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 20 of 31

In order to obtain more information about the reaction mechanism, several control experiments were conducted. Since amide formation was detected during the optimization of reaction conditions and the evaluation of the scope of this protocol, initial formation of a carboxamide intermediate followed by a subsequent reduction of the amide appears to be a plausible reaction pathway. Indeed, the reaction of 2-phenyl-1pyrrolidinylethan-1-one 12, under same reaction conditions generated the enamine intermediate quantitatively (Scheme 10, a). When the reaction between 1a and pyrrolidine (2a) was carried out only in presence of Me(EtO)2SiH at 65 °C, we observed full conversion to amide 12 in 90 minutes. Moreover, using the same reaction setup without adding the silane, but with a catalytic amount of Mo(CO)6 present, resulted in full recovery of the starting materials after heating the reaction mixture at 65 °C for 90 minutes (Scheme 10, b). Additionally, we investigated if Mo(CO)6 had any effect on the reaction rate in the amidation step. We set up a series of experiments using phenylacetic acid (1a) and pyrrolidine (2a) as model substrates for the reactions, sampled aliquots at different time points and analyzed these by 1H NMR. Figure 1 displays the kinetic profiles for two different reaction setups, one using the standard

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

20

Page 21 of 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Catalysis

conditions, and in the second no catalyst was added. Both reactions were performed with the same initial concentrations of 1a and 2a. The results clearly demonstrate that Mo(CO)6 increase the rate of amide formation in comparison to the catalyst-free reaction, and most interestingly, first upon full conversion of amine and acid to amide, the enamine starts to form. Hence, the molybdenum catalyst plays a dual role in 1) increasing the rate of amide formation and 2) being essential in the enamine generating process. O (a)

Ph

N 12

Mo(CO)6 5 mol%

Ph

Me(EtO)2SiH 4.5 equiv neat, 65 oC, 3h

3a' >95% 1H NMR

N

O (b) Ph

O

2a 1 equiv

Ph

N

o OH neat, 65 C

1a (b.1) Me(EtO)2SiH 4.5 equiv, 90 min (b.2) Mo(CO)6, 90 min

+

Ph

N

12

3a'

>95%

-

-

-

Scheme 10. Mechanistic experiments.a a 1H

NMR yields using 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene as internal standard (a) Mo(CO)6 (0.05 mmol), 12 (0.50

mmol), Me(EtO)2SiH (4.5 equiv), 65 °C, 3h. (b) 1a (1.0 mmol), 2a (1.01 mmol), (b.1) Me(EtO)2SiH (4.5 equiv), 65 °C, 90 min. (b.2) Mo(CO)6 (0.05 mmol), 65 °C, 90 min.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

21

ACS Catalysis

O Ph

O Ph

N 12

100

NMR yield 12 (%)

N 12

80 Me(EtO) 2SiH 4.5 equiv

60

Mo(CO) 6 5 mol% Me(EtO) 2SiH 4.5 equiv

40

1H

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 22 of 31

20

Ph

N 3a'

0 0

20

40

60

80

100

120

time (minutes)

Figure 1. Kinetics profile using standard conditions and under absence of Mo(CO)6.a a 1H

NMR yields using 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene as internal standard. Mo(CO)6 (0.05 mmol), 1a (1 mmol),

2a (1.01 mmol), Mo(CO)6 (0.05 mmol), Me(EtO)2SiH (4.5 equiv), 65 °C, 90 min.

On the basis of the above-mentioned results and previous mechanistic investigations on the Mo(CO)6-catalyzed amide reduction by Pannell and co-workers,20 a plausible reaction mechanism is depicted in Scheme 11. The initial direct condensation reaction to generate the carboxamide intermediate is likely to proceed via formation of a silylester in a reaction between the carboxylic acid and the Mo-silane system. The silyl-ester act as an acylating agent reacting with the amine nucleophile to generate the amide. A

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

22

Page 23 of 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Catalysis

possible Lewis-acid activation of the silyl-ester by the Mo-catalyst is expected and can explain the increased reaction rate in this step. The reduction step where the enamine is generated requires a hydride-attack, catalyzed by the Mo-silane system, on the C=O bond of the amide to generate an intermediate silylhemiaminal which collapse into the enamine via a deprotonation-elimination step. As presented in Figure 1, the enamine 3a´ starts to form first upon completion of the amide generating step. A possible explanation for this behavior could be an inhibition of the Mo-catalyst by coordination of free amine to the metal center. Hence, at low amine concentration, the Mo-silane system becomes active and facilitate the formation of the enamine.

O R

Mo(CO)6

1

OH H

R3Si-H

H

R2

R

O[SiR3]

HNR2R3

O N

R

H

Mo-catalyzed HOSiR3 amidation step

R1

O 1

3

Mo(CO)6

H OM

R1

R3Si-H

N H

R2

R3

Deprotonation Elimination

Mo-catalyzed reduction step

H R1

N

R3

R2

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

23

ACS Catalysis 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 24 of 31

Scheme 11. A plausible reaction mechanism for the amidation-enamine formation reaction. SUMMARY In conclusion, we have developed a general and straightforward molybdenumcatalyzed reductive N-alkylation of amines with a variety of carboxylic acids in the presence of diethoxymethylsilane as reducing agent, which generate tertiary amines or enamines. The generated enamines were efficiently in situ trapped with various reagents to generate a variety of more complex organic compounds, e.g. α-amino nitriles, heterocycles and propargylamines. This green alkylation protocol, which avoid the isolation of synthetic intermediates, allows for a direct route to structurally diverse organic compounds from simple starting material, in a straightforward fashion. This catalytic protocol display an excellent level of chemoselectivity and it can furthermore be run on a preparative scale. The synthetic utility of this methodology on the formation of complex biologically active compounds was demonstrated in the preparation of the drug molecule, Piribedil.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

24

Page 25 of 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Catalysis

AUTHOR INFORMATION

Corresponding Author * [email protected]

ORCID

Hans Adolfsson: 0000-0001-5887-4630

Paz Trillo: 0000-0001-9540-630X

ASSOCIATED CONTENT

Supporting Information.

The following files are available free of charge.

Text, tables, and figures giving experimental procedures and characterization data (PDF)

ACKNOWLEDGMENT We would like to thank Drs. Tove Slagbrand, Fredrik Tinnis and Alexey Volkov for fruitful discussions in the early stage of this project. Financial support from the Swedish

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

25

ACS Catalysis 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 26 of 31

Research Council (grant # 2016-05316) and from Umeå University is gratefully acknowledged.

REFERENCES (1) (a) Ali, M. F.; Ali, B. E.; Speight, J. G. Handbook of Industrial Chemistry: Organic Chemicals, McGraw-Hill Education, New York, 2005. (b) Lawrence, S. A. Amines: Synthesis, Properties and Application. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2006. (c) Kleemann, A.; Engel, J.; Kutschener, B.; Reichert, D. Pharmaceutical Substances: Synthesis, Patents, Applications. 5th ed., Thieme, Stuttgart, New York, 2009. (d) Chatterjee, J.; Rechenmacher, F.; Kessler, H. N-Methylation of Peptides and Proteins: An Important Element for Modulating Biological Function.

Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 254-269. (e) Froidevaux, V.; Negrell, C.; Caillol, S. Biobased Amines: From Synthesis to Polymers; Present and Future. Chem.

Rev. 2016, 116, 14181-14224. (f) Allred, T. K.; Maroni, F.; Harran, P. G. Exploring the Boundaries of “Practical”: De Novo Syntheses of Complex Natural Product Based Drug Candidates. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 1194-12051. (2) (a) Pelletier, G.; Bechara, W. S.; Charette, A. B. Controlled and Chemoselective Reduction of Secondary Amides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 12817-12819. (b) Dodds, D. L.; Cole-Hamilton, D. J. Catalytic Reduction of Amides Avoiding LiAlH4 or B2H6 in Sustainable Catalysis: Challenges and Practices for the Pharmaceutical and Fine Chemical Industries. Eds: Dunn, P. J.; Hii, K. K.; Krische, M. J.; Williams, M. T. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, 2013, pp. 1-36; (c) Coetzee, J.; Dodds, D. L.; Klankermayer, J.; Brosinski, S.; Leitner, W.; Slawin, A. M. Z.; Cole-Hamilton, D. J. Homogeneous Catalytic Hydrogenation of Amides to Amines.

Chem. Eur. J. 2013, 19, 11039-11050. (d) Stein, M.; Breit, B. Catalytic Hydrogenation of Amides to Amines under Mild Reaction Conditions. Angew.

Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 2231-2234. (e) Smith, A. M.; Whyman, R. Review of Methods for the Catalytic Hydrogenation of Amides. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 5477-

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

26

Page 27 of 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Catalysis

5510. (f) Cabrero-Antonio, J. R.; Alberico, E.; Junge, K.; Junge, H.; Beller, M. Towards a General Ruthenium-Catalyzed Hydrogenation of Secondary and Tertiary Amides to Amines. Chem. Sci. 2016, 7, 3432-3442. (g) Li, B.; Sortais, J.B.; Darcel, C. Amine Synthesis via Transition Metal Homogeneous Catalysed Hydrosilylation. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 57603-57625. (h) Mukherjee, D.; Shirase, S.; Mashima, K.; Okuda, J. Chemoselective Reduction of Tertiary Amides to Amines Catalyzed by Triphenylborane. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 13326-13329. (i) Volkov, A.; Tinnis, F.; Slagbrand, T.; Trillo, P.; Adolfsson, H. Chemoselective Reduction of Carboxamides. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 6685-6697. (j) Mitsudome, T.; Miyagawa, K.; Maeno, Z.; Mizugaki, T.; Jitsukawa, K.; Yamasaki, J.; Kitagawa, K.; Kaneda, K. Mild Hydrogenation of Amides to Amines over a Platinum-Vanadium Bimetallic Catalyst. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 93919385. (3) (a) Crochet, P.; Cadierno, V. Ruthenium-Catalyzed Amide-Bond Formation. Top.

Organomet. Chem. 2015, 48, 81-118. (b) De Figueiredo, R. M.; Suppo, J.-S.; Campagne, J.-M. Nonclassical Routes for Amide Bond Formation. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 12029-12122. (c) Kreituss, I.; Bode, J.W. Catalytic Kinetic Resolution of Saturated N-heterocycles by Enantioselective Amidation with Chiral Hydroxamic Acid. Acc. Chem. Res. 2016, 116, 12029-12122. (d) Ojeda-Porras, A.; GambaSánchez, D. Recent Developments in Amide Synthesis Using Nonactivated Starting Materials. J. Org. Chem. 2016, 81, 11548-11555. (e) Noda, H.; Furutachi, M.; Asada, Y.; Shibasaki, M.; Kumagai, N. Unique Physicochemical and Catalytic Properties Dictated by the B3NO2 Ring System. Nat. Chem. 2017, 9, 571-577. (4) (a) Clarke, H. T.; Gillespie, H. B.; Weisshaus, S. Z. The Action of Formaldehyde on Amines and Amino Acids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1933, 55, 4571-4587. (b) Kim, S.; Oh, C. H.; Ko, J. S.; Ahn, K. H.; Kim, Y. J. Zinc-Modified Cyanoborohydride as a Selective Reducing Agent. J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50, 1927-1932. (c) Gomez, S.; Peters, J. A.; Maschmeyer, T. The Reductive Amination of Aldehydes and Ketones and the Hydrogenation of Nitriles: Mechanistic Aspects and Selectivity Control.

Adv. Synth. Catal. 2002, 344, 1037-1057. (d) Steinhuebel, D.; Sun, Y.; Matsumura, K.; Sayo, N.; Saito, T. Direct Asymmetric Reductive Amination. J. Am. Chem. Soc.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

27

ACS Catalysis 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 28 of 31

2009, 131, 11316-11317. (e) Wakchaure, V. N.; Zhou, J.; Hoffmann, S.; List, B. Catalytic Asymmetric Reductive Amination of α-Branched Ketones. Angew. Chem.

Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 4612-4614. (f) Chusov, D.; List, B. Reductive Amination without External Hydrogen Source. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 5199-5201. (g) Raoufmoghaddam, S. Recent Advances in Catalytic C–N Bond Formation: a Comparison of Cascade Hydroaminomethylation and Reductive Amination Reactions with the Corresponding Hydroamidomethylation and Reductive Amidation Reaction. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2014, 14, 7179-7193. (h) Jagadeesh, R. V.; Murugesan, K.; Alshammari, A. S.; Neumann, H.; Pohl, M.-M.; Radnik, J.; Beller, M. MOF-derived Cobalt Nanoparticles Catalyze a General Synthesis of Amines. Science 2017, 358, 326-332. (5) (a) Dub, P. A.; Ikariya, T. Catalytic Reductive Transformations of Carboxylic and Carbonic Acid Derivatives Using Molecular Hydrogen. ACS Catal. 2012, 2, 17181741; (b) Wekmeister, S.; Junge, K.; Beller, M. Catalytic Hydrogenation of Carboxylic Acid Esters, Amides, and Nitriles with Homogeneous Catalysts. Org.

Process. Res. Dev. 2014, 18, 289-302; (c) Just-Baringo, X.; Procter, D. J. Sm(II)Mediated Electron Transfer to Carboxylic Acid Derivatives: Development of Complexity-Generating Cascades. Acc. Chem. Res. 2015, 48, 1263-1275; (d) Pritchard, J.; Filonenko, G. A.; van Putten, R.; Hensen, E. J. M.; Pidko, E. A. Heterogeneous and Homogeneous Catalysis for the Hydrogenation of Carboxylic Acid Derivatives: History, Advances and Future Directions. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015,

44, 3808-3833; (e) Merel, D. S.; Do, M. L. T.; Gaillard, S.; Dupau, J.-L. IronCatalyzed Reduction of Carboxylic and Carbonic Acids Derivatives. Coord. Chem.

Rev. 2015, 288, 50-68: (f) Nagashima, H. Efficient Transition Metal-Catalyzed Reactions of Carboxylic Acid Derivatives with Hydrosilanes and Hydrosiloxanes, Afforded by Catalyst Design and the Proximity Effect of Two Si–H Groups. Synlett 2015, 26, 866-890. (6) Sorribes, I.; Junge, K.; Beller, M. Direct Catalytic N‑Alkylation of Amines with Carboxylic Acid. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 14314-14319. (7) (a) Fu, M.-C.; Shang, R.; Cheng, W.-M.; Fu, Y. Boron-Catalyzed N-Alkylation of Amines Using Carboxylic Acids. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 9042-9046. (b)

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

28

Page 29 of 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Catalysis

Zhang, M.-C.; Fu, M.-C.; Yu, H.-Z.; Fu, Y. Mechanism of Boron-Catalyzed N‑Alkylation of Amines with Carboxylic Acids. J. Org. Chem. 2016, 81, 6235-6243. (8) Nguyen, T. V. Q.; Yoo, W.-J.; Kobayashi, S. Chelating Bis(1,2,3-triazol-5-ylidene) Rhodium Complexes: Versatile Catalysts for Hydrosilylation Reactions. Adv.

Synth. Catal. 2016, 358, 452-458. (9) Andrews, K. G.; Summers, D. M.; Donnelly, L. J.; Denton, R. M. Catalytic Reductive N-alkylation of Amines Using Carboxylic Acids. Chem. Commun. 2016,

52, 1855-1858. (10) Minakawa, M.; Okubo, M.; Kawatsura, M. Ruthenium-Catalyzed Direct Nalkylation of Amines with Carboxylic Acids using Methylphenylsilane as a Hydride Source. Tetrahedron Lett. 2016, 57, 4187-4190. (11) (a) Tinnis, F.; Volkov, A.; Slagbrand, T.; Adolfsson, H. Chemoselective Reduction of Tertiary Amides Under Thermal Control: Formation of either Aldehydes or Amines. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 4562-4566. (12) (a) Slagbrand, T.; Volkov, A.; Trillo, P.; Tinnis, F.; Adolfsson, H. Transformation of Amides into Highly Functionalized Triazolines ACS Catal. 2017, 7, 1771-1775. (b) Slagbrand, T.; Kervefors, G.; Tinnis, F.; Adolfsson, H. An Efficient One–Pot Procedure for the Direct Preparation of 4,5-Dihydroisoxazoles from Amides. Adv.

Synth. Catal. 2017, 359, 1990-1995. (c) Trillo, P.; Slagbrand, T.; Tinnis, F.; Adolfsson,

H.;

Mild

Reductive

Functionalization

of

Amides

into

N-

Sulfonylformamidines. ChemistryOpen 2017, 6, 484-487. (d) Trillo, P.; Slagbrand, T.; Tinnis, F.; Adolfsson, H. Facile Preparation of Pyrimidinediones and Thioacrylamides Via Reductive Functionalization of Amides. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 9159-9162. (13) (a) Fuentes de Arriba, A. L.; Lenci, E.; Sonawane, M.; Formery, O.; Dixon, D. J. Iridium-Catalyzed Reductive Strecker Reaction for late-Stage Amide and Lactam Cyanation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 3655-3659. (b) Trillo, P.; Slagbrand, T.; Adolfsson, H. Straightforward α-Amino Nitrile Synthesis Through Mo(CO)6Catalyzed Reductive Functionalization of Carboxamide. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 12347-12351.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

29

ACS Catalysis 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 30 of 31

(14) a) Enders, D.; Shilvock, J. P. Some Recent Applications of α-Amino Nitrile Chemistry. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2000, 29, 359-373; b) González-Vera, J. A.; GarcíaLópez, M. T.; Herranz, R.; Potencial of Amino Acid-Derived α-Amino Nitriles for Generating Molecular Diversity. Mini-Reviews in Organic Chemistry, 2008, 5, 209221; c) Kouznetsov, V. V.; Puerto Galvis, C. E.; Strecker Reaction and α-Amino Nitriles: Recent Advances in their Chemistry, Synthesis and Biological Properties.

Tetrahedron 2018, 74, 773-810. (15) (a) Barreiro, E. J.; Kümmerle, A. E.; Fraga, C. A. M. The Methylation Effect in Medicinal Chemistry. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 5215-5246. (b) Chetterjee, J.; Rechenmacher, F.; Kessler, H. N-Methylation of Peptides and Proteins: An Important Element for Modulating Biological Functions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 254-269. (16) Huang, P.-Q.; Ou. W.; Han. F. Chemoselective Reductive Alkynylation of Tertiary Amides by Ir and Cu(I) Bis-metal Sequential Catalysis. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 11967-11970. (17) a) Cotin, M.; Riva, R.; Albani, F.; Baruzzi, A. Neurotransmitter Transporter: Fruitful Targets for CNS Drugs Discovery. CNS Drugs, 2000, 14, 439-455; b) Mittur, A. Piribedil: Antiparkinsonian Properties and Potential Clinical Utility in Dopaminergic Disorders. Curr. Drug Ther. 2011, 6, 17-34; c) Perez-Lloret, S.; Rascol, O. Piribedil for the Treatment of Motor and Non-motor Symptoms of Parkinson Disease. CNS Drugs 2016, 30, 703-717. (18) (a) Brown, H. C.; Krishnamurthy, S. Forty Years of Hydride Reductions.

Tetrahedron, 1979, 35, 567-607. (b) Seyden-Penne, J.; Reductions by the Alumino- and Borohydrides in Organic Synthesis, Wiley, New York, 2nd edn, 1997. (c) Burkhardt, E. R.; Matos, K. Boron Reagents in Process Chemistry: Excellent Tools for Selective Reduction. Chem. Rev., 2006, 106, 2617-2650. (d) M. B. Smith and J. March, March’s Advanced Organic Chemitry: Reactions, Mechanisms, and Structure, Wiley-Interscience, New York, 6th ed., 2007. (e) Zhang, M.; Li, N.; Tao, X.; Ruzi, R.; Yu, S.; Zhu, C. Selective Reduction of Carboxylic Acids to Aldehydes with Hydrosilane via Photoredox Catalysis. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 1022810231.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

30

Page 31 of 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Catalysis

(19) For Acylation of OH Moiety with Silanes, see: (a) Gilman, H.; Dunn, G. E.; Hartzfeld, H.; Smith, A. G. The Piperidine-catalyzed Reaction of Triphenylsilane with Some Hydroxy Compounds. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1955, 77, 1287-1288. (b) Chan, T.-H.; Wong, L.T.L. Silicon Tetrachloride as a Coupling Reagent for Amide Formation. J. Org. Chem. 1969, 34, 2766-2767. (c) Chan, T.-H.; Wong, L. T. L. Evaluation of Acyloxysilane as an Acylating Agent for Peptide Synthesis. J. Org.

Chem. 1971, 36, 850-853. (d) Lukevics, E.; Dzintara, M. Silylation of HydroxylContaining Compounds with Aryl and Heteroaryl-Hydrosilanes in the Presence of Amines. J. Organomet. Chem. 1984, 271, 307-317. (20) Arias-Ugarte, R.; Sharma, Morris, A. L. C.; A. J.; Pannell, K. H. Metal-Catalyzed Reduction of HCONR2’, R’ = Me (DMF), Et (DEF), by Silanes to Produce R’2NMe and Disiloxanes: A Mechanism Unraveled. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 848-851.

TABLE OF CONTENTS GRAPHIC

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

31