Dynamic Monolayer Gradients: Active Spatiotemporal Control of

Controlling Binding Site Densities on Glass Surfaces. Joshua R. ... Moon Suk Kim, Kwang Su Seo, Gilson Khang, and Hai Bang Lee. Langmuir 2005 21 (9), ...
0 downloads 0 Views 58KB Size
988

J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 988-989

Dynamic Monolayer Gradients: Active Spatiotemporal Control of Alkanethiol Coatings on Thin Gold Films Roger H. Terrill,† Karin M. Balss, Yumo Zhang, and Paul W. Bohn* Department of Chemistry, Beckman Institute and Materials Research Laboratory UniVersity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 600 South Mathews AVenue, Urbana, Illinois 61801 ReceiVed September 23, 1999 The chemical modification of coinage metal surfaces with ω-functionalized alkanethiols has proven to be a popular system for studies of wetting,1-3 adhesion,4-7 chemical affinity,8-12 and electron transfer.13-15 Varying the composition of binary hydrophilic-hydrophobic self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) can vary the wetting properties of a surface in a continuous manner,12,16 a fact that has been exploited to distribute surface-active molecules inhomogeneously under mass-transport control.17,18 One goal of these experiments is to create surfaces which permit supermolecular objects to be manipulated under external control, as recently demonstrated at air-liquid interfaces.19 Here we report chemical potential distributions of alkanethiols, which can be manipulated in both space and time under active electrochemical control. In-plane current passed in a thin (5 nm e d e 80 nm) Au film of resistivity, F(l),20 and cross-section, A, produces an in-plane potential, V(x),

V(x) ) V0 +

∫0x

iF(l) dl A

(1)

whose magnitude and position, relative to a solution reference couple, can be tuned by adjusting the magnitude of the current, i, and the potentiostat voltage offset, V0, respectively. Electro* To whom correspondence should be addressed. † Current address: Department of Chemistry, San Jose State University, One Washington Square, San Jose, CA 95192-0101. (1) Tao, Y.-T.; Lin, W.-L.; Hietpas, G. D.; Allara, D. L. J. Phys. Chem. B 1997, 101, 9732-9740. (2) Laibinis, P.; Whitesides, G.; Allara, D.; Tao, Y. T.; Parikh, A.; Nuzzo, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 7152-7167. (3) Laibinis, P. E.; Whitesides, G. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 19901995. (4) Tidwell, C.; Ertel, S.; Ratner, B.; Tarasevich, B.; Atre, S.; Allara, D. Langmuir 1997, 13, 3404-3413. (5) Mrksich, M.; Grunwell, J. R.; Whitesides, G. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 12009-12010. (6) Prime, K. L.; Whitesides, G. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 1071410721. (7) Lopez, G. P.; Albers, M. W.; Schreiber, S. L.; Carroll, R.; Peralta, E.; Whitesides, G. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 5877-5878. (8) Arduengo, A.; Moran, J.; Rodriguez-Parada, J.; Ward, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 6153-6154. (9) Sayre, C.; Collard, D. Langmuir 1995, 11, 302-306. (10) Evans, S.; Ulman, A.; Goppert-Berarducci, K.; Gerenser, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 5867-5868. (11) Chailapakul, O.; Crooks, R. Langmuir 1995, 11, 1329-1340. (12) Chaudhury, M.; Whitesides, G. Science 1992, 255, 1230-1232. (13) Chidsey, C.; Bertozzi, C.; Putvinski, T.; Mujsce, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 4301-4306. (14) Finklea, H.; Snider, D.; Fedyk, J.; Sabatani, E.; Gafni, Y.; Rubinstein, I. Langmuir 1993, 9, 3660-3667. (15) Sun, L.; Crooks, R. Langmuir 1993, 9, 1951-1954. (16) Liedberg, B.; Tengvall, P. Langmuir 1995, 11, 3821-3827. (17) Thome, J.; Himmelhaus, M.; Zharnikov, M.; Grunze, M. Langmuir 1998, 14, 7435. (18) Chaudhury, M.; Whitesides, G. Science 1992, 256, 1539-1541. (19) Gallardo, B. S.; Gupta, V. K.; Eagerton, F. D.; Jong, L. I.; Craig, V. S.; Shah, R. R.; Abbott, N. L. Science 1999, 283, 57-60. (20) The resistivity itself is a function of position21,22 according to the following, F(x) ) F0 + δ(x) + κΓ(x), where δ(x) represents a positiondependent stochastic fluctuation in the local resistivty, Γ(x) is the surface number density, and κ is a constant that depends on the chemical identity of the adsorbate. However, the stochastic and adsorption terms comprise typically an effect e 5%, so they are neglected in this treatment.

chemical phenomena typically produce currents 103 smaller than the in-plane current required to achieve, say ∆V ∼ 500 mV. However, the voltage noise produced by passing the in-plane current is some 104 smaller than the in-plane voltage,21,22 so electrochemical phenomena can be followed and spatial gradients in electrochemical potential transformed into surface chemical potential gradients. The electrochemical desorption of alkanethiols in methanolic KOH at potentials V < -0.8 V vs Ag/AgCl23-30 was used to establish static gradients in two-dimensional (surface) chemical potential. A 500 Å Au film was contacted by deoxygenated 0.5 M KOH/5 mM octanethiol (OT) in CH3OH in a flow-cell configuration, and cyclic voltammetry was performed to verify the potential of the cathodic stripping and anodic adsorption waves, cf. Figure 1.31 OT gradients were formed during 5-min electrolyses performed with a 15 mV mm-1 in-plane potential gradient, as implied by the top and bottom axes in Figure 1. The composition gradient was then captured by rapidly (