Subscriber access provided by GAZI UNIV
Article
Effect of Sulfated Chitooligosaccharides on Wheat Seedlings (Triticum aestivum L.) under Salt Stress ping zou, Kecheng Li, Song Liu, Xiaofei He, Ronge Xing, Xiaoqian Zhang, and Pengcheng Li J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.5b05624 • Publication Date (Web): 29 Feb 2016 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on March 3, 2016
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 27
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
1
Effect of Sulfated Chitooligosaccharides on Wheat Seedlings (Triticumaestivum L.)
2
under Salt Stress
3
Ping Zouab, Kecheng Lia, Song Liua*, XiaofeiHea, XiaoqianZhanga, Ronge Xinga,
4
Pengcheng Lia*
5
a
6
b
Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao 266071, China Institute of tobacco research of CAAS, Qingdao266101, China
7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
*Corresponding author:
15
Pengcheng Li
16
Tel.: +86 532 82898707; fax: +86 532 82968951.
17
E-mail addresses:
[email protected].
18
Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao 266071, PR China
19 20
Song Liu
21
E-mail addresses:
[email protected].
22
Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao 266071, PR China
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
23
Abstract: In this study, sulfated chitooligosaccharide (SCOS) was applied to wheat
24
seedlings in order to investigate its effect on the plants’ defence response under salt
25
stress. The antioxidant enzyme activities, chlorophyll contents and fluorescence
26
characters of wheat seedlings were determined at a certain time. The results showed
27
that treatment with exogenous SCOS could decrease the content of malondialdehyde,
28
increase the chlorophyll contents and modulate fluorescence characters in wheat
29
seedlings under salt stress. In addition, SCOS was able to regulate the activities of
30
antioxidant enzymes containing superoxide dismutase, catalase, peroxidase, ascorbate
31
peroxidase, glutathione reductase and dehydroascorbate reductase. Similarly, the
32
mRNA expression levels of several antioxidant enzymes were efficiently modulated
33
by SCOS. The results indicated that SCOS could alleviate the damage of salt stress by
34
adjusting the antioxidant enzyme activities of plant. And the effect of SCOS on
35
photochemical efficiency of wheat seedlings was associated with its enhanced
36
capacity for antioxidant enzymes which prevented structure degradation of the
37
photosynthetic apparatus under NaCl stress. Furthermore, the effective activities of
38
alleviating salt stress indicated the activities of SCOS were closely related with the
39
sulfate group.
40
Key words: wheat; sulfated chitooligosaccharides; salt stress; antioxidant enzyme
41
activities; photochemical efficiency; gene expression
42 43 44
Introduction Salt stress is an important factor that limits crop growth, productivity and yield.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 2 of 27
Page 3 of 27
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
45
Several physiological processes especially photosynthesis in plants are affected by
46
salt stress. The influences of salt stress on photosynthesis are either direct (such as the
47
limitation of the stomata) or indirect, for instance, the oxidative stress1. The damage
48
of oxidative stress to plant is related to the excess production of reactive oxygen
49
species (ROS)2. ROS can exert a series of physiological responses including changes
50
in cellular structure and degradation of proteins3. The antioxidant enzymes strictly
51
regulate the ROS production by ROS scavenging pathways. The major antioxidant
52
enzymes of plants include superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), peroxidase
53
(POD), glutathione reductase (GR), ascorbate peroxidase (APX) and
54
dehydroascorbate reductase (DHAR) etc.4,5. All of them play critical roles in ROS
55
removing which is directly with the relevant of defence against various abiotic stress
56
of plant.
57
Polysaccharides have been demonstrated to scavenge free radicals in vitro6-9. The
58
antioxidant activity of polysaccharides depends on several structural parameters, such
59
as the molecular weight6, type and position of substitute groups, such as acetyl7,
60
sulfate and phosphate8,9. Chitosan and its derivatives exhibit pronounced antioxidant
61
activity. Like other polysaccharides, the antioxidant activity of chitosan appears to be
62
dependent on its molecular weight, substitution groups and so on. N-carboxymethyl
63
oligosaccharides5, aminoethyl chitosan10, and low molecular weight chitosans11
64
showed high ROS scavenging effects. Xing12et al. found that sulfated chitosan also
65
had strong scavenging ability on free radicals. Thus, sulfated chitosan could be a
66
potential type of antioxidants for reducing salt stress on plants. Our previous study on
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
67
different molecular weight of chitooligosaccharide (COS), showed enhancing salt
68
tolerance of wheat seedlings under 0.01% 1300 Da of COS. Therefore, the purpose of
69
present study to investigate the effect of sulfated chitooligosaccharide (SCOS) and
70
COS on wheat seedlings under salt stress. Furthermore, we evaluated the expression
71
of some of salt-associated genes in wheat treated with SCOS.
72 73 74
Materials and methods Preparation of SCOS. SCOS was obtained according to the method given by Xing
75
et al.13. The weight average molecular weight (Mw) was measured using a high
76
performance liquid chromatography (HPLC, Agilent Technologies, USA). A TSK
77
G3000-PWXL column was utilized for chromatography. A 0.2 M CH3COOH/0.1 M
78
CH3COONa aqueous solution was used as mobile phases at a flow velocity of 0.8
79
ml/min. Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra of samples were detected in the
80
range of 4000 to 400 cm−1 regions using a FT-IR spectrometer (Thermo Scientific
81
Nicolet iS10, USA) in KBr discs. The sulfate content was measured by BaCl2-gelatin
82
turbidity method.
83
Plant material and treatments. The wheat (Triticumaestivum L.Jimai 22) seeds
84
were surface sterilized with a 1% sodium hypochlorite solution. 10 min later they
85
were thoroughly washed with deionized water. Then seeds were soaked in deionized
86
water for 5 h and then transferred into a petri dish with moist gauze for germination at
87
25°C for 24 h in the dark. Germinated seeds were sowed in petri dishes with nylon
88
mesh and were grown in Hoagland solution in incubator. The day/night cycle was 14
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 4 of 27
Page 5 of 27
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
89
h/10 h, at 25°C/20°C, respectively. The relative humidity was 60% and the strength of
90
illumination was 800 µmolm−2s−1. 10 d after sowing, wheat seedlings were transferred
91
to Hoagland solution with 100 mMNaCl. Meanwhile, the wheat seedlings were
92
divided into five groups, containing a control check (CK, neither SCOS nor NaCl)
93
group, NaCl stressed as a negative control, salicylic acid (0.01% SA) treated as a
94
positive control, a SCOS-NaCl stressed (treated with 0.01% SCOS) group and a
95
COS-NaCl stressed (treated with 0.01% COS) group. The nutrient solution was
96
renewed every other day. After 2 h, 5 d and 10 d of treatment, the growth situation,
97
physiological indices and genes expression of salt tolerance of wheat seedlings in
98
different group were determined.
99
Growth parameters. After 10 d of NaCl treatment, wheat seedlings of each group
100
were harvested for determination of shoot length, root length and wet weight; after
101
which samples were dried at 105°C for 2 h to obtain dry weight.
102
Lipid peroxidation degrees. Malondialdehyde (MDA) content indicates the degree
103
of lipid peroxidation in plants. It was detected using a thiobarbituric acid (TBA)
104
reaction14. After 2 h, 5 d and 10 d of NaCl treatment respectively, 0.5 g leaf samples
105
were homogenized in 10% (w/v) trichloroacetic acid (TCA). Then the homogenates
106
were centrifuged at 4000 g for 10 min. Afterwards, 2 ml of 0.6% TBA was added into
107
2 ml supernatant, and the solution was heated in boiling water for 15 min and cooled
108
immediately afterwards. Next, the solution was centrifuged at 10,000 g for 15 min.
109
Then the absorbance was read at 450 nm, 532 nm and 600 nm, separately. The MDA
110
content was calculated as µg MDA g-1 fresh weight (FW).
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
111
Antioxidant enzyme activities. After 2 h, 5 d and10 d of NaCl treatment
112
respectively, the second fully expanded leaves samples (0.5 g) were homogenized in
113
liquid nitrogen and brought up to a volume of 5 ml by cold sodium phosphate buffer
114
(pH 7.8). Then the solution was centrifuged at 12000 g at 4°C for 15 min, after which
115
the enzyme activities were determined immediately.
116
The total soluble protein was detected using the means of Bradford15. A total of 100
117
µl supernatant and 5 ml of Coomassie brilliant blue G250 staining were mixed, and
118
then the absorbance was reported at 595 nm. SOD activity was determined by the
119
inhibition of the photoreduction of nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT)16. One unit of SOD
120
was defined as the amount of enzyme corresponding to 50% inhibition of the NBT
121
reduction. The decrease in the absorbance at 240 nm was used for definition of CAT
122
activity. The CAT activity was calculated as H2O2 reduced mg-1 protein min-117. The
123
means reported by Seckinet al.14 was used to determine POD activity. The POD
124
activity was calculated on account of the rate of formation of guaiacol
125
dehydrogenation and defined as µmol GDHP mg-1 protein min-1. The absorbance was
126
read at 470 nm.
127
APX was measured by the procedure of Nguyen18. The APX activity was
128
calculated from the decline in absorbance at 290 nm. DHAR activity was estimated
129
according to Mishra19 by assaying the decline of DHA at 265 nm. DHAR activity is
130
defined as µmol DHA reduced mg-1 protein min-1. The activity of GR was determined
131
by the means of Mandhania20. The decrease in absorbance was read at 340 nm. GR
132
activity was defined as 0.1 µmol oxidized NADPH mg-1 protein min-1.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 6 of 27
Page 7 of 27
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
133
Analysis of genes expression. Total RNA was extracted from wheat leaves (0.2 g)
134
using PureLink® RNA Mini Kit (Life Technologies, USA). Total RNA was quantified
135
by UV spectrophotometer. RevertAidTM First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Takara,
136
Dalian, China) was used for the synthesis of first-strand cDNA. qRT-PCR was
137
performed in an Eppendorf Master cycler (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany) using the
138
SYBR ExScript qRT-PCR Kit (Takara, Dalian, China) as reported by Li et al.21. The
139
expression levels of genes were analysed using comparative threshold cycle method
140
(2-∆∆Ct) with β-actin as the control. Specific primers for each gene were designed in
141
Table.S1.
142
Chlorophyll contents and fluorescence characters. After 2 h, 5 d and 10 d of
143
NaCl treatment, chlorophyll a (Chl (a)), chlorophyll b (Chl (b)) and total chlorophyll
144
(Chl (a+b)) content were measured with 95% ethanol22. Chlorophyll fluorescence
145
parameters were detected utilizing a chlorophyll fluorescence system (PAM-2100,
146
Walz, Germany). The chlorophyll fluorescence parameters were assayed after dark
147
adaptation for 30 min.
148
Statistical analysis. Each test was performed in triplicate, and the results were
149
averaged. Data were subjected to ANOVA analysis by SPSS (version 19.0) and
150
Duncan's test (P<0.05) to compare the mean value of different treatments. Each of
151
the data points were expressed as the average ± SD of three independent replicates.
152 153 154
Results and discussion Preparation of SCOS. The Mw of sulfated COS measured by HPLC is
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
155
approximately 1600 Da (Fig.S1) and the sulfate content of SCOS is 48.5%. Fig.S2
156
depicts the FT-IR spectrum of SCOS, due to the sulfo groups, characteristic
157
absorptions at 1204 and 794 cm-1 were assigned to S=O and C–O–S bond stretching
158
respectively. Because of the pyranose units in the polysaccharide, the peak at 934
159
cm-1proved the cyclic pyranosyl rings were not destroyed by microwave radiation23.
160
Plant growth and biomass accumulation. As shown in Table 1, shoot length, root
161
length, wet weight and dry weight were significantly inhibited under 100 mM NaCl
162
treatment (P