ARTICLE pubs.acs.org/jpr
Effector Granules in Human T Lymphocytes: Proteomic Evidence for Two Distinct Species of Cytotoxic Effector Vesicles Hendrik Schmidt,† Christoph Gelhaus,‡ Melanie Nebendahl,† Marcus Lettau,† Ralph Lucius,§ Matthias Leippe,‡ Dietrich Kabelitz,† and Ottmar Janssen*,† †
Institute of Immunology, ‡Zoological Institute, and §Institute of Anatomy, Christian-Albrechts-University, Kiel, Germany
bS Supporting Information ABSTRACT: Cytotoxic T cells mobilize effector proteins from prestored lysosomal compartments. Since different activation signals result in alternative routes of target cell killing, utilizing either FasL or the granzyme B/perforin pathway, the existence of distinct forms of effector granules was recently suggested. Applying a protocol for the separation of intact organelles from activated T lymphoblasts, we noticed that FasL-associated secretory lysosomes (SL) segregate from vesicles containing larger amounts of granzymes and granulysin. We previously analyzed the proteome of secretory lysosomes from NK and T cells and now describe the proteome of granzyme-containing vesicles. Moreover, intact FasL-associated SL and granzymecontaining vesicles were compared by electron microscopy and respective extracts were characterized by Western blotting. With the present report, we provide a comprehensive proteome map of granzyme-containing granules and unequivocally demonstrate that T lymphoblasts contain at least two distinct types of effector vesicles. Moreover, the overall protein content of the two vesicle populations was compared by 2D difference gel electrophoresis. Interestingly, the observed differences in protein distribution were not restricted to effector proteins but also applied to cytoskeleton-associated elements that could argue for a differential transport or initiation of degranulation. To our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive description of distinct effector granules in T cells. KEYWORDS: 2D-electrophoresis, 2D-DIGE, proteome analysis, mass spectrometry, organelles, secretory lysosomes, T lymphocytes, FasL, granzymes
’ INTRODUCTION Cytotoxic T cells (CTL) lyse their target cells through the surface expression of Fas ligand (FasL) and/or the release of soluble mediators such as perforin, granzymes and granulysin. According to a widely accepted model, lytic effector proteins are stored in so-called secretory lysosomes (SL), which are bifunctional organelles that combine degradative and secretory properties.1,2 This model was based on the observation that intracellular FasL, which is regarded as the marker protein for SL, colocalizes with other lysosomal markers such as LAMP-1 (CD107a), LAMP-3 (CD63), and also with effector proteins including perforin and granzymes.3,4 Upon target cell contact, degranulation of a single type of organelles would ensure a coordinated surface expression of FasL and the simultaneous delivery of effector molecules into the immunological synapse. In recent years, however, a more complex regulation of FasL expression has been shown for human and murine T cells.5,6 Upon activation, we observed a biphasic FasL surface appearance on human T and NK cells and showed that phase one (minutes after stimulation) relies on an actin-dependent mobilization of preformed FasL whereas phase two (hours after stimulation) requires de novo protein synthesis.5 These two waves of FasL r 2011 American Chemical Society
appearance were also observed in murine CTLs by He and Ostergaard.6 They suggested that the FasL phase one release results in a rapid target cell elimination in response to low concentrations of antigen. In contrast, the second wave depends on newly synthesized FasL, requires higher antigen concentrations and mediates extensive Fas-dependent bystander killing in the absence of detectable degranulation. Based on the observation that FasL was found in vesicles distinct from cytolytic granules, it was concluded that the lytic mechanisms are fully independent with respect to localization and regulation of the individual cytotoxic components.6,7 A differential regulation of FasL and cytotoxic granules was then supported by Kassahn and colleagues, who demonstrated that the activation-induced exocytosis of FasL had other requirements than the surface appearance of the granule (lysosome) markers CD63 (LAMP-3) and CD107a (LAMP-1).8 In fact, the presence of two differentially regulated CTL effector pathways had already been suggested in 1998, when Kessler and colleagues reported that a weak TCR signal would still lead to Fas-dependent cytotoxicity whereas perforin-dependent killing required a stronger TCR signal.9 Received: September 21, 2010 Published: January 19, 2011 1603
dx.doi.org/10.1021/pr100967v | J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10, 1603–1620
Journal of Proteome Research We have recently provided a protocol to enrich FasL-associated secretory lysosomes from lymphocytes.10 When we characterized individual fractions of a given organelle preparation by Western blotting, we noticed that not all cytotoxic effector molecules display a comparable distribution pattern. As described, FasL-associated secretory lysosomes are reproducibly enriched in gradient fraction 2 of T and NK cells.10-12 In contrast, intact vesicles containing high amounts of granzymes A and B and granulysin separated from SL and were found in fraction 6 of the applied gradient.10 Having analyzed the luminal proteome of FasL-containing vesicles in NK cells11 and T cell blasts,12 we now determined the protein content of fraction 6 vesicles. Furthermore, we directly compared the proteome of the FasL-associated SL compartment and the granzyme B-rich compartment using 2D difference gel electrophoresis. Based on these 2D-DIGE results, we verified several of the observed differences by Western blotting. In conclusion, we provide the first biochemical evidence for the coexistence of two types of cytotoxic effector granules in activated lymphocytes.
’ MATERIAL AND METHODS Cells
Human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were isolated from buffy coat preparations by Ficoll density gradient centrifugation. T cells were further purified by MACS Cell Isolation Kits (Miltenyi, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany). To obtain activated T lymphoblasts, the cells were stimulated with phytohemagglutinin A (PHA, 0.5 μg/mL; Remel, Lenexa, KS) and further expanded in the presence of recombinant human interleukin 2 as described.13 Cells were kept in RPMI1640 with HEPES and L-glutamine, 5% fetal calf serum and antibiotics at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2. Subcellular Fractionation
Organelle fractions were separated following the recently described procedure.10 In brief, 4 108 cells were carefully disrupted in a dounce glass homogenizer and organelles where enriched by differential centrifugation. The enriched organelles were placed on a nonionic, low osmotic discontinuous density gradient with 27, 22.5, 19, 16, 12, and 8% OptiPrep (Sigma, Deisenhofen, Germany) and centrifuged at 150 000 g for 5 h in a SW60Ti swing-out rotor (Beckman Coulter, Krefeld, Germany). Obtained organelles were washed and lysed for further downstream analyses. Confocal Microscopy
PHA-stimulated lymphocytes were fixed with 3% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized with Triton X-100 and stained with antigranulysin (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) and anti-goat AlexaFluor555 (Invitrogen) and, after extensive washes, with AlexaFluor647-conjugated anti-granzyme B (clone GB11, BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ) and FITC-labeled antigranzyme A (clone GrA-11, Immunotools, Friesoythe, Germany). Alternatively, samples were stained with anti-FasL mAb NOK-1 (BD Biosciences) and AlexaFluor488-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany), and subsequently with AlexaFluor647-labeled antigranzyme B mAb. Stained samples were mounted with ProLong Gold antifade reagent with DAPI (Invitrogen) and analyzed on a LSM 510 Meta laser scanning microscope (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany). Images were acquired via scanning through the x-y-plane with 63 objective lenses. Laser intensity and detectors were adjusted to a uniformly
ARTICLE
negative signal of the control samples stained with control IgG and second step antibodies. Western Blot Analysis
For Western blotting, the protein content of individual samples was determined using the Coomassie Protein Assay Reagent (Pierce, Rockford, IL). Five μg of protein per fraction were separated on Bis-Tris gels (4-12%, Invitrogen). After transfer to nitrocellulose membranes and blocking with 5% bovine serum albumin or fat-free dry milk in TBST following the individual manufacturer’s recommendations, the fractions were analyzed using anti-FasL mAb (clone G-247.4, BD Biosciences), antiCD63 clone MEM-259 (Acris Antibodies, Herford, Germany), anti-LAMP-1 mAb clone 25 (BD Biosciences), anti-cathepsin D clone CTD-19 (Sigma), anti-Vti-1b clone 7 (BD Biosciences), anti-pan-cadherin clone ab22744 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK), anticytochrome oxidase IV (CoxIV) clone 10G8D12C12 (MitoScience, Eugene, OR), anti-Bip/Grp78 clone 40 (BD Biosciences), antigranzyme B clone 2C5/F5 (BD Biosciences) and anti-granulysin polyclonal antibodies (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA). The following antibodies were used for verification at later stages: anti-β-actin clone AC-15 (Sigma), anti-DPPIV clone 222113 (R&D Systems), anti-Ezrin/Radixin/Moesin (ERM) polyclonal rabbit sera (Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA), anti-granzyme A clone YMH01 (R&D Systems), antimyosin IIA polyclonal sera (Abcam), anti-dynamin I/II polyclonal rabbit sera (Cell Signaling) and anti-flotilin-1 clone 18 (BD Biosciences) with respective horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibodies (GE Healthcare, Munich, Germany). For reprobing, membranes were incubated in stripping solution for 25 min at 56 °C. ECL detection reagents were used for chemiluminescence detection using Hyper Film (GE Healthcare). Transmission Electron Microscopy
Enriched organelles of fractions 2 and 6 were fixed with 3% paraformaldehyde in PBS at 4 °C overnight, washed in PBS, postfixed in 2% OsO4, dehydrated in ethanol, and embedded in Araldite (Sigma). Ultrathin sections were mounted on Formvarcoated grids and double-stained with a saturated solution of uranyl acetate in 70% methanol and lead citrate. The grids were examined with a Zeiss EM 900 transmission electron microscope equipped with a digital camera system. 2D-Electrophoresis, Image Analysis and Spot Picking
For 2D electrophoresis, pellets of fraction 6 isolates were lyzed on ice for 30 min as described before.11 A total amount of 250 μg of protein was mixed with rehydration buffer and applied by cuploading onto 24 cm IPG strips (nonlinear, pH 3-11). Isoelectric focusing (IEF) was carried out following the described standardized scheme.10 The second dimension was performed on large format (26 20 cm) 12.5% polyacrylamide gels. Gels were stained with Flamingo Pink (Bio Rad, Munich, Germany), mounted on a nonbacked gel frame, scanned on a Typhoon Trio (GE Healthcare) and analyzed using Image Master 6.0 (GE Healthcare). Selected spots were picked with a 2 mm picking head. The picked gels were again scanned to verify the correct location of the punched spots. For 2D difference gel electrophoresis (2D-DIGE), 50 μg of the fraction 2 and 6 extracts were labeled with Cy3 or Cy5, respectively (CyDyes, GE Healthcare). A pool of all samples was labeled with Cy2 and served as an internal standard for biological variance analysis (BVA). After quenching with lysine, the differentially labeled samples were pooled and applied to 2D-electrophoresis 1604
dx.doi.org/10.1021/pr100967v |J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10, 1603–1620
Journal of Proteome Research
ARTICLE
Figure 1. Colocalization of cytotoxic proteins in T cell blasts. PHA stimulated lymphocytes were fixed and stained as described in Materials and Methods for (A) granzyme B and FasL or for (B) granzyme B, granzyme A and granulysin.
Figure 3. Organelle characteristics analyzed by transmission electron microscopical inspection. Comparison of organelles obtained in fractions 2 (A,B) and 6 (C,D). Enriched organelles from lymphoblasts were fixed and embedded in Araldite. Overview pictures are given in (A) and (C), magnified areas are shown in (B) and (D).
Figure 2. Cytotoxic proteins segregate in different fractions. Equal amounts of whole cell lysate (WL), enriched organelles (EO) and six fractions collected after density gradient centrifugation of PHA blasts were separated and transferred to NC. Blots were probed with antibodies against the indicated proteins. Note that the two distinct granulysin bands represent the unprocessed proform and the processed active form of 15 and 9 kDa, respectively.
as described above. Image analysis of the scanned fluorescent gels using differential in-gel analysis (DIA) included in the DeCyder 6.5 software (GE Healthcare). For BVA, Cy2 gel images were merged; spot boundaries were detected followed by a normalization of the spot volumes revealing differential spots with a t test filter set to 0.05.
entries) updated frequently with MASCOT using the following parameters: the modification on cysteine residues by carbamidomethylation was set as obligate, methionine oxidation was considered as a potential modification; the maximum number of missed tryptic cleavages was one; the monoisotopic masses were considered and the mass tolerance was set to (50 ppm, and the fragment-ion mass tolerance was set to 0.2 Da (MS/MS). A protein was accepted to be identified when the total protein score reached or exceeded the MASCOT score threshold (g66 with a probability of identification greater 95%). Repetitive searches against a randomized decoy database (http://www.matrixscience. com/help/decoy_help.html) using the decoy.pl script and identical search parameters let to a false-positive rate of 2.8%. Classification of Proteins
The classification of individual proteins according to their localization was based on the Uni-Prot knowledge base, the ihop database14 and the iProXpress database15 from the “Protein Information Resource” (GUMC, Washington, D.C.).
In-Gel Tryptic Digestion and Mass Spectrometry
Mass spectrometric analyses were performed on a 4700 Proteomics Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Framingham, MA) with minor modifications as described before.11 Ten microliters sequencing grade porcine trypsin (Serva, Heidelberg, Germany) at a concentration of 10 ng/μL in 5 mM ammonium bicarbonate were applied per spot for in-gel proteolysis. For the parent runs, mass spectra were internally calibrated with the masses of trypsin’s autolysis products with 25 ppm mass tolerance. Five precursors per spectrum were selected from the most intense peaks and submitted to MSMS analyses. The updated default calibration was used for MSMS measurements. Masses were searched in NCBI nonredundant database (10/10/2008, 217 337
’ RESULTS Localization of Lysosome-Associated Effector Proteins in T Cell Blasts
In order to visualize the presence of secretory lysosomes in human T cell blasts, most laboratories routinely employ confocal microscopy. In general, costaining for FasL and other characteristic lysosomal markers including cathepsin D, LAMP-1 or CD63 reveals a high degree of colocalization.3,4,13,16-18 As depicted in Figure 1A, confocal imaging in fact suggested a FasL colocalization with effector proteins such as granzyme B in larger vesicular structures. Using the same settings for detection, a colocalization of granzyme 1605
dx.doi.org/10.1021/pr100967v |J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10, 1603–1620
Journal of Proteome Research
ARTICLE
Figure 4. Proteomic map of fraction 6 granules. Lysates of fraction 6 organelles were separated on pH 3-11NL IPG strips in the first dimension and on 12.5% Tris-glycin gels in the second dimension. Flamingo Pink staining was used for protein visualization. Annotated numbers of 379 identified spots refer to Table S1 (Supporting Information). Enlarged quadrants of the gel image are available as Supporting Information (Figure S6A-D).
B with granzyme A and granulysin, two other effector proteins released by degranulation, is shown in Figure 1B. In view of the recent discussion on the existence of distinct lysosomal compartments for degranulation and transport of FasL,6-8 and based on the biochemical evidence that we had obtained earlier, we decided to address this issue in more detail and to perform a thorough biochemical analysis of enriched organelles from T cell blasts. Western Blot Analyses Suggest the Existence of Distinct Effector Granules
FasL serves as an accepted marker protein for secretory lysosomes (SL) from T and NK cells.16 As detected by Western blotting, FasL is reproducibly enriched in fraction 2 vesicles of a standardized Iodixanol gradient.10 This fraction is further characterized by an enrichment of lysosomal membrane proteins (LAMP-1, CD63) and lysosomal hydrolases such as cathepsin D (Figure 2). Assuming that fraction 2 vesicles represent FasLcontaining SL, we recently compiled the luminal proteome of secretory lysosomes from NK cells11 and activated T cells.12 Interestingly, perforin and granzymes A and B were not always detected in the SL fraction at comparable levels. As shown in detail for different NK cell populations, these effector proteins were unevenly distributed in isolates from individual cell populations indicating potential differences in granular distribution and effector function.11 As demonstrated in Figure 2, Western blotting of individual fractions from T cell blasts confirmed that granzyme B and granulysin were significantly enriched in fraction 6 and not in fraction 2 (as initially anticipated). Moreover, granulysin showed a particularly interesting fractionation pattern with the 15 kDa precursor form being enriched in fraction 2 and the processed active 9 kDa form being significantly enriched in fraction 6. To test whether the two fractions were devoid of potential organelle contaminants, we used antibodies against
marker proteins for plasma membrane (cadherin), mitochondria (CoxIV) and endoplasmic reticulum (Bip/Grp78). Here, we only detected some minor contaminations with ER proteins in fraction 2. Morphological Characteristics of Organelles in Different Fractions
For the description of the organelle enrichment protocol, we had already contrasted organelles obtained in fraction 2 to those in fraction 6 of our gradient.10 We also compared intact fraction 2 vesicles and organelles found in fraction 5 (mitochondria).12 To verify these results and to highlight the differences between the two types of vesicles containing cytotoxic effector proteins, we analyzed additional samples by electron microscopy employing a slightly modified fixation protocol. As shown in Figure 3, fraction 2 vesicles show a maximum diameter of 700 nm. Structurally, these vesicles display a homogeneous appearance with an dense lumen surrounded by a double membrane. Of note, only in fraction 2 preparations, we also infrequently observed organelles displaying a multivesicular structure (Figure S1A, Supporting Information). In contrast, fraction 6 contained a homogeneous organelle population with the characteristic morphology that we described before.10 With a diameter of up to 300 nm, these membrane-surrounded granules were mostly smaller than fraction 2 vesicles. They displayed electron-dense cores and in most cases a characteristic inner circular, membrane-surrounded structure that suggested a polar content distribution (Figure 3D, Figure S1B, Supporting Information). Proteome of Fraction 6 Vesicles
To further characterize fraction 6 vesicles, we deciphered the proteome of respective isolates from human T cell blasts. From two preparative gels, we identified 379 spots representing 240 individual proteins. According to the subsequent database analyses, 67% of the identified proteins had been associated 1606
dx.doi.org/10.1021/pr100967v |J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10, 1603–1620
Journal of Proteome Research
ARTICLE
Table 1. Proteome of Iodixanol Gradient Fraction 6 Vesicles from T Lymphoblastsa spot no. replicates
Uni-Prot no.
MW, Da
pI
% seq. MASCOT coverage
function
subcellular localization
protein name
acc. no. gi|77404397 gi|157502193
Q7KZF4 102618 Q9UNM6 43203
6.7 5.5
400 265
36 19
transcription protein binding
ER,ME,PL ME
gi|4504505 gi|12654583 gi|49168620 gi|5031599 gi|119618319 gi|5031593 gi|15277503 gi|5031571 gi|5031573 gi|29029550 gi|178413 gi|1419374 gi|18645167 gi|4757810 gi|4885079 gi|55959356
P51659 80092 P05388 34424 Q99798 86155 O15144 34426 O15145 19108 O15511 16367 P60709 40536 P61160 45017 P61158 47797 Q9NZK5 59180 P35475 72988 O00754 111834 Q8TBV2 38780 P25705 59828 P36542 32917 P24539 22318
9.0 5.4 7.1 6.8 8.7 5.5 5.6 6.3 5.6 7.8 9.3 6.7 7.6 9.2 9.3 9.3
341 378 447 504 150 102 641 552 536 280 203 206 439 593 326 91
25 41 22 59 30 37 53 43 36 27 15 9 56 50 28 23
multifuntional ribonucleoprotein hydrolase trafficking trafficking trafficking trafficking trafficking trafficking hydrolase hydrolase hydrolase vesicle fusion ion transport ion transport ion transport
ER,ME,EN,PE ER,EN,ME EX,SY,MT,NU EN,ME,PL EN,ME,PL,ER EN,ME ER,ME,EX,PL,SY ER,EN,ME ER,EN,ME secreted LY LY,ME ME ER,LY,NG,SY,MT LY;ME,MT LY,ME,MT
gi|51479152
O75947
15820
6.6
127
33
ion transport
ER,ME,NG,SY,MT
gi|6730518 gi|2554776 gi|30749651 gi|9836652 gi|14602585
P61769 11767 P08236 70870 P07686 58480 Q9HDC9 47887 P11586 102152
5.8 6.3 6.3 5.8 6.8
90 301 303 381 533
29 27 32 39 48
immunity hydrolase hydrolase biosynthesis multifunctional
EN,ME,PL LY,EX LY,ME,NG ME EN,ME,PL,MT
gi|4557014 gi|157833437 gi|4503143
P04040 P07858 P07339
59947 36000 45037
6.9 5.8 6.1
417 274 295
37 19 33
oxidoreductase hydrolase hydrolase
44 315
1 1
96 349 73 404 537 550 282 309 233 170 119 113 363 218 400 492
1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
501
1
614 91 224 236 53
2 1 1 1 1
166 422 437
1 1 1
100 kDa coactivator 26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 13 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase 60S acidic ribosomal protein P0 aconitate hydratase, mitochondrial actin related protein 2/3 complex subunit 2 actin related protein 2/3 complex subunit 3 actin related protein 2/3 complex subunit 5 actin, beta actin-related protein 2 actin-related protein 3 Adenosine deaminase CECR2 alpha-L-iduronidase alpha-mannosidase annexin A2 ATP synthase subunit alpha, mitochondrial ATP synthase subunit gamma ATP synthase, Hþ transporting, F0 complex, subunit B1 ATP synthase, Hþ transporting, F0 complex, subunit D beta-2-microglobulin beta-glucuronidase beta-hexosaminidase subunit beta BSCv protein C-1-tetrahydrofolate synthase, cytoplasmic catalase cathepsin B cathepsin D preproprotein
481
1
cathepsin S
gi|30749675
P25774
24491
7.6
369
47
hydrolase
ER,LY,EN,ME LY,ME,NG LY,ME,NG,EX, MT LY
532 465
1 1
cathepsin W chromosome 14 open reading frame 166
gi|119594869 gi|119586064
P56202 Q9Y224
30154 26652
8.6 6.7
76 392
36 62
hydrolase protein binding
LG ME,EN,ER,CY,NU
186
1
chromosome 22 open reading frame 28
gi|12652799
Q9Y3I0
55722
6.8
260
36
protein binding
EN,ME
544
1
cofilin-1
gi|5031635
P23528
18719
8.2
93
34
actin binding
ER,ME,EX,MT, NU
175
1
coronin, actin binding protein, 1A
gi|5902134
P31146
51678
6.3
203
26
actin binding
LY,PL
249
2
Cytochrome b-c1 complex subunit 1, mitochondrial
gi|515634
P31930
53270
5.9
693
57
electron transport
ME,PL,MT
466
1
Cytochrome b-c1 complex subunit 11
gi|45768728
P47985
29958
8.6
377
32
electron transport
ER,MT,ME
292
2
Cytochrome b-c1 complex subunit 2, mitochondrial
gi|50592988
P22695
48584
8.7
748
49
electron transport
ER,ME,MT
68 190 206 29 307 383 59 163 252 283 448 243 146 217
1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1
gi|4826686 gi|83753870 gi|15080291 gi|27574040 gi|7706495 gi|27597059 gi|56549121 gi|2529707 gi|39644794 gi|704416 gi|192987144 gi|203282367 gi|7657069 gi|4759034
Q92499 P09622 Q9UHL4 P27487 Q9UBS4 Q8WXX5 P50570 Q9H4M9 P26641 P49411 P30040 P06733 Q96HE7 P62495
83349 50656 54749 85008 40774 30062 98345 60722 50156 49851 27220 47350 55213 49228
6.8 6.5 5.9 5.7 5.8 5.6 7.0 6.5 6.3 7.7 7.1 7.0 5.5 5.5
401 485 185 344 446 477 98 454 302 621 158 592 356 248
37 51 18 15 40 42 16 39 29 53 28 69 32 22
protein binding oxidoreductase hydrolase hydrolase chaperone chaperone motor protein trafficking protein binding biosynthesis protein transport multifunctional oxidoreductase biosynthesis
ME ME,MT ME,LY,NG ER,LY,EN,ME,EX ER,ME,PL ME EN ER,LY,EN,EX,PL ME LY,ME,PL,MT ER,ME,PL ME,EX,SY,MT ME,ER ER,EN
57
1
DEAD (Asp-Glu-Ala-Asp) box polypeptide 1 dihydrolipoyl dehydrogenase, mitochondrial dipeptidyl peptidase 7 dipeptidyl peptidase IV (CD26) DnaJ homologue subfamily B member 11 DnaJ homologue, subfamily C, member 9 dynamin 2 EH-domain containing 1, isoform CRA_a elongation factor 1-gamma elongation factor Tu endoplasmic reticulum protein ERp29 enolase 1 ERO1-like [Homo sapiens] eukaryotic peptide chain release factor subunit 1 eukaryotic translation elongation factor 2
gi|4503483
P13639
96246
6.4
598
34
biosynthesis
ER,EN,ME,EX
1607
dx.doi.org/10.1021/pr100967v |J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10, 1603–1620
Journal of Proteome Research
ARTICLE
Table 1. Continued spot no. replicates
protein name
acc. no.
Uni-Prot no.
MW, Da
pI
% seq. MASCOT coverage
function
subcellular localization
88 348 397
1 1 1
ezrin F-actin-capping protein subunit alpha-1 F-actin-capping protein subunit beta
gi|46249758 gi|5453597 gi|119615295
P15311 P52907 P47756
69313 33057 30226
5.9 5.5 5.9
461 470 238
45 47 48
actin binding actin binding actin binding
ME,EX,MT ER,EN,ME ME,EX
521 242 322 270 144 472 443 370 314 49 215
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
gi|110591399 gi|5031699 gi|4557305 gi|119590499 gi|119584846 gi|178045 gi|178045 gi|4503987 gi|63252913 gi|119594451 gi|20151189
P02792 O75955 P04075 P07954 P16278 P63261 P63261 Q92820 P40121 Q14697 P00367
19933 47554 39851 46555 40868 26147 26147 36340 38760 104930 56315
5.5 7.1 8.3 6.9 8.8 5.7 5.7 6.7 5.8 5.9 6.7
226 577 331 301 148 389 467 365 237 376 641
32 65 42 33 22 38 51 28 15 31 66
transport protein binding Lyase lyase hydrolase trafficking trafficking hydrolase actin binding hydrolase oxidoreductase
ME,EX LY,ME,EX ME,EX,SY,MT EN,SY,MT LY,ME,EX ME,EX,PL,SY ME,EX,PL,SY LY,ME,NG,PL ME, NU ER,ME,PL ER,ME,PL,MT
350
1
gi|31645
P04406
36202
8.3
397
36
glycolysis
452 430 271
2 1 1
ferritin light chain flotillin 1 fructose-bisphosphate aldolase A fumarate hydratase, isoform CRA_d galactosidase, beta 1 gamma-actin gamma-actin gamma-glutamyl hydrolase precursor gelsolin-like capping protein glucosidase II subunit alpha glutamate dehydrogenase 1, mitochondrial glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase granzyme A granzyme B growth-inhibiting protein 1
gi|33357774 gi|13096242 gi|34452679
P12544 P10144 O14773
26328 25894 34670
9.1 9.6 5.7
604 119 464
70 18 27
cytolysis cytolysis protease
471 325
2 1
gi|5107637 gi|119585458
P62826 P04899
24519 20295
7.0 5.5
493 305
47 80
transport signal transduction
LY,ME,NG,EX, PL,SY,MT LG LG LY,ME,NG, PL,MT ME,EX EX
366
1
gi|306785
P62879
38061
5.8
382
32
signal transduction
EN,ME,EX,SY,MT
256 90 108
1 1 1
gi|219588 gi|16507237 gi|5729877
P31689 P11021 P11142
45590 72402 71082
6.7 5.1 5.4
512 692 504
44 48 38
chaperone chaperone chaperone
106 40 64 610 316 126 27
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
gi|24234688 gi|15010550 gi|119602173 gi|9256890 gi|460771 gi|24308207 gi|31621305
P38646 73890 P14625 90309 P07900 57868 P69905 30476 Q15365 38015 Q8N1G4 64004 P42704 159060
6.0 4.7 4.9 8.9 6.7 8.6 5.8
466 325 169 157 307 114 118
33 26 14 28 47 18 7
chaperone chaperone chaperone transport DNA/RNA binding protein binding transport
ER,ME ER,ME,EX,PL,MT LY,ME,NG,EX, PL,SY,MT ME,EX,PL,SY,MT ER,ME,PL ME,NG,MT SY,ER,MT ME,NU,CY ME ME,MT
376 280 98 192 39 371 296 313
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
gi|62897717 gi|13111975 gi|114159823 gi|4826940 gi|1097308 gi|49168580 gi|20987224 gi|17834080
P00338 P11117 P10253 P42785 Q14764 P40925 P53582 O96008
36951 48685 106142 56263 100135 35993 30919 33904
7.6 6.1 5.6 6.8 5.3 8.9 6.2 6.8
274 106 126 101 365 880 212 229
31 15 9 15 26 69 32 27
metabolism degradation hydrolase degradation protein transport oxidoreductase hydrolase ion transport
ME,EX,SY LY,ME LY,NG,EX LY,ME,NG ME ME,EX,PL,SY,MT EN MT,ME
74 311 605
1 1 1
gi|516764 gi|23879 gi|11496277
Q16891 P28482 Q9UHA4
9830 40794 13671
5.7 6.7 6.7
463 143 68
25 37 30
protein binding signal transduction protein binding
ME,MT ME,PL LY
94 62 601
1 1 1
gi|119625804 gi|12667788 gi|189011548
P26038 P35579 Q13510
66678 227646 45087
5.9 5.5 7.5
677 481 86
44 14 11
structure motor protein hydrolase
EN,ME,EX,PL,MT EN,ME,EX,PL,MT LY
500
1
gi|4758774
O96000
21048
8.7
148
51
electron transport
MT,ME
455
1
gi|4758788
O75489
30337
7.0
623
53
electron transport
ER,MT,ME
95
1
gi|21411235
P28331
80415
5.8
582
45
electron transport
ER,ME,MT
102 554 360 426
1 1 1 1
gi|10257494 gi|66392203 gi|8923427 gi|4506031
P46459 P22392 Q9NX40 P50897
83113 30346 27780 34627
6.4 9.1 7.0 6.1
293 107 249 522
23 35 34 29
protein transport metabolism unknown degradation
EN,ME,SY ER,ME,SY,MT EN LY,ME,NG
GTP-binding nuclear protein Ran guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(i), alpha-2 subunit guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(I)/G(S)/G(T) subunit beta-2 heat shock 40 kDa protein 4 heat shock 70 kDa protein 5 heat shock 70 kDa protein 8 isoform 1 heat shock 70 kDa protein 9 heat shock protein 90 kDa beta member 1 heat shock protein HSP 90-alpha hemoglobin subunit alpha hnRNP-E1 leucine rich repeat containing 47 leucine-rich PPR motif-containing protein L-lactate dehydrogenase lysosomal acid phosphatase lysosomal alpha-glucosidase lysosomal Pro-X carboxypeptidase Major Vault Protein malate dehydrogenase methionyl aminopeptidase 1 mitochondrial import receptor subunit TOM40 homologue mitochondrial inner membrane protein mitogen-activated protein kinase 1 mitogen-activated protein kinase scaffold protein 1 moesin myosin 9 N-acylsphingosine amidohydrolase 1 isoform a preproprotein NADH dehydrogenase (ubiquinone) 1 beta subcomplex, 10, 22 kDa NADH dehydrogenase (ubiquinone) Fe-S protein 3, 30 kDa (NADH-coenzyme Q reductase) [Homo sapiens] NADH-ubiquinone oxidoreductase 75 kDa subunit, mitochondrial N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor NME1-NME2 protein OCIA domain-containing protein 1 palmitoyl-protein thioesterase 1
1608
dx.doi.org/10.1021/pr100967v |J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10, 1603–1620
Journal of Proteome Research
ARTICLE
Table 1. Continued spot no. replicates
protein name
acc. no.
Uni-Prot no.
MW, Da
pI
% seq. MASCOT coverage
subcellular localization
function
566 541 136 504
1 1 1 1
peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase A peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase B perforin-1 peroxiredoxin 1
gi|1633054 gi|1310882 gi|40254808 gi|55959887
P62937 P23284 P14222 Q06830
18098 19705 62479 19135
7.8 9.2 8.1 6.4
287 104 67 336
68 36 7 49
isomerase isomerase cytolysis oxidoreductase
496
1
peroxiredoxin 2
gi|1617118
P32119
18486
5.2
69
35
oxidoreductase
489 117 453 590 135 251 168
1 1 1 2 1 1 1
peroxiredoxin 3 phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase beta chain phosphoglycerate mutase 1 profilin-1 programmed cell death 8 isoform 2 proliferation-associated protein 2G4 prolyl 4-hydroxylase, beta subunit
gi|119569783 gi|7768938 gi|38566176 gi|157838211 gi|22202629 gi|4099506 gi|20070125
P30048 Q9NSD9 P18669 P07737 O95831 Q9UQ80 P07237
21158 66757 28916 15068 66539 38321 57480
6.1 6.4 6.7 8.4 9.0 7.2 4.8
117 187 102 216 180 225 360
38 20 30 44 24 17 27
oxidoreductase biosynthesis hydrolase actin binding apoptosis signal transduction chaperone
228 183
1 1
protein disulfide isomerase-related protein 5 gi|1710248 protein disulfide-isomerase A3 gi|860986
Q14554 P30101
46512 57043
5.0 6.1
676 439
57 44
oxidoreductase isomerase
343
1
gi|4506005
P62140
37961
5.8
235
20
phosohatase
272 173 83 82 302 259 99 342
1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1
gi|215261382 gi|67464392 gi|22477159 gi|13529299 gi|157835884 gi|78057661 gi|14530105 gi|4506003
P08559 P14618 Q15436 Q15437 Q15019 Q8TC62 Q9UHD8 P62136
43164 60277 87022 87377 36418 48913 64894 38229
6.9 8.2 6.6 6.4 6.3 8.8 7.2 5.9
293 485 401 287 505 494 329 312
25 42 27 20 51 34 31 37
oxidoreductase glycolysis transport transport cell division cell division cell division multifunctional
SY,MT ME,EX,SY ME,ER,PL EN ME,EX,SY ME,PL,SY ME EX
615 194
1 1
gi|189017 gi|14043738
Q15746 Q9Y512
11753 52270
4.5 6.6
103 350
30 51
cell motility transport
ME ME,EX,MT
305 540 229
1 1 1
protein phosphatase 1, catalytic subunit, beta isoform 1 pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 pyruvate kinase SEC23A protein SEC23B protein septin 2 septin 7 septin 9 serine/threonine-protein phosphatase PP1-alpha catalytic subunit smooth muscle myosin light chain sorting and assembly machinery component 50 homologue stomatin-like protein 2 superoxide dismutase [Cu-Zn] talin 1
ME,EX,MT ER,ME LG ER,LY,EN,ME, NG,PL,MT ER,EN,ME, SY,MT ME,PL,MT EN,ME ME,EX,SY ME,EX,PL,MT MT,ER,ME ME,EN,ER ER,ME,EX, PL,MT ME,ER,PL ER,LY,ME, NG,EX,PL ME,PL
gi|2984585 gi|31615966 gi|55859707
Q9UJZ1 38839 P00441 16001 Q5TCU6 260030
6.4 5.7 6.1
418 112 163
49 45 4
ME,MT ME,EX,MT EN,ME,PL
158 153 385 254 132 539
1 1 1 1 1 2
gi|36796 gi|119628379 gi|18088455 gi|193885198 gi|388891 gi|5454090
P17987 P40227 Q15006 Q9BS26 P29401 P51571
60869 39434 34955 44284 68528 19158
6.0 6.7 6.2 5.0 7.9 5.8
159 300 115 357 486 190
19 36 31 31 34 38
467 191 178 389
1 1 1 1
T-complex protein 1 subunit alpha T-complex protein 1 subunit zeta tetratricopeptide repeat protein 35 thioredoxin domain-containing protein 4 transketolase translocon-associated protein subunit delta triosephosphate isomerase 1 tubulin beta vimentin voltage-dependent anion channel 1
receptor binding oxidoreductase cytoskeleton anchoring chaperone chaperone unknown chaperone ligase protein transport
gi|17389815 gi|18088719 gi|47115317 gi|4507879
P60174 P07437 P08670 P21796
26910 50096 53604 30868
6.5 4.8 5.1 8.6
87 467 770 794
18 51 70 80
biosynthesis microtuble movement movement channel
434
1
gi|25188179
Q9Y277
30981
8.9
296
49
channel
390
1
gi|48146045
P45880
30849
6.8
320
46
channel
SY,MT
199 201 332 405 402
1 1 1 1 1
gi|13938355 gi|522193 gi|542837 gi|87159816 gi|119574080
P21281 P21281 P61421 A8MUE4 P63244
55708 56792 32083 23630 30942
5.4 5.6 5.2 9.0 7.0
295 479 140 117 283
31 52 29 26 33
ion transport ion transport ion transport ion transport signal transduction
LY,ME,NG,SY LY,ME,NG,SY LY,EN,ME,SY LY ER
384 335
1 1
gi|24307901 gi|219842325
P80217 Q15555
31896 32444
5.8 5.3
227 106
25 27
immunity signal transduction
PL PL
198
1
voltage-dependent anion channel 3 isoform b voltage-dependent anion-selective channel protein 2 V-type proton ATPase subunit B2 V-type proton ATPase subunit B2 V-type proton ATPase subunit D1 V-type proton ATPase subunit E1 guanine nucleotide-binding protein subunit beta-2-like 1 interferon-induced protein 35 microtubule-associated protein RP/EB family member 2 tubulin alpha
ME,EX,SY,MT ME,PL,SY ME ER,LY,ME,NG, EX,PL,SY,MT ME,EN,MT
gi|340021
P68363
50804
4.9
524
46
PL
506
1
actin beta variant
gi|62897625
Q53G99
42080
5.4
128
13
230 124 122
1 1 1
Enah/Vasp-like L-plastin L-plastin variant
gi|7706687 gi|167614506 gi|62898171
Q9UI08 P13796 Q53FI1
44878 70814 70785
8.9 5.3 5.2
231 373 159
31 26 15
microtuble movement cytoskeleton movement actin binding calcium binding ion binding
1609
ER,EN,ME,EX ME,EX,PL ME,ER,NU ER,ME,PL EN,ME ER,ME
CY CY CY CY
dx.doi.org/10.1021/pr100967v |J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10, 1603–1620
Journal of Proteome Research
ARTICLE
Table 1. Continued spot no. replicates 301
1
148 240
1 1
143
1
97 31 115
1 1 1
77 321 291 464 573 571 189
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
130 416 121
2 1 1
331
1
474 418
1 1
295 294
1 1
328
1
151
1
86 462
1 1
219 250 287 592 458
1 1 1 1 1
412
1
225 159 408
1 1 1
155
1
454 460 493 164 37 290
1 1 1 1 1 1
461 177
1 1
299 145
1 1
330
1
protein name
acc. no.
Uni-Prot no.
MW, Da
pI
% seq. MASCOT coverage
subcellular localization
function
serine (or cysteine) proteinase inhibitor, clade B, member 1 T-complex protein 1 subunit gamma tubulin gamma 1
gi|13489087
P30740
42857
5.9
531
34
inhibitor
CY
gi|671527 gi|31543831
P49368 P23258
60862 51480
6.2 5.8
203 291
21 31
CY CY
tyrosine-protein phosphatase nonreceptor type 6 dead box, X isoform DNA damage-binding protein 1 ubiquitin associated and SH3 domain-containing protein A ATP-dependent DNA helicase 2 budding uninhibited by benzimidazoles 3 flap endonuclease 1 high-mobility group box 2 histone cluster 1, H2bm histone H2B type 2-E PRP19/PSO4 pre-mRNA processing factor 19 homologue replication protein A1, 70 kDa replication protein A2, 32 kDa alkyldihydroxyacetone phosphate synthase precursor 28S ribosomal protein S22, mitochondrial 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase type-2 3-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase, type 1 [Homo sapiens] 3-ketoacyl-CoA thiolase, mitochondrial acyl-CoA dehydrogenase, mitochondrial, medium chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase, mitochondrial, short chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase, mitochondrial, very long chain acyl-CoA synthetase adenylate kinase isoenzyme 4, mitochondrial ATP synthase subunit beta coenzyme Q6 homologue isoform b CS protein [Homo sapiens] cytochrome c oxidase subunit Vb cytochrome oxidase deficient homologue 2 delta(3,5)-Delta(2,4)-dienoyl-CoA isomerase, mitochondrial dihydrolipoamide succinyltransferase DnaJ homologue subfamily C member 11 electron transfer flavoprotein, alpha polypeptide electron transfer flavoprotein-ubiquinone oxidoreductase, mitochondrial enoyl-CoA hydratase ETHE1 protein, mitochondrial glutathione S-transferase kappa 1 heat shock 60 kDa protein 1 variant 1 hexokinase-1 isocitrate dehydrogenase [NADP], mitochondrial metaxin-2 methylcrotonoyl-CoA carboxylase beta chain, mitochondrial mitochondrial ribosomal protein L38 NAD-dependent malic enzyme, mitochondrial NADH dehydrogenase (ubiquinone) 1 alpha subcomplex, 10, 42 kDa precursor [Homo sapiens]
gi|82407989
P29350
60638
6.1
128
12
chaperone microtuble movement hydrolase
gi|2580550 gi|2632123 gi|49640014
O00571 Q16531 P57075
73625 128086 70943
6.7 5.1 6.6
85 90 188
13 12 29
hydrolase protein binding degradation
CY,NU CY,NU CY,NU
gi|10863945 gi|4757880 gi|61680058 gi|11321591 gi|45767717 gi|184086 gi|7657381
P13010 O43684 P39748 P26583 Q99879 Q16778 Q9UMS4
83222 5.6 37587 6.4 42777 8.8 24190 7.6 14080 10.4 11324 10.1 55603 6.1
426 241 166 214 70 77 253
40 38 13 48 50 57 25
DNA binding protein binding hydrolase DNA binding DNA binding DNA binding DNA binding
NU NU NU NU NU NU NU
gi|4506583 gi|4506585 gi|4501993
P27694 P15927 O00116
68723 29342 73664
6.9 5.8 7.0
363 162 302
33 12 25
DNA binding DNA binding biosynthesis
NU NU PE
gi|119599451
P82650
36840
6.3
236
41
protein binding
MT
gi|55670219 gi|15080429
Q99714 Q02338
27130 38516
8.5 9.1
144 182
41 31
oxidoreductase oxidoreductase
MT ER,MT
gi|509676 gi|4557231
P42765 P11310
42469 47015
8.5 8.6
426 286
39 26
metabolism metabolism
MT,ER MT
gi|4557233
P16219
44611
8.1
106
13
metabolism
MT
gi|119610656
B3KPA6
62941
6.8
374
33
metabolism
MT
gi|4758332 gi|83754030
O60488 P27144
75471 28030
8.3 7.3
194 127
21 26
metabolism Kinase
MT,PE,ME EN,MT
gi|89574029 gi|32967307 gi|48257138 gi|119622335 gi|153791313
Q0QEN7 Q9Y2Z9 O75390 P10606 O43819
48083 5.0 43389 6.9 45758 6.5 19755 10.0 29962 9.0
688 130 434 130 106
69 18 28 28 19
ion transport oxidoreductase transferase electron transport redox protein
MT MT MT,PL ER,MT MT
gi|183448176
Q13011
33061
6.4
474
38
isomerase
MT
gi|736677 gi|37732147 gi|189181759
P36957 Q9NVH1 Q53XN3
48992 59138 30235
9.0 7.2 8.8
284 88 76
33 14 13
transferase chaperone electron transport
MT MT MT
gi|31874555
Q16134
65502
6.9
380
24
electron transport
MT
gi|1922287 gi|41327741 gi|33150564 gi|189502784 gi|188497750 gi|119622488
P30084 O95571 Q9Y2Q3 B3GQS7 P19367 P48735
31807 28368 25580 60813 102161 48071
8.3 6.4 8.5 5.8 6.5 8.3
281 124 192 380 147 546
20 25 35 42 11 57
lyase hydrolase transferase chaperone glycolysis metabolism
MT MT,CY,NU MT,ME,PL MT PL,MT PL,MT
gi|62702262 gi|11545863
O75431 Q9HCC0
28668 61808
6.1 7.6
67 290
12 40
protein transport ligase
MT MT
gi|169636418 gi|31615313
Q96DV4 P23368
44968 62563
7.2 6.4
364 170
45 14
unknown oxidoreductase
MT PL,MT
gi|4758768
O95299
41067
8.7
405
45
electron transport
MT
1610
CY
dx.doi.org/10.1021/pr100967v |J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10, 1603–1620
Journal of Proteome Research
ARTICLE
Table 1. Continued spot no. replicates 574
1
232
1
278
1
46
1
577
1
277
1
138
2
293
1
262
1
388 111
1 1
18 583 234
1 1 1
226
1
235 341
1 1
414
1
107
1
125 339
1 1
69 110 491
1 1 1
312 526
1 1
93 484 188 424 508 104 212 432 196
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
334 131 109
1 1 1
protein name NADH dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] 1 alpha subcomplex subunit 13 NADH dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] flavoprotein 1, mitochondrial NADH dehydrogenase-ubiquinone Fe-S protein 2 precursor [Homo sapiens] oxoglutarate (alpha-ketoglutarate) dehydrogenase isoform 1 single-stranded DNA-binding protein, mitochondrial solute carrier family 25 member 24 isoform 1 succinate dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] flavoprotein subunit, mitochondrial succinyl-CoA ligase [ADP-forming] subunit beta, mitochondrial sulfide:quinone oxidoreductase, mitochondrial thiosulfate sulfurtransferase trifunctional enzyme subunit alpha, mitochondrial 150 kDa oxygen-regulated protein ACTG1 protein ARP3 actin-related protein 3 homologue variant calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type II delta chain DNA FLJ78579, highly similar to CSK erythrocyte 26 S protease subunit 12, 26 S hCG2016179, isoform CRA_d [Homo sapiens] heat shock 70 kDa protein 8 isoform 2 variant hypothetical protein SBBI88 isocitrate dehydrogenase 3 (NADþ) alpha KLRAQ motif containing 1 isoform 3 KU antigen loss of heterozygosity 12 chromosomal region 1 protein migration-inducing gene 14 myosin regulatory light chain MRCL3 variant NADH-ubiquinone oxidoreductase NDUFV2 protein OXCT protein PHB protein phorbolin I protein protein disulfide isomerase septin 6 SH3-domain binding protein 1 tubulin alpha 6 variant unnamed protein product unnamed protein product X-ray repair complementing defective repair in Chinese hamster cells 6 (Ku autoantigen, 70 kDa)
Uni-Prot no.
MW, Da
pI
gi|4680717
Q9P0J0
15729
6.9
148
34
electron transport
MT
gi|119595060
P49821
50707
8.5
257
33
electron transport
MT
gi|3540239
O75306
52869
7.2
327
39
electron transport
MT
gi|51873036
Q02218
117059
6.4
425
25
glycolysis
MT
gi|2624694
Q04837
15186
8.2
264
65
DNA binding
MT,PL
gi|148491091
Q6NUK1
53548
6.0
385
41
ion transport
MT
gi|156416003
P31040
73672
7.1
533
45
oxidoreducatse
ER,MT
gi|55957259
Q9P2R7
48351
6.6
189
14
protein binding
MT
gi|10864011
Q9Y6N5
50214
9.2
579
56
oxidoreductase
MT
gi|48146113 gi|20127408
Q16762 P40939
33622 83688
6.8 9.2
119 434
29 35
transferase oxidoreductase
PL,MT PL,MT
gi|193785329 gi|40225338 gi|62088286
B3KXH0 Q96FU6 Q59FV6
110601 18724 42517
5.2 5.2 5.6
350 241 258
15 38 31
unknown unknown unknown
gi|119626702
Q13557
59062
7.0
243
15
ATP binding trafficking cytoskeleton movement kinase
gi|158254494 gi|998688
A8K3B6 unknown
51240 36674
6.6 6.2
284 398
27 47
protein binding degradation
unknown unknown
gi|119617243
A5YM67
21868
5.9
132
27
chaperone
unknown
gi|62896815
Q53HF2
53580
5.6
150
22
chaperone
unknown
gi|6942315 gi|62897507
Q9Y3Z3 Q53GF8
72839 40050
6.6 6.5
366 173
36 11
hydrolase oxidoreductase
unknown unknown
gi|208431757 gi|189055002 gi|119616665
Q6ZMI0 B2RDN9 Q969J3
83659 70026 13442
6.2 6.3 6.3
109 101 84
12 9 48
unknown DNA binding unknown
unknown unknown unknown
gi|38570361 gi|62896697
Q5J8M4 Q53HL1
40080 19838
8.0 4.7
72 113
19 36
unknown cell motility
unknown unknown
gi|194373941 gi|48145973 gi|48146215 gi|49456373 gi|9294747 gi|158255378 gi|1469179 gi|85815829 gi|62897609
B4DUC1 Q6IB76 Q6IAV5 Q6FHP5 Q9NRW3 A8K4K6 Q14141 Q9Y3L3 Q53GA7
74393 27617 56612 29871 34310 73157 48911 76008 50476
5.6 8.2 7.1 5.6 5.5 5.0 6.4 6.3 5.0
286 198 128 314 164 163 340 156 107
37 48 14 50 19 17 44 6 17
unknown unknown unknown unknown unknown unknown unknown unknown unknown
gi|158256528 gi|194382854 gi|169145198
A8K683 B4DJX1 B1AHC7
35187 63057 64263
5.2 5.5 6.4
73 222 510
14 24 45
unknown oxidoreductase unknown unknown hydrolase isomerase cell division transport microtuble movement unknown protein binding unknown
acc. no.
% seq. MASCOT coverage
subcellular localization
function
unknown
unknown unknown unknown
a
A total of 240 individual proteins of 379 identified spots (see Supplemental Table S1, Supporting Information, and individual data sets) are listed. Proteins are alphabetically sorted according to their subcellular localization, starting with lysosomal-related organelles. The table lists the spot number with the number of iterant identifications, the respective accession number of the proteins in NCBI and Uni-Prot, the theoretical molecular weight (MW) and isoelectric point (pI). The resulting total MASCOT score and sequence coverage as well as the assigned protein function, and subcellular localization of the respective protein are given. Abbreviations: LY, lysosomes; ME, melanosomes; PL, platelet granules; SY, synaptosomes; EX, exosomes; CG, cytotoxic granules; NG, neuromelanin granules; EN, endosomes; MT, mitochondria; GO, Golgi; PE, peroxisomes; CY, cytoplasm; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; NU, nucleus. 1611
dx.doi.org/10.1021/pr100967v |J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10, 1603–1620
Journal of Proteome Research
ARTICLE
and 23 spots were more abundant in the fraction 6 samples with a t test value of e0.05. Importantly, 105 of the 120 differential spots were identified based on the previously established spot maps (Table 3). Verification of Fraction-Specific Proteins
Figure 5. Subcellular distribution of the identified proteins. A total of 240 individual proteins were identified and grouped according to their subcellular localization based on available database entries. Abbreviations are used as in Table 1.
with lysosomal or secretory compartments based on previous studies.14 This percentage is in the same order of magnitude as the numbers we reported for fraction 2 vesicles from NK cells or T cell blasts and indicates that fraction 2 and fraction 6 vesicles might indeed represent two separate lysosomal compartments. Notably, in fraction 6 vesicles, we found significant amounts of granzymes A and B, perforin and several lysosomal hydrolases including the cathepsins B, D, S and W. The proteome map of fraction 6 organelles is depicted in Figure 4. For a better visualization of individual annotated spots, enlarged quadrants are displayed in supplemental Figure S6A-D (Supporting Information). A short list of identified proteins, ordered alphabetically according to their predicted organelle localization is given in Table 1. In addition, the predicted organelle association is summarized as a pie chart in Figure 5. The complete list of proteins including relevant data of the mass spectrometric identification is provided as Supplemental Table S1 (Supporting Information). Individual data sets for each spot are also given in the Supporting Information. Direct Comparison of Fraction 2 and Fraction 6 Vesicles
To directly compare the protein content of the two putative effector organelles, we subjected equal amounts of the two fractions obtained from PHA-stimulated T lymphocytes of four different donors to 2D-DIGE analyses (Table 2). As an example, one biological replicate is displayed in Figure 6 where fraction 2 proteins were labeled with Cy5 and fraction 6 proteins with Cy3. From the overlay picture (Figure 6A) and also from the representation of the individual scans (Figure 6B,C), major differences in the overall spot distribution became immediately apparent. This was seen in all biological replicates (Figure S2, Supporting Information). The software-based analysis of the in-gel differences (DIA) resulted in a calculated 2-fold square deviation of 1.61 when comparing fraction 2 samples from two different donors (Figure 7A). In contrast, applying the same calculation for the comparison of fraction 2 and 6 from the same donor, the 2-fold square deviation was 6.59 (Figure 7B). Accordingly, setting the threshold of the volume ratio to 6 resulted in a similarity of 100% comparing individual fraction 2 lysates whereas only 78.9% of the included spots (=proteins) were comparably abundant in fractions 2 and 6. These major differences in the overall protein composition were confirmed by the biological variance analysis listed in Table 2. Considering donor and gel specific variations, the number of spots included in the analysis was reduced to 801. Applying a threshold of 5.5, 97 of 801 spots were underrepresented
Selected examples of the differentially distributed proteins are shown in Figure 8. Some proteins were present in only one of the two compared fractions. These included β-actin, dipeptidylpeptidase IV (DPP4), moesin and cathepsin D in fraction 2, and granzymes A and B, myosin IIA and dynamin II in fraction 6. In addition to the proteins listed in Table 3, we verified further differences in potentially functionally relevant proteins that were not included in the table because of a high t test value or a lower volume ratio (Figure S3, Supporting Information). Among them are Nck and WASp, two proteins enriched in fraction 2 (Figure S4A, Supporting Information) and involved in the transport of FasL.13,19 Regarding fraction 6, we confirmed our previous Western blot analyses10 indicating that granzyme A and granzyme B were much more abundant in these vesicles (see 3D representation in Figure 8C). Note that we did not include granzymes A and B in Table 3 because of high t test values due to differences in the resolution in the basic parts of the IPG strips. However, also the direct comparison of the two fractions from T cell blasts of two individuals by Western blot analysis clearly showed the differences between fraction 2 and 6 (Figure 8D). Since flotilin-1 spot volumes were comparable between the fractions, it was used as an internal loading control (Figure S3C, Supporting Information). More examples for differentially abundant proteins are displayed in supplemental Figure S3A,B, Supporting Information. Interestingly, major differences were especially noted for cytoskeletal or cytoskeleton-regulating proteins. Thus, β-actin, actinin alpha 4 and coronin-1A were more abundant in fraction 2 isolates, whereas γ-actin, myosin light chain kinase and myosin IIA (myosin 9) were associated with fraction 6. For myosin IIA, a detailed description of the biological variance analysis is given in the Supporting Information, once more stressing the high reproducibility of the performed organelle fractionation and protein separation when comparing samples from different donors (Figure S5, Supporting Information).
’ DISCUSSION The maturation-dependent storage of FasL as a transmembrane component of secretory lysosomes is a commonly accepted feature of fully differentiated cytotoxic immune effector cells. Upon exposure to target cells, the availability of prestored FasL allows its rapid surface appearance at the immunological synapse. This is reflected by a biphasic kinetics of activationinduced FasL expression, with an actin-dependent phase 1 expression within minutes and a protein-biosynthesis-dependent phase 2 expression after hours.5,6 However, effective target cell lysis does not only rely on the membrane appearance of FasL, but rather depends on a concerted action of FasL with a number of secreted proteins including granzymes, perforin and granulysin. Interestingly, although earlier studies suggested a common lysosomal storage compartment for all effector proteins,3,4,18,20 more detailed analyses on the signal requirements for mobilization of effector proteins recently indicated the coexistence of separate compartments for FasL and factors associated with degranulation.7,8 1612
dx.doi.org/10.1021/pr100967v |J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10, 1603–1620
Journal of Proteome Research
ARTICLE
Table 2. Overview of DIGE Experiments Performed to Directly Compare Fraction (F) 2 and 6 Vesicles from T Lymphoblasts of Four Different Donorsa included spots gel #
Cy5 labeling
Cy3 labeling
#
increased in fraction 6 2 S.D.
#
%
decreased in fraction 6 #
%
1
donor I F2
donor I F6
1340
6.9
255
19.0
59
4.4
2
donor II F2
donor II F6
1122
5.2
42
3.7
110
9.8
3 4
donor III F6 donor IV F6
donor III F2 donor IV F2
1487 1207
3.9 6.6
36 129
2.4 10.7
56 125
3.8 10.4
average:
1289
5.6
116
9.0
88
6.8
included in BVAb:
801
23
97
a
The 2-fold square deviation (2 S.D.) indicates the difference between the compared fractions. The numbers of increased and decreased spots refer to a spot volume threshold of 5.5. b Biological variance analysis (BVA) was performed with all gels, only spot present in at least three donors were included. The number of regulated spots is based on a volume ratio change of 5.5 and a t test of e0.05.
Figure 6. 2D-DIGE analysis of fraction 2 and 6 isolates. Proteins of fraction 2 and 6 organelles were labeled with Cy5 (red) and Cy3 (green), respectively. The samples were separated by two-dimensional electrophoresis as described in the Material and Methods section. Images of individual fluorescence channels are displayed for fraction 2 in (B) and for fraction 6 in (C). Spots with higher abundance in fraction 6 are circled in blue and with lower abundance circled in red.
At the resolution of microscopic inspection and confocal imaging, we and others reported a colocalization of FasL with lysosomal markers such as CD63, LAMP-1 (CD107), cathepsin D and also with granzymes and perforin.3,4,13,18 However, this has been challenged by the work of He et al.6 and Kassahn and colleagues.8 Using a murine CD8þ T cell clone and employing similar hardware but additional deconvolution software and 3D imaging to presumably render more precise images, He and
colleagues in fact suggested the existence of two types of storage granules for FasL and for granzymes, respectively.6 Nevertheless, although deconvolution might slightly enhance the resolution compared to standard confocal laser scanning microscopy, most previous reports by Griffiths and colleagues1-4 and our own observations suggested to a colocalization or at least a very close proximity of the effector compartments in most analyzed T and NK cell populations. Since it seems unlikely that distinct granules 1613
dx.doi.org/10.1021/pr100967v |J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10, 1603–1620
Journal of Proteome Research
ARTICLE
Figure 7. Statistical representation of the overall protein distribution (A) in fraction 2 extracts of T cell blasts from two donors and (B) in fraction 2 and 6 extracts from one individual. The red line indicates the number of spots with a specific abundance ratio (log scale). The blue line represents the calculated Gaussian distribution. Red dots represent decreased and blue increased protein volumes in individual spot locations of fraction 6. The threshold in both analyses was set to 5.5 (vertical lines).
occupy closely adjacent cytosolic areas by chance, a more sound explanation for the apparent discrepancy might be that the differentially loaded effector granules are at least partially stored in a common multivesicular compartment. However, we have to admit that we so far failed to convincingly document this multivesicular compartment in fixed T cell blasts by electron microscopy using a set of presumably granule-specific antibodies and immunogold labeling. Another caveat to the interpretation of confocal images regarding colocalization might be that the cells/ areas were somehow “selected for colocalization”. In our own studies, we noted that protein distribution and localization is not homogeneous in all cells of a given (even clonal) population, with some cells displaying a more intense FasL and others a brighter granzyme/perforin staining. Thus, the composition of the effector vesicle compartment might be subject to change due to activation or nutritional parameters. A coexistence of two separate effector compartments becomes very likely considering the data obtained in the present study. After density gradient centrifugation and Western blot analysis, the marker proteins clearly segregate in different fractions. While FasL and CD63 are enriched in fraction 2, granzyme B and the active form of granulysin are present in fraction 6 (Figure 2). As visualized by electron microscopy, vesicles in individual fractions are quite homogeneous. However, fraction 2 vesicles are mostly larger and less electron dense than fraction 6 vesicles. Notably, organelles resembling multivesicular bodies were only seen in fraction 2 (Figure 3A, S1A). Interestingly, only fraction 6 vesicles contained a less electron dense structure that suggested polarity and therefore was reminiscent of a
earlier description of an electron-translucent space of unknown nature in cytolytic granules of decidual γδ T cells.21 The localization of granzymes A and B in electron dense structures could be in agreement with their reported tight packaging in multimolecular complexes associated with chondroitin-sulfate proteoglycans of the serglycin type.22 In this context, it was shown earlier that such complexes are delivered by exocytosis to induce apoptosis in target cells.23 Granulysin is a cationic member of the family of saposin-like proteins (SAPLIPs) and as such interacts with lipids.24 Western blot analyses revealed that granulysin is detected as a 15 kDa form in fraction 2 vesicles, whereas a 9 kDa form is seen on the same blot in fraction 6. The processing of the proform to the active smaller form25 requires posttranslational modifications of both the N-terminus and the C-terminus in an acidic environment26 and only the active 9 kDa form is able to lyse bacteria and fungi.27,28 It has been reported that in certain situations, the lytic activity of granulysin can be enhanced by perforin.29 In this context, it makes sense that also perforin was present in significantly higher amounts in fraction 6 vesicles (Figure S4C, Supporting Information). For the detection of perforin, we used a recently established antibody (clone B-D48) which supposedly reacts with multiple forms of the protein while the classical mAb (clone deltaG9) only recognizes the granule-associated conformation.30 Interestingly, higher molecular weight bands at approximately 65 and 70 kDa were only detected in fraction 2, whereas high amounts of the presumably C-terminally processed 60 kDa form of perforin were predominant in fraction 6.31 1614
dx.doi.org/10.1021/pr100967v |J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10, 1603–1620
Journal of Proteome Research
ARTICLE
Table 3. List of Differentially Abundant Protein Spots in Fraction 2 and 6 Vesiclesa BVA spot
protein ID
protein ID
no.
fraction 2
fraction 6
average volume protein name
acc. no.
t test value
ratio
1406
841
coactosin-like protein
gi|56966036
6.3 10-5
-22.2
1384
820
stathmin 1/oncoprotein 18
gi|122890670
2.2 10-4
-21.4
1271
728
Rho GDP dissociation inhibitor (GDI) beta
gi|56676393
2.1 10-5
-21.0
1465
nd
7.2 10-5
-20.9
241
143
actinin; alpha 4
gi|12025678
1.2 10-6
-18.4
953
522
ACTB protein
gi|15277503
7.6 10-8
-17.4
39 966
15 508
coronin; actin binding protein; 1A ACTB protein
gi|5902134 gi|15277503
5.4 10-4 5.5 10-8
-17.4 -17.2
633
371
coronin; actin binding protein; 1A
gi|5902134
6.3 10-6
-17.1
936
508
ACTB Protein
gi|15277503
2.2 10-5
-16.9
890
485
ACTB protein
gi|15277503
3.3 10-3
-16.3
940
522
ACTB protein
gi|15277503
1.3 10-7
-16.2
935
525
ACTB protein
gi|15277503
2.0 10-2
-15.8
955
508
ACTB protein
gi|15277503
3.7 10-7
-15.6
1251 508
nd 266
not identified L-plastin
gi|4504965
5.4 10-5 2.1 10-5
-15.3 -14.6
238
140
actinin; alpha 4
gi|12025678
2.0 10-7
-14.4
939
526
ACTB protein
gi|15277503
3.0 10-6
-14.1
1265
nd
not identified
1.2 10-3
-14.1
1279
742
triosephosphate isomerase 1
gi|4507645
4.5 10-6
-14.1
1178
676
tropomyosin 3 isoform 2
gi|24119203
1.8 10-5
-13.8
636
372
coronin; actin binding protein; 1A
gi|5902134
9.2 10-6
-13.3
497 931
267 527
L-plastin
variant ACTB protein
gi|62898171 gi|15277503
6.7 10-6 5.9 10-5
-13.3 -13.0
937
522
ACTB protein
gi|15277503
6.2 10-3
-12.8
686
397
adenylyl cyclase-associated protein variant
gi|62896585
6.3 10-5
-12.6
509
275
L-plastin
gi|4504965
3.0 10-2
-12.4
1379
810
cofilin 1
gi|5031635
3.0 10-3
-12.3
942
525
ACTB protein
gi|15277503
5.3 10-6
-11.7
516
299
WD repeat-containing protein 1 isoform 1 variant
gi|62897087
1.4 10-4
-11.2
506 34
275 8
L-plastin
coronin; actin binding protein; 1A
gi|4504965 gi|1002923
7.8 10-3 9.8 10-6
-11.0 -10.8
684
404
adenylyl cyclase-associated protein variant
gi|62896585
2.3 10-5
-10.4
803
960
lymphocyte-specific protein 1
gi|10880979
2.2 10-4
-10.4
121
49
coronin; actin binding protein; 1A
gi|1002923
1.6 10-7
-10.4
1380
814
destrin isoform a
gi|5802966
2.0 10-2
-10.3
816
460
solute carrier family 9 (sodium/hydrogen
gi|4759140
6.2 10-6
-9.8
8.8 10-5 6.0 10-4
-9.7 -9.6
not identified
exchanger); isoform 3 regulator 1 499 988
269 568
gelsolin-like capping protein isoform 9
gi||4504965 gi|55597035
1193
684
nuclear chloride channel
gi|4588526
7.7 10-4
-9.5
242
144
actinin; alpha 4
gi|119577215
8.2 10-5
-9.4
442
263
annexin A6
gi|35218
1.8 10-2
-9.3
1100
642
cytosolic malate dehydrogenase
gi|5174539
1.5 10-4
-9.1
239
141
Rap1-GTP-interacting adapter molecule
gi|26000235
1.5 10-5
-9.0
1080
630
LIM and SH3 domain protein 1
gi|1584035
8.2 10-7
-9.0
595 927
351 524
WD repeat domain 1 ACTB protein
gi|119613095 gi|15277503
1.6 10-6 3.0 10-5
-8.9 -8.7
695
395
adenylyl cyclase-associated protein variant
gi|62896585
2.3 10-5
-8.6
517
303
WD repeat-containing protein 1 isoform 1
gi|9257257
7.3 10-3
-8.6
1256
716
Rho GDP dissociation inhibitor (GDI) alpha
gi|4757768
1.0 10-3
-8.6
1420
847
profilin-1
gi|5822002
4.3 10-6
-8.4
1151
660
annexin A5
gi|809185
2.5 10-6
-8.4
L-plastin
1615
dx.doi.org/10.1021/pr100967v |J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10, 1603–1620
Journal of Proteome Research
ARTICLE
Table 3. Continued BVA spot
protein ID
protein ID
no.
fraction 2
fraction 6
average volume protein name
acc. no.
t test value -5
ratio
1098
641
G protein beta subunit
gi|306785
8.7 10
-8.3
192
112
heat shock protein 70
gi|292160
1.5 10-2
-8.0
1249
730
PGAM1
gi|49456447
1.9 10-4
-7.9
857
496
enolase 1 variant
gi|62896593
7.3 10-4
-7.9
615
360
coronin; actin binding protein; 1A
gi|5902134
2.0 10-6
-7.8
496
268
L-plastin
gi|4504965
1.4 10-4
-7.8
1348
787
transgelin-2
gi|9956026
2.6 10-3
-7.8
237 1316
1052 766
actinin; alpha 4 glutathione S-transferase P1
gi|119577215 gi|20664358
1.7 10-3 1.3 10-3
-7.7 -7.7
1385
818
glia maturation factor gamma
gi|19697925
5.3 10-4
-7.5
1221
703
proteasome activator complex subunit 1 isoform 1
gi|5453990
7.3 10-4
-7.4
515
298
WD repeat-containing protein 1 isoform 1 variant
gi|62897087
2.9 10-4
-7.3
957
537
phosphoglycerate kinase 1
gi|48145549
4.0 10-4
-7.2
1417
848
profilin-1
gi|5822002
1.7 10-4
-7.1
390
237
moesin; isoform CRA_b
gi|119625804
1.3 10-3
-7.1
1070 934
628 281
annexin A2 ACTB protein
gi|56966699 gi|15277503
4.7 10-6 2.7 10-5
-7.0 -7.0
1107
649
G protein beta subunit
gi|306785
6.8 10-4
-6.7
1176
672
tropomyosin 4
gi|4507651
1.4 10-3
-6.9
566
nd
not identified
4.4 10-4
-6.8
504
nd
not identified
3.2 10-2
-6.7
352
208
ezrin
gi|46249758
4.6 10-4
-6.4
1114
646
G protein beta subunit
gi|306785
2.1 10-5
-6.4
1001 263
574 154
twinfilin-like protein ubiquitin specific peptidase 5 isoform 2
gi|6005846 gi|148727247
1.5 10-4 2.1 10-4
-6.3 -6.3
696
346
pyruvate kinase 3 isoform 2
gi|67464392
5.7 10-4
-6.3
1042
604
annexin A1
gi|4502101
1.2 10-5
-6.3
1062
622
calcium binding protein 39
gi|7706481
2.1 10-4
-6.3
963
548
serpin peptidase inhibitor; clade B; member 1
gi|62898301
7.7 10-4
-6.1
705
407
tubulin; beta
gi|18088719
5.8 10-4
-6.1
929
533/1016
MHC class I antigen
gi|64976582
5.7 10-4
-6.1
195 197
113 nd
coronin 7 not identified
gi|109658548
2.5 10-4 4.4 10-3
-6.1 -6.1
962
550
adenosine deaminase
gi|1197210
8.9 10-5
-6.1
1236
714
14-3-3 protein beta
gi|4507949
2.3 10-3
-6.0
1057
615
annexin A1
gi|4502101
1.6 10-6
-6.0
1149
659
annexin A5
gi|809185
1.7 10-3
-6.0
363
209
interleukin-16
gi|27262655
1.1 10-3
-5.9
1368
nd
not identified
6.6 10-2
-5.9
699 1071
390 629
phosphoglucose isomerase gamma-glutamyl hydrolase
gi|14488680 gi|4503987
8.2 10-4 1.8 10-3
-5.9 -5.9
493
269
L-plastin
gi|4504965
3.0 10-3
-5.8
821
469
Rab GDP dissociation inhibitor beta
gi|119606836
6.9 10-6
-5.7
1376
812
cofilin 1
gi|5031635
1.9 10-3
-5.7
1453
865
MHC class I antigen
gi|229995
2.1 10-4
-5.6
myosin 9
gi|12667788
5.7 10-3
5.5
243
270
63
1202
429
PHB protein
gi|49456373
2.3 10-2
5.5
382 1361
95 526
NADH-ubiquinone oxidoreductase 75 kDa subunit myosin regulatory light chain MRCL3 variant
gi|21411235 gi|62896697
8.1 10-3 4.4 10-2
5.5 5.6
594
nd
4.0 10-2
5.7
1199
434
voltage-dependent anion channel 3 isoform b
gi|25188179
7.6 10-3
5.8
912
295
3-ketoacyl-CoA thiolase; mitochondrial
gi|509676
7.7 10-3
6.0
924
287
CS protein [Homo sapiens]
gi|48257138
1.2 10-2
6.0
not identified
1616
dx.doi.org/10.1021/pr100967v |J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10, 1603–1620
Journal of Proteome Research
ARTICLE
Table 3. Continued BVA spot
protein ID
protein ID
no.
fraction 2
fraction 6
average volume protein name
acc. no.
t test value -3
ratio
1275
nd
not identified
1.2 10
6.0
1255
nd
not identified
1.5 10-3
6.2
1145
nd
not identified
4.0 10-4
6.3
1415
583
ACTG1 protein
gi|40225338
1.1 10-3
6.6
1143
391
voltage-dependent anion channel 1
gi|4507879
4.0 10-3
6.7
164
chaperonin (HSP60)
gi|306890
4.7 10-2
6.8
1407
577
single-stranded DNA-binding protein; mitochondrial
gi|2624694
1.5 10-3
6.9
1393 1427
615 592
smooth muscle myosin light chain cytochrome c oxidase subunit Vb
gi|189017 gi|119622335
1.0 10-3 2.2 10-3
7.0 7.1
1428
594
ACTG1 protein
gi|40225338
1.1 10-3
7.3
1144
389
voltage-dependent anion channel 1
gi|4507879
1.2 10-3
7.4
1277
nd
not identified
1.3 10-3
7.7
764
nd
not identified
1.4 10-2
7.9
1186
416
267
63
601
338
replication protein A2; 32 kDa
gi|4506585
1.1 10-2
7.9
myosin 9
gi|12667788
2.5 10-3
7.9
a
Independent 2D-gels of fractions 2 and 6 samples obtained from lymphocytes of four donors were statistically evaluated using biological variance analysis (BVA). All included spots of fraction 2 and 6 samples are represented with their spot number in the corresponding mastergel. Parameters for variance analysis were set to p > 0.05 in t-test analysis and an average spot volume ratio >5.5 and 17). This is of special interest with regard to the ongoing controversy how transport of vesicles and degranulation are regulated by actin-associated elements. Actinin-alpha 4 (Figure S3A, Supporting Information), present in fraction 2, supports the bundling of actin filaments and thereby takes part in the regulation of actin-mediated exocytosis.41 Coronin controls actin dynamics through coordinated effects on the Arp2/3 complex and cofilin.42 By contrast, fraction 6 granules contained significantly higher amounts of myosin IIA (myosin 9), the functionally associated calcium/calmodulin-dependent myosin light chain kinase (MLCK), the myosin regulatory light chain 3 (MRLC3), and 1617
dx.doi.org/10.1021/pr100967v |J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10, 1603–1620
Journal of Proteome Research
ARTICLE
Figure 8. Verification of the different abundance of protein spots in individual fractions. Selected proteins with a higher abundance in fraction 2 are displayed as 3D images in (A). The results were verified by Western blotting for two different donors with specific antibodies (B). In contrast, the proteins displayed in (C) were enriched in fraction 6. Respective Western blot verification is shown in (D). Numbers indicate the fold change in volume ratios. Flotilin-1 abundance was unchanged and therefore served as a loading control (WL = whole lysate).
γ-actin (factor >7). In fact, MLCK, a key regulator of myosin II that has been implicated in vesicle release at neuronal synapses,43 was only detectable by mass spectrometry in fraction 6 samples (Figure S3B, Supporting Information). It was suggested that these proteins selectively regulate degranulation. Thus, inhibition of myosin IIA by blebbistatin blocked granzyme B secretion in human NK cells while the polarization of the microtubule organizing center (MTOC), the formation of a characteristic actin-ring and the development of a functional immunological synapse were not affected.44 In support of the differential mobilization hypothesis, it was later shown that blebbistatin did not abolish TCR- or PMA-induced FasL killing.8 Also dynamin II was enriched in fraction 6 sample as evidenced by DIGE and Western blot analyses (Figures 8C,D and S4B, Supporting Information). It is well established that dynamin II is involved in the regulation of the final fusion of the lysosomal and the plasma membrane during the kiss of death.45 Our results thus provide a further explanation why granzyme A secretion is blocked upon dynamin II inhibition.46 With these results in mind, one may hypothesize that the two species of effector vesicles are differently connected to the
cytoskeleton. Recently, using a set of anti-actin antibodies that apparently do not crossreact to other actin forms, Dugina and coworkers compared the distribution of cytoplasmic β- and γ-actin in fibroblasts and epithelial cells.47 They observed that γ-actin was distributed into the cortical microfilamental meshwork at the lamellar periphery, while β-actin was localized in circular bundles and in radial stress fibers. Translating this to the situation in cytotoxic cells, one could speculate that electrondense, granzyme-rich fraction 6 vesicles might be associated with the γ-actin meshwork close to the plasma membrane, whereas secretory lysosomes (fraction 2) might be connected to the fibrilliar β-actin network and are transported to the immunological synapse in a myosin IIA -and microtubuleindependent manner.6,8 The possible distinction between a myosin-dependent degranulation and an β-actin-dependent FasL transport would at least in part explain the recent studies on FasL release. The biphasic surface appearance of FasL5,6 appears to coincide with different signaling requirements and thresholds.7,8 Moreover, it was shown that the rapid release of prestored FasL does not require Ca2þ, whereas the expression of newly synthesized FasL is Ca2þ 1618
dx.doi.org/10.1021/pr100967v |J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10, 1603–1620
Journal of Proteome Research dependent.8 It is well established that the concentration of available Ca2þ correlates with the strength of the TCR signal. Thus, FasL is rapidly released in response to weak TCR signals while de novo synthesized FasL and degranulation (of granzyme pools) require strong TCR signals.9,7,48 In this context, it might be of interest that a bimodal secretion of cell-cell-communication molecules has not only been described for polarized neuronal or epithelial cells but also for T helper cells.49 Huse and colleagues recently reported that T helper cells release for example IL-2 and interferon-γ into the immunological synapse, whereas TNF and the chemokine CCL3 (MIP-1R) are secreted multidirectionally. The two secretion pathways were associated with distinct trafficking proteins suggesting molecularly distinct processes. Thus, one might speculate that the different transport mechanisms could also be utilized for the mobilization of individual effector proteins. In essence, however, it seems common sense that at least in in vitro situations, FasL as well as perforin and granzymes work best in killing target cells when released into the cytotoxic immunological synapse. Nonetheless, further studies might reveal other more systemic functions of the individual molecules in cell-cell communication that are associated with distinct trafficking proteins and processes.
’ CONCLUSION With the present report, we provide for the first time strong biochemical/proteomic evidence for the coexistence of two distinct types of effector vesicles in activated human T cells. We describe the luminal proteome of granzyme-containing granules and directly compare these granules with FasL-associated secretory lysosomes by 2D-DIGE. Our observations support the hypothesis that mobilization of FasL-containing vesicles and the degranulation of granzyme-containing granules rely on distinct signals that also might involve different cytoskeletal elements. ’ ASSOCIATED CONTENT
bS
Supporting Information Supplemental figures. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
’ AUTHOR INFORMATION Corresponding Author
*Prof. Dr. Ottmar Janssen, PhD, Christian-Albrechts-University, Institute of Immunology, UK S-H Campus Kiel ArnoldHeller-Str. 3 Bldg. 17, D-24105 Kiel, Germany. Phone: þ49 431 5973377. Fax: þ49 431 5973335. E-mail: ojanssen@email. uni-kiel.de.
’ ACKNOWLEDGMENT This work was supported by grants from the German Research Foundation (SFB 415 and SFB 877), the Cluster of Excellence “Inflammation at Interfaces”, the Innovationsfond SchleswigHolstein, and the Medical Faculty of the Christian-AlbrechtsUniversity of Kiel. ’ REFERENCES (1) Stinchcombe, J.; Bossi, G.; Griffiths, G. M. Linking albinism and immunity: the secrets of secretory lysosomes. Science 2004, 305 (5680), 55–59.
ARTICLE
(2) Blott, E. J.; Griffiths, G. M. Secretory lysosomes. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2002, 3 (2), 122–131. (3) Bossi, G.; Griffiths, G. M. Degranulation plays an essential part in regulating cell surface expression of Fas ligand in T cells and natural killer cells. Nat. Med. 1999, 5 (1), 90–96. (4) Blott, E. J.; Bossi, G.; Clark, R.; Zvelebil, M.; Griffiths, G. M. Fas ligand is targeted to secretory lysosomes via a proline-rich domain in its cytoplasmic tail. J. Cell Sci. 2001, 114 (Pt 13), 2405–2416. (5) Lettau, M.; Qian, J.; Kabelitz, D.; Janssen, O. Activation-dependent FasL expression in T lymphocytes and Natural Killer cells. Signal. Transduction 2004, 4, 206–211. (6) He, J. S.; Ostergaard, H. L. CTLs contain and use intracellular stores of FasL distinct from cytolytic granules. J. Immunol. 2007, 179 (4), 2339–2348. (7) He, J. S.; Gong, D. E.; Ostergaard, H. L. Stored Fas ligand, a mediator of rapid CTL-mediated killing, has a lower threshold for response than degranulation or newly synthesized Fas ligand. J. Immunol. 2010, 184 (2), 555–563. (8) Kassahn, D.; Nachbur, U.; Conus, S.; Micheau, O.; Schneider, P.; Simon, H. U.; Brunner, T. Distinct requirements for activationinduced cell surface expression of preformed Fas/CD95 ligand and cytolytic granule markers in T cells. Cell Death. Differ. 2009, 16 (1), 115–124. (9) Kessler, B.; Hudrisier, D.; Schroeter, M.; Tschopp, J.; Cerottini, J. C.; Luescher, I. F. Peptide modification or blocking of CD8, resulting in weak TCR signaling, can activate CTL for Fas- but not perforindependent cytotoxicity or cytokine production. J. Immunol. 1998, 161 (12), 6939–6946. (10) Schmidt, H.; Gelhaus, C.; Lucius, R.; Nebendahl, M.; Leippe, M.; Janssen, O. Enrichment and analysis of secretory lysosomes from lymphocyte populations. BMC Immunol. 2009, 10:41. (11) Schmidt, H.; Gelhaus, C.; Nebendahl, M.; Lettau, M.; Watzl, C.; Kabelitz, D.; Leippe, M.; Janssen, O. 2-D DIGE analyses of enriched secretory lysosomes reveal heterogeneous profiles of functionally relevant proteins in leukemic and activated human NK cells. Proteomics 2008, 8 (14), 2911–2925. (12) Schmidt, H.; Gelhaus, C.; Nebendahl, M.; Lettau, M.; Lucius, R.; Leippe, M.; Kabelitz, D.; Janssen, O. Effector granules in human T lymphocytes: The luminal proteome of secretory lysosomes from human T cells. Cell Commun. Signal. 2011, 9:4. (13) Lettau, M.; Qian, J.; Linkermann, A.; Latreille, M.; Larose, L.; Kabelitz, D.; Janssen, O. The adaptor protein Nck interacts with Fas ligand: Guiding the death factor to the cytotoxic immunological synapse. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103 (15), 5911–5916. (14) Hoffmann, R.; Valencia, A. A gene network for navigating the literature. Nat. Genet. 2004, 36 (7), 664. (15) Hu, Z. Z.; Valencia, J. C.; Huang, H.; Chi, A.; Shabanowitz, J.; Hearing, V. J.; Appella, E.; Wu, C. Comparative Bioinformatics Analyses and Profiling of Lysosome-Related Organelle Proteomes. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 2007, 259 (1-3), 147–160. (16) Lettau, M.; Schmidt, H.; Kabelitz, D.; Janssen, O. Secretory lysosomes and their cargo in T and NK cells. Immunol. Lett. 2007, 108 (1), 10–19. (17) Lettau, M.; Paulsen, M.; Kabelitz, D.; Janssen, O. Storage, expression and function of Fas ligand, the key death factor of immune cells. Curr. Med. Chem. 2008, 15 (17), 1684–1696. (18) Qian, J.; Chen, W.; Lettau, M.; Podda, G.; Zornig, M.; Kabelitz, D.; Janssen, O. Regulation of FasL expression: a SH3 domain containing protein family involved in the lysosomal association of FasL. Cell Signal. 2006, 18 (8), 1327–1337. (19) Nikolov, N. P.; Shimizu, M.; Cleland, S.; Bailey, D.; Aoki, J.; Strom, T.; Schwartzberg, P. L.; Candotti, F.; Siegel, R. M. Systemic autoimmunity and defective Fas ligand secretion in the absence of the Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein. Blood 2010, 116 (5), 740–747. (20) Clark, R.; Griffiths, G. M. Lytic granules, secretory lysosomes and disease. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2003, 15 (5), 516–521. (21) Mincheva-Nilsson, L.; Nagaeva, O.; Sundqvist, K. G.; Hammarstrom, M. L.; Hammarstrom, S.; Baranov, V. gammadelta T 1619
dx.doi.org/10.1021/pr100967v |J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10, 1603–1620
Journal of Proteome Research cells of human early pregnancy decidua: evidence for cytotoxic potency. Int. Immunol. 2000, 12 (5), 585–596. (22) Raja, S. M.; Wang, B.; Dantuluri, M.; Desai, U. R.; Demeler, B.; Spiegel, K.; Metkar, S. S.; Froelich, C. J. Cytotoxic cell granule-mediated apoptosis. Characterization of the macromolecular complex of granzyme B with serglycin. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277 (51), 49523–49530. (23) Metkar, S. S.; Wang, B.; guilar-Santelises, M.; Raja, S. M.; UhlinHansen, L.; Podack, E.; Trapani, J. A.; Froelich, C. J. Cytotoxic cell granule-mediated apoptosis: perforin delivers granzyme B-serglycin complexes into target cells without plasma membrane pore formation. Immunity 2002, 16 (3), 417–428. (24) Kolter, T.; Winau, F.; Schaible, U. E.; Leippe, M.; Sandhoff, K. Lipid-binding proteins in membrane digestion, antigen presentation, and antimicrobial defense. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280 (50), 41125–41128. (25) Pena, S. V.; Hanson, D. A.; Carr, B. A.; Goralski, T. J.; Krensky, A. M. Processing, subcellular localization, and function of 519 (granulysin), a human late T cell activation molecule with homology to small, lytic, granule proteins. J. Immunol. 1997, 158 (6), 2680–2688. (26) Hanson, D. A.; Kaspar, A. A.; Poulain, F. R.; Krensky, A. M. Biosynthesis of granulysin, a novel cytolytic molecule. Mol. Immunol. 1999, 36 (7), 413–422. (27) Stenger, S.; Hanson, D. A.; Teitelbaum, R.; Dewan, P.; Niazi, K. R.; Froelich, C. J.; Ganz, T.; Thoma-Uszynski, S.; Melian, A.; Bogdan, C.; Porcelli, S. A.; Bloom, B. R.; Krensky, A. M.; Modlin, R. L. An antimicrobial activity of cytolytic T cells mediated by granulysin. Science 1998, 282 (5386), 121–125. (28) Dieli, F.; Troye-Blomberg, M.; Ivanyi, J.; Fournie, J. J.; Krensky, A. M.; Bonneville, M.; Peyrat, M. A.; Caccamo, N.; Sireci, G.; Salerno, A. Granulysin-dependent killing of intracellular and extracellular Mycobacterium tuberculosis by Vgamma9/Vdelta2 T lymphocytes. J. Infect. Dis. 2001, 184 (8), 1082–1085. (29) Walch, M.; Latinovic-Golic, S.; Velic, A.; Sundstrom, H.; Dumrese, C.; Wagner, C. A.; Groscurth, P.; Ziegler, U. Perforin enhances the granulysin-induced lysis of Listeria innocua in human dendritic cells. BMC Immunol. 2007, 8, 14. (30) Makedonas, G.; Banerjee, P. P.; Pandey, R.; Hersperger, A. R.; Sanborn, K. B.; Hardy, G. A.; Orange, J. S.; Betts, M. R. Rapid upregulation and granule-independent transport of perforin to the immunological synapse define a novel mechanism of antigen-specific CD8þ T cell cytotoxic activity. J. Immunol. 2009, 182 (9), 5560–5569. (31) Uellner, R.; Zvelebil, M. J.; Hopkins, J.; Jones, J.; MacDougall, L. K.; Morgan, B. P.; Podack, E.; Waterfield, M. D.; Griffiths, G. M. Perforin is activated by a proteolytic cleavage during biosynthesis which reveals a phospholipid-binding C2 domain. EMBO J. 1997, 16 (24), 7287–7296. (32) Klumperman, J.; Kuliawat, R.; Griffith, J. M.; Geuze, H. J.; Arvan, P. Mannose 6-phosphate receptors are sorted from immature secretory granules via adaptor protein AP-1, clathrin, and syntaxin 6-positive vesicles. J. Cell Biol. 1998, 141 (2), 359–371. (33) Dupuis, M.; Schaerer, E.; Krause, K. H.; Tschopp, J. The calcium-binding protein calreticulin is a major constituent of lytic granules in cytolytic T lymphocytes. J. Exp. Med. 1993, 177 (1), 1–7. (34) Smyth, M. J.; Kelly, J. M.; Sutton, V. R.; Davis, J. E.; Browne, K. A.; Sayers, T. J.; Trapani, J. A. Unlocking the secrets of cytotoxic granule proteins. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2001, 70 (1), 18–29. (35) Wenzel, J.; Sanzenbacher, R.; Ghadimi, M.; Lewitzky, M.; Zhou, Q.; Kaplan, D. R.; Kabelitz, D.; Feller, S. M.; Janssen, O. Multiple interactions of the cytosolic polyproline region of the CD95 ligand: hints for the reverse signal transduction capacity of a death factor. FEBS Lett. 2001, 509 (2), 255–262. (36) Miki, H.; Takenawa, T. Regulation of actin dynamics by WASP family proteins. J. Biochem. 2003, 134 (3), 309–313. (37) Lettau, M.; Pieper, J.; Gerneth, A.; Lengl-Janssen, B.; Voss, M.; Linkermann, A.; Schmidt, H.; Gelhaus, C.; Leippe, M.; Kabelitz, D.; Janssen, O. The adapter protein Nck: role of individual SH3 and SH2 binding modules for protein interactions in T lymphocytes. Protein Sci. 2010, 19 (4), 658–669.
ARTICLE
(38) Tanaka, T.; Camerini, D.; Seed, B.; Torimoto, Y.; Dang, N. H.; Kameoka, J.; Dahlberg, H. N.; Schlossman, S. F.; Morimoto, C. Cloning and functional expression of the T cell activation antigen CD26. J. Immunol. 1992, 149 (2), 481–486. (39) Casey, T. M.; Meade, J. L.; Hewitt, E. W. Organelle proteomics: identification of the exocytic machinery associated with the natural killer cell secretory lysosome. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2007, 6 (5), 767–780. (40) Stoeckle, C.; Gouttefangeas, C.; Hammer, M.; Weber, E.; Melms, A.; Tolosa, E. Cathepsin W expressed exclusively in CD8þ T cells and NK cells, is secreted during target cell killing but is not essential for cytotoxicity in human CTLs. Exp. Hematol. 2009, 37 (2), 266–275. (41) Honda, K.; Yamada, T.; Endo, R.; Ino, Y.; Gotoh, M.; Tsuda, H.; Yamada, Y.; Chiba, H.; Hirohashi, S. Actinin-4, a novel actinbundling protein associated with cell motility and cancer invasion. J. Cell Biol. 1998, 140 (6), 1383–1393. (42) Cai, L.; Marshall, T. W.; Uetrecht, A. C.; Schafer, D. A.; Bear, J. E. Coronin 1B coordinates Arp2/3 complex and cofilin activities at the leading edge. Cell 2007, 128 (5), 915–929. (43) Mochida, S. Role of myosin in neurotransmitter release: functional studies at synapses formed in culture. J. Physiol. Paris 1995, 89 (2), 83–94. (44) Andzelm, M. M.; Chen, X.; Krzewski, K.; Orange, J. S.; Strominger, J. L. Myosin IIA is required for cytolytic granule exocytosis in human NK cells. J. Exp. Med. 2007, 204 (10), 2285–2291. (45) Stinchcombe, J. C.; Griffiths, G. M. Secretory mechanisms in cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2007, 23, 495–517. (46) Arneson, L. N.; Segovis, C. M.; Gomez, T. S.; Schoon, R. A.; Dick, C. J.; Lou, Z.; Billadeau, D. D.; Leibson, P. J. Dynamin 2 regulates granule exocytosis during NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity. J. Immunol. 2008, 181 (10), 6995–7001. (47) Dugina, V.; Zwaenepoel, I.; Gabbiani, G.; Clement, S.; Chaponnier, C. Beta and gamma-cytoplasmic actins display distinct distribution and functional diversity. J. Cell Sci. 2009, 122 (Pt 16), 2980–2988. (48) Berg, N. N.; Puente, L. G.; Dawicki, W.; Ostergaard, H. L. Sustained TCR signaling is required for mitogen-activated protein kinase activation and degranulation by cytotoxic T lymphocytes. J. Immunol. 1998, 161 (6), 2919–2924. (49) Huse, M.; Lillemeier, B. F.; Kuhns, M. S.; Chen, D. S.; Davis, M. M. T cells use two directionally distinct pathways for cytokine secretion. Nat. Immunol. 2006, 7 (3), 247–255.
1620
dx.doi.org/10.1021/pr100967v |J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10, 1603–1620