Subscriber access provided by UB + Fachbibliothek Chemie | (FU-Bibliothekssystem)
Article
Effects of pyrolysis conditions and ash formation on gasification rates of biomass char Anna Strandberg, Per Holmgren, David R. Wagner, Roger Molinder, Henrik Wiinikka, Kentaro Umeki, and Markus Broström Energy Fuels, Just Accepted Manuscript • Publication Date (Web): 15 May 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on May 15, 2017
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
Energy & Fuels is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 33
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Energy & Fuels
1
Effects of pyrolysis conditions and ash formation on
2
gasification rates of biomass char
3
Anna Strandberg †*, Per Holmgren †, David R. Wagner †,§, Roger Molinder ‡, Henrik Wiinikka ‡,
4
Kentaro Umeki #, and Markus Broström †
5
†
6
Conversion Laboratory, SE-901 87 Umeå, Sweden
7
‡
RISE Energy Technology Center, Box 726, SE-941 28 Piteå, Sweden
8
#
Luleå University of Technology, Division of Energy Science, Energy Engineering, SE-971 87
9
Luleå, Sweden
Umeå University, Department of Applied Physics and Electronics, Thermochemical Energy
10
11
ABSTRACT: Pyrolysis conditions and the presence of ash forming elements significantly
12
influence char properties and its oxidation or gasification reactivity. In this study, intrinsic
13
gasification rates of char from high heating rate pyrolysis were analyzed with isothermal
14
thermogravimetry. The char particles were prepared from two biomasses at three size ranges, and
15
at two temperatures. Reactivity dependence on original particle size was found only for small
16
wood particles that had higher intrinsic char gasification rates. Pyrolysis temperature had no
17
significant effect on char reactivity within the range tested. Observations of ash formation
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
1
Energy & Fuels
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
18
highlighted that reactivity was influenced by the presence of ash forming elements, not only at
19
the active char sites, but also through prohibition of contact between char and gasification agent
20
by ash layer formation with properties highly depending on ash composition.
Page 2 of 33
21 22
1. INTRODUCTION
23
For the design of different thermochemical conversion reactors for solid biomass fuels the rate
24
of char conversion is an important design criterion. Devolatilization is relatively rapid and thus
25
the slower char gasification is considered to be the rate limiting step of the process,1,2 implying
26
that high char reactivity is important to achieve high specific capacity. The conditions during
27
devolatilization affect the chemical and physical properties of the char and therefore also the char
28
reactivity; high pyrolysis temperature and prolonged retention time generally reduce the
29
reactivity of char particles.2-4 Furthermore, high heating rates during pyrolysis tend to increase
30
the char reactivity for both oxidation and gasification.2,5 This can be explained by development
31
of higher surface area of chars generated at higher heating rates.5 Similar results have been
32
reported from studies on coal char.6
33
Milling of biomass to an acceptable size distribution is a bottleneck in the development of
34
systems for combustion or gasification of biomass bulk solids. It is energy demanding and also
35
many biomass bulk solids are often associated with feeding problems connected to their
36
structure.7 By using larger particles the milling costs could be reduced.8 However, previous
37
studies on the effect of particle size shows that larger particles can be incompletely converted in
38
the short residence time of an entrained flow gasifier and thereby reduce the efficiency of the
39
process.9-11 Larger particles have larger temperature gradients due to thermal inertia, and the
40
particle size influences the mass and heat transfer, and to some extent, secondary reactions inside
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
2
Page 3 of 33
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Energy & Fuels
41
the particles.11-13 In addition, the relative importance of gravity becomes higher with an increase
42
in particle size, resulting in shorter particle residence time (i.e. lower char conversion).
43
Several studies have addressed the correlations between particle size and apparent reactivity
44
from different perspectives. Moilanen et al.14 evaluated the effect of the particle size on char
45
quality for wood particle sizes between 0.5 and 10 mm. Less reactive char was produced from
46
larger sized particles, probably connected to intra-particle transport and secondary
47
transformation of pyrolysis products. Similar findings were published by Gómez-Barea et al.15
48
who studied the gasification reactivity of different biomass char particle sizes at different CO2
49
partial pressures and temperatures in a thermogravimetric analyzer (TGA). The measured
50
gasification reactivity decreased as the particle size increased. Zanzi et al.16 also concluded that
51
the reactivity of char was increased when small fuel particles were subjected to rapid pyrolysis.
52
Several other publications also investigated how initial particle size can affect the char reactivity
53
by mass diffusion.10,17 A less elaborated effect is how the intrinsic char properties are affected by
54
the different temperature history experienced by particles of different size in the ranges relevant
55
for entrained flow reactors.
56
Besides pyrolysis conditions, the ash forming elements present in the fuel are also known to
57
play important roles in reactivity and char burnout. Elements from the alkali metal group,
58
primarily K, are known to “catalyze” conversion reactions and thereby increase reactivity.18-23
59
The change in reaction rates between different biomasses have been studied by others and the
60
suggested mechanism of catalytic ash elements has been complemented with descriptions of a
61
deactivating effect of counter ions such as Si, P and Al.24-28 Supported by reactivity
62
measurements, the hypothesis is based on K being captured in ash forming reactions, forming
63
e.g. silicates or phosphates instead of being available on active char sites. Simple and useful, but
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
3
Energy & Fuels
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 4 of 33
64
empirical and fuel specific indexes have been used to correlate contents of ash forming elements
65
to the inhibiting effects observed;25,26,28 in short, ratios describing the presence of catalytic
66
potential. To date, detailed ash formation reactions have not been mechanistically coupled to the
67
“deactivating” observations.
68
The first objective of this study was to evaluate intrinsic gasification rates of chars generated
69
from rapid devolatilization of biomass particles with different size, to study if and how char
70
reactivity changes depending on the parameters varied. Two different fuels were included to
71
represent both woody and agricultural biomass: wood from Scots pine and straw from wheat.
72
Isothermal TGA analyses of ground char produced in a drop tube reactor was performed in a
73
CO2 atmosphere to determine the effect of initial particle size and pyrolysis conditions on the
74
intrinsic rate of char gasification.
75
The second objective of this study was to compare gasification profiles of chars from the two
76
fuels, and to further develop the theories of fuel-ash interactions using compositional information
77
together with observations on reactivity profiles and ash formation during gasification. This part
78
was accomplished using the same samples and methods mentioned above, but complemented
79
with interrupted gasification experiments to enable chemical and morphological analysis of
80
gasification residues at different degrees of conversion.
81 82
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
4
Page 5 of 33
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Energy & Fuels
83
2. EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
84
2.1. Biomass feedstock and char preparation
85
Wood from Scots Pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and straw from wheat (Triticum aestivum) was
86
dried at 105 °C and milled to