Enantioselective synthesis of (-)-trichodiene - The Journal of Organic

Jun Ishihara, Rie Nonaka, Yuki Terasawa, Ryota Shiraki, Kazuo Yabu, Hiromi Kataoka, Yuichi Ochiai, and Kin-ichi Tadano. The Journal of Organic Chemist...
0 downloads 0 Views 1MB Size
Download PDF
J. Org. C h e m . 1993,58, 6255-6265

6255

Enantioselective Synthesis of (-)-Trichodiene John C. Gilbert’ and Robert D. Selliah Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712 Received March 16, 1993 (Revised Manuscript Received August 10, 19930)

An enantioselective synthesis of trichodiene 1 has been accomplished. The key bond between the vicinal quaternary centers is formed by way of an Ireland-Claisen rearrangement of the ketene silyl acetal 24. The rearrangement occurs with complete facial selectivity and excellent diastereoselectivity to give an advanced intermediate that is directly converted to ent-trichodiene, (-)-l.

The sesquiterpene trichodiene, (+)-l,lis the biogenetic precursor to the trichothecene mycotoxins, e.g., verrucarol (%a),anguidine (2b),and deoxynivalenol(2c),2which are fungal metabolites possessing diverse biological activity.3 The key role of 1in the biosynthesis of the trichothecenes and the synthetic challenge posed by the presence of two contiguous asymmetric quaternary centers in the molecule4 have prompted several groups to synthesize racemic trichodiene.K We report here the development of a chiral route to ent-trichodiene, (+l, the unnatural antipode of this hydrocarbon, via an Ireland ester-enolate Claisen rearrangement: for which we define the facial preference and diastereoselectivity. The methodology that has been developed sets the stage for a highly convergent enantioselective synthesis of the trichothecenes 2 themselves. The present approach to 1 relied on studies toward trichodiene previously explored by our group.%-’ One of these investigations established that @)-ketenesilyl acetal 3 is formed through chelation-controlled deprotonation and subsequent silylation of the corresponding ester and that the [3,3]-sigmatropic rearrangement of 3 occurs preferentially through a chairlike transition state; the resulting product has the correct relative stereochemical disposition about the vicinal quaternary centers for elaboration to trichodiene (Scheme I).6c In a companion study it was shown that the Claisen rearrangement of certain conformationally rigid cyclohexyl derivatives takes place exclusiuely from the equatorial face (eq 1)to give intermediates with vicinal quaternary centers.’ This facial Abstract published in Advance ACS Abstracts, October 1, 1993. (1) (a) Machida, Y.; Nozoe, S. Tetrahedron 1972,28,5105-5111. (b) Nozoe, S.; Machida, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1970, 2671-2674. (2) For lead references see, Zamir, L. 0.;Devor, K. A.; Nikolakakis; Nadeau,Y.;Saurio1,F.TetrahedronLett. 1992,33,5181-5184,Heskethy, A. R.; Gledhill, L.; Marah, D. C.; Bycroft, B. W.; Dewick, P. M.; Gilbert, J. J. Chem. SOC.,Chem. Commun. 1990,1184-1186. (3) Joffe, A. Z. Fusarium Species: Their Biology and Tozicology;John Wiley & Sone, Inc.: New York, 1986. (4) Martin, S. F. Tetrahedron 1980,36, 419-460. (5) (a)Tanaka, M.; Sakai, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991,32,5581-5584. (b)Harding, K. E.; Clement, K. 5.;Tseng, C.-Y. J. Org.Chem. 1990,55, 4403-4410. (c) Gilbert, J. C.; Kelly, T. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30, 4193-4196. (d) Snowden, R. L.;Brauchli, R.; Sonnay, P. Helu. Chim. Acta 1989, 72,670-593. ( e )Pearaon, A. J.; O’Brien,M. K. J. Org. Chem. 1989, 54, 4663-4673. (f) Pearson, A. J.; O’Brien, M. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1987, 1445-1447. (9) VanMiddlesworth, F. L. J . Og. Chem. 1986,51,5019-5021. (h) Kraus, G. A.; Thomas, P. J. Zbid. 1986,51,503505. (i) Gilbert, J. C.; Kelly, T. A. Zbid. 1986,51,4485-4488. (i)Gilbert, J. C.;Wiechman,B. E. Zbid. 1986,51,258-260. (k) Harding,K. E.;Clement, K. S. ibid. 1984,49,387&3871. (1) Schlessinger, R. H.; Schultz,J. A. Zbid. 1983,48,402-408. (m) Suda, M. TetrahedronLett. 1982,23,427-428. (n) Welch, S. C.; Rao,A. S. C. P.; Gibbs, C. G.; Wong, R. Y. J.Org.Chem. 1980,45,4077-4085. (6) Ireland, R. E.; Mueller, R. H.; Willard, A. K. J.Am. Chem. SOC. 1976,93, 2868-2877. (7) Rojas, H. M. A. Thesis, University of Texas at Austin, 1983.

Me

R,

R*

R3

w

R,

2a H OH OH H H 2b OH OAc OAc H H 2C OH H OH OH =O

selectivity appears to be the result of interaction between the substituents at the terminus of the allyl moiety and H

Me

K Me qHO

the axial hydrogen atoms at C(3) and C(5) of the ring. The retrosynthetic analysis outlined in Figure 1 summarizes a strategy that combines diastereoselective formation of a (2)-ketenesilyl acetal from a chiral ester with subsequent rearrangement having specificfacial selectivity to enable a chiral synthesisof trichodiene (1). The linchpin of this synthetic sequence is ester 4, in which the group G is an effective chelator of metal ions to ensure chelation control in the deprotonation step leading to the (Z)-ketene silyl acetal;” thermal rearrangement of this intermediate via a preferred chairlike transition state would produce an advanced intermediate to trichodiene. The carboxylate portion of ester 4 was envisioned to arise from the known @-ketoester 6.8 The proposed approach was first assessed on racemic substrates. Thus, reduction of 6 gave the three diastereomeric hydroxy esters7a-c in a ratio of 35:45:20 (eq 2). The relative stereochemistries of the three diastereomers were assigned based on the observed coupling constants, (8) Djeraeai,C.; Burakevich, J.; Chamberlin,J. W.; Elad, D.; Toda, T.; Stork, G. J. Am. Chem. SOC.1964,86,465-471.

0022-3263/93/1958-6255$04.00/00 1993 American Chemical Society

6256 J. Org. Chem., Vol. 58, No. 23, 1993

Gilbert and Selliah Scheme I

(i) Ki IMDS

w

Me

(ii)R,SiCI

3

trichodiene failed. Indeed, the alkoxide enolate 13a derived from 13, itself prepared from acid 7b and the known allyl alcohol 5,11 did not rearrange even under conditions of reflux in THF (Scheme 111);rather, the only isolable product was the ester 15 derived from 8-elimination of 13. This undesired result presumably reflects increased steric hindrance in the transition state for rearrangement of 13a as compared to that for Sa. An alternate route to effect the rearrangementw a based ~ on the work of Ireland's report that ketene silyl acetals could be produced from ester enolates having 8-alkoxy leaving groups (eq 3).12 Thus, it was felt that prior

JH-H, in the lH NMR spectra of these compound^.^ The b-hydroxyallyl ester9 was prepared from 7b (Scheme 11)

(i) LDNTMSCI

d

Bl10"" t&o-

l 01) RT

0 Me""\/

Me

Me Me O X O

(iii)HQ

L

Me

0 x 0

*

B"o,tl** Me

(iv) CH,N,

80%

(3)

(-)-7b

to examine the potential of creating vicinal quaternary centers by the Claisen rearrangement of alkoxide eno1ates;although the dianionic modification of the Claisen rearrangement of acyclic &hydroxy allyl esters is known,l0its applicabilityin a system like 9 was unexplored. Formation of the alkoxide enolate Sa, thermal rearrangement, and transesterification afforded a product of rearrangement (40% yield), tentatively assigned the stereochemistry shown in 10, together with the @elimination product11 (10% yield) and a mixture of 9 and its C(1) epimer (32% yield). The fact that only a single diastereomer arising from the rearrangement was seen in the lH NhfR spectrum implied that complete facial selectivity attends the rearrangement of Sa. Si facial selectivitywas expected for the rearrangement, based on analogy to the stereochemical outcome depicted in eq l7and the assumption that the preferred conformation for the rearrangement would have the methyl and alkoxide functions of9a equatorial. Rigorous proof of the selectivity was provided by an X-ray crystallographic analysis of the 3,5-dinitrobenzoate ester (DNB) derived from 10 (Scheme 11). The stereochemical assignments in 10 show that the dianionic version of the Claisen rearrangement of an appropriate analog of 9 might allow formation of the C(1)-C(1') carbon-carbon bond of 1 to afford a product having both the relative and the absolute stereochemistry of (+)-trichodiene. Unfortunately, extension of this methodology to the preparation of an advanced intermediate for synthesis of (9) For a detailed discussion of the structural assignments of 7a and

70 see: Selliah, R. D. Ph. D. Dissertation, The University of Texas at

Austin, 1992. (10) (a) Kurth, M. J.; Yu, C.-M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1984, 25, 60036006. (b) Fujisawa, T.; Tajima, K.; Ito, M.; Sato, T. Chem. Lett. 1984, 1169-1172.

protection of the hydroxy group in 13 would enable formation of the intermediate ketene silyl acetal for the [3,33 -sigmatropicrearrangement.13 An important criterion for the protecting group was that it not inhibit the chelation needed to ensure formation of the (,&ketene acetal."This excluded protection of the alcohol as the silylether because it is known that the oxygen atom of such a group is a poor chelator of metal ions when compared to alkyl ethers.14 Therefore, a methyl ether seemed appropriate from the point of view of ease of installation and removal of the protecting group.15 To prepare the appropriate carboxylate portion and to set the stage for a chiral synthesis of 1, the 8-keto ester 6 was reduced with bakers' yeast under fermenting conditions to give (-)-7b,as the only product, in 40% yield but in only 45 f 2% enantioselectivity (ee).le Reductions of related &keto esters with bakers' yeast under a variety of conditions are reported in the literature, and product ee's up to 98% have been observed.17 Given that the enantioselectivity in the yeast reduction of acyclic 8-keto esters is influenced by the steric bulk at the site of reduction,lEit is likely that the low ee seen in the reduction (11) Harding, K. E.; Clement, K. S.; Gilbert, J. C.; Wiechman, B. E.

J. Org. Chem. 1984,49,2049-2050.

(12) Ireland. R. E.: N0rbeck.D. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986,107,32793285. (13) Attempts to trap dianion 13a by addition of (trimethybily1)trifluoromethane sulfonate or of diiiopropylsilyl bw(trifluoromehesulfonate)afforded rac-16 as the only isolable product, in yields of 65 and 76%,respectively. (14) (a) Keck, G. E.; Castellino, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1986,27,281284. (b) Keck, G. E.; Castellino, 5.;Wiley, M. R. J. Org. Chem. 1986,51, 5480-5482. (c) Shambayati, S.; Blake, J. F.; Wierschke, S. G.; Jorgensen, 1990,112,697-703. W. L.; Schreiber, S. L. J.Am. Chem. SOC. (15) Greene,T.W.;Wuts,P.G.A.otectiueGroupsinOrganicSynthesis, 2nd ed.; Wiley New York, 1991; pp 15-17. (16) Enantiomeric purity was determined by 1H NMR analpie of (-)7b in the presence of (+)-Eu(hfc)~ shift reagent. Resolutionof the methyl triplet of the ester was sufficient for the desired analysis.

J. Org. Chem., Vol. 58, No. 23, 1993 6257

Enantioselective Synthesis of (-)-Trichodiene

4

a 5

6

Figure 1. Retrosynthetic analysis for preparation of trichodiene (1).

Scheme IIa OH

Me'"'

3

0

,a -

: -M e&

'Li

R

& (

Me,"' Me i

MeMe

Me'"'

-

13 M&''

15

of 6 reflects such steric factors. The absolute configurations of the chiral centers in (-)-7bwere determined to be lR, 2S,and 4s by hydrolysis and decarboxylation of the ester to the known (-)-(S)-3-methylcyclohexanone(16).l9 This stereochemical outcome is similar to that observed with the yeast reduction of related systems.17

(-)-16

Methylation of (-)-7b (Scheme IV) required in situ trapping of the alkoxide, since attempts to produce the desired ether 17 by sequential formation of the alkoxide (17) (a) Deol, B. 5.;Ridley, D.D.;Simpson, G. W. Auut. J. Chem. 1976, 29,2454-2467.(b) Herrandh, B.; Seebach, D.Helu. Chim.Acta 1989,72, 690-714. (c) FrBter, G.; Gthther, W.; MUer, U. Helu. Chim.Acta 1989, 72,1846-1851.

followed by alkylation led to substantial 8-elimination. The product was contaminated with some 8% of its C(1) epimer, 18, as determined by 'H NMR spectroscopy. Hydrolysis of the mixture of 17 and 18 according to the procedure of Seebach e t aL20 afforded the acid 19 as a single compound after recrystallization. For the purpose of model studies, 19 was fist esterified with prenyl alcohol (Scheme IV),following a procedure described by Turner e t d 2 1 to form ester 20 without epimerization, as shown by ita lH NMR spectrum.22 The next task was to subject 20 to the conditions prescribed by Ireland e t al.12for the formation and rearrangement (18) Hudlicky,T.;Tsunoda,T.;Gadamasetti,K.G.;Murry,J.A.;Keck, G. E. J. Org. Chem. 1991,56,3619-3623. (lQ)Thurkauf,A.; Hillery, P.; Jacobson, A. E.; Rice, K. C. J. Org. Chem. 1987,52, 6466-6467. (20) Seebach, D.;Renaud, P.; Schweizer, W. B.; Zifger, M. F. Helu.

Chim. Acta, 1984,67,1843-1853. (21) Chandrasekaren,S.;Turner,J. V. Synth. Commun. 1982,12,727731.

6258

Gilbert and Selliah

J. Org. Chem., Vol. 58, No. 23, 1993 Scheme IVa MeQ MeQ

OTMS

Me'"'

q

22

Me 21

Me

23

20 R1 = Me, R2 = CH2CHC(Me)2 a Reagentax (i) CHsI, KH, THF, -20 "C, 95%;(ii) 4 N HC1, reflux, 88%; (iii) MsCl, TEA, CH2C12, then DMAP,prenyl alcohol, 96%; (iv) LDA, TMSCl, TEA, THF, -110 OC; (v) (a) rt, 12 h, (b) HaO+; (c) CHzN2.

of the intermediate ketene silyl acetal. Their use of HMPA as a co-solvent had to be avoided in order to optimize chelation control for the formation of the enolate, since HMPA would compete for the metal ion involved in the intramolecular complex. Although omission of HMPA might have affected the rate and regioselectivity of silylation of the enolate and even fostered elimination, this was not to be the case. Indeed, Ireland-Claisen rearrangement of 20 afforded a gratifying 76 7% yield of a rearranged ester as a single diastereomer (NMR spectroscopy), which was initially assigned as 22 (Scheme IV), the product of si facial selectivity. The @-elimination product was not detectable by lH NMR spectroscopy, under conditions such that as little as 5 % of it would have been seen. A puzzling observation arose from the lH NMR spectrum of the rearrangement product: the signal for C(2)-H appeared as a broad multiplet, implying an equatorial or pseudoequatorial orientation for this proton. It should be in an axial position if the same facial selectivity as seen in the rearrangement of 9a had prevailed with 21. Such an axial orientation of C(2)-H is apparent in the solid structure of 12 and in the 'H NMR spectrum of 10, in which the signal for this proton appears as a doublet-ofdoublets with coupling constants of 11.4 ( J = d and 4.1 (Jq& Hz. The NMR data for the product derived from 20 are thus more consistent with the stereochemistry expected from re facial selectivity, which would provide 23 instead of 22 (Scheme IV). Despite the uncertainty regarding the facial selectivity, the formation of only a single diastereomer from the silylation and rearrangement of 20 was a key observation. It proved that thermal isomerization of ketene silyl acetal 21 occurs with complete facial selectivity and strongly implies that a single diastereomer of 21 is produced as well. Confirmation of the latter point was available from the 'H NMR spectrum of 21, in which only one singlet for methoxy and one doublet for the C-4 methyl protons were detected. It is highly unlikely that a minor amount (>45 7% ) of anokher diastereomer would have all its signals obscured by the resonances of the major diastereomer. Although this result did not define the geometry of the ketene acetal, precedent%dictates that chelation control directs the enolization of the ester and fosters eventual formation of (2)-ketene silyl acetal 21. (22) The lack of epimerization is mainly of academic interest in the present instance, since the stereochemistryat C(1) is ultimately lost upon formation of the ketene silyl acetal.

The successful Ireland-Claisen rearrangement of 20 prompted application of this synthetic concept to the creation of the trichodiene skeleton. The requisite precursor for the rearrangement is ester 24 (Scheme V),which was prepared from the optically active carboxylic acid 19 and alcohol 5 with the methodology outlined for the synthesis of 20. Ireland-Claisen reaction of 24 by the protocol used with 20 afforded a mixture of two diastereomeric products in the ratio of 92:8 and initially assigned as 26 and 27, respectively. The observed ratio reflects dominance of the chairlike pathway for the [3,31 sigmatropic rearrangement and correlates well with those reported by Gilbert et al. for the rearrangement of related systems.23 As was noted for the rearrangement product from 20, a disturbing feature in the lH NMR spectrum of the product mixture was that the C(2)-Hresonancewasa broad multiplet. There was no direct method for analyzing these compounds to confirm whether the distortion was due to a conformational effect or was the result of a facial selectivity different from that observed with 9a. This question was answered, however, by conversion of the major diastereomer to a solid iodo ether, which was found to have structure 28 by X-ray crystallography. Rearrangement mixture (i) NaHC03, 12, 83% (ii) DIBAL-H, toluene, 99%. e H?

Consequently,the ketene silyl acetal 25 rearranges with re rather than si facial selectivity to give 29 and 30 (Scheme V). Moreover, the characterization of 28 confirms that 29 has the same relative stereochemistry as 1 at its vicinal quaternary centers, the result of a chairlike rearrangement of the (2)-ketene silyl acetal 25 (Figure 2). Finally, on the reasonable assumption that the same re selectivity applies to the rearrangement of 21, the correct structural assignment for its product is indeed 23. The structural assignments derived from 28 explain the appearance of C(2)-Has a broad multiplet in the lH NMR spectra of 23,29, and 30. The steric demand of the bulky (23) For a diecussion of the chair/boat selectivity in related rearrangementa see refs 5c and 5j.

J. Org. Chem., Vol. 58, No. 23, 1993 6259

Enantioselective Synthesis of (-)-Trichodiene Scheme Va r

1

25

24

A (iii)

26 a

29

27

30

Reagents (i) MsC1, TEA, DMAP,CH&12,80%; (ii) LDA, TMSC1, TEA, THF, -110 OC; (iii) (a) reflux, 12 h; (b) HaO+; (c) CH2N2, EbO,

75%.

25a

25b

Chair-like conformalion

Boat-like conformation

J1 29

30

92

8

Figure 2. Reactive conformations for rearrangement of ketene silyl acetal 25.

methylcyclopentyl group in 29, for example, may be compared to a tert-butyl group (A-value for But = 5.7 kcal/mol" ). Hence, this substituent would be expected to occupy an equatorial position in,a chair conformation, as seen in 29a (eq 5). This in turn would compel the other

insufficient to counterbalance the large destabilization caused by the axial orientation of the methylcyclopentyl group in 29b. Therefore, the appearance of C(2)-H as a broad multiplet is consistent with its being equatorially oriented in the conformation that has the bulky group equatorial as well.26 This conclusion is borne out in the solid state, wherein the cyclohexane ring of 28 adopts a chair conformation in which the C(7)-C(8) bond is equatorial, hence, the C(1)-0(2) bond is axial and, in turn, C(l)-H, which corresponds to C(2)-H in 29,is equatorial. The complete reversal of facial selectivity in the isomerization of the ketene silyl acetals 21 and 25 as compared to that of the alkoxide enolate 9a is remarkable. The si selectivity observed for the latter substrate is in complete accord with the proclivity of Claisen rearrangement of conformationally rigid cyclohexyl systems to occur from the equatorial face (eq 1): and a rationale for departure from this in the acetals 21 and 25 is necessary. The most obvious explanation involves recognition of the fundamental structural differences in the two types of substrates. Namely, the strong chelation of Li+ ions by the alkoxide and enolate moieties of 9a promotes conformational rigidity in this intermediate and defines an equatorial disposition of the methyl and alkoxide groups; si selectivity of rearrangement is then expected. In contrast, 21 and 25,collectively represented as 31 (eq 6), QTMS

I

R A 318

zsa

298

three substituents to be axially oriented, even though an unfavorable l,&diaxial interaction between methoxy and methyl (a destabilization of about 1.9 kcal/molZ5) is present in such a conformation. This interaction, together with that for an ester group (A-value of 1.1 kcal/m01),2~is ~~~~~

~~

~~

(24) Dale, J. Stereochemistry and Conformational Analysis; Verlag Chemie: New York, 1978; pp 153-154. (25) Corey, E. J.; Feiner, N. F. J. Org. Chem. 1980,45, 765-780.

Me

)\ 1.3-diaxialinteraction

31 8

should be more mobile geometrically and presumably would allow accessto 31b,from which rearrangement could still occur from an equatorial face, but with re selectivity. The interconversion of 31a and 31b should have an energy of activation of less than 10 kcal/m01.~7Because this value is below the expected activation energy for the (26)MM2 calculations support the assumption that a chairlike conformation of 2Sa is preferred to either a boatlike or twiet-boat conformation. (27) Gerig, J. T.J. Am. Chem. SOC. 1968,90,1065-1066

6260 J. Org. Chem., Vol. 58, No.23, 1993

Gilbert and Selliah Scheme VIa

33

a Reagents:

34

12, NaHCOa, CHsCN, 78%; (ii) Zn, EtOH, reflux 96%; (iii) Swern oxidation.

[3,3]-sigmatropic rearrangement of simple ketene silyl acetals, which are reported to be in the range 15-20 kcal/ mol,% the Curtin-Hammett principle29 applies to the system. To account for the stereochemical outcome of the rearrangement, the activation barrier for isomerization by way of 31a,which would provide si facial selectivity, must be greater than that for 31b, the source of re selectivity. We believe that torsional strain is the primary factor that destabilizes the transition state for rearrangement through conformer 31a relative to that for 31b. Specifically, during the rearrangement of 31a from the more accessible si face, the developing carboxylate group becomes eclipsed with the equatorial OMe group, thus maximizing torsional strain.m Although a value for this strain cannot be readily estimated, the observed results would require that it be in the range of at least 1-2 kcal/ m01.3~ A second scenario provides a simpler, but, in the end, less probable way to explain the observed facialselectivity. This analysisstartswith the relatively unlikely assumption that the barrier to interconversion of 31 is greater than that for Claisen rearrangement of the two conformers. This circumstance would dictate that the observed products would reflect the ground-state population of the ketene acetal conformers.% Superficial analysis of the conformational equilibrium for 31 (eq 6) would appear to favor 31a,which has themethyl (Me) and methoxy (OMe) groups both equatorial and would lead to si selectivity. However, considerationof other possible intramolecular interactions makes it clear that the energy difference between the two chairlike conformations of the molecule may in fact favor 31b. The assessment relies on computational studies of methylenecyclohexanes, 32, in which conformer 32b is found to be favored by 2.0 kcal/mol (eq 7).32 The source of this preference is the A%train in 32a,which was shown to be 5.6-6.7 kcal/mol, as compared to the destabilization due to l,&diaxial interaction in 32b,which is reported to be 2.6 kcal/mol. Extrapolation of these findings to ketene (28) Gajewski, J. J.; Emrani, J. J. Am. Chem. SOC.1984,106,57335734. (29) For a review of conformational effects on reactivity and the role of the Curtin-Hammett principle in such situations, see: Seeman, J. I. Chem. Rev. 1983,83,83-134. (30) ChBreat, M.; Felkin, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1968, 22062208. (31) It ia recognized that development of the transition state for equatorial rearrangement of this conformation will potentially involve unfavorable steric hindrance caused by the axial OMe group; the axial Me group itaelf is unlikely to be a destabilizing factor for this transition state since it ia remote from the site of reaction. However, examination of the chairlike transition state for the equatorial rearrangement, with the aid of Dreiding models, indicates that this interaction would not be particularly severe. (32) Castello, A.; Jaime, C.; Marquet, J.; Moreno-Mafias, M. Tetrahedron 1985,41,3791-3802.

(7)

32a

32b

silyl acetals 31 (eq 6) implies that significant A%train should be present in the conformer 31a, due to the interaction of the OTMS group with the equatorial OMe group. The exact magnitude for this interaction cannot be inferred from the Alhtrain found in 32a because of the difference in substituents in the two systems, but it seems reasonable that it would be greater than the approximately 1 kcal/mol of destabilization estimatedB to be associated with the 1,3-diaxialinteraction between the Me and OMe groups in conformer 31b. In summary, we believe that a rationale for the difference in the facial selectivity seen with the alkoxide enolate and the ketene silyl acetals is found in the greater conformational mobility of the latter substrates and torsional factors associated with their rearrangement. Equatorial approach of the allyl moiety to the cyclohexane ring prevails in both types of intermediates. Finally,an important ramification of the re facial selectivity is that the trichodiene produced by the isomerization of 24,the absolute configuration of which is defined by (-)-7b,will be the unnatural antipode, ent-trichodiene, ((-1-1). The transformations required to complete the synthesis were all centered on the cyclohexane ring of the advanced intermediate 29 and involved creation of a double bond between C(3) and C(4), removal of the oxygen atom a t C(2), and reduction of the ester function to a methyl group. Deprotection of the methyl ether was the first task, and this was accomplished efficiently by subjecting 29 to the iodocyclization/reductivecleavage route shown in Scheme VI. The hydroxyolefin 34 was isolated as the only product of this sequence,as determined by 'H NMR spectroscopy. Attempted Oxidation of 34 under the standard Swern reaction conditions34failed to produce the keto ester 35; instead, the cyclization product 36 was isolated in high yield (Scheme VI). Since 36 was known to be the product of acid-catalyzed cyclizationof 29,sthis result was initially ascribed to the acidic nature of the reaction medium. (33) The l,&di&al interaction between OMe and Me in methylenecyclohexaneWBB estimated based on the reported decrease in Me-Me 1,3-diaxial interaction in going from cyclohexane (3.7 kcal/mols) to methylenecyclohexane (2.6 kcal/mola). The Me-OMe 1,g-diexial interaction in cyclohexane is reported to be 1.9 k d m o 1 . s (34) Mancuso, A. J.; Swam, D. Synthesis, 1981, 165-186.

J. Org. Chem., Vol. 58, No. 23, 1993 6261

Enantioselective Synthesis of (-)-Trichodiene Scheme VIP

28. R = OH

38

39

0) L 3 7 , R = OTs

(iv)

Me Me

OAc

Me

42

Me 41

40

43 a Reagente: (i) TeCl, pyr, rt, 95%; (ii) NaI, DME, DMPU, 85 OC, 76%; (iii) Zn, THF, pyr, EtOH, reflux; (iv) oxalyl chloride, DMSO, TEA, CHaCla, 88%;(v) LDA, THF, PhSeC1, -78 'C, then H202, CHzCl2, pyr, 45% (70% based on recovered 37); (vi) (a) DIBAL-H, toluene, 0 "C, (b) AcaO; pyr, rt, 63% (two steps); (vii) Li, EtNH2, THF, -78 "C,86% (combined yield).

44 via the reduction of the t o ~ y l h y d r a z o n e . ~ For l ~ *the ~~ Modified Swern conditions were later discovered under present case, the requisite tosylhydrazone derivative of which 34 could be oxidized to 35 efficiently, an indication 41 could not be prepared even under forcing conditions, that the formation of 36 was not due to the acidity of the a result that implicates the ester function in 44 as playing medium. Rather, the unexpected stability of 34 to the normal conditions for the Swern oxidation results in formation of 36 upon workup of the reaction mixture.36 The difficulties encountered with the oxidation of 34 led to development of a different approach for the Me M8 conversion of iodo ester 33 to trichodiene. Thus, the ester 44 group in 33 was reduced to the alcohol 28 (eq 41, which was transformed to diiodo compound 38 via the tosylate 37 a role in the formation of the tosylhydrazone. An alternate (Scheme VII). Refluxing a slurry of 38 and Zn in a solvent ~ to the desired reduction of 41 to (-1-1 was available, system composed of 95% EtOH, THF, and ~ y r i d i n e ~ ' ~ ~route however, by way of the metal-promoted reduction of allylic simultaneously reduced the C(2)-(iodomethyl)group and acetates.42 Toward this end, 41 was first reduced with reversed iodoetherification to give hydroxyolefin 39 as the DIBAL-H, and the resulting crude allylic alcohol was only isolable product. The crude product was immediately immediatelyacetylated to afford a diastereomericmixture oxidized according to standard Swern protocol34to afford ketone 40. This ketone was in turn converted to the enone of two acetates 42. Reduction of the acetates 42 with Li in ethylamine gave an 86% yield of a 2:l mixture of 41 (Scheme VII) according to the procedure of Reich et trichodiene and the thermodynamicallyless stable doublea1.39 bond isomer 43 (Scheme VII). The failure of the reaction The final step of the synthesis was excision of the enone to occur with the high regioselectivity engendered in the oxygen to give (-1-1. Ina previous synthesis of trichodiene, literature precedents is apparently the result of kinetic Gilbert and Kelly have reported that such a transformation protonation of the intermediate allyl anion, which expecould be effected in good yield in the closely related system riences severe steric hindrance at the secondary carbon (35) A sample of 29 in CDCh was found to cyclize to 36 when allowed ~ i t e . ~Pure 3 trichodiene was readily separated from this to stand overnight. mixture by chromatography on AgNO3-impregnatedsilica (36) A detailed analysis of this observation will be reported in due gel.6e The product had a 2 3-10~.0' (c = 0.2, CHC13) which course: Gilbert, J. C.; Selliah, R. Manuscript in preparation. (37) When the reductive cleavage of this compound was carried out in translates to 47% ee, given the literature value' of +21° 95 % EtOH some 30%of the undesired cyclizedproduct i was also formed. for the specific rotation of natural trichodiene (la);ita Incorporation of pyridine into the solvent system prevented this aide spectral data were identical to those of an authentic sample reaction. It ie likelythat Zn*+promotes some aggregationwhich facilitates the formation of i. Pyridine has been used in other instances to sequester of natural trichodiene. The sign of the rotation for the Znz+ ions.= synthetic material confirms that the Ireland ester-enolate Claisen rearrangement of 22 gives a product having the

&

I

(38)See, for example: Denis, J. M.; Girad, C.; Conia, J. M. Synthesis

1972,549-551. (39) Reich, H. J.; Renga, J. M.; Reich, I. C. J. Am. Chem. SOC.1975, 97,5434-5617.

(40) In light of the fact that reductions of this nature are known to proceed with migration of the double bond," our earlier report& appears to be in error with regard to the selectivity of the reduction. (41) Hutchins, R. 0.;Natale, N. R. J.Org. Chem. 1 9 7 8 , 4 9 , 2 S 2 3 0 1 and references cited therein. (42) Barrett,A. G. M.;Godfrey,C. R.A.;Hollinshead,D. M.;Prokopiou, P. A.; Barton, D. H. R.; Boar, R. B.; Joukhadar,L.; McGhie, J. F.; Misra, S. C. J.Chem. SOC.,Perkin Tram. 1 1981,1501-1509 and references cited therein.

6262 J. Org. Chem., Vol. 58, No. 23, 1993

absolute configuration of ent trichodiene. Furthermore, a 47% ee for the trichodiene thus prepared demands complete transfer of chiralityfrom (-)-7b,which was shown to be 45 f 2 % ee, as noted earlier. In conclusion the present work outlinesthe first chemical synthesis of an optically active trichodiene. The presently revealed facial selectivity of the Ireland-Claisen rearrangement that is the key step of this synthetic sequence would enable the preparation of the natural antipode of trichodiene in optically pure form if the &hydroxy ester (+)-7b were used as the starting material. T h e latter compound can be readily prepared by the chemical reduction of the known, chiral 0-ketoester 68 derived from (R)-3-methylcyclohexanone. The methodology described herein for the preparation of trichodiene has been successfully applied to the synthesis of optically active ent trichothecenes. The details will be reported in due course.44 Experimental Section Melting and boiling points were are uncorrected. Highpressure liquid chromatography was performed with two linked 2-ft X l/h-in. columns packed with LC Porasil (type A) silica gel. Unless otherwise noted, chromatography of product mixtures was effected by flash column chromatography over silica gel, according to the procedure described by Still et al." Title compounds were judged to be >95% pure by lH NMR spectroscopy. Unless otherwise noted, NMR spectra were obtained on samples in CDCla and IR spectra on thin films. Chloroform that had been passed through a short pad of activated basic alumina was used as solvent for optical rotations. All anhydrous reactions were performed under an inert atmosphere of dry N2 or Ar. All reaction vessels, syringes, and hypodermic needles used in these reactions were dried in an oven at 120 OC for at least 12 h and cooled under an atmosphere of N2 or in a desiccator. Solvents were dried by distillation, under an atmosphere of N2, using the drying agents,sodium benzophenone ketyl, for tetrahydrofuran (THF), or CaH2, for dichloromethane (CH&12), triethylamine (TEA), diisopropylamine, N,N'-dimethylpropyleneurea (DMPU), and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO); THF and CHzClz were used immediately after distillation, whereas the other solvents could be stored over 4A molecular sieves. Skelly-B was stirred over concd sulfuric acid for at least 24 h and then over sodium carbonate for 24 h, after which it was filtered and distilled. All other reagents and solvents were purified, as necessary, according to standard pr0cedures.a Alkyllithiums were titrated by the method of Suffert.'I Unless noted otherwise, concentration of solutions was accomplished by rotary evaporation at water aspirator pressures. Ethyl (lffcfS*,4S*)-2-Hydroxy-4-methylcyclohexanecarboxylate (7b). To a solution of 68 (5.6 g, 0.03 mol) in absolute ethyl alcohol (225 mL) was added NaBH4 (2.3 g, 0.04 mol). The resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h and then quenched by careful addition of 10 mL of 10% aqueous HC1. Solvent was removed under reduced pressure, and the residue was dissolved in 200 mL of ether and washed sequentially (43) Pearson et al. have reported that reduction of the diene ii with NalNHs gave 1 and 41 in a ratio variously reported 88 5lSfend 91,k both of which differ from the 2 1 ratio observed in the reduction of the acetates 40. This diecrepancy may reflect differences in the nature of ion pairing of the intermediate allyl anion formed in the two cases.

& Me II

(44) Gilbert, J. C.; Selliah, R. D. Tetrahedron, in press. (45) Still, W. C.; Khan, M.; Mitra, A. J. Org. Chem. 1978, 43, 29232925. (46) Perrin, D. D.; Armarego, W. L. F.; Perrin, D. R. Purification of Laboratory Chemicals, 2nd ed.; Pergamon: New York, 1980. (47) Suffert, J. J. Org. Chem. 1989,54, 50%510.

Gilbert and Selliah with H20, saturated NaHC08, and saturated NaC1. The organic layer was dried (MgSO4) and concentrated to obtain 5.3 g of a colorless liquid, GLC analysis of which showed the presence of three diastereomers in the ratio of 35:4520. The components were separated by HPLC (30% EtOAc/Skelly B), and 7b, the compound of intermediate polarity, was obtained as a colorless liquid with a sweatlike odor (2.13 g, 38% yield): bp 45-50 "C (Kugelrohr distillation, 0.05 Torr); IR 3450 (broad),1740 (e) cm-l; lH NMR (Cas, 500 MHz) 6 3.85 (m, 2H, 3.55 (dt, J = 10.7,4.5 Hz, lH), 3.46 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, lH), 2.72 (9, J = 4.1 Hz, lH), 2.05 (dq, J = 13.8, 3.5 Hz, lH), 1.85 (m, lH), 1.52 (9, J = 11.3, 11.6, 12.5 Hz, lH), 1.22 (m, lH), 1.19-1.08 (m, 2H), 0.95 (m, lH), 0.85 (t,J = 7.1 Hz, 3H), 0.80 (d, J = 6.5 Hz); 13C NMR (125 MHz) 6 174.52,70.81,60.35,45.32,40.53,31.46,30.57,26.68,21.94,14.16; HRMS (CI, CH4) mlz calcd for CloHleOs (M + H)+ 187.1334, found 187.1327. (-)-Ethyl (1R,25,45)-2-Hydroxy-4-methylcyclohexanecarboxylate [(-)-7b]. A procedure similar to that described by Frhter et a1.lIcwas used. A 2-L Erlenmeyer flask, equipped for magnetic stirring, was charged with dry, active bakers' yeast (50 g, Red Star,Universal Foods Corp.) and deionized water (500 mL), and the mixture was stirred vigorously to effect a homogeneous suspension. Sugar (75 g) was added, and the mixture was stirred for 30 min. At this time 6 (5.0 g, 27 mmol) was introduced to the rapidly foaming mixture, and stirring was continued for 48 hat 23 "C. Producta were isolated by extracting the aqueous reaction mixture with hexanes. The combined organic extracts were washed with brine until formation of an emulsion ceased (ca. 6-8 washes) and then dried (MgSO,). Removal of solvent gave a reddish brown liquid which was chromatographed (20% EtOAc/Skelly-B) togive unreacted ,%keto ester 6 (2.63 g, Rf 0.56, 52% yield) and @-hydroxyester (-)-7b (2.40 g, Rf 0.32) as a pale yellow liquid. Kugelrohr distillation of this oil (bp 45-50 "C, 0.05 Torr) gave (-)-7b (2.0 g, 40% yield) as a colorless liquid. Spectral data were identical with those ~ (c = l.O), corresponding to reported for racemic 7b: a 2 3-18.3" an ee of 45 k 2.16

(1R*fS*,45*)-2-Hydroxy-4-methyl-1-cyclohexanecarboxylic Acid (8). A mixture of 2.5 N aqueous LiOH (100 mL) and 7b (3.0 g, 16 mmol) in 100 mL of THF was stirred at room temperature for 24 h. The reaction mixture was then cooled to 0 "C, acidified to pH 2 with 6 N HC1, and subsequently warmed to RT and saturated with solid NaC1. The organic layer was separated, and the aqueous layer was extracted with ether. The combined organic layers were dried (MgSO4). Filtration and solvent removal gave a yellow liquid which was distilled to provide8 (2.5 g, 99% yield) as a clear, colorless viscous oil: bp 100-110 "C (Kugelrohr distillation, 0.05 Torr); IR 3200 (broad), 1720(s)cm-';lH NMRb3.82(m,lH),2.94 (m,lH),2.29 (m,lH), 1.89 (m, lH), 1.55-1.40 (m, 3H), 1.31 (m, lH), 1.05 (m, lH), 0.94 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR 6 177.79,70.73,44.81,40.37,31.39, 30.32,26.34,21.87; HRMS (CI, C&) mlz calcd for C&Il,Os (M+) 158.0943, found 158.0946. 3-Methyl-1-butenyl (lffcf~,4S*)-2-Hydroxy-4-methylcyclohexanecarboxylate (9). A dry 100-mLround-bottom flask was charged with 8 (0.68 g, 4.3 mmol), 3-methyl-2-buten-1-01 (0.80 g, 10 mmol), DMAP (0.12 g, 1.0 mmol), and dry CH2Cl2 (30 mL). The mixture was stirred and cooled to 0 "C under an inert atmosphere. A solution of dicyclohexyl carbodiimide (DCC, 1.02 g, 5.00 mmol) in CHzClz (10 mL) was added to the mixture slowly via cannula over a period of 5 min. The resulting mixture was stirred at 0 "C for 2 h, allowed to warm to room temperature, and stirred at that temperature for 18 h. The precipitate formed was removed by filtration, and the filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was dissolved in 50 mL of Skelly-B and filtered to remove solids, and the filtrate was then washed with 10% HC1, 10 mL of water, and brine and dried (MgSO4). Removal of solvent left a viscous oil which was chromatographed to afford 9 (0.57 g, 60% yield) as a clear liquid: Rf 0.34 (30% EtOAc/SkeUy-B);IR 3540 (m), 1735 (a) cm-l; lH NMR 6 5.33 (m, lH), 4.62 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 3.65 (m, lH), 3.47 (d, J = 10.5 Hz, lH), 2.87 (m, lH), 2.23 (m, lH), 1.91 (m, lH), 1.76 (a, 3H), 1.71 (s,3H), 1.56-1.25 (m, 4H), 0.92 (d, J = 6.2 Hz), 0.85 (m, 1H); 13C NMR 6 174.62, 139.46, 118.21, 70.78, 61.31,45.16, 40.47, 31.45, 30.51, 26.75, 25.69, 22.00, 10.02; HRMS (CI,CH4) mlz calcd for C13H2203 (M+) 226.1568, found 226.1577.

Enantioselective Synthesis of (-)-Trichodiene Methyl (1s*,!2s*,4s*) -2-Hydroxy-1-(2-methyl-3-butenyl ) 4-methylcyclohexanecarboxylate(10). A solution of lithium diisopropylamide (LDA, 2.50 mmol) in dry THF (10 mL) was prepared and cooled to -78 OC under an Ar atmosphere. The allyl ester 9 (0.23 g, 1.0 mmol) in THF (2.0 mL) was added to the cold solution. The resulting mixture was stirred at -78 OC for 0.5 hand then allowed to warm to room temperature and stirred at that temperature for a period of 60 h. A positive pressure of Ar was maintained throughout this time. The solution was then cooled to 0 OC and quenched by treatment with 10 mL of 10% HC1solution. The organic layer was separated, and the aqueous layer was extracted with ether. The combined organic extracts were washed with brine, which had been acidified to pH 2, and then dried (MgS04). The ethereal solution was filtered, concentratedtoabout lOmL,and treatedwithexcessetherealCHzN2. Workup of this mixture, in the manner outlined before, and concentration gave a yellow oil, which was subjected to flash chromatography (10% EtOAc/Skelly-B) to afford three components. The fastest moving component (Rf= 0.441, was found to be 11 (40 mg, 10% yield). The compound with intermediate = 0.36) was 10 (97 mg, 40% yield),which was obtained mobility (Rf as a colorless oil: IR 3550 (s), 3080 (w), 1735 (a), 1630 (w) cm-l; 1H NMR 6 6.11 (d, J = 17.4,lO.g Hz, lH), 4.95 (m, 2H), 3.72 (8, 3H), 3.60 (m, 2H), 2.12 (ddd, J = 13.6,3.2,3.2, lH), 1.87 (m, lH), 1.55 (m, lH), 1.38 (m, lH), 1.26-1.02 (m, 2H), 1.18, 1.12 (2 X 8, 2 X 3H), 0.85 (d, J = 6.3 Hz, 3H), 0.66 (dq, J = 12.0,2.9 Hz,1H); ~~CN~6176.24,145.45,112.32,74.52,51.20,43.46,41.15,32.50, 31.81,29:.46,25.01,24.20,21.65; HRMS (E11mlz calcdfor ClrHuO3 (M+) 240.1725, found 240.1712. Data for 3-methyl-2-butenyl (4S*)-4-methyl-l-cyclohexenecarboxylate (11):RfO.5;IR 1715(s), 1670 (w), 1650 (w);'H NMR 6 6.94 (m, lH), 5.34 (m, lH), 4.62 (d, J =7.1 Hz, 2H), 2.49-2.12 (m, 3H), 1.82-1.58 (m, 3H), 1.75 (8, 3H), 1.71 (8, 3H), 1.20 (m, lH),0.95 (d, J = 6.45 Hz, 3H);W NMR (CDCh)6 167.61,139.08, 138.50, 130.15, 118.96, 61.18, 34.14, 30.34, 27.57, 25.76, 24.18, 21.43,18.03; HRMS (EI) m / z calcd for ClaHmOz (M+)208.1463, found 208.1459. The slowest moving component (Rf0.2,20% EtOAc/SkellyB) to elute was a 1:lmixture of 9 and ita C-1 epimer (74 mg, 32% yield of mixture). Methyl (ls*,2s*ps*)-2-(3P-Dinitrobenzoyloxy)-l-(2-methyl-3-butenyl)-4-methyl-l-cyclohexanecarboxylate (12). A mixture of 10 (97 mg, 0.40 mmol), freshly purified 3,5-dinitrobenzoyl chloride (0.20 g, 1.0 mmol), and pyridine (2.0 mL) was stirred at room temperature for 48 h. The reaction mixture was diluted with 50 mL of ether and washed sequentially with 10% HC1, water, sat. NaHCOa and brine and dried (MgSO4). Filtration and solvent removal gave a yellow oil, which was purified by passage through a short column of silica gel (30% EtOAc/Skelly-B)to yield 12 (0.161g,93% yie1d)asawhitepowder. Crystalliition of this material from a 1:lmixture of 95 % EtOH/ CH&lg afforded pale yellow cubic crystals: mp 111.0-112.5 OC;

lHNMR69.23(8,3H),5.90(dd,J=17.3,10.8Hz,lH),5.14(dd,

J = 11.4,4.1 Hz, lH), 4.81 (m, 2H), 3.90 (s,3H), 2.37 (m, lH), 1.95 (m,lH), 1.65 (m, 2H), 1.42 (m, 2H), 1.09 (s,6H), 0.90 (d, J = 6.2 Hz, 3H), 0.85 (m, 1H);13C NMR 6 172.84,161.43,148.71,144.77, 134.58, 129.69, 122.25, 111.93, 77.25, 56.87, 51.41, 41.64, 38.27, 31.90,31.25,30.57,24.66,24.07,21.48;HRMS (EI) mlz calcd. for CpHazOa (M+) 434.1689, found 434.1686. (2-Methyl-l-cyclopentenyl)methy1(1R*,2s*,4s*)-2-Hydroxy-4-methyl-l-cyclohexanecarboxylate(13). Esterificawith 2-methyl-l-cyclopentenemethanol tion of 8 (2.66g, 16"01) (5, 2.26 g, 20 mmol),11 following the procedure described for preparation of 9, provided13 as a pale yellow oil after chromatography. Distillation of this oil afforded 1.73 g (43% yield) of pure 13 as a colorless liquid: Rf= 0.36 (30% EtOAc/Skelly-B); bp 110-120 "C (Kugelrohr distillation, 0.1 Torr); IR 3440 (s), 1720 ( 8 ) cm-l;lH NMR 6 4.67 (8, 2H), 3.62 (m, lH), 3.48 ( d , J = 10.4 Hz, lH), 2.87 (m, lH), 2.34 (m, 4H), 2.20 (m, lH), 1.76 (m, 3H), 1.70 (s,3H), 1.40 (m,4H), 0.91 (d, J = 6.2 Hz, 3H), 0.85 (m, 1H); l*C NMR6 174.66,138.95,129.34,70.79,60.99,45.20,40.51, 38.63,34.55,31.45,30.55,26.76, 22.01, 21.49,13.92; HRMS (CI, CHI) mlz calcd for Cl5HuOa (M+) 252.1725, found 252.1713. Rearrangement of Dianion Derived from 13. Ester 13 (0.25 g, 1.0 "01) was converted to 13a as a solution in THF (12.0 mL), utilizing the same procedure as that for forming 9a. This solution was heated at the reflux temperature in THF for 12 h.

J. Org. Chem., Vol. 58, No.23, 1993 6263 Workup and chromatography of the reaction mixture, according

to the method outlined for the rearrangement of 9, gavel6 (0.135 g, 58% yield) as B colorless oil. A mixture of 13 and ita C-1 epimer (47mg) was also eluted from the chromatography column. Data for (2-methyl-l-cyclopenteny1)methyl 4(S)-methyl-lcyclohexenecarboxylate (15): Rf= 0.56 (30% EtOAc/Skelly-B); IR 1710 (s), 1645 (w) cm-l; lH NMR 6 6.93 (m, lH), 4.67 (s,2H), 2.35 (m, 8H), 1.76 (m,5H), 1.70 (s,3H), 1.22 (m, lH), 0.96 (d, J = 6.3 Hz, 3H); l9C NMR 6 167.60,139.04,137.94,130.18, 130.02, 60.87,38.72,34.53,34.14,30.35,27.56,24.17,21.43,13.91;HRMS (CI, CHI) m/z calcd for Cl5HZOz (M+)234.1619, found 234.1616. Ethyl (iR,2S,49)-2-Met hoxy-4-methylcyclohexanecarboxylate (17). In a dry 100-mL round-bottom flask was placed KH (35% suspension in mineral oil, 2.40 g, 21.0 mmol) under an inert atmosphere. The oil was removed by washingwith hexanes, and the oil-free KH was suspended in dry THF (30 mL) and cooled to -20 OC. To this suspension was added CHJ (20.5 g, 145 mmol) and, after 5.0 min, a solution of the hydroxy ester (-)-7b (2.50 g, 13 mmol) in THF (5.0 mL); the resulting mixture was maintained at -20 OC for 2.0 h. The reaction was quenched by careful addition of 5.0 mL of a saturated NKCl solution. The resulting slurry was allowed to warm to room temperature and transferred to a separatory funnel,the organiclayer was separated, and the aqueous layer was extracted with ether. The combined organic layers were washed with water and brine, dried (Mgs04), and concentrated to give a yellow liquid. When subjected to chromatography (10% EtOAc/Skelly-B,RfO.40)the concentrate yielded 2.47 g of a colorless liquid as mixture of 17 and ita C-1 epimer 18 (8% of mixture), which were not separable by chromatographic methods (95% combined yield): lH NMR 6 (for 17)4.18 (m, 2H), 3.39 (s,3H),3.35 (m, lH), 3.00 (m, lH), 1.98 (m, lH), 1.72 (m, 2H), 1.46 (m, 2H), 1.24 (t, J =7.6 Hz, 3H), 0.97 (d, J = 6.3 Hz, 3H). (-)- (2&2S,4@-2-Met hoxy-4-met hylcyclohexanecarboxylic Acid( 19). A mixture of 15(2.0 g, 10.0mmol) and 4 N aqueous HCl(37 mL) was heated at gentle reflux for 6.0 h under a inert atmosphere. The mixture was then rapidly cooled in an ice-salt bath, and the cold reaction mixture was extracted with CHzClZ. The organic extracts were combined and dried (MgSOd),fiitered, and concentrated to afford a colorlessviscous liquid as a mixture of 19 and ita C-1 epimer (1.5 g, 88% combined yield, 92:8 ratio). Pure 19 was obtained as fine white needles by crystallization, at -20 OC, from an ethereal solution of the crude mixture: mp 49.551.0 "c;d 3 D -25.2' (c = 4.1); IR (CCL) 3100 (broad, m), 1738 (m), 1686 (8) cm-l; lH NMR 6 10.65 (broad, lH), 3.51 (s,3H),3.50 (m, lH), 2.92 (m, lH), 2.37 (ddd, J = 13.7,3.2 Hz, lH), 2.01 (m, lH), 1.41 (m, 3H), 1.08 (m, 2H), 0.94 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 3H); 18C NMR6174.40,79.81,56.42,42.54,36.17,30.96,29.86,25.59,21.81; HRMS (CI, CHI) mlz calcdfor C&,O3 (M+H)+173.1177, found 173.1179. (-)-(3-Methyl-2-butenyl) (lR$S,4S)-2-Methoxy-rl-methylcyclohexanecarboxylate (20). A solution of 19 (0.52 g, 3.0 mmol) in dry CHzClz (7.0 mL) was placed in a dry 25-mL roundbottom flask and cooled to 0 OC under an inert atmosphere. To this was added TEA (0.61 g, 6.0 mmol), and the mixture was stirred for 10min, at which time freshlydistilled methanesulfonyl chloride (MsC1,0.34 g, 3.0mmol)was added dropwisevia asyringe. The resulting mixture was stirred for 1h, and then a solution of 3-methyl-2-buten-1-01 (0.48 g, 6.0 mmol) and DMAP (70 mg, 0.60 mmol) in CHZClz (1.0 mL) was added. This mixture was stirred for 1.0 h at 0 OC and then allowed to warm to room temperature and stirred at that temperature for 16 h. The reaction mixture was diluted with 100 mL of ether and washed sequentially with 10% HCl, water, saturated NaHCOa, and brine. The ethereal solution was dried (MgSOI), filtered and concentrated to give a pale yellow oil, which upon chromatographic purification gave 20 (0.68 g, 95 % yield) as a colorless oil: Rf0.46 (20% EtOAc/Skelly-B);CPD -32O (c = 1.5); IR 1725 ( 8 ) cm-1; 1H NMR 6 5.33 (m,lH),4.57 ( d , J = 7.1Hz, 2H), 3.37 (s,3H), 3.34 (m, lH), 3.00 (q, J =4.3 Hz, lH), 1.95 (m, lH), 1.74 (m, 2H), 1.74 (s,3H), 1.70 (e, 3H), 1.44 (m, 4H), 0.98 (d, J = 6.2 Hz, 3H); NMR 6 173.18, 138.44, 118.87, 79.70, 60.87, 56.28, 42.53, 35.06, 30.72, 29.47, 25.90, 25.68, 21.86, 17.98; HRMS (CI, (2%) m/z calcd for Cl4HuOa (M+) 240.1725, found 240.1728. Procedure for the Irelandxlaisen Rearrangement of 8-Methoxy Allyl Esters. Formation of (+)-Methyl (1R,2S,4S)-l-(2-Methyl-3-butenyl)-2-methoxy-4-methylcy-

6264 J. Org. Chem., Vol. 58, No. 23, 1993 clohexanecarboxylate (23). Preparation of the Ketene Silyl Acetal Intermediate 21. The procedure used is a modified version of that published by Ireland et a1.12and was carried out under strictly anhydrous conditions. A solution of LDA (2.2 mmol) in THF (4.0 mL) was prepared and cooled to -110 OC under an inert atmosphere. To this was added via cannula the supernatant centrifugate of a solution of TMSCl/TEA/THF (3.0 mL of 2.00.53.7 volume ratio) which had been precooled to -78 "C. The resulting mixture was stirred for 2 min, and then a solution of 20 (0.24 g, 1.0 mmol) in THF (1.0 mL), precooled to -78 'C, was added dropwise via cannula over a period of 1min. This mixture was maintained at -110 'C for 10 min and then gradually allowed to warm to 0 OC. For spectroscopic analysis, the crude ketene acetal 21 could be isolated at this temperature as a solution in c a s as follows. The THF was removed from the reaction mixture under high vacuum (oil pump), and the residue was immediately suspended in dry C&. This suspension was rapidly filtered directly into an NMR sampletube through a tight cotton pad and was analyzed immediately. Partial 1H NMR spectral data for 21 are: 6 5.45 (m, lH), 4.30 (m, 2H), 3.58 (m, lH), 3.25 (e, 3H), 1.34 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H). Thermal Rearrangement of 21. For preparative purposes, the solution of 21 in THF was allowed to warm to room temperature and stirred at this temperature for 16h. The reaction mixture was diluted with 25 mL of ether and stirred with 5.0 mL of 5 % HCl for 10 min. The biphasic mixture was transferred to a separatory funnel, the organic layer was separated, and the aqueous layer was extracted with ether. The combined organic extracts were washed with 5 % HC1 solution and brine (acidified to pH 2) and dried (MgSOd). Filtration and removal of solvent left the crude carboxylic acid as yellow oil. This was purified by flash chromatography (20% EtOAc/Skelly-B, Rf 0.38) and immediatelyesterifiedwith an excess of ethereal CH2N2. Workup of this reaction mixture gave a pale yellow oil, which was purified by chromatography to afford 23 (0.19 g, 76% yield) as a colorless oil: Rf0.58 (20% EtOAc/Skelly-B);a% +17.8' (c = 3.2);IR 3080 (w), 1720 (e) cm-l; lH NMR 6 6.11 (dd, J = 17.3, 10.9 Hz, lH), 4.87 (m, 2H), 3.85 (m, lH), 3.62 (a, 3H), 3.26 (a, 3H), 1.98-1.55 (m,5H), 1.42 (m, lH), 1.21 (m, lH), 1.11(d, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H), 1.06, 1.05 (2 X a, 2 X 3H); 1sC NMR 6 174.33, 146.35, 110.41, 79.52, 56.52,55.13,50.67,41.90,29.51,28.89,25.79,24.82,22.62,20.19,

19.93; HRMS (EI) m/z calcd for ClaHzsOs (M+)254.1881, found 254.1868. (-)-(2-Methyl-l-cyclopentenyl)methyl(lWS,4@-2-Methoxy-4-methylcyclohexanecarboxylate (24). Esterification of 19 (2.0 g, 12.0 mmol) with 6 (1.72 g, 15.0 mmol), according to the procedure outlined for the preparation of 20, gave 24 (2.53 g, 80% yield) as a colorless liquid, after chromatography: Rf 0.56 (20% EtOAc/Skelly-B);(YmD -11.0' (c = 1.2); IR 1720 ( 8 ) cm-l; 1H NMR 6 4.62 (8, 2H), 3.35 (a, 3H), 3.32 (m, lH), 3.02 (4, J = 4.5 Hz, lH), 2.36 (m, 4H), 1.94 (m, lH), 1.82-1.38 (m, 8H), 1.68 (a, 3H), 0.97 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H); lacNMR 6 173.29, 138.10, 129.98,79.76,60.56,56.29,42.60,38.69,35.17,34.52,30.77,29.54, 25.95,21.88,21.58,13.91; HRMS (CI) m/z calcd for CleH2703 (M

+ H)+ 267.1960, found 267.1967.

Methyl (1&2S,4@-1-[ 1(R)-Methyl-2-methylenecyclopentenyl]-2-methoxy-4-methylcyclohexanecarboxylate (29) and Methyl (lR$S,4S)-l-[ l(S)-Methy1-2-methylenecyclopentenyl]-2-methoxy-4-methylcyclohexanecarboxylate(30). Ketene silyl acetal 25 derived from 24 (0.26 g, 1.0 mmol) was prepared according to part A of the general procedure outlined above. After the mixture had warmed to rt the reaction flask was fitted with a dry reflux condenser, and the mixture was refluxed for 12 h under an inert atmosphere. Quenching and workup followed the protocol for preparating 23. The ethereal solution of the rearranged acids was concentrated to an approximate volume of 1.0 mL, and the concentrate was purified by chromatography on silica gel. The column fractions containing the carboxylicacid (Rf0.37,20%EtOAc/Skelly-B)were combined and concentrated to a volume of about 10 mL, and this solution was treated with excess ethereal CH2N2. Workup in the usual manner and chromatography (20% EtOAc/Skelly-B,Rf 0.52) of the crude gave 29 and 30 (0.21 g, 75% combined yield) as an inseparable 92:8 mixture: lH NMR (C&&) 6 (partial spectrum for major isomer) 5.02 (m, lH), 4.72 (m, lH), 4.03 (m, lH), 3.33 (s,3H), 2.98 (a, 3H), 1.32 (a, 3H), 0.98 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H), minor

Gilbert and Selliah isomer has peaks at 6 5.30 (m, lH), 5.12 (m, lH), 4.11 (m, 1H); lac NMR (major isomer only) 6 174.50, 159.99, 106.46, 78.94, 57.60,55.37,50.74,50.00,38.38,36.88,29.37,29.15,26.25,25.73,

22.87, 20.62, 20.12. (-)-( lS,3S,7S,8R,llR)-7,1 l-Dimethyl-3-(iodomethyl)-8(methoxycarbonyl)-2-oxatricyclo[6.4.O.V~T]dodecane.The mixture of diastereomeric eaters 29 and 30 (94 mg, 0.33 "01) was dissolved in CHaCN (3.0 mL) and cooled to O°C under an inert atmosphere. To this were sequentiallyadded NaHCOs (0.22 g,2.65mmol) and12 (0.18g,0.69mmol),and theresultingmixture was stirred for 3.0 h at 0 'C. The reaction was quenched at the same temperature by sequential addition of 1.0-mL portions of water and saturated NaHCOa, followed by solid Na2S20~(0.5 9). The resulting slurry was extracted with ether, and the combined ether extracts were washed with water, 10% aqueous Na2S208, water, and brine and then dried (MgSO4). Solvent evaporation gave a yellow viscous oil, which was chromatographed to afford 31 (0.11g,83%yie1d)ascolorleesviscousoil: Rf0.43(15%EtOAc/ Skelly-B);#D-1.W (c = 3.8); IR 1725 (8) cm-l; 'H NMR (CDCh) 64.29(m, 1H),3.69 (s,3H),3.47,3.21(AB, JM =9.9Hz, 2H),2.14 (m, lH), 1.95-1.20 (m, 13H), 1.15 (a, 3H and d, 3H); lacNMR 8 174.07,90.08,74.00,57.97,56.01,51.55,42.~,39.71,30.61,28.56, 25.13,23.29,21.74,19.98,17.36,16.08; HRMS (EI) m/z calcd for

ClsHBOsI (M+) 392.0848, found 392.0853. (-) -(1S,3S,7S,8S,llS)-7,ll-Dhyl-8imet(hydroxymet hy 1)3-(iodomethyl)-2-oxatricyclo[6.4.0.V~T]dodecane(28). The iodo ester from above (0.78 g, 2.0 mmol) was dissolved in dry toluene (25 mL) in a dry 100-mL round-bottom flask, and the solution was cooled to 0 "C under an inert atmosphere. To this was added DIBAL-H (6.0 mL, 1.0 M in toluene) dropwise over a period of 5 min, and the resulting mixture was stirred at 0 "C for 5 h. The reaction was quenched by carefully adding to it 20 mL of a saturated solution of sodium potassium tartrate, and the resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature for 3 h. The organic layer was separated, and the aqueous layer was extracted with ether. The combined organic layers were dried (MgSO,) and concentrated to leave a pale yellow, waxy solid that was purified by chromatography to give 27 (0.71 g, 99% yield) as a white crystalline solid. Crystallization from 1:l EhO/CHzC12 provided colorless plates: Rf 0.22 (30% EtOAc/Skelly-B); mp 134.5-137 'c; a m D -3.6 (C = 1.00); IR (Ccb) 3450 (m, broad) cm-1; 1H NMR 6 3.75 (m, lH), 3.62 (m, 2H), 3.57, 3.22 (AB, JAB = 9.9 Hz, 2H, CH2-I),2.10 (m, 2H), 1.83 (m, 2H), 1.75-1.30 (m, lOH), 1.17 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H), 1.10 (a, 3H); l9C NMR 6 89.84, 74.96,62.22, 57.27,48.73,42.65,38.22,31.05,26.80,25.38,23.43, 20.52,19.16,18.81,17.51; HRMS (CI, (2%) m/z calcd for C~BHZSO~I (M + H)+ 365.0977, found 365.0977. (-)-( lS,3S,7S,SS,11@-7,1 l-D)imethyl-b(iodomethyl)-gE[ (p toluenesulfonyl)oxy]methyl]-2-oxatricycl0[6.4.0.0*~~]dodecane (37). A mixture of alcohol 28 (0.60 g, 1.6 mmol) and p-toluenesulfonyl chloride (1.02 g, 3.28 mmol) in pyridine (10 mL) was stirred at room temperature for 48 h under an inert atmosphere. The pyridine was removed under reduced pressure, and the residue was dissolved in ether and washed sequentially with water, saturated CuSO4, water, and brine. The ethereal solution was dried (MgS04),and solvent was removed to yield a pale yellow solid that was purified by chromatography to give 35 (0.81 g, 95% yield) as a white crystalline solid. Crystallization from a 1:lmixture of ether/Skelly-B gave white needles: Rf0.28 (30% EhO/Skelly-B); mp 139.0-141.5 'C; a% -0.65' (c = 1.7); 1 H NMR (500 MHz) 6 7.75 ( d , J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 7.33 ( d , J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 4.07,3.87 (AB, JM= 10.0 Hz, 2H), 3.60 (m, broad, lH), 3.47,3.16 (AB,JM= 10.0Hz, 2H), 2.43 (s,3H), 2.11 (m, lH), 1.78 (m, 3H), 1.58 (m, 3H), 1.46 (m, 3H), 1.39 (m, 2H), 1.27 (m,lH), 1.10 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H), 1.02 (e, 3H); lSC NMR (125 MHz) 6 144.94, 132.54, 129.88, 127.86, 90.23, 74.08, 69.38, 57.05, 47.56, 42.38,37.95,30.82,26.30,25.06,23.28,21.65,20.43,19.21,18.19,

16.69; HRMS (CI, CHI) m/z calcd for CBH~~OISI (M + H)+ 519.1066, found 519.1061. (-)-( 1S,3S,7S,8R,115)-7,1l-Dimet hyl-3,8-bis(iodomethy1)2-oxatricyclo[6.4.0.V~T]dodecane(38). A solution of NaI (1.94 g, 13.0 mmol) and 37 (0.81 g, 1.56 mmol) in a 1:l mixture of DME/DMPU (20 mL) was heated to 85 C ' and stirred under an inert atmosphere for 6.0 h. The mixture was cooled to room temperature, and the solvent was removed. The residue was dissolved in ether and washed with water, 10% N ~ ~ S ~and OS, water, followed by a final wash with brine. The ethereal solution

J. Org. Chem., Vol. 58, No.23, 1993 6265

Enantioselective Synthesis of (-)-Trichodiene was dried (MgSO4) and concentrated to afford a yellow solid that on chromatography gave 38 (0.66 g, 76% yield) as a white amorphoussolid Rf0.46 (10% EtOAc/Skelly-B);mp 138.0-140.0 "C; amD-29.2" (C = 2.4); 'H NMR (500 MHZ) 6 3.71 (m, lH), 3-49? 3.20 (AB, JAB= 10.7 Hz, 2H), 3.30,3.19 (AB, JAB= 9.9 Hz, 2H), 2.15 (m, lH), 1.88 (m, 3H), 1.73-1.45 (m, broad, 9H), 1.15 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H), 1.09 (a, 3H); l3C NMR (125 MHz) 6 90.82, 76.25, 57.38,45.97,42.35,37.65,30.37,26.33,25.28,23.31,23.03,20.54, 17.48, 17.11,8.85; HRMS (CI, C&) mlz calcd for C16H2sO12(M H)+ 474.9994, found 474.9982. (lS,2S,5s)-2,5-Dimethyl-2-[ (lR)-l-methyl-2-methylenecyclopentyl]cyclohexan-l-ol(39). A mixture of 36 (0.10 g, 0.21 mmol), Zn dust (0.22 g, 3.38 mmol), and pyridine (1.0 mL) in 4:l mixture (v/v) of THF:95% EtOH (10 mL) was heated at reflux for 20 h under an inert atmosphere. The reaction mixture was cooled and filtered through a short pad of activated basic alumina. The filter cake was washed with EtOAc, and the washings were combined with filtrate. Compound 37 was obtained as a viscous oil upon concentration of the filtrate and was used immediately in the oxidation step: lH NMR (CJIa) 6 (partial) 5.02,4.89 (m, 2H), 3.71 (m, lH), 1.22 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H), 1.09 (a, 3H, CHa),0.79 (8, 3H). (-)-(2S,5S)-2,5-Dimethy1-2-[ (lR)-l-methyl-2-methylenecyclopentyl]cyclohexan-l-one(40). A dry 5-mL round-bottom flask, equipped for magnetic stirring, was charged with dry CHzCl9 (1.5 mL) and freshly distilled oxalyl chloride (0.04 g, 0.30 "01) and cooled to-78 "C under an inert atmosphere. A solution of DMSO (0.05 mL, 0.58 mmol) in dry CHzClZ (0.50 mL) was added to the reaction flask dropwise via a syringe. After this mixture was stirred for 2 min, a solution of the crude 39 obtained above, in dry CHzClz (0.5 mL), was added to it dropwise via cannula. The resulting cloudy solution was stirred for 15 min at -78 "C, at which time triethylamine (0.75 mL) was added. The white slushlike mixture was stirred for an additional 15 min at the same temperature and then allowed to warm to room temperature. The reaction was quenched with 1mL of 1% HCl, and the mixture was extracted with ether. The organic layers were combined, washed with 1%HC1, water, and saturated NaHCOs, and dried (KzCO3). Solvent removal gave a yellow liquid that upon chromatography yielded 40 (41 mg, 88% yield from 37) as a clear colorless oil: Rf 0.30 (5% EtOAc/Skelly-B); (YmD -68.2" (c = 2.2); IR 3045 (w), 1710 (a), 1640 (m) cm-l; 1H NMR 6 4.96, 4.84 (2 X m, 2 X lH), 2.50 ( d d , J = 13.3,5.4, lH), 2.31-2.01 (m, 5H), 1.94 (m, 2H), 1.72-1.33 (m, 5H), 1.20 (a, 3H), 1.16 (a, 3H), 0.96 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H); lSCNMR 6 216.50, 160.10, 106.95,53.29,49.37,47.36,38.33,30.04,29.47,27.11,25.07,23.33, 20.71, 19.29; HRMS (CI, CH4) mlz calcd for C16Hu0 (M+) 220.1827, found 220.1825. (-)-(2@-2,5-Dimethyl-2-[(lR)-l-methyl-2-methylenecyclopentyl]cyclohex-5-en-lone(41).To asolution of LDA (0.28 mmol) in dry THF (3.0 mL) at -78 "C and under an inert atmosphere was added a solution of the ketone 40 (41 mg, 0.19 mmol) in THF (1.0 mL). After 0.5 h, a solution of phenylselenenyl chloride (40 mg, 0.20 mmol) in THF (0.5 mL) was added to the solution of enolate via cannula. The mixture was stirred for an additional 0.5 h at -78 "C and then quenched at the same temperature with 0.5 mL of a 1% HCl solution. The reaction mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature and then partitioned between ether and water. The organic layer was separated and dried (MgSO4). Removal of solvent gave a yellow residue, which was dissolved in 5 mL of CHzClz and treated with 2 mL of a 1:l mixture of 30% HzOz and water in the presence of 0.5 mL of pyridine. The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 45 min, after which the organic layer was separated and the aqueous layer was extracted with CHzC12. The organic extracts were combined and dried (MgSO4). Concentration gave a yellow oil that was chromatographed to afford 41 (18 mg, 72% yield based on recovered 40) as a colorless liquid; unchanged ketone 40 (16 mg) was also eluted from the column: ~ (c = 1.0);IR 3050 (w), Rf0.20 ( 5 % EtOAc/Skelly-B);( r m -28.2" 1665 (a), 1640 (shoulder, m) cm-1; 1H NMR 6 5.69 (a, lH), 4.91,

+

4.81 (2 x m, 2 X lH), 2.42-1.95 (m, 6H), 1.88 (a, 3H), 1.75 (m, 2H), 1.64 (m, 2H), 1.42 (m, lH), 1.32 (e, 3H), 1.19 (a, 3H); lSC NMRG 204.12,160.65,158.90,127.20,106.17,49.40,48.46,38.95, 38.40, 30.31, 28.36, 26.04, 23.71, 23.39, 17.41; HRMS (CI, C&) mlz calcd for ClaHmO (M H)+ 219.1748, found 219.1735. ( 1SJR)%-Acetoxy- 1,4-dimethyl- 1-[(1B)-l-methyl-2-methylenecyclopentyl]cyclohex-3-ene and (lS,2S)-2-Acetoxy- 1,4dimethyl-1-[(1R)- l-methyl-2methylenecyclopentyl]cyclohex3-ene (42). To a solution of 41 (16 mg, 0.073 mmol) in dry toluene (3.0 mL) at 0 "C was added DIBAL-H (0.3 mL, 1.0 M in toluene). The resulting mixture was stirred at the same temperature for 0.5 h and then transferred to a refrigerator (0-5 "C) and kept unstirred for 12 h under an inert atmosphere. The reaction was quenched at 0 "C by careful addition of 30 pL of CHsOH and allowed to warm to room temperature. The mixture was diluted with ether, and brine was added dropwise until precipitation occurred. A small amount of anhydrous KzCOs was added to the mixture, which was then filtered through a pad of activated basic alumina into TEA (0.5 mL). The filter cake was washed with ether, and the washes were combined with the filtrate. The filtrate was dried (K2COs) and concentrated to give a cloudy oil. This was immediately dissolved in 1mL of pyridine and treated with 0.5 mL of acetic anhydride. This mixture was stirred for 48 h at room temperature under an inert atmosphere, diluted with ether, and then washed with saturated CuSO4, water, brine and dried (MgSO,). Concentration provided a yellow oil, which was chromatographed to afford 42 (12 mg, 63 % yield from enone 41) as a 6 1 mixture of diastereomers: 'H NMR (for major isomer) 6 5.53 (m, lH), 4.98,4.68 (2 X m, 2 X lH), 2.01 (a, 3H), 1.67 (a, 3H), 1.07 (a, 3H), 0.92 (a, 3H); l3C NMR (for major isomer) 6 170.49, 159.91,139.21, 119.64, 107.68,73.00,49.85, 39.87,38.51, 38.06, 28.16, 25.90, 23.28, 23.11, 21.76, 18.07; HRMS (CI, CHI) mlz calcd for C17H2102 (M+) 262.1945, found 262.1932. (-)-Trichodiene [(-)-11. Approximately 5.0 mL of EtNHz, dried over KOH pellets, was distilled into a three-neck flask equipped with a dry ice cold fiiger and cooled to -78 OC. To this was added Li wire (15 mg, 2.2 mmol) as small pieces. When a blue color developed,the mixture of allyl acetates 42 (12 mg, 0.05 mmol) in THF (1.0 mL) was added to it, and the resulting solution was stirred for 15 min. The reaction was then quenched at -78 "C by addition of 0.5 mL of CHsOH, diluted with ether, and allowed to warm to room temperature. The resulting mixture was decanted into a separatory funnel, washed with water, and dried (MgSO4). Concentration gave a colorlessliquid, which was purified by passage through a short column of silica gel with Skelly-B as the eluent (Rf0.68). This afforded a 2:l mixture of (-1-1, and its C-1 olefin isomer 43 (8.0 mg, 86% combined yield), as a colorless oil. The mixture was chromatographed on silver nitrate-impregnated silica gel (12.5 wt % AgNOa) with Skelly-B as eluent to yield trichodiene (-)-1(4.0 mg) as acolorless oil: (YmD -10.0' (c = 0.2); IR 3060 (w), 1640 (w) cm-l; lH NMR 6 5.29 (m, lH), 4.96,4.73 (2 X m, 2 X lH), 2.38-2.12 (m, 2H), 2.06-1.80 (m, 4H), 1.76-1.55 (m, 2H), 1.64 (8, 3H), 1.48-1.30 (m, 4H), 1.03 (a, 3H), 0.85 (a, 3H); HRMS (EI) mlz calcd for C1d-€u(M+)204.1878, found 204.1881.

+

Acknowledgment. Financial support for this research by the Robert A. Welch Foundation (Grant F-815) is gratefully acknowledged. We thank Dr. Vincent Lynch for carrying out the X-ray structural analysesand Professor David Cane for providing an authentic sample of (+)-

trichodiene. Supplementary Material Available: ORTEP structures for compounds 12 and 28 and 1H-NMR spectra of (+l, rac-7b, rac-9, rac-lo, rac-11, rac-13, 23, 27, 29 and 30, 31, 37, 38, and 40-42 (19 pages). This material is contained in libraries on microfiche, immediately follows this article in the microfilm version of the journal, and can be ordered from the ACS; see any current masthead page for ordering information.