Enzymatic Synthesis of Structured Monogalactosyldiacylglycerols

Jul 12, 2018 - The structured MGDGs were separated from the reaction products at a ... (1) Therefore, MGDGs can act as nonionic emulsifiers in food pr...
0 downloads 0 Views 1MB Size
Subscriber access provided by UNIV OF NEW ENGLAND ARMIDALE

Biotechnology and Biological Transformations

Enzymatic Synthesis of Structured Monogalactosyldiacylglycerols Enriched in Pinolenic Acid Jiwon Kim, Min-Yu Chung, Hee-Don Choi, In-Wook Choi, and Byung Hee Kim J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b02599 • Publication Date (Web): 12 Jul 2018 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on July 13, 2018

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 29

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

1

Enzymatic Synthesis of Structured Monogalactosyldiacylglycerols Enriched in

2

Pinolenic Acid

3

Jiwon Kim,† Min-Yu Chung,‡ Hee-Don Choi,‡ In-Wook Choi,‡ and Byung Hee Kim*,§

4



Department of Food Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong 17546, Korea

5



Korea Food Research Institute, Jeonbuk 55365, Korea

6

§

Department of Food and Nutrition, Sookmyung Women’s University, Seoul 04310, Korea

7 8

Short title: Enzymatic Synthesis of MGDGs Enriched in Pinolenic Acid

9 10

* Corresponding author.

11

Byung Hee Kim*

12

Department of Food and Nutrition, Sookmyung Women’s University, Seoul 04310, Korea

13

Tel.: + 82 220777241

14

Fax: + 82 27109479

15

E-mail address: [email protected]

16

1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 2 of 29

17

ABSTRACT: We enzymatically prepared structured monogalactosydiacylglycerols (MGDGs)

18

enriched in pinolenic acid (PLA). PLA-enriched free fatty acids (FFAs) containing ~86 mol %

19

PLA were produced from an FFA fraction obtained from pine nut oil (PLA content, ~13 mol %)

20

by urea crystallization. Commercial MGDGs (5 mg) were acidolyzed with PLA-enriched FFAs

21

using four commercial immobilized lipases as biocatalysts. The reaction was performed in

22

acetone (4 mL) in a stirred-batch reactor. Lipozyme RM IM (immobilized Rhizomucor miehei

23

lipase) was the most effective biocatalyst for the reaction. Structured MGDGs containing 42.1

24

mol % PLA were obtained under optimal reaction conditions: temperature, 25 °C; substrate

25

molar ratio, 1:30 (MGDGs:PLA-enriched FFAs); enzyme loading, 20 wt % of total substrates;

26

and reaction time, 36 h. The structured MGDGs were separated from the reaction products at a

27

purity of 96.6 wt % using silica column chromatography. The structured MGDGs could be

28

possibly used as emulsifiers with appetite-suppression effects.

29

KEYWORDS:

30

monogalactosyldiacylglycerols, pinolenic acid, structured lipids

Acidolysis,

appetite

suppressants,

emulsifiers,

31 32

2 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Lipozyme

RM

IM,

Page 3 of 29

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

33

INTRODUCTION

34

Monogalactosyldiacylglycerols (MGDGs) are glycoglycerolipids that contain one

35

galactopyranosyl residue (predominantly in beta-form), which is linked to the sn-3 position of

36

1,2-diacylglycerols.1 Naturally occurring MGDGs are mainly found in the thylakoid membrane

37

within the chloroplasts of higher plants and occupy half of the chloroplast lipids, thereby

38

indicating that MGDGs are the most abundant polar lipids on Earth.1,2 MGDGs are also found in

39

other photosynthetic organisms, such as algae and fungi.3 Dietary MGDGs can help control body

40

weight by inhibiting the activity of pancreatic lipase.4 Because dietary MGDGs are hydrolyzed

41

by pancreatic lipase, they may compete with dietary triacylglycerols for hydrolysis of pancreatic

42

lipase in the duodenum, thereby helping to delay digestion and absorption of triacylglycerols.4

43

Undigested triacylglycerols in the ileum from delayed triacylglycerol digestion induce the

44

secretion of gut satiety hormones, which slow gastric emptying and suppress appetite.5 MGDGs

45

exhibit surface or interfacial active properties because they are amphiphilic molecules that

46

contain a galactose moiety, which is a polar and uncharged head group.1 Therefore, MGDGs can

47

act as non-ionic emulsifiers in food products. Several researchers have attempted to utilize

48

MGDGs as emulsifiers to inhibit fat bloom in chocolate or to enhance the baking performance

49

(e.g., loaf volume and crumb structure) of bread.6,7

D-

50

Pinolenic acid (PLA; c5,c9,c12-18:3) is a ∆5-unsaturated polymethylene-interrupted fatty acid

51

(FA). It is exclusively found in the oils of edible seeds (i.e., nuts) of pines, such as Korean pine

52

nut (Pinus koraiensis; PLA content = ~14 mol %) or Siberian pine nut (P. sibirica; PLA content

53

= ~19 mol %).8 Pine nut oil containing PLA or PLA itself is effective to reduce body weight

54

because PLA provides an appetite-suppression effect that is derived from the increased secretion

55

of gut satiety hormones, such as cholecystokinin-8 and glucagon-like peptide-1 in humans.8 3 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

56

Structured lipids are lipids in which the composition and/or positional distribution of FAs have

57

been modified from their natural biosynthetic form.9 Structured lipids can be synthesized

58

chemically or enzymatically. Enzymatic synthesis of structured lipids using lipases as

59

biocatalysts has several advantages over chemical methods because the enzymatic process

60

reduces by-product formation, requires mild reaction conditions, and does not use deleterious

61

chemicals.9 Furthermore, it is easy to recover the products and to reuse the lipases, which is

62

environmentally friendly and economically feasible, when immobilized lipases are used.9 In the

63

lipase-catalyzed synthesis of structured lipids, acidolysis (the transfer of an acyl group between

64

an acid and an ester) is one of the most effective means of incorporating targeted free FAs (FFAs)

65

into lipids.10 In this study, we prepared structured MGDGs enriched in PLA using an

66

immobilized lipase-catalyzed acidolysis of MGDGs with PLA-enriched FFAs obtained from pine

67

nut oil. The structured MGDGs could be used as a new type of non-ionic emulsifier with

68

appetite-suppression effects because they are expected to have the physicochemical and

69

biological features of both MGDGs and PLA. Several recently published studies have attempted

70

to synthesize structured lipids enriched in PLA, in the form of triacylglycerols11-13 or

71

monoacylglycerols14 via lipase-catalyzed reaction, such as acidolysis11 or esterification.12-14

72

However, no reports have examined the existence or preparation of MGDGs containing PLA.

73

The aim of this study was to enzymatically prepare structured MGDGs enriched in PLA for

74

potential use as emulsifiers with appetite-suppression effects. The structured MGDGs were

75

synthesized from commercial MGDGs and PLA-enriched FFAs from pine nut oil by lipase-

76

catalyzed acidolysis. The reaction was performed in acetone in a stirred-batch reactor. We

77

evaluated the catalytic activity of four commercially available immobilized lipases. For a

78

selected lipase, the effects of temperature, substrate molar ratio, and enzyme loading on the PLA 4 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 4 of 29

Page 5 of 29

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

79

content in the structured MGDGs were investigated; optimal reaction conditions to prepare

80

MGDGs with a maximum PLA content were suggested by considering the economic feasibility

81

of our reaction system. Finally, we suggested a purification procedure to separate the structured

82

MGDGs from the reaction products.

83 84

MATERIALS AND METHODS

85

Materials. Pine nut oil (PLA content = 13.7 mol %) was obtained from Komega Co.

86

(Eumseong, Korea). Commercial MGDGs (purity >99 wt %) were purchased from Avanti Polar

87

Lipids, Inc. (Alabaster, AL). Immobilized lipases from Rhizomucor miehei (Lipozyme RM IM),

88

Thermomyces lanuginosus (Lipozyme TL IM), and Candida antarctica (Novozym 435) were

89

purchased from Novozymes A/S (Bagsværd, Denmark). Candida rugosa lipase (immobilized on

90

Immobead 150) was purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO). Urea (purity >99

91

wt %) and dodecan-1-ol (purity >98 wt %) were purchased from Samchun Pure Chemical Co.

92

(Pyeongtaek, Korea). Silica gel-coated glass plates for thin layer chromatography (TLC) were

93

purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). The FA methyl ester (FAME) standards were

94

obtained from Supelco (Bellefonte, PA). All other reagents were of analytical or high-

95

performance liquid chromatography grade.

96

Preparation of PLA-Enriched FFAs from Pine Nut Oil. PLA-enriched FFAs were obtained

97

from pine nut oil by saponification followed by urea crystallization of the FFAs from the oil,

98

according to the method described by Woo et al.12 with a slight modification. Pine nut oil (100 g)

99

was saponified with 400 mL of 10 wt % NaOH in 75 vol% ethanol. Distilled water (200 mL) was

100

added to the saponified mixture, and the resulting aqueous layer was acidified by adding 250 mL

101

of 6 N HCl. n-Hexane (500 mL) and distilled water (300 mL) were added, and the aqueous layer 5 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

102

was removed using a separatory funnel; the n-hexane layer containing the FFAs was washed five

103

times with 100 mL of distilled water. The n-hexane layer was dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, and

104

n-hexane was removed using a rotary vacuum evaporator at 40 °C. Then, the obtained FFAs (50

105

g) and urea (200 g) were dissolved in 500 mL of methanol, and the solution was refluxed at

106

250 °C until the urea dissolved completely. The solution was cooled to room temperature (23 °C)

107

at a rate of ~2.5 °C/min and held at this temperature for 30 min. The solution was then held at

108

4 °C for 16 h to crystallize the urea–FFA complex. The crystals that formed in the solution were

109

removed by filtration through Whatman No. 1 filter paper in a Buchner funnel. Methanol was

110

removed from the filtrate using a rotary vacuum evaporator at 40 °C, and the remaining filtrate

111

was acidified with 300 mL of hot (~70 °C) 0.1 N HCl. The uncrystallized portion of the FFAs

112

was recovered by extracting the acidified filtrate with 500 mL of n-hexane twice in a separatory

113

funnel. The n-hexane layer was washed twice with 100 mL of water and dried over anhydrous

114

Na2SO4. n-Hexane was removed using a rotary vacuum evaporator at 40 °C to obtain the PLA-

115

enriched FFAs, which were then stored at −80 °C.

116

Enzymatic Preparation of Structured MGDGs Enriched in PLA. To prepare structured

117

MGDGs enriched in PLA, acidolysis was performed in acetone for commercial MGDGs with the

118

PLA-enriched FFAs obtained from pine nut oil using Lipozyme RM IM as the biocatalyst

119

(Figure 1). The reaction was performed in a flat-bottom glass vessel (15 cm × 5 cm internal

120

diameter (i.d.)) equipped with a water jacket for temperature control. The vessel was maintained

121

at the desired temperature (25, 30, 35, and 40 °C) using a water circulator (model RW-0252G,

122

Jeio Tech, Seoul, Korea). The substrates contained 5 mg of MGDGs and 18.7, 37.3, 56.0, or 74.7

123

mg of the PLA-enriched FFAs (corresponding to molar ratios of 1:10, 1:20, 1:30, and 1:40,

124

respectively). After dissolving the substrates in 4 mL of acetone, the desired amounts (5, 10, 15, 6 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 6 of 29

Page 7 of 29

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

125

and 20 wt % of the total substrates) of Lipozyme RM IM were added, and the reaction mixture

126

was agitated at 8.3 Hz using a magnetic stirrer during the reaction.

127

Separation of Structured MGDGs from Reaction Products Using TLC. Samples (0.2 mL)

128

of the reaction products were withdrawn from the reaction mixture at appropriate time intervals

129

(i.e., 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 h) during the reaction. The samples were dissolved in 2 mL of a

130

mixture of chloroform and methanol (1:2, v/v) and filtered through a 0.45-µm hydrophilic

131

polypropylene membrane filter with an anhydrous Na2SO4 layer on top to remove the enzyme.

132

After completely drying the filtrates under a nitrogen flush, they were re-dissolved in 0.2 mL of

133

chloroform and methanol (1:2, v/v), placed on a TLC plate, and then developed with

134

chloroform/methanol/water/ethyl acetate/2-propanol (50:20:10:50:50, v/v/v/v/v). The plate was

135

air-dried and sprayed with 0.2% 2,7-dichlorofluorescein in methanol, and the bands were

136

visualized under ultraviolet light. The band corresponding to the MGDGs was scraped from the

137

plates.

138

Analysis of the FA Composition. We analyzed the total FA compositions of pine nut oil,

139

FFAs of pine nut oil, PLA-enriched FFAs obtained from the FFAs of pine nut oil, commercial

140

MGDGs, and structured MGDGs separated from reaction products following the method

141

described by Kang et al.15 Lipid samples (20 mg) or MGDG bands scraped from the TLC plates

142

were saponified with 3 mL of 0.5 N NaOH in methanol at 85 °C for 10 min and cooled to room

143

temperature (23 °C). After methylating the saponifiable lipids with 3 mL of 14% BF3 in

144

methanol at 85 °C for 10 min, the mixture was cooled to room temperature, 3 mL of isooctane

145

and 5 mL of a saturated NaCl solution were added, and the mixture was vortexed. The upper

146

isooctane layer containing the FAMEs was collected and passed through an anhydrous Na2SO4

147

column. The FAMEs were analyzed by gas chromatography using an Agilent Technologies 7 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 8 of 29

148

7890A gas chromatograph (Palo Alto, CA) equipped with a flame ionization detector and a fused

149

silica column (SP-2560, 100 m × 0.25 mm i.d. × 0.2-µm film thickness, Supelco). A FAME

150

sample (1 µL) was injected in split mode with a split

151

20:1). Helium was used as the carrier gas at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. The injector and detector

152

temperatures were maintained at 225 and 285 °C, respectively. The oven temperature was held at

153

100 °C for 4 min, increased to 240 °C at a rate of 3 °C/min, and finally held at 240 °C for 17 min.

154

The FAMEs were identified by comparing their retention times with those of the standards, and

155

their contents (mol %) were calculated.

ratio of 200:1 (for MGDG analysis,

156

Purification of Structured MGDGs from the Reaction Products Using Column

157

Chromatography. Structured MGDGs enriched in PLA was purified from the reaction products

158

obtained under optimal conditions using silica column chromatography. After packing a slurry of

159

silica gel (5 g) and hexane/diethyl ether (60:40, v/v) into the glass column (30 mm × 3 mm i.d.),

160

the products (40 mg) were loaded onto the silica gel bed. The column was then flushed with 250

161

mL of hexane/diethyl ether (60:40, v/v) to remove FFAs, followed by 20 mL of acetone to elute

162

the MGDGs. The eluted MGDG fractions were collected and dried under a nitrogen flush.

163

Analysis of the Purity of Structured MGDGs Enriched in PLA. The purity of the

164

structured MGDG fraction obtained from silica column chromatography was analyzed by liquid

165

chromatography (LC) equipped with an evaporative light scattering detector (ELSD). The LC

166

system (JASCO Corp., Tokyo, Japan) consisted of a pump (model PU-2089) and an autosampler

167

(model AS-2057). The ELSD (model Alltech 3300, Associates Inc., Deerfield, IL) contained a

168

drift tube that was maintained at 70 °C, and the flow of nitrogen was 2.5 L/min. The FFAs,

169

MGDGs,

170

LiChrospher® 100 Diol column (250 mm × 4 mm, 5-µm particle size; Merck, Darmstadt,

and

monogalactosylmonoacylglycerols

(MGMGs)

8 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

were

separated

using

a

Page 9 of 29

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

171

Germany). Optimal separation was achieved with a gradient elution using (A) n-hexane and (B)

172

a mixture of n-hexane/2-propanol/1-butanol/water (60:30:7:3, v/v/v/v) at a flow rate of 1 mL/min.

173

The gradients (time, %B) were set as (0 min, 70), (5 min, 100), (20 min, 100), and (25 min, 70).

174

The reaction products (1 mg) were dissolved in methanol (2 mL), and the solution was injected

175

into the column for analysis. The FFAs, MGDGs, and MGMGs were identified by comparing

176

their retention times with those of the standards, and their contents (wt %) were calculated.

177

Statistical Analysis. All data are presented as the mean value with the standard deviation (i.e.,

178

mean ± standard deviation). The difference in the lipid samples was determined using a Student’s

179

t-test or one-way analysis of variance followed by Duncan’s multiple range test. The difference

180

was considered significant if the P-value was < 0.05.

181 182

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

183

FA Composition of the Substrates. Table 1 gives the FA compositions of the PLA-enriched

184

FFAs and commercial MGDGs, which were used as the substrates in the acidolysis for preparing

185

structured MGDGs enriched in PLA. Pine nut oil and the FFA fraction obtained from the oil,

186

which was used as the starting materials to prepare PLA-enriched FFAs, were also given in the

187

table. The PLA-enriched FFAs contained 85.5 mol % PLA. The major FAs of commercial

188

MGDGs were n-3 polyunsaturated FAs, including α-linolenic (18:3n-3, 57.7 mol %) and

189

c7,c10,c13-hexadecatrienoic acid (16:3n-3, 37.5 mol %), thereby occupying 95.2 mol % of the

190

total FAs in the MGDGs.

191

Evaluation of the Catalytic Activity of the Lipases. The catalytic activities of four

192

commercial immobilized lipases were evaluated in the acidolysis of commercial MGDGs with

193

the PLA-enriched FFAs obtained from pine nut oil to prepare structured MGDGs enriched in 9 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

194

PLA. The reaction was performed in acetone because it was found that acetone was the most

195

effective medium for the reaction (unpublished observations). Lipozyme RM IM and Lipozyme

196

TL IM are sn-1,3-specific lipases, which show marked preferences for the acyl ester bonds at the

197

sn-1 and sn-3 positions of the glycerol backbone. However, Novozym 435 and immobilized C.

198

rugosa lipase on Immobead 150 are nonspecific lipases that do not show a distinct specificity

199

with respect to the position of the acyl ester bond. Figure 2 shows the PLA content in the

200

structured MGDGs that were separated from the reaction products by TLC as a function of the

201

reaction time (3–60 h). For these trials, the temperature, substrate molar ratio, and enzyme

202

loading were kept constant at 25 °C, 1:40 (MGDGs to PLA-enriched FFAs), and 20 wt % (based

203

on total substrates), respectively. Lipozyme RM IM gave a significantly greater PLA content

204

than any other lipases throughout the entire reaction and had a maximum PLA content of 42.3

205

mol % at 36 h. For the trial with Lipozyme TL IM, a maximum PLA content of 33.5 wt % was

206

obtained at 60 h. No PLA was found in the MGDGs present in the reaction products obtained

207

using Novozym 435 and C. rugosa lipase after 60 h, thereby indicating that these two

208

nonspecific lipases showed no catalytic activity in the reaction. These results suggest that

209

Lipozyme RM IM has the greatest catalytic activity in the acidolysis of MGDGs with the PLA-

210

enriched FFAs. Therefore, Lipozyme RM IM was selected as the most suitable biocatalyst for the

211

preparation of structured MGDGs enriched in PLA.

212

Effects of Reaction Conditions on the PLA Content in Structured MGDGs. We evaluated

213

the effect of three reaction parameters—temperature, substrate molar ratio, and enzyme

214

loading—on the Lipozyme RM IM-catalyzed acidolysis of commercial MGDGs with the PLA-

215

enriched FFAs obtained from pine nut oil to prepare structured MGDGs enriched in PLA.

216

Temperature. Temperature is a key parameter in an enzymatic reaction. In general, increasing 10 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 10 of 29

Page 11 of 29

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

217

the temperature increases the reaction rate by facilitating interactions between the enzymes and

218

substrates.16 However, too high temperatures can decrease the reaction rate because of

219

irreversible denaturation of the enzyme.10 The optimal temperature for Lipozyme RM IM lies

220

between approximately 30–50 °C (information provided by the manufacturer). Figure 3 shows

221

the effects of temperature on the PLA content in the structured MGDGs as a function of the

222

reaction time (3–60 h). We examined the reaction at 25–40 °C by considering the boiling point

223

(~56 °C) of acetone, which was used as the reaction medium, and the optimal temperature for

224

Lipozyme RM IM. For these experiments, the substrate molar ratio and enzyme loading were

225

maintained at 1:40 and 20 wt %, respectively. No significant difference was observed in the PLA

226

content among all the experiments throughout the reaction period. Furthermore, the maximum

227

PLA content (42.3 mol %) was achieved after 36 h at 25 °C; however, the PLA content was not

228

significantly different from that in the other experiments—the maximum PLA contents were 42.1

229

mol % (60 h) at 30 °C, 42.5 mol % (36 h) at 35 °C, and 42.8 mol % (36 h) at 40 °C. The

230

temperature must be reduced to synthesize structured MGDGs enriched in PLA using the

231

Lipozyme RM IM catalyst in an economically feasible manner. Therefore, 25 °C was considered

232

as the optimal temperature for the acidolysis reaction.

233

Substrate Molar Ratio. In the lipase-catalyzed acidolysis to prepare structured lipids, a

234

relatively higher molar ratio of the targeted FFA to the lipids incorporates a higher amount of

235

FFAs into the lipids.17 However, an excessive molar ratio can increase production costs for the

236

structured lipids because of the increased amount of waste products (i.e., unreacted FFA).

237

Therefore, for industrial applications, it would be preferable to prepare structured MGDGs

238

enriched in PLA at a relatively lower substrate molar ratio to minimize costs. Figure 4 illustrates

239

the effects of the substrate molar ratio on the PLA content in the structured MGDGs as a function 11 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 12 of 29

240

of the reaction time (3–60 h). The investigated substrate molar ratio varied from 1:10 to 1:40

241

(MGDGs to PLA-enriched FFAs). For these trials, the temperature and enzyme loading were

242

held constant at 25 °C and 20 wt %, respectively. At a substrate molar ratio of 1:10, the PLA

243

content in the MGDGs in the reaction products increased with longer reaction times but did not

244

reach a plateau throughout the reaction. For this trial, the maximum PLA content was 32.9 mol %

245

at 60 h. The PLA content obtained after 6 h in the trial with a substrate molar ratio of 1:20 was

246

significantly greater than that of the trial with a substrate molar ratio of 1:10. However, the

247

maximum PLA content (35.0 mol %) achieved at 60 h in the trial with a substrate molar ratio of

248

1:20 was not significantly different from that of the trial with a substrate molar ratio of 1:10.

249

When the substrate molar ratio increased from 1:20 to 1:30, a significant increase in the PLA

250

content was observed after 24 h. The maximum PLA content (42.1 mol % at 36 h) in the trial

251

with a substrate molar ratio of 1:30 was also significantly greater than that of the trial with a

252

substrate molar ratio of 1:20. However, a further increase in the substrate molar ratio to 1:40 did

253

not significantly increase the PLA content after 6 h over that obtained at a substrate molar ratio

254

of 1:30, although a significant increase in the PLA content was observed during the initial phase

255

(i.e., before 3 h) of the reaction. For this trial, the maximum PLA content (42.3 mol %) was

256

achieved at 36 h and was not significantly different from that of the trial with a substrate molar

257

ratio of 1:30. Therefore, the most suitable molar ratio of commercial MGDGs to PLA-enriched

258

FFAs for the acidolysis reaction was ≥1:30.

259

Enzyme Loading. An increase in the enzyme loading increases the reaction rate.18 However,

260

the enzyme loading must be reduced to attain an economically feasible reaction system. Figure 5

261

shows the effects of enzyme loading on the PLA content in the structured MGDG as a function

262

of the reaction time (3–60 h). The tested enzyme loading range was 5–20 wt %. For these trials, 12 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 13 of 29

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

263

the temperature and substrate molar ratio were kept constant at 25 °C and 1:40, respectively. An

264

increase in the enzyme loading generally increased the PLA content for reaction times ≤36 h.

265

The reaction time required to achieve the maximum PLA content generally decreased with

266

increased enzyme loading—the maximum PLA content was obtained at 60 h for 5 and 10 wt %,

267

48 h for 15 wt %, and 36 h for 20 wt % enzyme loadings, although no significant difference was

268

found in the maximum PLA content (41.9–42.5 mol %) in all trials. To enhance the economic

269

feasibility of the reaction system, it is important to reduce the reaction time and enzyme loading.

270

Therefore, an enzyme loading of 15 or 20 wt % was more desirable than 5 or 10 wt %.

271

Optimal Reaction Conditions. We attempted to establish optimal reaction conditions to

272

maximize the PLA content in the structured MGDGs while enhancing the economic feasibility of

273

the reaction system. From the experimental results in sections 3.1.1–3.3.3, four combinations of

274

reaction factors were generated, and optimal reaction conditions were selected from these results

275

(Figure 6). Combinations for the substrate molar ratio and enzyme loading include 1:30 and 15

276

wt %, 1:30 and 20 wt %, 1:40 and 15 wt %, and 1:40 and 20 wt %, respectively. The temperature

277

was fixed at 25 °C. The PLA content obtained in the trials with 1:30 (substrate molar ratio) and

278

20 wt % (enzyme loading), 1:40 and 15 wt %, or 1:40 and 20 wt % were generally greater than

279

that of the trial with 1:30 and 15 wt % throughout the reaction time, whereas no significant

280

difference was found in the PLA content in the former three conditions after 12 h. The maximal

281

PLA contents (41.9–42.3 mol %) obtained under these three conditions were greater than that

282

(39.3 mol %) for the trial with a substrate molar ratio and enzyme loading of 1:30 and 15 wt %,

283

respectively, but the results were not significantly different from each other. However, the

284

reaction time to achieve the maximum PLA content was shorter in the trials with 1:30 and 20 wt %

285

(36 h) or 1:40 and 20 wt % (36 h) than in the trials with 1:30 and 15 wt % (60 h) or 1:40 and 15 13 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

286

wt % (48 h). Consequently, it was concluded that the optimal reaction conditions were at a

287

temperature of 25 °C, substrate molar ratio of 1:30 (MGDGs to PLA-enriched FFAs), enzyme

288

loading of 20 wt % of the total substrates, and reaction time of 36 h. Structured MGDGs

289

containing 42.1 mol % PLA were obtained under these conditions.

290

Purification of the Structured MGDGs from the Reaction Products. Structured MGDGs

291

enriched in PLA were purified from the reaction products obtained under the optimal conditions

292

established in this study using silica column chromatography. Figure 7 compares the LC-ELSD

293

chromatograms of the reaction products and purified products obtained from the reaction

294

products. Before the purification, the reaction products contained 0.9 wt % MGDGs, 98.8 wt %

295

FFAs, and 0.3% MGMGs. Using silica column chromatography, the FFAs were almost

296

completely removed during the first elution using hexane/diethyl ether (60:40, v/v). Then the

297

residual FFAs, MGDGs, and MGMGs were eluted in order from the silica column using acetone

298

as the second eluent. The final purified products obtained after silica column chromatography

299

contained 96.6 wt % MGDGs and 3.4 wt % FFAs.

300

FA Composition of the Structured MGDGs. Table 1 compares the FA composition of the

301

structured MGDGs that were purified by silica column chromatography and that of the

302

commercial MGDGs. The structured MGDGs contained 42.1 mol % PLA, 31.1 mol % 16:3n-3,

303

8.0 mol % palmitic acid (16:0), 7.5 mol % 18:3n-3, 7.3 mol % linoleic acid (18:2n-6), 2.6 mol %

304

stearic acid (18:0), and 1.4 mol % oleic acid (18:1n-9). The contents of the two major FAs (i.e.,

305

18:3n-3 and 16:3n-3) of commercial MGDGs were significantly reduced in the structured

306

MGDGs; in particular, the 18:3n-3 content was more drastically reduced compared to the 16:3n-

307

3 content. These results suggest that 18:3n-3 was more predominant at the sn-1 position of

308

commercial MGDGs than 16:3n-3. However, further investigations into the positional 14 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 14 of 29

Page 15 of 29

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

309

distribution of FAs in the commercial MGDGs and structured MGDGs are required to reveal the

310

cause of this phenomenon.

311

In conclusion, the enzymatic reaction system used for acidolysis of commercial MGDGs with

312

PLA-enriched FFAs obtained from pine nut oil to prepare structured MGDGs enriched in PLA

313

used Lipozyme RM IM as the biocatalyst and acetone as the medium. It was demonstrated that

314

the structured MGDGs containing ~42 mol % PLA could be obtained under optimal reaction

315

conditions, which were established in this study. The structured MGDGs were successfully

316

purified at a high purity of ~97 wt % using silica column chromatography with a two-step elution.

317

The resulting structured MGDGs enriched in PLA would be suitable as emulsifiers with appetite-

318

suppression effects. However, for these applications, this study contains some limitations,

319

including the use of commercial MGDGs as the substrates and the use of very small quantities of

320

the substrates. Therefore, further investigations into the development of new MGDG sources and

321

scaling up the reaction system would be required for their possible applications.

322 323

ABBREVIATIONS USED

324

ELSD, evaporative light scattering detector; FA, fatty acid; FAME, fatty acid methyl ester; FFA,

325

free

326

monogalactosylmonoacylglycerol; PLA, pinolenic acid; TLC, thin layer chromatography

fatty

acid;

MGDG,

monogalactosydiacylglycerol;

MGMG,

327 328

Funding

329

This research was supported by Main Research Program (E0124200-05) of the Korea Food

330

Research Institute (KFRI) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning and was

331

also supported by the Sookmyung Women’s University Research Grants (1-1703-2047). 15 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 16 of 29

332 333

Notes

334

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

335 336 337 338 339 340

REFERENCES (1) Gounaris, K.; Barber, J. Monogalactosyldiacylglycerol: The most abundant polar lipid in nature. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1983, 8, 378–381. (2) Dörmann, P.; Benning, C. Galactolipids rule in seed plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2002, 7, 112– 118.

341

(3) Nakamura, Y.; Shimojima, M.; Ohta, H.; Shimojima, K. Biosynthesis and function of

342

monogalactosyldiacylglycerol (MGDG), the signature lipid of chloroplasts. In The Chloroplast.

343

Advances in Photosynthesis and Respiration (vol. 31), 1st ed.; Rebeiz, C. A., Benning, C.,

344

Bohnert, H., Daniell, H. J., Hoober, J. K., Lichtenthaler, H. K., Portis, A. R., Tripathy, B. C.

345

Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2010; pp 185–202.

346

(4) Banskota, A. H.; Steevensz, A. J.; Stefanova, R.; Sperker, S.; Melanson, R.; Osborne, J. A.;

347

O’Leary,

S.

J.

B.;

Melanson,

J.

E.

Pancreatic

lipase

inhibitory

activity

of

348

monogalactosyldiacylglycerols isolated from the freshwater microalga Chlorella sorokiniana. J.

349

Appl. Phycol. 2016, 28, 169–175.

350

(5) Chu, B. S.; Rich, G. T.; Ridout, M. J.; Faulks, R. M.; Wickham, M. S.; Wilde, P. J. (2009).

351

Modulating pancreatic lipase activity with galactolipids: effects of emulsion interfacial

352

composition. Langmuir 2009, 25, 9352–9360.

353

(6) Nakae, T.; Kometani, T.; Nishimura, T.; Takii, H.; Okada, S. Preparation of

354

glyceroglycolipids from pumpkin and their effects on polymorphic transformation of cocoa 16 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 17 of 29

355 356 357 358 359 360 361

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

butter. Food Sci. Technol. Res. 2000, 6, 263–268. (7) Selmair, P. L.; Koehler, P. Role of glycolipids in breadmaking. Lipid Technol. 2010, 22, 7– 10. (8) Xie, K. Y.; Miles, E. A.; Calder, P. C. A review of the potential health benefits of pine nut oil and its characteristic fatty acid pinolenic acid. J. Funct. Food. 2016, 23, 464–473. (9) Kim, B. H.; Akoh, C. C. Recent research trends on the enzymatic synthesis of structured lipids. J. Food Sci. 2015, 80, C1713–C1724.

362

(10) Willis, W. M.; Marangoni, A. G. Enzymatic interesterification. In Akoh, C. C., Min, D. B.

363

Eds., Food Lipids–Chemistry, Nutrition, and Biotechnology, 3rd ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL,

364

2008; pp 807–840.

365

(11) Choi, J. H.; Kim, B. H.; Hong, S. I.; Kim, Y.; Kim, I. H. Synthesis of structured lipids

366

containing pinolenic acid at the sn-2 position via lipase-catalyzed acidolysis. J. Am. Oil Chem.

367

Soc. 2012, 89, 1449–1454.

368

(12) Woo, H.; Kim, J.; Kim, I. H.; Choi, H. D.; Choi, I. W.; Kim, B. H. Substrate selectivity of

369

Novozym 435 in the esterification of glycerol with an equimolar mixture of linoleic, conjugated

370

linoleic, and pinolenic acids. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2016, 118, 928–937.

371

(13) Chung, M. Y.; Woo, H.; Kim, J.; Kong, D.; Choi, H. D.; Choi, I. W.; Kim, I. H.; Noh, S.

372

K.; Kim, B. H. Pinolenic acid in structured triacylglycerols exhibits superior intestinal lymphatic

373

absorption as compared to pinolenic acid in natural pine nut oil. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65,

374

1543–1549.

375

(14) Pyo, Y. G.; Hong, S. I.; Kim, Y.; Kim, B. H.; Kim, I. H. Synthesis of monoacylglycerol

376

containing pinolenic acid via stepwise esterification using a cold active lipase. Biotechnol. Prog. 17 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

377

2012, 28, 1218–1224.

378

(15) Kang, K. K.; Kim, S.; Kim, I. H.; Lee, C.; Kim, B. H. Selective enrichment of symmetric

379

monounsaturated triacylglycerols from palm stearin by double solvent fractionation. LWT–Food

380

Sci. Technol. 2013, 51, 242–252.

381

(16) Garcia, H. S.; Keough, K. J.; Arcos, J. A.; Hill, C. G. Continuous interesterification of

382

butteroil and conjugated linoleic acid in a tubular reactor packed with an immobilized lipase.

383

Biotechnol. Tech. 1999, 13, 369–373.

384

(17) Kim, B. H.; Akoh, C. C. Modeling of lipase-catalyzed acidolysis of sesame oil and

385

caprylic acid by response surface methodology: Optimization of reaction conditions by

386

considering both acyl incorporation and migration. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 8033–8037.

387

(18) Blasi, F.; Maurelli, S.; Cossignani, L.; D’Arco, G.; Simonetti, M. S.; Damiani, P. Study of

388

some experimental parameters in the synthesis of triacylglycerols with CLA isomers and

389

structural analysis. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2009, 86, 531–537.

390

18 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 18 of 29

Page 19 of 29

391

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Figure captions

392 393

Figure 1. Preparation of structured MGDGs enriched in PLA by Lipozyme RM IM-catalyzed

394

acidolysis of commercial MGDGs with PLA-enriched FFAs obtained from pine nut oil.

395 396

Figure 2. PLA content in the structured MGDGs present in the reaction products obtained by

397

acidolysis of commercial MGDGs with PLA-enriched FFAs mediated by various commercial

398

immobilized lipases. The reaction was performed at 25 °C, substrate molar ratio of 1:40

399

(MGDGs to PLA-enriched FFAs), enzyme loading of 20 wt % (based on total substrates), and

400

agitation speed of 8.3 Hz in acetone in a stirred-batch reactor. All trials were conducted in

401

duplicate. Means indicated by the same letter (a–c) are not significantly different (P > 0.05).

402 403

Figure 3. Effects of temperature on the PLA content in the structured MGDGs present in the

404

reaction products obtained by Lipozyme RM IM-catalyzed acidolysis as a function of the

405

reaction time. The reaction was performed at substrate molar ratio of 1:40 (MGDGs to PLA-

406

enriched FFAs), enzyme loading of 20 wt % (based on total substrates), and agitation speed of

407

8.3 Hz in acetone in a stirred-batch reactor. All trials were conducted in duplicate. Means

408

indicated by "n.s." (not significant) are not significantly different (P > 0.05).

409 410

Figure 4. Effects of substrate molar ratio (MGDGs to PLA-enriched FFAs) on the PLA content

411

in the structured MGDGs present in the reaction products obtained by Lipozyme RM IM-

412

catalyzed acidolysis as a function of the reaction time. The reaction was performed at 25 °C,

413

enzyme loading of 20 wt % (based on total substrates), and agitation speed of 8.3 Hz in acetone 19 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 20 of 29

414

in a stirred-batch reactor. All trials were conducted in duplicate. Means indicated by the same

415

letter (a–c) are not significantly different (P > 0.05).

416 417

Figure 5. Effects of enzyme loading (based on total substrates) on the PLA content in the

418

structured MGDGs present in the reaction products obtained by Lipozyme RM IM-catalyzed

419

acidolysis as a function of the reaction time. The reaction was performed at 25 °C, substrate

420

molar ratio of 1:40 (MGDGs to PLA-enriched FFAs), and agitation speed of 8.3 Hz in acetone in

421

a stirred-batch reactor. All trials were conducted in duplicate. Means indicated by the same letter

422

(a–d) are not significantly different (P > 0.05).

423 424

Figure 6. PLA content in the structured MGDGs in the reaction products obtained by Lipozyme

425

RM IM-catalyzed acidolysis for four different combinations of the substrate molar ratio

426

(MGDGs to PLA-enriched FFAs) and enzyme loading (based on total substrates). The reaction

427

was performed at 25 °C and agitation speed of 8.3 Hz in acetone in a stirred-batch reactor. All

428

trials were conducted in duplicate. Means indicated by the same letter (a–c) are not significantly

429

different (P > 0.05).

430 431

Figure

432

chromatograms of (A) reaction products obtained by Lipozyme RM IM-catalyzed acidolysis of

433

commercial MGDGs with PLA-enriched FFAs under the optimal conditions, and (B) purified

434

products obtained from the reaction products using silica column chromatography.

7.

Liquid

chromatography-evaporative

light

20 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

scattering

detector

(LC-ELSD)

Page 21 of 29

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Figure 1

21 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Figure 2

22 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 22 of 29

Page 23 of 29

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Figure 3

23 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Figure 4

24 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 24 of 29

Page 25 of 29

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Figure 5

25 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Figure 6

26 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 26 of 29

Page 27 of 29

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Figure 7

27 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 28 of 29

Table 1. Total FA Composition of PLA-enriched FFAs, Commercial MGDGs, and Structured MGDGs Prepared by Lipozyme RM IM-Catalyzed Acidolysis of Commercial MGDGs with PLA-Enriched FFAs (mol %) FA

pine nut oil

FFA fraction obtained from pine nut oil

PLA-enriched FFAs

commercial MGDGs

structured MGDGs enriched in PLA

16:0

5.3 ± 0.0

4.5 ± 0.0

n.d.a

1.4 ± 0.0

8.0 ± 1.0*

16:1n-7

0.1 ± 0.0

n.d.

n.d.

n.d.

n.d.

16:3n-3

n.d.

n.d.

n.d.

37.5 ± 0.1

31.1 ± 0.8*

18:0

2.1 ± 0.0

2.3 ± 0.0

n.d.

0.1 ± 0.0

2.6 ± 0.1*

18:1n-9

25.7 ± 0.1

27.1 ± 0.1

0.2 ± 0.0

0.4 ± 0.1

1.4 ± 0.1*

18:1n-7

0.5 ± 0.0

0.5 ± 0.0

n.d.

n.d.

n.d.

n.d.

n.d.

n.d.

0.1 ± 0.0

n.d.

c5,c9-18:2

2.2 ± 0.0

2.3 ± 0.0

n.d.

n.d.

n.d.

18:2n-6

46.0 ± 0.1

45.3 ± 0.2

4.6 ± 0.0

2.6 ± 0.2

7.3 ± 0.6*

c5,c9,c12-18:3 (PLA)

13.7 ± 0.0

13.0 ± 0.1

85.5 ± 0.2

n.d.

42.1 ± 0.5

18:3n-3

0.6 ± 0.0

0.2 ± 0.0

n.d.

57.7 ± 0.0

7.5 ± 0.3*

18:3t

n.d.

n.d.

n.d.

0.2 ± 0.0

n.d.

20:0

0.3 ± 0.0

0.5 ± 0.0

0.9 ± 1.2

n.d.

n.d.

20:1

1.1 ± 0.0

1.5 ± 0.1

n.d.

n.d.

n.d.

20:2

0.6 ± 0.0

0.8 ± 0.0

n.d.

n.d.

n.d.

c5,c11,c14-20:3

1.1 ± 0.0

1.3 ± 0.0

1.7 ± 0.0

n.d.

n.d.

Unidentified

0.7 ± 0.1

0.7 ± 0.0

7.0 ± 1.4

n.d.

n.d.

18:1t

All values represent mean ± standard deviation (n = 2). a Not detected. * Significantly different from commercial MGDGs, P < 0.05.

28 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 29 of 29

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

TOC Graphic

29 ACS Paragon Plus Environment