Fluorescence Reports Intact Quantum Dot Uptake into Roots and

Dec 1, 2014 - Houston, Texas 77005, United States. •S Supporting Information. ABSTRACT: We explored the impact of quantum dot (QD) coat characterist...
0 downloads 0 Views 1MB Size
Subscriber access provided by - Access paid by the | UCSF Library

Article

Fluorescence Reports Intact Quantum Dot Uptake into Roots and Translocation to Leaves of Arabidopsis thaliana and Subsequent Ingestion by Insect Herbivores Yeonjong Koo, Jing Wang, Qingbo Zhang, Huiguang Zhu, E. Wassim Chehab, Vicki L. Colvin, Pedro J. J. Alvarez, and Janet Braam Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/es5050562 • Publication Date (Web): 01 Dec 2014 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on December 10, 2014

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Environmental Science & Technology is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 26

Environmental Science & Technology

Fluorescence Reports Intact Quantum Dot Uptake into Roots and Translocation to Leaves of Arabidopsis thaliana and Subsequent Ingestion by Insect Herbivores

Yeonjong Koo†,*, Jing Wang‡, Qingbo Zhang§, Huiguang Zhu§, E. Wassim Chehab†, Vicki L. Colvin§, Pedro J. J. Alvarez‡, and Janet Braam†,*



Department of BioSciences, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA.



Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA.

§

Department of Chemistry, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA

*

To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected], Tel: (713)348-4277

(J.B.); E-mail: [email protected], Tel: (713)348-6963 (Y.K.).

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

TOC Art

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 2 of 26

Page 3 of 26

Environmental Science & Technology

1

ABSTRACT

2

We explored the impact of quantum dot (QD) coat characteristics on NP stability, uptake and

3

translocation in Arabidopsis thaliana, and subsequent transfer to primary consumers,

4

Trichoplusia ni (T. ni). Arabidopsis was exposed to CdSe/CdZnS QDs with three different

5

coatings: poly(acrylic acid-ethylene glycol) (PAA-EG), polyethylenimine (PEI) and poly(maleic

6

anhydride-alt-1-octadecene)-poly(ethylene glycol) (PMAO-PEG), which are cationic, anionic,

7

and relatively neutral, respectively. PAA-EG-coated QDs were relatively stable and taken up

8

from a hydroponic medium through both Arabidopsis leaf petioles and roots, without apparent

9

aggregation, and showed generally uniform distribution in leaves. In contrast, PEI- and PMAO-

10

PEG-coated QDs displayed destabilization in the hydroponic medium, and generated particulate

11

fluorescence plant tissues, suggesting aggregation. PAA-EG QDs moved faster than PEI QDs

12

was through leaf petioles, however 8-fold more cadmium accumulated in PEI QD-treated than in

13

those exposed to PAA-EG QDs, possibly due to PEI QD dissolution and direct metal uptake. T.

14

ni caterpillars that fed on Arabidopsis exposed to QDs had reduced performance, and QD

15

fluorescence was detected in both T. ni bodies and frass, demonstrating trophic transfer of intact

16

QDs from plants to insects. Overall, this paper demonstrates that QD coat properties influence

17

plant nanoparticle uptake and translocation and can impact transfer to herbivores.

18

Keywords: quantum dots, nanomaterials, surface coating, translocation, root absorption,

19

food web, plant-insect interactions

1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

20

INTRODUCTION

21

Possible uptake and accumulation of nanoparticles (NPs) in plants, especially in the

22

edible parts, has raised great concern over human exposure from food web contamination.1

23

However, very few studies have investigated the possibility of NP transfer from plant uptake into

24

a potential food web, with those published focused on aquatic2-5 and microbial6, 7 systems. For

25

example, poly(acrylic acid)-octylamine-coated CdSe/ZnS was found to be transferred from

26

zooplankton to zebrafish (Danio rerio) with a biomagnification factor (BMF) of 0.04.3 Over 5-

27

fold biomagnification of uncoated CdSe quantum dots (QDs) was also observed in protozoa

28

(Tetrahymena thermophila) when QDs were transferred from bacteria (Pseudomonas

29

aeruginosa).7 Transfer of carboxylated and biotinylated QDs from ciliated protozoan to rotifers

30

was also reported.6 Nevertheless, studies on NP transfer in a terrestrial ecosystem, from primary

31

producers (e.g., plants) to primary consumers (e.g., pests), are very limited,8, 9 with one report

32

showing transfer of Au NPs of different sizes from tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L. cv Xanathi) to

33

tobacco hornworm (Manduca sexta) with 6.2, 11.6 and 9.6 BMF for 5, 10, and 15 nm Au NPs,

34

respectively.8 However, there remains a critical knowledge gap in trophic transfer of NPs in

35

food chains more closely relevant to human consumption.

36

Furthermore, the mechanism(s) underlying NP uptake and translocation by plants

37

remains poorly understood. NP solutions are dynamic, being able to aggregate and dissolve. In

38

addition, plants can take up various ions from the growth medium or soil and reductively

39

precipitate them as particles.10-13 Therefore, the presence of particles in a plant is not always

40

definitive proof for the plant ability to take up and translocate intact metal NPs. QDs are

41

particularly suited for studying intact NP uptake in plants. In addition to be useful for tracking of

2 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 4 of 26

Page 5 of 26

Environmental Science & Technology

42

particle uptake and movement in variety of organisms,14-17 fluorescence is only detected when

43

intact QDs are present. Furthermore, breakdown components are very unlikely to reconstitute

44

into fluorescent QDs in plants, especially with the original narrow light spectrum.18, 19 Another

45

issue to consider in NP uptake and translocation by plants is the effect of NP surface coatings.

46

Many types of metallic NPs, including the core ions of QDs, are coated by a polymer surface to

47

increase stability, water-solubility and usefulness (e.g., enhancement of biocompatibility for bio-

48

imaging applications).14, 15, 20-23 Once released into the environment, the coatings could affect NP

49

interactions with plants. The effect of such NP surface coatings has been explored in a limited

50

number of studies.10, 15, 22 It was previously demonstrated that QDs with NH2 groups composing

51

the surface coat were able to translocate to plant aerial tissues,24 and QDs conjugated with two

52

different polymers also showed different uptake rates by poplar.25 Zhai et al. reported the

53

transport of Au NPs through poplar plasmodesmata,26 although it is unknown whether this

54

transport pattern also applies to other NPs, such as QDs, and whether NP surface coats affect

55

their translocation pattern throughout the whole plant.27, 28

56

In this report, we report on the effect of QD coats on particle stability and plant uptake

57

and translocation, and trophic transfer to a generalist herbivore. We chose QDs for this study

58

because, as nano-scale fluorescent semiconductors, they enable tracking of intact particle uptake

59

and movement. In addition, we chose to use Arabidopsis thaliana, a member of Brassicaceae

60

family; therefore the findings may be relevant to diverse and popular vegetables, such as cabbage,

61

kale, and broccoli. Furthermore, the extensive tools and resources available for this model plant

62

will facilitate future investigations of the underlying molecular genetic and genomic bases for

63

differential NP uptake, translocation, and toxicity.

3 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

64

65

MATERIALS AND METHODS

66

QD Synthesis and Characterization

67

QDs were synthesized as described in Zhu et al. (2010). For surface modification of QDs,

68

the as-synthesized QD core was transferred to aqueous solution using ligand exchange or

69

encapsulation methods.29, 30 PAA-EG30 and PMAO-PEG31 were synthesized using procedures

70

described previously32 and PEI (MW = 25000) (408727, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) was

71

purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. 0.1 mL of polymer solution was added to 1 mL of ethyl ether

72

solution of QDs under stirring. 1 mL of water was then added to the solution and sonicated for 2

73

minutes. The mixture was stirred overnight to evaporate ethyl ether. The nanoparticles were

74

purified by ultracentrifugation at 183,000 x g and 0.2 µm syringe filtration. Purified

75

nanoparticles were redispersed in deionized water. Uniform cores and core sizes were

76

characterized with TEM imaging.25 QD concentrations were determined by chemical digestion

77

with ICP-MS (Elan 9000, PerkinElmer, MA), as described below. The zeta potential of each QD

78

solutions was determined with Zen 3600 Zetasizer Nano (Malvern Instruments, United Kingdom)

79

at 10 µg/mL concentration. Differential stability of QD fluorescence, indicating particle

80

structural integrity and QD tendency to aggregate in plant growth media and water are reported

81

in the Supplementary Information (Figure S1).

82

Plant Growth and QD Treatments

83

QDs were dispersed in water or 1/4, 1/8 or 1/16-strength of Hoagland solution33 at 10

84

µg/mL Cd concentration. Arabidopsis were grown in soil or hydroponically in Hoagland solution,

85

as described in text, under cycles of 12-hour light (100 µmole/m-2s-1)/12-hour dark at 23oC, 75% 4 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 6 of 26

Page 7 of 26

Environmental Science & Technology

86

relative humidity. For detached leaf petiole assays, 4-week-old soil-grown Arabidopsis plants

87

were used as sources of leaves. Leaf petioles were cut 1 mm from the main stem and the cut edge

88

was placed immediately into a drop of media with or without QDs, as indicated, on a glass slide

89

up to 1-hour (Figure S2A). The detached leaves were placed under 25 µmole/m-2s-1 of light to

90

maintain transpiration. For whole plant hydroponics, seed holder components of Araponic

91

hydroponic culture system (Kit 140 HD, Araponics, Belgium) were used. Arabidopsis seeds

92

were sown on 0.8% agar, with 1/16 strength of Hoagland solution, within the seed holder. After

93

germination, single Arabidopsis plants were grown in 15-mL conical tubes for 4 weeks and then

94

transferred to 1/16-strength Hoagland solution containing either PAA-EG or PEI QDs at 10

95

µg/mL for 7 days before analysis.

96

Confocal Microscopy and Fluorescence Measurement

97

A confocal microscope, LSM 710 (Zeiss, Germany) equipped with 514 nm laser for

98

excitation, was set at 580 nm to 620 nm for harvesting spectra for QD detection and avoiding

99

endogenous fluorescence of plant tissues. The laser strength was set at 3000 and gain values set

100

at 900 in the operating software Zeiss ZEN 2010 (Zeiss, Germany). QD fluorescence strengths

101

were measured with Infinte 200 pro (Tecan, Switzerland) plate reader at 514 nm excitation and

102

600 nm emission.

103

The whole plant photographs were taken with Nikon D80 digital camera using UV365nm

104

light exposure with a UVGL-58 (UVP, Upland, CA) handheld UV lamp.

105

ICP-MS Analysis

106 107

Quantitative cadmium (Cd) and selenium (Se) analyses were done following the method described previously.34 QD-treated Arabidopsis were harvested and frozen in liquid nitrogen 5 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

108

immediately. Harvested samples were ground using TissueLyser II (Qiagen, Germantown, MD)

109

and dried completely at 100℃ for 48 hours before determining dry weight. After overnight

110

digestion with 70% HNO3 (A509, Fisher Scientific, PA) and 30% of H2O2 (H325, Fisher

111

Scientific, PA) samples were filtered with 0.2 µm of syringe filters (28145, VWR International,

112

Radnor, PA). Cd and Se elements were analyzed with Elan 9000 apparatus ICP-MS

113

(PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA). The plant extraction method was verified by comparing the Cd

114

and Se recovery from direct solubilization of QDs to Cd and Se to plant leaves injected with QDs;

115

no significant differences in recovery were found between the samples. Germanium was used for

116

the internal standard for recovery and injection control. A standard curve was obtained from 1, 2,

117

4, 8, 16 and 32 ng/mL of Ge, Cd and Se ion injection and regression coefficient was over 0.99.

118

Trichoplusia ni Treatment

119

For cabbage looper Trichoplusia ni (T. ni) treatment, Arabidopsis were grown in 1/4-

120

strength Hoagland solution for 4 weeks and 16 Arabidopsis plants were transferred to media

121

containing QDs in 1/16-strength Hoagland solution. Plants were grown for 3 days in the presence

122

of 10 µg/mL of QDs, at which point no signs of toxicity were apparent, before T. ni treatment. T.

123

ni handling was performed as previously described.35, 36 Eggs of the T. ni were purchased from

124

Benzon Research, Inc (Carlisle, PA). Fifteen newly hatched T. ni larvae were transferred with a

125

fine brush onto the 16 Arabidopsis plants for each treatment group. Arabidopsis and T. ni

126

samples were harvested 7 days after T. ni transfer. Harvested T. ni were analyzed with both

127

confocal microscopy and ICP-MS, and the remaining Arabidopsis leaves were also analyzed

128

with ICP-MS. Arabidopsis growth and T. ni treatment were carried out at 23oC, 50% relative

129

humidity under 24-hour continuous light at 25 µmole/m-2s-1 light intensity. 6 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 8 of 26

Page 9 of 26

Environmental Science & Technology

130

Statistical Analyses

131

Standard deviations are indicated as error bars for all data sets. Statistical significances between

132

data were calculated by the student t test with two-tailed distribution. Data with p values below

133

0.05 or 0.01 are indicated as significantly different.

134

135

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

136

QD Coat Characteristics Affect Particle Uptake Rate and Translocation Through

137

Arabidopsis Leaf Petioles

138

To first assess QD translocation through Arabidopsis leaf tissue in the absence of

139

complications or restrictions that could arise from root uptake, we examined movement of QD

140

through freshly cut leaf petioles. Petioles were immersed into 1/16-strength Hoagland solution

141

containing 10 µg/mL of QDs with PAA-EG, PEI, or PMAO-PEG coats (Figure S2A). All three

142

types of QDs were readily visible at the cut petiole base under confocal analysis within one hour

143

of leaf exposure to the QDs (Figure 1A). However, only the PAA-EG and PEI QDs were

144

detectable as multiple elongated fluorescence traces beyond 15 mm from the cut petiole base

145

(Figure 1A-G), suggesting efficient translocation. The QDs appeared to travel through

146

contiguous cells, likely major vascular tissues, but with some leakage occurring to neighboring

147

cells (Figure 1B, 1D, 1F, Figure S2B). The smooth appearance of the PAA-EG QD-treated plant

148

cells suggests that the negatively charged coat may enable relatively fluidic movement through

149

the plant vascular tissue (Figure 1, Figure S2B). Fluorescence became less uniform as the

150

translocation distance from the cut site increased (Figure 1A-G). PAA-EG QD fluorescence at

151

distal sites was strongest along the edges of plant cells (Figure 1C), as if adhering against cell 7 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

152

membranes or walls. Whereas the in planta PAA-EG QD fluorescence appeared smooth and

153

uniform, the PEI and PMAO-PEG QD fluorescence had a particulate appearance (Figure 1,

154

Figure S2B), suggesting particle aggregation. Only minimal fluorescence could be detected in

155

distal petiole regions from PMAO-PEG QD-exposed leaves despite strong fluorescence at the

156

petiole base. The strong PMAO-PEG QDs fluorescence at the petiole base and minimal

157

fluorescence detected more distally are findings consistent with the interpretation of in vitro

158

behaviors that the PMAO-PEG QD particles may readily aggregate (Figure S1). Therefore

159

PMAO-PEG QDs may form particles of sizes and/or structures that are incapable of efficient

160

translocation through plant tissues. These data demonstrate that once introduced directly into the

161

vascular tissue of Arabidopsis leaf petioles, PAA-EG and PEI QD particles can move through

162

the petiole, whereas PMAO-PEG particles fail to translocate readily, possibly because of PMAO-

163

PEG QDs aggregation tendencies. These findings are consistent with previous work that showed

164

that nanomaterial coats can influence plant uptake and translocation.21, 23, 25, 37

165

To assess the role of Arabidopsis leaf age in QD movement, we compared translocation

166

rates of PAA-EG and PEI QDs in younger leaves to that of older leaves. Petioles of younger

167

rosette leaves, that is, the 7th, 8th, and 9th leaves to form during rosette development, transported

168

both PAA-EG and PEI QDs faster on average than the petioles of rosette leaves that developed

169

1st, 2nd, and 3rd (Figure 1I; a and b, p