Hydrophobic Ni-rich Layered Oxides as Cathode Materials for Lithium

2 days ago - One of their catastrophic failure modes is the formation of residual lithium compounds on the oxide surface when it is exposed to air. In...
0 downloads 0 Views 1MB Size
Subscriber access provided by Nottingham Trent University

Article

Hydrophobic Ni-rich Layered Oxides as Cathode Materials for Lithium-ion Batteries Sung Wook Doo, Suyeon Lee, Hanseul Kim, Jin H. Choi, and Kyu Tae Lee ACS Appl. Energy Mater., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acsaem.9b00786 • Publication Date (Web): 16 Aug 2019 Downloaded from pubs.acs.org on August 17, 2019

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 42 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Applied Energy Materials

1

Hydrophobic Ni-rich Layered Oxides as Cathode

2

Materials for Lithium-ion Batteries

3

Sung Wook Doo,† Suyeon Lee,† Hanseul Kim,† Jin H. Choi,§ Kyu Tae Lee†,*

4

5



School of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Institute of Chemical Processes, Seoul

6

National University, 1, Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea

7

§

8

Republic of Korea

Korea Electric Power Corporation Research Institute, Yuseong-Gu, Daejeon 34056,

9

10

* E-mail: [email protected]

11

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

1

ACS Applied Energy Materials 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 2 of 42

12

KEYWORDS: lithium ion battery, cathode, surface engineering, hydrophobic, residual

13

lithium compounds

14

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

2

Page 3 of 42 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Applied Energy Materials

15

ABSTRACT: Ni-rich layered oxide materials have been considered as promising cathode

16

materials for high energy density Li-ion batteries because of their high reversible capacity.

17

One of their catastrophic failure modes is the formation of residual lithium compounds on

18

the oxide surface when it is exposed to air. In this paper, it is demonstrated that water is

19

essential for the formation of residual lithium at room temperature. Furthermore,

20

hydrophobic LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 is introduced to suppress the formation of residual lithium

21

because the hydrophobic surface inhibits contact between water and LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2.

22

Hydrophobic LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 is obtained through surface engineering using

23

hydrophobic

24

polydimethylsiloxane-grafted LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 suppresses the formation of residual

25

lithium even in humid air, leading to the negligible surface degradation of

26

LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2. As a result, hydrophobic LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 shows excellent

27

electrochemical performance even after storage in humid air for two weeks.

organic

molecules,

such

as

polydimethylsiloxane.

Hydrophobic

28

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

3

ACS Applied Energy Materials 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 4 of 42

29

Introduction

30

Ni-rich layered oxide materials (Li[Ni1‒x‒yCoxMny]O2: 1‒x‒y ≥ 0.8) have been considered

31

as promising cathode materials for high energy density Li-ion batteries because of their

32

high reversible capacity of approximately 200 mA h g‒1.1-10 However, the electrochemical

33

performance of Li[Ni1-x-yCoxMny]O2 (1-x-y ≥ 0.8) is not sufficient to meet the demands of

34

commercial cathode materials. One of their catastrophic failure modes is the formation of

35

residual lithium compounds on the Ni-rich layered oxide surface.11 Because the surface

36

of Ni-rich oxide materials is unstable in air, the surface reacts with moisture and carbon

37

dioxide when it is exposed to ambient air. This results in the formation of residual lithium

38

compounds, such as Li2CO3, LiOH, and LiHCO3, on the surface. In addition, as 1‒x‒y in

39

Li[Ni1‒x‒yCoxMny]O2 increases, the formation of residual lithium compounds is known to

40

accelerate.12-13

41

When residual lithium compounds form on the surface, some Li ions in

42

Li[Ni1‒x‒yCoxMny]O2 are deintercalated and react with moisture and carbon dioxide. As a

43

result, the initial charging capacity decreases with increasing amounts of residual lithium

44

compounds.14-17 Residual lithium compounds also increase cell resistance, resulting in

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

4

Page 5 of 42 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Applied Energy Materials

45

poor rate capability.18-19 Moreover, residual lithium compounds are irreversibly

46

decomposed with the formation of a gas during charging. This causes a swollen battery,

47

leading to both severe capacity fading and safety problems.20-25 In this connection, many

48

research groups have focused on the removal of residual lithium compounds and

49

demonstrated the resulting promising electrochemical performance.26 For example, a

50

water washing process is known to be necessary for commercial Ni-rich layered oxide

51

materials because this process effectively removes residual lithium compounds, which

52

are highly soluble in water.27-29 However, the reduced initial charging capacity and cost

53

increase due to water washing remain unresolved. Recently, surface modification and

54

doping have improved the surface stability of Ni-rich oxide materials in air, resulting in

55

improved electrochemical performance.30-36 In this paper, we introduced hydrophobic Ni-

56

rich layered oxide materials to suppress the formation of residual lithium compounds. We

57

demonstrated that water is essential for the formation of residual lithium at room

58

temperature.25 Based on this fact, we obtained hydrophobic Ni-rich oxide materials

59

through

60

polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS).37-45 Hydrophobic Ni-rich oxide materials inhibited contact

surface

engineering

using

hydrophobic

organic

molecules,

such

as

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

5

ACS Applied Energy Materials 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 6 of 42

61

between water and the oxide surface, resulting in a reduced amount of residual lithium

62

compounds forming on the surface. As a result, hydrophobic Ni-rich oxide materials

63

remarkably showed negligible changes in the initial capacity fading, cycle performance,

64

and rate capability even after storage in humid air for two weeks.

65 66

Experimental Section

67

Synthesis. LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 powders were synthesized through a coprecipitation

68

method. NaOH was used to control the pH of an aqueous solution that dissolved

69

NiSO4∙6H2O, CoSO4∙7H2O, and MnSO4∙H2O with the molar ratio of Ni:Co:Mn = 8:1:1.

70

NH4OH was used as a chelating agent. LiOH were mixed with the dried precipitates (the

71

molar ratio of Li/TM = 1.03). The mixture was then heated at 800 °C for 10 hours in O2.

72

The heating rate and O2 flow rate were 5 °C min‒1 and 0.5 L min‒1, respectively. To obtain

73

hydrophobic

74

average

75

polydimethylsiloxane (Alfa-Aesar, average molecular weight = 410 g mol‒1) were mixed

materials,

molecular

hydroxy-terminated

weight

=

550

g

polydimethylsiloxane mol‒1)

and

(Sigma-Aldrich,

trimethylsiloxy-terminated

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

6

Page 7 of 42 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Applied Energy Materials

76

with LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 powders, followed by heating the mixture in Ar at 230 °C for 9

77

hours using a sealed reactor.

78 79

Storage experiment. To demonstrate the role of water in the formation of residual lithium

80

compounds, LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 powders were stored in a continuous flow reactor for 24

81

hours. Dry CO2 (99.999%), humid CO2, and humid inert Ar gases flowed through the

82

reactor. The RH of the humid CO2 and humid Ar flows was ca. 74%. In addition, bare and

83

PDMS(-OH)-grafted LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 powders were stored in a humidity chamber at

84

50% RH and 25 °C to examine their electrochemical performances.

85 86

Material characterization. The XRD patterns of the powders were acquired using a D2

87

Phaser with Cu-Kα radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å) operated in the 2θ range of 10° – 80°. SEM

88

was performed using a field emission scanning electronic microscope (Carl Zeiss,

89

Auriga). TEM and EDS data were collected using a Cs-corrected scanning transmission

90

electron microscope (JEOL Ltd, JEM-ARM200F). Cross-sectional TEM specimens were

91

prepared with a FIB system. Before FIB milling, samples were coated with carbon and

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

7

ACS Applied Energy Materials 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 8 of 42

92

platinum. FT-IR spectra were collected on a FT-IR spectrometer (Bruker, TENSOR27).

93

TGA was performed with a simultaneous DTA/TGA analyzer (TA instruments, DTA) under

94

an air atmosphere with a heating rate of 10 °C min‒1. Contact angles were measured with

95

a contact angle meter (KRUSS, DSA100). Pellets were prepared using 0.3 g of powders

96

at 45 MPa for 30 minutes for the contact angle measurements. TOF-SIMS analyses were

97

performed on a TOF-SIMS 5 system with a Bi+ primary ion beam source (ION-TOF

98

GmbH, Germany). A pulsed 25 keV Bi+ beam was used as an analysis source. A 14.5

99

keV Cs+ (negative mode) ion beam was used for sputtering with a raster size of 200 μm

100

× 200 μm. Depth profiles were obtained with a raster size of 50 μm × 50 μm. Titrations

101

were carried out with a pH meter (Thermo Fischer, ORION STAR A211). For a titration,

102

1.5 g of LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 powders were washed in distilled water for one hour. A 0.03

103

N HCl solution was used as a titrant.

104 105

Electrochemical characterization. Samples of active materials were mixed with carbon

106

black (Super P) and polyvinylidene fluoride in a weight ratio of 8:1:1. The slurry was

107

casted onto an Al foil current collector. The mass loading of active materials was 2.2–2.4

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

8

Page 9 of 42 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Applied Energy Materials

108

mg cm−2. The cycle performance of LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 was evaluated in a voltage range

109

of 3.0−4.4 V vs Li/Li+ at 0.5 C rate (100 mA g−1) after precycling at 0.1 C rate.

110

Galvanostatic experiments were carried out using 2032 coin cells with a Li metal and 1.3

111

M LiPF6 in ethylene carbonate:ethyl-methyl carbonate:dimethyl carbonate (3:4:3 volume

112

ratio, Soulbrain Co. Ltd.) at 30 °C.

113 114

Results and Discussion

115

LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 powders were obtained through a co-precipitation method. Figure S1

116

shows the X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image

117

of the LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 powders. This reveals that the LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 powders

118

were 2‒4 µm in size and had no impurities. In order to investigate the role of water in the

119

formation of residual lithium compounds, we compared the formation of residual lithium

120

compounds on the surface after storage in three different atmospheres: (i) dry CO2

121

without H2O, (ii) humid CO2 with a relative humidity (RH) of ca. 74%, and (iii) humid inert

122

Ar with a relative humidity (RH) of ca. 74%. Figure 1a shows the magnified SEM image

123

of a bare LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 particle, the surface of which is clean and smooth. We stored

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

9

ACS Applied Energy Materials 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 10 of 42

124

these fresh LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 powders in dry CO2, humid CO2 and humid inert Ar

125

atmospheres for 24 hours. We then observed remarkable difference in their SEM images,

126

as shown in Figure 1b, 1c, and 1d. While the surfaces of LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 stored in dry

127

CO2 and humid Ar remained smooth after the storage (Figure 1b and 1c), a rough surface

128

was observed on the LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 stored in humid CO2 (Figure 1d).

129

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

10

Page 11 of 42 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Applied Energy Materials

130 131

Figure 1. SEM images of a bare LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 particle: (a) before storage, (b) after

132

storage in dry CO2 for one day, (c) after storage in humid inert Ar for one day, and (d)

133

after storage in humid CO2 for one day. (e) The amounts of residual lithium compounds

134

on the LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 surface measured from titration.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

11

ACS Applied Energy Materials 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 12 of 42

135 136

The small particles that formed on the surface are known to be residual lithium compounds.13, 30

137

This reveals that residual lithium formed only in a humid CO2 environment. We also

138

performed pH titration to measure changes in the amount of residual lithium compounds

139

before and after the storage. As shown in Figure 1e, the total amount of residual lithium

140

compounds substantially increased after storage in humid CO2, whereas negligible

141

increases in residual lithium compounds were measured after storage in dry CO2 and in

142

humid Ar. This is consistent with the SEM results in Figure 1, and this implies that both

143

water and CO2 are essential for the formation of residual lithium compounds at room

144

temperature. Therefore, it is anticipated that the hydrophobic surface of Ni-rich layered

145

oxides suppresses the formation of residual lithium compounds because the hydrophobic

146

surface inhibits contact between water and Ni-rich layered oxides, as shown in Figure 2.

147

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

12

Page 13 of 42 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Applied Energy Materials

148 149

Figure 2. Schematic concept of hydrophobic Ni-rich layered oxides.

150 151

We obtained the hydrophobic LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 powders through surface engineering

152

using hydrophobic organic molecules, such as the vapor deposition of hydroxy-terminated

153

PDMS (denoted as PDMS(-OH)). PDMS is known as a hydrophobic molecule.46-50 When

154

the mixture of LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 and PDMS was heated in a sealed reactor at 230 °C,

155

vaporized PDMS reacted with the LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 surface, forming M-O-Si bonding

156

(M = transition metals such as Ni, Co, and Mn).51-52 In more detail, the hydroxyl functional

157

groups of PDMS reacted with the hydroxyl groups on the oxide surface through a

158

condensation reaction with loss of H2O. LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 powders were grafted with

159

two different amounts of hydroxy-terminated PDMS: ca. 4 wt% and ca. 5 wt% PDMS(-

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

13

ACS Applied Energy Materials 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 14 of 42

160

OH)-grafted LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2, as shown in the thermogravimetric analysis (TGA)

161

profiles (Figure 3). Figure 4a shows the cross-sectional scanning transmission electron

162

microscopy (STEM) and the corresponding energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS)

163

mapping images of ca. 4 wt% PDMS(-OH)-grafted LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2. Cross-sectional

164

STEM specimens were obtained using a focused ion beam (FIB) system. The STEM

165

image shows that a thin layer was uniformly coated on the LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 surface. Si

166

atoms were observed in the thin coating layer, as shown in the corresponding EDS

167

mapping image. This implies that the thin coating layer is PDMS because PDMS contains

168

Si atoms. The uniform coating of PDMS is also supported by the SEM images of PDMS(-

169

OH)-grafted LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 particles (Figure S2).

170

In addition, we obtained the EDS line profiles of Si and Ni atoms near the

171

LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 surface to estimate the thickness of the PDMS coating layers. As

172

shown in Figures 4c and 4d, the thicknesses of PDMS coating layers were approximately

173

30 nm and 50 nm for ca. 4 wt% and ca. 5 wt% PDMS(-OH)-grafted LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2

174

particles, respectively. Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) analysis also

175

supports that PDMS molecules were coated on the LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 surface. As shown

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

14

Page 15 of 42 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Applied Energy Materials

176

in Figure 5, the characteristic IR bands of PDMS were observed in the IR spectra of 4

177

wt% PDMS(-OH)-grafted and 5 wt% PDMS(-OH)-grafted LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 powders,

178

which are located near 1014 cm-1 and 1087 cm-1 for Si-O-Si and near 799 cm-1 and 1258

179

cm-1 for CH3-Si.53-54

180

181 182

Figure 3. TGA profiles of bare, PDMS(-CH3)-grafted, 4 wt% PDMS(-OH)-grafted, and 5

183

wt% PDMS(-OH)-grafted LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 powders.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

15

ACS Applied Energy Materials 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 16 of 42

184 185

Figure 4. Cross-sectional STEM and EDS mapping images of (a) 4 wt% PDMS(-OH)-

186

grafted and (b) PDMS(-CH3)-grafted LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2. EDS line profiles of (c) 4 wt%

187

and (d) 5 wt% PDMS(-OH)-grafted LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 powders.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

16

Page 17 of 42 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Applied Energy Materials

188

189 190

Figure 5. FT-IR spectra of bare, PDMS(-CH3)-grafted, 4 wt% PDMS(-OH)-grafted, and 5

191

wt% PDMS(-OH)-grafted LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 powder samples.

192 193 194

Moreover, we performed the vapor deposition of trimethylsiloxy-terminated PDMS

195

(denoted as PDMS(-CH3)) on the LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 surface to demonstrate the chemical

196

bonding between PDMS(-OH) and LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2. 4 wt% of PDMS(-CH3) was mixed

197

with LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 powders, followed by heating the mixture at 230 °C. In contrast

198

to PDMS(-OH), negligible amount of PDMS(-CH3) was coated on the LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

17

ACS Applied Energy Materials 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 18 of 42

199

surface, as shown in the TGA profile of PDMS(-CH3)-grafted LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 (Figure

200

3). This is also supported by the cross-sectional STEM and EDS mapping images and

201

FT-IR spectrum of PDMS(-CH3)-grafted LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2. As shown in the cross-

202

sectional STEM and EDS mapping images of PDMS(-CH3)-grafted LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2,

203

Si was not observed on the LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 surface (Figure 4b). In addition, the

204

characteristic IR bands of PDMS were faintly observed in the IR spectrum of PDMS(-

205

CH3)-grafted LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 powders (Figure 5). Therefore, this implies that PDMS(-

206

OH) was grafted on the LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 surface through the M-O-Si bonding (M =

207

transition metals such as Ni, Co, and Mn) whereas PDMS(-CH3) was not grafted on

208

LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2. This is attributed to the fact that PDMS(-CH3) does not have the

209

hydroxyl functional groups that can react with the hydroxyl groups on the oxide surface.

210

The contact angles of water droplets were measured to evaluate the hydrophobicity of

211

the PDMS(-OH)-grafted LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2. Figure 6 compares the contact angles of

212

bare and PDMS(-OH)-grafted LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 pellets. In the case of bare

213

LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2, the pellet absorbed a water droplet as soon as it fell. Consequently,

214

we were not able to measure the contact angle of bare LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2, as shown in

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

18

Page 19 of 42 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Applied Energy Materials

215

Figure 6a. This implies that the surface of bare LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 is hydrophilic.

216

However, the contact angle of PDMS(-OH)-grafted LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 increased with

217

increasing amounts of the PDMS coating, as shown in Figure 6b and 6c. The contact

218

angles of ca. 4 wt% and ca. 5 wt% PDMS(-OH)-grafted LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 were 55° and

219

86°, respectively. This reveals that PDMS(-OH)-grafted LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 powders are

220

hydrophobic.

221

hydrophobic with increasing amounts of the PDMS coating.

Moreover,

PDMS(-OH)-grafted

LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2

became

more

222

Time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (TOF-SIMS) analysis was performed

223

to demonstrate the role of a hydrophobic surface in the formation of residual lithium

224

compounds. Bare, ca. 4 wt% PDMS(-OH)-grafted, and ca. 5 wt% PDMS(-OH)-grafted

225

LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 powders were stored in a humidity chamber at 50% RH and 25 °C for

226

one week. Then, the TOF-SIMS depth profiles of the LiCO3- ions were obtained, as shown

227

in Figure 7. Whereas we observed a large amount of LiCO3- ions near the bare

228

LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 surface after the storage, negligible amounts of LiCO3- ions were

229

measured near the surfaces of ca. 4 wt% and ca. 5 wt% PDMS(-OH)-grafted

230

LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2.

This

indicates

that

PDMS(-OH)-grafted

LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

19

ACS Applied Energy Materials 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 20 of 42

231

suppressed the formation of residual lithium compounds on the surface because the

232

hydrophobic surface inhibited contact between LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 and water.

233

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

20

Page 21 of 42 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Applied Energy Materials

234 235

Figure 6. Contact angles of (a) bare, (b) 4 wt% PDMS(-OH)-grafted, and (c) 5 wt%

236

PDMS(-OH)-grafted LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 pellets.

237 238

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

21

ACS Applied Energy Materials 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 22 of 42

239 240

Figure 7. TOF-SIMS depth profiles of LiCO3- for bare, 4 wt% PDMS(-OH)-grafted, and 5

241

wt% PDMS(-OH)-grafted LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 powder samples after storage in a humidity

242

chamber at 50% RH and 25 °C for one week.

243 244

Figures 8 and S3 compare the cycle performances and voltage profiles of bare, ca. 4

245

wt% PDMS(-OH)-grafted, and ca. 5 wt% PDMS(-OH)-grafted LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2

246

electrodes before and after storage in a humidity chamber at 50% RH and 25 °C. In the

247

case of the bare LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2, we observed substantially reduced initial reversible

248

capacity and poorer cycle performance after the storage. This is attributed to the fact that

249

residual lithium compounds continuously increased cell impedance during cycling

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

22

Page 23 of 42 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Applied Energy Materials

250

because of their irreversible decomposition. However, remarkably, negligible changes in

251

the initial reversible capacity and cycle performance over 200 cycles were observed for

252

the PDMS(-OH)-grafted LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 even after storage in humid air for two weeks.

253

This is due to the fact that the hydrophobic surface of PDMS(-OH)-grafted

254

LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 suppressed the formation of residual lithium compounds. Table S1

255

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

23

ACS Applied Energy Materials 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 24 of 42

256 257

Figure 8. Cycle performances of (a) bare, (b) 4 wt% PDMS(-OH)-grafted, and (c) 5 wt%

258

PDMS(-OH)-grafted LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 electrodes at a 0.5 C rate (100 mA g−1) before

259

and after storage in a humidity chamber at 50% RH and 25 °C.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

24

Page 25 of 42 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Applied Energy Materials

260 261

Figure 9. Rate performances of (a) bare, (b) 4 wt% PDMS(-OH)-grafted, and (c) 5 wt%

262

PDMS(-OH)-grafted LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 electrodes before and after storage in a humidity

263

chamber at 50 % RH and 25 °C.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

25

ACS Applied Energy Materials 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 26 of 42

264 265

summarized the capacity retentions of bare, 4 wt%, and 5 wt%-PDMS(-OH)-grafted

266

electrodes before and after storage in humid air. Moreover, we compared the rate

267

performance of bare, ca. 4 wt% PDMS(-OH)-grafted, and ca. 5 wt% PDMS(-OH)-grafted

268

LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 electrodes before and after storage (Figure 9). Before the storage,

269

bare LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 delivered 77.3% of the reversible capacity at 5 C rate compared

270

to the reversible capacity at 0.1 C rate. However, after storage for two weeks, bare

271

LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 delivered only 66.9% of the reversible capacity at 5 C rate compared to the

272

reversible capacity at 0.1 C rate. This reveals that the cell impedance of bare LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2

273

increased during storage, resulting in a ca. 10% loss of the reversible capacity at 5 C rate after the

274

storage. However, PDMS(-OH)-grafted LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 showed negligible changes in rate

275

performance before and after the storage. This is consistent with the cycle performances of bare,

276

ca. 4 wt% PDMS(-OH)-grafted, and ca. 5 wt% PDMS(-OH)-grafted LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2

277

electrodes (Figure 8).

278 279

Conclusions

280

We introduced hydrophobic Ni-rich layered oxides as promising cathodes for Li-ion

281

batteries. The hydrophobic surface of Ni-rich layered oxides was obtained through

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

26

Page 27 of 42 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Applied Energy Materials

282

surface engineering using hydrophobic organic molecules, such as PDMS. The hydroxy-

283

terminated PDMS reacted with the hydroxyl group on the LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 surface

284

through a condensation reaction with loss of H2O at 230 °C. STEM and EDS analyses

285

revealed that PDMS layers were uniformly coated on the LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 surface. The

286

thicknesses of the PDMS coating layers were 30 ‒ 50 nm, depending on the weight ratio

287

of PDMS and LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2. Through the comparison of the LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2

288

surface after storage in various atmospheres, we demonstrated that H2O is essential for

289

the formation of residual lithium compounds at room temperature. The hydrophobic

290

surface of LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 prevented contact between H2O and LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2.

291

Therefore, hydrophobic LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 suppressed the formation of residual lithium

292

compounds in humid air, leading to negligible surface degradation even during storage in

293

humid air for two weeks. As a result, hydrophobic PDMS(-OH)-grafted LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2

294

showed excellent electrochemical performance even after storage in humid air for two

295

weeks.

296

We also believe that hydrophobic surface modification can improve the storage stability

297

and electrochemical performance of other H2O-sensitive cathode materials, such as

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

27

ACS Applied Energy Materials 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 28 of 42

298

lithium-rich transition metal oxides for Li-ion batteries and sodium transition metal oxides

299

for Na-ion batteries.

300 301 302

■ ASSOCIATED CONTENT

303

Supporting Information

304

The supporting information is available free of charge via the Internet at

305

http://pubs.acs.org.

306

XRD patterns, SEM images, voltage profiles, and the table of capacity retention.

307 308

■ AUTHOR INFORMATION

309

Corresponding Author

310

* E-mail : [email protected]

311

Notes

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

28

Page 29 of 42 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

312

ACS Applied Energy Materials

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

313 314

■ ACKNOWLEDGMENT

315

This work was supported in part by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)

316

grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (2019R1A2B5B03070673 and NRF-

317

2018R1A5A1024127), and by Technology Development Program to Solve Climate

318

Changes (NRF-2018M1A2A2063345) through NRF funded by Ministry of Science and

319

ICT.

320 321

■ REFERENCES

322

(1) Manthiram, A.; Knight, J. C.; Myung, S.-T.; Oh, S.-M.; Sun, Y.-K., Nickel-Rich and

323

Lithium-Rich Layered Oxide Cathodes: Progress and Perspectives. Adv. Energy Mater.

324

2016, 6, 1501010.

325 326

(2) Whittingham, M. S., Lithium Batteries and Cathode Materials. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 4271-4302.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

29

ACS Applied Energy Materials 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

327 328

329

Page 30 of 42

(3) Ellis, B. L.; Lee, K. T.; Nazar, L. F., Positive Electrode Materials for Li-Ion and LiBatteries. Chem. Mater. 2010, 22, 691-714.

(4) Myung, S.-T.; Maglia, F.; Park, K.-J.; Yoon, C. S.; Lamp, P.; Kim, S.-J.; Sun, Y.-K.,

330

Nickel-Rich

Layered

Cathode

Materials

for

Automotive

Lithium-Ion

331

Achievements and Perspectives. ACS Energy Lett. 2017, 2, 196–223.

Batteries:

332

(5) Lu, J.; Chen, Z.; Ma, Z.; Pan, F.; Curtiss, L. A.; Amine, K., The role of nanotechnology

333

in the development of battery materials for electric vehicles. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2016, 11,

334

1031-1038.

335

(6) Weigel, T.; Schipper, F.; Erickson, E. M.; Susai, F. A.; Markovsky, B.; Aurbach, D.,

336

Structural and Electrochemical Aspects of LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 Cathode Materials Doped

337

by Various Cations. ACS Energy Lett. 2019, 4, 508–516.

338

(7) Noh, H.-J.; Youn, S.; Yoon, C. S.; Sun, Y.-K., Comparison of the structural and

339

electrochemical properties of layered Li[NixCoyMnz]O2 (x = 1/3, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8 and 0.85)

340

cathode material for lithium-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 2013, 233, 121-130.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

30

Page 31 of 42 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Applied Energy Materials

341

(8) Hy, S.; Liu, H.; Zhang, M.; Qian, D.; Hwang, B.-J.; Meng, Y. S., Performance and

342

design considerations for lithium excess layered oxide positive electrode materials for

343

lithium ion batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, 9, 1931-1954.

344

(9) Zou, L.; Zhao, W.; Liu, Z.; Jia, H.; Zheng, J.; Wang, G.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, J.-G.;

345

Wang, C., Revealing Cycling Rate-Dependent Structure Evolution in Ni-Rich Layered

346

Cathode Materials. ACS Energy Lett. 2018, 3, 2433–2440.

347

(10) Liu, W.; Oh, P.; Liu, X.; Lee, M.-J.; Cho, W.; Chae, S.; Kim, Y.; Cho, J., Nickel-Rich

348

Layered Lithium Transition-Metal Oxide for High-Energy Lithium-Ion Batteries. Angew.

349

Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 4440-4457.

350

(11) Grenier, A.; Liu, H.; Wiaderek, K. M.; Lebens-Higgins, Z. W.; Borkiewicz, O. J.;

351

Piper, L. F. J.; Chupas, P. J.; Chapman, K. W., Reaction Heterogeneity in

352

LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 Induced by Surface Layer. Chem. Mater. 2017, 29, 7345-7352.

353 354

(12) Manthiram, A.; Song, B.; Li, W., A Perspective on Nickel-rich Layered Oxide Cathodes for Lithium-ion Batteries. Energy Storage Mater. 2017, 6, 125-139.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

31

ACS Applied Energy Materials 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 32 of 42

355

(13) Shizuka, K.; Kiyohara, C.; Shima, K.; Takeda, Y., Effect of CO2 on Layered

356

Li1+zNi1−x−yCoxMyO2 (M=Al, Mn) Cathode Materials for Lithium Ion Batteries. J. Power

357

Sources 2007, 166, 233-238.

358

(14) Dupré, N.; Martin, J.-F.; Oliveri, J.; Soudan, P.; Yamada, A.; Kanno, R.; Guyomard,

359

D., Relationship between Surface Chemistry and Electrochemical Behavior of

360

LiNi1/2Mn1/2O2 Positive Electrode in a Lithium-Ion Battery. J. Power Sources 2011, 196,

361

4791-4800.

362

(15) Liu, H. S.; Zhang, Z. R.; Gong, Z. L.; Yang, Y., Origin of Deterioration for LiNiO2

363

Cathode Material during Storage in Air. Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 2004, 7, A190-

364

A193.

365

(16) Bi, Y.; Wang, T.; Liu, M.; Du, R.; Yang, W.; Liu, Z.; Peng, Z.; Liu, Y.; Wang, D.;

366

Sun, X., Stability of Li2CO3 in Cathode of Lithium Ion Battery and its Influence on

367

Electrochemical Performance. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 19233-19237.

368

(17) Faenza, N. V.; Bruce, L.; Lebens-Higgins, Z. W.; Plitz, I.; Pereira, N.; Piper, L. F.

369

J.; Amatucci, G. G., Growth of Ambient Induced Surface Impurity Species on Layered

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

32

Page 33 of 42 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Applied Energy Materials

370

Positive Electrode Materials and Impact on Electrochemical Performance. J.

371

Electrochem. Soc. 2017, 164, A3727-A3741.

372

(18) Choi, N.-S.; Han, J.-G.; Ha, S.-Y.; Park, I.; Back, C.-K., Recent Advances in the

373

Electrolytes for Interfacial Stability of High-Voltage Cathodes in Lithium-ion Batteries.

374

RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 2732-2748.

375

(19) Zhuang, G. V.; Chen, G.; Shim, J.; Song, X.; Ross, P. N.; Richardson, T. J., Li2CO3

376

in LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 Cathodes and its Effects on Capacity and Power. J. Power Sources

377

2004, 134, 293-297.

378 379

380 381

(20) Self, J.; Aiken, C. P.; Petibon, R.; Dahn, J. R., Survey of Gas Expansion in Li-Ion NMC Pouch Cells. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2015, 162, A796-A802.

(21) Kim, J.; Lee, H.; Cha, H.; Yoon, M.; Park, M.; Cho, J., Prospect and Reality of NiRich Cathode for Commercialization. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1702028.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

33

ACS Applied Energy Materials 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 34 of 42

382

(22) Cho, D.-H.; Jo, C.-H.; Cho, W.; Kim, Y.-J.; Yashiro, H.; Sun, Y.-K.; Myung, S.-T.,

383

Effect of Residual Lithium Compounds on Layer Ni-Rich Li[Ni0.7Mn0.3]O2. J. Electrochem.

384

Soc. 2014, 161, A920-A926.

385

(23) Renfrew, S. E.; McCloskey, B. D., Residual Lithium Carbonate Predominantly

386

Accounts for First Cycle CO2 and CO Outgassing of Li-Stoichiometric and Li-Rich Layered

387

Transition-Metal Oxides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 17853-17860.

388

(24) Mahne, N.; Renfrew, S. E.; McCloskey, B. D.; Freunberger, S. A., Electrochemical

389

Oxidation of Lithium Carbonate Generates Singlet Oxygen. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018,

390

57, 5529-5533.

391

(25) Hatsukade, T.; Schiele, A.; Hartmann, P.; Brezesinski, T.; Janek, J., Origin of

392

Carbon Dioxide Evolved during Cycling of Nickel-Rich Layered NCM Cathodes. ACS

393

Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 38892-38899.

394

(26) Liu, H.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, J., Investigation and Improvement on the Storage

395

Property of LiNi0.8Co0.2O2 as a Cathode Material for Lithium-ion Batteries. J. Power

396

Sources 2006, 162, 644-650.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

34

Page 35 of 42 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Applied Energy Materials

397

(27) Kim, J.; Hong, Y.; Ryu, K. S.; Kim, M. G.; Cho, J., Washing Effect of a

398

LiNi0.83Co0.15Al0.02O2 Cathode in Water. Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 2006, 9, A19-A23.

399

(28) Xiong, X.; Wang, Z.; Yue, P.; Guo, H.; Wu, F.; Wang, J.; Li, X., Washing Effects on

400

Electrochemical Performance and Storage Characteristics of LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 as

401

Cathode Material for Lithium-ion Batteries. J. Power Sources 2013, 222, 318-325.

402

(29) Xu, S.; Du, C.; Xu, X.; Han, G.; Zuo, P.; Cheng, X.; Ma, Y.; Yin, G., A Mild Surface

403

Washing Method Using Protonated Polyaniline for Ni-rich LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 Material of

404

Lithium Ion Batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2017, 248, 534-540.

405

(30) You, Y.; Celio, H.; Li, J.; Dolocan, A.; Manthiram, A., Modified High-Nickel

406

Cathodes with Stable Surface Chemistry Against Ambient Air for Lithium-Ion Batteries.

407

Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 6480-6485.

408

(31) Duan, J.; Hu, G.; Cao, Y.; Tan, C.; Wu, C.; Du, K.; Peng, Z., Enhanced

409

Electrochemical Performance and Storage Property of LiNi0.815Co0.15Al0.035O2 via Al

410

Gradient Doping. J. Power Sources 2016, 326, 322-330.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

35

ACS Applied Energy Materials 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 36 of 42

411

(32) Oh, P.; Song, B.; Li, W.; Manthiram, A., Overcoming the Chemical Instability on

412

Exposure to Air of Ni-rich Layered Oxide Cathodes by Coating with Spinel LiMn1.9Al0.1O4.

413

J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 5839-5841.

414

(33) Lee, M.-J.; Noh, M.; Park, M.-H.; Jo, M.; Kim, H.; Nam, H.; Cho, J., The Role of

415

Nanoscale-range Vanadium Treatment in LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 Cathode Materials for Li-

416

ion Batteries at Elevated Temperatures. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 13453-13460.

417

(34) Jo, C.-H.; Cho, D.-H.; Noh, H.-J.; Yashiro, H.; Sun, Y.-K.; Myung, S. -T., An

418

Effective Method to Reduce Residual Lithium Compounds on Ni-rich Li[Ni0.6Co0.2Mn0.2]O2

419

Active Material using a Phosphoric Acid Derived Li3PO4 Nanolayer. Nano Res. 2015, 8,

420

1464-1479.

421 422

(35) Xiong, X.; Wang, Z.; Yan, G.; Guo, H.; Li, X., Role of V2O5 Coating on LiNiO2-based Materials for Lithium Ion Battery. J. Power Sources 2014, 245, 183-193.

423

(36) Zhao, J.; Wang, Z.; Wang, J.; Guo, H.; Li, X.; Yan, G.; Gui, W.; Chen, N., The Role

424

of a MnO2 Functional Layer on the Surface of Ni-rich Cathode Materials: Towards

425

Enhanced Chemical Stability on Exposure to Air. Ceram. Int. 2018, 44, 13341-13348.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

36

Page 37 of 42 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

426

ACS Applied Energy Materials

(37) Chae, S.; Soon, J.; Jeong, H.; Lee, T. J.; Ryu, J. H.; Oh, S. M., Passivating Film

427

Artificially

Built

on

LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4

by

Molecular

Layer

Deposition

428

(Pentafluorophenylpropyl)trimethoxysilane. J. Power Sources 2018, 392, 159-167.

of

429

(38) Sun, Z.; Li, Z.; Gao, L.; Zhao, X.; Han, D.; Gan, S.; Guo, S.; Niu, L., Grafting

430

Benzenediazonium Tetrafluoroborate onto LiNixCoyMnzO2 Materials Achieves Subzero-

431

Temperature High-Capacity Lithium-Ion Storage via a Diazonium Soft-Chemistry Method.

432

Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 9, 1802946.

433

(39) Cho, J.-H.; Park, J.-H.; Lee, M.-H.; Song, H.-K.; Lee, S.-Y., A Polymer Electrolyte-

434

skinned Active Material Strategy Toward High-voltage Lithium Ion Batteries: a Polyimide-

435

coated LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4 Spinel Cathode Material Case. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 7124-

436

7131.

437

(40) Park, J.-H.; Cho, J.-H.; Kim, S.-B.; Kim, W.-S.; Lee, S.-Y.; Lee, S.-Y., A Novel Ion-

438

conductive Protection Skin based on Polyimide Gel Polymer Electrolyte: Application to

439

Nanoscale Coating Layer of High Voltage LiNi1/3Co1/3Mn1/3O2 Cathode Materials for

440

Lithium-ion Batteries. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 12574-12581.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

37

ACS Applied Energy Materials 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 38 of 42

441

(41) Park, J.-H.; Kim, J.-S.; Shim, E.-G.; Park, K.-W.; Hong, Y. T.; Lee, Y.-S.; Lee, S.-

442

Y., Polyimide Gel Polymer Electrolyte-nanoencapsulated LiCoO2 Cathode Materials for

443

High-voltage Li-ion Batteries. Electrochem. Commun. 2010, 12, 1099-1102.

444

(42) Kim, M. C.; Kim, S. H.; Aravindan, V.; Kim, W. S.; Lee, S. Y.; Lee, Y. S., Ultrathin

445

Polyimide Coating for a Spinel LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4 Cathode and Its Superior Lithium Storage

446

Properties under Elevated Temperature Conditions. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2013, 160,

447

A1003-A1008.

448

(43) Piper, D. M.; Yersak, T. A.; Son, S.-B.; Kim, S. C.; Kang, C. S.; Oh, K. H.; Ban, C.;

449

Dillon, A. C.; Lee, S.-H., Conformal Coatings of Cyclized-PAN for Mechanically Resilient

450

Si nano-Composite Anodes. Adv. Energy Mater. 2013, 3, 697-702.

451

(44) Xu, M.; Chen, Z.; Zhu, H.; Yan, X.; Li, L.; Zhao, Q., Mitigating capacity fade by

452

constructing highly ordered mesoporous Al2O3/polyacene double-shelled architecture in

453

Li-rich cathode materials. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 13933-13945.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

38

Page 39 of 42 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Applied Energy Materials

454

(45) Chen, Z.; Xu, M.; Zhu, H.; Xie, T.; Wang, W.; Zhao, Q., Enhanced electrochemical

455

performance of polyacene coated LiMn2O3.95F0.05 for lithium ion batteries. Appl. Surf. Sci.

456

2013, 286, 177-183.

457

(46) Wooh, S.; Encinas, N.; Vollmer, D.; Butt, H.-J., Stable Hydrophobic Metal-Oxide

458

Photocatalysts via Grafting Polydimethylsiloxane Brush. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1604637.

459

(47) Jin, M.; Feng, X.; Xi, J.; Zhai, J.; Cho, K.; Feng, L.; Jiang, L., Super-Hydrophobic

460

PDMS Surface with Ultra-Low Adhesive Force. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2005, 26,

461

1805-1809.

462

(48) Chen, C.-H.; Njagi, E. C.; Sun, S.-P.; Genuino, H.; Hu, B.; Suib, S. L., Hydrophobic

463

Polymer-Coated Metal Oxide Catalysts for Effective Low-Temperature Oxidation of CO

464

under Moisture-Rich Conditions. Chem. Mater. 2010, 22, 3313-3315.

465

(49) Jindasuwan, S.; Sujaridworakun, P.; Jinawath, S.; Supothina, S., Effect of Heat

466

Treatment

Temperature

on

Surface

Topography

and

Hydrophobicity

of

467

Polydimethylsiloxane/Titanium Oxide Hybrid Films. Macromol. Symp. 2008, 264, 90-94.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

39

ACS Applied Energy Materials 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 40 of 42

468

(50) Tsougeni, K.; Tserepi, A.; Boulousis, G.; Constantoudis, V.; Gogolides, E., Control

469

of Nanotexture and Wetting Properties of Polydimethylsiloxane from Very Hydrophobic to

470

Super-Hydrophobic by Plasma Processing. Plasma Process Polym. 2007, 4, 398-405.

471 472

(51) Yuan, J.; Liu, X.; Akbulut, O.; Hu, J.; Suib, S. L.; Kong, J.; Stellacci, F., Superwetting Nanowire Membranes for Selective Absorption. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2008, 3, 332-336.

473

(52) Yang, J.; Pi, P.; Wen, X.; Zheng, D.; Xu, M.; Cheng, J.; Yang, Z., A Novel Method

474

to Fabricate Superhydrophobic Surfaces based on Well-defined Mulberry-like Particles

475

and Self-assembly of Polydimethylsiloxane. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2009, 255, 3507-3512.

476

(53) Kim, B.-Y.; Hong, L.-Y.; Chung, Y.-M.; Kim, D.-P.; Lee, C.-S., Solvent-Resistant

477

PDMS Microfluidic Devices with Hybrid Inorganic/Organic Polymer Coatings. Adv. Funct.

478

Mater. 2009, 19, 3796-3803.

479

(54) Liu, G.; Xiangli, F.; Wei, W.; Liu, S.; Jin, W., Improved Performance of

480

PDMS/Ceramic Composite Pervaporation Membranes by ZSM-5 Homogeneously

481

Dispersed in PDMS via a Surface Graft/coating Approach. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 174, 495-

482

503.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

40

Page 41 of 42 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Applied Energy Materials

483

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

41

ACS Applied Energy Materials 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

484

Page 42 of 42

Table of Contents

485

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

42