Subscriber access provided by University of Newcastle, Australia
Article
Inlet Particle-Sorting Cyclone for the Enhancement of PM2.5 Separation Pengbo Fu, Fei Wang, Xue-Jing Yang, Liang Ma, Xin Cui, and Hualin Wang Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b04418 • Publication Date (Web): 11 Jan 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on January 11, 2017
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
Environmental Science & Technology is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 24
1 2
Environmental Science & Technology
Inlet Particle-Sorting Cyclone for the Enhancement of PM2.5 Separation
3 4
PENG-BO FU†, FEI WANG†, XUE-JING YANG†, LIANG MA†, XIN CUI‡, HUA-LIN
5
WANG†*
6
†State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Environmental Risk Assessment and Control on
7
Chemical Process, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200237, P. R.
8
China
9
‡Shanghai Huachang Environmental Protection Co. Ltd., Shanghai, 201611, P. R. China
10
*Corresponding author, E-mail: wanghl@ecust.edu.cn, Tel/Fax: +86-21-6425 1894
ACS Paragon Plus Environment 1
Environmental Science & Technology
11
For Table of Contents Only
12 13
ACS Paragon Plus Environment 2
Page 2 of 24
Page 3 of 24
Environmental Science & Technology
14
Abstract: Many cities are suffering from severe air pollution from fine particulate matter. Cyclone is
15
an effective separator for particulate pollutant but has low efficiency for those with an aerodynamic
16
diameter of 2.5 µm or less (PM2.5). In this research, four novel inlet particle-sorting cyclones were
17
first developed to enhance the separation of PM2.5. The energy consumption, overall separation
18
efficiency, particle grade efficiency , outlet particle concentration and size distribution were
19
compared with common cyclone (CM-C). It was found that the vertical reverse rotation cyclone
20
(VRR-C), which made the smaller particles enter cyclone from radially outer side and axially lower
21
side at the rectangular inlet, had the best separation performance, especially for PM2.5 separation.
22
The mean diameter of inlet particles was 15.7 µm and the particle concentration was 2000 mg/m3,
23
the overall separation efficiency of the VRR-C reached 98.3%, which was 6.4% higher than that of
24
CM-C. PM2.5 grade efficiency of the VRR-C exceeded 80%, which was 15%~20% higher than that
25
of CM-C. The PM2.5 content at the VRR-C outlet was 30.8 mg/m3, while that of CM-C was still
26
118.4 mg/m3. The novel inlet particle-sorting cyclone is an effective separation enhancement for
27
PM2.5 source control in the process of industrial production and environment protection.
28
Introduction
29
Particulate matter is the major medium that pollutes the atmospheric environment and does harm
30
to people’s health,1-3 especially the particles with an aerodynamic diameter of 2.5 µm or less
31
(PM2.5).4 These particles can enter the bronchi and disturb the gas exchange, which can result in
32
diseases such as asthma, bronchitis, lung dysfunction and angiocardiopathy.5 The hazardous
33
substances contained within PM2.5, such as harmful gases and heavy metals, can dissolve in the
34
blood through the bronchi and pulmonary alveoli, which poses a direct threat to human health.6,7
35
According to the investigation provided by the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2013, PM2.5 was
36
identified as a leading risk factor for global disease burden with an estimated 2.9 million attributable ACS Paragon Plus Environment 3
Environmental Science & Technology
37
deaths in the year 2013.8 PM2.5 can also influence the acid deposition and the chemical equilibrium
38
of air; as a result, fog and haze formed by polluted air reduces visibility, which impacts
39
transportation.9 In short, PM2.5 is one of the biggest challenges facing the modern world, and the
40
greatest difficulty is the low separation efficiency for these fine particles in industry.
41
The crux of PM2.5 control is source control in the process of industrial production, thus the
42
industrial capture and separation technology of fine particles is the key to solving this problem.5,10
43
The major methods of separating particles from industrial gas include electrostatic separation,11
44
settling separation,12 bag-type dust collection,13 and rotating centrifugal separation.14,15 However,
45
electrostatic separation incurs high operation costs and has a potential security risk; the devices used
46
in settling separation are always very large, with low efficiency and need a long settling time;
47
Bag-type dust collection is hard to maintain in stable operation for long periods and the maintenance
48
costs are very high. Therefore, with these technologies it will be difficult to obtain outstanding social
49
and economic benefits in fine particle separation, especially in the PM2.5 separation.
50
The cyclone is an important rotating centrifugal separation equipment that can effectively capture
51
and separate the particles in the gas.16,17 In addition, the cyclone has the advantages of small
52
structure size, enormous processing capacity, high separation efficiency, low energy consumption,
53
easy operation and maintenance and is suitable for long periods of operation.18 Therefore, the
54
cyclone has been widely used in various fields, such as in atmospheric pollution prevention and
55
treatment,19,20 industrial gas purification,21 process optimization,22 particle grading,23 and particle
56
sampling.24,25 However, the traditional cyclones usually have a larger cutting size and show low
57
separation efficiency for particles with a small size (PM2.5).
58
Many researchers have attempted to improve the separation efficiency of a cyclone by changing ACS Paragon Plus Environment 4
Page 4 of 24
Page 5 of 24
Environmental Science & Technology
59
the structural parameters, such as body diameter,26,27 inlet structure and size,28,29 vortex finder
60
structure and size,30 lengths of the underflow straight pipe,31 and structure of the dust hopper.32 Some
61
researchers attempted to enhance rotating centrifugal separation by improving the separable factors
62
of materials, for example, to reduce the viscosity of materials by adjusting the temperature.33 Other
63
researchers attempted to strengthen separation by introducing electric fields and magnetic fields
64
based on the electrical and magnetic properties of the materials.34,35 However, these studies focus on
65
the particle separation process as a whole; these techniques cannot extraordinarily improve the
66
separation efficiency for the small particles, which are difficult to separate; as such, they can do little
67
to face the challenge that more and more PM2.5 in the air is threatening the quality of our lives.
68
To the best of our knowledge, particulate matter is always composed of different sized particles;
69
the fine particles with a small size are hard to separate and capture is the main challenge for PM2.5
70
control. For rotating centrifugal separation, Wang et al. first found that the initial position on the inlet
71
section where particles enter the hydrocyclone influences the particle separation performance.36 Liu
72
et al. introduced a volute chamber with a pre-sedimentation function before the inlet and effectively
73
improved the classification efficiency for fine particles.37 Yang et al. found that particle
74
arrangements at the entrance strongly influence the motion and distribution of dispersed phase
75
particles by CFD simulations.38 Therefore, particle sorting to enhance the separation of fine particles
76
is practical and feasible, but there is still much work that needs to be performed for PM2.5 separation
77
enhancement in the atmospheric protection field.
78
In this research, we designed four types of novel inlet particle-sorting cyclones by combining the
79
sort function of a particle sorting classifier (PSC), which was reported in our previous studies.
80
Different sized particles are in an ordered arrangement at the outlet of a PSC. 39 By changing the type
ACS Paragon Plus Environment 5
Environmental Science & Technology
81
of connection between the cyclone and PSC, we can control the smaller particles enter the cyclone
82
from different positions at the inlet section of the cyclone. The results show that the inlet
83
particle-sorting cyclone (VRR-C), which makes the smaller particles enter the cyclone from the
84
radially outer side and the axially lower side of the inlet section, can effectively enhance the
85
separation of fine particles, especially of PM2.5. This research is of great significance for the
86
improvement of cyclone separation technology, as well as for the separation and capture of PM2.5 in
87
the environmental protection field.
88
Experimental section
89
Particle sorting classifiers (PSCs). The sorting regular of different sized particles at the outlet of
90
PSC is shown in Figure 1(a).39 For the purposes of this study, when the PSC makes the fluid medium
91
rotate in the clockwise direction around the axis of the cavity, we call it the positive rotation PSC
92
(PR-PSC), which is shown in Figure 1(c). When the PSC make the fluid medium rotate in the
93
reverse direction, we call it the reverse rotation PSC (RR-PSC), which is shown in Figure 1(d). The
94
height of the PSC (H) is 5 times as high as the rectangular inlet (a1), for the best sorting effects.39
95
Figure S1 illustrates the structure models of PR-PSC and RR-PSC, and Table S2 shows the geometry
96
parameters of PSCs.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment 6
Page 6 of 24
Page 7 of 24
Environmental Science & Technology
97 98
Figure 1. (a) The distribution of different sized particles at the outlet of PSC. The model of (b)
99
cyclone, (c) PR-PSC, (d) RR-PSC. The model and the regular of particle sorting at the inlet of (e)
100
CM-C, (f) PPR-C, (g) PRR-C, (h) VPR-C, (i) VRR-C.
101
Inlet particle-sorting cyclones. Four different types of inlet particle-sorting cyclones were
102
designed by changing the type of connection between the PSC and cyclone: (1) The PR-PSC and
103
cyclone were connected in a parallel way; they form the parallel positive rotation cyclone (PPR-C).
104
At the inlet section of the cyclone, the sorting regular of the different sized particles was that the
105
smaller particles were close to the radially inner side and the axially upper side, as shown in Figure
106
1(f); (2) The RR-PSC and cyclone were connected in a parallel way; they form the parallel reverse
107
rotation cyclone (PRR-C). The sorting regular was that the smaller particles were close to the
108
radially outer side and the axially upper side, as shown in Figure 1(g); (3) The PR-PSC and cyclone
109
were connected in a vertical way; they form the vertical positive rotation cyclone (VPR-C). The
110
sorting regular was that the smaller particles were close to the radially inner side and the axially
ACS Paragon Plus Environment 7
Environmental Science & Technology
111
lower side, as shown in Figure 1(h); (4) The RR-PSC and cyclone were connected in a vertical way;
112
they form the vertical reverse rotation cyclone (VRR-C). The sorting regular was that the smaller
113
particles were close to the radially outer side and the axially lower side, as shown in Figure 1(i). For
114
the common cyclone (CM-C), the particles at the inlet section are in a disordered state, as shown in
115
Figure 1(e).
116 117
Figure 2. The geometry parameters of the adopted mini-cyclone
118
The cyclone adopted in this research was a self-designed mini-cyclone that has high separation
119
accuracy for the fine particle. The body diameter of the mini-cyclone was 75 mm, the inlet was
ACS Paragon Plus Environment 8
Page 8 of 24
Page 9 of 24
Environmental Science & Technology
120
rectangular tangential inlet and the dust hopper was equipped with an anti-reentrainment cone, which
121
is used to reduce the back mixing of separated particles, thus improving the separation efficiency of
122
cyclone, the cone angle of anti-reentrainment cone was 90° and the proportion of effective flow area
123
was 30%. The cyclone was made of organic glass too. The geometry structure and parameters of the
124
mini-cyclone adopted in this research are shown in Figure 2.
125
Experimental equipment and procedure. A schematic diagram of the experimental setup is
126
additionally shown in Figure 3. Particles were transported into a cyclone by air in the form of
127
uniformly dispersed aerosols with a constant particle concentration of 2000 mg/m3; most of them
128
were captured into the dust hopper. In our experiments, we used a variable frequency motor
129
controlled discharge valve to add the fine particle, so the particle masses that entered the cyclone mi
130
can be obtained by the constant feeding rate and feeding time. The dust hopper was connected with
131
cyclone by a flange, so we can disassemble the hopper and take out the captured fine particles after
132
the experiment, the particle mass that were captured into dust hopper mu can be obtained by an
133
accurate electronic balance. All of our experiments were repeated three times.
134
ACS Paragon Plus Environment 9
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 10 of 24
135
Figure 3. Schematic diagram of the experimental setup. 1-air filter; 2-air blower; 3-bypass valve;
136
4-buffer tank; 5-discharge valve; 6-material tank; 7-main valve; 8-flow meter; 9-pressure meter;
137
10-U-tube manometer; 11-reducer pipe; 12-particle sorting classifier; and 13-cyclone.
138 139
The overall separation efficiency (E) was calculated by Eq. (1).
E=
mu × 100% mi
(1)
140
To obtain the characteristics of particle size distribution at the inlet and outlet (dust hopper),
141
particles were first qualitatively observed by a field-emission scanning electron microscope (NOVA
142
NanoSEM450, FEI Inc., U.S.A), and then quantitatively measured using a Mastersizer 2000 laser
143
particle size analyzer (Malvern instruments Ltd., England).
144
Grade efficiency (G) refers to the separation efficiency of dispersed particles of different size
145
grades in a suspension or the recovery rate of particles of all size grades.40,41 The specific grades are
146
represented by dj (j = 1, 2, ...,n), and their grade efficiency can be obtained by Eq. (2).
147
G(d j ) =
148
where G(dj) refers to the separation efficiency of the particles with size dj; fu(dj) and fi(dj) refer to the
149
mass percentage of particles with size dj at the dust hopper and at the inlet, respectively.
mu f u ( d j ) mi f i (d j )
×100%
(2)
150
Materials. In the experiment, the continuous phase was the filtered air. The dispersed phase was
151
the spherical silicon dioxide particles, which were used to simulate the aerosol particles in the
152
atmospheric environment and industrial exhaust gases because both of them have the same
153
characteristic of being composed of different sized particles. Figure 4 shows the size distribution of
154
the spherical silicon dioxide particles. The volume mean diameter of the particles was 15.7 µm, the
155
proportion of PM2.5 was 16.6%, and the proportion of PM10 was 41.4%, as shown in Figure 4(a). The ACS Paragon Plus Environment 10
Page 11 of 24
Environmental Science & Technology
156
number-size distribution of inlet particles is shown in Figure 4(b). The scanning electron microscope
157
(SEM) photograph, shown in Figures 4(c) and 4(d), indicated that the particles of silicon dioxide
158
have a good degree of sphericity.
159 160
Figure 4. Inlet silicon dioxide particle size distribution: (a) Volume distribution. (b) Number
161
distribution. (c) Low magnification SEM photograph. (d) High magnification SEM photograph.
162
Results and discussion
163
Mean particle size distribution at the outlet of PSC. In our previous studies, we divided the
164
rectangular outlet of PSC into 12 individual outlets with equal areas.39 The position of each outlet is
165
denoted by ij (the outlet’s axial position is denoted by i, from the inlet side to the outlet side, i = 1, 2,
166
3, 4; the outlet’s radial position is denoted by j, from the inside to the outside, j = 1, 2, 3). Figure S4
167
shows the particle mass (mij) and mean particle size (dij) at 12 individual outlets when H = 5a1. The ACS Paragon Plus Environment 11
Environmental Science & Technology
168
results show that both particle mass and mean particle size increase progressively from radial inside
169
to outside (i.e., from j = 1 to j = 3) and from axial inlet side to outlet side (i.e., from i = 1 to i = 4).
170
This means that the smaller particles were close to the axial inlet side and the radially inner side,
171
whereas the bigger particles were close to the axial outlet side and the radially outer side; particles
172
were arranged in an ordered sorting at the outlet of PSC, as shown in Figure 1(a).
173
Influence of gravity field on particle sorting. As shown in Figure 1(h) and Figure 1(i), the PSC
174
assembled in VPR-C and VRR-C need to be positioned horizontally. To study the influence of the
175
horizontal positioning of PSC on particle sorting, we studied the particle mass and mean particle size
176
at the 12 individual outlets when the angle (θ) between the axis of PSC and the vertical are 0°, 45°,
177
90°, 135° and 180°. We also calculated the radial sorting effect σ i and the axial sorting effect σ j ,
178
which were defined in our previous studies.39 The results show that no matter the value of θ was, the
179
regular of particle distribution at the rectangular outlet of PSC always presents in a consistent way.
180
Moreover, the changes in σ i and σ j that were produced by changes in θ can be neglected
181
(Figure S5). These results demonstrate that the gravity field has little effect on the particle sorting of
182
the PSC. In other words, the PSC can be connected with a cyclone in any type without influencing
183
the regular and efficiency of particle sorting at the outlet of the PSC.
184
The pressure drop of PSC and cyclones. The pressure drop of cyclone mainly refers to the fluid
185
pressure difference between the inlet and outlet, indicating the energy consumption that occurs while
186
fluid is flowing through the cyclone. Pressure drop is a key technical parameter and operational
187
indicator. Figure S6(a) shows the pressure drop (∆p1) of the individual PSC and Figure S6(b) shows
188
the pressure drop (∆p2) of CM-C and four inlet particle-sorting cyclones under different inlet flow
189
rates (Q). The results show that particle sorting led to a slight increase in cyclone pressure drop, and
190
the VRR-C has the largest pressure drop among all the cyclones. However, because the pressure
191
drop of the individual PSC was extremely small, the pressure drop increase due to particle sorting ACS Paragon Plus Environment 12
Page 12 of 24
Page 13 of 24
Environmental Science & Technology
192
was not apparent. When the inlet flow rate was 40 m3/h, the pressure drop of the individual PSC was
193
42 Pa, and the pressure drop of VRR-C was only 135 Pa higher than that of CM-C; hence, adding
194
the PSC to compose an inlet particle-sorting cyclone does not lead to excessive additional energy
195
consumption, the newly designed inlet particle-sorting cyclone has excellent economic performance.
196
The dimensionless parameters Reynolds number (Re) and Euler number (Eu), which correspond
197
to the inlet flow rate and pressure drop, respectively, are two important indices for the similar
198
amplification criterion in engineering design and application of cyclone. The relationship of Re and
199
Eu is an effective predictor of the cyclone energy consumption and processing capacity. Eu
200
represents the value of the pressure drop coefficient. Therefore, particle sorting also led to a slight
201
increase in Eu (Figure S7). In engineering scale-up design, the region where the value of Eu is lower
202
should be selected.
203
The overall separation efficiency of cyclones. Figure 5(a) shows the overall separation
204
efficiency (E) of five types of cyclones under different inlet flow rates. The separation efficiency of
205
each increased with the inlet flow rate at first, then began to decrease after the inlet flow rate reached
206
40 m3/h. This occurred because when the flow rate was too small, the centrifugal force inside the
207
cyclone that drives particles to move toward the sidewall was not large enough, resulting in low
208
separation efficiency; when the inlet flow rate was excessively large, axial velocity became
209
extremely large such that the residence time of the particles in the cyclone was shortened, and the
210
excessively large flow also enlarged the short-circuit flow and turbulence intensity of the cyclone,
211
which destroyed the relatively ordered state of the forced vortex and free vortex of the inside flow
212
field; hence, the separation efficiency was decreased. Among the five types of cyclones, VRR-C has
213
the highest separation efficiency under the same conditions. The highest overall separation efficiency
214
(Emax) of VRR-C was up to 98.3%, which was 6.4% higher than that of CM-C. Figure 5(b) shows the ACS Paragon Plus Environment 13
Environmental Science & Technology
215
particle concentration at the outlet (Cout) of five types of cyclones when the inlet particle
216
concentration was 2000 mg/m3; the lowest outlet particle concentration (Cmin) of CM-C was 160.6
217
mg/m3, which was 5 times higher than the emission limits stipulated in the Chinese emission
218
standard of air pollutants for the petroleum refining industry (GB 31570-2015, China) and thermal
219
power plants (GB 13223-2011, China).42,43 In contrast, the lowest outlet particle concentration of
220
VRR-C (Cmin) was just 34.1 mg/m3. Although the inlet particle concentration was as high as 2000
221
mg/m3, the outlet gas of VRR-C nearly achieved the standard for direct emission. Therefore, VRR-C
222
can be efficiently applied to the situations that require precise separation to increase the degree of air
223
cleaning.
224 225
Figure 5. The particle separating capacity of cyclones under different inlet flow rates: (a) Overall
226
separation efficiency. (b) Particle concentration of the outlet gas.
227
Figure 5 shows that the overall separation efficiency of VRR-C was the best; PRR-C and VPR-C
228
also had the ability to improve the separating capacity of the common cyclone. As we all know,
229
particles in the gas are not always of the same size but rather are a group of particles with different
230
sizes; these particles with relatively small sizes are difficult to separate because their centrifugal
231
forces are not large enough, which is the major factor that obstructs the improvement of cyclone ACS Paragon Plus Environment 14
Page 14 of 24
Page 15 of 24
Environmental Science & Technology
232
separation and particulate matter pollution control. As shown in Figure 1(i), VRR-C controlled the
233
smaller particles that entered cyclone from the radially outer side and the axially lower side of the
234
inlet, which are the best inlet positions that facilitate particle separation.32 Therefore, the separation
235
efficiency of the smaller particles was directly improved; although these relatively large particles
236
were adjusted at inlet positions that are not good for separation, their centrifugal forces are large
237
enough that they can easily move toward the sidewall and then be captured. Additionally, as shown
238
in Figure 6, the initial position of relatively large particles in VRR-C were the radially inner side and
239
axially upper side; in the process of these particles were driven to the radially outer side (sidewall)
240
and the axially lower side (dust hopper) by field forces, these large particles can form a radially
241
mobile membrane and an axially mobile membrane in VRR-C (Figure 6). The mobile membrane can
242
further push the relatively small particles to move toward the sidewall and dust hopper where they
243
can be easily separated, although the centrifugal forces of these small particles are not enough to
244
support the separation process. Thus, the advantageous inlet positions for the smaller particles and
245
the mobile membrane formed by the larger particles co-operate to improve the separation efficiency
246
of the smaller particles (PM2.5) while exerting no reduction in the separation efficiency of the
247
relatively large particles; therefore, the overall separation efficiency of VRR-C was significantly
248
improved.
249
Similarly, as shown in Figure 1 and Figure 6, the initial positions of the relatively large particles in
250
PRR-C were the radially inner side and the axially lower side, i.e., it only formed a radially mobile
251
membrane in the process of separation; the initial positions of the relatively large particles in VPR-C
252
were the radially outer side and axially upper side, i.e., it only formed an axially mobile membrane.
253
As a result, the mobile membrane also improved the separation efficiency of the small particles, and
254
although PRR-C and VPR-C do not leave the smaller particles at the best inlet positions, the overall ACS Paragon Plus Environment 15
Environmental Science & Technology
255
separation of PRR-C and VPR-C was higher than that of CM-C but also lower than that of VRR-C
256
(Figure 5). PPR-C cannot form any mobile membrane, and the smaller particles were at the most
257
disadvantageous inlet positions (radially inner side and the axially upper side) for particle
258
separation.32 Thus, the separation efficiency of small particles was reduced, resulting in the overall
259
separation efficiency of PPR-C that was slightly lower than that of CM-C.
260 261
Figure 6. Schematic diagram of radially and/or axially mobile membranes of the inlet
262
particle-sorting cyclones
263
The grading efficiency of cyclones. The overall separation efficiency (E) represents the overall
264
separation capacity for particle groups but cannot indicate the separation capacity for each size grade,
265
which is the function of particle grading efficiency (G). Therefore, G also can effectively predict the
266
separation performance of a given cyclone. Figure 7(a) shows the grading efficiency curves of five
267
types of cyclones when the inlet flow rate was 40 m3/h. The grading efficiency of the smaller
ACS Paragon Plus Environment 16
Page 16 of 24
Page 17 of 24
Environmental Science & Technology
268
particles (particularly PM2.5) shows the same regular as the overall separation efficiency. VRR-C had
269
the highest PM2.5 grading efficiency at over 80%, which was 15%~20% higher than that of CM-C.
270
As with the overall separation efficiency, the PM2.5 grading efficiencies of PRR-C and VPR-C were
271
higher than that of CM-C, while that of PPR-C was lower. The grading efficiency curves further
272
demonstrate that VRR-C improved the separation efficiency for PM2.5 while exerting no reduction in
273
the separation of larger particles. Figure 7(b) shows that when the total inlet particle concentration
274
was 2000 mg/m3, the PM2.5 concentration at VRR-C outlet was 30.8 mg/m3, which was 87.6 mg/m3
275
lower than that of CM-C (118.4 mg/m3). The lower PM2.5 outlet concentration directly indicates that
276
VRR-C possesses high value in controlling PM2.5 concentration in the atmospheric environment.
277 278
Figure 7. (a) Grading efficiency curves of cyclones. (b) Particle size grade distribution at the outlet
279
of cyclones.
280
Results presented herein demonstrate that these novel inlet particle-sorting cyclones (especially
281
the VRR-C) effectively enhanced the PM2.5 separation, and then improved the overall separation
282
efficiency of the cyclone. The pressure drop and separation efficiency results also show that the
283
VRR-C has excellent technic-economic performance, shown in Table 1. VRR-C not only provides a
ACS Paragon Plus Environment 17
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 18 of 24
284
useful template for the higher efficiency cyclone design but also an effective enhancement for the
285
separation and capture of PM2.5, which is the separation difficulty in the environmental protection
286
field. The successful application of VRR-C in the industry could effectively reduce the PM2.5
287
concentration for the source control in the atmospheric environment and play an important role in
288
stopping the phenomenon of increasing levels of PM2.5 in the air threatening the quality of our lives,
289
thus improving the quality of our atmosphere.
290
Table 1 The technic-economic performance comparison of cyclones Technical performance Cyclones
Overall separation efficiency (%)
PPR-C
91.3
Outlet particle concentration (mg/m3)
PM2.5 grade efficiency (%)
173.6
Economic performance Outlet PM2.5 concentration (mg/m3)
~58
127.1
Pressure drop (40m3/h, Pa) 270
PRR-C
95.3
93.2
~75
72.9
288
VPR-C
94.1
117.3
~67
91.2
312
VRR-C
98.3
34.1
~81
30.8
343
CM-C
91.9
160.6
~63
118.4
235
291 292
Supporting Information
293
The geometry models of PR-PSC and RR-PSC (S1); the detailed geometry parameters of PSCs
294
(S2); the names and specifications of the main laboratory equipment and instruments (S3); the mass
295
and size distribution of different sized particles at the outlet of PSC (S4); the influence of the
296
positioning angle of PSC on particle sorting (S5); the pressure drop of individual PSC and cyclones
297
under different inlet flow rates (S6); the relationship of Re and Eu at the inlet of cyclones (S7).
298
Acknowledgments
299 300
This research was supported by the sponsorship of the National Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of China (Grant No.51125032).
ACS Paragon Plus Environment 18
Page 19 of 24
Environmental Science & Technology
301
References
302
(1) Brauer, M.; Freedman, G.; Frostad, J.; Donkelaar, A.V.; Martin, R.V.;
Dentener, F.; Dingenen,
303
R.V.; Estep, K.; Amini, H.; Apte, J.S.; Balakrishnan, K.; Barregard, L.; Broday, D.; V. Feigin,
304
Ghosh, S.; Hopke, P.K.; Knibbs, L.D.; Kokubo, Y.; Liu, Y.; Ma, S.; Morawska, L.; Sangrador,
305
J.L.T.; Shaddick, G.; Anderson, H.R.; Vos, T. Forouzanfar, M.H.; Burnett, R.T.; Cohen, A.
306
Ambient air pollution exposure estimation for the global burden of disease 2013. Environ. Sci.
307
Technol. 2016, 50, 79-88. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b03709.
308 309
(2) Pope, C.A. III; Dockery, D.W. Health effects of fine particulate air pollution: lines that connect. J. Air. Waste. Manage. 2006, 56, 709-742. DOI: 10.1080/10473289.2006.10464485.
310
(3) Madaniyazi, L.; Nagashima, T.; Guo, Y.; Yu, W.; Tong, S. Projecting fine particulate
311
matter-related mortality in East China. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 11141-11150. DOI:
312
10.1021/acs.est.5b01478.
313 314
(4) Apte, J.S.; Marshall, J.D.; Cohen, A.J.; Brauer, M. Addressing global mortality from ambient PM2.5. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 8057-8066. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b01236.
315
(5) Liang, C.S.; Duan, F.K.; He, K.B.; Ma, Y.L. Review on recent progress in observations, source
316
identifications and countermeasures of PM2.5. Enviro. Int. 2016, 86, 150-170. DOI: 10.1016/
317
j.envint.2015.10.016.
318
(6) Boman, J.; Shaltout, A.A.; Abozied, A.M.; Hassand, S.K. On the elemental composition of
319
PM2.5 in central Cairo, Egypt. X-Ray Spectrom. 2013, 42, 276-283. DOI: 10.1002/xrs.2464.
320
(7) Philip, S.; Martin, R.V.; Van, D.A.; Lo, J.W.; Wang, Y.; Chen, D.; Zhang, L.; Kasibhatla, P. S.;
321
Wang, S.; Zhang, Q.; Lu, Z.; Streets, D.G.; Bittman, S.; Macdonald, D.J. Global chemical
ACS Paragon Plus Environment 19
Environmental Science & Technology
322
composition of ambient fine particulate matter for exposure assessment. Environ. Sci. Technol.
323
2014, 48, 13060-13068. DOI: dx.doi.org/10.1021/es502965b.
324
(8) Forouzanfar, M. H.; Alexander, L.; Anderson, H. R.; Bachman, V. F.; Biryukov, S.; Brauer, M.;
325
Burnett, R.; Casey, D.; Coates, M. M.; Cohen, A.; et al. Global, regional, and national
326
comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic
327
risks or clusters of risks in 188 countries, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global
328
Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2015, 386, 2287-2323. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736
329
(15)00128-2.
330
(9) Liu, Z.; Hu, B.; Zhang, J.; Yu, Y.; Wang, Y. Characteristics of aerosol size distributions and
331
chemical compositions during wintertime pollution episodes in Beijing. Atmos. Res. 2016, 168,
332
1-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.08.013.
333
(10) Chen, Y.; Tian, G.; Zhou, M.; Huang, Z.; Lu, C.; Hu, P.; Gao, J.; Zhang, Z.; Tang, X. Catalytic
334
Control of Typical Particulate Matters and Volatile Organic Compounds Emissions from
335
Simulated Biomass Burning. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 50, 5825-5831. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.
336
5b06109.
337
(11) Linse, P.; Lobaskin, V. Electrostatic attraction and phase separation in solutions of like-charged
338
colloidal particles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1999, 83, 4208-4211. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.4208
339
(12) Dietrich, W.E. Settling velocity of natural particles. Water. Resour. Res. 1982, 18, 1615-1626.
340
DOI: 10.1029/WR018i006p01615.
341
(13) Ji, J.H.; Bae, G.N.; Kang, S.H.; Hwang, J. Effect of particle loading on the collection
342
performance of an electret cabin air filter for submicron aerosols. J. Aerosol. Sci. 2003, 34,
ACS Paragon Plus Environment 20
Page 20 of 24
Page 21 of 24
343
344 345
Environmental Science & Technology
1493-1504. DOI: 10.1016/S0021-8502(03)00103-4.
(14) Potanin, E.P. Three-dimensional gas flow in a rotating cylinder with a retarding cover. Fluid. Dynam+. 2013, 48, 68-76. DOI: 10.1134/S0015462813010080.
346
(15) Wang, H.L.; Zhang, Y.H.; Wang, J.G.; Liu, H.L. Cyclonic separation technology: Researches
347
and developments. Chinese. J. Chem. Eng. 2012, 20, 212-219. DOI: 10.1016/S1004-9541
348
(12)60381-4.
349
(16) Tsai, C.J.; Chen, S.C.; Przekop, R.; Moskal, R. Study of an axial flow cyclone to remove
350
nanoparticles in vacuum. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41, 1689-1695. DOI: 10.1021/es060518o.
351
(17) Li, Q.; Xu, W.W.; Wang, J.J.; Jin, Y.H. Performance evaluation of a new cyclone separator – Part
352
I experimental results. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2015, 141, 53-58. DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.
353
2014.10.030.
354
(18) Hsu, Y.D.; Chein H M, Chen, T.M.; Tsai, C.J. Axial flow cyclone for segregation and collection
355
of ultrafine particles: theoretical and experimental study. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39,
356
1299-1308. DOI: 10.1021/es0491735.
357
(19) Fraser, S.M.; Abdel-Razek, A.M.; Abdullah, M.Z. Computational and experimental
358
investigations in a cyclone dust separator. Proc. Inst. Mechanical Eng. E: J. Proc. Mechanical
359
Engi. 1997, 211, 247-257. DOI: 10.1243/0954408971529719.
360 361
(20) Klujszo, L.A.C.; Rafaelof, M.; Rajamani, R.K. Dust collection performance of a swirl air cleaner. Powder. Technol. 1999, 103, 130-138. DOI: 10.1016/S0032-5910(98)00228-9.
362
(21) Shin, M.S.; Kim, H.S.; Jang, D.S.; Chung, J.D.; Bohnet, M. A numerical and experimental study
363
on a high efficiency cyclone dust separator for high temperature and pressurized environments. ACS Paragon Plus Environment 21
Environmental Science & Technology
364
Appl. Therm. Eng. 2005, 25, 1821-1835. DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2004.11.002.
365
(22) Ma, L.; Shen, Q.S.; Li, J.P.; Zhang, Y.H.; Efficient Gas-Liquid cyclone device for recycled
366
hydrogen in a hydrogenation unit. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2014, 37, 1072-1078. DOI: 10.1002/
367
ceat.201300320.
368 369
370 371
(23) Jiao, J.Y.; Zheng, Y.; Sun, G.G.; Wang, J. Study of the separation efficiency and the flow field of a dynamic cyclone. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2006, 49, 157-166. DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2005.09.011.
(24) Cena, L.G.; Anthony, T.R.; Peters, T. M. A personal nanoparticle respiratory deposition (NRD) sampler. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 6483-6490. DOI: 10.1021/es201379a.
372
(25) Tsai, C.J.; Liu, C.N.; Hung, S.M.; Chen, S.C.; Uang, S.N.; Cheng, Y.S.; Zhou, Y. Novel active
373
personal nanoparticle sampler for the exposure assessment of nanoparticles in workplaces.
374
Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 4546-4552. DOI: 10.1021/es204580f.
375 376
(26) Avci, A.; Karagoz, I. Effects of flow and geometrical parameters on the collection efficiency in cyclone separators. J. Aerosol. Sci. 2003, 34, 937-955. DOI: 10.1016/S0021-8502(03)00054-5.
377
(27) Hsiao, T.C.; Huang, S.H.; Hsu, C.W.; Chen, C.C.; Chang, P.K. Effects of the geometric
378
configuration on cyclone performance. J. Aerosol. Sci. 2015, 86, 1-12. DOI: 10.1016/
379
j.jaerosci.2015.03.005.
380 381
(28) Moore, M.E.; Mcfarland, A.R. Design Methodology for Multiple Inlet Cyclones. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1995, 30, 271-276. DOI: 10.1021/es950302e.
382
(29) Zhao, B. Experimental investigation of flow patterns in cyclones with conventional and
383
symmetrical inlet geometries. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2005, 28, 969-972. DOI: 10.1002/ceat.
384
200500088. ACS Paragon Plus Environment 22
Page 22 of 24
Page 23 of 24
385 386
Environmental Science & Technology
(30) Elsayed, K. Design of a novel gas cyclone vortex finder using the adjoint method. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2015, 142, 274-286. DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2015.01.010.
387
(31) Qian, F.P.; Zhang, J.G.; Zhang, M.Y. Effects of the prolonged vertical tube on the separation
388
performance of a cyclone. J. Hazard. Mater. 2006, 136, 822-829. DOI: 10.1016/
389
j.jhazmat.2006.01.028.
390
(32) Elsayed, K.; Lacor, C. The effect of the dust outlet geometry on the performance and
391
hydrodynamics of gas cyclones. Comput. Fluids. 2012, 68, 134-147. DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.
392
2012.07.029.
393
(33) Gimbun, J.; Chuah, T.G.; Fakhru’l-Razi, A.; Choong, T.S.Y. The influence of temperature and
394
inlet velocity on cyclone pressure drop: a CFD study. Chem. Eng. Process. 2005, 44, 7-12. DOI:
395
10.1016/j.cep.2004.03.005.
396
(34) Yoshida, H.; Fukui, K.; Pratarn, W.; Tanthapanichakoon, W. Particle separation performance by
397
use of electrical hydro-cyclone. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2006, 50, 330-335. DOI: 10.1016/
398
j.seppur.2005.12.015.
399
(35) Pratarn, W.; Wiwut, T.; Yoshida, H.; Kuniniro, F. Effect of pH of fine silica suspension and
400
central rod diameter on the cut size of an electrical hydrocyclone with and without underflow.
401
Sep. Purif. Technol. 2008, 63, 452-459. DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2008.06.006.
402
(36) Wang, Z.B.; Chu, L.Y.; Chen, W.M.; Wang, S.G. Experimental investigation of the motion
403
trajectory of solid particles inside the hydrocyclone by a Lagrange method. Chem. Eng. J. 2008,
404
138, 1-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2007.05.037.
405
(37) Liu, P.K.; Chu, L.Y.; Wang, J.; Yu, Y.F. Enhancement of hydrocyclone classification efficiency ACS Paragon Plus Environment 23
Environmental Science & Technology
406
for fine particles by introducing a volute chamber with a pre-sedimentation function. Chem. Eng.
407
Technol. 2008, 31, 474-478. DOI: 10.1002/ceat.200700449.
408
(38) Yang, Q.; Lv, W.J.; Ma, L.; Wang, H.L. CFD study on separation enhancement of
409
mini-hydrocyclone by particulate arrangement. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2013, 102, 15-25. DOI:
410
10.1016/j.seppur.2012.09.018.
411
(39) Fu, P.B.; Wang, F.; Ma, L.; Yang, X.J.; Wang. H.L. Fine Particle Sorting and Classification in the
412
Cyclonic Centrifugal Field. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2016, 158, 357-366. DOI: 10.1016/
413
j.seppur.2015.12.044.
414
(40) Yang, Q.; Li, Z.M.; Lv, W.J.; Wang, H.L. On the laboratory and field studies of removing fine
415
particles suspended in wastewater using mini-hydrocyclone. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2013, 110,
416
93-100. DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2013.03.025.
417
(41) Ray, M.B.; Hoffmann, A.C.; Postma, R.S. Performance of different analytical methods in
418
evaluating grade efficiency of centrifugal separators. J. Aerosol. Sci. 2000, 31, 563-581. DOI:
419
10.1016/S0021-8502(99)00543-1.
420
(42) GB 13223-2011. Emission standard of air pollutants for thermal power plants. China. 2011.
421
(43) GB 31570-2015. Emission standard of pollutants for petroleum refining industry. China. 2015.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment 24
Page 24 of 24