Isolation, Structural Elucidation, and Synthesis of ... - ACS Publications

Subscriber access provided by UCL Library Services

Article

Isolation, Structural Elucidation and Synthesis of Lepteridine from M#nuka Honey Benjamin J Daniels, Gordana Prijic, Sarah Meidinger, Kerry M. Loomes, Jonathan M. Stephens, Ralf C. Schlothauer, Daniel P. Furkert, and Margaret A. Brimble J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b01596 • Publication Date (Web): 22 May 2016 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on May 31, 2016

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 25

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Isolation, Structural Elucidation and Synthesis of Lepteridine From Mānuka (Leptospermum scoparium) Honey Benjamin J. Daniels,† Gordana Prijic, ‡§ Sarah Meidinger,§ Kerry M. Loomes,§ # Jonathan M. Stephens,‡§ Ralf C. Schlothauer,‡ Daniel P. Furkert,† #* Margaret A. Brimble.† #* †

School of Chemical Sciences, The University of Auckland, 23 Symonds Street, Auckland, New

Zealand. ‡

Comvita NZ Limited, 23 Wilson South Road, Te Puke, New Zealand.

§

School of Biological Sciences and Institute for Innovation in Biotechnology, The University of

Auckland, 3A Symonds Street, Auckland, New Zealand. #

Maurice Wilkins Centre for Molecular Biodiscovery, The University of Auckland, 3 Symonds Street,

Auckland, New Zealand. *Corresponding author (Tel: +64-9-9238389; Fax: +64-9-3737422; E-mail: [email protected])

1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment


Page 2 of 25

1

ABSTRACT: Mānuka honey, made from the nectar of Leptospermum scoparium, has

2

garnered scientific and economical interest due to its non-peroxide antibacterial activity.

3

Biomarkers for genuine mānuka honey are increasingly in demand due to the presence of

4

counterfeit mānuka honey. This work reports the identification of a compound previously

5

unreported in mānuka honey by HPLC, and determination of the structure of the as

6

3,6,7-trimethyllumazine using NMR, MS, IR and UV/Vis spectroscopy. This assignment was

7

confirmed by total synthesis. The natural product, renamed lepteridine, was only observed in

8

mānuka honeys and could potentially serve as a biomarker for genuine mānuka honey.

9

KEYWORDS Leptospermum, mānuka honey, biomarker, lepteridine, lumazine.


Page 3 of 25


10

Introduction

11

Honey was first used to augment the healing of wounds by the ancient Egyptians1 and is

12

currently a clinical wound treatment.2-3 New Zealand mānuka honey, derived from the nectar

13

of Leptospermum scoparium, exhibits non-peroxide based antibacterial activity due to the

14

presence of methyl glyoxal (MGO).4 Mānuka honey is active against methicillin-resistant

15

Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)5-6 and increases the susceptibility of MRSA to rifampicin7

16

and oxacillin.8

17

Currently, genuine mānuka honey is labelled by either reporting the MGO concentration9 or

18

using the Unique Mānuka Factor (UMF) scale, which equates the bactericidal activity of a

19

given honey sample with that of a given concentration of phenol.10 This bactericidal activity

20

is dependent on the concentration of MGO. Since MGO is produced in honey from

21

dihydroxyacetone during incubation11 the concentration of MGO and the UMF of a given

22

honey sample can change over time. Furthermore, adulteration of honey via addition of

23

dihydroxyacetone or MGO gives rise to comparable bactericidal activity,12 meaning that the

24

current labelling system does not provide consumers or suppliers with the information

25

required to recognize counterfeit mānuka honeys, which pose a threat to the mānuka honey

26

market.13 Due to its medical and economic relevance, compounds that could serve as unique

27

markers for genuine mānuka honey are of scientific and commercial importance.

28

The phytochemical profile of mānuka honey has been probed with the aim of elucidating

29

the mechanism(s) of the bioactivity of the honey and discovering unique biomarkers.14 One

30

compound, leptosperin, 1, has been proposed as a both a contributor towards the bactericidal

31

activity of mānuka honey and as a unique mānuka marker (Figure 1).15-16 Additionally, 2-

32

acetyl-1-pyrroline (2) has been found to be produced from native proline in the presence of

33

high (>250 mg/kg) concentrations of MGO, and has also been proposed as a potential

34

marker.17 Additional markers would provide greater security for honey consumers and further 3 ACS Paragon Plus Environment


Page 4 of 25

35

choice for regulators. Herein we report the isolation, structural elucidation, and synthesis of

36

lepteridine, 3, a pteridine derivative with the systematic name 3,6,7-trimethyllumazine,18-27

37

from mānuka honey. We observed lepteridine, 3, exclusively in Leptospermum honeys; hence

38

3 could serve as a unique marker for mānuka honey.

39

Materials and Methods

40

Botanical samples. Nectar samples were obtained by direct sampling from specimens

41

grown in glasshouses using a micropipette and stored at -20 °C until analysis. Mānuka honey

42

samples were collected from hives in the field. Botanical origin was established by floral-

43

source field site analysis during collection, the presence of diagnostic compounds such as

44

DHA and MGO, and phenolic composition. Additional honey samples were obtained from

45

commercial suppliers in New Zealand. Samples were stored at 4 °C until analysis. Honeydew

46

was collected from wild Fuscospora solandri specimens and stored at -20 °C until analysis.

47

Reagents and Solvents. The following chemicals were purchased as analytical reagent grade

48

and used without further purification: 6-aminouracil and 5,6-diamino-1-methyluracil (AK

49

Scientific, Union City, CA); CDCl3 and (CD3)2SO (Cambridge Isotope Laboratories,

50

Tewksbury, MA); AcOH, K2CO3, NaHCO3, NH4OH and NaOH (ECP NZ Ltd, Auckland,

51

New Zealand); HCOOH (May and Baker Ltd, London, England); MeCN, MeI (Merck,

52

Auckland, New Zealand); 2,3-butanedione, hexamethyldisilazane, KMnO4, NaNO2 and

53

Na2S2O4 (Sigma Aldrich NZ Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand). The following chemicals were

54

purchased and distilled by rotary evaporation prior to use: EtOAc, MeOH and petroleum

55

ether (ECP NZ Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand). DMF (ECP NZ Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand)

56

was degassed and dried using an LC Technical SP-1 solvent purification system (Scitek

57

Australia, Sydney, Australia). Bidistilled water was generated by a Barnstead NANOpure

58

Diamond Water Purification System (Thermofisher Scientific, Auckland, New Zealand).

59

EtOH (ECP NZ Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand) was distilled over Mg(OEt)2 (Sigma Aldrich 4 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 5 of 25


60

NZ

Ltd,

Auckland,

New

Zealand).

61

Instrumentation. Solid phase extraction (SPE) was performed using Strata C18 E 70 Å, 55

62

µm 20 g columns (Phenomenex, Auckland, New Zealand). RP-HPLC was performed using

63

an Agilent 1100 system (Global Science, Auckland, New Zealand). The column used was a

64

250 mm × 2.0 mm i.d., 5 µm, Jupiter 300 C18, with a 4 mm x 4 mm i.d. guard column of the

65

same material (Phenomenex, Auckland, New Zealand) at a flow rate of 0.2 mL/min with a

66

DAD Detector operating at 262, 280 and 320 nm (Global Science, Auckland, New Zealand).

67

Samples were analyzed in duplicate. Thin layer chromatography (TLC) was performed using

68

0.2 mm Kieselgel F254 (Merck, Auckland, New Zealand) silica plates and compounds were

69

visualized using UV irradiation at 254 or 365 nm and/or staining with a solution of potassium

70

permanganate and potassium carbonate in aqueous sodium hydroxide. Flash chromatography

71

was carried out using 0.063-0.1 mm Davisil silica gel (Trajan, Melbourne, Australia) with the

72

desired solvent. Preparative TLC was performed using 500 µm, 20 × 20 cm Uniplate (John

73

Morris Scientific, Auckland, New Zealand) silica gel TLC plates and compounds were

74

visualized using UV irradiation at 254 or 365 nm. High resolution mass spectra were

75

recorded on a Bruker micrOTOF-Q II mass spectrometer with ESI ionization source.

76

Ultraviolet-visible spectra were run as H2O solutions on a Shimadzu UV-2101PC scanning

77

spectrophotometer. Infrared spectra were obtained using a Perkin-Elmer Spectrum 100 FTIR

78

spectrometer on a film ATR sampling accessory. Absorption maxima are expressed in

79

wavenumbers (cm-1). Melting points were determined on a Stuart Scientific SMP-3 capillary

80

apparatus (Global Science NZ Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand). NMR spectra were recorded as

81

indicated on either a Bruker Avance 400 spectrometer operating at 400 MHz for 1H nuclei

82

and 100 MHz for 13C nuclei, a Bruker Avance AVIII-HD 500 spectrometer operating at 500

83

MHz for 1H nuclei, 125 MHz for 13C nuclei or a Bruker Avance 600 spectrometer operating

84

at 600 MHz for 1H nuclei, 150 MHz for 13C nuclei. 1H and 13C chemical shifts are reported in



Page 6 of 25

85

parts per million (ppm) relative to CDCl3 (1H and

86

chemical shifts were referenced using the unified Ξi scale28 as implemented by the Bruker

87

library function “xiref.” 1H NMR data is reported as chemical shift, relative integral,

88

multiplicity (s, singlet; assignment). Assignments were made with the aid of COSY, NOESY,

89

HSQC

90

Analysis of samples by HPLC. Honey (~1 g) was dissolved in H2O containing 0.1%

91

HCOOH (3 mL), sonicated for 20 min and centrifuged to remove insoluble particles. An

92

aliquot (1 mL) of each honey sample was applied to a preconditioned (MeOH) and

93

equilibrated (H2O containing 0.1% HCOOH) SPE column using H2O containing 0.1%

94

HCOOH and washed with MeOH/H2O (3 mL, 1:9, v/v) containing 0.1% HCOOH. The

95

desired fraction was then eluted using MeOH/H2O (3 mL, 4:1, v/v) containing 0.1%

96

HCOOH. A 5 µL aliquot of sample was injected and separated by gradient elution using the

97

following gradient: 5%-25% B over 10 min; 25%-50% B over 10 min; 50%-100% B over 5

98

min, where solvent A was H2O containing 0.1% HCOOH and B was A/MeCN (1:4, v/v).

99

Peaks of interest were collected manually. Nectar samples were diluted 5-fold before a 5 µL

100

aliquot of sample was analyzed by HPLC as described above. Concentrations were calculated

101

using

102

Isolation of 3,6,7-trimethyllumazine, 3, from mānuka honey in preparative quantities.

103

Raw mānuka honey (51.3 g) was dissolved in H2O containing 0.1% HCOOH (80 mL),

104

sonicated for 20 min and filtered. The sample was applied to a preconditioned (MeOH) and

105

equilibrated (H2O containing 0.1% HCOOH) SPE column using H2O containing 0.1%

106

HCOOH and washed with MeOH/H2O (80 mL, 1:9, v/v) containing 0.1% HCOOH. The

107

desired fraction was then eluted using MeOH/H2O (80 mL, 4:1, v/v) containing 0.1%

108

HCOOH and concentrated in vacuo to give the crude extract (0.23 g) which was further

109

purified by flash chromatography (petroleum ether-EtOAc 1:5, v/v) to give purified extract (3

and

a

standard

HMBC

curve

13

C) or (CD3)2SO (1H and

experiments

derived

where

from

synthetic

13

C).

15

N

required.

sample.


Page 7 of 25


110

mg) as a brown solid. Several purified extracts were combined (6 mg total) and further

111

purified by preparative TLC (petroleum ether-EtOAc 1:4, v/v, 4 runs) to give 3 (4 mg) as a

112

colorless solid. MP: 270-271 °C (lit19 271-272 °C); IR νmax (film) cm-1 2921, 1723, 1667,

113

1435, 1393, 1363, 1281, 1119; UV/Vis λmax 211, 231 and 329nm; 1H NMR (400 MHz,

114

CDCl3) δ 2.63 (3H, s, C6-CH3), 2.67 (3H, s, C7-CH3), 3.50 (3H, s, N-CH3), 8.42 (1H, s, NH);

115

13

116

144.8 (C-8a), 149.9 (C-2), 150.6 (C-7), 158.9 (C-6), 161.1 (C-4); m/z (+ve ion HRESI-MS)

117

229.0696

118

Synthesis of 3,6,7-Trimethyllumazine, 3. 5,6-Diamino-3-methyl uracil (7) (0.48 g, 3.05

119

mmol) was suspended in EtOH (10 mL). 2,3-Butandione (8) (0.29 g, 3.42 mmol) and AcOH

120

(0.94 g, 15.7 mmol) were added. The mixture was heated at reflux for 24 h before being

121

cooled to r.t. and concentrated in vacuo. The crude product was purified by flash

122

chromatography (petroleum ether-EtOAc 1:4, v/v) to give the title compound 3 (0.40 g, 63%)

123

as a colorless solid. MP 268-269 °C (lit19 271-272 °C); IR νmax (film) cm-1 2955, 1728, 1664,

124

1437, 1399, 1368, 1285, 1046; UV λmax 208, 234, and 329 nm; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ

125

2.65 (3H, s, C6-CH3), 2.66 (3H, s, C7-CH3), 3.50 (3H, s, N-CH3), 9.54 (1H, s, NH);

126

NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 21.8 (C7-CH3), 22.6 (C6-CH3), 28.3 (N-CH3), 123.6 (C-4a),

127

144.9 (C-8a), 150.4 (C-2), 150.5 (C-7), 158.8 (C-6), 161.0 (C-4); m/z (+ve ion HRESI-MS)

128

229.0696 [M+Na+], C9H10N4O2Na+ requires 229.0689. 1,6,7-Trimethyllumazine, 4. MP

129

317-325 °C (lit19 340-342 °C); IR νmax (film) cm-1 3040, 1685, 1551, 1495, 1395, 1349, 1283,

130

998; UV λmax, 201, 210, 252, and 334 nm; 1H NMR (400 MHz, (CD3)2SO) δ 2.53 (3H, s,

131

C7-CH3), 2.59 (3H, s, C6-CH3), 3.44 (3H, s, N-CH3); 13C NMR (100 MHz, (CD3)2SO) δ 21.0

132

(C7-CH3), 22.5 (C6-CH3), 27.9 (N-CH3), 124.9 (C-4a), 147.2 (C-7), 147.3 (C-8a), 150.2 (C-

133

2), 156.8 (C-6), 160.2 (C-4); m/z (+ve ion HRESI-MS) 229.0696 [M+Na+], C9H10N4O2Na+

134

requires 229.0701.

C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 21.9 (C7-CH3), 22.8 (C6-CH3), 28.5 (N-CH3), 123.7 (C-4a),

[M+Na+],

C9H10N4O2Na+

requires

229.0689.

13

C



Page 8 of 25

135

Results and Discussion

136

Detection and isolation of lepteridine: While using HPLC to examine New Zealand

137

honeys for the presence of leptosperin, 1, an unexpected UV absorbance 3 was noted at 320

138

nm (Figure 2A). This absorbance was observed in mānuka honeys from a variety of New

139

Zealand locations and in kānuka (Kunzea ericoides) honey, but was absent from other New

140

Zealand honeys including clover (Trifolium repens), rewarewa (Knightia excelsa), and

141

pohutukawa (Metrosideros excelsa) honeys (Table 1). Mānuka and kānuka plants flower

142

concurrently and mixing of mānkua and kānuka honey occurs as a result.29 The nectars of

143

both plants were examined and the absorbance detected only in mānuka nectar. To confirm

144

that the absorbance did not arise from contamination from honeydew produced by scale

145

insects known to feed on mānuka,30 honeydew from black beech (Fuscospora solandri) was

146

also examined and found to lack the distinctive absorbance. Having confirmed that the

147

absorbance was likely due to a native compound in mānuka nectar, we attempted to isolate

148

this compound from mānuka honey. SPE followed by reversed-phase HPLC enabled isolation

149

and partial characterization of the compound that exhibited this UV absorbance. Subjection

150

of mānuka honey to SPE, followed by normal-phase flash chromatography and preparative

151

TLC enabled isolation of the unknown compound as a colorless solid in sufficient quantity to

152

conduct spectroscopic analysis.

153

Structural Elucidation: The compound was soluble in CD3OD and CDCl3; the latter was

154

used for recording NMR spectra due to the presence of a broad resonance at δ 8.55 ppm (H-

155

1) that was absent from spectra recorded in CD3OD (Table 2). This peak was assigned as an

156

amide proton on the basis of its chemical shift and the absence of a distinctive hydroxyl

157

absorption in the IR spectrum. Two singlets at δ 2.63 ppm (H-10) and δ 2.67 ppm (H-11)

158

were assigned as heteroaryl methyl groups on the basis of their chemical shift, and the

159

remaining singlet at δ 3.50 ppm (H-9) was assigned as an N-methyl group due to 1H,

13

C8

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 9 of 25


160

HMBC correlations of equal intensity to two quaternary carbonyl 13C signals (C-2, C-4) and

161

an HSQC correlation to a carbon signal at δ 28.5 ppm (C-9, Figure 3). 1H,

162

correlations from H-10 and H-11 to N-5 and N-8 at δ 292.0 ppm and δ 329.9 ppm

163

respectively, suggested that these two methyl groups were attached to a pyrazine ring. A

164

2,3-dimethyl substitution pattern was assigned based on 1H, 13C-HMBC correlations from H-

165

10 to C-7 and from H-11 to C-6. Given the high degree of unsaturation in the structure and

166

the presence of a pyrazine ring, a pteridine (pyrazine[2,3-d]pyrimidine) structure was

167

proposed for the unknown compound.

15

N-HMBC

168

Initial Assignment: A similarity was noted between the chemical shifts for carbons C-2, C-

169

4 and C-4a with shifts reported for analogous carbons in natural products containing

170

lumazine structures.31 This observation, coupled with HMBC correlations from H-9 to C-2

171

and C-4 and an additional four bond coupling from H-10 to C-4a, led to the tentative

172

assignment of the structure of the isolated compound as either 3,6,7-trimethyllumazine, 3, or

173

1,6,7-trimethyllumazine, 4 (Figure 3).

174

3,6,7-Trimethyllumazine, 3, was first synthesized in 1958. Since then it has been reported

175

in several studies on related lumazines. Characterization data for lumazine 3 is limited to a

176

melting point, elemental analysis and UV/Vis peaks; no NMR, MS or IR data have been

177

reported to date.18-27 Similarly, characterization data for lumazine 4 is limited to a melting

178

point, elemental analysis and UV/Vis.32-41 To date, no reports detailing the isolation of

179

lumazines 3 or 4 from natural materials have been published.

180

The melting point (270-271 °C) of the unknown compound correlated with the reported

181

melting point of lumazine 3 (271-272 °C) rather than that of lumazine 4 (340-342 °C).19 Both

182

compounds were synthesized in order to unambiguously determine the structure of the

183

unknown.



Page 10 of 25

184

Total synthesis: Following the work of Gala et al.,42 N-methylation of 6-aminouracil, 5, at

185

position 3 was accomplished via silylation of the exocyclic amino and carbonyl groups using

186

hexamethyldisilazane in the presence of a catalytic amount of sulfuric acid (Figure 4A).

187

Methylation was then effected using iodomethane. Subsequent desilylation during aqueous

188

workup afforded 6-amino-3-methyluracil, 6, in 78% yield. Amino uracil 6 was then treated

189

with sodium nitrite and acetic acid, followed by reduction with sodium dithionite in aqueous

190

ammonia at 70 °C43 to give 5,6-diamino-3-methyluracil, 7, in 31% yield over two steps. The

191

low yield was attributed to the difficulty in retrieving diamine 7 from the aqueous reaction

192

medium. Condensation of diaminouracil 7 with 2,3-butanedione, 8, in ethanol gave

193

3,6,7-trimethyllumazine, 3, as a colorless solid (63%). Similarly, condensation of

194

commercially

195

1,6,7-trimethyllumazine, 4, as a yellow solid in 60% yield (Figure 4B). Spectroscopic data

196

(UV/Vis, IR, 1H NMR, 13C NMR) of 3,6,7-trimethyllumazine, 3, was in excellent agreement

197

with that of the isolated natural product. Furthermore, the 1H NMR spectrum of combined

198

natural and synthetic products was identical to the 1H NMR spectra of separate natural and

199

synthetic material. The 1H NMR shifts of the methyl protons of lumazine 4 in CD3OD (δ

200

2.62, δ 2.67 and δ 3.61 ppm) did not correlate strongly with those of the unknown compound

201

in CD3OD (δ 2.60, δ 2.61 and δ 3.40 ppm). The melting point of lumazine 4 (324-325 °C)

202

was also distinct from that of the unknown (270-271 °C). Thus the structure of the unknown

203

was definitively established as 3,6,7-trimethyllumazine, 3. Given that lumazine 3 is a

204

pteridine derivative isolated from Leptospermum honey the isolated compound was named

205

lepteridine.

available

5,6-diamino-1-methyl

uracil,

9,

with

844

afforded

206

It is noteworthy that lepteridine was detected at a wavelength (320 nm) longer than those

207

used to find other biomarkers (262 nm,16 283 nm,17 272 nm14). Its absorbance at this


Page 11 of 25


208

wavelength and pteridine structure readily distinguishes lepteridine from other biomarkers.

209

Lepteridine is thus a valuable addition to the chemical “fingerprint” of mānuka honey.

210

In summary, 3,6,7-trimethyllumazine, 3, was isolated from New Zealand mānuka honey,

211

and this structural assignment was confirmed by synthesis. Lumazine 3, named lepteridine,

212

has only been observed in mānuka honey and thus offers potential utility as a unique marker

213

for identification of genuine mānuka honey.

214

Associated Content

215

Supporting Information: Experimental procedures detailing the preparation of and 1H and

216

13

217

Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

218

Author Information

219

*(D.P.F.) Phone +64-9-9238389. E-mail: [email protected].

220

*(M.A.B.) Phone +64-9-9238259. E-mail: [email protected].

221

Funding

222

This work was financially supported by Callaghan Innovation Ltd and Comvita NZ Ltd.

223

Notes

224

Gordana Prijic, Jonathan Stephens and Ralf Schlothauer are employees of Comvita NZ Ltd.

225

References

226

1.

C NMR spectra of compounds 4, 6 and 7. This material is available free of charge via the

York, 1960.

227 228

2.

231

Molan, P. C., Re-introducing honey in the management of wounds and ulcers - theory and practice. Ostomy Wound Manag. 2002, 48, 28-40.

229 230

Guthrie, D., A History of Medicine. Revised ed.; Thomas Nelson and Sons Ltd: New

3.

Jull, A. B.; Cullum, N.; Dumville, J. C.; Westby, M. J.; Deshpande, S.; Walker, N. Honey as a topical treatment for wounds; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd: 2015.



232

4.

Mavric, E.; Wittmann, S.; Barth, G.; Henle, T., Identification and quantification of

233

methylglyoxal as the dominant antibacterial constituent of Manuka (Leptospermum

234

scoparium) honeys from New Zealand. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2008, 52, 483-489.

235

5.

Jenkins, R.; Burton, N.; Cooper, R., Manuka honey inhibits cell division in

236

methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2011, 66,

237

2536-2542.

238

6.

Henriques, A. F.; Jenkins, R. E.; Burton, N. F.; Cooper, R. A., The intracellular

239

effects of manuka honey on Staphylococcus aureus. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect.

240

Dis. 2010, 29, 45-50.

241

7.

Page 12 of 25

Müller, P.; Alber, D. G.; Turnbull, L.; Schlothauer, R. C.; Carter, D. A.; Whitchurch,

242

C. B.; Harry, E. J., Synergism between medihoney and rifampicin against methicillin-

243

resistant Staphylococcus aureus (mrsa). PLoS ONE 2013, 8, 1-9.

244

8.

Jenkins, R. E.; Cooper, R., Synergy between oxacillin and manuka honey sensitizes

245

methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus to oxacillin. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.

246

2012, 67, 1405-1407.

247

9.

properties. Czech J. Food Sci. 2009, 27, S163-S165.

248 249

10.

Allen, K. L.; Molan, P. C.; Reid, G. M., A survey of the antibacterial activity of some New Zealand honeys. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 1991, 43, 817-822.

250 251

Atrott, J.; Henle, T., Methylglyoxal in manuka honey - correlation with antibacterial

11.

Adams, C. J.; Manley-Harris, M.; Molan, P. C., The origin of methylglyoxal in New

252

Zealand manuka (Leptospermum scoparium) honey. Carbohydr. Res. 2009, 344,

253

1050-1053.

254 255

12.

Jervis-Bardy, J.; Foreman, A.; Bray, S.; Tan, L.; Wormald, P.-J., Methylglyoxalinfused honey mimics the anti-Staphylococcus aureus biofilm activity of manuka


Page 13 of 25


256

honey: Potential Implication in Chronic Rhinosinusitis. Laryngoscope 2011, 121,

257

1104-1107.

258

13.

Van Eaton, C., Manuka. Exisle Publishing: Auckland, 2014.

259

14.

Oelschlaegel, S.; Gruner, M.; Wang, P.-N.; Boettcher, A.; Koelling-Speer, I.; Speer,

260

K., Classification and characterization of manuka honeys based on phenolic

261

compounds and methylglyoxal. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 7229-7237.

262

15.

Aitken, H. R. M.; Johannes, M.; Loomes, K. M.; Brimble, M. A., Synthesis of

263

leptosin, a glycoside isolated from mānuka honey. Tetrahedron Lett. 2013, 54, 6916-

264

6919.

265

16.

Kato, Y.; Araki, Y.; Juri, M.; Fujinaka, R.; Ishisaka, A.; Kitamoto, N.; Nitta, Y.;

266

Niwa, T.; Takimoto, Y., Immunochemical authentication of manuka honey using a

267

monoclonal antibody specific to a glycoside of methyl syringate. J. Agric. Food

268

Chem. 2014, 62, 10672-10678.

269

17.

Rückriemen, J.; Schwarzenbolz, U.; Adam, S.; Henle, T., Identification and

270

quantitation of 2-acetyl-1-pyrroline in manuka honey (Leptospermum Scoparium). J.

271

Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 8488-8492.

272

18.

4-pteridones and some related compounds. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1958, 80, 6095-6097.

273 274

19.

20.

Pfleiderer, W.; Hutzenlaub, W., Pteridine, LVII. Synthesen und eigenschaften von lumazin-n-oxiden. Chem. Ber. 1973, 106, 3149-3174.

277 278

Pfleiderer, W.; Fink, H., Pteridine, XXVI. Über die synthese und struktur von 4amino-2-oxo-dihydropteridinen (isopterinen). Chem. Ber. 1963, 96, 2950-2963.

275 276

Curran, W. V.; Angier, R. B., Pteridine chemistry III. 2-amino-1(and 3)6,7-trimethyl-

21.

Ritzmann, G.; Pfleiderer, W., Nucleoside, IX. Synthese und eigenschaften von

279

lumazin-nucleosiden — strukturanaloga des uridins und thymidins. Chem. Ber. 1973,

280

106, 1401-1417.



281

22.

23.

24.

Uhlmann, E.; Pfleiderer, W., Pteridines, LXX. Synthesis and properties of 1,8alkylene-bridged lumazines. Heterocycles 1981, 15, 437-453.

286 287

Southon, I. W.; Pfleiderer, W., Pteridine, LXIV. Synthese und eigenschaften von thiolumazinen. Chem. Ber. 1978, 111, 971-981.

284 285

Ji Ram, V.; Knappe, W. R.; Pfleiderer, W., Synthese und photochemie N-8 substituierter lumazine. Tetrahedron Lett. 1977, 18, 3795-3798.

282 283

Page 14 of 25

25.

Ram, V. J.; Knappe, W. R.; Pfleiderer, W., Pteridine, LXXI. Synthese und

288

photochemisches verhalten von 8-substituierten lumazinen. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1982,

289

1982, 762-779.

290

26.

Bartke, M.; Pfleiderer, W., Oxidations and reactions of 2- and 4-thiolumazine

291

derivatives. Synthesis and properties of pteridine-sulfinates and -sulfonates.

292

Pteridines 1989, 1, 45-56.

293

27.

Acuña-Cueva, E. R.; Hueso-Ureña, F.; Jiménez-Pulido, S. B.; Moreno-Carretero, M.

294

N., Theoretical investigations (PM3) on the coordinative properties of lumazine

295

(pteridine-2,4(1H,3H)-dione) and its methylated derivatives. J. Mol. Model. 2000, 6,

296

433-437.

297

28.

Harris, R. K.; Becker, E. D.; De Menezes, S. M. C.; Granger, P.; Hoffman, R. E.;

298

Zilm, K. W., Further conventions for NMR shielding and chemical shifts (IUPAC

299

recommendations 2008). Magn. Reson. Chem. 2008, 46, 582-598.

300

29.

in some New Zealand honeys. Food Chem. 2016, 192, 1006-1014.

301 302

Bong, J.; Loomes, K. M.; Schlothauer, R. C.; Stephens, J. M., Fluorescence markers

30.

Russell, K. M.; Molan, P. C.; Wilkins, A. L.; Holland, P. T., Identification of some

303

antibacterial constituents of New Zealand manuka honey. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1990,

304

38, 10-13.


Page 15 of 25

305


31.

Chen, M.; Shao, C.-L.; Fu, X.-M.; Kong, C.-J.; She, Z.-G.; Wang, C.-Y., Lumazine

306

peptides penilumamides B–D and the cyclic pentapeptide asperpeptide a from a

307

gorgonian-derived Aspergillus sp. fungus. J. Nat. Prod. 2014, 77, 1601-1606.

308

32.

hydroxy-6,7-dimethylpteridine. J. Org. Chem. 1961, 26, 2129-2132.

309 310

33.

34.

Uhlmann, E.; Pfleiderer, W., Pteridines, LXX, Synthesis and properties of 1,8alkylene-bridged lumazines. Heterocycles 1981, 15, 437-453.

313 314

Brown, D. J.; Jacobsen, N. W., 869. Pteridine studies. Part xiv. Methylation of 2amino-4-hydroxypteridine and related compounds. J. Chem. Soc. 1961, 4413-4420.

311 312

Angier, R.; Curran, W., Notes- pteridine chemistry. V. The methylation of 2-amino-4-

35.

Jung, D.-u.; Kim, Y.; Kang, Y.; Baek, D., Selective oxidation of methyl substituted

315

1,3-dimethyllumazine derivatives with nitric acid. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2001, 22,

316

120-122.

317

36.

Acuña-Cueva, E. R.; Faure, R.; Illán-Cabeza, N. A.; Jiménez-Pulido, S. B.; Moreno-

318

Carretero, M. N., Spectral and XRD studies on perchlorate salts of several Co(II),

319

Ni(II), Cu(II), Zn(II), Cd(II) and Hg(II) complexes from 1-methyllumazine and 1,6,7-

320

trimethyllumazine. Polyhedron 2002, 21, 1961-1968.

321

37.


322

Carretero, M. N.; Quirós-Olozábal, M., Synthesis and characterization of new

323

complexes formed between 1-methyllumazine and 1,6,7-trimethyllumazine ligand

324

with transition metal(II) nitrate. Crystal structure of cobalt(II), copper(II) and

325

cadmium(II) complexes. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2003, 342, 209-218.

326

38.


327

Carretero, M. N.; Quirós-Olozábal, M., Synthesis and characterization of several

328

lumazine derivative complexes of Co(II), Ni(II), Cu(II), Cd(II), Pd(II) and Pt(II). X-



329

ray structures of a mononuclear copper complex and a dinuclear cadmium complex.

330

Inorg. Chim. Acta 2003, 351, 356-362.

331

39.


332

Carretero, M. N.; Quirós-Olozábal, M., Synthesis and structural studies on new

333

MIIX2L2 dihalocomplexes of 1-methyllumazine and 1,6,7-trimethyllumazine.:

334

Crystal structure of copper(II) and palladium(II) complexes. Polyhedron 2003, 22,

335

483-488.

336

40.

Page 16 of 25

Acuña-Cueva, E. R.; Faure, R.; Jiménez-Pulido, S. B.; Moreno-Carretero, M. N.;

337

Peña-Ruiz, T., Study of the chelating capacity of nucleobase analogs with biological

338

interest: XRD structural study and ab initio molecular orbital calculations on 1-methyl

339

and 1,6,7-trimethyllumazine. J. Mol. Struct. 2004, 697, 65-71.

340

41.

Acuña-Cueva, E. R.; Jiménez-Pulido, S. B.; Moreno-Carretero, M. N.; Quirós-

341

Olozábal, M., Gold(III)–pteridine compounds: preparation, spectroscopic, and XRD

342

studies on a new compound containing tetrabromoaurate(III) anions and hydrogen-

343

bonded 1,6,7-trimethyllumazine-oxonium dihydrate cations. Struct. Chem. 2004, 15,

344

159-163.

345

42.

Gala, D.; DiBenedetto, D.; Günter, F.; Kugelman, M.; Maloney, D.; Cordero, M.;

346

Mergelsberg, I., A practical synthesis of “metabolite a1” (AAMU) of caffeine. Org.

347

Process Res. Dev. 1997, 1, 85-87.

348

43.

Chaudhari, S. S.; Thomas, A.; Patil, N. P.; Deshmukh, V. G.; Khairatkar-Joshi, N.;

349

Mukhopadhyay, I. Imidazo [2,1-b] purine derivatives as TRPA1 modulators.

350

WO2009/144548 A1, 2009.

351 352

44.

Fearnley, L.; Greenwood, D. R.; Schmitz, M.; Stephens, J. M.; Schlothauer, R. C.; Loomes, K. M., Compositional analysis of manuka honeys by high-resolution mass


Page 17 of 25


353

spectrometry: Identification of a manuka-enriched archetypal molecule. Food Chem.

354

2012, 132, 948-953.

355



Page 18 of 25

FIGURE CAPTIONS Figure 1. Leptosperin, 1, 2-acetyl-1-pyrroline, 2, lepteridine 3. Figure 2. HPLC chromatograms of (A) mānuka (L. scoparium), (B) rewarewa (Knightia excelsa), (C) clover (Trifoilum repens) and (D) pohutukawa (Metrosideros excelsa) honeys at 320 nm. Figure 3. 1H, 13C-HMBC (red) and 1H, 15N-HMBC (blue) correlations in 3; 1,6,7trimethyllumazine ,4, an isomer of 3. Figure 4. Synthesis of (A) 3,6,7-trimethyllumazine, 3 and (B) 1,6,7-trimethyllumazine, 4.


Page 19 of 25


TABLES

Table 1. Detection of 3 in Various Botanical Samples. Floral Source (Sample Type) L. scoparium (mānuka honey) L. scoparium (mānuka honey) L. scoparium (mānuka honey) L. scoparium (mānuka honey) L. scoparium (mānuka honey) Kunzea ericoides (kānuka honey)

# of samples 2 1 1 1 1 1

Knightia excelsa (rewarewa honey)

2

Trifolium repens (clover honey) Metrosideros robusta (rata honey)

2 2

Weinmania racemosa (kamahi honey)

2

Ixerbia brexioides (tawari honey)

1

Weinmannia silvicola (towai honey) Metrosideros excelsa (pohutukawa honey) Thymus vulgaris (thyme honey) L. scoparium var incarnum (mānuka nectar) L. scoparium var scoparium (mānuka nectar) L. scoparium var myrtifolium (mānuka nectar) Kunzea ericoides (kānuka nectar) Fuscospora solandri (honeydew)

1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2

Location Northland Waikato Eastland Wairarapa South Island Northland Bay of Plenty South Island West Coast Bay of Plenty Bay of Plenty Northland Auckland Otago Glasshouse Glasshouse Glasshouse Glasshouse Canterbury

Concentration of lepteridine (µg/g) 38.35 38.40 39.29 5.23 10.00 3.55 n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. 35.00 79.93 43.70 n.d. n.d.



Page 20 of 25

Table 2. 1H NMR, 13C NMR and 15N NMR Shifts for 3a. HMBCb

Position

δC/δN , type

δH

1

NH

8.42

2

149.9, C

3

154.1, N

4

161.1, C

4a

123.7, C

5

292.0, N

6

158.9, C

7

150.6, C

8

329.9, N

8a

144.8, C

9

28.5, CH3

3.50, s

2, 3, 4

10

22.8, CH3

2.63, s

4a, 5, 6, 7

11

21.9, CH3

2.67, s

6, 7, 8

a 1

13

15

H (400 MHz); C (100 MHz); N (60.8 MHz), chemical shift indirectly determined from 1H, 15N HMBC NMR data. b HMBC correlations are from protons stated to the indicated carbon or nitrogen.


Page 21 of 25


FIGURES

Figure 1



Page 22 of 25

mAU

lepteridine (3)

A, mānuka

mAU

B, rewarewa

mAU

C, clover

mAU

D, pohutukawa

time

Figure 2


Page 23 of 25


Figure 3



A

O HN

O

N H

O

1) HMDS, H2SO4 (cat) reflux

Me

2) MeI, DMF, aqueous workup 71% (2 steps)

NH2

O

5

Page 24 of 25

1) NaNO 2, AcOH H2O

N N H

2) Na2S2O4 NH3(aq) 31% (2 steps)

NH2

6 O

O Me O

NH2

N N H

NH2

O

Me

8 Me

Me

O

AcOH, EtOH reflux 63%

N

O

N H

N

Me

N

Me

N

Me

N

Me

3

7 B

O

O NH2

HN O

N Me 9

NH2

Me

8 Me O

AcOH, H2O reflux 60%

O HN O

N Me 4

Figure 4


Page 25 of 25


TABLE OF CONTENTS GRAPHIC


Isolation, Structural Elucidation, and Synthesis of ... - ACS Publications

Recommend Documents