Subscriber access provided by READING UNIV
Article
Liquid chromatography high-resolution mass spectrometry identifies the glycation sites of bovine serum albumin induced by D-ribose with ultrasonic treatment Nanhai Zhang, Zongcai Tu, Hui Wang, Guangxian Liu, Zhenxing Wang, Tao Huang, Xu Qin, Xing Xie, and A'mei Wang J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b04578 • Publication Date (Web): 27 Dec 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on January 1, 2018
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 34
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
1
Liquid chromatography high-resolution mass spectrometry identifies the
2
glycation sites of bovine serum albumin induced by D-ribose with ultrasonic
3
treatment
4
Nanhai Zhang,a Zongcai Tu,a,b,* Hui Wang,a,* Guangxian Liu,b,c Zhenxing Wang,b Tao
5
Huang,a Xu Qin,a Xing Xie,a A’mei Wanga
6
a
7
Nanchang, Jiangxi 330047, China
8
b
9
China
10
c
State Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology, Nanchang University,
College of Life Sciences, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330022,
Jiangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330200, China
11 12
* Corresponding author:
13
Prof. Zong-cai Tu,
14
99 Ziyang Road, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
15
Fax: +86-791-8812-1868
16
Phone number: +86-791-8812-1868
17
E-mail:
[email protected] (Zongcai Tu)
18
Dr. Hui Wang,
19
235 East Nanjing Road, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
20
Fax: +86-791-8830-5938
21
Phone number: +86-791-8830-5938
22
E-mail:
[email protected] (Hui Wang)
23 1
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 2 of 34
24
ABBREVIATIONS USED
25
MR, Maillard reaction; SDS-PAGE, sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel
26
electrophoresis;
27
spectrometry; HCD, higher-energy collisional dissociation; ETD, electron transfer
28
dissociation; BSA, bovine serum albumin; DHPM, dynamic high pressure
29
microfluidisation; DTT, dithiothreitol; MS, mass spectrometry; MS/MS, tandem mass
30
spectrometry; UV, ultraviolet; DSP, the average degree of substitution per peptide
31
molecule; Trp, tryptophan; Tyr, tyrosine; HPLC, high performance liquid
32
chromatography; UA, urea; IAA, indole-3-acetic acid; Phe, phenylalanine
LCHR-MS,
liquid
chromatography
2
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
high-resolution
mass
Page 3 of 34
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
33
ABSTRACT
34
Ultrasonication is an emerging technology applied in food processing and biological
35
experimental pretreatments. Cavitation phenomena induced during ultrasonic
36
treatment can generate localized high temperature and pressure, which can result in
37
glycation reaction between protein and reducing sugars. In this study, the mixture of
38
bovine serum albumin (BSA) and D-ribose was treated under 600 W for different
39
times. Interestingly, a large amount of carbonized black materials appeared after
40
ultrasonication, while the UV absorbance and intrinsic fluorescence spectra reflecting
41
conformational changes were not obvious. Only 12 sites (11 lysines and 1 arginine) of
42
the BSA with ribose under ultrasonic treatment for 35 min were identified through
43
liquid chromatography high-resolution mass spectrometry (LCHR-MS). K547, K548,
44
R359/R360, and K587 were the most reactive glycated sites, with the average degree
45
of substitution per peptide molecule (DSP) value ranging from 15% to 35%. The
46
glycated modification was distributed not only in domain III, but also in domain I and II.
47
The glycated modification could occur during ultrasonic treatment, thereby influencing
48
the properties of biomacromolecule after extraction.
49
Keywords: BSA, Ultrasonication, Glycation, LCHR-MS, DSP
3
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
50
INTRODUCTION
51
Ultrasound is a high-frequency sound wave that exceeds the upper limit of human
52
hearing frequency range (~20 kHz). When powerful ultrasound is interacting with
53
liquids, its nucleus grows; then the formed gas bubble implosively collapses thereby
54
inducing acoustic cavitation phenomena as the main effect of ultrasound.1 Cavitation
55
generates immense pressure, high temperature and local turbulence that can alter
56
physicochemical and functional properties of materials.2 Thus, ultrasonic treatment is
57
wildly applied in many processing industries (such as chemical, pharmaceutical and
58
cosmetic industries) and experiment pretreatment.3-4 Ultrasound, has been particularly
59
applied in bio-macromolecule processing for the extraction of proteins and for
60
improving their extracting rate,5-6 breaking the cell walls to release DNA rapidly from
61
the microorganisms,7 and for the reducing of the viscosity and the relative molecular
62
weight of the kappa carrageenan in order to promote their applications.8
63
64
The large energy concentration generated from the gas bubbles collapse transforms
65
the kinetic energy of the liquid motion to thermal energy, thereby generating highly
66
localized temperature of approximately 5000 K and pressures exceeding several
67
thousand bars.9 Ultrasonication can lead to the chemical reaction of protein and
68
reducing sugars, such as Maillard reaction (MR), because it can provide enough
69
energy and free amino groups for graft reaction,10 despite the well effect on extraction 4
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 4 of 34
Page 5 of 34
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
70
of proteins and nucleotides. MR can influence aroma, colour and nutritional value of
71
food,11 and some studies have shown that dietary MR products might be correlated
72
with health problems such as diabetes and chronic renal failure and could affect
73
inflammatory markers.12-13 However, a few scholars realized this point and studied
74
it.14 Therefore, the occurrence of glycation of protein and reducing sugars during
75
ultrasonication and the mechanism of glycation during ultrasonication should be
76
explored.
77
78
Glycation is the first step of the MR, which occurs between amino group residues and
79
the reducing sugars. Many experiments have revealed that the ultrasonic pretreatment
80
of the mixture of protein and sugars can promote the formation and the
81
physicochemical and functional properties of glycation products due to structural
82
changes of protein by ultrasonication.14-15 Ultrasonic treatment can accelerate the
83
glycation reaction of β-lactoglobulin with various sugars in aqueous model systems
84
under neutral conditions, can improve antioxidant properties, and can induce minor
85
changes in secondary and tertiary structures.16 Mu et al.10 employed ultrasonication to
86
accelerate the graft reaction of soy protein isolate and gum acacia and to significantly
87
increase the emulsifying properties. However, the mechanism of glycation during
88
ultrasonication remains ambiguous.
89 5
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
90
The extent of the glycation reaction has been recently assessed mostly by measuring
91
the ultraviolet (UV) absorbance and browning intensity of the reaction products,17 free
92
amino acid groups content of glycated proteins,10 fluorescence intensity of glycated
93
proteins,18 and the sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
94
(SDS-PAGE) of the reaction products.19 All these methods can provide the
95
microscopical changes in proteins but cannot find the initial glycated products,
96
without reflecting the glycation site(s), and the glycation extent in every protein sites.
97
98
In recent years, liquid chromatography high-resolution mass spectrometry
99
(LCHR-MS), particularly with higher-energy collisional dissociation (HCD) and
100
electron transfer dissociation (ETD), has been a powerful tool in enabling the
101
unambiguous characterization of peptides with various modifications and evaluating
102
the interaction between amino acid and reducing sugar.16 For example, Tu et al.20
103
determined eight glycated sites from ovalbumin glycated with glucose under
104
freeze-drying processing using LCHR-MS. Our previous study demonstrated that the
105
glycation of the bovine serum albumin (BSA) with D-galactose was improved by
106
ultrasonic pre-treatment and this was followed by LCHR-MS.21
107
108
In the current study, the mixture of BSA (model protein) and D-ribose was treated
6
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 6 of 34
Page 7 of 34
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
109
under ultrasonication at 600 W for 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, and 35 min. Then, the
110
SDS-PAGE, UV, and intrinsic emission fluorescence spectra of the mixture were
111
explored. The glycated sites and the average degree of substitution per peptide
112
molecule (DSP) were characterized by LCHR-MS combined with HCD
113
fragmentation to probe the mechanism of glycation during ultrasonic treatment.
114
115
MATERIALS AND METHODS
116
Materials
117
BSA (V9000933), D-(-)-ribose(V900389) and pepsin (P6887) were purchased from
118
Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Dithiothreitol (DTT) was purchased from
119
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (Waltham, MA, USA). All other chemical reagents were
120
of analytical grade and high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) grade.
121
Ultrapure water used in the experiments was purified from a water purification system
122
(Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA).
123
124
Sample Preparation
125
The mixture of BSA and ribose (at a mass ratio of 1:1) was dissolved in the Tris-HCl
126
buffer (200 mM, pH 8.0) to obtain a final protein concentration of 10 mg/mL. The 7
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
127
solution was split into eight aliquots. Sonication of the eight aliquots was carried out
128
using an ultrasonic cell disruption instrument (JY98-IIIDN, Ningbo Xinzhi
129
Instruments, Inc., Ningbo, China, 20kHz) with a 2.0 cm diameter probe. The sample
130
vessel was kept in an ice bath, and the solution was treated under 600 W of power
131
output for 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, and 35 min with a pulsation turned 1 and 3 s,
132
respectively. Then the sample solution after ultrasonication was filtered with a
133
Centricon centrifugal filter unit (10 kDa cutoffs, Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA) to
134
remove the free ribose and salts. The centration of protein was adjusted to 1 mg/mL,
135
and the resultant was stored at 4 °C for subsequent use. The mixture of BSA and
136
ribose with ultrasonic treatment for 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, and 35 min was denoted
137
as NU-BSAR, U-BSAR-5, U-BSAR-10, U-BSAR-15, U-BSAR-20, U-BSAR-25,
138
U-BSAR-30 and U-BSAR-35, respectively.
139
140
SDS-PAGE
141
SDS-PAGE was performed using a vertical gel electrophoresis cell (Bio-Rad,
142
Richmond, CA, USA) following a modified method of Laemmli.22 Stacking and
143
separating gels at 5% and 12%, respectively, were prepared. Prior to electrophoresis,
144
the samples were mixed with loading buffer. Then, the resultant was heated for 7 min.
145
Ten microliters of the mixed solution were put on the gel with an initial voltage of
146
80 V for 30 min and then at 100 V for 1.5 h. Thereafter, gels were stained with 0.05% 8
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 8 of 34
Page 9 of 34
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
147
Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 and destained in a mixture of 5% methanol and 7.5%
148
acetic acid. Low molecular weight markers (14.4-97.4 kDa) were used for a molecular
149
weight reference of samples.
150
151
UV Absorption and Intrinsic Fluorescence Spectroscopy
152
UV absorption spectra of samples were measured with a U-2910 spectrophotometer
153
(Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). UV absorption spectra were recorded from 260 nm to
154
300 nm.18
155
The intrinsic emission fluorescence spectra of the protein samples (1 mg/mL) were
156
obtained with an F-7000 fluorescence spectrophotometer (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). The
157
protein solutions were excited at 290 nm, and emission spectra were scanned from
158
320 nm to 370 nm at a slit width of 5 nm for excitation and emission.23
159
160
Sample Digestion
161
Two hundred micrograms of U-BSAR-35 were added to a centrifuge tube containing
162
an amount of DTT to obtain a final sample concentration of 100 mM. The sample was
163
incubated in boiling water bath for 5 min and then cooled in an ice bath. Two hundred
164
micrograms of urea (UA) buffer (8 M urea and 150 mM Tris-HCl buffer at pH 8.0) 9
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
165
were added to the tube, and centrifuged at 14000 g for 15 min, and the filtrate was
166
thrown away. One hundred microliters of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) (50 mM IAA in
167
UA buffer) was added to the above tube and oscillated at 600 rpm for 1 min. After 30
168
min of incubation in the dark at room temperature, the mixture was centrifuged at
169
14000 g for 10 min. One hundred microliters of UA buffer and HCl buffer (pH 2.2)
170
were added to the above tube in order and the mixture was centrifuged. One hundred
171
microliters of HCl buffer (pH 2.2).
172
173
Forty microliters of pepsin solution (40 µg pepsin in 40 µl pH 2.2 HCl buffer) was
174
added, and the mixture was stored in a 4 °C refrigerator for 10 min. Then, the mixture
175
was centrifuged, and the filtrate was used to the analysis of mass spectrometry (MS).
176
177
Analysis by HPLC-HCD-MS/MS
178
The glycated sites and glycation extent were investigated following the method of Tu
179
et al.20 The effluent was infused into an LTQ-Orbitrap Velos mass spectrometry
180
(Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) for tandem mass spectrometry
181
(MS/MS) analysis to identify protein glycation though positive ion detection. A total
182
of 20 fragment maps (MS/MS2 scans) reflecting the mass-to-charge ratio of peptides
183
and their fragments were collected after each full scan. The ions detected in the 10
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 10 of 34
Page 11 of 34
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
184
precursor ion scanning were further subjected to HCD fragmentation to detect the
185
fragment ions. Dynamic exclusion was enabled with an exclusion duration of 90 s.
186
187
To further compare the glycation extent of each peptide, the DSP of BSA was
188
calculated according to the following formulation21:
189
DSP =
190
Where I is the intensity of various glycated BSA peptides, and i is the number of ribose
191
units attached to the peptide in each glycated form.
∑ in= 0 i × I (peptide + i × ribose) ∑ in= 0 I (peptide + i × ribose)
192
193
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
194
SDS-PAGE
195
As shown in Figure 1B, the carbonized black substances increased at the bottom of the
196
centrifuge tubes with the prolonging of ultrasonic time. On the one hand, sugars could
197
be caramelized, and then the carbonized black substances were produced due to the
198
localized high temperature produced by ultrasonication. On the other hand, protein
199
could be carbonized due to the cavitation effect that generates transient high
200
temperature during ultrasonication. The ultrasonic treatment used in this experiment 11
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
201
was equipped with a cooling system that could keep the sample at a low temperature,
202
while protein could change owing to the localized hot spots produced by
203
ultrasonication.
204
205
SDS-PAGE profiles of the samples are shown in Figure 1A. Compared with NU-BSAR,
206
no significant mobilities of bands between samples under ultrasonic treatment with the
207
prolonging of time were found on the SDS-PAGE, suggesting that ultrasonication did
208
not change the profile of BSA under our experiment conditions. However,
209
Stanic-Vucinic et al.16 found that protein bands exhibit a minor shift after
210
ultrasonication in the presence of some sugars, thereby resulting in dimer formation;
211
therefore, high-intensity ultrasound can induce the glycation of β-lactoglobulin-ribose.
212
In the previous study, the changed molecule weight of β-lactoglobulin could be
213
observed in SDS-PAGE probably because of its small molecular weight. Nevertheless,
214
the molecular weight of BSA was larger than that of β-lactoglobulin, which was
215
responsible for the unobvious mobilities of bands. Therefore, LCHR-MS should be
216
used to prove whether the glycation modification of protein occurred.
217
218
UV Absorption and Fluorescence Spectra Analysis
219
The UV absorption spectra of protein were primarily dependent on the absorption of 12
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 12 of 34
Page 13 of 34
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
220
light by side chain groups of chromophoric amino acids, such as tryptophan (Trp),
221
tyrosine (Tyr), and phenylalanine (Phe). The absorption peaks of Trp and Tyr were at
222
280 nm, while the absorption peak of Phe was at 257 nm.24 When conformation of a
223
protein changed, the chromophores would be exposed to the surface of the protein,
224
thereby increasing the intensity of absorption peak. As shown in Figure 2A, the
225
maximum absorption peak was at 276 nm around 280 nm, demonstrating that the UV
226
absorption spectrum of BSA was depended on Trp and Tyr residues. UV absorption
227
intensity increased at different levels during ultrasonication from 5 min to 25 min.
228
The increase in absorption suggested that Trp and Tyr residues were exposed on the
229
surface of the protein molecule, as a consequence of unfolding of the structure.
230
Compared with NU-BSAR, U-BSAR-30 had a very slight decrease in the intensity of
231
the maximum absorption peak. Protein refolding could occur at different levels during
232
ultrasonication from 5 min to 30 min, which was attributed to the localized high
233
temperature produced by ultrasonication.25 U-BSAR-35 had the highest intensity due
234
to the largest structural changes. In general, the UV absorption intensity under
235
ultrasonication had insignificant differences.
236
237
The intrinsic fluorescence spectra of protein were attributed to the polarity of the
238
environment of the Trp residues or their specific interactions. The intensity of
239
fluorescence would decrease when the chromophores were exposed to a solvent.26 As
13
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
240
presented in Figure 2B, NU-BSAR exhibited a fluorescence emission maximum at
241
342 nm, when excited at 290 nm. Notably, compared with NU-BSAR, the ultrasonic
242
treatment increased fluorescence intensity from 5 min to 20 min, whereas decreased
243
the intensity from 25 min to 35 min. Fluorescence intensity declined as the treatment
244
time increased, and the wavelength of fluorescence emission peak was not shifted.
245
The increase in intensity indicated the gradual exposure of Trp toward hydrophilic
246
surroundings. As a result, conformational changes in protein occurred in the vicinity
247
of the Trp residues because of the thermal denaturation of protein by ultrasound.15
248
Under ultrasonic treatment for 25−35 min, the decline in fluorescence intensity was
249
due to the quenching of fluorescence, indicating that Trp could contact with polar
250
solvent.18 Therefore, the fluorescence spectrum analysis indicated that disruption of
251
the tertiary structure of BSA could occur insignificantly under ultrasonic treatment,
252
thereby exposing the chromophores to solvent.
253
254
The insignificant differences in UV absorption spectra and the slight changes in
255
intrinsic fluorescence emission spectra indicating that the reaction was at the early
256
stage of MR could be due to the steric hindrance effects on the 3D structure of protein
257
in ribose solvent.27 Some functional properties of food proteins such as
258
radical-scavenging activity, reducing power, etc. could be improved with this
259
structural change,16 thereby possibly affecting the quality of food proteins.
14
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 14 of 34
Page 15 of 34
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
260
261
Peptide Mapping and Glycation Identification
262
U-BSAR-35 was used for MS measurement because of its significant change in UV
263
and intrinsic fluorescence spectra, which could result in the highest glycation extent.
264
Prior to understanding the influence of ultrasonication treatment on the glycation
265
reaction of BSA, the complete peptide map of the glycated sites of BSA with and
266
without ultrasonication treatment should be first obtained. We performed pepsin
267
digestion followed by LCHR-MS/MS. Pepsin was selected as the non-specific
268
protease because of its excellent property in cleaving peptide bonds between
269
hydrophobic residues. Accordingly, small peptides beneficial to subsequent MS
270
analysis could be generated and the difference in protein structure in the digestion
271
process could be decreased.28 Then, the peptic peptides identified and determined by
272
LCHR-MS/MS were listed in Table S1 (provided in the Supporting Information).
273
274
The structure of the glycated BSA could be analyzed by identifying the glycation sites.
275
To identify the glycated amino acid residues, we performed MS/MS with HCD after
276
pepsin digestion. The MS spectra of the representative glycated peptides of the
277
BSA-ribose under ultrasonic treatment were shown in Figure 3. Then, the glycation
278
peptides could be determined from the mass shift. Theoretically, if a peptide was
15
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
279
glycated by one molecule of ribose via the early stage of MR, accompanied by loss of
280
a water molecules,11 then the corresponding m/z peaks with charges of 1, 2, and 3
281
would display a mass increase of 132 Da with m/z changes of 132, 66, and 44,
282
respectively.16 For dual-glycated peptides, the mass increase would be 264.0845 Da.
283
For example, the m/z peaks of the unglycated peptides 355-364 and 570-580 (as
284
shown in Figure 3B and 3D) were 467.21813+ and 433.55173+, while the
285
corresponding m/z peaks of glycated peptides had an increase in m/z of 44.0140.
286
Similarly, the ion peaks with m/z of 619.79622+ and 535.76152+ were identified as the
287
unglycated peptides 179-188 and 419-427 (as shown in Figure 3A and 3C), while the
288
new peaks with the m/z values at 685.81692+ and 601.78232+ had an increase in m/z of
289
shift 66.0211. The m/z differences with the increase in mass of 132 Da indicated that all
290
these peptides were modified by one molecule of ribose under ultrasonic treatment.
291
Figure 3A shows that the m/z peak of the unglycated peptide 546-552 was 401.26292+.
292
New peaks with the m/z values at 467.28432+ and 533.78182+ with a mass shift of 132
293
and 264 Da, respectively, were found. Therefore, the peptide attached two molecules of
294
ribose.
295
296
The possible and preferable glycation groups were the α-amino group of N-terminus,
297
the ε-amino groups of lysine residues and the guanidine groups of arginine residues
298
during the MR process.29 In this paper, HCD MS/MS was performed to locate the exact
16
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 16 of 34
Page 17 of 34
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
299
glycation sites, especially for peptides with multiple glycation sites. For example,
300
Figure 4B and 4C show the HCD MS/MS spectrum of the dual-glycated peptide
301
546-522 with the sequence of IKKQTAL at m/z 467.28432+ and 533.78182+.
302
Considering the compete matching of b and y fragment ions and according to Figure 4A,
303
K547 and K548 were the glycated sites. Similarly, Figure S1A shows the HCD MS/MS
304
spectrum of the single glycated peptide 179-188 at m/z 685.81692+. A series of detected
305
b and y fragment ions fully matched with the fragmentation of the peptide
306
YYANK(gly)YNGVF, thereby confirming that the glycation site occurred at K183.
307
Similarly, K420 was identified as the glycation site of the glycated peptide 419-427
308
(EKLGEYGFQ) at m/z 601.78232+ (Figure S1B).
309
310
Figure S2 shows the peptide 243-251 contained two possible glycation sites at K245
311
and K248 and fragment ions that fully matched with the fragmentation of the peptide.
312
However, we could not exactly identify the glycation site of this peptide due to the
313
limited MS/MS sensitivity. The same situation occurred at the peptide 355-364
314
(YEYSRRHPEY), which contained two possible glycation sites at R335 and R336. The
315
other glycated sites were identified from the fragmentation of the corresponding
316
glycation peptides (Table 1). Only 12 sites of U-BSAR-35 were identified, including 11
317
lysine residues and 1 arginine residue. The ε-amino groups of the lysine residues were
318
the major reactive groups in the MR during ultrasonic treatment. This result was in
17
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
319
accordance with the previous studies, wherein glycated sites predominantly located at
320
lysine but not at arginine.20-21,
321
U-BSAR-35, which was also observed in glycated BSA.21 Therefore, this finding
322
shown that the glycation of BSA occurred under ultrasonic treatment for 35 min at the
323
presence of ribose.
30
Moreover, arginine residue was modified in
324
325
Glycation Extent and Structural Changes of BSA During Ultrasonic Treatment
326
The DSP of each glycated peptide should be calculated to evaluate the degree of the
327
glycation (as shown in Table 1) and thus understand the relative glycation reactivity of
328
peptides during ultrasonic treatment. With regard to DSP values, K547, K548,
329
R359/R258, and K587 with a DSP of up to 15% were the most reactive sites to
330
glycation with ribose in BSA. However, most of DSP values ranged from 1% to 7%
331
for other peptides. Glycated peptides were distributed in several parts of the protein,
332
where structural perturbation occurred (Figure 5). This finding suggested that
333
ultrasonic treatment could induce a structural change in protein,21 the exposing a large
334
number of reactive sites of the protein,31 and thereby obtaining high probability of
335
glycation.16
336
337
The peptide 1-18 is a signal peptide and the following peptide 19-24 is a basic 18
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 18 of 34
Page 19 of 34
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
338
propeptide, which are cleaved during protein maturation or activation.32 Therefore, the
339
mature BSA sequence included 583 residues. The glycation sites in Table 1 were 24
340
times than the marking glycation sites in Figure 5. The glycation sites identified above
341
demonstrates that the protein structure was perturbed by ultrasonication. BSA was
342
composed of three domains, each of which was formed by six helices, including
343
domain I comprising residues 1-184, domain II comprising residues 185-377, and
344
domain III comprising residues 378-583.33 As shown in Figure 5A, the glycation sites
345
covered all three domains, including 3, 4, 5 glycation sites in domain I, II, and III.
346
347
In the tertiary structure of BSA (Figure 5A), the glycated sites were mainly located at
348
the α-helix and few located at random coil and β-turn. K41 and K396 were situated on
349
the surface of the spherical protein, where the glycation occurred under
350
ultrasonication. K523 and K524 had a very high reactivity for glycation because its
351
neighboring amino acid was Ile, which could play a role in increasing lysine reactivity
352
and promoting glycation.34 K563, which was located at the outer surface of the
353
hydrophilic area in the tertiary structure, also had a high extent of glycation. The
354
reason was due to its several surrounding hydrophilic amino acids, including Glu548,
355
Phe550, Val551, Ala552, Phe553, Val554, Asp555, Lys(K)556, Ala559, Ala560,
356
Asp561, Asp562, Lys(K)563, Glu564, Ala565, Phe567, Ala568, Val569, Glu570,
357
Pro572, Lys573, and Val575 (as shown in Figure 5B).20 Therefore, ribose could be
19
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
358
easily closed to K563 and K556 with the surrounding hydrophilic amino acids.
359
Similarly, K221/K224 was a glycated site because of its neighboring Phe and several
360
hydrophilic amino acids. R335/R336 exhibited a very high extent of glycation. This
361
result could be attributed to the opening of BSA structure, thereby allowing ribose to
362
be close to R335/R336. H337, which was the catalytic basic residue, might help
363
promote glycation.29 With the structure of BSA unfolded, K294 and K350 distributed
364
in domain II were also glycated with ribose. In addition, K106 and K159 were
365
situated at the inner part of the hydrophilic pocket of domain I such that several
366
changes occurred in domain I. Given the partial unfolding of protein, Trp probe
367
(Trp134 and Trp213) might rapidly and largely exposed to the solvent, thereby
368
changing the fluorescence spectra.35
369
370
The glycation reaction of BSA occurred not only in domain III but also in domains I
371
and II during ultrasonic treatment at the presence of ribose owing to the structural
372
changes of BSA. This result conforms with a previous study, wherein they reported
373
that the increasing glycation sites induced by ultrasonic pretreatment are also
374
distributed throughout the three domains.21 However, the number of glycated sites in
375
the present study (Table 1) was fewer than the number reported by Zhang et al.21, and
376
the current glycation sites were slightly different from those by Zhang et al.21 The
377
reason could be that we applied ultrasonication on protein–saccharide, whereas Zhang
20
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 20 of 34
Page 21 of 34
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
378
et al.21 applied ultrasonication only on protein combined with glycation. Furthermore,
379
the treatment time in the present study was longer than that by Zhang et al.21 A
380
previous study demonstrated that the glycation sites of BSA induced by dynamic high
381
pressure microfluidisation (DHPM) pretreatment are mainly in domains II and III not
382
in domain I. A similar result was reported on BSA denaturation induced by
383
guanidinium hydrochloride.36-37 DHPM induces high energy in a short time whereas
384
ultrasonication produces high energy in a long time, thereby resulting in the difference
385
between the current and previous results.
386
387
In the present study, SDS-PAGE, UV, and intrinsic fluorescence spectra reflecting
388
conformational changes had no obvious differences. Twelve glycated sites (11 lysines
389
and 1 arginine) were identified using LCHR-MS/MS, and the DSP of the most
390
reactive ribose glycation sites in BSA were up to 15%. The glycated modification was
391
distributed not only in domain III, but also in domain I and II. This result was
392
attributed to the structural changes of BSA under ultrasonic treatment for 35 min at
393
the presence of ribose and covalent binding of ribose to BSA. On the one hand,
394
ultrasonic treatment could be applicable to facilitate physical and functional properties
395
of food proteins via changing its structure and improving glycation. On the other hand,
396
this result could instruct the extraction of biomolecules such as proteins and
397
nucleotides through controlling the power or time of ultrasonic treatment to protect
21
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
398
the biomolecules’ quality.
399
400
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
401
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China
402
(NSFC) (No. 21706111), the earmarked fund for China Agriculture Research System
403
(CARS-45), and Jiangxi province science and technology support program
404
(20161BBF60021).
405
406
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
407
Table S1, Figure S1 and Figure S2
408
409
REFERENCES
410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420
(1) Rooze, J.; Rebrov, E. V.; Schouten, J. C.; Keurentjes, J. T., Dissolved gas and ultrasonic cavitation--a review. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2013, 20 (1), 1-11. (2) Awad, T. S.; Moharram, H. A.; Shaltout, O. E.; Asker, D.; Youssef, M. M., Applications of ultrasound in analysis, processing and quality control of food: A review. Food Res. Int. 2012, 48 (2), 410-427. (3) Bhattacharya, D. M.; Pratap, U. R.; Wankhade, A. V.; Zodape, S. P., Volumetric and ultrasonic approach in the investigation of critical micellar phenomenon of amphiphilic drugs in aqueous solutions at different temperatures. J. Mol. Liq. 2016, 214, 117-127. (4) Mahmoodi, N. O.; Mohammadi Zeydi, M.; Biazar, E., Ultrasound-promoted one-pot four-component synthesis of novel biologically active 3-aryl-2,4-dithioxo-1,3,5-triazepane-6,7-dione and their toxicity investigation. J. 22
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 22 of 34
Page 23 of 34
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462
Sulfur Chem. 2016, 1-9. (5) Kadam, S. U.; Tiwari, B. K.; Álvarez, C.; O'Donnell, C. P., Ultrasound applications for the extraction, identification and delivery of food proteins and bioactive peptides. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 46 (1), 60-67. (6) Vilkhu, K.; Mawson, R.; Simons, L.; Bates, D., Applications and opportunities for ultrasound assisted extraction in the food industry — A review. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2008, 9 (2), 161-169. (7) Hohnadel, M.; Felden, L.; Fijuljanin, D.; Jouette, S.; Chollet, R., A new ultrasonic high-throughput instrument for rapid DNA release from microorganisms. J. Microbiol. Methods 2014, 99, 71-80. (8) Azizi, R.; Farahnaky, A., Ultrasound assisted-viscosifying of kappa carrageenan without heating. Food Hydrocolloids 2016, 61, 85-91. (9) Suslick, K. S.; Didenko, Y.; Fang, M. M.; Hyeon, T.; Kolbeck, K. J.; McNamara, W. B.; Mdleleni, M. M.; Wong, M., Acoustic cavitation and its chemical consequences. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 1999, 357 (1751), 335-353. (10) Mu, L.; Zhao, M.; Yang, B.; Zhao, H.; Cui, C.; Zhao, Q., Effect of ultrasonic treatment on the graft reaction between soy protein isolate and gum acacia and on the physicochemical properties of conjugates. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58 (7), 4494-9. (11) Martins, S. I. F. S.; Jongen, W. M. F.; Boekel, M. A. J. S. V., A review of Maillard reaction in food and implications to kinetic modelling. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2000, 11 (9–10), 364-373. (12) Sebeková, K.; Somoza, V., Dietary advanced glycation endproducts (AGEs) and their health effects - PRO. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2007, 51 (9), 1079-1084. (13) Poulsen, M. W.; Hedegaard, R. V.; Andersen, J. M.; Courten, B. D.; Bügel, S.; Nielsen, J.; Skibsted, L. H.; Dragsted, L. O., Advanced glycation endproducts in food and their effects on health. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2013, 60 (10), 10. (14) Shi, W.-H.; Sun, W.-W.; Yu, S.-J.; Zhao, M.-M., Study on the characteristic of bovine serum albumin-glucose model system, treated by ultrasonic. Food Res. Int. 2010, 43 (8), 2115-2118. (15) Zhao, C. B.; Zhou, L. Y.; Liu, J. Y.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Wu, F., Effect of ultrasonic pretreatment on physicochemical characteristics and rheological properties of soy protein/sugar Maillard reaction products. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 53 (5), 2342. (16) Stanic-Vucinic, D.; Prodic, I.; Apostolovic, D.; Nikolic, M.; Velickovic, T. C., Structure and antioxidant activity of beta-lactoglobulin-glycoconjugates obtained by high-intensity-ultrasound-induced Maillard reaction in aqueous model systems under neutral conditions. Food Chem. 2013, 138 (1), 590-9. (17) Corzo-Martinez, M.; Montilla, A.; Megias-Perez, R.; Olano, A.; Moreno, F. J.; Villamiel, M., Impact of high-intensity ultrasound on the formation of lactulose and Maillard reaction glycoconjugates. Food Chem. 2014, 157, 186-92. (18) Zhang, Q. T.; Tu, Z. C.; Wang, H.; Huang, X. Q.; Fan, L. L.; Bao, Z. Y.; Xiao, H., Functional properties and structure changes of soybean protein isolate after subcritical 23
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504
water treatment. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 52 (6), 3412-21. (19) Zhang, Q.-T.; Tu, Z.-C.; Xiao, H.; Wang, H.; Huang, X.-Q.; Liu, G.-X.; Liu, C.-M.; Shi, Y.; Fan, L.-L.; Lin, D.-R., Influence of ultrasonic treatment on the structure and emulsifying properties of peanut protein isolate. Food Bioprod. Process. 2014, 92 (1), 30-37. (20) Tu, Z.-c.; Zhong, B.-z.; Wang, H., Identification of glycated sites in ovalbumin under freeze-drying processing by liquid chromatography high-resolution mass spectrometry. Food Chem. 2017, 226, 1-7. (21) Zhang, Q.; Tu, Z.; Wang, H.; Huang, X.; Shi, Y.; Sha, X.; Xiao, H., Improved glycation after ultrasonic pretreatment revealed by high-performance liquid chromatography-linear ion trap/Orbitrap high-resolution mass spectrometry. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62 (12), 2522-30. (22) Laemmli, U. K., Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 1970, 227 (5259), 680-685. (23) Huang, X.; Tu, Z.; Xiao, H.; Wang, H.; Zhang, L.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Niu, P., Characteristics and antioxidant activities of ovalbumin glycated with different saccharides under heat moisture treatment. Food Res. Int. 2012, 48 (2), 866-872. (24) Davies, M. J.; Truscott, R. J., Photo-oxidation of proteins and its role in cataractogenesis. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B: Biol. 2001, 63 (1), 114-125. (25) Seckler, R.; Jaenicke, R., Protein folding and protein refolding. FASEB J. 1992, 6 (8), 2545-52. (26) Pallarès, I.; Vendrell, J.; Avilés, F. X.; Ventura, S., Amyloid fibril formation by a partially structured intermediate state of α-chymotrypsin. J. Mol. Biol. 2004, 342 (1), 321-331. (27) Altoe', P.; Bernardi, F.; Garavelli, M.; Orlandi, G.; Negri, F., Solvent effects on the vibrational activity and photodynamics of the green fluorescent protein chromophore: A quantum-chemical study. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127 (11), 3952-3963. (28) Wang, H.; Tu, Z. C.; Liu, G. X.; Zhang, L.; Chen, Y., Identification and quantification of the phosphorylated ovalbumin by high resolution mass spectrometry under dry-heating treatment. Food Chem. 2016, 210, 141. (29) Huang, X.; Tu, Z.; Wang, H.; Zhang, Q.; Shi, Y.; Xiao, H., Increase of Ovalbumin Glycation by the Maillard Reaction after Disruption of the Disulfide Bridge Evaluated by Liquid Chromatography and High Resolution Mass Spectrometry. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61 (9), 2253. (30) Liu, J.; Tu, Z. C.; Shao, Y. H.; Wang, H.; Liu, G. X.; Sha, X. M.; Zhang, L.; Yang, P., Improved antioxidant activity and glycation of α-lactalbumin after ultrasonic pretreatment revealed by high-resolution mass spectrometry. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017. (31) Stanic-Vucinic, D.; Stojadinovic, M.; Atanaskovic-Markovic, M.; Ognjenovic, J.; Gronlund, H.; van Hage, M.; Lantto, R.; Sancho, A. I.; Velickovic, T. C., Structural changes and allergenic properties of beta-lactoglobulin upon exposure to high-intensity ultrasound. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2012, 56 (12), 1894-905. 24
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 24 of 34
Page 25 of 34
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520
(32) Dugaiczyk, A.; Law, S. W.; Dennison, O. E., Nucleotide sequence and the encoded amino acids of human serum albumin mRNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1982, 79 (1), 71. (33) Carter, D. C.; Ho, J. X., Structure of serum albumin. Adv. Protein Chem. 1994, 45 (6), 153-176. (34) Mennella, C.; Visciano, M.; Napolitano, A.; Del Castillo, M. D.; Fogliano, V., Glycation of lysine‐containing dipeptides. J. Pept. Sci. 2006, 12 (4), 291-296. (35) Militello, V.; Vetri, V.; Leone, M., Conformational changes involved in thermal aggregation processes of bovine serum albumin. Biophys. Chem. 2003, 105 (1), 133-141. (36) Huang, X.; Tu, Z.; Wang, H.; Zhang, Q.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Niu, P.; Shi, Y.; Xiao, H., Glycation promoted by dynamic high pressure microfluidisation pretreatment revealed by high resolution mass spectrometry. Food Chem. 2013, 141 (3), 3250-9. (37) Togashi, D. M.; Ryder, A. G.; O'Shaughnessy, D., Monitoring local unfolding of bovine serum albumin during denaturation using steady-state and time-resolved fluorescence spectroscopy. J. Fluoresc. 2010, 20 (2), 441-452.
521
25
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Figure Captions:
Figure 1. SDS-PAGE profiles (A) and the bottom image of solution (B) of BSA with ribose under ultrasonic treatment for different times (M: molecular weight marker; N, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, and 35: NU-BSAR, U-BSAR-5, U-BSAR-10, U-BSAR-15, U-BSAR-20, U-BSAR-25, U-BSAR-30, and U-BSAR-35).
Figure 2. UV absorption spectra (A) and intrinsic fluorescence emission spectra (B) of BSA with ribose under ultrasonic treatment for different times.
Figure 3. The MS spectra of the representative glycated peptides of U-BSAR-35. (A) peptide 179-188 at m/z 619.79622+, (B) peptide 355-364 at m/z 467.21813+, (C) peptide 419-427 at m/z 535.76152+, and (D) peptide 570-580 at m/z 433.55173+. The identified peptides are labelled using residue numbers. Glycation is indicated by double headed arrows. The m/z differences between the glycated and unglycated peptides are indicated above the arrows.
Figure 4. The MS spectra (A) and HCD MS/MS spectrum with peak at m/z 467.28432+ and 533.78182+ (B, C) of glycated peptide (546-552) of U-BSAR-35. The identified
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 26 of 34
Page 27 of 34
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
peptides are labelled using residue numbers. Glycation is indicated by double headed arrows. The m/z differences of between the glycated and unglycated peptides are indicated above the arrows. The sequence of each peptide is shown at the top of the mass spectra. b and y ions are shown in the mass spectra, and two glycation sites are remarked by different colors.
Figure 5. Ribbon diagram (A) of the glycated BSA (PDB 4F5S) and partial amino acid residues (B). The lysine residues are colour coded as follows: grey = framework of BSA; red = high content of glycated amino acid residues of BSA under ultrasonication with ribose; green = low content of glycated amino acid residues of BSA under ultrasonication with ribose. In the partial ribbon diagram, the colour code is as follows: yellow = lysine residues; red = hydrophilic amino acid residues; blue = hydrophobic amino acid residues; white = neutral amino acid residues.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 28 of 34
Table:
Table 1. Glycated peptides of U-BSAR-35 peptide location
m/z
∆ppm
sequencea
glycated peptide m/z
DSP
glycated site
58-65
487.7248 2+
2.36
(Q)C(CAM)PFDEHVK(L)
553.2448 2+
2.08
K65
127-136
563.7724 2+
0.0265
(F)LSHKDDSPDL(P)
629.7944 2+
0.98
K130
178-188
676.3385
2+
742.3591
2+
4.12
K183
179-188
619.7962
2+
0.867
(L)YYANKYNGVF(Q)
685.8169
2+
6.57
K183
180-188
538.2642 2+
0.374
(Y)YANKYNGVF(Q)
604.2857 2+
4.44
K183
243-251
541.2882 2+
1.34
(L)SQKFPKAEF(V)
607.3092 2+
4.87
K245/K248
316-331
861.4533 2+
2.16
(E)VEKDAIPENLPPLTAD(F)
927.4737 2+
2.99
K318
355-364
467.2181
3+
32.61
R359/R360
370-380
2.22
K374
3.54
K420
27.70
K547, K548
1.52
K580
15.87
K587
1.19
(L)LYYANKYNGVF(Q)
3+
0.577
(L)YEYSRRHPEY(A)
511.2647
653.8727 2+
1.22
(L)LRLAKEYEATL(E)
719.8940 2+
419-427
535.7615 2+
0.394
(F)EKLGEYGFQ(N)
601.7823 2+
546-552
401.2629
2+
570-580
433.5517
3+
587-598
646.3049 2+ a
-0.925
(Q)IKKQTAL(V)
2+
467.2843 /533.7818 3+
-3.38
(T)VMENFVAFVDK(C)
477.5657
2.35
(D)KEAC(CAM)FAVEGPKL(V)
712.3259 2+
CAM refers to the cystine residue alkylated by carbamidomethyl.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
2+
Page 29 of 34
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Figure Graphics:
Figure 1. SDS-PAGE profiles (A) and the bottom image of solution (B) of BSA with ribose under ultrasonic treatment for different times (M: molecular weight marker; N, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, and 35: NU-BSAR, U-BSAR-5, U-BSAR-10, U-BSAR-15, U-BSAR-20, U-BSAR-25, U-BSAR-30, and U-BSAR-35).
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Abs
0.75
Page 30 of 34
A U-BSAR-35 U-BSAR-15 U-BSAR-5 U-BSAR-25 U-BSAR-20 U-BSAR-10 NU-BSAR U-BSAR-30
0.50
0.25 260
270 280 Wavelength (nm)
290
2800
Fluorescence intensity (a.u.)
B 2400 U-BSAR-5 U-BSAR-10 U-BSAR-15 U-BSAR-20 NU-BSAR U-BSAR-25 U-BSAR-30 U-BSAR-35
2000
1600
1200 320
330
340 350 Wavelength (nm)
360
370
Figure 2. UV absorption spectra (A) and intrinsic fluorescence emission spectra (B) of BSA with ribose under ultrasonic treatment for different times.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 31 of 34
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Figure 3. The MS spectra of the representative glycated peptides of U-BSAR-35. (A) peptide 179-188 at m/z 619.79622+, (B) peptide 355-364 at m/z 467.21813+, (C) peptide 419-427 at m/z 535.76152+, and (D) peptide 570-580 at m/z 433.55173+. The identified peptides are labelled using residue numbers. Glycation is indicated by double headed arrows. The m/z differences between the glycated and unglycated peptides are indicated above the arrows.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Figure 4. The MS spectra (A) and HCD MS/MS spectrum with peak at m/z 467.28432+ and 533.78182+ (B, C) of glycated peptide (546-552) of U-BSAR-35. The identified peptides are labelled using residue numbers. Glycation is indicated by double headed arrows. The m/z differences of between the glycated and unglycated peptides are indicated above the arrows. The sequence of each peptide is shown at the top of the mass spectra. b and y ions are shown in the mass spectra, and two glycation sites are remarked by different colors.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 32 of 34
Page 33 of 34
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Figure 5. Ribbon diagram (A) of the glycated BSA (PDB 4F5S) and partial amino acid residues (B). The lysine residues are colour coded as follows: grey = framework of BSA; red = high content of glycated amino acid residues of BSA under ultrasonication with ribose; green = low content of glycated amino acid residues of BSA under ultrasonication with ribose. In the partial ribbon diagram, the colour code is as follows: yellow = lysine residues; red = hydrophilic amino acid residues; blue = hydrophobic amino acid residues; white = neutral amino acid residues.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Table of Contents Graphic:
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 34 of 34