Magnetic resonance measurements of proton exchange in aqueous

Robert L. Vold, E. S. Daniel, and S. O. Chan. J. Am. Chem. Soc. , 1970, 92 ... S. Connor , Jeremy K. Nicholson , and Jeremy R. Everett. Analytical Che...
0 downloads 0 Views 669KB Size
- S,l sin p

s, = S,! S, =

$ 1

sin p

+ S,t cos p

where we have assumed axial symmetry. The angle y is then arbitrary and we have set it equal to 0”. The expressions for I,, I,, and I, may be obtained by replacing the S’s by Z’s, and p by p’. The spin Hamiltonian then becomes

x

+ (gll cos e sin p + g , sin e cos p)S,J} +

= p H o { ( g l cos l

e cos p

- g, sin e sin p)s,!

( D / 2 ) { [ S z t 2- l/&S

S,)(S+/

+ 4

(35) M. E. Rose, “Elementary Theory of Angular Momentum,” Wiley, New York, N . Y . , 1957, p 65.

+ l)] x

+

p’ -

A , sin p’ cos p’)[(S+t

+ S-t)I,t]

by making the usual substitution of raising and lowering operators for x and y operators. One additional constraint we have applied is that the coefficient of the term in S,tZ,t should be zero, as previously mentioned. This condition leads t o a relationship between p and p‘, namely A tan p‘ = B tan p, but no general expression is available to relate 0 to p or 0’. The spin Hamiltonian derived in this way is almost of the same form as that found when D