Mercury stable isotopes reveal influence of foraging depth on mercury

8 hours ago - A systematic decrease in prey δ202Hg and Δ199Hg with increasing depth of occurrence and discrete isotopic signatures of epipelagic pre...
1 downloads 4 Views 801KB Size
Subscriber access provided by UNIV OF DURHAM

Environmental Processes

Mercury stable isotopes reveal influence of foraging depth on mercury concentrations and growth in Pacific bluefin tuna Daniel James Madigan, Miling Li, Runsheng Yin, Hannes Baumann, Owyn E Snodgrass, Heidi Dewar, David P. Krabbenhoft, Zofia Baumann, Nicholas S. Fisher, Prentiss H. Balcom, and Elsie M. Sunderland Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b06429 • Publication Date (Web): 15 May 2018 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on May 15, 2018

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 31

Environmental Science & Technology

213x110mm (150 x 150 DPI)

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32

Mercury stable isotopes reveal influence of foraging depth on mercury concentrations and growth in Pacific bluefin tuna Daniel J. Madigan*,1,†‡, Miling Li1,†, Yin Runsheng2,3, Hannes Baumann4, Owyn E. Snodgrass5, Heidi Dewar6, David P. Krabbenhoft3, Zofia Baumann4, Nicholas S. Fisher7, Prentiss Balcom1, Elsie M. Sunderland1,8

Affiliations: 1

Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Science, Cambridge, MA USA

2

State Key Laboratory of Ore Deposit Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guiyang 550002, China

3

U.S. Geological Survey, Middleton, WI USA Department of Marine Sciences, University of Connecticut, Groton, CT USA 5 Ocean Associates, Southwest Fisheries Science Center, NMFS, NOAA, La Jolla, California 92037, United States 6 Fisheries Resources Division, Southwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), La Jolla, California 92037, United States 7 School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY USA 8 Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA USA 4



These authors contributed equally to this work



Now at: Gulf of California International Research Center, Santa Rosalía, BCS, Mexico

*[email protected] +1 (516) 680-6470

1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 2 of 31

Page 3 of 31

Environmental Science & Technology

33

ABSTRACT

34

Pelagic ecosystems are changing due to environmental and anthropogenic forces, with uncertain

35

consequences for the ocean’s top predators. Epipelagic and mesopelagic prey resources differ in

36

quality and quantity, but their relative contribution to predator diets has been difficult to track.

37

We measured mercury (Hg) stable isotopes in young (1 year residency in the EPO to recent migration

102

from the WPO29, 30, 32. Thus, PBFT were selected from a narrow size range, and focused on small

103

individuals (66.3 to 76.0 cm FL) to minimize differences in migratory histories. Selection of

104

these small fish, combined with information of migratory histories from otolith

105

microchemistry35, allowed for some minimization of the confounding factor of varying migratory

106

histories, especially use of the EPO versus the WPO.

107

PBFT ages based on sagittal otolith analysis ranged from 328 – 498 days35, with an

108

estimated coefficient of variation of 5.7%. Individual PBFT weight could not be directly and

109

accurately determined from samples provided by fishermen due to variable treatment of fish

110

(blood removed, viscera removed, etc). Muscle samples (~20 g) were obtained from the dorsal

111

musculature ~2 cm below the skin. PBFT prey (Table S1) were collected directly in the field or

112

from predator stomach contents. All prey were identified to genus or species using

113

morphological characters. Prey from the WPO were collected from surface neuston tows, deep

114

Ocean Research Institute (ORIs), and Isaacs-Kidd Midwater Trawls (IKMTs) during two

115

research cruises in May and September 2013. Prey from the EPO were obtained both by trawl

116

net in July 2015 off central CA, USA and from stomach contents33. Muscle tissue was collected

5 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 6 of 31

Page 7 of 31

Environmental Science & Technology

117

from the dorsal musculature below the skin (fish), from the mantle (cephalopods), or from within

118

the carapace (crustaceans).

119 120

Hg concentration, prey energy density, and prey categorization.

121

All samples were freeze-dried and homogenized using a Wig-L-Bug tissue grinder prior

122

to any chemical analysis. The total Hg (THg) content of all PBFT and prey white muscle tissue

123

was measured using a Nippon MA-3000 direct thermal decomposition Hg analyzer. The average

124

recovery of the certified reference material (DORM-4) was 98.3 ± 6.1% SD (n = 4). Standard

125

solution and DORM-4 calibration checks were performed every ten samples to monitor stability

126

of the instrument. Samples were run in duplicate for every 10 samples, and overall variation of

127

duplicates was < 3%. Hg concentrations are reported in µg g-1 dw, and means as mean (µg g-1

128

dw) ± SD.

129

All samples with adequate mass were analyzed for MeHg. Lyophilized and powdered

130

samples were digested in 5N HNO3 at 60°C overnight and neutralized with 8 M KOH. MeHg

131

was measured using a Tekran 2700 Automated MeHg Analysis System following EPA 1630

132

method36. Recoveries of certified reference material DORM-4 (fish muscle) and TORT-3

133

(lobster hepatopancreas) were 86.4 ± 6.3% SD (n = 8). Variability among sample duplicates was

134

10.7 ± 4.8% (n = 9). For prey samples with inadequate tissue mass for MeHg analyses,

135

concentrations were estimated by using species-specific mean MeHg as a fraction of total Hg

136

(%) from the same species.

137

Mean energy density values (kJ g-1 ww) were obtained for each prey species analyzed for

138

Hg from a literature survey of species-specific values (Figure 1; Table S2). When available,

139

species- and basin-specific energy densities were chosen. For cephalopods, a mean energy

6 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

140

density from nine pelagic cephalopods in the EPO was used37. When unavailable for WPO fish

141

species, energy density of that species in the EPO was used. We also obtained peak abundance

142

and depth ranges for each species from the literature (Table S2).

143 144 145

Hg isotope analysis. Approximately 0.1 – 0.2 g of ground sample was digested (120°C, 6 hours) in a 4 mL

146

acid mixture (HCl:HNO3 = 1:3, v:v) for Hg isotope analysis, following previous studies25, 38, 39.

147

Four types of certified reference materials (TORT-2, TORT-3, DORM-2, DORM-4) and blanks

148

(n=5) were prepared in the same way as tissue samples. Based on measured total Hg

149

concentrations, the digest solutions were diluted to 0.3 – 1.0 ng mL-1, depending on the

150

availability of sample mass. A Neptune Plus multicollector inductively coupled plasma mass

151

spectrometer (MC-ICP-MS) housed at Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene was used to

152

measure Hg isotopes. Details of instrumentation setup, operation conditions, and analytical

153

methods are described in Yin et al.40 and Li et al.25. Total Hg in the diluted solutions was also

154

monitored by MC-ICP-MS using 202Hg signals, which yielded mean recoveries of 93±9.2% and

155

92±11% for fish samples (n=75) and certified reference materials (CRMs; n=10), respectively.

156

The sensitivity for 202Hg during Hg isotope analysis is estimated to be 1.0 – 1.2 V per ng mL-1

157

Hg. The signals for 202Hg were 103) and the ratio between ‘best draw’

190

posterior and total posterior density (