Mixed Starter Culture Regulate Biogenic Amines Formation via

Subscriber access provided by Kaohsiung Medical University

Food and Beverage Chemistry/Biochemistry

Mixed Starter Culture Regulate Biogenic Amines Formation via Decarboxylation and Transamination during Chinese Rice Wine Fermentation Xiaole Xia, Yi Luo, Qingwen Zhang, Yang Huang, and Bin Zhang J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b01134 • Publication Date (Web): 06 Jun 2018 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on June 6, 2018

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 32

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

1

Mixed Starter Culture Regulate Biogenic Amines Formation

2

via Decarboxylation and Transamination during Chinese

3

Rice Wine Fermentation

4

Xiaole Xia1, a, *, Yi Luo1, a, Qingwen Zhang1, Yang Huang1, Bin Zhang2

5

1

6

Biotechnology, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, 214122, P. R. China.

7

2

8

a

9

*

The Key Laboratory of Industrial Biotechnology, Ministry of Education, School of

Nantong Baipu Chinese Rice Wine Co., Ltd., Nantong, 226500, P. R. China.

These authors contributed equally to this work. Corresponding Author:

10

Xiaole Xia

11

E-mail: [email protected]

12

1

ACS Paragon Plus Environment


Page 2 of 32

ABSTRACT 13

Utilize amine-negative starter based on understanding of nitrogen metabolism is a

14

useful method for controlling biogenic amine (BA) in Chinese rice wine (CRW)

15

fermentation. The contribution of brewing materials to protein degradation was

16

analyzed, wheat Qu protein had no effect and yeast autolysis generated 10% amino

17

nitrogen. Milling degree of rice was strongly correlated with BAs formation (R2 = 0.99).

18

Subsequently, Lactobacillus plantarum and Staphylococcus xylosus were co-inoculated

19

as amine-negative starter at an optimized ratio of 1:2. Co-inoculation induced a

20

significant reduction in total BAs (43.7%, 44.5 mg L-1), putrescine (43.0%, 20.4 mg

21

L-1), tyramine (42.8%, 14.3 mg L-1), and histamine (42.6%, 3.5 mg L-1) content.

22

Notably, BAs degradation ability of Staphylococcus xylosus was stronger than the

23

suppression effect of Lactobacillus plantarum, and higher lactic acid bacteria (LAB)

24

amount has a positive correlation with lower BAs content. Overall, mixed strains

25

exerted a synergistic effect in lowering BAs accumulation via decarboxylation and

26

transamination.

27

KEYWORDS:

28

Staphylococcus xylosus, Lactobacillus plantarum, mixed starter

biogenic

amine,

Chinese

rice

wine,

nitrogen

metabolism,

29

2


Page 3 of 32


INTRODUCTION 30

Chinese Rice Wine (CRW) is one of the most popular alcoholic beverages in China on

31

account of its abundant amino acids, trace nutritional substance and low alcoholicity.1

32

CRW brewed via a typical open semi-solid-state fermentation process. Recently,

33

nitrogen metabolism hazards in CRW fermentation, including biogenic amine (BA) and

34

ethyl carbamate, have raised significant public concerns. Ethyl carbamate is a

35

carcinogenic compound resulting from the spontaneous reaction between urea and

36

ethanol and its formation in brewing process of CRW has been widely investigated.2-3

37

Among the nitrogenous compounds, BAs are synthesized through microbial

38

decarboxylation of precursor amino acids.4 The most common amines, histamine (HIS),

39

tyramine (TYR), tryptamine (TRY), phenethylamine (PHE) and cadaverine (CAD), are

40

generated from histidine, tyrosine, tryptophan, phenylalanine and lysine, respectively.5

41

Two independent pathways, via ornithine decarboxylase and agmatine deiminase, that

42

generate putrescine (PUT) have been identified to date.6-7 And spermidine (SPD) and

43

spermine (SPM) arise from putrescine that can mutually interconverted.8

44

Some types of BAs are undesirable in fermented products since they trigger

45

headaches, hypotension and digestive problems, especially in sensitive person.9 Among

46

the BAs identified, HIS and TYR, displaying the greatest toxicity, have been widely

47

studied. And malolactic fermentation was the main process to produce HIS and TYR in

48

winemaking process. Additionally, polyamines such as PUT and CAD, with lower

49

pharmacological activity, are reported to interact with amine oxidases to exacerbate the

50

side effects of HIS and TYR.10 The main BAs determined in CRW are PUT, CAD, HIS,

51

TYR, SPM and SPD.11 Héberger, Ket al. observed a significant association between

52

free amino acids and BAs concentration in wine.12 The concentration of BAs in wine 3



Page 4 of 32

53

vary from trace amounts up to 130 mg L-1.13 HPLC with a pre-column derivatization

54

was the most prevalent analytical technique for determining BAs. Recently, Xie and

55

co-workers reported that the amino acid composition in CRW is highly associated with

56

total protein content of raw material.14 Some aliphatic amines exist in wheat Qu

57

(saccharifying agent) and glutinous rice(< 2.88 mg kg-1).15 In many cases, the capacity

58

to produce BAs is related to nitrogen compounds and microbial decarboxylase

59

activity.16 To our knowledge, no detailed studies have been conducted on protein

60

metabolism and consequent effects on BAs formation during CRW fermentation

61

process.

62

At the beginning of CRW brewing, wheat Qu and Chinese koji (Aspergillus oryzae)

63

are added to provide abundant microorganisms in the fermentation mash. Lactic acid

64

bacteria (LAB) constitute the dominant BAs producers in CRW, similar to other

65

fermented products. In 2011, Zaman et al. detected Lactobacillus rhamnosus as the

66

main strain responsible for BAs formation in five wineries.17 Histamine is obtained by

67

decarboxylation of free histidine through Lactobacillus hilgardii and Pediodoccus

68

parvulus in wine.18 Production of tyramine was identified as a species-level trait of

69

Lacobacillus brevis IOEB9809 in wine.19 And Enterococcus faecalis was responsible

70

for putrescine biosynthesis.20 Several strategies have been established to control BAs

71

accumulation in food based on the mechanisms underlying the formation of these

72

compounds. Physical methods include cold treatment, hydrostatic pressure, irradiation

73

to inhibit its microbial activity, and destroy producer strain cells.21 However, microbial

74

growth is crucial to obtain fermented foods and these physical techniques may affect

75

the flavor and quality of the final product. Another approach to control BAs formation

76

is modulation of protein catabolism by utilizing specific starter culture that possessing

77

low decarboxylase and significant amine oxidase activities.22-23 Moreover, disruption 4


Page 5 of 32


78

of autochthonous microbiota may aid in reducing the occurrence of BAs producer

79

strains. Callejón et al. isolated Lactobacillus plantarum J16 and Pediococcus

80

acidilactici CECT 5930 possessing laccases and multicopper oxidases responsible for

81

amine degradation in wine.24 The use of Staphylococcus xylosus result in

82

amine-degradation, this was accompanied by producing aldehyde, hydrogen peroxide,

83

and ammonia via amine oxidase activity.25 Dehaut et al. demonstrated that inoculating

84

fermented anchovies with Staphylococcus xylosus reduced the total BAs content by

85

16%, especially in PUT, CAD, and TYR content.26 Mixed starter culture comprising

86

Lactobacillus plantarum and Saccharomyces cerevisiae drastically reduced the

87

accumulation of PUT and CAD level in fermented silver carp sausage, through their

88

rapid growth and antimicrobial activity.27 Make use of Lactobacillus spp. and

89

Staphylococcus spp. as starter culture in meat products has been widely investigated.

90

However, little information is available on microbial interference to obtain CRW of low

91

BA yield, especially with regard to effects on nitrogen metabolism and interactions

92

between the starter and microbial community.

93

The development of effective control strategies requires clarification of the BAs

94

formation mechanisms. Therefore, identification of the protein sources and

95

microorganisms involved in BAs production is necessary for enhancing food safety of

96

fermented products. In this study, we evaluated the relationship between BAs formation

97

and protein metabolic pathways, and the origin of nitrogen in raw materials employed

98

for brewing CRW. Fermentation mash was co-inoculated with S. xylosus

99

(CGMCC1.8382) and L. plantarum (ACBC271), which with a view to limiting

100

decarboxylation and fortifying transamination, as well as inhibiting the growth of

101

indigenous producer strains, and consequently, controlling BAs formation. The overall

102

mechanism underlying BAs production and the effect of co-inoculation with the two 5



103

Page 6 of 32

strains on regulating BAs during fermentation were discussed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS 104

Brewing and Sampling of Chinese Rice Wine

105

The brewing procedure of CRW was performed as described previously.28 Samples

106

were collected from the top, center, bottom part of fermented mash for each

107

fermentation stage in triplicate, and stored at 4 °C after filtration. The liquid samples

108

were used for preparation of derivatization prior to HPLC.

109

BAs determination

110

Quantitative assay of BAs was performed via reversed-phase HPLC (RP-HPLC),

111

eluted compounds were determined by a diode array spectrophotometer (Hitachi, Japan)

112

and measuring absorbance at 254 nm.29 5 mL of sample was homogenized with 15 mL

113

of hydrochloric acid (0.1 M). After centrifuging at 6000g (10 min, 4 °C), the

114

supernatant was collected and diluted with hydrochloric acid (0.1 M) to 25 mL, stored

115

at 4 °C for analysis. A 2 mL aliquot of the extract was supplemented with 0.2 mL of 1,

116

7-diaminoheptane (100 mg L-1 in 0.1 M hydrochloric acid) as an internal standard, then

117

mixture was derivatized with 2 mL of dansyl chloride at 45 °C for 1 h before analysis.

118

The mobile phase consisted of A (acetonitrile) and B (water) at flow rate of 0.8 mL

119

min-1. The gradient elution program as described by Annalisa Tassoni et al.,30 and with

120

some modification as follows, 55% A at 5min, 65% A at 10min, 70% A at 20 min, 90%

121

A at 27 min, 100% A at 30 min and 55% A at 35 min. Chromatography was performed

122

at 30 °C and injection volume was 20 µL.

6


Page 7 of 32


123

Enumeration of microorganisms and detection of physico-chemical properties

124

For microbiological enumeration, the number of viable LAB and yeast cells were

125

determined as colony-forming units (CFU mL−1), samples were serially diluted 10-fold

126

with sterile saline (0.85% NaCl) then spread 0.1 mL of each dilution on agar plates.

127

LAB strains were routinely incubated on MRS (de Man-Rogosa–Sharp, Oxoid, Milan,

128

Italy) medium at 37 °C for 24 h under anaerobic conditions. The pH of medium was

129

adjusted to 5.8 with NaOH before sterilization for 15 min at 121 °C. Yeast was cultured

130

on 3M count plates (MN, United States) at 25 °C for 68 h under aerobic conditions.

131

Protein content was determined by the method described by Lowry et al.31 The

132

analysis of starch was performed according to the method of Frei, M. et al.32

133

Physico-chemical parameters (amino nitrogen, total sugar, acid, alcohol, and amino

134

acid content) of fermentation mash were measured according to the National Standard

135

of the People’s Republic of China of CRW.33

136

Investigation of protein metabolism of wheat Qu, yeast autolysis and different

137

levels of milled rice

138

We investigated the contribution to protein metabolism of wheat Qu by determining

139

protein and amino nitrogen content during fermentation. Fermentation was conducted

140

with wheat Qu as control group, another fermentation group used enzyme (amylase,

141

glucoamylase and protease, each 10 U g-1) to replace wheat Qu, and group 3 employed

142

enzyme (amylase, glucoamylase and protease, each 10 U g-1) plus inactivated wheat Qu.

143

Amylase (thermostable alpha-amylase, from Bacillus licheniformis), glucoamylase

144

(1,4-alpha-D-glucan glucohydrolase, from Aspergillus niger) and protease (Acid

145

protease, from Aspergillus oryzae) were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. 7



146

Page 8 of 32

Louis, MO, U.S.A.).

147

To determine the effect of yeast autolysis on nitrogen metabolism, Chinese rice

148

wine-like medium was inoculated with yeast cells. Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Angle,

149

China) was inoculated in sodium lactate buffer (50 mmol L-1, pH 4.2, 13% v/v) and

150

incubated at 30 °C for 7 days, the yeast cells were collected after centrifuging and

151

washing three times with sterilized water. Rice was steamed after soaking, followed

152

with saccharification by amylase (10 U g-1) at 85 °C for 0.5 h and with glucoamylase

153

(10 U g-1) at 60 °C for 4 h. Then filtered and diluted to 13 ° Bx with water which pH

154

value was adjusted to 4.2 ± 0.1 with lactic acid, and autoclaved at 121 °C for 15 min.

155

The sterilized mixture as Chinese rice wine-like medium, which was inoculated with

156

collected yeast cells and incubated at 15 °C for 21 days. Amino nitrogen content and

157

yeast count were determined every 3 days.

158

Brown rice was polished to different milling degrees of rice (100%, brown rice, A;

159

91%, B; 87%, C; 82%, D), and subjected to CRW fermentation. The milling degree was

160

calculated by using the following expression, which is an important indicator of rice

161

quality.

Milling degree (%) =

weight of milled rice *100 weight of brown rice

162

The physico-chemical parameters of different milled rice are shown in Table 1. Total

163

sugar, ethanol, amino nitrogen and yeast count were evaluated during fermentation

164

process.

165

Table 1

8


Page 9 of 32


166

Identification of the ability of Lactobacillus plantarum (ACBC271) and

167

Staphylococcus xylosus (CGMCC1.8382) to control BAs formation

168

Low BAs-producing capability of Lactobacillus plantarum (ACBC271) was assessed

169

in MRS broth, compared with Lactobacillus sp.30a (ATCC33222) which is able to

170

produce HIS, PUT and CAD. MRS broth supplemented with 100 mg L-1 of each

171

precursor amino acid (histidine, tyrosine, tryptophan, phenylalanine, lysine, arginine,

172

and ornithine). The ability of BAs degradation by Staphylococcus xylosus

173

(CGMCC1.8382) grown on Mannitol Salt Agar (MSA) broth, which supplemented

174

with 100 mg L-1 of each amine (histamine, tyramine, tryptamine, phenethylamine,

175

cadaverine, putrescine, spermidine and spermine). BAs concentration were examined

176

to evaluate the control ability of the microorganism. After incubation at 37 °C for 48 h,

177

samples were derivatized and analyzed by HPLC. The standard amino acids and BAs

178

were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, U.S.A.).

179

CRW fermentation with amine-negative starter culture

180

Lactobacillus plantarum (ACBC271) and Staphylococcus xylosus (CGMCC1.8382)

181

were prepared in MRS and MSA medium, respectively. Culture was conducted at 37 °C

182

for 24 h prior to fermentation. Strains were inoculated into CRW fermentation with the

183

initial cell density of 3.5 × 107 CFU mL-1. A non-inoculated sample of CRW

184

fermentation was prepared as the control. Additionally, single-strain fermentation with

185

L. plantarum (ACBC271) or S. xylosus (CGMCC1.8382) was conducted, respectively.

186

Mixed strains were co-inoculated at ratios of 1:1and 1:2 to determine the relative

187

amounts of strains for optimal fermentation. Samples of 10 mL were collected at

188

different time and subjected to the analysis of BAs and other parameters. 9



Page 10 of 32

189

Data Analysis

190

All experiments were performed in triplicate and presented as the mean with standard

191

deviation (mean ± SD) for parallel samples. Pearson’s correlation and t tests were

192

performed using Origins 8.0 (Origin Pro, MA, United States). A one-way analysis of

193

variance (ANOVA) test was applied by SPSS statistical software version 12.0 (SPSS

194

Inc., Chicago, IL, United States), which P value was < 0.01. Multiple linear regression

195

using principal component analysis (PCA) was conducted to identify possible patterns

196

and outliers between samples.

RESULTS 197

Contributions of wheat Qu and yeast autolysis to nitrogen metabolism

198

BAs are mainly formed by decarboxylation of the corresponding precursor amino acids.

199

While several reports have documented the effects of related microorganisms, few

200

investigations have focused on the role of protein metabolism.34-35 Except rice, wheat

201

Qu and yeast autolysis possess protein that may contribute to BAs formation in CRW

202

fermentation. To determine the specific contributions of these proteins (other than rice

203

protein) to amino nitrogen and BAs formation, the landscape of protein metabolism

204

during fermentation requires clarification. Protein and amino nitrogen content were

205

monitored in different wheat Qu containing fermentation samples (Figure 1), which

206

showing a homologous trend in all three groups. The protein content (0.08 g L-1) in

207

control group was lower than that in other groups, and amino nitrogen content (0.46 g

208

L-1) was the highest at the end of fermentation. This finding may be explained that

209

normal fermentation mash possesses abundant microorganisms with high protease

210

activity, which convert protein into amino nitrogen through nitrogen metabolism. 10


Page 11 of 32


211

Interestingly, the amino nitrogen contents of Groups 2 and 3 were nearly equivalent

212

with the concentration of 0.23 and 0.24 g L-1, respectively, indicating that proteins of

213

wheat Qu have no influence on nitrogen metabolism during CRW fermentation. In the

214

later stages of brewing, high protein content with a slow degradation rate was observed,

215

suggesting that microbial activity is a crucial factor for nitrogen metabolism in CRW.

216

Figure 1

217

Yeast autolysis releases peptides and amino acids that affect BAs formation in

218

sparkling wines.36-37 To investigate the contribution of yeast autolysis to nitrogen

219

metabolism, Saccharomyces cerevisiae was inoculated into CRW-like medium.

220

Changes and correlations of yeast and amino nitrogen patterns are presented in Figure 2.

221

The amino nitrogen concentration increased to 0.047 g L-1 at day 15 and yeast count

222

decreased progressively from 4.9 × 109 CFU mL−1 to 7 × 106 CFU mL−1. Furthermore,

223

the amino nitrogen content (0.049 g L−1) from yeast autolysis accounted for 10% of

224

total amino nitrogen, and a positive correlation (R2 = 0.94) existed between yeast and

225

amino nitrogen.

226

Figure 2

227

Influence of rice protein on protein metabolism and BAs formation during CRW

228

fermentation

229

Rice is raw material of CRW fermentation, which provide protein substrate of

230

microbial growth. The milling degree is an indicative of the overall protein content.

231

We conducted fermentation using four levels of rice with different milling degree to

232

investigate the metabolism of rice proteins. To better confirm that the influence of

233

milling degree on BAs formation, all the data on parameters (ethanol, total sugar,

234

milling rate, amino nitrogen, starch, protein, and yeast) and total BAs, were used to 11



Page 12 of 32

235

perform a principal component analysis (PCA) as shown in figure 3A, indicating that

236

significantly different under the 4 levels of milling degree (100%, 91%, 87% and 82%)

237

examined. As a result, two PCs accounted for 96.48% (PC1, 58.97%; PC2, 37.51%),

238

brown rice and milled rice clearly separated into two distinct groups. Ethanol, amino

239

nitrogen (AN) and yeast count appeared to be positively correlated with BAs. At the

240

end of fermentation, the range of ethanol is 8.9-13.2% v/v, and corresponding total

241

BAs concentration increased from 41.7 to 82.5 mg L-1. The correlation of ethanol with

242

BA was presented in Figure 3B (R2 = 0.99), this suggests that a stressful environment

243

containing high ethanol content may thus promote decarboxylation reactions to a

244

certain extent, which might be due to amine formation as a protective mechanism of

245

microorganisms against unfavorable growth conditions which is consistent with

246

previous report.38

247

Particularly, the group of fermentation with brown rice (group A) show a low

248

ethanol (8.9% v/v) and low total sugar content (21 g L-1) at the end of fermentation.

249

That might attribute to the rice protein was enveloped by rice bran. Therefore, PCA

250

performed on 8 variables (ethanol, total sugar, BAs, milling degree, amino nitrogen,

251

starch, protein, and yeast) except for group A, as shown in Figure 3C. This suggests

252

that milling degree was positively correlated with BAs other than brown rice, and

253

linear regression analysis revealed an R2 value of 0.99 (Figure 3D). The presence of

254

BAs depend on the activities of at least two protein types, including (1) those involved

255

in proteolysis into peptides, which further convert into precursor amino acids, (2)

256

those enzymes responsible for decarboxylation of precursor amino acids.39 Therefore,

257

considering the ethanol, amino nitrogen content and sugar utilization rates, the

258

appropriate milling degree of 87-91% is a good choice for CRW fermentation. 12


Page 13 of 32


259

Figure 3

260

Accumulation of BAs results from decarboxylation of specific precursor amino

261

acids, which was strongly associated with protein metabolism of rice used for CRW. A

262

close correlation between precursor amino acids and eight BAs during CRW

263

fermentation was confirmed (R2 > 0.80), it is consistent with previous reports.11, 28

264

Changes in amino acid content and BAs formation rate during CRW fermentation are

265

shown in Figure 4. A significant increase of amino acids was observed at every stage.

266

However, the high content of free amino acid did not generate homologous BAs

267

formation rate. Especially at the end of fermentation, the amino acid concentration was

268

3.2 g L-1 while the corresponding BAs formation rate of 0.55 mg L-1 d-1. This difference

269

might attribute to a part of free amino acids is involved in catalytic actions,

270

microorganism levels were in the stable or declining phase, which lead to weaker

271

activity of BAs generating enzymes. Indicating that BAs formation during CRW

272

fermentation is dominated by microorganism activity. Hence, the use of an

273

amine-negative starter appears to present a promising means to diminish BAs

274

concentrations in CRW.

275

Figure 4

276

Ability of L. plantarum (ACBC271) and S. xylosus (CGMCC1.8382) to control

277

BAs

278

Utilization of amine-negative starter to control the accumulation of BAs is broadly

279

applied in fermented foods owing to high security and low interference with

280

technological process. To verify the low BAs producing ability of L. plantarum

281

(ACBC271) and degradation ability of S. xylosus (CGMCC1.8382) in medium. MRS

282

broth was supplemented with seven precursor amino acids (each 100 mg L-1) for 13



Page 14 of 32

283

growth of L. plantarum. Low BAs producing activity was compared to BAs producer

284

strain Lactobacillus sp.30a (ATCC33222). MSA with eight BAs (each 100 mg L-1) was

285

used for evaluating degradation ability of S. xylosus (CGMCC1.8382). BAs content

286

was detected after incubating for 48 h, as presented in Table 2. BAs formation during

287

fermentation in L. plantarum (ACBC271) culture was less 58.91% than producer strain,

288

and S. xylosus (CGMCC1.8382) showing a degradation percentage of 31.45% of total

289

BAs. This result could be attributed to the lower decarboxylase activity of L. plantarum

290

(ACBC271) and amine-oxidase of S. xylosus (CGMCC1.8382). Based on these

291

findings, L. plantarum (ACBC271) and S. xylosus (CGMCC1.8382) were utilized as

292

starter culture for further characterization.

293

Table 2

294

Influence of mixed starter on BAs accumulation during Chinese rice wine

295

fermentation

296

To our knowledge, no studies on optimizing starter culture to reduce BAs accumulation

297

during CRW fermentation has been conducted. In current investigation, fermentation

298

mash was co-inoculated with L. plantarum (ACBC271) and S. xylosus

299

(CGMCC1.8382), and the ability to reduce BAs accumulation was analyzed as shown

300

in Figure 5. At the end of fermentation, control, single inoculation of L. plantarum

301

(ACBC271) or S. xylosus (CGMCC1.8382) and co-inoculation samples contained total

302

BAs level of 79.1 mg L-1, 70.3 mg L-1, 61.7 mg L-1 and 58.2 mg L-1, respectively

303

(Figure 5A). Compared with control group, reduction of total BAs was 11.1% in the L.

304

plantarum (ACBC271) and 22.0% in the S. xylosus (CGMCC1.8382) inoculation

305

groups. Indicating that the inhibitory effect of degradation is stronger than low

306

production efficiency. Moreover, an increased capability to diminish total BAs was 14


Page 15 of 32


307

observed, which with 25.5% reduction in mixed strains fermentation. Linear

308

regression analysis was performed on BA (excluding day 4) as shown in Figure 5B.

309

Overall, the slope of co-inoculation was the lowest at 0.96, suggesting that BAs

310

formation rate was the slowest. The two strains thus appear to exhibit a synergistic

311

suppressive effect on BAs accumulation. The BAs formation rate in co-inoculation

312

group was lower than those of other groups at every stage (Figure 5C), which might

313

be attribute not only to the degradation activity of S. xylosus (CGMCC1.8382) and low

314

decarboxylation effect of L. plantarum (ACBC271) but also to the competition effect

315

with endogenous bacteria, particularly those with amino acid decarboxylase activity.

316

Our findings support the effective application of mixed starter culture with degradation

317

activity and low decarboxylase in reducing BAs accumulation during CRW

318

fermentation.

319

Figure 5

320

L. plantarum (ACBC271) and S. xylosus (CGMCC1.8382) exhibited a synergistic

321

effect in reducing BAs formation. Since the suppressive effect of S. xylosus

322

(CGMCC1.8382) was stronger than that of L. plantarum (ACBC271), mixed culture

323

fermentation was conducted with ratio of 1:2 (L. plantarum (ACBC271) to S. xylosus

324

(CGMCC1.8382)). Compared with non-inoculated group, the BAs level was reduced to

325

25.5% and 43.0% at co-inoculation ratios of 1:1 and 1:2, respectively (Figure 6A).

326

These results indicated that the higher efficiency of BAs suppression at a co-inoculation

327

ratio of 1:2, which might due to amine oxidation of S. xylosus (CGMCC1.8382). As

328

shown in Figure 6B, piecewise linear regression analysis was performed, which divided

329

the whole process into main fermentation and post-fermentation stages. In main

330

fermentation stage, the slopes of these two groups were 2.03 (LP+SX, 1:1) and 1.44

331

(LP+SX, 1:2), respectively. At the post-fermentation stage, two groups displayed 15



Page 16 of 32

332

approximate slopes of 0.35 (LP+SX, 1:1) and 0.40 (LP+SX, 1:2), suggesting that

333

regulation on BAs was mainly happen in main fermentation stage.

334

Figure 6

DISCUSSION 335

The potential toxicity of BAs has been a subject of increasing research focus. The main

336

factor contributing to the presence of BAs is decarboxylation of precursor amino

337

acids.13 The influence of raw materials in fermentation mash on nitrogen metabolism

338

remains ambiguous. This work suggested that proteins of raw materials other than rice

339

had no significant influence on BAs formation, while microorganisms of wheat Qu are

340

an important contributory factor to nitrogen metabolism. Numerous studies to date have

341

focused on controlling BAs generation in fermented food. However, the utility of

342

physical methods is restricted, owing to demanding microbial growth conditions.

343

Capozzi et al. reported that BAs reduction is species- and strain-dependent, and

344

inoculation with amine-negative starter culture is an effective method to control BAs

345

generation.40 In this study, the fermentation mash was co-inoculated with L. plantarum

346

(ACBC271) and S. xylosus (CGMCC1.8382), with the aim to control BAs

347

accumulation during CRW brewing. Our findings indicated that the mixed strains

348

evoke low content of BAs through cooperative suppression of decarboxylation and

349

fortification of transamination activities. The S. xylosus (CGMCC1.8382) harbors

350

amine oxidase and L. plantarum (ACBC271) possesses low decarboxylase activity,

351

leading to low BAs yield. In addition, S. xylosus exhibited high antimicrobial activity

352

and competed with natural (endogenous) amine-producing microbiota of mash to

353

interfere with decarboxylation that metabolize precursor substrates into BAs.41

354

Generally, formation of BAs in CRW can be controlled by using appropriate raw 16


Page 17 of 32


355

materials, strict manufacturing environments and the inhibition of detrimental

356

microorganisms.

357

Although we confirmed prominent reduction of BAs using mixed starter culture,

358

the landscape of individual strains was not clear over all the fermentation stages. LAB

359

counts, ethanol, total acid content and their association with BAs production were

360

evaluated, as shown in Figure 7. The results showed similar changes of LAB, ethanol

361

and total acid levels. At the end of fermentation, the level of LAB in co-inoculation and

362

L. plantarum (ACBC271) inoculation groups were significantly higher than those of

363

control and S. xylosus (CGMCC1.8382) inoculation groups. All BAs showed similar

364

trends during fermentation, the concentration of individual BAs at the end of

365

fermentation were shown in Figure 7B. Compared with control group, PUT displayed

366

the highest content, followed by TYR and HIS, and the level of these three main BAs

367

was significantly decreased by > 42% in co-inoculation (LP+SX, 1:2) group. PCA was

368

performed on 7 variables (LAB, ethanol, total acid, BAs, PUT, TYR, HIS) in mixed

369

starter culture group (LP+SX, 1:2) as shown in Figure 7C. The first two PCs accounted

370

for 98.73% (93.90% PC1 and 4.83% PC2). LAB was negatively correlated with BAs,

371

i.e., higher LAB amount was associated with lower BAs content, similar to PUT, TYR,

372

and HIS. This suggests that the characteristic low decarboxylase activity of L.

373

plantarum (ACBC271) leads to diminished BAs production.

374

Figure 7

375

In natural and inoculated microbial communities within CRW fermentation system,

376

diverse microbial strains coexist and interact each other, which induce variations in

377

functions and specific microbial structures. Suppression of BAs was cooperatively

378

ascribed to amine oxidase activity of S. xylosus (CGMCC1.8382) and low amino acid

379

decarboxylase activity of L. plantarum (ACBC271), especially for HIS, PUT and TYR. 17



Page 18 of 32

380

BAs production ability is reported to be both species- and strain-dependent.42 Inhibition

381

of other strains and regulation of the relevant enzymes are complex dynamic processes.

382

Further elucidation of metabolic pathways is required in conjunction with species

383

identification to deep insight into the interactions among microbial community at the

384

molecular level, high-throughput DNA sequencing analyses are ongoing to explore the

385

microbial landscape during mixed strains fermentation. Additionally, Lactobacillus

386

plantarumcan produce diketone, diacetyl, 4-vinylphenol which are specific flavor

387

metabolites in wine.43 Staphylococcus xylosus also can promote polyphenol formation

388

in winemaking.44 Further research is underway to explore the species at molecular level

389

to reveal details of interactions and establish the effects of S. xylosus (CGMCC1.8382)

390

and L. plantarum (ACBC271) on flavor profiles.

391

Supporting Information

392

Scheme S1. The conversion pathways of amino acids and biogenic amines.

393

Scheme S2. The fermentation and sampling processes of Chinese rice wine.

394

Corresponding Author

395

Xiaole Xia,

396

E-mail: [email protected], Phone: 008651085326829

397

Funding

398

This work was supported by grant from National Key Research and Development Plan

399

(2017YFC1600401), The Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

400

(JUSRP51734B), The Key Research and Development Program of Jiangsu Province

401

(BE 2016331), The 111 Project (No. 111-2-06).

18


Page 19 of 32


402

Notes

403

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

404

19



Page 20 of 32

REFERENCES 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459

1. Que, F.; Mao, L.; Pan, X. Antioxidant activities of five Chinese rice wines and the involvement of phenolic compounds. Food Res. Int. 2006, 39, 581-587. 2. Wu, H.; Chen, L.; Pan, G.; Tu, C.; Zhou, X.; Mo, L. Study on the changing concentration of ethyl carbamate in yellow rice wine during production and storage by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2012, 235, 779-782. 3. Wu, D.; Li, X.; Shen, C.; Lu, J.; Chen, J.; Xie, G. Decreased ethyl carbamate generation during Chinese rice wine fermentation by disruption of CAR1 in an industrial yeast strain. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2014, 180, 19-23. 4. Santos, M. S. Biogenic amines: their importance in foods. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1996, 29, 213-231. 5. Önal, A. A review: Current analytical methods for the determination of biogenic amines in foods. Food Chem. 2007, 103, 1475-1486. 6. Lucas, P. M.; Blancato, V. S.; Claisse, O.; Magni, C.; Lolkema, J. S.; Lonvaud-Funel, A. Agmatine deiminase pathway genes in Lactobacillus brevis are linked to the tyrosine decarboxylation operon in a putative acid resistance locus. Microbiology 2007, 153, 2221-30. 7. Coton, M.; Romano, A.; Spano, G.; Ziegler, K.; Vetrana, C.; Desmarais, C.; Lonvaud-Funel, A.; Lucas, P.; Coton, E. Occurrence of biogenic amine-forming lactic acid bacteria in wine and cider. Food Microbiol. 2010, 27, 1078-85. 8. Nannelli, F.; Claisse, O.; Gindreau, E.; de Revel, G.; Lonvaud-Funel, A.; Lucas, P. M. Determination of lactic acid bacteria producing biogenic amines in wine by quantitative PCR methods. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2008, 47, 594-9. 9. Shalaby, A. R. Significance of biogenic amines to food safety and human health. Food Res. Int. 1996, 29, 675-690. 10. Kim, M.-K.; Mah, J.-H.; Hwang, H.-J. Biogenic amine formation and bacterial contribution in fish, squid and shellfish. Food Chem. 2009, 116, 87-95. 11. Yongmei, L.; Xin, L.; Xiaohong, C.; Mei, J.; Chao, L.; Mingsheng, D. A survey of biogenic amines in Chinese rice wines. Food Chem. 2007, 100, 1424-1428. 12. Héberger, K.; Csomós, E.; Simon-Sarkadi, L. Principal component and linear discriminant analyses of free amino acids and biogenic amines in Hungarian wines. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 8055-8060. 13. Ancin-Azpilicueta, C.; Gonzalez-Marco, A.; Jimenez-Moreno, N. Current knowledge about the presence of amines in wine. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2008, 48, 257-75. 14. Xie, G.-F.; Yang, D.-D.; Liu, X.-Q.; Cheng, X.-X.; Rui, H.-F.; Zhou, H.-J. Correlation between the amino acid content in rice wine and protein content in glutinous rice. J I Brewing. 2016, 122, 162-167. 15. Zhang, F.; Xue, J.; Wang, D.; Wang, Y.; Zou, H.; Zhu, B. Dynamic changes of the content of biogenic amines in Chinese rice wine during the brewing process. J I Brewing. 2013, 119, 294-302. 16. Spano, G.; Beneduce, L.; de Palma, L.; Quinto, M.; Vernile, A.; Massa, S. Characterization of wine Lactobacillus plantarum by PCR-DGGE and RAPD-PCR analysis and identification of Lactobacillus plantarum strains able to degrade arginine. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2006, 22, 769-773. 17. Zaman, M. Z.; Abu Bakar, F.; Jinap, S.; Bakar, J. Novel starter cultures to inhibit biogenic amines accumulation during fish sauce fermentation. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2011, 145, 84-91. 18. Landete, J. M.; Ferrer, S.; Pardo, I. Which lactic acid bacteria are responsible for histamine production in wine? J. Appl. Microbiol. 2005, 99, 580-6. 19. Moreno-Arribas, V.; Lonvaud-Funel, A. Purification and characterization of tyrosine decarboxylase of Lactobacillus brevis IOEB 9809 isolated from wine. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2001, 195, 103-107. 20. Ladero, V.; Fernandez, M.; Calles-Enriquez, M.; Sanchez-Llana, E.; Canedo, E.; Martin, M. C.; Alvarez, M. A. Is the production of the biogenic amines tyramine and putrescine a species-level trait in enterococci? Food Microbiol. 2012, 30, 132-8. 21. Naila, A.; Flint, S.; Fletcher, G.; Bremer, P.; Meerdink, G. Control of biogenic amines in food--existing and emerging approaches. J. Food Sci. 2010, 75, R139-50. 22. Cueva, C.; Garcia-Ruiz, A.; Gonzalez-Rompinelli, E.; Bartolome, B.; Martin-Alvarez, P. J.; Salazar, O.; Vicente, M. F.; Bills, G. F.; Moreno-Arribas, M. V. Degradation of biogenic amines by vineyard ecosystem fungi. Potential use in winemaking. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2012, 112, 672-82. 23. González-Fernández, C.; Santos, E.; Jaime, I.; Rovira, J. Influence of starter cultures and sugar 20


Page 21 of 32


460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517

concentrations on biogenic amine contents in chorizo dry sausage. Food Microbiol. 2003, 20, 275-284. 24. Callejon, S.; Sendra, R.; Ferrer, S.; Pardo, I. Identification of a novel enzymatic activity from lactic acid bacteria able to degrade biogenic amines in wine. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 98, 185-98. 25. Beck, H. C.; Hansen, A. M.; Lauritsen, F. R. Metabolite production and kinetics of branched-chain aldehyde oxidation in Staphylococcus xylosus. Enzyme & Microbial Technology 2002, 31, 94-101. 26. Dehaut, A.; Himber, C.; Mulak, V.; Grard, T.; Krzewinski, F.; Le Fur, B.; Duflos, G. Evolution of volatile compounds and biogenic amines throughout the shelf life of marinated and salted anchovies (Engraulis encrasicolus). J. Agric. Food. Chem. 2014, 62, 8014-22. 27. Nie, X.; Zhang, Q.; Lin, S. Biogenic amine accumulation in silver carp sausage inoculated with Lactobacillus plantarum plus Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Food Chem. 2014, 153, 432-6. 28. Xia, X.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, B.; Zhang, W.; Wang, W. Insights into the Biogenic Amine Metabolic Landscape during Industrial Semidry Chinese Rice Wine Fermentation. J. Agric. Food. Chem. 2016, 64, 7385-7393. 29. Soufleros, E. H.; Bouloumpasi, E.; Zotou, A.; Loukou, Z. Determination of biogenic amines in Greek wines by HPLC and ultraviolet detection after dansylation and examination of factors affecting their presence and concentration. Food Chem. 2007, 101, 704-716. 30. Tassoni, A.; Tango, N.; Ferri, M. Comparison of biogenic amine and polyphenol profiles of grape berries and wines obtained following conventional, organic and biodynamic agricultural and oenological practices. Food Chem. 2013, 139, 405-13. 31. Lowry, O. H.; Rosebrough, N. J.; Farr, A. L.; Randall, R. J. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J. Biol. Chem. 1951, 193, 265-275. 32. Frei, M.; Siddhuraju, P.; Becker, K. Studies on the in vitro starch digestibility and the glycemic index of six different indigenous rice cultivars from the Philippines. Food Chem. 2003, 83, 395-402. 33. Gereral Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China & Standardization Administration of the People's republic of China: China, 2008. GB 13662-2008. 34. Flasarova, R.; Pachlova, V.; Bunkova, L.; Mensikova, A.; Georgova, N.; Drab, V.; Bunka, F. Biogenic amine production by Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris strains in the model system of Dutch-type cheese. Food Chem. 2016, 194, 68-75. 35. Henríquez-Aedo, K.; Durán, D.; Garcia, A.; Hengst, M. B.; Aranda, M. Identification of biogenic amines-producing lactic acid bacteria isolated from spontaneous malolactic fermentation of chilean red wines. LWT - Food Sci and Technol. 2016, 68, 183-189. 36. Kemp, B.; Alexandre, H.; Robillard, B.; Marchal, R. Effect of production phase on bottle-fermented sparkling wine quality. J. Agric. Food. Chem. 2015, 63, 19-38. 37. Perpetuini, G.; Di Gianvito, P.; Arfelli, G.; Schirone, M.; Corsetti, A.; Tofalo, R.; Suzzi, G. Biodiversity of autolytic ability in flocculent Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains suitable for traditional sparkling wine fermentation. Yeast 2016, 33, 303-12. 38. Mazzoli, R.; Lamberti, C.; Coisson, J. D.; Purrotti, M.; Arlorio, M.; Giuffrida, M. G.; Giunta, C.; Pessione, E. Influence of ethanol, malate and arginine on histamine production of Lactobacillus hilgardii isolated from an Italian red wine. Amino Acids 2009, 36, 81-9. 39. Linares, D. M.; Martin, M. C.; Ladero, V.; Alvarez, M. A.; Fernandez, M. Biogenic amines in dairy products. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2011, 51, 691-703. 40. Capozzi, V.; Russo, P.; Ladero, V.; Fernandez, M.; Fiocco, D.; Alvarez, M. A.; Grieco, F.; Spano, G. Biogenic Amines Degradation by Lactobacillus plantarum: Toward a Potential Application in Wine. Front Microbiol 2012, 3, 122. 41. Papamanoli, E.; Kotzekidou, P.; Tzanetakis, N.; Litopoulou-Tzanetaki, E. Characterization of Micrococcaceae isolated from dry fermented sausage. Food Microbiol. 2002, 19, 441-449. 42. Russo, P.; Spano, G.; Arena, M.; Capozzi, V.; Grieco, F.; Beneduce, L. Are consumers aware of the risks related to biogenic amines in food. Curr Res. Technol. Edu. Top. Appl. Microbiol. Microb. Biotechnol 2010, 1087-1095. 43. Pozo-Bayón, M. A.; G-Alegría, E.; Polo, M. C.; Tenorio, C.; Martín-Álvarez, P. J.; Banda, M. T. C. D. L.; Ruiz-Larrea, F.; Moreno-Arribas, M. V. Wine Volatile and Amino Acid Composition after Malolactic Fermentation: Effect of Oenococcus oeni and Lactobacillus plantarum Starter Cultures. J. Agric. Food. Chem. 2005, 53, 8729-35. 44. Papadopoulou, C.; Soulti, K.; Roussis, I. G. Potential antimicrobial activity of red and white wine phenolic extracts against strains of Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli and Candida albicans. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 2005, 43, 41-46.

21



Page 22 of 32

FIGURE CAPTIONS 518

Figure 1. Changes of protein (continuous line) and amino nitrogen (dotted line)

519

along fermentation with different starters. Control: routine wheat Qu, square; Group 2:

520

amylase, glucoamylase and protease (10 U g-1), circle; Group 3: glucoamylase,

521

amylase, protease (10 U g-1) and sterilized wheat Qu, triangle.

522 523

Figure 2. Changes (A) and correlation (B) of yeast and amino nitrogen in Chinese rice wine-like medium. Yeast (square) and amino nitrogen (triangle).

524

Figure 3. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of BAs, ethanol, total sugar,

525

starch, amino acids, milling degree (the mass ratio of after milled rice and brown rice),

526

yeast in four milled rice fermentation samples (A), correlation of ethanol (% v/v) with

527

BA (B), PCA in three rice samples with different milling degree (C), correlation of

528

milling degree with BAs content (D).

529

Figure 4. Changes in amino acid (A) and BAs formation rate (B) during Chinese

530

rice wine fermentation. Amino acids: histidine (His), tyrosine (Tyr), phenylalanine

531

(Phe), lysine (Lys), ornithine (Orn), arginine (Arg). BAs: histamine (HIS), tyramine

532

(TYR), tryptamine (TRY), phenethylamine (PHE), cadaverine (CAD), spermidine

533

(SPD), spermine (SPM), putrescine (PUT). Samples were taken at 1.5, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 11,

534

16 and 21 days.

535

Figure 5. Changes in total BAs (A), linear regression (B), and BAs formation rate

536

(C) during Chinese rice wine fermentation. Strains were inoculated into CRW

537

fermentation after subculture. Control group, inverted triangle; single-strain

538

fermentation with Lactobacillus plantarum (ACBC271), square; single-strain

539

fermentation with Staphylococcus xylosus (CGMCC1.8382), circle; co-inoculation

540

with mixed strains of L. plantarum (ACBC271) and S. xylosus (CGMCC1.8382) at a 22


Page 23 of 32


541

ratio of 1:1, triangle. Samples were taken at 1.5, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 11, 16 and 21 days.

542

Figure 6. Changes in BAs (A) and piecewise linear regression (B) during CRW

543

fermentation in the presence of mixed starter culture at different ratios. Mixed strains

544

were co-inoculated at ratios of 1:1 and 1:2, respectively. LP+SX (1:1): L. plantarum

545

(ACBC271): S. xylosus (CGMCC1.8382) of 1:1, squares; LP+SX (1:2): L. plantarum

546

(ACBC271): S. xylosus (CGMCC1.8382) of 1:2, circle. Samples were taken at 1.5, 3, 4,

547

5, 6, 7, 11, 16 and 21 days.

548

Figure 7. Changes in total acid, ethanol and lactic acid bacteria during

549

fermentation with mixed starter culture(A), and content of eight BAs at the end of the

550

fermentation (B). Principal Component Analysis on 7 variables (LAB, ethanol, total

551

acid, BA, PUT, TYR, HIS), (C). Control, inverted triangle; LP-inoculated,

552

Lactobacillus plantarum (ACBC271), square; SX-inoculated, Staphylococcus xylosus

553

(CGMCC1.8382), circle; LP+SX-inoculated, Lactobacillus plantarum (ACBC271)

554

and Staphylococcus xylosus (CGMCC1.8382) at a ratio of 1:2, triangle. BAs: histamine

555

(HIS), tyramine (TYR), tryptamine (TRY), phenethylamine (PHE), cadaverine (CAD),

556

spermidine (SPD), spermine (SPM) and putrescine (PUT). Samples were taken at 1.5, 3,

557

4, 5, 6, 7, 11, 16 and 21 days.

23



Page 24 of 32

Table 1 Physicochemical properties of rice with different milling degree

Milling degree

Thousand grain

Starch

Protein

(%)

weight (g)

(g per 100 g)

(g per 100 g)

A

100

23.2

70.1

9.53

B

91

21.0

74.3

8.68

C

87

20.1

77.5

8.12

D

82

19.0

82.6

7.84

Number

Table 2 BAs concentration detection in medium of two starter strains BAs concentration (mg L-1)

L. plantarum (ACBC271)

S. xylosus (CGMCC1.8382)

Tryptamine

1.70 ± 0.14

81.68 ± 2.50

Phenethylamine

1.10 ± 0.06

88.36 ± 1.31

Putrescine

1.82 ± 0.06

80.40 ± 1.08

Cadaverine

2.52 ± 0.05

77.30 ± 1.49

Histamine

0.26 ± 0.13

53.94 ± 1.27

Tyramine

5.33 ± 0.19

65.08 ± 0.83

Spermine

0.57 ± 0.06

49.07 ± 2.03

Spermidine

0.75 ± 0.02

52.60 ± 3.65

Total BAs

14.05 ± 0.30

548.43 ± 4.26

24


Page 25 of 32


Figure 1

25



Page 26 of 32

Figure2

26


Page 27 of 32


Figure 3

27



Page 28 of 32

Figure 4

28


Page 29 of 32


Figure 5

29



Page 30 of 32

Figure 6

30


Page 31 of 32


Figure 7

31



Page 32 of 32

TOC graphic

32


Mixed Starter Culture Regulate Biogenic Amines Formation via

Recommend Documents