Nanoporous Sorbents for the Removal and Recovery of Phosphorus

Subscriber access provided by University of Winnipeg Library

Perspective

Nanoporous Sorbents for the Removal and Recovery of Phosphorus from Eutrophic Waters: Sustainability Challenges and Solutions Ali Othman, Eduard Dumitrescu, Daniel Andreescu, and Silvana Andreescu ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/ acssuschemeng.8b01809 • Publication Date (Web): 09 Aug 2018 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on August 11, 2018

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 61 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering

Nanoporous Sorbents for the Removal and Recovery of Phosphorus from Eutrophic Waters: Sustainability Challenges and Solutions

Ali Othman, Eduard Dumitrescu, Daniel Andreescu, and Silvana Andreescu*

Department of Chemistry and Biomolecular Science, 8 Clarkson Ave, Clarkson University, Potsdam, New York 13699-5810, USA.

E-mail: [email protected]; Fax: +(315) 268 6610; Tel: +(315) 268 2394

1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 2 of 61

ABSTRACT The increased industrial and agricultural activity has affected the availability of phosphorous (P) in nature and has caused significant imbalance in the P cycle with long term consequences on ecosystem health and sustainability. While P is an essential element for food production as well as plant and animal nutrition, it is also a limited non-renewable resource whose availability is expected to decrease in the next century. Widespread application of P-based fertilizers and their excessive accumulation in water bodies leads to eutrophication which is associated with overgrowth of harmful algal blooms and degradation of water quality. This paper provides an overview of contemporary challenges and methodologies for improving P use efficiency and sustainability in the environment. Technologies and processes for the removal of P-containing compounds from water through the use of functional nanomaterial sorbents with tailored surface properties for capture, removal and recycling are described. Various classes of materials including carbon-based, zeolites, mesoporous silica, metal organic frameworks, metal oxides and hydroxides, biomass-derived materials and P-binding receptors are reviewed along with their properties, binding affinity and adsorption capacity. The potential of these materials to control the amount of P in the environment and create decision support tools for water resource management is also discussed, with examples of applications.

Keywords: sustainable water management, water resources, phosphate, nutrient reuse and recovery


Page 3 of 61 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


INTRODUCTION The management of water resources is one of the most challenging problems faced at local and global levels. The water circuit has implications in both the availability of clean water sources for human consumption as well as for the normal functioning of natural ecosystems. Human activities and advances in industrial and agricultural processes have greatly affected the quality of water resources and impacted the nutrient cycle, which is essential for all forms of life. The main effects are observed in the nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P)-cycles in the ecosystem, two elements that are vital for living organisms. P is part of the building blocks of cells and plays an important role in bioenergetic processes and in the storage and processing of genetic information.1 While P is an essential element for all forms of life and its supply is needed to sustain crop production, its excessive use and release in the environment leads to unwanted consequences. When used constantly as a fertilizer to improve crop production, excess P can cause extreme growth of plants and toxic algal blooms in bodies of water2, essentially acting as a pollutant when present in high concentrations. Enrichment of water by nutrients e.g. eutrophication, is a major societal and economic problem that has gained renewed interest in the past decade.3-5 Main concerns are: i) ensuring the global agricultural needs and food production for an increasing population which is highly dependent on P-resources, ii) counteracting the environmental damages caused by the excess release of P nutrients (e.g. leaching from agricultural fields leading to eutrophication), iii) depletion of natural reserves of P that are limited and non-renewable6-7 and iv) the inefficient mobilization of P resources across the globe and the associated economic impact. Managing and controlling the P-cycle is essential for ensuring an overall nutrient balance and achieving equilibrium between beneficial and harmful effects. With the growing incidence of eutrophication, the scientific community is faced with the challenge to develop solutions to the problems associated with the limited supply, increasing demand and damaging effects of P in the environment. This review discusses the latest advances in materials science and engineering, with focus on nanoporous sorbents that can provide sustainable solutions to capture, recycle and reuse P-containing nutrients from the environment and address sustainability challenges associated with the P-cycle in the environment. 3 ACS Paragon Plus Environment


Page 4 of 61

Nanoporous sorbents represent a new wave of materials that can be engineered at the nanoscale level to monitor and control the amount of P-containing fertilizers. The surface of these materials can be modified to provide binding sites and form stable and reversible complexes to capture, remove and recycle P in their nanoporous network. Based on these principles, nanoporous sorbents can be used in water treatment, filtration and sensing. This paper outlines the varying types of nanoporous materials that can be used to bind and remove P and develop technology and decision support systems for water resources management.

PHOSPHORUS SOURCES, SPECIATION AND CONCENTRATION Global food production relies on the use of fertilizers and pesticides containing P for the treatment of crops.8-9 The rapid population growth in the 20th century leads to an increased use of P-based crop additives in order to sustain the food demand.10-11 Fertilizers and pesticides are produced using raw materials obtained from the mining of phosphate rock. Based on the available estimations, the global phosphate rock reserves are expected to decrease significantly in the next century.12-13 The latest estimates indicate that Morocco and Western Sahara own the vast majority of available phosphate resources, followed by China, Algeria, Syria, and United States among others.3, 14 There is a general consensus within the scientific community that the current practices in the P supply-chain are not sustainable in the long-term.13 At the same time, the intensive use of P-containing fertilizers and pesticides has resulted in a significant increase in the global flux of P and a growing demand for industrial production.10-11 P is extracted from phosphate rock deposits, which are used as the primary source for the production of fertilizers. Another source is leached P present in the runoff and waste streams originating from mining, agricultural industrial activities,15-17 and domestic wastewaters, e.g. food waste and sewage from domestic users.18-19 While about 80% of mined P ends up in fertilizers, pesticides, and animal feeds, almost half of this amount is lost in agricultural activities through soil leaching and erosion.8 Food production and consumption are also responsible for the loss of P in the food supply-chain through food and human waste. It has been estimated that only for US, 85% of the mined P is lost in the environment somewhere along the food supply-chain.2021

While fertilizers and pesticides are needed in agriculture to maximize crops production, their

presence causes excessive growth of biota in environments in which they are released, affecting 4 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 5 of 61 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


aquatic ecosystems from the smallest streams to oceans.22 The excessive accumulation of P and N-containing species in surface waters leads to eutrophication,2, 17, 23-24 has severe consequences on the environment and human health (Table 1).25-26

Table 1. Potential effects of eutrophication, caused by excessive loading of N and P in lakes, reservoirs, rivers and coastal oceans (adapted from reference2). Effects of eutrophication Increased biomass of phytoplankton and macrophyte vegetation Increased biomass of consumer species Shifts to bloom-forming algal species that might be toxic or inedible Increases in blooms of gelatinous zooplankton (marine environments) Increased biomass of benthic and epiphytic algae Changes in species composition of macrophyte vegetation Declines in coral reef health and loss of coral reef communities Increased incidence of fish mortality Reduction in species diversity Reduction in harvestable fish and shellfish biomass Decreased water transparency Oxygen depletion Taste, odor, and drinking water treatment issues Decreased drinking water resources Altered recreational and aesthetic values of the water bodies P can be found in different forms, as inorganic phosphates27 and as a constituent of organic compounds, some of which are commonly used as pesticides in agriculture, e.g. organophosphates such as paraoxon, diclorvos, chlorpyrifos and diazinon.28-29,

30

Inorganic

phosphates exist as PO43-, HPO42-, H2PO4-, or H3PO4, depending on pH.22 The different ionic forms can be found as neutral species in solution (H3PO4, pKa1 =2.1) at low pH (2.1 ± 0.5), and as negative ions such as H2PO4− and HPO42− (pKa2 = 7.2 and pKa3 = 12.3, respectively) at pH values between 3 and 10. When the pH is above pH 12.3, phosphate is fully deprotonated, i.e., PO43−.31 The inorganic P forms may be present as both soluble or particulate matter.32 Particulate 5 ACS Paragon Plus Environment


Page 6 of 61

inorganic P is found in sediments combined with calcium, iron, or aluminum.33 In ocean water, soluble inorganic P represents the largest share of the total P.34 Speciation of P in smaller water bodies (lakes and rivers, ponds, etc.) is harder to predict, as variable composition of soluble or particulate, inorganic or organic P are possible depending on the source of release. Variability is observed as well in the reported P concentrations for different water and waste streams. Mean concentrations of total P between 0.1 and 30 mg/L were reported for several different anthropogenic sources in UK.35 Estimations based on data collected in periodic national surveys conducted by the U.S. EPA suggest that increasing concentrations of total P are ubiquitous, with the median total P being 0.056 mg/L (2014 survey) for streams and 0.037 mg/L in lakes (2012 survey).36 While water streams contain relatively low concentrations of total P, animal waste streams may contain as much as 2.4 mg/L total P.37 The overall lack of homogeneity in the speciation pattern and concentration range of P species in water and waste streams is an impediment in the search for an universal approach for recapture and reuse of P.

PHOSPHORUS

IN

THE

ENVIRONMENT:

CAUSES,

CONSEQUENCES

AND

EUTROPHICATION EFFECTS Well-known examples of water ecosystems affected by eutrophication are the Lake Erie basin,3839

the Gulf of Mexico,40 the Great Barrier Reef lagoon,41 and the Baltic Sea42. Excess nutrients in

water determine an increased production and development of phytoplankton, micro- and macroalgae.43 As a consequence, aquatic ecosystems may suffer changes in species productivity and composition due to competition for light and reduced oxygen availability, leading to the formation of “dead or hypoxic zones” in water bodies.44-45 Vascular plants, coral reefs, and finfish species are mostly affected by poor health, migration, or death and extinction.41, 46 From a health perspective, exposure to or ingestion of water with high content of phosphate can lead to impaired renal function, rhabdomyolysis, tumour lysis syndrome, or even death in humans.47 Another consequence of eutrophication is the release of toxins by blue-green algae formations (cyanobacteria).48-50 Exposure to cyanobacteria is associated with sickness in humans51 and wildlife mortality.52 The lack of clean water affects primarily communities with limited sources of drinking water and developing regions that rely on untested or untreated water sources. Poor water quality has direct economic and societal implications such as: increased drinking water 6 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 7 of 61 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


treatment costs, restoration of biodiversity in affected ecosystems, altered tourism and recreational activities in the region of affected lakes and water bodies, and decreased value of lakefront properties.53 The estimated total economic cost of eutrophication mitigation in US is around $2.2 billion, but this is most likely a conservative assessment.53 In the current state, the global P cycle is not sustainable, without adopting measures for the recovery and reuse. Strategies to prevent the excessive loss of nutrients in the environment3 and improve conservation and recycling are needed to reduce the harmful consequences of eutrophication (Figure 1) and achieve a sustainable P supply.27

Figure 1. Schematic of the supply-chain of P from mining, industry and agricultural use to human consumption. Phosphate rock is mined as a phosphorus source to produce fertilizers and pesticides for agricultural use. Inefficient use at each step of the extraction, production and use as well as food and human waste represent other major sources of P. Excess nutrients impact water bodies by forming toxic blue-green algae (cyanobacteria) blooms with harmful consequences on human health and aquatic ecosystems.



Page 8 of 61

While complete loss of P in the environment is unavoidable, steps can be taken to manage the effects of eutrophication in the most affected areas and provide a more sustainable and responsible use.54-55 Strategies to bring the lost P back in use from each steps of its supply-chain, while at the same time preventing release during food production, distribution and consumption, and human waste treatment are also needed.6 Recycling approaches are essential towards shifting from reliance on mined phosphate rock to a more effective utilization of P fertilizers obtained from sources within the food supply-chain. Recycling methods can be developed to capture P from waste streams originating from industries relying on P use, runoff and erosion streams from agricultural and post-harvest activities, crop residues and dairy operations, final food products waste, human waste and sewage.37,

56-57

Considering the importance of recycling P towards

ensuring a sustainable food supply-chain in the future, there is a need to develop technologies that can efficiently capture and recover P, enabling its reuse in the fertilizer industry. Progress of nanotechnology has stimulated the development of new nanoporous material sorbents with unique surface sorption properties that can be used in the treatment of P-rich water streams, waste streams, or runoff for P-capture and recycling.

TECHNOLOGIES FOR PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL Chemical precipitation, crystallization, biological processes and adsorption, are reviewed here as the most commonly known technologies for removal and recovery of P from wastewater. The charged forms of phosphate can be involved in electrostatic interactions with charged sorbents and participate in ligand exchange mechanisms with ionic species from the surface. Phosphates can also form complexes with a variety of metal (M) ions, as MPO4. These interactions constitute the basis of most P-removal technologies.

Chemical precipitation. A common method to remove P from wastewaters and reduce effluent concentrations below 1.0 mg P/L is through chemical precipitation. The process involves the addition of metal salts of aluminum, calcium, magnesium or iron to react with soluble phosphate and form solid precipitates.58 In the chemical precipitation techniques, 80–99 % P can be removed and recovered from wastewater streams

in the form of fertilizer (magnesium

ammonium phosphate or struvite).59 Karapinar et al.60 utilized ammonium-loaded zeolite as a 8 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 9 of 61 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


seeding material for precipitating calcium phosphate and suggested the possibility of using the precipitate-ammonium loaded zeolites as fertilizer. The efficiency of chemical precipitation is affected by alkalinity, organic matter content and the coexistent metals.61 The process can generate a large amount of sludge, due to the precipitation of P-bonded chemicals, and release magnesium and aluminum that could have secondary effects on the environment. The method is sensitive to seasonal and diurnal variations in temperature and changes in feed concentrations which make this approach a less attractive option for wastewater treatment.

Crystallization. An alternative strategy is to crystallize P by inducing super-saturation, nucleation and crystal growth on seeding materials such as calcite, sand, magnetite and a variety of Ca phosphate crystals62-64. The distinction between precipitation and crystallization is generally based on the speed of the process and the size of the solid particles produced. Furthermore, instead of bulky sludge produced by precipitation, the crystallization process generates high purity phosphate crystal pellets that can be reused as an alternative to mined phosphate.65 This method is the basis of the Phosnix process, a commercially available technology that utilizes a column reactor with ancillary chemical dosing equipment for nucleation and growth of struvite crystals followed by ion exchange–precipitation.

Biological processes. Biological treatment thorough the use of photosynthetic organisms (algae, plants, and planktonic bacteria) which uptake P as an energy reserve represents a sustainable alternative for the removal of P. Soluble P is assimilated as polyphosphate by Phosphorous Accumulating Organisms (PAOs) which utilize P within their cells for growth.66 The P can be recovered after separation of the accumulated biomass from the treated water.66 Biological aerated filters (BAF) are widely employed in wastewater treatment for nitrogen and phosphorus removal in a single reactor, with reduced space and cost requirements. To increase efficiency for phosphorus removal, BAFs are often used as a secondary treatment, after a pre-treatment step using coagulants to chemically precipitate phosphorus.29-30 Addition of the coagulant directly into the BAF reactor may induce filter clogging and inhibition of the microbial activity. Other limitations of the biological treatment method are the sensitivity to seasonal variations in temperature and changes in feed concentrations, and low efficiency for achieving removal of low P concentrations. 9 ACS Paragon Plus Environment


Page 10 of 61

Adsorption. The most simple and cost effective method for P removal is through adsorption on porous materials.67 The method relies on the P-sorption properties of certain materials to bind and capture P in a targeted manner. Most adsorbents are carbon based but other materials such as zeolites, metal oxides, functional polymers and composites have been reported.68 Adsorption can involve weak physical forces through electrostatic or van der Waals interactions, or chemical processes via formation of chemical bonds between the adsorbed P and the active functional sites of the sorbent. In contrast to earlier discussed techniques, adsorption is a highly efficient process, particularly for low P concentration. The success of the adsorption method depends on the selection of a suitable sorbent and the presence (or possibilities for grafting) of P-binding sites to its surface. Parameters to consider include the adsorption/removal capacity, kinetics, recyclability/reuse, compatibility, cost, and local availability.69 Furthermore, an ideal adsorbent should have large surface area, pore volume, and abundant accessible functionalities to sorb and desorb P, as well as, increased stability and lifetime. Additionally, sorbents should be selective for P and able to remove P down to 50 µg/L, which is the EPA recommended limit to prevent algae blooms. Indeed, it is challenging to find a material that could meet all of the requirements of an ideal sorbent. More effective materials are needed to improve removal efficiency while also providing possibilities for recovery and reuse. Nanoporous materials could provide alternative sorbents with increased sorption efficiency due to their high surface area. In the next section, we discuss recent research on the development of nanoporous materials for adsorption, removal and recovery of P

CHARACTERISTICS OF ADSORBENTS FOR REMOVAL AND RECOVERY Adsorption characteristics. The properties of the adsorbent which include surface area, porosity (specific surface area, pore volume, and pore size distribution), surface charge and the availability of P-binding sites strongly influence removal efficiency. Ideally, the sorbent should be regenerated for reuse, while conserving the same sorption characteristics for multiple cycles. At the same time, the captured P should be easily detached and freed from materials in order to be reused as a fertilizer. Adsorption can vary significantly depending on the environment and therefore functionality under relevant conditions of pH, temperature and ionic composition 10 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 11 of 61 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


should be demonstrated. Generally, the adsorption capacity is greater for higher surface area materials due to increasing pore volumes. Porosity and surface area characteristics are commonly measured using the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) method by nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherms at 77 K. The adsorbent efficiency also depends on the surface charge of the material. Therefore sorbents should be selected based on their isoelectric point (pHpzc) to ensure charge complementarity. Typically, adsorption involves weak electrostatic, Lewis acid-base or hydrophobic interactions. These interactions are pH dependent and binding can vary with the pH of the environment. The dominant species of phosphates, for example, HPO42− and H2PO4− are negatively charged over a wide pH range. When pH is below the pHpzc of the adsorbent (i.e., pH < pHpzc), its surface is positively charged enhancing adsorption. On the other hand, at higher pH (i.e., pH > pHpzc), the adsorbent surface is more likely negatively charged, leading to decreased adsorption affinity (Figure 2).

Figure 2. Proposed mechanisms for the removal of phosphate in acidic and alkaline conditions.

The binding affinity is another important consideration. The binding affinity is usually determined by the fitting data using Langmuir isotherm equation (eq (1)) through an overall consideration of the adsorption isotherms.

(1)

Where Ce (mg/L) and qe (mg/g) are the aqueous concentration and adsorbed concentration at adsorption equilibrium; qmax (mg/g) is the maximum adsorption capacity, and KL is the affinity



Page 12 of 61

coefficient. The KL can be further used for calculating the dimensionless separation factor (RL), which is defined as: RL = 1/(1 + KL Co)

(2)

Where Co is the initial concentration of the metal ions. The RL value indicates the shape of the isotherm. RL values between 0 and 1 indicate favorable adsorption70. Also RL values can be either unfavorable (RL > 1), linear (RL = 1), or irreversible (RL =0). RL also can be plotted versus Co. The decrease of RL with the increase of the initial Co concentration is indicative of favorable adsorption of phosphate onto the adsorbent71. The value varies with the Co concentration. Examples of reported RL values for phosphate binding affinity are 0.3 to 0.6 at Co between 5 and 150 mg P/L72, and between 0.3 and 0.8 at Co between 9–982 mg P/L onto Fe-Al-bentonite (FAB) following a monolayer adsorption model73. The Freundlich adsorption isotherm can be plotted to determine sorption capacity for nonideal sorption on heterogeneous surfaces, and multilayer adsorption, which is defined as: log qe = (1/n) log Ce + log Kf

(3)

Where Ce is the equilibrium concentration (mg/L), qe is the amount adsorbed at equilibrium (mg/g), Kf is the Partition Coefficient (mg/g) and n is the intensity of adsorption. High percent removal is generally obtained for low phosphate concentrations but as the concentration increases the percentage removal decreases. When a large surface area sorbent is used, as in the case of nanoporous sorbents, numerous adsorption sites are available that can catch most phosphate when this is present at lower concentrations, whereas at high concentrations the adsorption sites become limited. Experimental kinetic data obtained from Langmuir and Freundlich adsorption isotherms can be used to describe the type of adsorption, e.g. monolayer or multilayer. A composite material of magnesite and bentonite clay was able to remove more than 99% of phosphate between the range of 2 to 200 mg/L at pH 10 after 30 min incubation following a monolayer adsorption model, fitted to the Langmuir adsorption isotherm.74 Porous materials can serve as sorbents by themselves or they can be modified with organic or inorganic species to enhance P-binding and improve selectivity.75 Specific P-binding receptors can be incorporated within/onto porous materials to facilitate separation and recovery. Therefore, the surface of nanosorbents can be carefully designed to provide binding sites for P 12 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 13 of 61 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


which in addition to their porosity and large surface area provide promising feature for enhancing recovery of P.76 For example, graphene alone is unable to retain phosphate due to electrostatic repulsion. However, reduced graphene that has been modified with positively charged metal ions (e.g. La3+) enabled removal of phosphate and nitrate through coordination with the carboxylate groups of the modified graphene.77 High performance adsorbents with Pseparation and recovery can be developed by incorporating P-binding receptors to supporting materials such as mesoporous silica structures, magnetic particles or polymers. The rapidly growing class of supramolecular phosphate-binding receptors provides opportunities for enhancing sorption activity and selectivity for phosphate binding.78 The recyclability of the adsorbent defined by its ability to bind and release P-compounds for multiple cycles is another characteristic that should be considered in order to ensure efficient recycling of the sorbent and enable the reuse of the bound P. Various regeneration techniques have been reported such as thermal (high temperature calcination)79, chemical, electrochemical80, biological, and oxidizing81 methods. Thermal and chemical treatment methods are the most common due to their cost-effectiveness and practicality. In the thermal process, the temperature and the regeneration time of the sorbent can affect the percent recovery in further cycles. Chemical treatment using acids and bases can desorb phosphate as a function of pH, and provide an effective strategy to recover the bound phosphate by changing the pH environment. However, some adsorbents can be affected under extreme acidic and basic conditions82 and may leach into the environment. Salts have been also used as desorbing agents to destabilize surface charge. However, addition of a high concentration of salt may result in high salinity to the soil that might have an adverse effect on plant growth if the phosphate recovered is reused as a fertilizer.83

Challenges of designing effective sorbents. Several challenges exist when designing sorbents for P-removal. These include interferences from other competing species, potential biofouling, large scale manufacturing, stability and toxicity considerations of the sorbent material. Ideal sorbents should enable effective removal of P from streams that usually have a variable and complex composition. In general, wastewater contains significant concentrations of solid matter, dissolved and particulate matter, nutrients, cations and anions, organic matter, as well as microorganisms.84 The concentrations of P species are likely much smaller than concentrations of typical cations and anions found in water bodies. Typical cations (e.g. calcium, magnesium, 13 ACS Paragon Plus Environment


Page 14 of 61

potassium, sodium) are present in concentrations of 4-70 mg/L, while typical anions (e.g. carbonate, bicarbonate, chloride, nitrate, sulfate) reach concentrations of 5-100 mg/L.85 Salt concentrations are also known to affect the removal capabilities of sorbents.86 Interference from cations and anions are usually reported for new materials developed for P adsorption; however, there are multiple other wastewater composition parameters not assessed.87 P sorbents should demonstrate performance in realistic environmental samples at relevant concentrations of P species and co-existing ions. Many matrix constituents can also cause fouling of sorbents, a major problem for filtration systems in wastewater treatment. Fouling can be caused by inorganic or organic matter, particulate or colloidal matter, or microbial/biological derived matter (biofouling).88 The issue of fouling is rarely discussed in regard with P capture and wastewater treatment. Development of P sorbents would benefit from studies to understanding the fouling mechanisms in wastewater systems as well as the implementation of materials with antifouling properties. To ensure environmental sustainability, development of P-sorbents should consider principles of green chemistry when dealing with eutrophication and nutrient pollution while trying to tackle the challenging issues related to P recovery, reuse, and pollution prevention. While the principles of green chemistry are generally applicable to all aspects of research and development,89 achieving sustainability in nanotechnology is still an area that needs to be addressed.90 Only a few reports have highlighted green approaches for the synthesis of P-capture materials.91-94 Implementation of nanotechnology-enabled materials in wastewater treatment is not risk-free. The potential environmental impact of engineered materials represents a concern for toxicologists.95 From this perspective, it is important to assess toxicity characteristics of developed P sorbents, evaluate potential leaching and dissolution during use and consider the overall environmental impact of disposed materials. Many of the reported approaches do not consider the environmental health and safety implications of these materials. Variable levels of toxicity have been associated with the exposure to carbon-based nanomaterials,96 magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles,97 titanium dioxide nanoparticles,98 nano-sized aluminum and aluminum oxide,99 manganese oxide micro and nanoparticles,100 nano- and micro-sized lanthanum oxide.101 There is limited information about risks associated with exposure to more novel materials such as nanostructured metal-organic frameworks and nanocomposites.102 Although these materials


Page 15 of 61 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


have been successfully proven as viable sorbents for P, there is still a need to assess potential hazards associated with their use within water and wastewater treatment technologies.103 In the following section we review the main classes of porous sorbents, their properties and applications for the removal, recovery and conversion of P from environmental wastewaters.

NANOPOROUS SORBENTS FOR THE REMOVAL AND RECOVERY OF P The many different types of nanoscale materials that can be created with defined pore structure (size, shape, connectivity, etc.) and controllable physicochemical properties can be used as adsorbents with high sorption capacity and improved P-removal efficiency. These can be used in a variety of configurations, as sorbents, catalysts, membranes or filters and can be used in urban, municipal, domestic and agricultural wastewater.104 Advantages of nanoporous materials include high surface area, large pore volume, and the possibility to control charge, accessibility and availability of surface functional groups105-106 all of which enhance chemical activity and adsorption capacity of contaminants within their structure. The surface of nanosorbents that can be carefully designed or modified to provide binding sites for P making these materials promising candidates for the removal and recovery of P-containing compounds.

Carbon-based materials. Carbonaceous-based materials, such as activated carbon (AC), graphene (GR), carbon nanoparticles (CNPs) and carbon nanotubes (CNTs) are some of the most promising materials for contaminant adsorption and wastewater treatment. Their applications can be extended to adsorption and removal of P. Activated carbon is the most widely used adsorbent to remove contaminants from water matrices.107 The highly porous adsorptive structure, high specific surface area and pore volumes, relatively low cost and fast adsorption kinetics provide excellent properties for water treatment processes, with demonstrated capabilities for removal of organic pollutants, volatile organic compounds, dyes and heavy metals.108 AC is produced by activation of carbon-containing materials using chemical agents (e.g. potassium hydroxide) or by physical processes (high temperature steam). Agricultural waste can also be used as a sustainable source.109 Following application, AC can be regenerated or disposed as waste.108 To increase Pbinding selectivity over other anions that may be present in water such as Cl-, NO3-, CO32-, and SO42-, the carbon is typically modified with metals or metal oxides/hydroxides that have high P15 ACS Paragon Plus Environment


Page 16 of 61

binding capacity. Lanthanum (La) has high affinity toward phosphates by forming La phosphates at the surface and therefore La is one of the most commonly used surface modifiers to increase P-binding affinity.110 ACF-LaO adsorbents are characterized by good chemical and physical stability. Examples of sorbents for P removal include activated carbon modified with La hydroxide (ACF-LaOH)111 and oxide (ACF-La).112 Incorporation of La hydroxide into the framework of activated carbon fibers was shown to enhance phosphate adsorption. The strategy can be applied to other carbon based materials. The content of La in ACF-LaOH determined by inductively coupled plasma (ICP) was 52.9 mg/g. After adsorption of phosphate, the La content decreased to 47 mg/g indicating some loss of La by precipitation. Long term use of the sorbent may also results in damage and potential release of fibers from the adsorbent surface. Other forms of carbon, like GR and its oxidized form, graphene oxide (GO), as well as CNTs, are emerging as promising sorbents for the removal of P. These materials have high specific surface area and abundant binding sites, oxygen functionalities, high thermal and chemical stability, and can be easy functionalized to enhance adsorption/separation processes for the removal of pollutants.113-116 However, the nonspecific interactions between GR/GO nanosheets and the adsorbate might result in poor selectivity. To enhance adsorption capacity and improve selectivity for phosphate anions over other interfering ions present in water, these materials are often modified with organics, metals, metal oxides/hydroxides or magnetic particles.77,

82, 117-118

Examples of GR/GO-based adsorbents that have demonstrated P-removal

capabilities include: zirconia-functionalized GO (Zr-GO)119, and expanded graphite (EG) loaded with lanthanum oxide (EG-LaO)120. Zirconia-functionalized GO (Zr-GO)121 was synthesized and its adsorption performance for the removal of phosphate in water was evaluated by batch and column tests. The use of nanosized ZrO2 dispersed on the graphite oxide surface enhanced phosphate adsorption capability on Zr-GO compared with GO. Phosphate binding was supressed by increasing pH. Regeneration and reuse of the sorbent was demonstrated over 11 consecutive adsorption–desorption cycles using alkali treatment by a 0.1 M NaOH solution. The equilibrium data fitted with the Langmuir adsorption isotherm indicated monolayer adsorption of phosphate on the surface of GO-Zr. In other studies, zirconia-functionalized graphite oxide absorbent demonstrated good performance for the removal of phosphate.121 Toxic anhydrous toluene and a N2 atmosphere were used in the synthesis, which made the preparation procedure complex and difficult to implement at a large scale. An alternative one-step hydrothermal preparation method 16 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 17 of 61 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


of zirconium-loaded reduced graphene oxide (RGO-Zr) sorbent was demonstrated with high adsorption ability for phosphate removal122. Expanded graphite (EG) is another possible material that demonstrated high adsorption capacity. The maximum phosphate adsorption capacity of EG loaded with lanthanum oxide (EG-LaO)123 calculated using the Langmuir model was 12.6 mg/g. In the presence of interfering ions such as F-, Cl-, NO3-, CO32-, and SO42- adsorption of phosphate decreased due to competition of these ions for the same binding sites as phosphate. Mahdavi et al., studied the removal of phosphate from aqueous solutions by using CuO and CNTs.124 The phosphate sorption capacities in absence of competing anions were 15.4 and 23.9 mg/g (PO43−-P) for CNTs and CuO, respectively. Despite promising characteristics in water decontamination, the use of CNTs and multiwalled CNTs (MWCNTs), NPs and nanocomposites, their potential release can alter diversity of bacterial community in wastewater125 and therefore toxicity should be further evaluated when considering the use of these sorbents for large scale applications.

Biomass-derived sorbents. Along with conventional carbonaceous nanomaterials, biomassderived materials have received a great deal of interest as a cost effective and environmentally friendly approach to remove phosphate from wastewaters.66 Biomass-derived carbons or biochar have high porosity and a large surface area. These are commonly synthesized by pyrolysis from widely available and renewable feedstock. Common sources of carbon from biomass that have been explored for P-removal include: refined aspen wood fiber,126 coir path,127 eggshell waste,128 and Staphylococcus xylosus biomass,129 and a modified carbon residue from biomass.130 Engineered biochar prepared from Mg-enriched tomato tissues as sorbents for P removal from aqueous solutions has been also reported.131 Dolochar, a solid waste produced in the sponge iron industry has demonstrated high P-removal efficiency.132 Other promising adsorbents include modified wheat residue,133 activated fruit juice (Citrus limetta) residue, rice husk134 and agrowaste rice husk ash,135 as well as activated sewage sludge.136 The main limitation of biochar is the leakage of P under different environmental conditions which can affect eutrophication137-140. For example, the release of P from biochar by two types of Lysinibacillus strains (Lysinibacillus sphaericus D-8 and Lysinibacillus fusiformis A-5) reached 54% and 47%, respectively. In addition, the surface and physicochemical properties of the biochar have changed during the adsorption process which may be caused by microbial activity.141 About 2.2 mg g−1 P was 17 ACS Paragon Plus Environment


Page 18 of 61

released from a raw biochar (contained 4.7 mg P g−1) at an initial pH of 9.0 in the first 8 h. The release of P (orthophosphate) was significantly enhanced by coexisting anions Cl-, NO3- or SO42due to competitive ion exchange effects.138 Adsorption on these materials is achieved by specific interactions between the phosphate molecules and carbonaceous network, modified with P-selective sorbents, as discussed earlier. These include composites with layered hydroxides, nanostructured metal oxides or the carbon network impregnated with La to increase sorption capacity.7, 126 Figure 3 summarizes possible mechanisms for phosphate adsorption on pristine and modified porous carbonaceous materials, selected here as model sorbent. Similar mechanisms occur on other sorbents such as double layer hydroxides, metal oxides and polymer composites.

Figure 3. Schematic representation summarizing possible mechanisms for phosphate adsorption on pristine and modified nanoporous sorbents.

Silica-based materials: mesoporous silica. Ordered mesoporous silica (SiO2) with pore sizes between 2-50 nm and silica-ceramic materials have attracted significant interest as porous sorbents for environmental applications due to their low toxicity, structural stability and chemical resistance.142 Mesoporous silica functionalized with metal-chelate ligands showed excellent anion exchange behavior for arsenate, molybdate, and chromate.143-144 Silica gels have been modified with siloxane (Si-O-Si) or silanol groups (Si-OH) to enhance hydroxyl 18 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 19 of 61 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


functionalities and provide coordination sites for binding of phosphate. Functionalization with amine groups (mono, di or tri, i.e., N-silane) has also been shown to enhance adsorption of phosphate on mesoporous silica.145 Cationic metal−EDA complexes anchored inside mesoporous silica MCM-41 supports (Cu(II)−EDA-SAMMS and Fe(III)−EDA-SAMMS) demonstrated high sorption performance for phosphate anions in batch experiments146. The adsorption of phosphate was pH dependent, increasing with increasing pH from 1 to 6.5 and decreasing above pH of 6.5. The material displayed rapid sorption rate (99% of phosphate removal within 1 min) and the ability to remove low concentrations of phosphate to ∼10 µg/L, which is lower than the EPA’s established freshwater contaminant level for phosphorus (20 µg/L). Rapid phosphate sorption was explained by the rigid and open pore structure of the mesoporous silica, allowing easy access of phosphate anions to the binding sites.146 The adsorption was affected by high ionic strength (0.1 M NaCl) but it was relatively unaffected by bicarbonate, sulfate and citrate anions. In another work, La-doped mesoporous hollow SiO2 spheres with an ordered hexagonal mesoporous structure enabled removal of phosphate with a removal capacity of 47.9 mg P/g when silica was loaded with 22.4% La. The mesoposous structure provided fast adsorption kinetics with phosphate removal capacity of 99.7%.31 High removal rates were also obtained with SiO2 NPs deposited on activated carbon nanocomposites.147 Nanomaterials of magnesium hydrosilicate Mg3Si2O5(OH)4 having an interlamellar structure enabled recovery of phosphate and ammonium from wastewater148 with adsorbing capacities of ~19 mg/g for phosphate and 7.8 mg/g for ammonium. The phosphate sorption characteristics of mesoporous silica-based, metal oxides/hydroxides/sulfate and carbon-based materials have been reviewed recently by Huang et al.149

Zeolites. Zeolites are porous aluminum silicates with an opened framework architecture of [SiO4]4- and [AlO4]5- and high cation exchange and ion adsorption capacity allowing for the removal of inorganic ions, trace and radioactive elements in water purification applications150151

. Zeolites are obtained from natural sources at low cost. Surface modification with La or other

ions increases their P-sorption properties making them valuable materials for remediation of Penriched waters.152-153 A zeolitic material synthesized from fly ash and its calcium-modified form demonstrated phosphate-sorption capacities of 57±5 and 203±11 mg P-PO4/g for the native and Ca-zeolite sorbent154. The removal mechanism involves complexation through the AlOH surface 19 ACS Paragon Plus Environment


Page 20 of 61

groups of the zeolitic structure originally present as Al oxides, or through formation of Caphosphate phases, mainly brushite. The process is pH dependent and showed a maximum sorption capacity at pH 8.154 Phosphate removal efficiency of a synthetic Al3+ activated zeolite (HUD) was shown to be affected by coexisting ions.69 Using the Al-HUD system, ions like Cl-, SO42- and NO3- slightly improved removal rate through outer-sphere complexation with Pbinding sites while fluorides (F-) showed reduced removal capacity. Hybrid adsorbents of a zeolite from coal fly and lanthanum hydroxide (La-ZFA) reached an absorption capacity of 66.09 mg P/g through phosphate binding to LaOH and showed 97.3% removal efficiency of phosphate from lake water and 97.9% from a wastewater effluent. The process was affected by presence of anions (Cl-, NO3-, SO42- and HCO3-).94, 136, 153 Phosphate-sorption mechanism on zeolites and the sorbent-phosphate interactions involving charged AlOH sites for hydroxylated, neutral and protonated forms at different pH values can be depicted as:69

Metal oxides and hydroxides. Metal oxides and hydroxides of iron155-156, zirconium157-158, aluminum,159 and manganese (IV)160 are some of the most widely studied materials for P adsorption, removal and recovery via Lewis acid based interactions and ion exchange mechanisms. The interest in these sorbents originates from their amphoteric characteristics, chemical stability and cost effective synthesis.83 While these materials can be used a sorbents by themselves, their capacity can be increased by loading them on high surface area materials like graphene,111 mixing with other oxides, or by doping with La. These composite structures can remove phosphates through combined surface adsorption, complexation and ligand exchange mechanisms31. Removal of phosphates with La-doped oxides can be shown as:


Page 21 of 61 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


The adsorption of phosphate on manganese dioxide (δMnO2) in a simple electrolyte solution (0.7 M NaCl) and seawater was shown to occur through a surface complexation model with formation of outer-sphere phosphate complexes on the surface of δMnO2. Performance of this system in seawater varied with pH, temperature, and salinity.160 SO42- and humic acid were found to suppress adsorption at low pH but had no effects in the pH of seawater, while Ca2+ and Mg2+ enhanced adsorption at pH > 4 due to changes in surface charge and phosphate speciation at different pH values.161 High adsorption capacity of 588.4 mg/g was obtained with nanosized magnesium hydroxide impregnated on high surface area graphitized mesocarbon obtained from waste, which promoted multilayer adsorption.162 Precipitation of the metal ion with the phosphate could limit recyclability and reuse of these complexes for agricultural purposes.163 Safety considerations related to the potential release of transition-metals in the environments are lacking and should be further studied. Iron oxide NPs are another class of oxides that have shown high P-adsorption capacity. These oxides provide added magnetic capabilities which facilitate facile removal and recovery through magnetic action. P-removal can be achieved on zerovalent iron164 and on magnetic NPs coated with humic acid,165 impregnated within nanosized La hydroxides.77,166 or mixed with other oxides such as core-shell Ce-Ti@Fe3O4 NPs.167 Phosphate adsorption capacities of 28.9 mg/g (at pH 6) were obtained with humic acid coated magnetic NPs, and 116.3 mg/g (at pH 6-8) with nanosize La-doped magnetic graphene nanocomposites.168 Functionality of the La-doped composite was demonstrated for P-removal from river and sewage water. Adding polymeric coatings on magnetic cores (i.e., nano-magnetic polymers) (NMPs) has been shown to enhance stability of nano-dispersions and improve adsorption capacity. For example, a series of tetraethylenepentamine-functionalized core-shell nanomagnetic Fe3O4 (TEPA-Fe3O4-NMPs) demonstrated more effective P-removal when the polymer was used to stabilize the particles.169 A sandwiched 2D MXene-iron oxide (MXI) material, prepared by selectively exfoliating an Al layer followed by magnetic ferric oxide intercalation, exhibited high capture ability for trace phosphate sequestration.170 Compared with commercial adsorbents, the MXI nanocomposite 21 ACS Paragon Plus Environment


Page 22 of 61

demonstrated fast separation ability within 120 s and high treatment capacities of 2100 kg and 2400 kg per kg in simulated and real phosphate wastewaters. The high performance was explained by the structural morphology ferric oxide intercalation within the layers of MXene, widening the layer distance, and stimulating strong complexation of phosphate onto the embedded magnetic nanoparticles. Manganese oxides have been also explored for phosphate removal. Hydrous manganese oxide (HMO) is generally negatively charged at neutral pH and cannot effectively remove anionic pollutants such as phosphate. Pan et al., proposed a new strategy to enhance HMOmediated phosphate removal by immobilizing nano-HMO within a polystyrene anion exchanger (NS)171. The HMO@NS nanocomposite exhibited substantially enhanced phosphate removal in the presence of sulfate, chloride, and nitrate. The increased performance was attributed to the pHpzc shift from 6.2 for the bulky HMO to 10.5 for the encapsulated HMO nanoparticles, where HMO NPs are positively charged at neutral pH. The ammonium groups of NS also favor phosphate adsorption. Cerium oxide (CeO2) has received increasing interest as a promising sorbent for Premoval. The interest in CeO2 is due to its high surface charge density,172 rich functionalities, intrinsic surface reactivity, and rapid formation of cerium-phosphate complexes to their surface.173-174 CeO2 is a relatively inexpensive oxide and it has one of the lowest solubility in acidic and basic media among other oxides. Binary oxides with properly modulated ratios can display higher catalytic activities and sorption characteristics as compared to single component nanoparticles175. Su et al., developed a solvothermal process to synthesize a series of Ce/Zr binary oxide nanoadsorbents with high phosphate sorption characteristics. The highest phosphate adsorption capability of 112.2 mg/g was obtained for the mixed Ce0.8Zr0.2O2 oxide.176 Phosphate desorption was achieved by washing with a NaOH solution. Additional magnetic capabilities were obtained with mixed oxides core-shell CeO2-functionalized (Fe3O4@SiO2-CeO2)177 and (Fe3O4@SiO2@mCeO2)178 for achieving magnetic separation and recovery. Metal Oxide Frameworks (MOFs). Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are an emerging class of crystalline organic-inorganic hybrid materials with high porosity and tunable morphology.179 Their versatile three-dimensional framework with tunable pore size, interconnected pores and surface functionality provides a large specific surface area that can facilitate rapid and high 22 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 23 of 61 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


capacity adsorption for removal and decontamination applications. While most MOFs are investigated for gas sorption, investigations of their porous structure for the removal of pollutants from aqueous solutions are growing.180-181 To impart P-removal characteristics, MOFs have been modified with La, Zr or Fe, which provide specific active sites that can act as hosts receptors for P. Removal is attributed to electrostatic attraction between the La3+ and its complexation and ligand exchange reaction with H2PO4- in the pores of the MOFs structure with a maximum adsorption capacity of 142 mg/g from water.182 The adsorption kinetics followed a pseudosecond-order model and is pH dependent. The sorbent was recycled by elution with NaOH solution, achieving 90% regeneration after three adsorption-desorption cycles. Fe-based MOFs MIL-101 and NH2-MIL-101,71 and hollow magnetic Fe3O4@NH2-MIL-101(Fe) 183 demonstrated high sorption capacity for phosphate removal from eutrophic waters with maximum adsorption capacities of 107.7 and 124.4 mg·g−1, for MIL-101(Fe) and NH2-MIL-101(Fe), respectively. To prepare the Fe3O4@NH2-MIL-101(Fe), hollow porous magnetic (Fe3O4) was used as a template which was then coated with NH2-MIL-101(Fe) on its surface. The porous surface functionalized hollow structure has enabled selective removal and magnetic recovery of phosphates from aqueous solutions to concentrations of 45 ppb in 50 minutes.183 Zr-based MOFs were also demonstrated as highly selective adsorbents for the removal of P from water and urine.153 Another MOF, La-MOF-500, was designed to have a hierarchical micro/nano structure184 which provided a phosphate capture capacity of 173.8 mg P/g due to the high acessibility of lanthanum active sites. The La-MOF-500 was shown to remove phosphate to less than 10 µg P/L.

Polymeric materials. Surface charged polymeric materials can be used as sorbents on supporting materials to enhance adsorption properties and permeability of phosphate ions. Addition of polymeric coatings on magnetic cores (i.e., nano-magnetic polymers) (NMPs) has been shown to enhance stability of nano-dispersions and improve phosphate adsorption capacity of a series of tetraethylenepentamine-functionalized core-shell nanomagnetic Fe3O4 (TEPAFe3O4-NMPs)185. Polymers can also be used to prevent aggregation effects103 and prepare charged nanocomposites with increased removal efficiency. A nanocomposite based on magnetite nanoparticles (Fe3O4-NPs) immobilized on the surface of a cationic exchange polymer, C100 demonstrated an adsorption capacity of 4.9 mg PO4-P/g at pH 7.166 In another work, hydrated La(III) oxide (HLO) nanoclusters immobilized inside the pores of a polystyrene 23 ACS Paragon Plus Environment


Page 24 of 61

anion exchanger, D-201 exhibited enhanced phosphate adsorption in the presence of competing anions (Cl-, SO42-, NO3-, HCO3-, and SiO32-), with 2−4 times greater performance than a commercial Fe(III) oxide-based nanocomposite HFO-201.186 Other polymeric materials have been used as sorbents in adsorptive filtration media obtained by coating a filter or column materials with polymers, so that it can act simultaneously as a separation media and an adsorbent. Du et al. reported a functional polymeric ligand exchanger (PLE) for the removal of nitrate and phosphate from water down to 0.1 ppm, obtained by incorporation of La3+ into a Dowex ion-exchange resin.187 The column was regenerated by elution with 0.1 M hydrochloric acid. In another study, mixed metal oxide (Fe-Ti bimetal oxide) were coated on sulfonated polymer beads for enhanced phosphorus removal from membrane bioreactor effluents188. The adsorption capacity of the coated beads was substantially enhanced upon Ti doping, which may be due to the presence of more positively charged surfaces. The selectivity for phosphate ions against Cl−, NO3−, and SO42− was high, with a selectivity factor higher than 25, but less selective against bicarbonate and organic materials. A commonly used biopolymer, chitosan that contains multiple reactive functional groups has been used to prepare polymeric composites, beads and resins for phosphate removal, Examples include: polymeric composites with chitosan and polyvinyl alcohol and polyethylene glycol (PEG/chitosan and PVA/chitosan),189 chitosan beads cross‐linked with glutaraldehyde (GA) and epichlorohydrin (EP),190 chitosan-melamine-glutaraldehyde resins (QCMGR)191 and chitosan supported bentonite (CSBent) with multivalent metal ions like Zr4+, Fe3+ and Ca2+).192 In addition of polyelectrolytes, a variety of polymeric hydrogels have been developed for removal of contaminants through electrostatic interactions. Fast removal of ammonium ions in a pH range from 3 to 8 was achieved using a hydrogel consisting of polyvinyl alcohol, acrylic acid (AA) and tourmaline (Tm) with an entangled tri-dimensional network.193 Adsorption of both ammonium and phosphate ions in a pH range between 4 to 9 was demonstrated using a protein-grafted poly(potassium acrylate)/polyvinyl alcohol (FP-g-PKA/PVA) hydrogel produced through graft copolymerization.194 Several hybrid polymer nanocomposites have been reported for phosphate removal,

e.g.

(HPN-Pr)

biofilm

reactor,195

polyaniline/Ni0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4

magnetic

nanocomposite,196 alginate/Fe(III) capsules197 and alginate beads.198-199 Examples of commonly used sorbents with their sorption characteristics are presented in Table 2.


Page 25 of 61 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


Supramolecular receptors. Supramolecular receptors engineered to bind and release nutrients are a growing class of materials with promising P-binding properties that could be incorporated in porous sorbents. Several types of P-binding receptors have been reported. Johnson, Hayley and collaborators have synthesized an anion-modulated supramolecular switch that selectively binds dihydrogen phosphate, H2PO4-.200 The receptor consists of a bisurea-based anion bearing a bipyridine core unit that is capable to preferentially coordinate H2PO4-. Flood and collaborators have reported an acid-based multistate switching of organophosphates in cyanostar complexes, which could be used in the future as potential receptors for the binding and release of organophosphates.201 Phosphates oligomerization in cyanostar macrocycles induced formation of stackable higher order assemblies.65 The principle concept can be expanded in the future to create molecular assemblies for phosphates recognition upon complexation. Other materials such as high surface mesoporous cross-linked β-cyclodextrin polymers developed by Dichtel et. al.202 for removal of organic micropollutants featuring easier and cheaper regeneration could be adapted to P-containing compounds with potential for low-energy, flow-through water purification. Pierre and collaborators developed a gadolinium-based supramolecular receptor that has the ability to catch and release phosphate from water.78 The complex has two open coordination sites that bind phosphate in a pH-dependent manner, providing opportunities for the design of pH-dependent catch-and-release systems for the removal of phosphate from surface waters. In water at neutral pH the complex binds phosphate with high affinity (Ka = 1.3 × 104) via the formation of a ternary complex in which one phosphate replaces both inner-sphere water molecules. Under strong acidic conditions, the complex releases phosphate (Figure 4). This pH variability has been used as a recycling scheme, demonstrating reusability for at least 10 cycles. The complex was selective for phosphate over other anions, including HCO3–, HCO2–, CH3CO2–, SO42–, NO3–, NO2–, BrO3–, AsO4–, F–, Cl–, and Br– and, to a lesser extent for ClO3–.



Page 26 of 61

Figure 4. Representation of the pH-dependent recycling scheme for catch and release of phosphate

using

Gd-TREN-MAM

complex

(gadolinium-2,2',2''-(((nitrilotris(ethane-2,1-

diyl))tris(azanediyl))tris(carbonyl))tris(4-oxo-4H-pyran-3-olate).78 Reprinted (adapted) with permission from (Harris, S. M.; Nguyen, J. T.; Pailloux, S. L.; Mansergh, J. P.; Dresel, M. J.; Swanholm, T. B.; Gao, T.; Pierre, V. C. Gadolinium Complex for the Catch and Release of Phosphate

from

Water.

Environ.

Sci.

Technol.

2017,

51

(8),

4549-4558,

DOI

10.1021/acs.est.6b05815). Copyright 2017 The American Chemical Society.

Figure 5 provides a summary of the different types of nanomaterials that can be used as sorbents for P removal and their desired properties. These include but are not limited to C-based and activated carbonaceous materials like graphene and carbon nanotubes (CNTs), zeolites, nanostructured metal oxides and hydroxides, MOFs, and functional polymeric materials.


Page 27 of 61 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


Figure 5. Summary of commonly used material sorbents and their properties for P removal.


ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47

Page 28 of 61

Table 2. Examples of adsorbents with their characteristics for P adsorption. Adsorbent

Surface

Capacity

Adsorbent

Area

(mg /g)

dosage (g/L)

pH

Equilibrium

%

Time

Removal

Regeneration

Ref.

2

(m /g) Coir-pith activated carbon

727.4

7.7

4

6.0

3h

97

---

203

Magnetic iron oxide

82.2

5.0

0.6

6.0

12 h

85

1 M NaOH

204

Magnetite (Fe3O4)

---

27.2

1.0

7.0

24 h

---

1 M NaOH

205

Fe−Zr binary oxide

106.2

13.7

1

4.0

2h

86

0.1 M NaOH

206

Iron oxide nanoparticle-chitosan

2.4

0.06

30

5-9

12 h

---

5mM NaOH

207

Nanobimetal ferrites CuFe2O4

69.1

13.5

3

2.6

2h

99.9

0.001N NH4OH

92

Amorphous zirconium oxide

327

99.0

0.1

6.2

8h

99

0.1 M NaOH

208

Hydrous niobium oxide

46

15

2

2

4h

>88

H2O (pHs 5 and 12)

209

Fe3O4@PAH–Gu

---

3.7-4

0.5

5-10

24 h

>80

10 mM NaCl

210

ZrO2·nH2O

---

66

2

2

8h

99

H2O (pHs 5 and 12)

211

core–shell Fe3O4@LDHs

133

36.9

2

3

1h

>85

---

212

3D Graphene–nanoparticle aerogel

210

350

0.2

99

3M NaOH

219

Modified iron oxide-based sorbents

140

38.8

1-15

7

3 weeks

---

0.1M NaOH

220

PEI impregnated MOF (UiO-66)

1157

78.4

0.25

5

20 min

80

---

221

Cubic zeolitic imidazolate framework-8

---

38.2

0.5

5

30 min

>90

---

222

Porous MgO

181

236

0.1

5

3h

---

---

223


Page 29 of 61 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47


34.7

161

0.3

7

2h

72.8

---

32

76.4

8.8

0.6

6

48 h

---

---

224

lanthanum(III)-immobilized aminated lignin

85.8

65.8

1.25

6

1h

94

5 M NaOH

Poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) hydrogel beads

---

11.5

50

3-9

480 min

90

0.1 M HCl

226

Zirconium-loaded magnetic interpenetrating

---

50.8

0.25

6.5

20 h

79

0.05 M NaOH

227

Cross-linked chitosan bead

---

52.1

0.4

8.5

30 min

---

---

228

Brown algae modified by molybdate (algae–

1.44

149.3

10

5

60 min

98.8

recycled without any

229

Mesoporous magnesium oxide modified diatomite Zirconium(IV) loaded lignocellulosic butanol residue (LBR-Zr)

225

network chitosan/poly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogels

Mo)

modifications

Ferric oxides loading on granular biochar

219

0.96

20

---

24 h

---

---

33

Mg/Al-LDHs modified biochar

12.3

81.8

2.5

3

60 min

> 99

---

34

Silicate material (CSH@SiO2@MgO)

33.9

---

0.4

8

1h

93.9

HCl (1 mol)

35

Metal (hydro-)oxide coated sands

3.5

0.32

5

7

24 h

∼100

--

36

Fe/Mn composites (TS-N)

68.9

26

1

5

60 min

---

---

84

Copper-substituted zeolites (Cu-ZSM-5)

376

33

30

8.6

1.5 h

98.9

NaCl (10 g/L)

85

Amphoteric straw cellulose (ASC) adsorbent

0.57

38.6

2

4-7

30 min

---

---

86

Core-shell bio-ceramic/Zn-LDHs composites

---

0.36-0.77

100

7

8-14 h

∼72

5M NaCl+0.1M NaOH

87

synthetic hydrotalcite

600

47.3

---

7.8

24 h

---

10%NaCl+3% NaOH

88

La(III)-modified zeolite adsorbent (LZA)

---

24.6

0.8

6

3.5 h

99.5

0.8 M NaCl

89



Page 30 of 61

MATERIALS FOR ORGANOPHOSPHATE PESTICIDES (OPPS) REMOVAL

While this review focused primarily on materials for the removal of inorganic P, adsorbents for removal of organic P are also of interest as many P-containing compounds such as the class of organophosphorus pesticides (OPPs) are used widely in agriculture. Adsorption of organophosphates (paraoxon, diazinon, and structurally related compounds) was achieved on porous hierarchical organosilicate sorbents such as diethylbenzene-bridged organosilicate.28 Gu et al., fabricated Zr-based MOFs of UiO-67 and showed effective adsorption and removal of OPPs, glyphosate (GP) and glufosinate (GF), from aqueous solutions.230 Nearly 100 % adsorption in 1 h of OPs reported with humic acid-modified silica gel used as adsorbents for the removal of OPs in hexane. 231 Adsorption capacities of 456 and 57.1 mg/g OPP dimethoate was achieved by adsorption onto Au nanospheres and nanorods, respectively.232. Nanostructured Ti/Ce oxides and their composites enabled effective reactive adsorption of toxic OP parathion methyl and dimethyl methylphosphonate.233 OP flame retardants (OPFRs) removal from water was reported using ACs.234 through a sorption process involving hydrophobic, electrostatic, hydrogen bonding, and π-π interactions. The ACs was successfully regenerated and reused at least four times with stable sorption capacity. Other studies report the use of NaX zeolite for adsorption of trimethyl phosphate (TMP),235 graphene-coated silica for adsorption of eleven different OPPs,236 cellulose/graphene composite (CGC) for triazine,

237

graphene-coated SiO2

NPS for phenanthrene,238 graphene@SiO2@Fe3O4 nanocomposite for the extraction of OPs residues (malathion, chlorpyrifos, isocarbophos, fenamiphos, profenofos) in environmental water,239 amino-substituted p-tert-butylcalix[4]arene-based magnetic sporopollenin, CalixEPPTMS-MS (4) for the removal of chlorpyrifos and diazinon,240 and the adsorption of organophosphate esters (OPEs) on CNTs.241 A MOF/GO hybrid nanocomposite (UiO-67/GO) enabled high-affinity capture of OPPs.242 Figure 6 shows an example of fabrication procedure of a magnetic MOF-based adsorbent, Fe3O4@SiO2@UiO-67243 via a layer by layer assembly approach and its application for the simultaneous recognition, detection and removal of glyphosate. A sorbent prepared by immobilizing zirconia and magnetite Fe3O4 NPs in chitosan enabled rapid adsorption of OPs from juice and water samples.244 Activated carbon derived from sieve-like cellulose/graphene oxide composites (ACCE/G)245, and poly(ionic liquid) immobilized


Page 31 of 61 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


magnetic NPs (PIL-MNPs) synthesized via co-polymerization of 1-vinyl-3-hexylimidazoliumbased ionic liquid were also reported as effective sorbents for the removal of OPPs.234

Figure 6. A schematic illustration for the fabrication of the Fe3O4@- SiO2@UiO-67 MOF-based adsorbent, and the mechanism of adsorption for the removal of OPPs.243 Reprinted (adapted) with permission from (Yang, Q.; Wang, J.; Chen, X.; Yang, W.; Pei, H.; Hu, N.; Li, Z.; Suo, Y.; Li, T.; Wang, J. The Simultaneous Detection and Removal of Organophosphorus Pesticides by a Novel Zr-MOF Based Smart Adsorbent. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6 (5), 2184-2192, DOI 10.1039/c7ta08399h). Copyright 2018 The Royal Society of Chemistry.

CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE OUTLOOK One of the most challenging sustainability problems faced by society today is the quality and safety of water resources. Application of P-based fertilizers and pesticides, and their excessive accumulation by ecosystems has generated increased occurrence of water eutrophication which generates an overgrowth of harmful algal blooms and degradation of water quality. The management and control of P-containing compounds has important environmental and economic implications. Over 50% of the P used in fertilizers (~ 8 million tons per year) is lost through soil leaching and erosion from farms.246 Moreover, food wastes accounts for 1 million tons loss of P. Nationally, more than 80,000 miles of streams and rivers are impaired due to nutrient pollution, which is considered a substantial under-estimate because only 25% of these water bodies have been assessed. Similarly, over 2.5 million acres of U.S. lakes, reservoirs, and ponds are impaired due to nutrient pollution, but only ~43 % of these areas have been assessed.246 The prevention of



Page 32 of 61

algal growth by removing the excess of P in freshwater and marine water would be beneficial in securing the safety of water ecosystems and reducing the cost of water treatment processes. Employment of P-capturing systems in regions with oversupply and the treatment of P-rich industrial effluents may help both reduce their damaging effects and create a source of recycled P. Recent technological advances promise improved efficiency of phosphate rock mining247 However, the inefficient use of P-based products in agricultural activities calls for improved fertilization approaches.248-249 It was suggested that agricultural activities can take advantage more efficiently of the P already present in the soil.250 Breeding of crops with lowered fertilization requirements or the development of fertilizers that can release P locally can also minimize the need for P and limit runoff in water bodies.251 This review summarized emerging classes of nanoporous materials that can be used as sorbents to capture, remove and recover P-containing compounds released during industrial and agricultural activities. Reducing the amount of these species in waste or run-off streams could result in i) improved water quality, ii) minimized risk, causes and consequences of water eutrophication, iii) provide opportunities for recycling and reuse of P-containing nutrients and fertilizers and iv) conservation of the limited P-resources. Nanoporous sorbents can be used to develop more efficient high performance water filtration and purification technologies for the recycling and management of P-containing nutrients in the environment. Their high sorption capacity can be used in the future to develop decision support systems for field-monitoring and rapid screening of region-specific P-content and determine a risk factor for implementing pollution prevention measures related to the excessive presence of these species. Recently reported supramolecular receptors that have shown to selectively bind phosphate at neutral pH and releasing it under acidic conditions78 could be grafted onto nanoporous sorbents to enhance P-removal capacity and increase selectivity. This area of research is still in its infancy and we anticipate that future work will study systems and devices based on nanoporous sorbents, some of which may contain selective receptors incorporated within or grafted on their surface. Preparation of new materials and a closer investigation of the adsorption mechanisms in realistic conditions are also needed to improve efficiency and speed up implementation of these new technologies in the environmental and agricultural fields. Other considerations are the cost, availability and large scale manufacturing of the adsorbent materials and that of the P-binding receptors for large scale applications. Research is also needed to establish stability and the 32 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 33 of 61 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


potential leaching risk of the adsorbent, its recyclability and reuse, and to evaluate the quality of the P recovered from separation and filtration operations to permit further reuse in agriculture. In addition to strategies for the recovery of P from wastewaters, there is growing interest to identifying alternative fertilizers and nutrient delivery systems.248 Popular approaches include the development of nutrient-based or nutrient-loaded nanomaterials that are engineered to provide slow and localized real-time release of nutrients. Increased interest is expected in designing nanoporous materials with controlled pore size, connectivity and functionality to increase nutrient loading, as well as developing more effective release mechanisms for the recovery and reuse. Future development of green and environmentally friendly sorbents and nutrient delivery systems is also of interest, as well as considerations of recyclability and reuse. There is also a need in the future for engineering solutions to integrate these materials into filtration membranes, columns and separation systems and to test these systems in realworld conditions in order to demonstrate efficiency and enable practical implementation. Successful implementation of these materials can reduce further contamination of water streams and potentially increase efficiency of agricultural practices.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work was supported in part by NSF grant #1610281. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Funding provided by the New York State Pollution Prevention Institute through a grant from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation is also acknowledged. Any opinions, results, findings and/or interpretations of data contained herein are the responsibility of author(s) and do not necessarily represent the opinions, interpretations or policy of the State.



Page 34 of 61

REFERENCES (1)

Elser, J. J. Phosphorus: A Limiting Nutrient for Humanity? Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2012,

23 (6), 833-838, DOI 10.1016/j.copbio.2012.03.001. (2)

Smith, V. H.; Schindler, D. W. Eutrophication Science: Where Do We Go from Here?

Trends Ecol. Evol. 2009, 24 (4), 201-207, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2008.11.009. (3)

Elser, J.; Bennett, E. A Broken Biogeochemical Cycle. Nature 2011, 478, 29, DOI

10.1038/478029a. (4)

Withers, P. J. A.; Elser, J. J.; Hilton, J.; Ohtake, H.; Schipper, W. J.; van Dijkf, K. C.

Greening the Global Phosphorus Cycle: How Green Chemistry Can Help Achieve Planetary P Sustainability. Green Chem. 2015, 17 (4), 2087-2099, DOI 10.1039/c4gc02445a. (5)

Ulrich, A. E.; Frossard, E. On the History of a Reoccurring Concept: Phosphorus

Scarcity. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 490, 694-707, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.04.050. (6)

Childers, D. L.; Corman, J.; Edwards, M.; Elser, J. J. Sustainability Challenges of

Phosphorus and Food: Solutions from Closing the Human Phosphorus Cycle. BioScience 2011, 61 (2), 117-124, DOI 10.1525/bio.2011.61.2.6. (7)

Vikrant, K.; Kim, K. H.; Ok, Y. S.; Tsang, D. C. W.; Tsang, Y. F.; Giri, B. S.; Singh, R.

S. Engineered/Designer Biochar for the Removal of Phosphate in Water and Wastewater. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 616, 1242-1260, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.193. (8) and

Cordell, D.; Drangert, J.-O.; White, S. The Story of Phosphorus: Global Food Security Food

for

Thought.

Global

Environ.

Chang.

2009,

19

(2),

292-305,

DOI

10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.10.009. (9)

Veneklaas, E. J.; Lambers, H.; Bragg, J.; Finnegan, P. M.; Lovelock, C. E.; Plaxton, W.

C.; Price, C. A.; Scheible, W.-R.; Shane, M. W.; White, P. J.; Raven, J. A. Opportunities for Improving Phosphorus-Use Efficiency in Crop Plants. New Phytol. 2012, 195 (2), 306-320, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04190.x. (10)

Bennett, E. M.; Carpenter, S. R.; Caraco, N. F. Human Impact on Erodable Phosphorus

and Eutrophication: A Global Perspectiveincreasing Accumulation of Phosphorus in Soil


Page 35 of 61 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


Threatens Rivers, Lakes, and Coastal Oceans with Eutrophication. BioScience 2001, 51 (3), 227234, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0227:hioepa]2.0.co;2. (11)

Penuelas, J.; Poulter, B.; Sardans, J.; Ciais, P.; van der Velde, M.; Bopp, L.; Boucher, O.;

Godderis, Y.; Hinsinger, P.; Llusia, J.; Nardin, E.; Vicca, S.; Obersteiner, M.; Janssens, I. A. Human-Induced Nitrogen-Phosphorus Imbalances Alter Natural and Managed Ecosystems across the Globe. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2934, DOI 10.1038/ncomms3934. (12)

Gilbert, N. Environment: The Disappearing Nutrient. Nature News 2009, 461 (7265),

716-718. (13)

Cordell, D.; White, S. Peak Phosphorus: Clarifying the Key Issues of a Vigorous Debate

About Long-Term Phosphorus Security. Sustainability 2011, 3 (10), 2027-2049, DOI 10.3390/su3102027. (14)

Neset, T.-S. S.; Cordell, D. Global Phosphorus Scarcity: Identifying Synergies for a

Sustainable Future. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2012, 92 (1), 2-6, DOI 10.1002/jsfa.4650. (15)

Sharpley, A.; Daniel, T. C.; Sims, J. T.; Pote, D. H. Determining Environmentally Sound

Soil Phosphorus Levels. J. Soil Water Conserv. 1996, 51 (2), 160-166. (16)

Puckett, L. J. Identifying the Major Sources of Nutrient Water Pollution. Environ. Sci.

Technol. 1995, 29 (9), 408A-414A, DOI 10.1021/es00009a001. (17)

Carpenter, S. R.; Caraco, N. F.; Correll, D. L.; Howarth, R. W.; Sharpley, A. N.; Smith,

V. H. Nonpoint Pollution of Surface Waters with Phosphorus and Nitrogen. Ecol. Appl. 1998, 8 (3), 559-568, DOI 10.1890/1051-0761(1998)008[0559:nposww]2.0.co;2. (18)

Devey, D. G.; Harkness, N. The Significance of Man-Made Sources of Phosphorus:

Detergents and Sewage. Water Res. 1973, 7 (1), 35-54, DOI 10.1016/0043-1354(73)90151-6. (19)

Gomes de Quevedo, C. M.; da Silva Paganini, W. Detergents as a Source of Phosphorus

in Sewage: The Current Situation in Brazil. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2015, 227 (1), 14, DOI 10.1007/s11270-015-2700-3. (20)

Suh, S.; Yee, S. Phosphorus Use-Efficiency of Agriculture and Food System in the Us.

Chemosphere 2011, 84 (6), 806-813, DOI 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.01.051. (21)

Jarvie, H. P.; Sharpley, A. N.; Spears, B.; Buda, A. R.; May, L.; Kleinman, P. J. A. Water

Quality Remediation Faces Unprecedented Challenges from “Legacy Phosphorus”. Environ. Sci Technol. 2013, 47 (16), 8997-8998, DOI 10.1021/es403160a.



(22)

Page 36 of 61

Darch, T.; Blackwell, M. S. A.; Hawkins, J. M. B.; Haygarth, P. M.; Chadwick, D. A

Meta-Analysis of Organic and Inorganic Phosphorus in Organic Fertilizers, Soils, and Water: Implications for Water Quality. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 44 (19), 2172-2202, DOI 10.1080/10643389.2013.790752. (23)

Smith, V. H. Eutrophication of Freshwater and Coastal Marine Ecosystems a Global

Problem. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2003, 10 (2), 126-139, DOI 10.1065/espr2002.12.142. (24)

Dodds, W. K.; Smith, V. H. Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Eutrophication in Streams. Inland

Waters 2016, 6 (2), 155-164, DOI 10.5268/iw-6.2.909. (25)

Anderson, D. M.; Glibert, P. M.; Burkholder, J. M. Harmful Algal Blooms and

Eutrophication: Nutrient Sources, Composition, and Consequences. Estuaries 2002, 25 (4), 704726, DOI 10.1007/bf02804901. (26)

Sellner, K. G.; Doucette, G. J.; Kirkpatrick, G. J. Harmful Algal Blooms: Causes,

Impacts and Detection. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2003, 30 (7), 383-406, DOI 10.1007/s10295-003-0074-9. (27) Finite

Scholz, R. W.; Ulrich, A. E.; Eilittä, M.; Roy, A. Sustainable Use of Phosphorus: A Resource.

Sci.

Total

Environ.

2013,

461-462,

799-803,

DOI

10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.05.043. (28)

Johnson, B. J.; Malanoski, A. P.; Leska, I. A.; Melde, B. J.; Taft, J. R.; Dinderman, M.

A.; Deschamps, J. R. Adsorption of Organophosphates from Solution by Porous Organosilicates: Capillary Phase-Separation. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2014, 195, 154-160, DOI 10.1016/j.micromeso.2014.04.031. (29)

Wei, Z.; Bo, Q.; Chun‐Hsing, C.; H., F. A. High‐Fidelity Multistate Switching with

Anion–Anion and Acid–Anion Dimers of Organophosphates in Cyanostar Complexes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56 (42), 13083-13087, DOI 10.1002/anie.201707869. (30)

Gavette, J. V.; Mills, N. S.; Zakharov, L. N.; Johnson, C. A.; Johnson, D. W.; Haley, M.

M. An Anion-Modulated Three-Way Supramolecular Switch That Selectively Binds Dihydrogen Phosphate,

H2PO4−.

Angew.

Chem.

Int.

Ed.

2013,

52

(39),

10270-10274,

DOI

10.1002/anie.201302929. (31)

Huang, W.; Zhu, Y.; Tang, J.; Yu, X.; Wang, X.; Li, D.; Zhang, Y. Lanthanum-Doped

Ordered Mesoporous Hollow Silica Spheres as Novel Adsorbents for Efficient Phosphate Removal. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2 (23), 8839-8848, DOI 10.1039/c4ta00326h. 36 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 37 of 61 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


(32)

Xia, P.; Wang, X.; Wang, X.; Song, J.; Wang, H.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, J. Struvite

Crystallization Combined Adsorption of Phosphate and Ammonium from Aqueous Solutions by Mesoporous Mgo-Loaded Diatomite. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2016, 506, 220227, DOI 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2016.05.101. (33)

Ren, J.; Li, N.; Li, L.; An, J.-K.; Zhao, L.; Ren, N.-Q. Granulation and Ferric Oxides

Loading Enable Biochar Derived from Cotton Stalk to Remove Phosphate from Water. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 178, 119-125, DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.09.071. (34)

Li, R.; Wang, J. J.; Zhou, B.; Awasthi, M. K.; Ali, A.; Zhang, Z.; Gaston, L. A.; Lahori,

A. H.; Mahar, A. Enhancing Phosphate Adsorption by Mg/Al Layered Double Hydroxide Functionalized Biochar with Different Mg/Al Ratios. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 559, 121-129, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.151. (35)

Si, Q.; Zhu, Q.; Xing, Z. Design and Synthesis of a Novel Silicate Material from Red

Mud for Simultaneous Removal of Nitrogen and Phosphorus in Wastewater. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5 (12), 11422-11432, DOI 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b02538. (36)

Huang, Y.; Yang, J.-K.; Keller, A. A. Removal of Arsenic and Phosphate from Aqueous

Solution by Metal (Hydr-)Oxide Coated Sand. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2014, 2 (5), 1128-1138, DOI 10.1021/sc400484s. (37)

Rittmann, B. E.; Mayer, B.; Westerhoff, P.; Edwards, M. Capturing the Lost Phosphorus.

Chemosphere 2011, 84 (6), 846-853, DOI 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.02.001. (38)

Sharpley, A.; Richards, P.; Herron, S.; Baker, D. Case Study Comparison between

Litigated and Voluntary Nutrient Management Strategies. J. Soil Water Conserv. 2012, 67 (5), 442-450, DOI 10.2489/jswc.67.5.442. (39)

Stow, C. A.; Cha, Y.; Johnson, L. T.; Confesor, R.; Richards, R. P. Long-Term and

Seasonal Trend Decomposition of Maumee River Nutrient Inputs to Western Lake Erie. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49 (6), 3392-3400, DOI 10.1021/es5062648. (40)

Dale, V. H.; Boynton, W.; Kling, C. L.; Conley, D. J.; Meyer, J. L.; Crumpton, W.;

Sanders, J.; Stallworth, H.; David, M.; Armitage, T.; Gilbert, D.; Wangsness, D.; Bianchi, T.; Howarth, R. W.; Blumberg, A.; Lowrance, R.; Mankin, K.; Sharpley, A. N.; Opaluch, J.; Simpson, T. W.; Paerl, H.; Snyder, C. S.; Reckhow, K.; Wright, D., Nutrient Fate, Transport, and Sources. In Hypoxia in the Northern Gulf of Mexico, Eds. Springer New York: New York, NY, 2010, pp 51-109, DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-89686-1. 37 ACS Paragon Plus Environment


(41)

Page 38 of 61

Brodie, J. E.; Devlin, M.; Haynes, D.; Waterhouse, J. Assessment of the Eutrophication

Status of the Great Barrier Reef Lagoon (Australia). Biogeochemistry 2011, 106 (2), 281-302, DOI 10.1007/s10533-010-9542-2. (42)

Conley, D. J. Save the Baltic Sea. Nature 2012, 486, 463, DOI 10.1038/486463a.

(43)

Smith, V. H.; Joye, S. B.; Howarth, R. W. Eutrophication of Freshwater and Marine

Ecosystems.

Limnol.

Oceanogr.

2006,

51

(1part2),

351-355,

DOI

10.4319/lo.2006.51.1_part_2.0351. (44)

Hautier, Y.; Niklaus, P. A.; Hector, A. Competition for Light Causes Plant Biodiversity

Loss after Eutrophication. Science 2009, 324 (5927), 636-638, DOI 10.1126/science.1169640. (45)

Diaz, R. J.; Rosenberg, R. Spreading Dead Zones and Consequences for Marine

Ecosystems. Science 2008, 321 (5891), 926-929, DOI 10.1126/science.1156401. (46)

Vonlanthen, P.; Bittner, D.; Hudson, A. G.; Young, K. A.; Müller, R.; Lundsgaard-

Hansen, B.; Roy, D.; Di Piazza, S.; Largiader, C. R.; Seehausen, O. Eutrophication Causes Speciation Reversal in Whitefish Adaptive Radiations. Nature 2012, 482, 357, DOI 10.1038/nature10824 (47)

Razzaque, M. S. Phosphate Toxicity: New Insights into an Old Problem. Clin. Sci. 2011,

120 (3), 91-97, DOI 10.1042/cs20100377. (48)

Davis, T. W.; Bullerjahn, G. S.; Tuttle, T.; McKay, R. M.; Watson, S. B. Effects of

Increasing Nitrogen and Phosphorus Concentrations on Phytoplankton Community Growth and Toxicity During Planktothrix Blooms in Sandusky Bay, Lake Erie. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49 (12), 7197-7207, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.5b00799. (49)

Jochimsen , E. M.; Carmichael , W. W.; An , J.; Cardo , D. M.; Cookson , S. T.; Holmes ,

C. E. M.; Antunes , M. B.; de Melo Filho , D. A.; Lyra , T. M.; Barreto , V. S. T.; Azevedo , S. M. F. O.; Jarvis , W. R. Liver Failure and Death after Exposure to Microcystins at a Hemodialysis Center in Brazil. New Engl. J. Med. 1998, 338 (13), 873-878, DOI 10.1056/nejm199803263381304. (50)

Pitois, S.; Jackson, M. H.; Wood, B. J. Sources of the Eutrophication Problems

Associated with Toxic Algae: An Overview. J. Environ. Health 2001, 64 (5), 25-32.


Page 39 of 61 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


(51)

Falconer, I. R. An Overview of Problems Caused by Toxic Blue–Green Algae

(Cyanobacteria) in Drinking and Recreational Water. Environ. Toxicol. 1999, 14 (1), 5-12, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1522-7278(199902)14:13.0.CO;2-0. (52)

Lopez-Rodas, V.; Maneiro, E.; Lanzarot, M. P.; Perdigones, N.; Costas, E. Mass Wildlife

Mortality Due to Cyanobacteria in the Doñana National Park, Spain. Vet. Rec. 2008, 162 (10), 317-318, DOI 10.1136/vr.162.10.317. (53)

Dodds, W. K.; Bouska, W. W.; Eitzmann, J. L.; Pilger, T. J.; Pitts, K. L.; Riley, A. J.;

Schloesser, J. T.; Thornbrugh, D. J. Eutrophication of U.S. Freshwaters: Analysis of Potential Economic Damages. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43 (1), 12-19, DOI 10.1021/es801217q. (54)

Schindler, D. W. Recent Advances in the Understanding and Management of

Eutrophication.

Limnol.

Oceanogr.

2006,

51

(1part2),

356-363,

DOI

10.4319/lo.2006.51.1_part_2.0356. (55)

Conley, D. J.; Paerl, H. W.; Howarth, R. W.; Boesch, D. F.; Seitzinger, S. P.; Havens, K.

E.; Lancelot, C.; Likens, G. E. Controlling Eutrophication: Nitrogen and Phosphorus. Science 2009, 323 (5917), 1014-1015, DOI 10.1126/science.1167755. (56)

Cornel, P.; Schaum, C. Phosphorus Recovery from Wastewater: Needs, Technologies and

Costs. Water Sci. Technol. 2009, 59 (6), 1069-1076, DOI 10.2166/wst.2009.045. (57)

Parfitt, J.; Barthel, M.; Macnaughton, S. Food Waste within Food Supply Chains:

Quantification and Potential for Change to 2050. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2010, 365 (1554), 3065-3081, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2010.0126. (58)

Penn, C.; Chagas, I.; Klimeski, A.; Lyngsie, G. A Review of Phosphorus Removal

Structures: How to Assess and Compare Their Performance. Water 2017, 9 (8), 583, DOI 10.3390/w9080583. (59)

Sengupta, S.; Nawaz, T.; Beaudry, J. Nitrogen and Phosphorus Recovery from

Wastewater. Curr. Pollut. Rep. 2015, 1 (3), 155-166, DOI 10.1007/s40726-015-0013-1. (60)

Karapınar, N. Application of Natural Zeolite for Phosphorus and Ammonium Removal

from

Aqueous

Solutions.

J.

Hazard.

Mater.

2009,

170

(2),

1186-1191,

DOI

10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.05.094. (61)

Aguilar, M. I.; Sáez, J.; Lloréns, M.; Soler, A.; Ortuño, J. F. Nutrient Removal and

Sludge Production in the Coagulation–Flocculation Process. Water Res. 2002, 36 (11), 29102919, DOI 10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00508-5. 39 ACS Paragon Plus Environment


(62)

Page 40 of 61

Karapinar, N.; Hoffmann, E.; Hahn, H. H. P-Recovery by Secondary Nucleation and

Growth of Calcium Phosphates on Magnetite Mineral. Water Res. 2006, 40 (6), 1210-1216, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2005.12.041. (63)

Moriyama, K.; Kojima, T.; Minawa, Y.; Matsumoto, S.; Nakamachi, K. Development of

Artificial Seed Crystal for Crystallization of Calcium Phosphate. Environ. Technol. 2001, 22 (11), 1245-1252, DOI 10.1080/09593330.2001.9619163. (64)

Moreno, E. C.; Varughese, K. Crystal Growth of Calcium Apatites from Dilute Solutions.

J. Cryst. Growth 1981, 53 (1), 20-30, DOI 10.1016/0022-0248(81)90052-X. (65)

Fatila, E. M.; Pink, M.; Twum, E. B.; Karty, J. A.; Flood, A. H. Phosphate–Phosphate

Oligomerization Drives Higher Order Co-Assemblies with Stacks of Cyanostar Macrocycles. Chem. Sci. 2018, 9 (11), 2863–2872, DOI 10.1039/C7SC05290A. (66)

Bunce, J. T.; Ndam, E.; Ofiteru, I. D.; Moore, A.; Graham, D. W. A Review of

Phosphorus Removal Technologies and Their Applicability to Small-Scale Domestic Wastewater Treatment Systems. Front. Environ. Sci. 2018, 6 (8), DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2018.00008. (67)

De Gisi, S.; Lofrano, G.; Grassi, M.; Notarnicola, M. Characteristics and Adsorption

Capacities of Low-Cost Sorbents for Wastewater Treatment: A Review. Sustain. Mater. Technol. 2016, 9, 10-40, DOI 10.1016/j.susmat.2016.06.002. (68)

Pan, B.; Wu, J.; Pan, B.; Lv, L.; Zhang, W.; Xiao, L.; Wang, X.; Tao, X.; Zheng, S.

Development of Polymer-Based Nanosized Hydrated Ferric Oxides (HFOs) for Enhanced Phosphate Removal from Waste Effluents. Water Res. 2009, 43 (17), 4421-4429, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2009.06.055. (69)

Onyango, M. S.; Kuchar, D.; Kubota, M.; Matsuda, H. Adsorptive Removal of Phosphate

Ions from Aqueous Solution Using Synthetic Zeolite. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2007, 46 (3), 894900, DOI 10.1021/ie060742m. (70)

McKay, G.; Blair, H. S.; Gardner, J. R. Adsorption of Dyes on Chitin. I. Equilibrium

Studies. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1982, 27 (8), 3043-3057, DOI 10.1002/app.1982.070270827. (71)

Xie, Q.; Li, Y.; Lv, Z.; Zhou, H.; Yang, X.; Chen, J.; Guo, H. Effective Adsorption and

Removal of Phosphate from Aqueous Solutions and Eutrophic Water by Fe-Based MOFs of MIL-101. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7 (1), 3316, DOI 10.1038/s41598-017-03526-x.


Page 41 of 61 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


(72) Using

Zeng, L.; Li, X.; Liu, J. Adsorptive Removal of Phosphate from Aqueous Solutions Iron

Oxide

Tailings.

Water

Res.

2004,

38

(5),

1318-1326,

DOI

10.1016/j.watres.2003.12.009. (73)

Yaghoobi-Rahni, S.; Rezaei, B.; Mirghaffari, N. Bentonite Surface Modification and

Characterization for High Selective Phosphate Adsorption from Aqueous Media and Its Application for Wastewater Treatments. J. Water Reuse Desal. 2017, 7 (2), 175-186, DOI 10.2166/wrd.2016.212. (74)

Masindi, V.; Gitari, W. M.; Pindihama, K. G. Synthesis of Cryptocrystalline

Magnesite/Bentonite Clay Composite and Its Application for Removal of Phosphate from Municipal

Wastewaters.

Environ.

Technol.

2016,

37

(5),

603-612,

DOI

10.1080/09593330.2015.1075598. (75)

Hingston, F. J.; Atkinson, R. J.; Posner, A. M.; Quirk, J. P. Specific Adsorption of

Anions. Nature 1967, 215, 1459-1461, DOI 10.1038/2151459a0. (76)

Prashantha Kumar, T. K. M.; Mandlimath, T. R.; Sangeetha, P.; Revathi, S. K.; Ashok

Kumar, S. K. Nanoscale Materials as Sorbents for Nitrate and Phosphate Removal from Water. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2018, 16 (2), 389-400, DOI 10.1007/s10311-017-0682-7. (77)

Rashidi Nodeh, H.; Sereshti, H.; Zamiri Afsharian, E.; Nouri, N. Enhanced Removal of

Phosphate and Nitrate Ions from Aqueous Media Using Nanosized Lanthanum Hydrous Doped on Magnetic Graphene Nanocomposite. J. Environ. Manage. 2017, 197, 265-274, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.04.004. (78)

Harris, S. M.; Nguyen, J. T.; Pailloux, S. L.; Mansergh, J. P.; Dresel, M. J.; Swanholm, T.

B.; Gao, T.; Pierre, V. C. Gadolinium Complex for the Catch and Release of Phosphate from Water. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51 (8), 4549-4558, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.6b05815. (79)

Li, Y.; Jin, H.; Liu, W.; Su, H.; Lu, Y.; Li, J. Study on Regeneration of Waste Powder

Activated Carbon through Pyrolysis and Its Adsorption Capacity of Phosphorus. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8 (1), 778, DOI 10.1038/s41598-017-19131-x. (80)

Yeon, K.-H.; Park, H.; Lee, S.-H.; Park, Y.-M.; Lee, S.-H.; Iwamoto, M. Zirconium

Mesostructures Immobilized in Calcium Alginate for Phosphate Removal. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2008, 25 (5), 1040-1046, DOI 10.1007/s11814-008-0170-7.



(81)

Page 42 of 61

Cabrera-Codony, A.; Gonzalez-Olmos, R.; Martín, M. J. Regeneration of Siloxane-

Exhausted Activated Carbon by Advanced Oxidation Processes. J. Hazard. Mater. 2015, 285, 501-508, DOI 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.11.053. (82)

Sakulpaisan,

S.;

Vongsetskul,

T.;

Reamouppaturm,

S.;

Luangkachao,

J.;

Tantirungrotechai, J.; Tangboriboonrat, P. Titania-Functionalized Graphene Oxide for an Efficient Adsorptive Removal of Phosphate Ions. J. Environ. Manage. 2016, 167, 99-104, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.11.028. (83)

Li, M.; Liu, J.; Xu, Y.; Qian, G. Phosphate Adsorption on Metal Oxides and Metal

Hydroxides: A Comparative Review. Environ. Rev. 2016, 24 (3), 319-332, DOI 10.1139/er2015-0080. (84)

Chon, C.-M.; Cho, D.-W.; Nam, I.-H.; Kim, J.-G.; Song, H. Fabrication of Fe/Mn Oxide

Composite Adsorbents for Adsorptive Removal of Zinc and Phosphate. J. Soils Sediments. 2018, 18 (3), 946-956, DOI 10.1007/s11368-017-1784-3. (85)

Manto, M. J.; Xie, P.; Keller, M. A.; Liano, W. E.; Pu, T.; Wang, C. Recovery of

Inorganic Phosphorus Using Copper-Substituted ZSM-5. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5 (7), 6192-6200, DOI 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b01127. (86)

Wang, X.; Lü, S.; Gao, C.; Feng, C.; Xu, X.; Bai, X.; Gao, N.; Yang, J.; Liu, M.; Wu, L.

Recovery of Ammonium and Phosphate from Wastewater by Wheat Straw-Based Amphoteric Adsorbent and Reusing as a Multifunctional Slow-Release Compound Fertilizer. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2016, 4 (4), 2068-2079, DOI 10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b01494. (87)

Zhang, X.; Guo, L.; Huang, H.; Jiang, Y.; Li, M.; Leng, Y. Removal of Phosphorus by

the Core-Shell Bio-Ceramic/Zn-Layered Double Hydroxides (LDHs) Composites for Municipal Wastewater Treatment in Constructed Rapid Infiltration System. Water Res. 2016, 96, 280-291, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2016.03.063. (88)

Kuzawa, K.; Jung, Y.-J.; Kiso, Y.; Yamada, T.; Nagai, M.; Lee, T.-G. Phosphate

Removal and Recovery with a Synthetic Hydrotalcite as an Adsorbent. Chemosphere 2006, 62 (1), 45-52, DOI 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.04.015. (89)

Ning, P.; Bart, H.-J.; Li, B.; Lu, X.; Zhang, Y. Phosphate Removal from Wastewater by

Model-La(III) Zeolite Adsorbents. J. Environ. Sci. 2008, 20 (6), 670-674, DOI 10.1016/S10010742(08)62111-7.


Page 43 of 61 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


(90)

Mangun, C. L.; Daley, M. A.; Braatz, R. D.; Economy, J. Effect of Pore Size on

Adsorption of Hydrocarbons in Phenolic-Based Activated Carbon Fibers. Carbon 1998, 36 (1), 123-129, DOI 10.1016/S0008-6223(97)00169-3. (91)

Devatha, C. P.; Thalla, A. K.; Katte, S. Y. Green Synthesis of Iron Nanoparticles Using

Different Leaf Extracts for Treatment of Domestic Waste Water. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 139, 1425-1435, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.019. (92)

Tu, Y.-J.; You, C.-F. Phosphorus Adsorption onto Green Synthesized Nano-Bimetal

Ferrites: Equilibrium, Kinetic and Thermodynamic Investigation. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 251, 285292, DOI 10.1016/j.cej.2014.04.036. (93)

Wang, T.; Jin, X.; Chen, Z.; Megharaj, M.; Naidu, R. Green Synthesis of Fe

Nanoparticles Using Eucalyptus Leaf Extracts for Treatment of Eutrophic Wastewater. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 466-467, 210-213, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.07.022. (94)

Xie, J.; Wang, Z.; Fang, D.; Li, C.; Wu, D. Green Synthesis of a Novel Hybrid Sorbent of

Zeolite/Lanthanum Hydroxide and Its Application in the Removal and Recovery of Phosphate from Water. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2014, 423, 13-19, DOI 10.1016/j.jcis.2014.02.020. (95)

Colvin, V. L. The Potential Environmental Impact of Engineered Nanomaterials. Nature

Biotechnol. 2003, 21, 1166, DOI 10.1038/nbt875. (96)

Magrez, A.; Kasas, S.; Salicio, V.; Pasquier, N.; Seo, J. W.; Celio, M.; Catsicas, S.;

Schwaller, B.; Forró, L. Cellular Toxicity of Carbon-Based Nanomaterials. Nano Lett. 2006, 6 (6), 1121-1125, DOI 10.1021/nl060162e. (97)

Gang, L.; Jinhao, G.; Hua, A.; Xiaoyuan, C. Applications and Potential Toxicity of

Magnetic

Iron

Oxide

Nanoparticles.

Small

2013,

9

(9‐10),

1533-1545,

DOI

10.1002/smll.201201531. (98)

Sharma, V. K. Aggregation and Toxicity of Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles in Aquatic

Environment-a Review. J. Environ. Sci. Health A 2009, 44 (14), 1485-1495, DOI 10.1080/10934520903263231. (99)

Braydich-Stolle, L. K.; Speshock, J. L.; Castle, A.; Smith, M.; Murdock, R. C.; Hussain,

S. M. Nanosized Aluminum Altered Immune Function. ACS Nano 2010, 4 (7), 3661-3670, DOI 10.1021/nn9016789.



Page 44 of 61

(100) Singh, S. P.; Kumari, M.; Kumari, S. I.; Rahman, M. F.; Mahboob, M.; Grover, P. Toxicity Assessment of Manganese Oxide Micro and Nanoparticles in Wistar Rats after 28 Days of Repeated Oral Exposure. J. Appl. Toxicol. 2013, 33 (10), 1165-79, DOI 10.1002/jat.2887. (101) Lim, C.-H. Toxicity of Two Different Sized Lanthanum Oxides in Cultured Cells and Sprague-Dawley Rats. Toxicol. Res. 2015, 31 (2), 181-189, DOI 10.5487/tr.2015.31.2.181. (102) Sajid, M. Toxicity of Nanoscale Metal Organic Frameworks: A Perspective. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2016, 23 (15), 14805-14807, DOI 10.1007/s11356-016-7053-y. (103) Qu, X.; Alvarez, P. J. J.; Li, Q. Applications of Nanotechnology in Water and Wastewater

Treatment.

Water

Res.

47

2013,

(12),

3931-3946,

DOI

10.1016/j.watres.2012.09.058. (104) Penn, C.; Chagas, I.; Klimeski, A.; Lyngsie, G. A Review of Phosphorus Removal Structures: How to Assess and Compare Their Performance. Water 2017, 9 (8), DOI 10.3390/W9080583. (105) Zhang, W. Y.; Yuan, J. Y. Poly(1-Vinyl-1,2,4-Triazolium) Poly(Ionic Liquid)S: Synthesis and the Unique Behavior in Loading Metal Ions. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2016, 37 (14), 1124-1129, DOI 10.1002/marc.201600001. (106) Zhang, W.; Zhao, Q.; Yuan, J. Porous Polyelectrolytes: Charge Pores for More Functionalities.

Angew.

Chem.

Int.

Ed.

Engl.

2017,

57

(23),

6754-6773,

DOI

10.1002/anie.201710272. (107) Ma, A.; Zheng, X.; Liu, C.; Peng, J.; Li, S.; Zhang, L.; Liu, C., Study on Regeneration of Spent Activated Carbon by Using a Clean Technology. Green Process. Synth. 2017, 6 (5), 499510, DOI 10.1515/gps-2016-0110. (108) Dias, J. M.; Alvim-Ferraz, M. C. M.; Almeida, M. F.; Rivera-Utrilla, J.; Sánchez-Polo, M. Waste Materials for Activated Carbon Preparation and Its Use in Aqueous-Phase Treatment: A Review. J. Environ. Manage. 2007, 85 (4), 833-846, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.07.031. (109) Sudaryanto, Y.; Hartono, S. B.; Irawaty, W.; Hindarso, H.; Ismadji, S. High Surface Area Activated Carbon Prepared from Cassava Peel by Chemical Activation. Bioresour. Technol. 2006, 97 (5), 734-739, DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2005.04.029. (110) Zhang, L.; Wan, L.; Chang, N.; Liu, J.; Duan, C.; Zhou, Q.; Li, X.; Wang, X. Removal of Phosphate from Water by Activated Carbon Fiber Loaded with Lanthanum Oxide. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 190 (1), 848-855, DOI 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.04.021. 44 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 45 of 61 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


(111) Zhang, L.; Zhou, Q.; Liu, J.; Chang, N.; Wan, L.; Chen, J. Phosphate Adsorption on Lanthanum Hydroxide-Doped Activated Carbon Fiber. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 185-186, 160-167, DOI 10.1016/j.cej.2012.01.066. (112) Zhao, G.; Li, J.; Ren, X.; Chen, C.; Wang, X. Few-Layered Graphene Oxide Nanosheets as Superior Sorbents for Heavy Metal Ion Pollution Management. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45 (24), 10454-10462, DOI 10.1021/es203439v. (113) Wang, S.; Sun, H.; Ang, H. M.; Tadé, M. O. Adsorptive Remediation of Environmental Pollutants Using Novel Graphene-Based Nanomaterials. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 226, 336-347, DOI 10.1016/j.cej.2013.04.070. (114) Namvari, M.; Namazi, H. Synthesis of Magnetic Citric‐Acid‐Functionalized Graphene Oxide and Its Application in the Removal of Methylene Blue from Contaminated Water. Polym. Int. 2014, 63 (10), 1881-1888, DOI 10.1002/pi.4769. (115) Bradder, P.; Ling, S. K.; Wang, S.; Liu, S. Dye Adsorption on Layered Graphite Oxide. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2011, 56 (1), 138-141, DOI 10.1021/je101049g. (116) Mubarak, N. M.; Sahu, J. N.; Abdullah, E. C.; Jayakumar, N. S. Removal of Heavy Metals from Wastewater Using Carbon Nanotubes. Sep. Purif. Rev. 2014, 43 (4), 311-338, DOI 10.1080/15422119.2013.821996. (117) Chen, X.; Wang, X. C.; Yang, S. La(Iii) Coagulated Graphene Oxide for Phosphate Binding: Mechanism and Behaviour. Int. J. Environ. Studies 2017, 74 (4), 586-602, DOI 10.1080/00207233.2017.1333271. (118) Zong, E.; Wei, D.; Wan, H.; Zheng, S.; Xu, Z.; Zhu, D. Adsorptive Removal of Phosphate Ions from Aqueous Solution Using Zirconia-Functionalized Graphite Oxide. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 221, 193-203, DOI 10.1016/j.cej.2013.01.088. (119) Zhang, L.; Gao, Y.; Li, M.; Liu, J. Expanded Graphite Loaded with Lanthanum Oxide Used as a Novel Adsorbent for Phosphate Removal from Water: Performance and Mechanism Study. Environ. Technol. 2015, 36 (8), 1016-1025, DOI 10.1080/09593330.2014.971884. (120) Luo, X.; Wang, X.; Bao, S.; Liu, X.; Zhang, W.; Fang, T. Adsorption of Phosphate in Water Using One-Step Synthesized Zirconium-Loaded Reduced Graphene Oxide. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 39108, DOI 10.1038/srep39108.



Page 46 of 61

(121) Zong, E.; Wei, D.; Wan, H.; Zheng, S.; Xu, Z.; Zhu, D. Adsorptive Removal of Phosphate Ions from Aqueous Solution Using Zirconia-Functionalized Graphite Oxide. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 221, 193-203, DOI 10.1016/j.cej.2013.01.088. (122) Luo, X.; Wang, X.; Bao, S.; Liu, X.; Zhang, W.; Fang, T. Adsorption of Phosphate in Water Using One-Step Synthesized Zirconium-Loaded Reduced Graphene Oxide. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 39108, DOI 10.1038/srep39108 (123) Zhang, L.; Gao, Y.; Li, M.; Liu, J. Expanded Graphite Loaded with Lanthanum Oxide Used as a Novel Adsorbent for Phosphate Removal from Water: Performance and Mechanism Study. Environ. Technol. 2015, 36 (8), 1016-1025, DOI 10.1080/09593330.2014.971884. (124) Mahdavi, S.; Akhzari, D. The Removal of Phosphate from Aqueous Solutions Using Two Nano-Structures: Copper Oxide and Carbon Tubes. Clean Technol Environ. 2016, 18 (3), 817827, DOI 10.1007/s10098-015-1058-y. (125) Hai, R.; Wang, Y.; Wang, X.; Du, Z.; Li, Y. Impacts of Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes on Nutrient Removal from Wastewater and Bacterial Community Structure in Activated Sludge. PLoS ONE 2014, 9 (9), e107345, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0107345. (126) Eberhardt, T. L.; Min, S.-H. Biosorbents Prepared from Wood Particles Treated with Anionic Polymer and Iron Salt: Effect of Particle Size on Phosphate Adsorption. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99 (3), 626-630, DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2006.12.037. (127) Krishnan, K. A.; Haridas, A. Removal of Phosphate from Aqueous Solutions and Sewage Using Natural and Surface Modified Coir Pith. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 152 (2), 527-535, DOI 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.07.015. (128) Mezenner, N. Y.; Bensmaili, A. Kinetics and Thermodynamic Study of Phosphate Adsorption on Iron Hydroxide-Eggshell Waste. Chem. Eng. J. 2009, 147 (2), 87-96, DOI 10.1016/j.cej.2008.06.024. (129) Aryal, M.; Liakopoulou-Kyriakides, M. Equilibrium, Kinetics and Thermodynamic Studies on Phosphate Biosorption from Aqueous Solutions by Fe(III)-Treated Staphylococus Xylosus Biomass: Common Ion Effect. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2011, 387 (1), 43-49, DOI 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2011.07.019. (130) EPA/ Varshovi, A. A. Phosphorus Removal and Recovery through Newly Developed Adsorption Technology; Sep 2016; p EPD15032. 46 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 47 of 61 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


(131) Yao, Y.; Gao, B.; Chen, J.; Yang, L. Engineered Biochar Reclaiming Phosphate from Aqueous Solutions: Mechanisms and Potential Application as a Slow-Release Fertilizer. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47 (15), 8700-8708, DOI 10.1021/es4012977. (132) Rout, P. R.; Bhunia, P.; Dash, R. R. Evaluation of Kinetic and Statistical Models for Predicting Breakthrough Curves of Phosphate Removal Using Dolochar-Packed Columns. J. Water Proc. Eng. 2017, 17, 168-180, DOI 10.1016/j.jwpe.2017.04.003. (133) Xu, X.; Gao, B.; Wang, W.; Yue, Q.; Wang, Y.; Ni, S. Adsorption of Phosphate from Aqueous Solutions onto Modified Wheat Residue: Characteristics, Kinetic and Column Studies. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2009, 70 (1), 46-52, DOI 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2008.12.006. (134) Yadav, D.; Kapur, M.; Kumar, P.; Mondal, M. K. Adsorptive Removal of Phosphate from Aqueous Solution Using Rice Husk and Fruit Juice Residue. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2015, 94, 402-409, DOI 10.1016/j.psep.2014.09.005. (135) Mor, S.; Chhoden, K.; Ravindra, K. Application of Agro-Waste Rice Husk Ash for the Removal of Phosphate from the Wastewater. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 129, 673-680, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.088. (136) Jiang, Y.; Deng, T.; Yang, K.; Wang, H. Removal Performance of Phosphate from Aqueous Solution Using a High-Capacity Sewage Sludge-Based Adsorbent. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2017, 76, 59-64, DOI 10.1016/j.jtice.2017.04.002. (137) Chan, K. Y.; Van Zwieten, L.; Meszaros, I.; Downie, A.; Joseph, S. Using Poultry Litter Biochars as Soil Amendments. Soil Res. 2008, 46 (5), 437-444, DOI 10.1071/SR08036. (138) Qian, T.; Zhang, X.; Hu, J.; Jiang, H. Effects of Environmental Conditions on the Release of

Phosphorus

from

Biochar.

Chemosphere

2013,

93

(9),

2069-2075,

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.07.041. (139) Silber, A.; Levkovitch, I.; Graber, E. R. Ph-Dependent Mineral Release and Surface Properties of Cornstraw Biochar: Agronomic Implications. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44 (24), 9318-9323, DOI 10.1021/es101283d. (140) Cao, X.; Harris, W. Properties of Dairy-Manure-Derived Biochar Pertinent to Its Potential Use in Remediation. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101 (14), 5222-5228, DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.02.052.



Page 48 of 61

(141) He, H.; Qian, T.-T.; Liu, W.-J.; Jiang, H.; Yu, H.-Q. Biological and Chemical Phosphorus Solubilization from Pyrolytical Biochar in Aqueous Solution. Chemosphere 2014, 113, 175-181, DOI 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.05.039. (142) Colilla, M., Silica-Based Ceramics: Mesoporous Silica. In Bio-Ceramics with Clinical Applications, Vallet-Regí, M., Ed. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd: Chichester, UK, 2014; Chapter 5, pp 109–151. (143) Fryxell, G. E.; Liu, J.; Hauser, T. A.; Nie, Z.; Ferris, K. F.; Mattigod, S.; Gong, M.; Hallen, R. T. Design and Synthesis of Selective Mesoporous Anion Traps. Chem. Mater. 1999, 11 (8), 2148-2154, DOI 10.1021/cm990104c. (144) Yokoi, T.; Tatsumi, T.; Yoshitake, H. Fe3+ Coordinated to Amino-Functionalized Mcm41: An Adsorbent for The toxic Oxyanions with High Capacity, Resistibility to Inhibiting Anions, And reusability after a Simple Treatment. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2004, 274 (2), 451457, DOI 10.1016/j.jcis.2004.02.037. (145) Hamoudi, S.; El-Nemr, A.; Belkacemi, K. Adsorptive Removal of Dihydrogenphosphate Ion from Aqueous Solutions Using Mono, Di- and Tri-Ammonium-Functionalized Sba-15. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2010, 343 (2), 615-621, DOI 10.1016/j.jcis.2009.11.070. (146) Chouyyok, W.; Wiacek, R. J.; Pattamakomsan, K.; Sangvanich, T.; Grudzien, R. M.; Fryxell, G. E.; Yantasee, W. Phosphate Removal by Anion Binding on Functionalized Nanoporous Sorbents. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44 (8), 3073-3078, DOI 10.1021/es100787m. (147) Al-Zboon, K. K. Phosphate Removal by Activated Carbon–Silica Nanoparticles Composite, Kaolin, and Olive Cake. Environment Development and Sustainabili. 2017, 1–18, DOI 10.1007/s10668-017-0012-z. (148) Yu, R.; Liu, F.; Ren, H.; Wu, J.; Zhang, X. Formation of Magnesium Hydrosilicate Nanomaterials and Its Applications for Phosphate/Ammonium Removal. Environ. Technol. 2017, 1-6, DOI 10.1080/09593330.2017.1351495. (149) Huang, W.; Zhang, Y.; Li, D. Adsorptive Removal of Phosphate from Water Using Mesoporous Materials: A Review. J. Environ. Manage. 2017, 193, 470-482, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.02.030. (150) Wang, S.; Peng, Y. Natural Zeolites as Effective Adsorbents in Water and Wastewater Treatment. Chem. Eng. J. 2010, 156 (1), 11-24, DOI 10.1016/j.cej.2009.10.029.


Page 49 of 61 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


(151) Faghihian, H.; Ghannadi Marageh, M.; Kazemian, H. The Use of Clinoptilolite and Its Sodium Form for Removal of Radioactive Cesium, and Strontium from Nuclear Wastewater and Pb2+, Ni2+, Cd2+, Ba2+ from Municipal Wastewater. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 1999, 50 (4), 655-660, DOI 10.1016/S0969-8043(98)00134-1. (152) Dionisiou, N. S.; Matsi, T.; Misopolinos, Ν. D. Phosphorus Adsorption-Desorption on a Surfactant-Modified Natural Zeolite: A Laboratory Study. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2012, 224 (1), 1362, DOI 10.1007/s11270-012-1362-7. (153) Xie, J.; Lai, L.; Lin, L.; Wu, D.; Zhang, Z.; Kong, H. Phosphate Removal from Water by a Novel Zeolite/Lanthanum Hydroxide Hybrid Material Prepared from Coal Fly Ash. J. Environ. Sci. Health A 2015, 50 (12), 1298-1305, DOI 10.1080/10934529.2015.1055159. (154) Hermassi, M.; Valderrama, C.; Moreno, N.; Font, O.; Querol, X.; Batis, N.; Cortina, J. L. Powdered Ca-Activated Zeolite for Phosphate Removal from Treated Waste-Water. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2016, 91 (7), 1962-1971, DOI 10.1002/jctb.4867. (155) Hongshao, Z.; Stanforth, R. Competitive Adsorption of Phosphate and Arsenate on Goethite. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2001, 35 (24), 4753-4757, DOI 10.1021/es010890y. (156) Huang, X. Intersection of Isotherms for Phosphate Adsorption on Hematite. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2004, 271 (2), 296-307, DOI 10.1016/j.jcis.2003.12.007. (157) Chitrakar, R.; Tezuka, S.; Sonoda, A.; Sakane, K.; Ooi, K.; Hirotsu, T. Selective Adsorption of Phosphate from Seawater and Wastewater by Amorphous Zirconium Hydroxide. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2006, 297 (2), 426-433, DOI 10.1016/j.jcis.2005.11.011. (158) Liu, H.; Sun, X.; Yin, C.; Hu, C. Removal of Phosphate by Mesoporous ZrO2. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 151 (2), 616-622, DOI 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.06.033. (159) Galarneau, E.; Gehr, R. Phosphorus Removal from Wastewaters: Experimental and Theoretical Support for Alternative Mechanisms. Water Res. 1997, 31 (2), 328-338, DOI 10.1016/S0043-1354(96)00256-4. (160) Yao, W.; Millero, F. J. Adsorption of Phosphate on Manganese Dioxide in Seawater. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1996, 30 (2), 536-541, DOI 10.1021/es950290x. (161) Yao, W.; Millero, F. J. Adsorption of Phosphate on Manganese Dioxide in Seawater. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1996, 30 (2), 536-541, DOI 10.1021/es950290x. (162) Zhang, Y.; Guo, X. M.; Wu, F.; Yao, Y.; Yuan, Y. F.; Bi, X. X.; Luo, X. Y.; ShahbazianYassar, R.; Zhang, C. Z.; Amine, K. Mesocarbon Microbead Carbon-Supported Magnesium 49 ACS Paragon Plus Environment


Page 50 of 61

Hydroxide Nanoparticles: Turning Spent Li-Ion Battery Anode into a Highly Efficient Phosphate Adsorbent for Wastewater Treatment. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8 (33), 21315-21325, DOI 10.1021/acsami.6b05458. (163) Smit, A. L.; Bindraban, P. S.; Schröder, J.; Conijn, J.; Van der Meer, H. Phosphorus in Agriculture: Global Resoources, Trends and Developments: Report to the Steering Committee Technology Assessment of the Ministery of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality 1566-7790; Plant Research International: Wagenigen University: The Netherlands, 2009; p 36. (164) Almeelbi, T.; Bezbaruah, A. Aqueous Phosphate Removal Using Nanoscale Zero-Valent Iron. J. Nanopart. Res. 2012, 14 (7), 900, DOI 10.1007/S11051-012-0900-Y. (165) Rashid, M.; Price, N. T.; Pinilla, M. A. G.; O'Shea, K. E. Effective Removal of Phosphate from Aqueous Solution Using Humic Acid Coated Magnetite Nanoparticles. Water Res. 2017, 123, 353-360, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2017.06.085. (166) Abo Markeb, A.; Alonso, A.; Dorado, A. D.; Sánchez, A.; Font, X. Phosphate Removal and Recovery from Water Using Nanocomposite of Immobilized Magnetite Nanoparticles on Cationic

Polymer.

Environ.

Technol.

2016,

37

(16),

2099-2112,

DOI

10.1080/09593330.2016.1141999. (167) Markeb, A. A.; Ordosgoitia, L. A.; Alonso, A.; Sanchez, A.; Font, X. Novel Magnetic Core-Shell Ce-Ti@Fe3O4 Nanoparticles as an Adsorbent for Water Contaminants Removal. RSC Adv. 2016, 6 (62), 56913-56917, DOI 10.1039/c6ra12144f. (168) Rashidi Nodeh, H.; Sereshti, H.; Zamiri Afsharian, E.; Nouri, N. Enhanced Removal of Phosphate and Nitrate Ions from Aqueous Media Using Nanosized Lanthanum Hydrous Doped on Magnetic Graphene Nanocomposite. J. Environ. Manage. 2017, 197, 265-274, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.04.004. (169) Shen, H.; Wang, Z.; Zhou, A.; Chen, J.; Hu, M.; Dong, X.; Xia, Q. Adsorption of Phosphate onto Amine Functionalized Nano-Sized Magnetic Polymer Adsorbents: Mechanism and Magnetic Effects. RSC Adv. 2015, 5 (28), 22080-22090, DOI 10.1039/c4ra14630a. (170) Zhang, Q.; Teng, J.; Zou, G.; Peng, Q.; Du, Q.; Jiao, T.; Xiang, J. Efficient Phosphate Sequestration for Water Purification by Unique Sandwich-Like Mxene/Magnetic Iron Oxide Nanocomposites. Nanoscale 2016, 8 (13), 7085-7093, DOI 10.1039/c5nr09303a.


Page 51 of 61 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


(171) Pan, B.; Han, F.; Nie, G.; Wu, B.; He, K.; Lu, L. New Strategy to Enhance Phosphate Removal from Water by Hydrous Manganese Oxide. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48 (9), 51015107, DOI 10.1021/es5004044. (172) Lürling, M.; Waajen, G.; van Oosterhout, F. Humic Substances Interfere with Phosphate Removal by Lanthanum Modified Clay in Controlling Eutrophication. Water Res. 2014, 54, 7888, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2014.01.059. (173) Othman, A.; Karimi, A.; Andreescu, S. Functional Nanostructures for Enzyme Based Biosensors: Properties, Fabrication and Applications. J. Mater. Chem. B 2016, 4 (45), 71787203, DOI 10.1039/c6tb02009g. (174) Andreescu, D.; Bulbul, G.; Ozel, R. E.; Hayat, A.; Sardesai, N.; Andreescu, S. Applications and Implications of Nanoceria Reactivity: Measurement Tools and Environmental Impact. Environ. Sci. Nano 2014, 1 (5), 445-458, DOI 10.1039/c4en00075g. (175) Teng, M.; Luo, L.; Yang, X. Synthesis of Mesoporous Ce1−XZrxO2 (X=0.2−0.5) and Catalytic Properties of Cuo Based Catalysts. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2009, 119 (1), 158-164, DOI 10.1016/j.micromeso.2008.10.019. (176) Su, Y.; Yang, W.; Sun, W.; Li, Q.; Shang, J. K. Synthesis of Mesoporous Cerium– Zirconium Binary Oxide Nanoadsorbents by a Solvothermal Process and Their Effective Adsorption of Phosphate from Water. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 268, 270-279, DOI 10.1016/j.cej.2015.01.070. (177) Liu, J.; Cao, J.; Hu, Y.; Han, Y.; Zhou, J. Adsorption of Phosphate Ions from Aqueous Solutions by a Ceo2 Functionalized Fe3O4@SiO2 Core-Shell Magnetic Nanomaterial. Water Sci. Technol. 2017, 76 (11), 2867-2875, DOI 10.2166/wst.2017.412. (178) Ding, H.; Zhao, Y.; Duan, Q.; Wang, J.; Zhang, K.; Ding, G.; Xie, X.; Ding, C. Efficient Removal of Phosphate from Aqueous Solution Using Novel Magnetic Nanocomposites with Fe3O4@SiO2 Core and Mesoporous Ceo2 Shell. J. Rare Earth. 2017, 35 (10), 984-994, DOI 10.1016/S1002-0721(17)61003-2. (179) Li, J.-R.; Kuppler, R. J.; Zhou, H.-C. Selective Gas Adsorption and Separation in MetalOrganic Frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38 (5), 1477-1504, DOI 10.1039/b802426j. (180) Li, L.; Li, J. C.; Rao, Z.; Song, G. W.; Hu, B. Metal Organic Framework [Cu3(Btc)2(H2o)3] for the Adsorption of Methylene Blue from Aqueous Solution. Desalin. Water Treat. 2014, 52 (37-39), 7332-7338, DOI 10.1080/19443994.2013.821955. 51 ACS Paragon Plus Environment


Page 52 of 61

(181) Ke, F.; Qiu, L.-G.; Yuan, Y.-P.; Peng, F.-M.; Jiang, X.; Xie, A.-J.; Shen, Y.-H.; Zhu, J.F. Thiol-Functionalization of Metal-Organic Framework by a Facile Coordination-Based Postsynthetic Strategy and Enhanced Removal of Hg2+ from Water. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 196, 36-43, DOI 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.08.069. (182) Liu, H.; Guo, W.; Liu, Z.; Li, X.; Wang, R. Effective Adsorption of Phosphate from Aqueous Solution by La-Based Metal-Organic Frameworks. RSC Adv. 2016, 6 (107), 105282105287, DOI 10.1039/c6ra24568d. (183) Li, Y.; Xie, Q.; Hu, Q.; Li, C.; Huang, Z.; Yang, X.; Guo, H. Surface Modification of Hollow Magnetic Fe3O4@NH2-MIL-101(Fe) Derived from Metal-Organic Frameworks for Enhanced Selective Removal of Phosphates from Aqueous Solution. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 30651, DOI 10.1038/srep30651. (184) Zhang, X.; Sun, F.; He, J.; Xu, H.; Cui, F.; Wang, W. Robust Phosphate Capture over Inorganic Adsorbents Derived from Lanthanum Metal Organic Frameworks. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 326, 1086-1094, DOI 10.1016/j.cej.2017.06.052. (185) Shen, H.; Wang, Z.; Zhou, A.; Chen, J.; Hu, M.; Dong, X.; Xia, Q. Adsorption of Phosphate onto Amine Functionalized Nano-Sized Magnetic Polymer Adsorbents: Mechanism and Magnetic Effects. RSC Adv. 2015, 5 (28), 22080-22090, DOI 10.1039/c4ra14630a. (186) Zhang, Y. Y.; Pan, B. C.; Shan, C.; Gao, X. Enhanced Phosphate Removal by Nanosized Hydrated La(III) Oxide Confined in Cross-Linked Polystyrene Networks. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 50 (3), 1447-1454, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.5b04630. (187) Du, H.; Lung, C. Y. K.; Lau, T.-C. Efficient Adsorption, Removal and Recovery of Phosphate and Nitrate from Water by a Novel Lanthanum(III)-Dowex M4195 Polymeric Ligand Exchanger. Environ. Sci.: Water Res. Technol. 2018, 4 (3), 421-427, DOI 10.1039/c7ew00421d. (188) Park, H.-S.; Kwak, S.-H.; Mahardika, D.; Mameda, N.; Choo, K.-H. Mixed Metal Oxide Coated Polymer Beads for Enhanced Phosphorus Removal from Membrane Bioreactor Effluents. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 319, 240-247, DOI 10.1016/j.cej.2017.03.017. (189) Rajeswari, A.; Amalraj, A.; Pius, A. Removal of Phosphate Using Chitosan-Polymer Composites.

J.

Environ.

Chem.

Eng.

2015,

3

(4,

Part

A),

2331-2341,

DOI

10.1016/j.jece.2015.08.022. (190) Mahaninia, M. H.; Wilson, L. D. Cross‐Linked Chitosan Beads for Phosphate Removal from Aqueous Solution. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016, 133 (5), DOI 10.1002/app.42949. 52 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 53 of 61 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


(191) Sowmya, A.; Meenakshi, S. A Novel Quaternized Chitosan–Melamine–Glutaraldehyde Resin for the Removal of Nitrate and Phosphate Anions. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2014, 64, 224232, DOI 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2013.11.036. (192) Kumar, I. A.; Viswanathan, N. Development of Multivalent Metal Ions Imprinted Chitosan Biocomposites for Phosphate Sorption. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 104, 1539-1547, DOI 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.02.100. (193) Zheng, Y.; Liu, Y.; Wang, A. Fast Removal of Ammonium Ion Using a Hydrogel Optimized with Response Surface Methodology. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 171 (3), 1201-1208, DOI 10.1016/j.cej.2011.05.026. (194) Su, Y.; Liu, J.; Yue, Q.; Li, Q.; Gao, B. Adsorption of Ammonium and Phosphate by Feather Protein Based Semi-Interpenetrating Polymer Networks Hydrogel as a ControlledRelease

Fertilizer.

Environ.

Technol.

2014,

35

(4),

446-455,

DOI

10.1080/09593330.2013.831461. (195) Oliveira, M.; Rodrigues, A. L.; Ribeiro, D.; Brito, A. G.; Nogueira, R.; Machado, A. V. Phosphorus Removal by a Fixed-Bed Hybrid Polymer Nanocomposite Biofilm Reactor. Chem. Ecol. 2014, 30 (5), 428-439, DOI 10.1080/02757540.2013.868889. (196) Tarmahi, M. H.; Moeinpour, F. Phosphate Removal from Aqueous Solutions Using Polyaniline/Ni0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 Magnetic Nanocomposite. Environ. Health Eng. Manage. J. 2017, 4 (2), 65-71, DOI 10.15171/ehem.2017.10. (197) Siwek, H.; Bartkowiak, A.; Włodarczyk, M.; Sobecka, K. Removal of Phosphate from Aqueous Solution Using Alginate/Iron (III) Chloride Capsules: A Laboratory Study. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2016, 227 (11), 427, DOI 10.1007/s11270-016-3128-0. (198) Mahmood, Z.; Nasir, S.; Jamil, N.; Sheikh, A.; Akram, A. Adsorption Studies of Phosphate Ions on Alginate-Calcium Carbonate Composite Beads. African J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 9 (3), 274-281, DOI 10.5897/AJEST2014.1784. (199) Jung, K.-W.; Jeong, T.-U.; Choi, J.-W.; Ahn, K.-H.; Lee, S.-H. Adsorption of Phosphate from Aqueous Solution Using Electrochemically Modified Biochar Calcium-Alginate Beads: Batch and Fixed-Bed Column Performance. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 244, 23-32, DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.07.133. (200) Gavette, J. V.; Mills, N. S.; Zakharov, L. N.; Johnson, C. A.; Johnson, D. W.; Haley, M. M. An Anion-Modulated Three-Way Supramolecular Switch That Selectively Binds Dihydrogen 53 ACS Paragon Plus Environment


Phosphate,

H2PO4-.

Angew.

Chem.

Int.

Ed.

2013,

52

Page 54 of 61

(39),

10270-10274,

DOI

10.1002/anie.201302929. (201) Zhao, W.; Qiao, B.; Chen, C. H.; Flood, A. H. High-Fidelity Multistate Switching with Anion-Anion and Acid-Anion Dimers of Organophosphates in Cyanostar Complexes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56 (42), 13083-13087, DOI 10.1002/anie.201707869. (202) Alsbaiee, A.; Smith, B. J.; Xiao, L.; Ling, Y.; Helbling, D. E.; Dichtel, W. R. Rapid Removal of Organic Micropollutants from Water by a Porous Β-Cyclodextrin Polymer. Nature 2015, 529, 190-194, DOI 10.1038/nature16185. (203) Kumar, P.; Sudha, S.; Chand, S.; Srivastava, V. C. Phosphate Removal from Aqueous Solution Using Coir-Pith Activated Carbon. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2010, 45 (10), 1463-1470, DOI 10.1080/01496395.2010.485604. (204) Yoon, S.-Y.; Lee, C.-G.; Park, J.-A.; Kim, J.-H.; Kim, S.-B.; Lee, S.-H.; Choi, J.-W. Kinetic, Equilibrium and Thermodynamic Studies for Phosphate Adsorption to Magnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 236, 341-347, DOI 10.1016/j.cej.2013.09.053. (205) de Vicente, I.; Merino-Martos, A.; Cruz-Pizarro, L.; de Vicente, J. On the Use of Magnetic Nano and Microparticles for Lake Restoration. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 181 (1), 375381, DOI 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.05.020. (206) Long, F.; Gong, J.-L.; Zeng, G.-M.; Chen, L.; Wang, X.-Y.; Deng, J.-H.; Niu, Q.-Y.; Zhang, H.-Y.; Zhang, X.-R. Removal of Phosphate from Aqueous Solution by Magnetic Fe–Zr Binary Oxide. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 171 (2), 448-455, DOI 10.1016/j.cej.2011.03.102. (207) Kim, J.-H.; Kim, S.-B.; Lee, S.-H.; Choi, J.-W. Laboratory and Pilot-Scale Field Experiments for Application of Iron Oxide Nanoparticle-Loaded Chitosan Composites to Phosphate Removal from Natural Water. Environ. Technol. 2018, 39 (6), 770-779, DOI 10.1080/09593330.2017.1310937. (208) Su, Y.; Cui, H.; Li, Q.; Gao, S.; Shang, J. K. Strong Adsorption of Phosphate by Amorphous Zirconium Oxide Nanoparticles. Water Res. 2013, 47 (14), 5018-5026, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2013.05.044. (209) Rodrigues, L. A.; Silva, M. L. C. P. d. Thermodynamic and Kinetic Investigations of Phosphate Adsorption onto Hydrous Niobium Oxide Prepared by Homogeneous Solution Method. Desalination 2010, 263 (1), 29-35, DOI 10.1016/j.desal.2010.06.030.


Page 55 of 61 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


(210) Paltrinieri, L.; Wang, M.; Sachdeva, S.; Besseling, N. A. M.; Sudholter, E. J. R.; de Smet, L. C. P. M. Fe3O4 Nanoparticles Coated with a Guanidinium-Functionalized Polyelectrolyte Extend the Ph Range for Phosphate Binding. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5 (35), 18476-18485, DOI 10.1039/c7ta04054g. (211) Rodrigues, L. A.; Maschio, L. J.; Coppio, L. d. S. C.; Thim, G. P.; Pinto da Silva, M. L. C. Adsorption of Phosphate from Aqueous Solution by Hydrous Zirconium Oxide. Environ. Technol. 2012, 33 (12), 1345-1351, DOI 10.1080/09593330.2011.632651. (212) Yan, L.-g.; Yang, K.; Shan, R.-r.; Yan, T.; Wei, J.; Yu, S.-j.; Yu, H.-q.; Du, B. Kinetic, Isotherm and Thermodynamic Investigations of Phosphate Adsorption onto Core–Shell Fe3O4@LDHs Composites with Easy Magnetic Separation Assistance. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2015, 448, 508-516, DOI 10.1016/j.jcis.2015.02.048. (213) Tran, D. N. H.; Kabiri, S.; Wang, L.; Losic, D. Engineered Graphene-Nanoparticle Aerogel Composites for Efficient Removal of Phosphate from Water. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3 (13), 6844-6852, DOI 10.1039/c4ta06308b. (214) Chen, M.; Huo, C.; Li, Y.; Wang, J. Selective Adsorption and Efficient Removal of Phosphate from Aqueous Medium with Graphene–Lanthanum Composite. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2016, 4 (3), 1296-1302, DOI 10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b01324. (215) Recillas, S.; García, A.; González, E.; Casals, E.; Puntes, V.; Sánchez, A.; Font, X. Preliminary Study of Phosphate Adsorption onto Cerium Oxide Nanoparticles for Use in Water Purification; Nanoparticles Synthesis and Characterization. Wat. Sci. Tech. 2012, 66 (3), 503509, DOI 10.2166/wst.2012.185. (216) Cao, D.; Jin, X.; Gan, L.; Wang, T.; Chen, Z. Removal of Phosphate Using Iron Oxide Nanoparticles Synthesized by Eucalyptus Leaf Extract in the Presence of CTAB Surfactant. Chemosphere 2016, 159, 23-31, DOI 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.05.080. (217) Ou, E.; Zhou, J.; Mao, S.; Wang, J.; Xia, F.; Min, L. Highly Efficient Removal of Phosphate by Lanthanum-Doped Mesoporous SiO2. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2007, 308 (1), 47-53, DOI 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2007.05.027. (218) Wang, X.; Dou, L.; Li, Z.; Yang, L.; Yu, J.; Ding, B. Flexible Hierarchical ZrO2 Nanoparticle-Embedded SiO2 Nanofibrous Membrane as a Versatile Tool for Efficient Removal of

Phosphate.

ACS

Appl.

Mater.

Interfaces

2016,

8

(50),

34668-34676,

DOI

10.1021/acsami.6b11294. 55 ACS Paragon Plus Environment


Page 56 of 61

(219) Xie, J.; Wang, Z.; Lu, S.; Wu, D.; Zhang, Z.; Kong, H. Removal and Recovery of Phosphate from Water by Lanthanum Hydroxide Materials. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 254, 163-170, DOI 10.1016/j.cej.2014.05.113. (220) Lalley, J.; Han, C.; Li, X.; Dionysiou, D. D.; Nadagouda, M. N. Phosphate Adsorption Using Modified Iron Oxide-Based Sorbents in Lake Water: Kinetics, Equilibrium, and Column Tests. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 284, 1386-1396, DOI 10.1016/j.cej.2015.08.114. (221) Qiu, H.; Yang, L.; Liu, F.; Zhao, Y.; Liu, L.; Zhu, J.; Song, M. Highly Selective Capture of Phosphate Ions from Water by a Water Stable Metal-Organic Framework Modified with Polyethyleneimine. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2017, 24 (30), 23694-23703, DOI 10.1007/s11356-017-9946-9. (222) Shams, M.; Dehghani, M. H.; Nabizadeh, R.; Mesdaghinia, A.; Alimohammadi, M.; Najafpoor, A. A. Adsorption of Phosphorus from Aqueous Solution by Cubic Zeolitic Imidazolate Framework-8: Modeling, Mechanical Agitation Versus Sonication. J. Mol. Liq. 2016, 224, 151-157, DOI 10.1016/j.molliq.2016.09.059. (223) Ahmed, S.; Guo, Y.; Huang, R.; Li, D.; Tang, P.; Feng, Y. Hexamethylene TetramineAssisted Hydrothermal Synthesis of Porous Magnesium Oxide for High-Efficiency Removal of Phosphate in Aqueous Solution. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5 (5), 4649-4655, DOI 10.1016/j.jece.2017.09.006. (224) Zong, E.; Liu, X.; Jiang, J.; Fu, S.; Chu, F. Preparation and Characterization of ZirconiaLoaded Lignocellulosic Butanol Residue as a Biosorbent for Phosphate Removal from Aqueous Solution. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2016, 387, 419-430, DOI 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.06.107. (225) Zong, E.; Huang, G.; Liu, X.; Lei, W.; Jiang, S.; Ma, Z.; Wang, J.; Song, P. A LigninBased Nano-Adsorbent for Superfast and Highly Selective Removal of Phosphate. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6 (21), 9971-9983, DOI 10.1039/c8ta01449c. (226) Hui, B.; Zhang, Y.; Ye, L. Preparation of PVA Hydrogel Beads and Adsorption Mechanism for Advanced Phosphate Removal. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 235, 207-214, DOI 10.1016/j.cej.2013.09.045. (227) Wan, J.; Zhu, C.; Hu, J.; Zhang, T. C.; Richter-Egger, D.; Feng, X.; Zhou, A.; Tao, T. Zirconium-Loaded Magnetic Interpenetrating Network Chitosan/Poly(Vinyl Alcohol) Hydrogels for Phosphorus Recovery from the Aquatic Environment. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 423, 484-491, DOI 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.06.201. 56 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 57 of 61 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


(228) Mahaninia, M. H.; Wilson, L. D. Phosphate Uptake Studies of Cross-Linked Chitosan Bead Materials. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2017, 485, 201-212, DOI 10.1016/j.jcis.2016.09.031. (229) Saberzadeh Sarvestani, F.; Esmaeili, H.; Ramavandi, B. Modification of Sargassum Angustifolium by Molybdate During a Facile Cultivation for High-Rate Phosphate Removal from Wastewater: Structural Characterization and Adsorptive Behavior. 3 Biotech 2016, 6 (2), 251, DOI 10.1007/s13205-016-0570-z. (230) Zhu, X.; Li, B.; Yang, J.; Li, Y.; Zhao, W.; Shi, J.; Gu, J. Effective Adsorption and Enhanced Removal of Organophosphorus Pesticides from Aqueous Solution by Zr-Based MOFs of Uio-67. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7 (1), 223-231, DOI 10.1021/am5059074. (231) Lai, Y.-S.; Chen, S. Adsorption of Organophosphate Pesticides with Humic FractionImmobilized Silica Gel in Hexane. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2013, 58 (8), 2290-2301, DOI 10.1021/je400399x. (232) Momić, T.; Pašti, T. L.; Bogdanović, U.; Vodnik, V.; Mraković, A.; Rakočević, Z.; Pavlović, V. B.; Vasić, V. Adsorption of Organophosphate Pesticide Dimethoate on Gold Nanospheres and Nanorods. J. Nanomater. 2016, 2016, 8910271, DOI 10.1155/2016/8910271. (233) Henych, J.; Janoš, P.; Kormunda, M.; Tolasz, J.; Štengl, V. Reactive Adsorption of Toxic Organophosphates Parathion Methyl and Dmmp on Nanostructured Ti/Ce Oxides and Their Composites. Arab. J. Chem. 2016, DOI 10.1016/j.arabjc.2016.06.002. (234) Wang, W.; Deng, S.; Li, D.; Ren, L.; Shan, D.; Wang, B.; Huang, J.; Wang, Y.; Yu, G. Sorption Behavior and Mechanism of Organophosphate Flame Retardants on Activated Carbons. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 332, 286-292, DOI 10.1016/j.cej.2017.09.085. (235) Meng, Q.; Doetschman, D. C.; Rizos, A. K.; Lee, M.-H.; Schulte, J. T.; Spyros, A.; Kanyi, C. W. Adsorption of Organophosphates into Microporous and Mesoporous Nax Zeolites and Subsequent Chemistry. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45 (7), 3000-3005, DOI 10.1021/es1030678. (236) Liu, X.; Zhang, H.; Ma, Y.; Wu, X.; Meng, L.; Guo, Y.; Yu, G.; Liu, Y. GrapheneCoated Silica as a Highly Efficient Sorbent for Residual Organophosphorus Pesticides in Water. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1 (5), 1875-1884, DOI 10.1039/c2ta00173j. (237) Zhang, C.; Zhang, R. Z.; Ma, Y. Q.; Guan, W. B.; Wu, X. L.; Liu, X.; Li, H.; Du, Y. L.; Pan, C. P. Preparation of Cellulose/Graphene Composite and Its Applications for Triazine



Page 58 of 61

Pesticides Adsorption from Water. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2015, 3 (3), 396-405, DOI 10.1021/sc500738k. (238) Yang, K.; Chen, B.; Zhu, L. Graphene-Coated Materials Using Silica Particles as a Framework for Highly Efficient Removal of Aromatic Pollutants in Water. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 11641, DOI 10.1038/srep11641. (239) Wang, P.; Luo, M.; Liu, D.; Zhan, J.; Liu, X.; Wang, F.; Zhou, Z.; Wang, P. Application of a Magnetic Graphene Nanocomposite for Organophosphorus Pesticide Extraction in Environmental

Water

Samples.

J.

Chromatogr.

A

2018,

1535,

9-16,

DOI

10.1016/j.chroma.2018.01.003. (240) Kamboh, M. A.; Ibrahim, W. A. W.; Nodeh, H. R.; Sanagi, M. M.; Sherazi, S. T. H. The Removal of Organophosphorus Pesticides from Water Using a New Amino-Substituted Calixarene-Based Magnetic Sporopollenin. New J. Chem. 2016, 40 (4), 3130-3138, DOI 10.1039/c5nj02284c. (241) Yan, W.; Yan, L.; Duan, J.; Jing, C. Sorption of Organophosphate Esters by Carbon Nanotubes. J. Hazard. Mater. 2014, 273, 53-60, DOI 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.03.030. (242) Yang, Q.; Wang, J.; Zhang, W.; Liu, F.; Yue, X.; Liu, Y.; Yang, M.; Li, Z.; Wang, J. Interface Engineering of Metal Organic Framework on Graphene Oxide with Enhanced Adsorption Capacity for Organophosphorus Pesticide. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 313, 19-26, DOI 10.1016/j.cej.2016.12.041. (243) Yang, Q.; Wang, J.; Chen, X.; Yang, W.; Pei, H.; Hu, N.; Li, Z.; Suo, Y.; Li, T.; Wang, J. The Simultaneous Detection and Removal of Organophosphorus Pesticides by a Novel Zr-MOF Based Smart Adsorbent. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6 (5), 2184-2192, DOI 10.1039/c7ta08399h. (244) Rahbar, N.; Behrouz, E.; Ramezani, Z. One-Step Synthesis of Zirconia and Magnetite Nanocomposite Immobilized Chitosan for Micro-Solid-Phase Extraction of Organophosphorous Pesticides from Juice and Water Samples Prior to Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy. Food Anal. Meth. 2017, 10 (7), 2229-2240, DOI 10.1007/s12161-016-0769-y. (245) Suo, F.; Xie, G.; Zhang, J.; Li, J.; Li, C.; Liu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, Y.; Ji, M. A Carbonised Sieve-Like Corn Straw Cellulose-Graphene Oxide Composite for Organophosphorus Pesticide Removal. RSC Adv. 2018, 8 (14), 7735-7743, DOI 10.1039/c7ra12898c. (246) Czapar, G.F.; Laflen, J.M.; McIsaac, G.F.; McKenna, D.P. Effects of erosion control practices on nutrient loss. Final Report: Gulf Hypoxia and Local Water Quality Concerns 58 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 59 of 61 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


Workshop; American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, MI (2008), pp. 117-126. (247) Steiner, G.; Geissler, B.; Watson, I.; Mew, M. C. Efficiency Developments in Phosphate Rock Mining over the Last Three Decades. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2015, 105, 235-245, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.10.004. (248) Urso, J. H.; Gilbertson, L. M. Atom Conversion Efficiency: A New Sustainability Metric Applied to Nitrogen and Phosphorus Use in Agriculture. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6 (4), 4453–4463, DOI 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b03600. (249) Schröder, J. J.; Smit, A. L.; Cordell, D.; Rosemarin, A. Improved Phosphorus Use Efficiency in Agriculture: A Key Requirement for Its Sustainable Use. Chemosphere 2011, 84 (6), 822-831, DOI 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.01.065. (250) Sattari, S. Z.; Bouwman, A. F.; Giller, K. E.; van Ittersum, M. K. Residual Soil Phosphorus as the Missing Piece in the Global Phosphorus Crisis Puzzle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109 (16), 6348-6353, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1113675109. (251) Veneklaas, E. J.; Lambers, H.; Bragg, J.; Finnegan, P. M.; Lovelock, C. E.; Plaxton, W. C.; Price, C. A.; Scheible, W. R.; Shane, M. W.; White, P. J.; Raven, J. A. Opportunities for Improving Phosphorus‐Use Efficiency in Crop Plants. New Phytologist 2012, 195 (2), 306-320, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04190.x.



Page 60 of 61

GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT

SYNOPSIS This perspective discusses contemporary challenges and nanotechnology-enabled solutions for the removal and recycling of phosphorus-containing chemicals to reduce excess nutrients and prevent water eutrophication.


Page 61 of 61 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


AUTHOR BIOGRAPHIES Ali Othman is currently a PhD candidate in the Department of Chemistry & Biomolecular Science at Clarkson University. He completed his M.Sc. from Jordan University of Science & Technology in Jordan. His research interests focus on controlled synthesis and characterization of nanostructured materials and their applications for sensing and environmental remediation.

Eduard Dumitrescu is currently a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Chemistry & Biomolecular Science at Clarkson University. He obtained his B.S. from the University of Bucharest, Romania in 2014. His current research focuses on the characterization of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles, their toxicity and environment impact.

Daniel Andreescu received his PhD degree in Chemistry from the University of Bucharest, Romania in 2002. In 2003 he joined Clarkson University where he currently works on the synthesis, characterization and applications of nanosize metallic, metal oxides and composites, and their interactions.

Silvana Andreescu is the Egon Matijević Endowed Chair in Chemistry in the Department of Chemistry and Biomolecular Science at Clarkson University. She received her PhD in 2002 from the University of Bucharest, Romania and University of Perpignan, France. Her research interests include the development of advanced materials and methods for sensing and environmental applications.


Nanoporous Sorbents for the Removal and Recovery of Phosphorus

Recommend Documents