Pb

Jun 18, 2019 - High-Efficient NUV Emission with Excellent Thermal Stability in Cd/Pb-Free AS-ZnO QDs by ALD without Surface ... Read OnlinePDF (13 MB)...
0 downloads 0 Views 13MB Size
Article Cite This: ACS Photonics 2019, 6, 1715−1727

pubs.acs.org/journal/apchd5

High-Efficient NUV Emission with Excellent Thermal Stability in Cd/ Pb-Free AS-ZnO QDs by ALD without Surface Passivation Jin Li, Youxing Yu,* and Xiaofang Bi*

Downloaded via UNIV OF SOUTHERN INDIANA on July 19, 2019 at 11:29:36 (UTC). See https://pubs.acs.org/sharingguidelines for options on how to legitimately share published articles.

Key Laboratory of Aerospace Materials and Performance (Ministry of Education), School of Materials Science and Engineering, Beihang University (BUAA), Beijing 100191, China ABSTRACT: Recently, near-ultraviolet (NUV)-emitting quantum dots (QDs) have attracted considerable attention for their potential in next-generation NUV-driven white-lightemitting diodes (with color rendering index >90). However, their widespread application in lighting products is greatly hindered by the inferior NUV-emitting efficiency, poor temperature stability, and toxicity of currently available Cd-/ Pb-containing QD systems. In the present work, we report the synthesis of ecofriendly Al2O3-surrounded (AS)-ZnO QDs using a novel technique based on atomic layer deposition, which shows a superior quantum yield (QY) of 97.3% in the NUV band (395 nm), in contrast to arcsin n2 (denoted by

value is difficult to obtain. Hence, the QY of AS-ZnO QDs embedded in the solid film can be determined using the common solution-based approaches, neither relatively nor absolutely. To circumvent this problem, the QY in this work is derived based on the data of cryogenic PL experiments, as will be discussed in the following. According to the definition, the QY of QDs is equal to the radiative recombination efficiency relative to overall energy relaxation in recombination. In the PL process, after excited by the incident light, the electrons at excited states can return to the ground state through either (1) phonon-assisted NR processes or (2) emitting photons. By using NAbs, NEm, and NNR to denote the number of absorbed incident photons, emitted photons, and nonradiatively recombined electrons during PL processes, the QY can be written as NEm/NAbs. Considering that the probability of radiative and nonradiative recombination should add up to 1, i.e., NAbs = NEm + NNR, one has QY =

NEm NEm = NAbs NNR + NEm

(4)

Here, small probability events, e.g., multiphoton processes, have been neglected. Since the NR process is thermally activated, its probability would be nearly zero at sufficiently low temperature, as illustrated in Figure 11(a), and thus NNR + NEM at RT will be approximately equal to the NEM at cryogenic temperature. Consequently, the QY can be estimated by the ratio of PL intensity at RT to that at cryogenic temperature (IRT/Icryo),44,51−53 as illustrated in Figure 11(b). In principle, the Icryo should be measured at 0 K. However, as indicated by Figure 8 and Figure 11(a), NR probability has been negligible at Tc owing to the large ET in this work, below which the PL intensity is virtually invariant. Therefore, it is justified to use the PL intensity of nitrogen temperature (77 K) as the Icryo in this case. During the QY measurement, the conditions of optical excitation and sample position are fixed for RT and for cryogenic temperature, so that the η for IRT and Icryo measurement are considered identical. Hence, QY = (IRT/ η)/(Icryo/η) = IRT/Icryo will be little affected by the value of η and can more reliably reflect the intrinsic emitting properties of AS-ZnO QDs. Figure 11(c) summarizes the QY of AS-ZnO QDs with different luminescent colors, which is remarkably enhanced with decreasing the emitting wavelength. As discussed above, this is attributed to the increase of ET caused by the strengthened QC effect.

1

emission-1) will totally be reflected at the film surface, traveling in the QDs-ML like in an optical fiber, and mostly dissipate into thermal energy, as illustrated by Figure 10(b). Here, n1 and n2 are the refractive indexes for the QDs-ML film and surrounding medium (quartz or air). Only those with n incident angle θ < arcsin n2 (denoted by emission-2) can 1

escape and reach the detector. Therefore, the QY of AS-ZnO QDs is correlated with the EQE of the QDs-ML film by the relation EQE = QY × η, where η < 1 is the extraction factor. However, η is dependent on many extrinsic factors, such as the film thickness or the angle of the incident beam, whose exact 1724

DOI: 10.1021/acsphotonics.9b00382 ACS Photonics 2019, 6, 1715−1727

ACS Photonics

Article

The excellent optical properties, in conjunction with facile synthesis and nontoxicity, endow AS-ZnO QDs with great potential for widespread lighting applications.

The AS-ZnO QDs possess an NUV-emitting QY as high as 97.4% at RT, which represents significant improvement in comparison with previous results, as summarized in Table 1.



Table 1. Comparison of Quantum Yield for NUV-Emitting QDs QD structure

emission peak (nm)

QY (%)

bandgap (eV)

origin of emission

AS-ZnO

395

97

5.08

Sa

ZnSe/ZnS Cs2Sb2Br9 CsPbCl3 FAPbCl3

409 410 405 415

63 46 10 1

3.12 3.31 3.10 3.16

Ib I I I

EXPERIMENTAL SECTION Detailed Deposition Conditions. Trimethylaluminum (TMA, Al(CH3)3, 99.999% purity, CAS: 75-24-1) and diethylzinc (DEZn, Zn(C2H5)2, 99.999% purity, CAS: 55720-0) were used as Al and Zn precursors, and deionized water (H2O) was used as the oxidant, respectively. High-purity nitrogen (N2) was used as carrier and purge gas with a flow rate of 30 sccm. During the deposition, the ALD chamber was fixed at 150 °C and precursors were at room temperature. Growth parameters for Al2O3 deposition were as follows: 0.3 s TMA exposure−40 s N2 purge−0.2 s H2O exposure−20 s N2 purge. Growth parameters for ZnO deposition were as follows: T s DEZn exposure−10 s N2 purge−0.02 s H2O exposure−10 s N2 purge, where T represents the exposure time for DEZn and is in the range of 0.01 to 0.03 s for depositing ZnO QDs of different sizes. The number of ZnO ALD cycles in a single layer of AS-ZnO QDs was fixed at 20. Characterization. Crystallinity was characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurement using a D/max 2500 X-ray diffraction spectrometer (Cu Kα, λ = 1.540 56 Å). Surface and cross-section morphology were observed using a transmission electron microscope (TEM) (JEM-2100F, JEM, Japan). Optical transmittance curves were measured using a UV3600 ultraviolet−visible spectrophotometer (UV-3600, Shimadzu, Japan), and luminescent behaviors were characterized by photoluminescence spectra using an FLS-980 fluorescence spectrometer with a cryogenic accessory (Edinburgh Instruments, UK) in the temperature range from 77 to 500 K. Chemical binding energies of the deposited films were inspected using an XPS and XAES spectroscope equipped with a monochromatic Al Kα radiation source of 1486.6 eV (Thermo Scientific Escalab 250Xi) at room temperature, and the obtained binding energies were corrected with respect to the C 1s binding energy of 284.5 eV. EPR measurements were performed at RT with a Bruker A300-10/12 spectrometer under dark and illumination conditions.

ref this work 54 16 6 5

a

S stands for surface state recombination. bI represents intrinsic transition.

Moreover, it is mentioned that the NUV emission has exceptional temperature stability, which can retain a high QY of 87% at 500 K, as shown in Figure 8c, without any irreversible structural deterioration. To date, it has been reported that luminescence of QDs was rapidly quenched at elevated temperatures. The surface structures of QDs are usually unstable to high temperature due to the degraded surface condition, such as the detachment of capped passivating ligands on QDs or deterioration of core/shell interface matching quality owing to the different thermal expansion between core/shell materials. These would lead to a large increase of surface state number as the temperature increases, which, in turn, causes intensified NR and irreversible damage to the luminescence of QDs.9,55,56 Therefore, the presented observation is of practical significance for lighting applications. Also mentioned is the advantages of AS-ZnO QDs in device implementation for their robustness to the environment and facile synthesis, which, for instance, are extremely stable toward oxygen and moisture due to the fullinorganic structure, showing no performance degradation with time. Besides, compared with spin-coating, ALD can grow very conformal QD thin films with precise thickness control on various substrates or the surface of nanostructures, which is highly desired in the fabrication of nanodevices.





CONCLUSIONS In summary, we have developed a promising and facile technique to synthesize QDs through controlling exposure time of precursors during the ALD process, based on which AS-ZnO QD with ultrasmall average radius (2.1 nm) and highly enhanced bandgap (from 3.2 to 5.08 eV) was obtained. The AS-ZnO QDs exhibited a bright visible emission stemming from the peroxide surface state Zn*, whose energy can be enhanced from 2.11 eV to 3.14 eV (395 nm) into the NUV band, by reducing tep from 0.03 s to 0.01 s based on QC effects. The cryogenic PL experiments revealed that the ultrastrong QC in AS-ZnO QDs also remarkably increased the ET for NR and thermal quenching at surface states (from 65 to 168 meV), which effectively suppressed the NR probability. The simultaneous increase of emitting energy and radiative efficiency turned surface states into high-efficient NUV emitters with an ultrahigh QY of 97.4%. Besides, the ASZnO QDs possess extraordinary thermal stability, which demonstrated little efficiency degradation or structure deterioration above RT, retaining a QY of 87% at 500 K.

AUTHOR INFORMATION

Corresponding Authors

*E-mail: [email protected]. *E-mail: [email protected]. ORCID

Jin Li: 0000-0003-1099-6289 Youxing Yu: 0000-0002-3281-3765 Funding

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 61671040 and the Academic Excellence Foundation of BUAA for PhD Students. Notes

The authors declare no competing financial interest.



REFERENCES

(1) Bang, E.; Choi, Y.; Cho, J.; Suh, Y.-H.; Ban, H. W.; Son, J. S.; Park, J. Large-Scale Synthesis of Highly Luminescent InP@ZnS Quantum Dots Using Elemental Phosphorus Precursor. Chem. Mater. 2017, 29, 4236−4243.

1725

DOI: 10.1021/acsphotonics.9b00382 ACS Photonics 2019, 6, 1715−1727

ACS Photonics

Article

(21) Zhang, L.; Yin, L.; Wang, C.; Lun, N.; Qi, Y.; Xiang, D. Origin of Visible Photoluminescence of ZnO Quantum Dots: DefectDependent and Size-Dependent. J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 9651− 9658. (22) van Dijken, A.; Meulenkamp, E. A.; Vanmaekelbergh, D.; Meijerink, A. Identification of the Transition Responsible for the Visible Emission in ZnO Using Quantum Size Effects. J. Lumin. 2000, 90, 123−128. (23) George, S. M. Atomic Layer Deposition: An Overview. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 111−131. (24) Elam, J. W.; Sechrist, Z. A.; George, S. M. ZnO/Al2O3 Nanolaminates Fabricated by Atomic Layer Deposition: Growth and Surface Roughness Measurements. Thin Solid Films 2002, 414, 43− 55. (25) Puurunen, R. L. Surface Chemistry of Atomic Layer Deposition: A Case Study for the Trimethylaluminum/Water Process. J. Appl. Phys. 2005, 97, 121301. (26) Wickberg, A.; Kieninger, C.; Sürgers, C.; Schlabach, S.; Mu, X.; Koos, C.; Wegener, M. Second-Harmonic Generation from ZnO/ Al2O3 Nanolaminate Optical Metamaterials Grown by Atomic-Layer Deposition. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2016, 4, 1203−1208. (27) Lu, H.; Yang, M.; Xie, Z.; Geng, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, P.; Sun, Q.; Ding, S.-J.; Wei Zhang, D. Band Alignment and Interfacial Structure of ZnO/Si Heterojunction with Al2O3 and HfO2 as Interlayers. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014, 104, 161602. (28) Liu, J. W.; Kobayashi, A.; Ohta, J.; Fujioka, H.; Oshima, M. Electrical Properties of Amorphous-Al2O3 /Single-Crystal ZnO Heterointerfaces. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013, 103, 172101. (29) Lin, K.; Cheng, H.; Hsu, H.; Hsieh, W. Band Gap Engineering and Spatial Confinement of Optical Phonon in ZnO Quantum Dots. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006, 88, 263117. (30) Omata, T.; Takahashi, K.; Hashimoto, S.; Maeda, Y.; Nose, K.; Otsuka-Yao-Matsuo, S.; Kanaori, K. UV Luminescent OrganicCapped ZnO Quantum Dots Synthesized by Alkoxide Hydrolysis with Dilute Water. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2011, 355, 274−281. (31) Wang, D.; Wang, F.; Wang, Y.; Fan, Y.; Zhao, B.; Zhao, D. Interfacial Emission Adjustment in ZnO Quantum Dots/p-GaN Heterojunction Light-Emitting Diodes. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 2798−2803. (32) Kraut, E. A.; Grant, R. W.; Waldrop, J. R.; Kowalczyk, S. P. Precise Determination of the Valence-Band Edge in X-Ray Photoemission Spectra: Application to Measurement of Semiconductor Interface Potentials. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1980, 44, 1620−1623. (33) Iatsunskyi, I.; Kempiński, M.; Jancelewicz, M.; Załęski, K.; Jurga, S.; Smyntyna, V. Structural and XPS Characterization of ALD Al2O3 Coated Porous Silicon. Vacuum 2015, 113, 52−58. (34) Gao, K. Y.; Seyller, T.; Ley, L.; Ciobanu, F.; Pensl, G.; Tadich, A.; Riley, J. D.; Leckey, R. G. C. Al2O3 Prepared by Atomic Layer Deposition as Gate Dielectric on 6H-SiC(0001). Appl. Phys. Lett. 2003, 83, 1830−1832. (35) Tauc, J.; Grigorovici, R.; Vancu, A. Optical Properties and Electronic Structure of Amorphous Germanium. Phys. Status Solidi B 1966, 15, 627−637. (36) Lin, K. F.; Cheng, H. M.; Hsu, H. C.; Lin, L. J.; Hsieh, W. F. Band Gap Variation of Size-Controlled ZnO Quantum Dots Synthesized by Sol-Gel Method. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2005, 409, 208− 211. (37) McCluskey, M. D.; Jokela, S. J. Defects in ZnO. J. Appl. Phys. 2009, 106, 0−13. (38) Hofmann, D. M.; Hofstaetter, A.; Leiter, F.; Zhou, H.; Henecker, F.; Meyer, B. K.; Orlinskii, S. B.; Schmidt, J.; Baranov, P. G. Hydrogen: A Relevant Shallow Donor in Zinc Oxide. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2002, 88, 4. (39) Sahai, A.; Goswami, N. Probing the Dominance of Interstitial Oxygen Defects in ZnO Nanoparticles through Structural and Optical Characterizations. Ceram. Int. 2014, 40, 14569−14578. (40) Watts, J. F.; Wolstenholme, J. An Introduction to Surface Analysis by XPS and AES; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd: Chichester, UK, 2003.

(2) Dai, X.; Deng, Y.; Peng, X.; Jin, Y. Quantum-Dot Light-Emitting Diodes for Large-Area Displays: Towards the Dawn of Commercialization. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1607022. (3) Ramasamy, P.; Kim, N.; Kang, Y. S.; Ramirez, O.; Lee, J. S. Tunable, Bright, and Narrow-Band Luminescence from Colloidal Indium Phosphide Quantum Dots. Chem. Mater. 2017, 29, 6893− 6899. (4) Li, L.; Reiss, P. One-Pot Synthesis of Highly Luminescent InP/ ZnS Nanocrystals without Precursor Injection. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 11588−11589. (5) Levchuk, I.; Osvet, A.; Tang, X.; Brandl, M.; Perea, J. D.; Hoegl, F.; Matt, G. J.; Hock, R.; Batentschuk, M.; Brabec, C. J. Brightly Luminescent and Color-Tunable Formamidinium Lead Halide Perovskite FAPbX 3 (X = Cl, Br, I) Colloidal Nanocrystals. Nano Lett. 2017, 17, 3993−3993. (6) Li, X.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, S.; Cai, B.; Gu, Y.; Song, J.; Zeng, H. CsPbX 3 Quantum Dots for Lighting and Displays: RoomTemperature Synthesis, Photoluminescence Superiorities, Underlying Origins and White Light-Emitting Diodes. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2016, 26, 2435−2445. (7) Makino, T.; Tamura, K.; Chia, C. H.; Segawa, Y.; Kawasaki, M.; Ohtomo, A.; Koinuma, H. Temperature Quenching of Exciton Luminescence Intensity in ZnO/(Mg,Zn)O Multiple Quantum Wells. J. Appl. Phys. 2003, 93, 5929−5933. (8) Zhao, H.; Liang, H.; Vidal, F.; Rosei, F.; Vomiero, A.; Ma, D. Size Dependence of Temperature-Related Optical Properties of PbS and PbS/CdS Core/Shell Quantum Dots. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 20585−20593. (9) Zhao, Y.; Riemersma, C.; Pietra, F.; Koole, R.; de Mello Donegá, C.; Meijerink, A. High-Temperature Luminescence Quenching of Colloidal Quantum Dots. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 9058−9067. (10) Bachmann, V.; Ronda, C.; Meijerink, A. Temperature Quenching of Yellow Ce3+ Luminescence in YAG:Ce. Chem. Mater. 2009, 21, 2077−2084. (11) Christensen, A.; Graham, S. Thermal Effects in Packaging High Power Light Emitting Diode Arrays. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2009, 29, 364−371. (12) Ghosh Chaudhuri, R.; Paria, S. Core/Shell Nanoparticles: Classes, Properties, Synthesis Mechanisms, Characterization, and Applications. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 2373−2433. (13) Nan, W.; Niu, Y.; Qin, H.; Cui, F.; Yang, Y.; Lai, R.; Lin, W.; Peng, X. Crystal Structure Control of Zinc-Blende CdSe/CdS Core/ Shell Nanocrystals: Synthesis and Structure-Dependent Optical Properties. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 19685−19693. (14) Reiss, P.; Protière, M.; Li, L. Core/Shell Semiconductor Nanocrystals. Small 2009, 5, 154−168. (15) Arunkumar, P.; Gil, K. H.; Won, S.; Unithrattil, S.; Kim, Y. H.; Kim, H. J.; Im, W. B. Colloidal Organolead Halide Perovskite with a High Mn Solubility Limit: A Step Toward Pb-Free Luminescent Quantum Dots. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2017, 8, 4161−4166. (16) Zhang, J.; Yang, Y.; Deng, H.; Farooq, U.; Yang, X.; Khan, J.; Tang, J.; Song, H. High Quantum Yield Blue Emission from LeadFree Inorganic Antimony Halide Perovskite Colloidal Quantum Dots. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 9294−9302. (17) Huang, H.; Dun, C.; Huang, W.; Cui, Y.; Xu, J.; Jiang, Q.; Xu, C.; Zhang, H.; Wen, S.; Carroll, D. L. Solution-Processed YellowWhite Light-Emitting Diodes Based on Mixed-Solvent Dispersed Luminescent ZnO Nanocrystals. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2015, 106, 1−6. (18) Panigrahi, S.; Bera, A.; Basak, D. Ordered Dispersion of ZnO Quantum Dots in SiO2Matrix and Its Strong Emission Properties. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2011, 353, 30−38. (19) Son, D. I.; You, C. H.; Kim, W. T.; Kim, T. W. White LightEmitting Diodes Fabricated Utilizing Hybrid Polymer-Colloidal ZnO Quantum Dots. Nanotechnology 2009, 20, 365206. (20) Mahjoub, M. A.; Monier, G.; Robert-Goumet, C.; Reveret, F.; Echabaane, M.; Chaudanson, D.; Petit, M.; Bideux, L.; Gruzza, B. Synthesis and Study of Stable and Size-Controlled ZnO-SiO2 Quantum Dots: Application as a Humidity Sensor. J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120, 11652−11662. 1726

DOI: 10.1021/acsphotonics.9b00382 ACS Photonics 2019, 6, 1715−1727

ACS Photonics

Article

(41) Fadley, C. S.; Hagstrom, S. B. M.; Klein, M. P.; Shirley, D. A. Chemical Effects on Core-Electron Binding Energies in Iodine and Europium. J. Chem. Phys. 1968, 48, 3779−3794. (42) Siegbahn, K. ESCA: Atomic, Molecular and Solid State Structure Studied by Means of Electron Spectroscopy. Nov.act.uppsaliensis, 1967. (43) Leyre, S.; Hanselaer, P.; Fyen, W.; Sels, B.; Hofkens, J. Determination and Optimization of the Luminescence External Quantum E Ffi Ciency of Silver-Clusters Zeolite Composites. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 6998−7004. (44) Gargas, D. J.; Gao, H.; Wang, H.; Yang, P. High Quantum Efficiency of Band-Edge Emission from ZnO Nanowires. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 3792−3796. (45) Pålsson, L.-O.; Monkman, A. P. Measurements of Solid-State Photoluminescence Quantum Yields of Films Using a Fluorimeter. Adv. Mater. 2002, 14, 757. (46) de Mello, J. C.; Wittmann, H. F.; Friend, R. H. An Improved Experimental Determination of External Photoluminescence Quantum Efficiency. Adv. Mater. 1997, 9, 230−232. (47) Leroux, M.; Grandjean, N.; Beaumont, B.; Nataf, G.; Semond, F.; Massies, J.; Gibart, P. Temperature Quenching of Photoluminescence Intensities in Undoped and Doped GaN. J. Appl. Phys. 1999, 86, 3721−3728. (48) Grosso, G.; Parravicini, G. P. Solid State Physics. In Solid State Physics; Elsevier: Singapore, 2014. (49) Würth, C.; Grabolle, M.; Pauli, J.; Spieles, M.; Resch-Genger, U. Relative and Absolute Determination of Fluorescence Quantum Yields of Transparent Samples. Nat. Protoc. 2013, 8, 1535−1550. (50) Würth, C.; Grabolle, M.; Pauli, J.; Spieles, M.; Resch-Genger, U. Comparison of Methods and Achievable Uncertainties for the Relative and Absolute Measurement of Photoluminescence Quantum Yields. Anal. Chem. 2011, 83, 3431−3439. (51) Al-Suleiman, M. A. M.; Bakin, A.; Waag, A. Mechanisms for High Internal Quantum Efficiency of ZnO Nanorods. J. Appl. Phys. 2009, 106, 063111. (52) Chen, J.; Aé, L.; Aichele, C.; Lux-Steiner, M. C. High Internal Quantum Efficiency ZnO Nanorods Prepared at Low Temperature. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2008, 92, 161906. (53) Hangleiter, A.; Fuhrmann, D.; Grewe, M.; Hitzel, F.; Klewer, G.; Lahmann, S.; Netzel, C.; Riedel, N.; Rossow, U. Towards Understanding the Emission Efficiency of Nitride Quantum Wells. phys. stat. sol. 2004, 201, 2808−2813. (54) Wang, A.; Shen, H.; Zang, S.; Lin, Q.; Wang, H.; Qian, L.; Niu, J.; Song Li, L. Bright, Efficient, and Color-Stable Violet ZnSe-Based Quantum Dot Light-Emitting Diodes. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 2951−2959. (55) Diroll, B. T.; Murray, C. B. High-Temperature Photoluminescence of CdSe/CdS Core/Shell Nanoheterostructures. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 6466−6474. (56) Rainò, G.; Stöferle, T.; Moreels, I.; Gomes, R.; Kamal, J. S.; Hens, Z.; Mahrt, R. F. Probing the Wave Function Delocalization in CdSe/CdS Dot-in-Rod Nanocrystals by Time- and TemperatureResolved Spectroscopy. ACS Nano 2011, 5, 4031−4036.

1727

DOI: 10.1021/acsphotonics.9b00382 ACS Photonics 2019, 6, 1715−1727