Polymetallic Oxalate-Based 2D Magnets: Soluble Molecular

Mar 26, 2010 - Gonzalo Abellán , Carlos Martí-Gastaldo , Antonio Ribera , and ... Imanol de Pedro , Jesús A. Blanco , José R. García , and José Gimeno...
2 downloads 0 Views 5MB Size
Download PDF
Published on Web 03/26/2010

Polymetallic Oxalate-Based 2D Magnets: Soluble Molecular Precursors for the Nanostructuration of Magnetic Oxides Eugenio Coronado,*,† Carlos Martı´-Gastaldo,† Jose´ R. Gala´n-Mascaro´s,‡ and Massimiliano Cavallini§ Instituto de Ciencia Molecular (ICMol), UniVersidad de Valencia, Polı´gono de la Coma s/n, 46980 Paterna, Spain, Institute of Chemical Research of Catalonia (ICIQ), AV. Paı¨sos Catalans 16, 43007 Tarragona, Spain, and CNR-Institute of Nanostructured Materials (ISMN), Via P. Gobetti 101, 40129 Bologna, Italy Received January 11, 2010; E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract: Here we describe the synthesis and magnetic characterization of a family of 2D polymetallic oxalate-bridged polymeric networks with general formula [MII(H2O)2]3[MIII(ox)3]2(18-crown-6)2 (MIII ) Cr, Fe; MII ) Mn, Fe, Co, Ni; 18-crown-6 ) C12H24O6). Depending on the nature of the trivalent metal ion, they exhibit ferro- (Cr3+) or ferrimagnetic (Fe3+) ordering in the 3.6-20 K interval. In contrast with most of the oxalate-bridged CPs reported so far, these complexes do not need any additional templating cation for their assembly and represent the first series of oxalate-based polymeric networks which can be considered intrinsically neutral. As previously observed for other crown ether containing oxalate-based coordination polymers, these compounds are soluble in water, whereas they remain nonsoluble in other organic solvents. Furthermore, when these molecular precursors are subjected to a thermally controlled decomposition process, pure phases of mixed oxides with spinel-like structures can be conveniently generated. Among the resulting materials, the (Mn,Co,Fe)3O4 derivative is particularly remarkable, since it behaves as a magnet at room temperature. Finally, taking advantage of the solubility of these molecular precursors, this roomtemperature magnetic oxide has been successfully nanostructured onto a Si(110) substrate via the lithographically controlled wetting (LCW) technique.

Introduction

For the last three decades, molecule-based magnetic materials have demonstrated their ability to mimic and even go beyond the physical properties exhibited by classical inorganic solids.1 The most successful molecule-based magnets in this “competition” are based in coordination polymers (CPs) composed of transition-metal ions (spin carriers) bridged by small organic ligands able to promote strong enough magnetic exchange.2 In these molecule-based materials, properties such as flexibility, transparency, low density, and biocompatibility can be combined not only with the magnetism but also with more sophisticated functionalities, thus permitting the design of advanced multifunctional molecular materials such as ferromagnetic conductors,3 photo and piezo switching magnets,4 chiral magnets,5 multiferroics,6 and hybrid magnets incorporating spin crossover molecules.7 Probably one of the most representative ligands to illustrate the versatility of the chemical approach toward the development of this class of materials has been the oxalate linker (ox ) C2O42-). According to the generally followed bimetallic ap†

Universidad de Valencia (ICMol). Institute of Chemical Research of Catalonia (ICIQ). § NR-Institute of Nanostructured Materials (ISMN). (1) (a) Miller, J. S.; Epstein, A. J. MRS Bull.: Molecule-Based Magnets 2000, 25, 21–28. (b) Miller, J. S. AdV. Mater. 1990, 2, 98–99. (2) (a) Day, P.; Underhill, A. E. Metal-Organic and Organic Molecular Magnets; Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge, U.K., 2000; Spec. Publ. R. Soc. Chem. Vol. 252. (b) Kurmoo, M. Chem. Soc. ReV. 2009, 38, 1353–1379. ‡

5456

9

J. AM. CHEM. SOC. 2010, 132, 5456–5468

proach, homoleptic [MIII(ox)3]3- complexes (MIII ) Cr, Fe, V, Ru, Mn) can be employed as chelating ligands against paramagnetic divalent metal ions, resulting in the formation of discrete oligomeric species which remain in solution because of their charged nature. In a final step, the addition of a cationic molecule promotes the assembling of a layered salt, which can then be isolated from solution. The broad number of magnetic materials obtained through this synthetic route has permitted us to postulate a direct relation between the size, charge, and geometry of the monovalent cation and the dimensionality and symmetry of the resulting oxalate-based architectures. In this way, different cations have templated the formation of different magnetic networks. Whereas alkylic bulky monocations usually lead to the formation of 2D honeycomb-like hexagonal networks exhibiting ferromagnetic, ferrimagnetic, or weak ferromagnetic ordering,8 the employment of tris-bipyridyl chiral complexes yields homochiral 3D networks which exhibit ferro- and ferrimagnetic ordering at temperatures lower than for their 2D counterparts.9 More exotic 3D structures with a predominance (3) Coronado, E.; Gala´n-Mascaro´s, J. R.; Go´mez-Garcı´a, C. J.; Laukhin, V. Nature 2000, 408, 447–449. (4) (a) Be´nard, S.; Yu, P.; Audie´re, J. P.; Rivie´re, V.; Cle`ment, R.; Ghilhelm, J.; Tchertanov, L.; Nakatani, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 9444–9454. (b) Sato, O.; Iyoda, T.; Fujishima, A.; Hashimoto, K. Science 1996, 272, 704–705. (c) Bleuzen, A.; Lomenech, C.; Escax, V.; Villain, F.; Varret, F.; Cartier, C.; Verdaguer, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 6648–6652. (d) Coronado, E.; Gime´nez-Lo´pez, M. C.; Korzeniak, T.; Levchenko, G.; Romero, F. M.; Segura, A.; Garcı´aBaonza, V.; Cezar, J. C.; de Groot, F. M. F.; Milner, A.; Paz-Pasternak, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 15519–15532. 10.1021/ja100261z  2010 American Chemical Society

Polymetallic Oxalate-Based 2D Magnets

of antiferromagnetic interactions can be also prepared by introducing organic radicals of the nitronyl nitroxide type.10 Moreover, we recently demonstrated how the combination of two different cations in a layered material permitted us to observe the single chain magnet behavior of an oxalate-based chain for the first time, as result of the strict control on the intensity of the dipolar interactions operating between the layers in the solid state.11 In this same direction, we have extensively studied the introduction of the planar [K(18-crown-6)]+ complex (18-crown-6 ) C12H24O6) in oxalate-based magnetic materials and illustrated how it promotes a reduction in their dimensionality, leading to less connected 2D anionic layers and even 1D systems, when their growth is assisted with auxiliary capping ligands.12 These systems also behave as bulk magnets, though at lower temperatures than for their 2D counterparts. These examples stress the templating role played by the cationic molecule and, which is more important, the essential value of couloumbic interactions in directing the assembling of the molecular species in solution and determining the (5) (a) Minguet, M.; Luneau, D.; Lhotel, E.; Villar, V.; Paulsen, C.; Amabilino, D. B.; Veciana, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 586– 589. (b) Inoue, K.; Kikuchi, K.; Ohba, M.; Okawa, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 4810–4813. (c) Coronado, E.; Gala´n-Mascar´os, J. R.; Go´mez-Garcı´a, C. J.; Murcia-Martı´nez, A. Chem. Eur. J. 2006, 12, 3484–3492. (d) Train, C.; Gheorge, R.; Krstic, V.; Chamoreau, L.M.; Ovanesyan, N. S.; Rikken, G. L. J. A.; Gruselle, M.; Verdaguer, M. Nat. Mater. 2008, 7, 729–734. (e) Train, C.; Nuida, T.; Gheorghe, R.; Gruselle, M.; Ohkoshi, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 16838– 16843. (6) Ohkoshi, S.; Tokoro, H.; Matsuda, T.; Takahashi, H.; Irie, H.; Hashimoto, K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 3238–3241. (7) (a) Floquet, S.; Salunke, S.; Boillot, M.-L.; Cle´ment, R.; Varret, F.; Boukheddaden, K.; Rivie`re, E. Chem. Mater. 2002, 14, 4164–4171. (b) Floquet, S.; Mun˜oz, M. C.; Rivie`re, E.; Cle´ment, R.; Audie`re, J. P.; Boillot, M. L. New J. Chem. 2004, 28, 535–541. (c) Clemente-Leo´n, M.; Coronado, E.; Gime´nez-Lo´pez, M. C.; Soriano-Portillo, A.; Waerenborgh, J. C.; Delgado, F. S.; Ruiz-Pe´rez, C. Inorg. Chem. 2008, 47, 9111–9120. (8) (a) Tamaki, H.; Zhong, Z. J.; Matsumoto, N.; Kida, S.; Koikawa, M.; Achiwa, N.; Hashimoto, Y.; Okawa, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 6974–6979. (b) Okawa, H.; Matsumoto, N.; Tamaki, H.; Ohba, M. Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 1993, 232, 617–622. (c) Tamaki, H.; Mitsumi, M.; Nakamura, K.; Matsumoto, N.; Kida, S.; Okawa, H.; Iijima, S. Chem. Lett. 1992, 1975–1978. (d) Mathoniere, C.; Carling, S. G.; Dou, Y. S.; Day, P. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1994, 1551–1552. (e) Mathoniere, C.; Nuttall, C. J.; Carling, S. G.; Day, P. Inorg. Chem. 1996, 35, 1201–1206. (f) Coronado, E.; Galan-Mascaro´s, J. R.; Go´mezGarcı´a, C. J.; Martı´nez-Agudo, J. M.; Martı´nez-Ferrero, E.; Waerenborgh, J. C.; Almeida, M. J. Solid State Chem. 2001, 159, 391–402. (g) Min, K. S.; Miller, J. S. Dalton Trans. 2006, 2463–2467. (h) Coronado, E.; Gala´n-Mascaro´s, J. R.; Martı´-Gastaldo, C. J. Mater. Chem. 2006, 16, 2685–2689. (9) (a) Pellaux, R.; Schmalle, H. W.; Huber, R.; Fischer, P.; Hauss, T.; Ouladdiaf, B.; Decurtins, S. Inorg. Chem. 1997, 36, 2301–2308. (b) Decurtins, S.; Schmalle, H. W.; Schneuwly, P.; Oswald, H. R. Inorg. Chem. 1993, 32, 1888–1892. (c) Decurtins, S.; Schmalle, H. W.; Schneuwly, P.; Ensling, J.; Gu¨tlich, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 9521–9528. (d) Hernandez-Molina, M.; Lloret, F.; Ruiz-Pe´rez, C.; Julve, M. Inorg. Chem. 1998, 37, 4131–4135. (e) Coronado, E.; Gala´nMascaro´s, J. R.; Go´mez-Garcı´a, C. J.; Martı´nez-Agudo, J. M. Inorg. Chem. 2001, 40, 113–120. (f) Pointillart, F.; Train, C.; Gruselle, M.; Villain, F.; Schmalle, H. W.; Talbot, D.; Gredin, P.; Decurtins, S.; Verdaguer, M. Chem. Mater. 2004, 16, 832–841. (g) Clemente-Leo´n, M.; Coronado, E.; Go´mez-Garcı´a, C. J.; Soriano-Portillo, A. Inorg. Chem. 2006, 45, 5653–5660. (10) (a) Ballester, G.; Coronado, E.; Gime´nez-Saiz, C.; Romero, F. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 792–795. (11) Coronado, E.; Gala´n-Mascaro´s, J. R.; Martı´-Gastaldo, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 14987-14988; CrystEngComm 2009, 11, 2143-2153. (12) (a) Coronado, E.; Gala´n-Mascaro´s, J. R.; Go´mez-Garcı´a, C. J.; Martı´Gastaldo, C. Inorg. Chem. 2005, 44, 6197–6202. (b) Coronado, E.; Gala´n-Mascaro´s, J. R.; Martı´-Gastaldo, C. Polyhedron 2007, 26, 2101– 2104. (c) Coronado, E.; Gala´n-Mascaro´s, J. R.; Martı´-Gastaldo, C.; Waerenborgh, J. C.; Gaczynski, P. Inorg. Chem. 2008, 47, 6829–6839.

ARTICLES

dimensionality and physical properties of the resulting oxalatebased CP. In our opinion the development of novel, even more complex oxalate-bridged magnetic topologies should be feasible through controlling not only covalent bonding or anion/cation electrostatic interactions but also the less intense but equally determinant supramolecular interactions. In this regard, the importance of hydrogen-bonding interactions in the construction of oxalate-based magnets was recently pointed out in a 2D ferromagnet formed by neutral bimetallic layers: {[Co(H2O)2]3[Cr(ox)3]2(18-crown-6)2}.13 In this system the templating role, typically attributed to cationic moieties, was effectively substituted by the presence of hydrogen-bonding interactions between the neutral crown ether molecule guest and the oxalatebridged bimetallic neutral CP host, thus constituting the first example of an intrinsically neutral “cation-less” oxalate-based magnet. In the first part of this work we will show how this synthetic strategy can be extended to different paramagnetic metal ions, leading to a family of 2D layered magnets with the general formula {[MII(H2O)2]3[MIII(ox)3]2(18-crown-6)2} (MIII ) Cr, Fe; MII ) Mn, Fe, Co, Ni). In the second part, according to the “molecules-to-materials” route previously described for other oxalate complexes,14 we will show how these molecular materials can be subjected to controlled thermal decomposition, generating pure phases of crystalline mixed oxides with spinellike structures, which behave as bulk magnets even at room temperature. Finally, the solubility in water of these molecular oxalate-based precursors will be exploited to accomplish the organization of magnetic oxides in the nanoscale using the lithographically controlled wetting (LCW) technique, an unconventional lithographic method15 which has already been successfully applied to other magnetic hybrid materials.16 Experimental Section Synthesis. All chemicals (H2C2O4, Na2C2O4 · H2O, K2Cr2O7, AgNO3, TlNO3, MnCl2 · 4H2O, FeCl2 · 4H2O, CoCl2 · 6H2O, NiCl2 · 6H2O, CuCl2 · 2H2O, 18-crown-6) and solvents (water, methanol) used were of commercially available grade and were used without any previous purification. K3[MIII(ox)3] (MIII ) Cr, Fe) complexes were prepared according to previously described methods.17 The Ag3[Cr(ox)3] derivative was obtained by metathesis of the potassium salt as follows: K3[Cr(ox)3] (3 mmol; 1.30 g) was dissolved in the minimum amount of water. Simultaneously, a saturated aqueous solution of AgNO3 (4 mmol; 0.67 g) was prepared and subsequently added to the K3[Cr(ox)3] solution. In a few minutes quantitative precipitation of the Ag3[Cr(ox)3] complex was observed. The purple (13) Coronado, E.; Gala´n-Mascaro´s, J. R.; Martı´-Gastaldo, C. Inorg. Chem. 2007, 46, 8108–8110. (14) (a) Neo, K. E.; Ong, Y. Y.; Huynh, H. V.; Hor, T. S. A. J. Mater. Chem. 2007, 17, 1002–1006. (b) Boudaren, C.; Auffre´dic, J. P.; Loue¨r, M.; Loue¨r., D. Chem. Mater. 2000, 12, 2324–2333. (15) (a) Cavallini, M.; Albonetti, C.; Biscarini, F. AdV. Mater. 2009, 21, 1043–1053. (b) Cavallini, M. J. Mater. Chem. 2009, 19, 6085–6092. (c) Corradini, V.; Menozzi, C.; Cavallini, M.; Biscarini, F.; Betti, M. G.; Mariani, C. Surf. Sci. 2003, 532, 249–254. (d) Leclere, P.; Surin, M.; Lazzaroni, R.; Kilbinger, A. F. M.; Henze, O.; Jonkheijm, P.; Biscarini, F.; Cavallini, M.; Feast, W. J.; Meijer, E. W.; Schenning, A. J. Mater. Chem. 2004, 14, 1959–1963. (16) (a) Cavallini, M.; Biscarini, F.; Gomez-Segura, J.; Ruiz, D.; Veciana, J. Nano Lett. 2003, 3, 1527–1530. (b) Leyva, A. G.; Stoliar, P.; Rosenbusch, M.; Lorenzo, V.; Levy, P.; Albonetti, C.; Cavallini, M.; Biscarini, F.; Troiani, H. E.; Curiale, J.; Sanchez, R. D. J. Solid State Chem. 2004, 177, 3949–3953. (c) Cavallini, M.; Facchini, M.; Albonetti, C.; Biscarini, F. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2008, 10, 784– 793. (d) Cavallini, M.; Bergenti, I.; Milita, S.; Ruani, G.; Salitros, I.; Qu, Z. R.; Chandrasekar, R.; Ruben, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 8596–8600. (17) Baylar, J. M.; Jones, E. M. Inorganic Synthesis; Booth, H. S., Ed.; McGraw-Hill: New York, 1939. J. AM. CHEM. SOC.

9

VOL. 132, NO. 15, 2010

5457

ARTICLES

Coronado et al.

solid was filtered under vacuum, washed thoroughly with cold water, and dried under vacuum. It was stored in the refrigerator and protected from light to avoid further reduction. The Tl3[Fe(ox)3] derivative was prepared by using a previously described synthesis with minor modifications.18 According to that synthesis, a saturated solution of [Fe(ox)3]3-(aq) was prepared by dissolving its potassium salt (3 mmol; 1.47 g) in the minimum amount of water. Next, a freshly prepared aqueous solution containing an excess of TlNO3 (4.5 mmol; 1.20 g) was added drop by drop. Afterwards, the resulting green solution was protected from light and left to stand overnight. The next morning, the green prismatic crystals that formed were filtered, washed thoroughly with methanol, and dried in air. The product was stored in the refrigerator and protected from light to avoid further reduction. {[Co(H2O)2]3[Cr(ox)3]2(18-crown-6)2} (1). Compound 1 was prepared as follows. Ag3[Cr(ox)3] (2 mmol; 1.4 g) and CoCl2 · 6H2O (3 mmol; 0.72 g) were suspended in 15 mL of methanol and mechanically stirred for 20 min. The resulting AgCl white precipitate was removed by filtration. Next, solid 18-crown-6 (2 mmol; 0.53 g) was added dropwise onto the purple solution and the resulting mixture was stirred. Although the product formation was observed within 15 min, stirring was maintained for a longer period of time. The purple solid was filtered, washed thoroughly with cold methanol, and dried under vacuum. Anal. Calcd for C36H60Co3Cr2O42 (Mw ) 1445.63): C, 29.91; H, 4.18. Found: C, 29.63; H, 4.18. FT-IR: ν[C-H] 2917, 2891, 1461, 1438 cm-1; ν[CdO] 1698, 1662, 1628 cm-1; ν[C-O] 1407, 1353, 1299, 1273 cm-1; ν[C-O] 1104 cm--1; ν[C-C] 959, 912 cm-1; ν[O-CdO] 822, 810 cm-1; ν[M-O] 544, 474, 432, 412 cm-1. Single crystals of 1 suitable for X-ray crystallography were prepared by slow diffusion experiments as described somewhere else.13 {[Mn(H2O)2]3[Cr(ox)3]2(18-crown-6)2} (2). Compound 2 was prepared as for 1, but using MnCl2 · 4H2O (3 mmol; 0.60 g) instead of CoCl2 · 6H2O. 2 was isolated as a pale purple solid. It was washed thoroughly with cold methanol and dried under vacuum. Anal. Calcd for C36H60Mn3Cr2O42 (Mw ) 1433.65): C, 30.16; H, 4.22. Found: C, 30.04; H, 4.24. FT-IR: ν[C-H] 2915, 2885, 1460, 1434 cm-1; ν[CdO] 1665, 1631 cm-1; ν[C-O] 1398, 1342, 1301 cm-1; ν[C-O] 1108 cm--1; ν[C-C] 907 cm-1; ν[O-CdO] 825, 809 cm-1; ν[M-O] 539, 481, 435, 414 cm-1. {[Mn(H2O)2]1.5[Ni(H2O)2]1.5[Cr(ox)3]2(18-crown-6)2} (3). Ag3[Cr(ox)3] (2 mmol; 1.4 g) and MnCl2 · 4H2O (1.5 mmol; 0.30 g) were suspended in 15 mL of methanol, and the mixture was mechanically stirred for 20 min. The resulting AgCl white precipitate was removed by filtration. Next, solid NiCl2 · 4H2O (1.5 mmol; 0.30 g) was added to the purple solution and the mixture was stirred for 5 min. Once the Ni2+ complex was dissolved, 18crown-6 (2 mmol; 0.53 g) was added dropwise onto the solution and the resulting mixture was stirred for 60 min. The resulting purple solid was filtered, washed thoroughly with cold methanol, and dried under vacuum. Anal. Calcd for C36H60Mn1.5Ni1.5Cr2O42 (Mw ) 1439.29): C, 30.04; H, 4.20. Found: C, 29.85; H, 4.14. FTIR: ν[C-H] 2916, 2891, 2833 1461, 1437 cm-1; ν[CdO] 1698, 1628 cm-1; ν[C-O] 1407, 1354, 1299, 1273, 1255 cm-1; ν[C-O] 1104 cm--1; ν[C-C] 958, 912 cm-1; ν[O-CdO] 821, 810 cm-1; ν[M-O] 544, 474, 430, 412 cm-1. {[Co(H2O)2]1.5[Ni(H2O)2]1.5[Cr(ox)3]2(18-crown-6)2} (4). Compound 4 was prepared as for 3 but using CoCl2 · 6H2O (1.5 mmol; 0.36 g) instead of MnCl2 · 4H2O. 4 was isolated as a pale purple solid. It was washed thoroughly with cold methanol and dried under vacuum. Anal. Calcd for C36H60Co1.5Ni1.5Cr2O42 (Mw ) 1445.28): C, 29.92; H, 4.18. Found: C, 30.10; H, 4.22. FT-IR: ν[C-H] 2916, 2891, 1462, 1439 cm-1; ν[CdO] 1699, 1662, 1628 cm-1; ν[C-O] 1407, 1353, 1299, 1255 cm-1; ν[C-O] 1104 cm-1; ν[C-C] 959, 913 cm-1; ν[O-CdO] 821, 811 cm-1; ν[M-O] 545, 473, 433, 413 cm-1. (18) Wyrouboff, G. Bl. Soc. Min. 1900, 23, 120. 5458

J. AM. CHEM. SOC.

9

VOL. 132, NO. 15, 2010

{[Mn(H2O)2]3[Fe(ox)3]2(18-crown-6)2} (5). Tl3[Fe(ox)3] (2 mmol; 1.90 g) and MnCl2 · 4H2O (3 mmol; 0.60 g) were suspended in 15 mL of methanol and mechanically stirred for 20 min. The resulting TlCl white precipitate was removed by filtration. Next, solid 18crown-6 (2 mmol; 0.53 g) was added dropwise onto the yellowish solution and the resulting mixture was stirred for 60 min. The orange solid that formed was filtered, washed thoroughly with cold methanol, dried under vacuum, and stored protected from light. Anal. Calcd for C36H60Mn3Fe2O42 (Mw ) 1441.35): C, 30.0; H, 4.20. Found: C, 30.10; H, 4.18. FT-IR: ν[C-H] 2911, 1456, 1431 cm-1; ν[CdO] 1694, 1625 cm-1; ν[C-O] 1352, 1303, 1255 cm-1; ν[C-O] 1098 cm--1; ν[C-C] 961, 906 cm-1; ν[O-CdO] 842, 805 cm-1; ν[M-O] 535, 483, 417 cm-1. {[Mn(H2O)2]1.5[Co(H2O)2]1.5[Fe(ox)3]2(18-crown-6)2} (6). Tl3[Fe(ox)3] (2 mmol; 1.90 g) and MnCl2 · 4H2O (1.5 mmol; 0.30 g) were suspended in 15 mL of methanol, and the mixture was mechanically stirred for 20 min. The resulting TlCl white precipitate was removed by filtration. Next, solid CoCl2 · 6H2O (1.5 mmol; 0.36 g) was added to the orange solution and the mixture was stirred for 5 min. Once the Co2+ complex was dissolved, 18-crown-6 (2 mmol; 0.53 g) was added dropwise onto the solution and the resulting mixture was stirred for 60 min. The resulting solid exhibited an intense orange color. It was filtered, washed thoroughly with cold methanol, dried under vacuum, and stored protected from light. 6 was isolated as a yellow solid. Anal. Calcd for C36H60Mn1.5Co1.5Fe2O42 (Mw ) 1447.34): C, 29.88; H, 4.18. Found: C, 29.7; H, 4.05. FT-IR: ν[C-H] 2908, 2893, 2827, 1455, 1432 cm-1; ν[CdO] 1689, 1627 cm-1; ν[C-O] 1402, 1351, 1304, 1255 cm-1; ν[C-O] 1106 cm--1; ν[C-C] 960, 906 cm-1; ν[O-CdO] 838, 808 cm-1; ν[M-O] 533, 483, 415 cm-1. {[Fe(H2O)2]3[Fe(ox)3]2(18-crown-6)2} (7). Compound 7 was prepared as for 5 but using FeCl2 · 4H2O (3 mmol; 0.60 g) instead of MnCl2 · 4H2O. 4 was isolated as a yellowish solid. It was washed thoroughly with cold methanol, dried under vacuum, and stored protected from light. Anal. Calcd for C36H60Fe5O42 (Mw ) 1444.07): C, 29.94; H, 4.19. Found: C, 29.73; H, 4.23. FT-IR: ν[C-H] 2907, 1455, 1433 cm-1; ν[CdO] 1694, 1628 cm-1; ν[C-O] 1351, 1300, 1255 cm-1; ν[C-O] 1097 cm--1; ν[C-C] 963, 906 cm-1; ν[O-CdO] 844, 803 cm-1; ν[M-O] 532, 483, 434, 419 cm-1. {[Fe(H2O)2]1.5[Ni(H2O)2]1.5[Fe(ox)3]2(18-crown-6)2} (8). Compound 8 was prepared as for 6 but using NiCl2 · 4H2O (1.5 mmol; 0.30 g) instead of CoCl2 · 6H2O. 8 was isolated as an orange solid. It was washed thoroughly with cold methanol, dried under vacuum, and stored protected from light. Anal. Calcd for C36H60Ni1.5Fe3.5O42 (Mw ) 1448.34): C, 29.85; H, 4.18. Found: C, 29.73; H, 4.20. FTIR: ν[C-H] 2910, 2833, 1459, 1435 cm-1; ν[CdO] 1695, 1624 cm-1; ν[C-O] 1400, 1351, 1301, 1255 cm-1; ν[C-O] 1097 cm-1; ν[C-C] 963, 907 cm-1; ν[O-CdO] 842, 806 cm-1; ν[M-O] 535, 483, 424 cm-1. CoII0.9CoIII0.9CrIII1.2O4 (9). 1 was transferred as a finely divided powder into a porcelain crucible and warmed in a muffle furnace up to 450 °C with a 5 °C/min rate. This temperature was maintained an for additional 45 min. Finally, the system was cooled to room temperature with a -10 °C/min rate. 9 was isolated as a black shiny powder, transferred to a vial, and stored under vacuum: Co1.8Cr1.2O4 (Mw ) 232.47). MnII0.9MnIII0.9CrIII1.2O4 (10). Compound 10 was obtained from 2 by using the same protocol employed for 9. 10 was isolated as a brownish powder, transferred to a vial, and stored under vacuum: Mn1.8Cr1.2O4 (Mw ) 225.28). NiII0.9MnIII0.9CrIII1.2O4 (11). Compound 11 was obtained from 3 by using the same protocol employed for 9. 11 was isolated as a black powder, transferred to a vial, and stored under vacuum: Mn0.9Ni0.9Cr1.2O4 (Mw ) 228.66). NiII0.9CoIII0.9CrIII1.2O4 (12). Compound 12 was obtained from 4 by using the same protocol employed for 9. 12 was isolated as a black powder, transferred to a vial, and stored under vacuum: Co0.9Ni0.9Cr1.2O4 (Mw ) 232.26).

Polymetallic Oxalate-Based 2D Magnets

ARTICLES

Table 1. Main Structural Parameters of 1 Extracted from Ref 13

formula Mw space group a (Å) b (Å) c (Å) V (Å3) Z T (K) λ (Å) Fcalcd (g/cm3) µ (mm-1) 2θ limit (deg) F(000) R1a wR2b

C36H60Co3Cr2O42 1445.63 Pc21n 14.395(4) 15.650(5) 26.670(10) 6008.3(3) 4 293(2) 0.710 73 1.598 1.265 5.18-45.48 7937 0.0615 0.1497

a R1 ) ∑(Fo - Fc)/∑(Fo). b wR2 ) [∑[w(Fo2 - Fc2)2]/∑[w(Fo2)2]]1/2; w ) 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0343P)2 + 2.4502P]; P ) (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3.

(Mn0.9Fe0.9)II,IIIFeIII1.2O4 (13). Compound 13 was obtained from 5 by using the same protocol employed for 9. 13 was isolated as a black powder, transferred to a vial, and stored under vacuum: Mn0.9Fe2.1O4 (Mw ) 230.72). (Mn0.9Co0.9)II,IIIFeIII1.2O4 (14). Compound 14 was obtained from 6 by using the same protocol employed for 9. 14 was isolated as a reddish powder, transferred to a vial, and stored under vacuum: Mn0.9Co0.9Fe1.2O4 (Mw ) 233.50). Physical Characterization. Metallic Composition. The metallic composition of bulk samples was estimated by electron probe microanalysis (EPMA) performed in a Philips SEM XL30 equipped with an EDAX microprobe. Data concerning compounds 1-8 are summarized in Table SI1 (Supporting Information). Oxides have not been included in this study, because they result from the thermal treatment of their molecular precursors. Elemental Analysis. Carbon, nitrogen, and hydrogen contents of 1-8 were determined by microanalytical procedures using an EA 1110 CHNS-O elemental analyzer from CE Instruments. FT-IR Spectroscopy. Infrared spectra were recorded with a FTIR Nicolet 5700 spectrometer in the 4000-400 cm-1 range using powdered samples diluted in KBr pellets (Table SI2, Supporting Information). X-ray Single-Crystal Data Collection and Analysis. A dark purple prismatic single crystal of 1 (0.2 × 0.2 × 0.1 mm) was fixed on a glass fiber using crystallographic grease and mounted on a Kappa CCD diffractometer equipped with graphite-monochromated Mo KR radiation (λ ) 0.710 73 Å). Data were collected at 293 K. Cell refinements and data reduction were performed using the Denzo and Scalepack programs.19 The structure was solved by direct methods using the SIR97 program20 and refined on F2 with the SHELXL-97 program.21 All the non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically. The positions for all the H atoms were calculated, and their thermal parameters were fixed to be 50% larger than those of the atoms to which they are bound. Reference 13 and CCDC 635244 contain the supplementary crystallographic data for 1. It can be obtained free of charge via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/ retrieving.html or from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Center (12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, U.K., fax (+44) 1223-336033, [email protected]). All crystallographic plots were obtained via the CrystalMaker program.22 Crystal, data collection, and refinement parameters for 1 are summarized in Table 1. (19) Otwinowski, Z.; Minor, W. Methods in Enzymology; Carter, C. W., Jr., Sweet, R. M., Eds.; Academic Press: New York, 1997; Vol. 276, pp 307-326. (20) Altomare, A.; Burla, M. C.; Camali, M.; Cascarano, G. L.; Giacovazzo, C.; Guagliardi, A.; Moliterni, A. G. G.; Polidori, G.; Spagna, R. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1999, 32, 115–119. (21) Sheldrick, G. M. SHELXL-97; University of Go¨ttingen, Go¨ttingen, Germany, 1997. (22) CrystalMaker; CrystalMaker Software, Oxford, U.K., 2006.

X-ray Powder Diffraction. X-ray powder profiles of 1-8 were collected at 120(4) K with an Oxford Diffraction Gemini A-Ultra X-ray diffractometer equipped with an Enhance Cu source (λR ) 1.541 84 Å), a 0.5 mm collimator, and a 92 mm diagonal Sapphire CCD detector. Samples were grounded and transferred to a 0.5 mm internal diameter glass capillary. Typically, profiles were collected as step scans over a 15 min period in the 10° < 2θ < 75° range. The theoretical X-ray diffraction pattern for compound 1 was simulated from the atomic coordinates of its crystalline structure by using the CrystalDiffract software package.22 X-ray diffraction data for compounds 1-8 were indexed on an orthorhombic space group and refined using the Unitcell program.23 X-ray powder profiles of 9-14 were collected at 293(2) K with a Bruker-AXS d5005 X-ray diffractometer equipped with 2.2 kW sealed Cu KR source (λR ) 1.541 84 Å), diffracted beam monochromator, rotatory sampler, and scintillation counter detector. Samples were grounded and mounted on a flat sample plate. Typically, profiles were collected as step scans over a 12 h period in the 10° < 2θ < 60° range with a step size of 0.02°. Finally, X-ray diffraction patterns were indexed on a cubic space group and refined using the same program. Magnetic Measurements. Magnetic susceptibility measurements of 2-8 and 9-14 were performed on powdered samples, whereas magnetic measurements of 1 were performed on both hand-collected ground crystals and a polycrystalline sample. No remarkable difference was observed between them. Magnetic data were collected with a Quantum Design MPMS-XL-5 susceptometer equipped with a SQUID sensor and a Quantum Design PPMS-9 model. The latter was used only for the collection of dynamic magnetic measurements at frequencies higher than 1000 Hz. The susceptibility data were corrected from the diamagnetic contributions of the atomic constituents of the samples, as deduced by using Pascal’s constant tables and the samples holder. dc static data were collected in the range 2-300 K with an applied field of 1000 or 100 G (3), and hysteresis loops were collected between -5 and +5 T at 2 K. ac dynamic data were collected in the range 2-25 K (1-8) and 10-300 K (9-14) with an applied alternating field of 3.95 G at different frequencies in the range 1-10 000 Hz. Lithographically Controlled Wetting (LCW). The stamp for LWC was a piece of polycarbonate coated with an Al film that was >100 nm thick. The stamp motif is composed of parallel lines with a periodicity of 1.5 µm, a width of 550 nm, and a depth of 230 ( 15 nm.24 The substrates consist of a 10 × 10 mm2 piece of silicon (110) covered by ∼2 nm of native silicon oxide. They were cleaned by sonication for 2 min in electronic-grade water (millipure quality), 2 min in acetone (Aldrich chromatographic quality), and 2 min in propanol (Aldrich spectroscopic grade quality). Solutions were prepared using deionized water. Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM). Images were recorded with a commercial AFM (NT-MDT) operating in air, in intermittent contact mode (25° with relative humidity 55%). Si3N4 cantilevers, with typical curvature radius of a tip 10 nm, were employed. Magnetic Force Microscopy (MFM). Images were collected with a SMENA MFM (NT-MDT) using the lift mode. Magnetic tips were used as commercially supplied (NT-MDT FMG01/Co). Results and Discussion Synthesis. A total of 14 compounds were synthesized. They can be divided into two different categories: (a) the family of (23) Holland, T. J. B.; Redfern, S. A. T. Mineral. Magn. 1997, 61, 65. (24) (a) Cavallini, M.; Gomez-Segura, J.; Albonetti, C.; Ruiz-Molina, D.; Veciana, J.; Biscarini, F. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 11607–11610. (b) Innocenti, M.; Cattarin, S.; Cavallini, M.; Loglio, F.; Foresti, M. L. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2002, 532, 219–225. (c) Cedeno, C. C.; Seekamp, J.; Kam, A. P.; Hoffmann, T.; Zankovych, S.; Torres, C. M. S.; Menozzi, C.; Cavallini, M.; Murgia, M.; Ruani, G.; Biscarini, F.; Behl, M.; Zentel, R.; Ahopelto, J. Microelectron. Eng. 2002, 6162, 25–31. (d) Simeone, F. C.; Albonetti, C.; Cavallini, M. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 18987–18994. J. AM. CHEM. SOC.

9

VOL. 132, NO. 15, 2010

5459

ARTICLES

Coronado et al.

Table 2. Unit Cell Constants Refined in an Orthorhombic Space Group for 1-8a

b

1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

MIIMIIMIII

a (Å)

b (Å)

c (Å)

V (Å3)

CoCoCr CoCoCr MnMnCr MnNiCr CoNiCr MnFeFe MnCoFe FeFeFe FeNiFe

14.395(4) 14.2(3) 14.3(4) 14.3(3) 14.1(4) 14.4(4) 14.4(5) 14.6(4) 14.5(4)

15.650(5) 15.9(4) 15.8(4) 15.8(4) 15.7(3) 15.6(5) 16.0(4) 15.9(3) 15.5(3)

26.670(10) 27.3(5) 26.8(5) 27.1(4) 27.5(7) 26.9(5) 26.8(5) 27.6(7) 27.1(7)

6008.3(3) 6163(21) 6056(21) 6119(58) 6097(20) 6044(25) 6202(15) 6369(21) 6108(20)

a All data refer to bulk samples apart from 1, which refer to single crystal X-ray diffraction experiments. b Cell parameters estimated from X-ray single crystal diffraction extracted from.13

Table 3. Lattice Parameters Refined in a Cubic Space Group for

9-14

9 10 11 12 13 14

formula

a (Å)

V (Å3)

CoII0.9CoIII0.9CrIII1.2O4 MnII0.9MnIII0.9CrIII1.2O4 NiII0.9MnIII0.9CrIII1.2O4 NiII0.9CoIII0.9CrIII1.2O4 (Mn0.9Fe0.9)II,IIIFeIII1.2O4 (Mn0.9Co0.9)II,IIIFeIII1.2O4

8.18(4) 8.44(4) 8.31(3) 8.22(4) 8.33(4) 8.37(4)

549(8) 601(8) 574(8) 555(8) 579(8) 587(8)

layered 2D oxalate-based magnets (1-8; Table 2) {[MII(H2O)2]3[Cr(ox)3]2(18-crown-6)2} (MIII ) Cr, Fe; MII ) Mn, Fe, Co, Ni), which depending on the nature of the M(III) ion can be further subcategorized into the Cr(III) and Fe(III) series, and (b) the spinel-type intermetallic oxides resulting from their thermal decomposition in air (9-14; Table 3). 1-8 were isolated as bulk materials following the same synthetic route: dropwise addition of the neutral 18-crown-6 molecule to a methanolic solution containing the M(II) metallic cations and the corresponding [MIII(ox)3]3- complex. The desired compounds immediately precipitate from solution after the addition of the crown ether moiety. The addition of a cation to the charged components in solution is not necessary for the assembly of the 2D architectures, constituting a remarkable characteristic of these sorts of materials which have only been observed in a recent example reported by Zhang et al.25 These products are soluble in water, whereas they remain nonsoluble in organic solvents. This chemical property, rarely exhibited by other magnetic CPs,26 was used to obtain good-quality single crystals of 1,13 suitable for X-ray diffraction experiments. Spinel-type intermetallic oxides (9-14) were prepared from the thermal decomposition in air of compounds 1-6 treated in a muffle furnace up to 450 °C under a controlled heating rate. Structure. 1 crystallizes in the Pc21n orthorhombic space group. It is built by neutral layers of [Co(H2O)2]3[Cr(ox)3]2. These layers present “holes” that are occupied by the neutral 18-crown-6 guest molecules (Figure 1). These layers are perpendicular to the ac plane and are related by an inversion center located in the interlayer space. The absence of an interlamellar cation induces an interlayer distance of 7.825 (2) Å, which is remarkably smaller than those exhibited by the classical cation-templated 2D phases (Table 4). In this “cation(25) Zhang, B.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Lia, J.; Zhu, D. Dalton Trans. 2008, 5037. (26) (a) Bellito, C.; Day, P. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1976, 870– 871. (b) Stead, M. J.; Day, P. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1982, 1081–1084. (c) Kou, H.-Z.; Gao, S.; Li, C.-H.; Liao, D.-Z.; Zhou, B.-C.; Wang, R.-J.; Li, Y. Inorg. Chem. 2002, 41, 4756–4762. 5460

J. AM. CHEM. SOC.

9

VOL. 132, NO. 15, 2010

less” phase, each layer is formed by 12-membered rings constituted of six [Cr(ox)3]3- units and six Co2+ atoms. While each chromium atom is shared between three rings, every Co(II) is shared between two neighboring rings. Within these rings, each Co(II) ion is octahedraly coordinated by two bridging bisbidentate µ2-oxalate ligands, belonging to two [Cr(ox)3]3- units, and two water molecules. We can observe two different types of Co2+ ions, Co1 and Co2, in a 2:1 ratio. Whereas in Co1 the two water molecules appear in a cis conformation, in Co2 they are bonded in a trans fashion. Each [Cr(ox)3]3- binds two Co2 and one Co1 center. In the 12-membered rings the metallic centers exhibit alternating chirality with a repeating pattern ...Co2Λ∆Λ∆ΛCo2..., with nonchiral Co2 ions connecting two Cr3+ atoms with opposite chirality. Both Co2+ centers adopt regular octahedral coordination, with Co-Oox and Co-Ow distances between 2.094(2) and 2.149(2) and between 2.030 and 2.084(2) Å, respectively. The bonding angles slightly deviate from regular octahedral geometry due to the bite angle of the oxalate ligands (Oox-Co-Oox between 78.097 and 79.879°). The local distortion observed in the Cr atom coordination sphere is less intense than that for the Co atoms, with shorter Cr-Oox distance values (between 1.957 and 2.017(2) Å) and less acute angles for the oxalate bridge (Oox-Cr-Oox in the 81.227-82.730° range). Hydrogen-bonding interactions play a key role in the formation of this sort of compound (Figure 2). The two crown ether molecules located in the middle of each 12-membered structural unit are interacting through their oxygen atoms with the bonded water molecules. While the Ow · · · OCrown distances for the water molecules coordinated in a cis fashion are in the 2.672(2)-3.049(2) Å range, they range between 2.780(2) and 2.989(2) Å for the trans molecules. Most relevant hydrogenbonding distances for compound 1 are summarized in Table SI3 (Supporting Information). These values are in good agreement with previously reported hydrogen-bonding interactions between coordinated water molecules and crown ether oxygen atoms.27 1 was additionally obtained as a polycrystalline powder together with 2-8. All of them were structurally characterized by powder X-ray diffraction. All compounds seem to be isostructural, exhibiting quite analogous diffraction patterns to that simulated from the atomic positional parameters of 1 (Figure SI4, Supporting Information).13 Cell parameters were obtained from the indexation of the most intense reflections in an orthorhombic crystalline system (Table 2). Figure SI5 (Supporting Information) shows the X-ray diffraction pattern of mixed oxides 9-14, as resulting from the thermal decomposition of the oxalate-based precursors. They exhibit the typical diffraction pattern for spinel-type oxides with a low-intensity secondary diffraction peak centered on 35.5°. This peak suggests the formation of a residual amount of a contaminant oxide phase together with the spinels during the thermal treatment. The unit cell parameters obtained from the indexation of the main reflections in a cubic space group are summarized in Table 3. All of them are within the range of lattice constants typically attributed to spinel-like oxides containing transition-metal ions. Note that the (311) peak is slightly shifted, depending on the nature of the metallic ions composing the oxide. This fact has previously been observed and attributed to the different ionic radii: larger ions yield larger cell parameters, and accordingly the peak is shifted to smaller (27) (a) Rogers, R. D.; Kurihara, L. K.; Benning, M. M. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1988, 1, 13–16. (b) Steed, J. W.; Junk, P. C. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1999, 13, 2141–2146.

Polymetallic Oxalate-Based 2D Magnets

ARTICLES

Figure 1. Perspective showing (a) the structure of the neutral polymeric layers of 1 and (b) the packing of these layers along the b axis: Cr, pink; Co, blue;

O, red; C, black. Hydrogen atoms have been omitted for the sake of simplicity. Table 4. Interlayer Distances of Several Cation-Templated 2D Oxalate-Based Magnetsa cation

2D network

dinter (Å)

no. of peaks fitted

ref

N(n-C3H7)4 N(n-C4H9)4 P(n-C4H9)4 FeIIICp*2 N(C6H5CH2)(n-C4H9)3 P(C6H5)4 As(C6H5)4 N(n-C5H11)4 (C6H5)3PNP(C6H5)3

II

8.19 8.93 9.20 9.28 9.43 9.55 9.57 10.16 14.52

16 singlecrystal 11 singlecrystal 12 singlecrystal 9 11 13

8e 42 8e 43 8e 44 8e 8e 8e

III

Mn Fe MnIICrIII MnIIFeIII MnIICrIII MnIIFeIII MnIICrIII MnIIFeIII MnIIFeIII MnIIFeIII

a Note that some distances have been extracted from single-crystal X-ray data, whereas others have been estimated from least-squares fitting of the powder diffraction data.

diffraction angles.28 Spinels are composed of oxide anions arranged in a cubic close-packed lattice and metallic cations, which can be divalent or trivalent, occupying some or all of the octahedral (Oh) and tetrahedral (Td) vacant positions in the lattice. In the “normal spinel” structure, MII cations occupy

the tetrahedral sites of the oxide lattice and MIII cations the octahedral sites. For inverse spinels, half the MIII cations occupy the tetrahedral sites, and both MII and MIII cations occupy the octahedral sites. According to experimental reports, depending on the synthetic protocol employed, partial inversion of the spinel structure can occur in some cases.29 Given that the Td and Oh sites in the lattice generate different crystal field stabilization energies, crystal field theory has been widely invoked to explain the distribution of the cations within the spinels.30 Nevertheless, in many cases the energy difference between the different cationic sites is minimum and does not allow for an accurate determination of the position of the cations in the lattice. In addition, the redox versatility exhibited by most of the atoms composing these oxides would require additional characterization to find out which are the oxidation states of each metallic atom in these compounds. The determination of the exact distribution of transition-metal ions in the structures of 9-14 is therefore a difficult task, which remains beyond the scope of this work.

Figure 2. Hydrogen-bonding interactions (dashed bonds) between the 2D oxalate-based framework and the crown ether molecules located in the holes. Hydrogen atoms have been omitted for the sake of simplicity. J. AM. CHEM. SOC.

9

VOL. 132, NO. 15, 2010

5461

ARTICLES

Coronado et al.

Figure 3. Thermal dependence of the χMT product of 1 (blue), 3 (black),

and 4 (orange) measured with an applied field of 1000 G (left) and χMT product of 2 (purple) under an applied field of 1000 G (right). The inset shows the χM Vs T plot in the low-temperature region. Solid lines are only a guide to the eye.

Magnetic Properties. (a) CrIII Series. Magnetic susceptibility

measurements for 1-4 derivatives present almost a constant value for the χMT product value as the temperature decreases down to 20 K (Figure 3). The magnetic susceptibility data can be fitted to a Curie-Weiss law in the high-temperature regime (150-300 K), giving Curie constant values (C) in good agreement with the expected spin-only values (see Table 5 and Figures SI6 and SI7 (Supporting Information)). All compounds present a positive Θ value in the paramagnetic regime, suggesting the presence of ferromagnetic interactions. This fact is in good agreement with the expected superexchange between Cr3+ in an octahedral coordination (S ) 3/2; t2g3 electronic configuration) and the neighboring divalent ions through a bisbidentate chelating oxalate linker. Below 20 K, the χMT product starts to increase and defines a maximum, which corresponds to a steep jump in the χM vs T plot, suggesting the onset of a ferromagnetically ordered state. After this jump, χM tends to saturation in 1, 3, and 4, whereas it defines a maximum in 2. This feature commonly suggests the occurrence of antiferromagnetic interactions and must be attributed to the presence of a low percentage of a contaminant phase. In this context, it is worth noting that the synthesis of this family of layered compounds is rather similar to that employed in the isolation of the related compound {[Mn(OH2)(CH3OH)][Mn(OH2)2]2[Cr(ox)3]2(18-crown-6)} · CH3OH.31 In that particular case, the presence of a fraction of oxalate ligands acting simultaneously as a bidentate-monodentate bridging ligand promoted the presence of an overall antiferromagnetic interaction between Mn2+ and Cr3+ ions. Since the composition of 2 is equivalent to that exhibited by this MnIICrIII oxalate-based ferrimagnet, its magnetic behavior is likely to result from the contribution of the expected ferromagnetic phase with a minor contribution associated to a contaminant ferrimagnetic phase. The isothermal field dependence of the magnetization confirms the ferromagetic nature of these systems (Figure 4). From

Figure 4. Field dependence of the magnetization (left) and zoom-in of the hysteresis loops focusing on the low-field areas (right) of 1 (blue), 2 (purple), 3 (black), and 4 (orange) measured at 2 K.

low fields, the magnetization increases very rapidly, as expected for the overall ferromagnetic coupling, reaching saturation values slightly smaller than those expected for the parallel alignment of the interacting spins. This deviation has been previously observed for other molecule-based magnets and attributed to the presence of spin canting in the ordered ferromagnetic state.8a To confirm the existence of magnetic ordering and define more precisely the critical ordering temperatures, ac magnetic measurements were performed (Figure 5). All the compounds present a maximum in both the in-phase (χ′M) and out-of-phase signals (χ′′M). We have considered the critical temperature (Tc) for these systems as the higher temperature for which the outof-phase signal is nonzero. In this way, critical temperatures range from 7.6 K for 1 down to 3.6 K for 2. Compounds 1, 3, and 4 show sharp, well-defined nonfrequency dependent peaks for both the in-phase and out-of-phase signals. In contrast, 2 shows broader signals and significant dependence of the intensity of the χM′′ signal with the frequency. This anomalous behavior, in comparison with the rest of the derivatives, must be probably attributed to the residual presence of a contaminant phase (vide supra). All compounds present hysteresis loops at 2 K and, in view of their coercive fields, can be classified as soft magnets (Figure 4 and Figure SI9 (Supporting Information)). The highest coercive field of 0.16 kG is observed for 1, probably a result of the presence of highly anisotropic octahedral Co(II) ions. (b) FeIII Series. Magnetic susceptibility measurements for the 5-8 derivatives were performed on powdered samples. All compounds present a decrease in the χMT product values as the systems are cooled. For 5, 6, and 8, χMT clearly defines a minimum at low temperatures that is a typical feature of antiferromagnetic interactions (Figure 6). Susceptibility data in the high-temperature regime (150-300 K) have been fitted to a Curie-Weiss law, yielding Curie constant values (C) in good agreement with the expected spin-only values (Table 5 and

Table 5. Main Magnetic Parameters for 1-8a

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

MIIMIIMIII

χTrt

C

CSO

Θ (K)

TC (K)

MS (µB)

MR (µB)

HCoer (kG)

CoCoCr MnMnCr MnNiCr CoNiCr MnFeFe MnCoFe FeFeFe FeNiFe

11.8 16.4 12.1 8.7 17.5 17.2 14.7 12.6

10.9 16.0 11.9 8.2 19.9 21.7 17.1 15.2

9.38 16.88 11.81 8.06 21.86 18.13 17.75 14.75

22.6 6.6 2.1 44.4 -32.3 -75.6 -52.2 -67.2

7.6 3.6 6.8 6.8 19.5 9.4 12.2 20.0

10.8 17.0 13.9 10.7 4.8 2.3 1.3 2.7

2.3