1999, Volume 33, Pages 2257-2265 Lee A. Newman,* Xiaoping Wang, Indulis A. Muiznieks, Gordon Ekuan, Martin Ruszaj, Remi Cortellucci, David Domroes, George Karscig, Tim Newman, Robert S. Crampton, Ram A. Hashmonay, Michael G. Yost, Paul E. Heilman, James Duffy, Milton P. Gordon, and Stuart E. StrandRemediation of Trichloroethylene in an Artificial Aquifer with Trees: A Controlled Field Study. Page 2261. Figure 2 was incorrect as shown. Here is the correct version. The caption was correct as given.
ES9920213 10.1021/es9920213 Published on Web 09/18/1999 1999, Volume 33, Pages 2833-2834 Eugene J. LeBoeuf: LeBoeuf’s Comment on “Evaluation of the Glassy/Rubbery Model for Soil Organic Matter”. Page 2833, line 61. The word “manner” should be “matter”. Page 2834, line 23. The word “C40” should be “can”. Page 2834, line 35. The word “inhibition” should be replaced with “imbibition”. ES992027S 10.1021/es992027s Published on Web 11/01/1999
VOL. 33, NO. 21, 1999 / ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
9
3935
Environ. Sci. Technol. 1999, 33, 3936
1999, Volume 33, Pages 2837-2838 J. J. Pignatello* and B. Xing: Pignatello and Xing’s Comment on “Evaluation of the Glassy/Rubbery Model for Soil Organic Matter” Page 2837. The first sentence of the last paragraph on the left side should read: “The flaw lies in making a direct correspondence between fractional uptake (e.g., Xt ) 0.67) and fractional equilibrium (i.e., 0.67 of the progress toward equilibrium) along the isotherm”. The phrase in bold replaces the phrase “time it takes to reach”, which could have been misleadingswe did not mean time literally. ES992028K 10.1021/es992028k Published on Web 09/29/1999
1999, Volume 33, Pages 3002-3011. Scott C. Brooks,* Sue L. Carroll, and Philip M. Jardine. Sustained Bacterial Reduction of CoIIIEDTA- in the Presence of Competing Geochemical Oxidation during Dynamic Flow Page 3004. In the section headed Analytical Techniques, filter pore size is specified. The units should be 0.2 µm. Several times in the paper, aqueous Fe concentrations are specified. The units corresponding to those concentrations should be micromolar (µM) not millimolar (mM). ES9920258 10.1021/es9920258 Published on Web 09/11/1999
3936
9
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY / VOL. 33, NO. 21, 1999
10.1021/es992028k CCC: $18.00
1999 American Chemical Society
