Subscriber access provided by ORTA DOGU TEKNIK UNIVERSITESI KUTUPHANESI
Article
Effective As(III) Removal by A Multi-Charged Hydroacid Complex Draw Solute Facilitated Forward Osmosis-Membrane Distillation (FO-MD) Processes Qingchun Ge, Gang Han, and Tai-Shung Chung Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b05402 • Publication Date (Web): 29 Jan 2016 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on February 10, 2016
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
Environmental Science & Technology is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 22
Environmental Science & Technology
1
Effective As(III) Removal by A Multi-Charged
2
Hydroacid Complex Draw Solute Facilitated
3
Forward Osmosis-Membrane Distillation (FO-MD)
4
Processes
5
Qingchun Ge,† Gang Han, ‡ Tai-Shung Chung*,‡§
6
†College of Environment and Resources, Fuzhou University, Fujian 350116, China.
7
‡Department of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, National University of Singapore,
8
4 Engineering Drive 4, Singapore 117576, Singapore
9
§Water Desalination & Reuse (WDR) Center King Abdullah University of Science and
10
Technology, Saudi Arabia 23955-6900
11
Correspondence to: T. S. Chung (E-mail:
[email protected])
12
Tel: (65) 6516-6645; Fax: 65-6779-1936
13
ABSTRACT: Effective removal of As(III) from water by an oxalic acid complex with the
14
formula of Na3[Cr(C2O4)3] (Na-Cr-OA) is demonstrated via an forward osmosis-membrane
15
distillation (FO-MD) hybrid system in this study. Na-Cr-OA firstly proved its superiority as a
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
1
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 2 of 22
16
draw solute with high water fluxes and negligible reverse fluxes in FO, then a systematic
17
investigation of the Na-Cr-OA promoted FO process was conducted to ascertain the factors in
18
As(III) removal. Relatively high water fluxes of 28 LMH under the FO mode and 74 LMH under
19
the pressure retarded osmosis (PRO) mode were achieved when using a 1000 ppm As(III)
20
solution as the feed and 1.0 M Na-Cr-OA as the draw solution at 60 °C. As(III) removal with a
21
water recovery up to 21.6% (FO mode) and 48.3% (PRO mode) were also achieved in 2 hours.
22
An outstanding As(III) rejection with 30 ∼ 3000 µg/L As(III) in the permeate was accomplished
23
when As(III) feed solutions varied from 5x104 to 1x106 µg/L, superior to the best FO
24
performance reported for As(III) removal. Incorporating MD into FO not only makes As(III)
25
removal sustainable by re-concentrating the Na-Cr-OA solution simultaneously, but also reduces
26
the As(III) concentration below 10 µg/L in the product water, meeting the WHO standard.
27
■ TOC Art
28 29
■ INTRODUCTION
30
Arsenic contamination in groundwater is a serious problem due to its high toxicity and
31
ubiquitous presence.1 It mainly exists in inorganic forms with oxidation states of As(III) and
32
As(V) in different proportions. The toxicity and mobility of arsenite species (As(III)) are higher
33
than those of their arsenate (As(V)) analogues.2 According to the drinking water guideline set by
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
2
Page 3 of 22
Environmental Science & Technology
34
World Health Organization (WHO), the maximum arsenic concentration in drinking water is 10
35
µg L-1.3 Arsenic poisoning is one of major environmental problems in the world with millions of
36
people being exposed to arsenic-contaminated drinking water.4 Hence, arsenic removal from
37
contaminated water is an important issue that needs to be solved urgently.
38
Many technologies including coagulation, adsorption, ion exchange and bacterial treatment
39
have been employed for arsenic removal from water.1 Most of them require secondary treatments
40
to further reduce arsenic concentration in order to meet the WHO standard. Additionally, a large
41
amount of chemicals is involved and a high volume of sludge is produced. In some processes,
42
arsenic leaches out from the sludge. Thus, the maintenance of these conventional technologies is
43
usually costly. In contrast, membrane technology shows unique advantages of little chemical
44
involvement, small sludge and relatively low maintenance cost when removing arsenic from
45
water.5 Hence, membrane processes such as microfiltration (MF), ultrafiltration (UF),
46
nanofiltration (NF) and reverse osmosis (RO) have been extensively used in arsenic-containing
47
water purification.5,6 Among them, NF and RO have manifested their effectiveness in removing
48
arsenic from water.7-9 However, both processes are operated at high pressures and have relatively
49
low water recovery rates. Therefore, comparatively high costs are required and they suffer the
50
risk of severe membrane fouling.10
51
Recently, forward osmosis (FO) has been applied to arsenic removal from water.11-13 FO is
52
more promising than other membrane processes due to its low pressure operation, high water
53
recovery and low membrane fouling.14-17 As FO membrane and draw solute are the two
54
determining factors in FO technology, a powerful draw solute with a minimal reverse flux favors
55
the improvement of FO performance. NaCl,11 MgCl2 and glucose12 were the draw solutes in the
56
previous studies of arsenic removal. These conventional draw solutes, however, were not
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
3
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 4 of 22
57
efficient in feed water recovery for arsenic removal due to low water permeate fluxes and/or
58
relatively high reverse solute fluxes. Hydroacid complexes have proven their superiority as draw
59
solutes in FO processes.18,19 The oxalic acid-Cr complex with a molecular formula of
60
Na3[Cr(C2O4)3] (Na-Cr-OA) possessing a Cr-centered octahedral structure and multi-charged
61
feature (Figure S1) demonstrated its suitability as a draw solute in FO with a very high water
62
flux and a negligible reverse solute flux.19 Besides the advantages of having high water
63
solubility, multi-charges and negligible reverse flux, Na-Cr-OA has good thermal stability and
64
only decomposes when temperature is up to 240 °C. It has lower viscosity compared to other
65
hydroacid complexes.19 Na-Cr-OA was therefore used as the draw solute in this FO study for the
66
arsenic removal.
67
Since the current arsenic removal technologies are less effective to remove As(III) than As(V),
68
pre-oxidation of As(III) to As(V) is an indispensable step in most treatment technologies for
69
better removal.5 To mitigate the oxidation step and to achieve an efficient and effective removal
70
of As(III) from water, a Na-Cr-OA facilitated forward osmosis-membrane distillation (FO-MD)
71
hybrid system was applied to the As(III) removal. FO-MD has been proven workable as an
72
integrated membrane process.20-22 To our best knowledge, the hybrid FO-MD system has not yet
73
been employed in As(III) removal from water. The hybrid FO-MD system was chosen because
74
(1) the Na-Cr-OA draw solution would perform better at temperatures higher than ambient
75
conditions with a lower viscosity, (2) the permeate from MD could meet the stringent WHO
76
standard on As(III) of less than 10 µg/L and (3) we aim to develop a sustainable hybrid FO-MD
77
system for As(III) removal.
78
Therefore, the objectives of this study are (1) to systematically study the effects of
79
experimental factors including membrane orientation, temperature, co-existing solutes, pH and
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
4
Page 5 of 22
Environmental Science & Technology
80
As(III) feed concentration on As(III) removal in FO processes and (2) to investigate the MD
81
process and to identify the most suitable conditions for a sustainable FO-MD process. This study
82
may provide inspiration for future studies in novel draw solutes and hybrid systems to effectively
83
and sustainably remove As(III) from water.
84
■ MATERIALS AND METHODS
85
Synthesis of the Na-Cr-OA Draw Solute. Na-Cr-OA was synthesized through a modified
86
method19 from Na2C2O4, H2C2O4 and Na2Cr2O7⋅2H2O. The detailed experimental procedures are
87
disclosed in the supporting information (SI).
88
As(III) Solution Preparation and Analyses. The As(III) feed solutions were prepared from
89
As2O3 with the aid of NaOH or HCl solutions. The details of the As(III) solution preparation and
90
analyses are included in the SI.
91
Individual FO, MD and hybrid FO-MD processes. The FO-MD experiments were
92
conducted via a bench-scale hybrid FO-MD system as depicted elsewhere.20,21 The system was
93
also used for individual FO and MD experiments. Lab-made thin-film composite FO membranes
94
fabricated on polyethersulfone hollow fiber substrates (TFC-PES)23 and PVDF MD hollow fiber
95
membranes21 with characteristics shown in Table S1 were employed as FO and MD membranes,
96
respectively. The detailed experimental conditions are described in the SI.
97
■ RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
98
Effects of Temperature on Relative Viscosity of Na-Cr-OA solutions. As the viscosity of a
99
draw solution has notable effects on its FO performance,24 the impact of temperature on relative
100
viscosity of the Na-Cr-OA solution is studied prior to investigating its FO performance (Figure
101
S2). Since NaCl has been extensively used as the draw solute in FO, it is served as a benchmark
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
5
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 6 of 22
102
for performance comparison with the Na-Cr-OA draw solute in this study. Its relative viscosity at
103
different temperatures is also presented in Figure S2.
104
The relative viscosity of the Na-Cr-OA solution declines with increasing temperature. The
105
decrement is greater at a higher temperature. In contrast, the NaCl solution has insignificant
106
changes in its relative viscosity with temperature. In view of the inverse relationship between
107
viscosity and water flux in FO, a higher water flux is expected for the Na-Cr-OA solution at a
108
higher temperature. However, the increment in water flux with temperature may not be so
109
significant when using NaCl as the draw solute. This will be verified by the results of FO
110
experiments and discussed in the subsequent sections.
111
FO processes via TFC-PES hollow fiber membranes. As membrane orientation and
112
operation temperature have remarkable effects on FO performance, FO processes under different
113
conditions were evaluated prior to studying the As(III) removal. Figure 1 summarizes their
114
effects on water flux and reverse solute flux as a function of time using TFC-PES hollow fiber
115
membranes. (a)
(b)
116
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
6
Page 7 of 22
Environmental Science & Technology
(c)
(d)
117 118
Figure 1. Effects of temperature and membrane orientation on FO performance using TFC-PES
119
hollow fiber membranes: (a) water flux of Na-Cr-OA, (b) water flux of NaCl, (c) reverse salt
120
flux of Na-Cr-OA, and (d) reverse salt flux of NaCl. Initial conditions: 1.0 M Na-Cr-OA and
121
NaCl as the draw solutions, DI water as the feed solution.
122
Both Na-Cr-OA and NaCl draw solutions exhibit higher water fluxes at higher temperatures
123
because the hydration sphere of the hydrated solute molecules changes with temperature. A
124
higher temperature conduces to a smaller hydration radius of the solute molecules which results
125
in lower viscosity, as confirmed by Figure S2. In addition, a higher temperature elevates their
126
osmotic pressures according to the van’t Hoff equation ( π = iMRT, where T is the
127
thermodynamic temperature).25 Both changes lead to an enhancement in FO water fluxes. The
128
decreasing trend in water flux as a function of time is possibly caused by the dilution of draw
129
solutions and the effects of concentration polarization.20-24 Nevertheless, an average water flux of
130
around 56 ∼ 76 LMH and 19 ∼ 29 LMH at 25 ∼ 60 °C were acquired for Na-Cr-OA in the 2-h
131
duration test under the pressure retarded osmosis (PRO) and FO modes, respectively. The water
132
fluxes under the PRO mode consistently surpass those under the FO mode in all experiments
133
because the former has less internal concentration polarization (ICP) than the latter.24,26-28 Na-Cr-
134
OA outperforms NaCl in terms of water flux under the PRO mode, especially at a higher
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
7
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 8 of 22
135
temperature because the former has more disassociated ionic species than the latter at the same
136
molar concentration. In contrast, the water flux difference between Na-Cr-OA and NaCl under
137
the FO mode is not as big as that under the PRO mode. This is due to the fact that Na-Cr-OA has
138
a larger structure which possibly causes a lower diffusion coefficient and hence severer ICP than
139
NaCl. Nevertheless, Na-Cr-OA still outperforms NaCl in terms of water flux especially at higher
140
temperatures.
141
The reverse salt fluxes of both Na-Cr-OA and NaCl as a function of temperature exhibit the
142
same trends as their water fluxes (Figures 1(c) and 1(d)). The Na-Cr-OA draw solute has an
143
insignificant reverse salt flux of less than 0.7 gMH for all experiments. In contrast, NaCl has a
144
much higher reverse salt flux (Figure 1(d)). Moreover, its reverse solute flux increases
145
significantly with an increase in temperature. Hence, Na-Cr-OA shows its superiority to NaCl in
146
terms of higher water flux and insignificant reverse solute flux in the studied temperature range.
147
The specific flux, defined as Js/Jv (g L-1), is smaller than 0.01 g L-1 for Na-Cr-OA, indicating a
148
negligible loss of Na-Cr-OA in the FO process. The negligible reverse flux is primarily attributed
149
to the two factors: 1) Donnan exclusion effect. Na-Cr-OA can ionize and form a trivalent
150
oxyanion of [Cr(C2O4)3]3- in solutions which is repulsive with the negatively-charged TFC-PES
151
membrane. Thus, it lowers the Na-Cr-OA diffusion across the membrane to the feed side; 2) size
152
exclusion effect. Unlike NaCl, the Na-Cr-OA molecule has a Cr-centered octahedral structure, as
153
proven by its single crystal chromatography.19 In addition, its carboxylic groups can form
154
abundant H-bonds with the surrounding water molecules. Furthermore, its sodium ions can
155
interact with the oxygen atoms of water molecules and grow the Na-Cr-OA complex to a
156
polymeric network in the aqueous solution. Figure S3(a) displays the proposed polymeric
157
network of Na-Cr-OA in the aqueous solution, while Figure S3(b) shows its solid-state
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
8
Page 9 of 22
Environmental Science & Technology
158
polymeric structure generated from the cif file in reference 19 using the software of “the Bruker
159
SHELXTL Software Package”. Therefore, both the inherent structure of Na-Cr-OA and its
160
polymeric network in solutions account for the negligible reverse fluxes.
161
As(III) removal through FO processes. Figure 2 shows the As(III) removal and water
162
recovery as functions of temperature and operational mode by using 1000 ppm As(III) as the
163
feed solution and 1.0 M Na-Cr-OA as the draw solution. The water flux declines slightly but
164
varies with temperature similar to the trend when using DI water as the feed (Figure 1). The
165
slight decline in water flux is ascribed to the effect of simultaneous concentration change with an
166
increase in the As(III) feed solution and a decrease in the Na-Cr-OA draw solution when water
167
transports from the feed side to the draw solution. As a result, the effective driving force across
168
the membrane decreases and results in a decline in water flux. However, relatively high water
169
fluxes of 17 ∼ 28 LMH (FO mode) and 54 ∼ 74 LMH (PRO mode) were still achieved at 25 ∼ 60
170
°C. Encouragingly, the As(III) solutions are rapidly concentrated to 1276 ppm and 1935 ppm
171
with water recovery up to 21.6 % and 48.3 % within 2 hours at 60 °C under FO and PRO modes,
172
respectively, as illustrated in Figure 2(b). These performances are superior to the best FO
173
performance reported for As(III) removal.29 In addition, comparatively high As(III) rejections
174
were achieved under neutral conditions. As displayed in Figures 2(c) and 2(d), the rejections of
175
As(III) were almost constant during the 2-h experiments with values higher than 80% under both
176
PRO and FO modes. Interestingly, the FO mode has a better rejection of above 90% than the
177
PRO mode. In addition, a higher rejection is obtained at room temperature. These rejection
178
values are much higher than those reported in the literature for As(III) removal via FO processes
179
under neutral conditions.8,29
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
9
Environmental Science & Technology
(a)
Page 10 of 22
(b)
180 (c)
(d)
181 182
Figure 2. Effects of temperature and membrane orientation on FO performance in As(III)
183
removal: (a) water fluxes under both PRO and FO modes, (b) water recovery of the feed solution
184
and As(III) feed concentration after 2-h FO processes, (c) rejection of As(III) under the PRO
185
mode, and (d) rejection of As(III) under the FO mode. Initial conditions: 1.0 M Na-Cr-OA as the
186
draw solution, 1000 ppm As(III) as the feed solution.
187
The FO performance as a function of As(III) concentration and temperatures was also studied.
188
As illustrated in Figure 3, water flux is more sensitive to temperature variation than to the
189
change of As(III) concentration. A slight change in water flux is observed with an increase in
190
As(III) concentration at a certain temperature, especially at a higher temperature. In contrast, the
191
feed As(III) concentration has noticeable impact on rejection. A lower As(III) concentration led
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
10
Page 11 of 22
Environmental Science & Technology
192
to a higher As(III) rejection in the studied temperature range. As a result, the As(III)
193
concentration in the final draw solution after FO is in the range of 0.03 ∼ 3 ppm when the As(III)
194
feed concentration varies from 50 to 1000 ppm under neutral conditions. Even though the
195
rejection becomes lower at higher feed concentrations, the As(III) concentration in the final draw
196
solution is still much lower than the best value reported for As(III) removal from water via a
197
single method/process.30,31 Hence, FO is a facile and reliable technology that can remove the vast
198
majority of As(III) efficiently. (a)
(b)
199 200
Figure 3. Effects of As (III) concentration and temperature on FO performance in As (III)
201
removal: (a) water flux, and (b) As (III) rejection. Experimental conditions: 1.0 M Na-Cr-OA as
202
the draw solution, FO mode. Test duration: 30 min. Error bars were obtained by repeated
203
analyses (n = 6).
204
pH effect on As(III) removal. The pH effect on As(III) removal through the FO process was
205
further explored in this study. As(III) solutions with pH varying in the range of 3 ∼ 11 were
206
evaluated because the dominant species would gradually change from the neutral H3AsO3 to the
207
charged H2AsO3- under such conditions. Figure 4 displays the effects of pH on both water flux
208
and As(III) rejection.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
11
Environmental Science & Technology
(a)
Page 12 of 22
(b)
209 210
Figure 4. Effects of pH on FO performance in As(III) removal: (a) water flux and As(III)
211
rejection under the PRO mode, (b) water flux and As(III) rejection under the FO mode. Initial
212
conditions: 1.0 M Na-Cr-OA as the draw solution, 1000 ppm As(III) as the feed solution. Test
213
duration: 30 min, room temperature.
214
Regardless of membrane orientation, water flux decreases slightly when the pH increases from
215
weakly acidic to weakly alkaline (pH 3 ∼ 9). An obvious decline in water flux is observed when
216
the As(III) feed solution becomes very basic (pH ∼ 11) because the amount of neutral species
217
(H3AsO3) decreases whilst that of charged species (H2AsO3-) increases in the feed solution. The
218
higher the pH value, the higher the amount of charged species is present. Meanwhile, the more
219
the charged species in the feed solution, the greater the osmotic pressure is. As a consequence,
220
the osmotic pressure difference between the draw solution and feed solution decreases with an
221
increase in feed pH value. Accordingly, the net driving force across the FO membrane declines
222
and results in a reduced water flux. It should be noted that no obvious pH change was observed
223
in the Na-Cr-OA draw solutions with the pH variation in the As(III) feed solution under the
224
entire studied conditions. This may be due to the high As(III) rejection, as depicted in Figure 4,
225
which cause no effect on the pH of the Na-Cr-OA draw solutions.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
12
Page 13 of 22
Environmental Science & Technology
226
The changes of As(III) rejection with pH under both PRO and FO modes show a similar trend.
227
The As(III) rejection undergoes a slight increase from pH 3 to 9 but increases substantially at pH
228
11 because the fraction of H2AsO3- at this pH may reach as high as about 91% according to the
229
study conducted by Tanaka et al..4 As H2AsO3- has a larger hydrated size than H3AsO3 due to
230
more interactions with surrounding water molecules for the former than the latter,4 size exclusion
231
is more prominent for H2AsO3- removal at a higher pH. Meanwhile, separation due to Donnan
232
exclusion also becomes more significant because of the repulsion between the negatively-
233
charged TFC-PES FO membrane and H2AsO3-. Consequently, the combined effects of size
234
exclusion and Donnan exclusion enable the rejection to reach the highest at pH = 11. In addition,
235
the difference in As(III) rejection between PRO and FO modes becomes smaller with an increase
236
in pH value. They are almost the same at pH = 11. In brief, pH plays an important role in
237
determining both water flux and As(III) rejection due to the state variation of the feed As(III)
238
species under different pH values. It can decrease the water flux but significantly increase the
239
As(III) rejection in very alkaline conditions.
240
Effect of co-existing solutes on As(III) removal. The influences of co-solutes on FO
241
performance in terms of As(III) rejection and water flux are represented in Figure 5. The cations
242
(Na+ and Mg2+) in the presence of a common counter-ion (Cl-) and the anions (Cl- and SO42-)
243
paired with a counter-ion (Na+) were added to the As(III) aqueous solutions in separate
244
experiments. As shown in Figure 5(a), the existence of cations results in a declined water flux.
245
The flux decline is greater in the presence of divalent Mg2+ than monovalent Na+. This is
246
possibly because of the interaction between the cations and the negatively-charged FO
247
membrane, resulting in membrane fouling and hence a drop in water flux. An increase in cation
248
concentration may also contribute to the decrease in water flux. Unlike the variation trends in
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
13
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 14 of 22
249
water fluxes, the changes in the As(III) rejection are insignificant upon the addition of cations.
250
This may be attributed to the presence of the dominant species of H3AsO3 in solution under the
251
studied conditions; hence the charge changes in the membrane surface have little effect on the
252
passage of the neutral substance.
253
Compared to Figure 5(a), the influence of anions (Cl- and SO42-) on water flux and As(III)
254
rejection is insignificant in the presence of either monovalent Cl- or divalent SO42- (Figure 5(b)).
255
This is understandable because despite the existence of electrostatic repulsion between the anions
256
and the negatively-charged FO membrane, the neutral status of H3AsO3 and membrane
257
properties remain the same. Therefore, the influence of these anions on FO performance is
258
negligible. The slight change in water flux may result from the osmotic pressure change of the
259
feed solution due to the addition of anions.
260
(a)
(b)
261 262
Figure 5. Effects of co-solutes on FO performance in As(III) removal: (a) cation effect on water
263
flux and As(III) rejection, (b) anion effect on water flux and As(III) rejection. Initial conditions:
264
1.0 M Na-Cr-OA as the draw solution, 1000 ppm As(III) as the feed solution, under the FO mode
265
and neutral conditions. Test duration: 30 min, room temperature.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
14
Page 15 of 22
Environmental Science & Technology
266
Hybrid FO-MD process. Prior to combining MD with FO to re-concentrate the diluted Na-
267
Cr-OA solution from FO, the MD process was investigated to ascertain how the effects of
268
temperature and Na-Cr-OA concentration on water flux and water transfer rate. (a)
(b)
269 270
Figure 6. Effects of temperature and Na-Cr-OA concentration on: (a) water flux, and (b) water
271
transfer rate. Initial conditions: MD processes, DI water at 20 °C in the permeate side, Test
272
duration: 30 min.
273
The experiments studying the effects of temperature change on water flux were carried out using
274
Na-Cr-OA solutions at different concentrations flowing against the shell side of the MD module
275
at 40 °C, 50 °C and 60 °C, respectively. Meanwhile, DI water at 20 °C was circulating in the
276
permeate side of the MD module under all conditions. A 30-min test duration was used in the
277
individual MD processes. As illustrated in Figure 6, temperature shows the dominant effect on
278
water flux in the MD process since it is a thermal driven process. When increasing temperature,
279
an accelerated increment in water flux is observed as the water vapor pressure follows an
280
exponential function of temperature.32 In contrast, water flux changes insignificantly with Na-Cr-
281
OA concentration. Since water transfer rate is a product of water flux and membrane surface
282
area, a MD module packed with 10 pieces of PVDF hollow fibers with 15 cm in length has the
283
similar water transfer rate as the FO process under the FO mode in the first 30-min run at 60 °C.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
15
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 16 of 22
284
Therefore, the hybrid FO-MD experiments were conducted at 60 °C using a 1000 ppm As(III)
285
feed solution and a 1.0 M Na-Cr-OA draw solution circulating in the lumen and shell sides of the
286
FO membrane module, respectively, while the diluted Na-Cr-OA solution from the FO side and
287
DI water at 20 °C were circulated in the shell and lumen sides of the MD membrane module,
288
respectively.
289
The hybrid FO-MD system is more efficient than the individual FO process in the
290
concentration of the As(III) feed solution since Na-Cr-OA solution was concentrated
291
instantaneously by the MD process once it was diluted in FO. As depicted in Figure 7, a more
292
concentrated As(III) feed solution is obtained and a higher recovery rate is achieved due to a
293
steady water flux in the hybrid FO-MD process compared to the single FO process. It is
294
encouraging to observe that the As(III) concentration in the MD permeate is lower than 0.01ppm
295
(10 µg/L), satisfying the standard set by WHO. In addition, no variation in conductivity is
296
detected at the permeate side of MD under all experimental conditions, indicative of an almost
297
complete rejection of Na-Cr-OA in the MD process. In conclusion, the Na-Cr-OA facilitated FO-
298
MD system shows its efficiency and effectiveness in the As(III) removal from water,
299
demonstrating its practicability in As(III) removal under neutral conditions. The newly
300
developed system does not need the oxidation pretreatment step by converting As(III) to As(V),
301
which is essential for conventional technologies.29,33 This study may provide useful insights for
302
novel draw solute exploration and inspire future studies for effective As(III) removal from water.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
16
Page 17 of 22
Environmental Science & Technology
(a)
(b)
303 304
Figure 7. Performance comparison between single FO and hybrid FO-MD processes: (a) As (III)
305
feed concentration with time, (b) As (III) feed recovery with time. Initial conditions: 1.0 M Na-
306
Cr-OA as the draw solution and 1000 ppm As(III) as the feed solution in the FO process, FO
307
mode in the FO process, 60 °C.
308
■ AUTHOR INFORMATION
309
Corresponding Author
310
E-mail:
[email protected]; Tel: (65) 6516-6645; Fax: 65-6779-1936
311
■ ACKNOWLEDGMENT
312
This research is supported by both the National Research Foundation- Prime Minister's office,
313
Republic of Singapore under its Competitive Research Program entitled “Advanced FO
314
Membranes and Membrane Systems for Wastewater Treatment, Water Reuse and Seawater
315
Desalination” (Grant numbers: R-279-000-336-281 & R-279-000-339-281), and Fuzhou
316
University (Grant numbers: 510160 & 521142). Special thanks are given to Ms. Jie Gao, Mr.
317
Zhenlei Cheng and Mr. Zhiwei Thong for their valuable help.
318
■ ASSOCIATED CONTENT
319
Supporting Information Available
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
17
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 18 of 22
320
Materials; synthesis of the Na-Cr-OA draw solute; relative viscosity of Na-Cr-OA and NaCl
321
draw solutions; As(III) solution preparation and analyses; individual FO, MD and hybrid FO-
322
MD processes; structures of Na-Cr-OA in both solution and solid state; the properties of the FO
323
and MD hollow fiber membranes.
324 325
■ REFERENCES
326
(1) Choong, T. S. Y.; Chuah, T. G.; Robiah, Y.; Koay, F. L. G.; Azni, I. Arsenic toxicity,
327
health hazards and removal techniques from water: an overview. Desalination 2007, 217, 139–
328
166.
329
(2) Mascher, R.; Lippmann, B.; Holzinger, S.; Bergmann, H. Arsenate toxicity: effects on
330
oxidative stress response molecules and enzymes in red clover plants. Plant Sci. 2002, 163, 961–
331
969.
332
(3) World Health Organisation (WHO), Guidelines for Drinking Water Quality, 1993, p. 41.
333
(4) Tanaka, M.; Takahashi, Y.; Yamaguchi, N.; Kim, K.-W.; Zheng, G.; Sakamitsu, M. The
334
difference of diffusion coefficients in water for arsenic compounds at various pH and its
335
dominant factors implied by molecular simulations. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2013, 105, 360–
336
371.
337
(5) Uddin, M. T.; Mozumder, M. S. I.; Figobli, A.; Islam, M. A.; Drioli, E. Arsenic removal by
338
conventional and membrane technology: An overview. Indian J. Chem. Technol. 2007, 14, 441–
339
450.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
18
Page 19 of 22
Environmental Science & Technology
340
(6) Brandhube, P.; Amy, G. Arsenic removal by a charged ultrafiltration membrane influences
341
of membrane operating conditions and water quality on arsenic rejection. Desalination 2001,
342
140, 1−14.
343 344
(7) Sato, Y.; Kang, M.; Kamei, T.; Magara, Y. Performance of nanofiltration for arsenic removal. Water Res. 2002, 36, 3371–3377.
345
(8) Zhu, W. P.; Gao, J.; Sun, S. P.; Zhang, S.; Chung, T. S. Poly(amidoamine) dendrimer
346
(PAMAM) grafted on thin film composite (TFC) nanofiltration (NF) hollow fiber membranes for
347
heavy metal removal. J. Membr. Sci. 2015, 487, 117–126.
348 349 350 351
(9) Xu, P.; Capito, M.; Cath, T. Y. Selective removal of arsenic and monovalent ions from brackish water reverse osmosis concentrate. J. Hazard.Mater. 2013, 260, 885– 891. (10) Qin, J. J.; Liberman, B.; Kekre, K. A. Direct osmosis for reverse osmosis fouling control: principles, applications and recent developments. Open Chem. Eng. J. 2009, 3, 8–16.
352
(11) Jin, X.; She, Q.; Ang, X.; Tang, C. Y. Removal of boron and arsenic by forward osmosis
353
membrane: influence of membrane orientation and organic fouling. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 389,
354
182–187.
355
(12) Mondal, P.; Tran, A. T. K.; der Bruggen, B. V. Removal of As (V) from simulated
356
groundwater using forward osmosis: Effect of competing and coexisting solutes. Desalination
357
2014, 348, 33–38.
358 359
(13) Cui, Y.; Ge, Q.; Liu, X. Y.; Chung, T. S. Novel forward osmosis process to effectively remove heavy metal ions. J. Membr. Sci. 2014, 467, 188–194.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
19
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 20 of 22
360
(14) Chung, T. S.; Li, X.; Ong, R. C.; Ge, Q.; Wang, H. L.; Han, G. Emerging forward osmosis
361
(FO) technologies and challenges ahead for clean water and clean energy applications. Curr.
362
Opin. Chem. Eng. 2012, 1, 246–257.
363 364
(15) Cath, T. Y.; Childress, A. E.; Elimelech, M. Forward osmosis: principles, applications, and recent developments. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 281, 70–87.
365
(16) Li, Z.Y.; Yangali-Quintanilla, V.; Valladares-Linares, R.; Li, Q.; Zhan, T.; Amy, G. Flux
366
patterns and membrane fouling propensity during desalination of seawater by forward osmosis.
367
Water Res. 2012, 46, 195–204.
368 369 370 371 372 373
(17) Mi, B. X.; Elimelech, M. Organic fouling of forward osmosis membranes: Fouling reversibility and cleaning without chemical reagents. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 348, 337–345. (18) Ge, Q.; Fu, F. J.; Chung, T. S. Ferric and cobaltous hydroacid complexes for forward osmosis (FO) processes. Water Res. 2014, 58, 230–238. (19) Ge, Q.; Chung, T. S. Oxalic acid complexes: promising draw solutes for forward osmosis (FO) in protein enrichment. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 4854–4857.
374
(20) Su, J.; Ong, R. C.; Wang, P.; Chung, T. S. Advanced FO membranes from newly
375
synthesized CAP polymer for wastewater reclamation through an integrated FO-MD hybrid
376
system. AIChE J. 2013, 59, 1245–1254.
377
(21) Ge, Q.; Wang, P.; Wan, C.; Chung, T. S.; Amy, G. Polyelectrolyte-promoted forward
378
osmosis-membrane distillation (FO-MD) hybrid process for dye wastewater treatment. Environ.
379
Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 6236–6243.
380
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
20
Page 21 of 22
381 382
Environmental Science & Technology
(22) der Bruggen, B. V.; Luis, P. Forward osmosis: understanding the hype. Rev. Chem. Eng. 2015, 31, 1–12.
383
(23) Sukitpaneenit, P.; Chung, T. S. High performance thin-film composite forward osmosis
384
hollow fiber membranes with macrovoid-free and highly porous structure for sustainable water
385
production. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 7358−7365.
386 387
(24) Ge, Q.; Su, J.; Amy, G. L.; Chung, T. S. Exploration of polyelectrolytes as draw solutes in forward osmosis processes. Water Res. 2012, 46, 1318−1326.
388
(25) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osmotic_pressure.
389
(26) McCutcheon, J. R.; Elimelech, M. Influence of concentrative and dilutive internal
390
concentration polarization on flux behavior in forward osmosis. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 284, 237–
391
247.
392 393
(27) Zhao, S.; Zou, L.; Tang, C. Y.; Mulcahy, D. Recent developments in forward osmosis: opportunities and challenges. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 396, 1–21.
394
(28) Yang, Q.; Wang, K. Y.; Chung, T. S. Dual-layer hollow fibers with enhanced flux as
395
novel forward osmosis membranes for water reclamation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 2800–
396
2805.
397
(29) Mondal, P.; Hermans, N.; Tran, A. T. K.; Zhang, Y.; Fang, Y.; Wang, X.; der Bruggen, B.
398
V. Effect of physico-chemical parameters on inorganic arsenic removal from aqueous solution
399
using a forward osmosis membrane. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2014, 2, 1309–1316.
400 401
(30) Ng, K. S.; Ujang, Z.; Le-Clech, P. Arsenic Removal Technologies for Drinking Water Treatment. Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 2004, 3, 43−53.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
21
Environmental Science & Technology
402 403
Page 22 of 22
(31) Baig, S. A.; Sheng, T.; Hu, Y.; Xu, J.; Xu, X. Arsenic removal from natural water using low cost granulated adsorbents: a review. CLEAN–Soil, Air, Water 2015, 43, 13−26.
404
(32) Bonyadi, S.; Chung, T. S.; Rajagopalan, R. A novel approach to fabricate macrovoid-free
405
and highly permeable PVDF hollow fiber membranes for membrane distillation. AIChE J. 2009,
406
55, 828–833.
407
(33) Lee, S. H.; Kim, K. W.; Choi, H.; Takahashi, Y. Simultaneous photooxidation and
408
sorptive removal of As(III) by TiO2 supported layered double hydroxide. J. Environ. Manage.
409
2015, 161, 228−236.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
22