Roll-to-Roll Nanomanufacturing of Hybrid Nanostructures for Energy

Jun 8, 2015 - A key limitation to the practical incorporation of nanostructured materials into emerging applications is the challenge of achieving low...
0 downloads 9 Views 7MB Size
Download PDF
Research Article www.acsami.org

Roll-to-Roll Nanomanufacturing of Hybrid Nanostructures for Energy Storage Device Design Landon Oakes,†,‡ Trevor Hanken,‡ Rachel Carter,‡ William Yates,‡ and Cary L. Pint*,†,‡ †

Interdisciplinary Materials Science and Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37212, United States Mechanical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37212, United States

‡

S Supporting Information *

ABSTRACT: A key limitation to the practical incorporation of nanostructured materials into emerging applications is the challenge of achieving low-cost, high throughput, and highly replicable scalable nanomanufacturing techniques to produce functional materials. Here, we report a benchtop roll-to-roll technique that builds upon the use of binary solutions of nanomaterials and liquid electrophoretic assembly to rapidly construct hybrid materials for battery design applications. We demonstrate surfactant-free hybrid mixtures of carbon nanotubes, silicon nanoparticles, MoS2 nanosheets, carbon nanohorns, and graphene nanoplatelets. Roll-to-roll electrophoretic assembly from these solutions enables the controlled fabrication of homogeneous coatings of these nanostructures that maintain chemical and physical properties defined by the synergistic combination of nanomaterials utilized without adverse effects of surfactants or impurities that typically limit liquid nanomanufacturing routes. To demonstrate the utility of this nanomanufacturing approach, we employed roll-to-roll electrophoretic processing to fabricate both positive and negative electrodes for lithium ion batteries in less than 30 s. The optimized full-cell battery, containing active materials of prelithiated silicon nanoparticles and MoS2 nanosheets, was assessed to exhibit energy densities of 167 Wh/kgcell−1 and power densities of 9.6 kW/kgcell−1. KEYWORDS: roll-to-roll, nanomanufacturing, electrophoretic deposition, hybrid nanomaterials, silicon nanoparticles, MoS2, carbon nanotubes, carbon nanohorns, graphene, lithium ion battery

■

conversion,9,10 sensing,11 and optical devices,12 among others. EPD enables the formation of pinhole-free films conformally layered on arbitrary materials with characteristics such as controllable thickness, macroscopic uniformity, rapid formation rates, and uniquely high packing efficiencies.13−16 Recent advances in the understanding of EPD processes have driven interest toward industry scale manufacturing of nanomaterials.17−20 This is compounded by research efforts in recent years to couple 1D and 2D materials with EPD, such as graphene, carbon nanotubes, and nanoparticles21−23 in addition to hybrids of these materials.24−27 However, most techniques demonstrating EPD of these materials require the use of additives or surfactants, which leads to the retention of these impurities in the deposited material that inhibits physical and chemical performance. Recently, substantial progress has been made in solubilizing low-dimensional nanostructures in surfactant-free solutions through the use of highly polar solvents or superacids.28−30 In this regard, 1-methyl-2pyrrolidone (NMP) has demonstrated growing popularity for solution processing of individual carbon nanostructures as well as other 2-D materials31−33 due to its exceptionally high surface

INTRODUCTION Scalable manufacturing of nanomaterials is challenged by factors typically benign to conventional manufacturing routes for bulk materials.1−3 Whereas nanostructures are consistently lauded for improved performance in applications at the laboratory scale, fabrication processes and costs for industrial processing often limit near-term commercial impact of many nanomaterial-based applications. Additionally, unlike bulk materials, the physical and chemical properties of materials composed of nanostructures are strongly correlated to impurities that interact with the nanostructures and the transport paths between adjacent nanoscale building blocks in the material. This provides two extremes for nanomaterial fabrication: (i) highly precise, expensive fabrication routes carried out in clean environments (e.g., ultraviolet or electronbased lithographic techniques), or (ii) large-scale, low-cost “coarse” material processing that relies on the use of liquid processing with surfactants (e.g., colloidal processing such as blade coating and/or electrophoretic deposition (EPD)).4−6 Our efforts aim to explore the medium existing between these two processing routes where scalability and control or precision can be simultaneously achieved.7,8 In recent years, EPD has specifically been demonstrated as a versatile tool in the laboratory-scale fabrication of nanomaterials for broad applications, spanning energy storage and © XXXX American Chemical Society

Received: February 10, 2015 Accepted: June 8, 2015

A

DOI: 10.1021/acsami.5b01315 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX

Research Article

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces tension (γ > 40 mJ/m2) and highly polar nature. The properties of this solution make it amenable to both solubilization of SWCNTs and exfoliation of transition metal dichalcogenides (TMD) enabling one-batch processing of SWCNTs and exfoliated hybrid materials. Our recent work has demonstrated EPD of nanostructures from these polar solvent dispersions, enabling clean and pristine nanostructure deposition on a variety of substrates.15,34,35 EPD has specifically been demonstrated as a versatile tool for the preparation of energy storage device electrodes, including supercapacitors, pseudocapacitors, and battery anodes.17,35−39 Significant research has been carried out to study the performance of various materials as anodes for lithium ion batteries, with silicon being distinguished for its ability to maintain high capacities (10X greater than conventional carbon anodes40−42). Alternatively, transition metals are conventionally used as cathodes, due to the ability to achieve high voltage when paired with graphite anodes and inhibit degradation under Li+ oxidation and reduction reactions. However, a challenge for innovation in battery research is to not isolate the performance of a single component (anode, cathode, or electrolyte) of a battery, but instead to harness the versatility to engineer all working components simultaneously and thus engineer the performance of f ull-cells.43 This requires versatility in the materials processing approach that goes beyond applications-based assessment of individual materials using a discovery-driven approach, and can leverage rational design of materials with high throughput for next-generation energy storage systems. Therefore, in this work, we overcome these challenges by demonstrating the operation of a benchtop roll-to-roll platform to produce high-throughput, clean coatings of hybrid materials that can facilitate battery design applications. To demonstrate this approach, we focus specifically on hybrid materials composed of single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) combined with graphene nanoplatelets, MoS2 nanosheets, silicon nanoparticles, and single-walled carbon nanohorns (SWCNH). We demonstrate EPD from polar solvent solutions containing mixtures of these nanostructures in order to form homogeneous coatings that are comprised of hybrid nanostructured materials. These coatings are then assessed for their composition-dependent lithium reduction/oxidation energetics, which leads us to a full-cell battery design with electrodes produced in under 30 s with an optimized design that incorporates silicon nanoparticles as an anode (prelithiated), and MoS2 nanosheets as a cathode. This device is assessed in a full-cell configuration and is found to exhibit energy densities of 167 Wh/kgcell−1 and power densities of 9.6 kW/kgcell−1.

■

solutions were ultrasonicated for 1 h before placement into the roll-toroll system’s reservoir. Electrophoretic Deposition of Hybrid Materials. Roll-to-roll (R2R) electrophoretic deposition of carbon-based nanomaterials was performed in a vertical EPD cell with a separation of 4 mm between a stainless steel counter electrode and the working electrode. For the fabrication of battery films a 316 stainless steel disc (Pred Materials) was mounted to a biased aluminum roller and rolled through the reservoir containing the depositing solution and stainless steel counter electrode under an applied bias of 500 V/cm using a 4 rpm gear motor (Servo City). For mass deposition studies, a 3 × 1.5 cm2 aluminum strip of known mass was mounted to the roller using Teflon clips, mechanically moved into position above the counter electrode, and left to rest in this position under an applied bias of 100 V/cm for the specified time. To demonstrate continuous operation of the coating process, an aluminum roll of dimensions 1 m × 1.5 cm was mounted to either end of the system and continuously moved through solution at a rate of ∼1.5 cm/s under an applied electric field of 500 V/cm. Monitoring of current and the application of voltage was performed using a LabView-operated Keithley 2602A Sourcemeter. In all cases, depositions were parametrized with rolling speed as a fixed parameter, and voltage and deposition time as variable parameters, with the requirement that the total mass of a deposited film could be assessed accurately on an electrode small enough to fit into a coin cell battery testing assembly. For layering deposition studies, a 3 × 1.5 cm2 aluminum strip was coated with a hybrid solution under an applied electric field of 100 V/ cm for 240 s. The coated strip was then left to dry overnight before returning to the bath for an additional coating under identical parameters. To ensure no redissolution of the SWCNTs was occurring during the EPD process, an aluminum strip was coated with SWCNTs using an applied bias of 100 V/cm for 240 s and left to dry overnight. Then, the reservoir was filled with a pristine solution of NMP and identical deposition parameters were carried out. The electrode was left to dry overnight and then the mass of SWCNTs before and after was compared. Roll-to-Roll System Design. The roll-to-roll system was assembled by mounting gear motors (4 rpm, Servo City), powered by a 12 V, 2.5 A power supply (Servo City), onto a custom designed Teflon reservoir. The Teflon reservoir contained a 9 × 2 cm2 well across which two Teflon rollers were mounted and at the bottom of which a 6 × 2 cm2 steel plate was mounted. The roll was composed of a 1 cm × 1 m aluminum strip (Grainger) mounted on both ends to either gear motor. Electrical contact was made to the aluminum roll through a stationary wire brush and contact with the steel counter electrode was achieved using a custom fabricated electrical feedthrough. Potential was applied to the system using a Keithley 2400 Sourcemeter which also served to record the current passed. Silicon Nanoparticle Carbon Passivation. Silicon nanoparticles with carbon surface passivation layers were prepared by placing crystalline silicon nanoparticles in a home-built chemical vapor deposition system using a Lindberg Blue 1″ quartz tube furnace. To achieve carbonization, atmospheric pressure chemical vapor deposition was carried out under a flow rate of 100 sccm Argon and 20 sccm Hydrogen gas (AL Compressed gas). The furnace was then heated to 650 °C at a ramp rate of 70 °C/min and the particles were annealed at that temperature for 10 min. After annealing, a flow rate of 1 sccm C2H2 was introduced and the furnace temperature ramped to 750 °C. Under these conditions, the particles were held at 750 °C for 30 min before ramping the temperature to 850 °C and held for 30 min followed by a final ramp to 900 °C. After 10 min at 900 °C, the C2H2 flow was shut off and the furnace cooled to room temperature under a flow of 100 sccm Argon and 20 sccm Hydrogen. This treatment was observed to leave the surface of the silicon nanoparticles coated by a conformal layer of carbon material, as discussed in previous work.47 Battery Fabrication and Testing. After film deposition the battery electrodes were dismounted from the system and left to dry horizontally overnight on glass slides covered by a Kimwipe. After drying, materials were weighed and then assembled into a coin cell utilizing a half-cell configuration with a lithium metal foil counter

EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

Preparation of Nanostructure Dispersions. For SWCNT materials, a solution of 0.5 mg/mL HiPco SWCNTs (Unidym, purified) dispersed in 1-methyl-2-pyrolidinone (Aldrich, 99.5%) was prepared and left to sit overnight. For hybrid materials, a starting solution of 0.5 mg/mL SWCNT in NMP was mixed with the other carbon nanomaterials, namely, single-walled carbon nanohorns,15,44−46 carbon nanosheets (grade 4, cheaptubes), and carbonized silicon nanoparticles (U.S. Research Nanomaterials, Inc.) at a concentration of 0.5 mg/mL and left to sit overnight. To fabricate the MoS2 hybrid solution used in this work, 20 mg of bulk MoS2 powder (Aldrich, 99%) was mixed into 40 mL NMP and ultrasonicated for 12 h to achieve exfoliation, then, 20 mg of SWCNTs was added to the suspension, and the resulting solution was left to sit overnight. Prior to deposition all B

DOI: 10.1021/acsami.5b01315 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX

Research Article

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces

Figure 1. (A) Schematic of the roll-to-roll system used in this study and (B) the functional system used in this study. (C) Schematic demonstrating the EPD process within the system’s reservoir and (D) an example of a coated roll generated with this process. (E) Mass deposited using this system as a function of applied voltage during a 240 s exposure time and (F) mass deposited as a function of deposition time for all hybrid materials studied. The dotted lines represent fits to the deposition generated from eq 4. electrode, a 1 M LiPF6 ethylene carbonate/dimethyl carbonate (Sigma−Aldrich) electrolyte solution and a Celgard battery separator. Assembly was performed in an argon-filled glovebox with O2 levels 1.5 V potential difference between redox potentials of either electrode (fixed by technological requirements, which are based on conventional alkaline batteries), while utilizing the same electrolyte. To accomplish this, we utilize information obtained from CV analysis to generate a diagram of observed redox potentials (Figure 5A), which is inferred from CV scans. In this case, the redox potential for the MoS2 hybrid material is the highest due to Faradaic storage processes between Li and S species. The higher potential of this system makes MoS2 a candidate for use as the cathode material in a full-cell architecture. Conversely, aside from lithium metal, the Si NPs exhibit a redox potential that is the lowest of those studied in this work. Therefore, Si NPs are a practical choice for an anode material in a full-cell architecture (Figure 5A). As Si NPs do not natively contain Li species, lithiation was achieved for anodes in a full cell configuration by placing the SWCNT−Si NP electrode materials in direct contact with lithium foil for 3 h (Figure 5B). As previously reported, silicon in direct contact with lithium foil will form an Li−Si alloy providing a facile mechanism to fabricate a source for lithium ions during device cycling.62 Compared to previous work by Liu et al.,62 we demonstrate that this prelithiation can be achieved with carbon coated silicon nanoparticles, which in itself is a new observation. In order to characterize the performance of this device, we carried out Galvanostatic charge−discharge measurements at varying currents, with three representative curves for three currents of 100, 1, and 10 A/g (Figure 5C). Notably, at rates appropriate for conventional battery applications (100 G

DOI: 10.1021/acsami.5b01315 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX

Research Article

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces

nanostructure depositions, and considerations for error analysis of main text figures. The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acsami.5b01315.

mA/g), we observed cell capacities of 225 mAh/g, which is comparable to conventional battery systems. However, the nanostructured characteristics of the electrodes, which enable rapid ion insertion from the electrolyte, still enable over 20% of this capacity to be accessed at 100X faster cycling rates, which is not achievable in full-cell battery systems with bulk electrodes. In order to further quantify the cell performance, we performed Ragone analysis to assess the energy-power characteristics of the device based on the total cell mass (Figure 5D). The energy density was calculated based on integration of the Galvanostatic voltage profiles, and power density was calculated as an average value based on the total energy released over the time duration of the discharge. A maximum energy density of 167 Whkgcell−1 was obtained corresponding to a capacity of 225 mAhgcell−1 when operated at 100 mAgcell−1. When operated at high charging currents of 10 Agcell−1, power densities near 10 000 Wkgcell−1 were measured, which is on par with the power capability of many modern day supercapacitors (Figure 5D), while still boasting energy densities near ∼40 Whkgcell−1. Whereas this performance is promising, the nanomanufacturing approach that underlies the ability to produce these electrodes is transferrable to many other applications, such as chemical sensing, optoelectronics, and energy conversion, where clean manufactured hybrid nanostructured materials could lead to improved or ideal performance in these platforms.

■

Corresponding Author

*E-mail: [email protected] (C.L.P.). Notes

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

■

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank D. Geohegan, C. Roleau, and A. Puretzky at ORNL for providing SWCNH materials utilized in this study. Additionally, we thank A. Westover, K. Share, and A. Cohn for discussions about the results of this work. This work was supported by NSF Nanomanufacturing award CMMI 1400424.

■

REFERENCES

(1) Vanli, O. A.; Rivero, I.; Wang, B. Advances in Nanomanufacturing: Process Repeatability, Scalability and Affordability for Nanomaterials and Manufacturing. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2013, 64, 513−514. (2) Busnaina, A.; Mead, J.; Isaacs, J.; Somu, S. Nanomanufacturing and Sustainability: Opportunities and Challenges. J. Nanopart. Res. 2013, 15, 1−6. (3) Wiesner, M. R.; Lowry, G. V.; Alvarez, P.; Dionysiou, D.; Biswas, P. Assessing the Risks of Manufactured Nanomaterials. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40, 4336−4345. (4) Biswas, A.; Bayer, I. S.; Biris, A. S.; Wang, T.; Dervishi, E.; Faupel, F. Advances in Top−Down and Bottom−up Surface Nanofabrication: Techniques, Applications & Future Prospects. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2012, 170, 2−27. (5) Gates, B. D.; Xu, Q. B.; Stewart, M.; Ryan, D.; Willson, C. G.; Whitesides, G. M. New Approaches to Nanofabrication: Molding, Printing, and Other Techniques. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 1171−1196. (6) Gajendran, P.; Devi, N. B.; Devasenathipathy, R. Recent Progress in Electrode Fabrication Materials and Various Insights in Solar Cells: Review. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2015, 10, 3301−3318. (7) de Villoria, R. G.; Hart, A. J.; Wardle, B. L. Continuous HighYield Production of Vertically Aligned Carbon Nanotubes on 2D and 3D Substrates. ACS Nano 2011, 5, 4850−4857. (8) Lee, M. H.; Lim, N.; Ruebusch, D. J.; Jamshidi, A.; Kapadia, R.; Lee, R.; Seok, T. J.; Takei, K.; Cho, K. Y.; Fan, Z.; Jang, H.; Wu, M.; Cho, G.; Javey, A. Roll-to-Roll Anodization and Etching of Aluminum Foils for High-Throughput Surface Nanotexturing. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 3425−3430. (9) Santhanagopalan, S.; Balram, A.; Meng, D. D. Scalable HighPower Redox Capacitors with Aligned Nanoforests of Crystalline MnO2 Nanorods by High Voltage Electrophoretic Deposition. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 2114−2125. (10) Brown, P.; Kamat, P. V. Quantum Dot Solar Cells. Electrophoretic Deposition of CdSe−C60 Composite Films and Capture of Photogenerated Electrons with N C60 Cluster Shell. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 8890−8891. (11) Subramanian, P.; Niedziolka-Jonsson, J.; Lesniewski, A.; Wang, Q.; Li, M.; Boukherroub, R.; Szunerits, S. Preparation of Reduced Graphene Oxide−Ni (OH) 2 Composites by Electrophoretic Deposition: Application for Non-Enzymatic Glucose Sensing. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 5525−5533. (12) Song, K. W.; Costi, R.; Bulović, V. Electrophoretic Deposition of CdSe/ZnS Quantum Dots for Light-Emitting Devices. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 1420−1423. (13) Santhanagopalan, S.; Teng, F.; Meng, D. D. High-Voltage Electrophoretic Deposition for Vertically Aligned Forests of OneDimensional Nanoparticles. Langmuir 2010, 27, 561−569.

■

CONCLUSIONS We demonstrate here the ability to utilize a low-cost (sub$300), benchtop roll-to-roll system for the rapid development of nanomanufactured hybrid nanostructured materials. Our approach depends upon the utilization of surfactant-free NMP polar solvent solutions that both provide stable dispersions of hybrid nanostructure mixtures, and enable controllable EPD processing. Unlike conventional “beaker-scale” EPD routes, the roll-to-roll approach enables greater control over deposition parameters, empowers scalable processing conditions in a laboratory environment that intersects commercial applications, and provides the capability to assemble clean, functional hybrid materials that “bottom-up” fabrication routes are incapable of producing. We specifically demonstrate the fabrication of homogeneous hybrid nanostructured materials containing SWCNTs, SWCNHs, CNSs, Si NPs, and MoS2 nanosheets, and demonstrate the application of these materials into electrodes for a full-cell lithium-ion battery design. Using electrodes that can be fabricated in as little as 30 s, we demonstrate an Si NP−MoS2 all nanostructured material full cell battery that exhibits full cell capacities on par with conventional Li-ion batteries, but with improved power capability. As we envision the bottleneck for many commercial applications of nanomaterials to be low-cost, reliable, and scalable processing routes that build the foundation for product development and design, this nanomanufacturing approach, which seems unlimited in versatility in the choice of materials, brings potential for many applications extending beyond energy storage into areas of energy conversion, sensing, catalysis, optoelectronics, protective coatings, and other areas.

■

AUTHOR INFORMATION

ASSOCIATED CONTENT

* Supporting Information S

Pictures of hybrid nanomaterial dispersions and deposited films from R2R system, cross-sectional SEM images, charge− discharge analysis of hybrid materials, cycling performance for full-cell nanomanufactured MoS2-Si NP battery, data for layered H

DOI: 10.1021/acsami.5b01315 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX

Research Article

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces (14) Chávez-Valdez, A.; Boccaccini, A. R. Innovations in Electrophoretic Deposition: Alternating Current and Pulsed Direct Current Methods. Electrochim. Acta 2012, 65, 70−89. (15) Oakes, L.; Westover, A.; Mahjouri-Samani, M.; Chatterjee, S.; Puretzky, A. A.; Rouleau, C.; Geohegan, D. B.; Pint, C. L. Uniform, Homogenous Coatings of Carbon Nanohorns on Arbitrary Substrates from Common Solvents. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 13153− 13160. (16) Brahma, N.; Talbot, J. B. Effects of CMP Slurry Additives on the Agglomeration of Alumina Nanoparticles 1: General Aggregation Rate Behavior. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2014, 419, 56−60. (17) Gonzalo-Juan, I.; Krejci, A.; Rodriguez, M.; Zhou, Y.; Fichthorn, K.; Dickerson, J. Dipole Moment-Tuned Packing of TiO2 Nanocrystals into Monolayer Films by Electrophoretic Deposition. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014, 105, 113108−1−113108−5. (18) Pascall, A. J.; Qian, F.; Wang, G. M.; Worsley, M. A.; Li, Y.; Kuntz, J. D. Light-Directed Electrophoretic Deposition: A New Additive Manufacturing Technique for Arbitrarily Patterned 3D Composites. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 2252−2256. (19) Kumar, A.; Kazmer, D. O.; Barry, C. M. F.; Mead, J. L. Pulsed Electric Field Assisted Assembly of Polyaniline. Nanotechnology 2012, 23, 335303−1−335303−10. (20) Krejci, A. J.; Gebre, T.; Ruggiero, C. A.; Mochena, M. D.; Dickerson, J. H. Kinetics of Monolayer and Bilayer Nanoparticle Film Formation During Electrophoretic Deposition. Adv. Appl.Ceram. 2014, 113, 50−54. (21) Krishnamurthy, S.; Kamat, P. V. CdSe−Graphene Oxide LightHarvesting Assembly: Size-Dependent Electron Transfer and Light Energy Conversion Aspects. ChemPhysChem 2014, 15, 2129−2135. (22) Golobostanfard, M. R.; Abdizadeh, H.; Mohajerzadeh, S. Incorporation of Carbon Nanotubes in a Hierarchical Porous Photoanode of Tandem Quantum Dot Sensitized Solar Cells. Nanotechnology 2014, 25, 345402. (23) Chavez-Valdez, A.; Shaffer, M. S. P.; Boccaccini, A. R. Applications of Graphene Electrophoretic Deposition. A Review. J. Phys. Chem. B 2013, 117, 1502−1515. (24) Zhu, G.; Pan, L.; Lu, T.; Xu, T.; Sun, Z. Electrophoretic Deposition of Reduced Graphene−Carbon Nanotubes Composite Films as Counter Electrodes of Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 14869−14875. (25) Yang, Y.; Chen, D.; Liu, B.; Zhao, J. Binder-Free Si Nanoparticle Electrode with 3-D Porous Structure Prepared by Electrophoretic Deposition for Lithium-Ion Batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, DOI: 10.1021/acsami.5b00421. (26) Lin, J.-Y.; Chan, C.-Y.; Chou, S.-W. Electrophoretic Deposition of Transparent MoS2−Graphene Nanosheet Composite Films as Counter Electrodes in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 1440−1442. (27) Boccaccini, A.; Cho, J.; Subhani, T.; Kaya, C.; Kaya, F. Electrophoretic Deposition of Carbon Nanotube−Ceramic Nanocomposites. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2010, 30, 1115−1129. (28) Davis, V. A.; Parra-Vasquez, A. N. G.; Green, M. J.; Rai, P. K.; Behabtu, N.; Prieto, V.; Booker, R. D.; Schmidt, J.; Kesselman, E.; Zhou, W.; Fan, H.; Adams, W. W.; Hauge, R. H.; Fischer, J. E.; Cohen, Y.; Talmon, Y.; Smalley, R. E.; Pasquali, M. True Solutions of SingleWalled Carbon Nanotubes for Assembly into Macroscopic Materials. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2009, 4, 830−834. (29) Behabtu, N.; Lomeda, J. R.; Green, M. J.; Higginbotham, A. L.; Sinitskii, A.; Kosynkin, D. V.; Tsentalovich, D.; Parra-Vasquez, A. N. G.; Schmidt, J.; Kesselman, E.; Cohen, Y.; Talmon, Y.; Tour, J. M.; Pasquali, M. Spontaneous High-Concentration Dispersions and Liquid Crystals of Graphene. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2010, 5, 406−411. (30) Pirkle, A.; Chan, J.; Venugopal, A.; Hinojos, D.; Magnuson, C. W.; McDonnell, S.; Colombo, L.; Vogel, E. M.; Ruoff, R. S.; Wallace, R. M. The Effect of Chemical Residues on the Physical and Electrical Properties of Chemical Vapor Deposited Graphene Transferred to SiO2. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2011, 99. (31) Coleman, J. N.; Lotya, M.; O’Neill, A.; Bergin, S. D.; King, P. J.; Khan, U.; Young, K.; Gaucher, A.; De, S.; Smith, R. J.; Shvets, I. V.;

Arora, S. K.; Stanton, G.; Kim, H. Y.; Lee, K.; Kim, G. T.; Duesberg, G. S.; Hallam, T.; Boland, J. J.; Wang, J. J.; Donegan, J. F.; Grunlan, J. C.; Moriarty, G.; Shmeliov, A.; Nicholls, R. J.; Perkins, J. M.; Grieveson, E. M.; Theuwissen, K.; McComb, D. W.; Nellist, P. D.; Nicolosi, V. TwoDimensional Nanosheets Produced by Liquid Exfoliation of Layered Materials. Science 2011, 331, 568−571. (32) Hu, Y. H.; Li, X. F.; Lushington, A.; Cai, M.; Geng, D. S.; Banis, M. N.; Li, R. Y.; Sun, X. L. Fabrication of MoS2−Graphene Nanocomposites by Layer-by-Layer Manipulation for High-Performance Lithium Ion Battery Anodes. ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. 2013, 2, M3034−M3039. (33) Cunningham, G.; Lotya, M.; Cucinotta, C. S.; Sanvito, S.; Bergin, S. D.; Menzel, R.; Shaffer, M. S. P.; Coleman, J. N. Solvent Exfoliation of Transition Metal Dichalcogenides: Dispersibility of Exfoliated Nanosheets Varies Only Weakly between Compounds. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 3468−3480. (34) Carter, R.; Oakes, L.; Cohn, A. P.; Holzgrafe, J.; Zarick, H. F.; Chatterjee, S.; Bardhan, R.; Pint, C. L. Solution Assembled SingleWalled Carbon Nanotube Foams: Superior Performance in Supercapacitors, Lithium-Ion, and Lithium−Air Batteries. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 20137−20151. (35) Cohn, A. P.; Oakes, L.; Carter, R.; Chatterjee, S.; Westover, A. S.; Share, K.; Pint, C. L. Assessing the Improved Performance of Freestanding, Flexible Graphene and Carbon Nanotube Hybrid Foams for Lithium Ion Battery Anodes. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 4669−4675. (36) Hwang, I. S.; Kim, J. C.; Seo, S. D.; Lee, S.; Lee, J. H.; Kim, D. W. A Binder-Free Ge-Nanoparticle Anode Assembled on Multiwalled Carbon Nanotube Networks for Li-Ion Batteries. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 7061−7063. (37) Mazor, H.; Golodnitsky, D.; Burstein, L.; Gladkich, A.; Peled, E. Electrophoretic Deposition of Lithium Iron Phosphate Cathode for Thin-Film 3D-Microbatteries. J. Power Sources 2012, 198, 264−272. (38) Ha, D. H.; Islam, M. A.; Robinson, R. D. Binder-Free and Carbon-Free Nanoparticle Batteries: A Method for Nanoparticle Electrodes without Polymeric Binders or Carbon Black. Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 5122−5130. (39) Wang, M.; Duong, L. D.; Mai, N. T.; Kim, S.; Kim, Y.; Seo, H.; Kim, Y. C.; Jang, W.; Lee, Y.; Suhr, J.; Nam, J.-D. All-Solid-State Reduced Graphene Oxide Supercapacitor with Large Volumetric Capacitance and Ultralong Stability Prepared by Electrophoretic Deposition Method. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2015, 7 (2), 1348− 1354. (40) Chan, C. K.; Peng, H. L.; Liu, G.; McIlwrath, K.; Zhang, X. F.; Huggins, R. A.; Cui, Y. High-Performance Lithium Battery Anodes Using Silicon Nanowires. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2008, 3, 31−35. (41) Yao, Y.; McDowell, M. T.; Ryu, I.; Wu, H.; Liu, N. A.; Hu, L. B.; Nix, W. D.; Cui, Y. Interconnected Silicon Hollow Nanospheres for Lithium-Ion Battery Anodes with Long Cycle Life. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 2949−2954. (42) Cui, L. F.; Yang, Y.; Hsu, C. M.; Cui, Y. Carbon−Silicon CoreShell Nanowires as High Capacity Electrode for Lithium Ion Batteries. Nano Lett. 2009, 9, 3370−3374. (43) Goodenough, J. B.; Park, K. S. The Li-Ion Rechargeable Battery: A Perspective. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 1167−1176. (44) Cheng, M. D.; Lee, D. W.; Zhao, B.; Hu, H.; Styers-Barnett, D. J.; Puretzky, A. A.; DePaoli, D. W.; Geohegan, D. B.; Ford, E. A.; Angelini, P. Formation Studies and Controlled Production of Carbon Nanohorns Using Continuous in Situ Characterization Techniques. Nanotechnology. 2007, 18, 185604. (45) Chandrakumar, K. R. S.; Readle, J. D.; Rouleau, C.; Puretzky, A.; Geohegan, D. B.; More, K.; Krishnan, V.; Tian, M. K.; Duscher, G.; Sumpter, B.; Irle, S.; Morokuma, K. High- Temperature Transformation of Fe-Decorated Single-Wall Carbon Nanohorns to Nanooysters: A Combined Experimental and Theoretical Study. Nanoscale 2013, 5, 1849−1857. (46) Puretzky, A. A.; Styers-Barnett, D. J.; Rouleau, C. M.; Hu, H.; Zhao, B.; Ivanov, I. N.; Geohegan, D. B. Cumulative and Continuous Laser Vaporization Synthesis of Single Wall Carbon Nanotubes and Nanohorns. Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process. 2008, 93, 849−855. I

DOI: 10.1021/acsami.5b01315 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX

Research Article

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces (47) Chatterjee, S.; Carter, R.; Oakes, L.; Erwin, W. R.; Bardhan, R.; Pint, C. L. Electrochemical and Corrosion Stability of Nanostructured Silicon by Graphene Coatings: Toward High Power Porous Silicon Supercapacitors. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 10893−10902. (48) Sarkar, P.; Nicholson, P. S. Electrophoretic Deposition (EPD): Mechanisms, Kinetics, and Application to Ceramics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1996, 79, 1987−2002. (49) Liu, W. W.; Wang, J. N.; Wang, X. X. Charging of Unfunctionalized Graphene in Organic Solvents. Nanoscale 2012, 4, 425−428. (50) Grady, B. P. The Use of Solution Viscosity to Characterize Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Dispersions. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2006, 207, 2167−2169. (51) Anné, G.; Neirinck, B.; Vanmeensel, K.; Biest, O.; Vleugels, J. Origin of the Potential Drop over the Deposit During Electrophoretic Deposition. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2006, 89, 823−828. (52) Shaffer, M. S.; Fan, X.; Windle, A. Dispersion and Packing of Carbon Nanotubes. Carbon 1998, 36, 1603−1612. (53) Halelfadl, S.; Estellé, P.; Aladag, B.; Doner, N.; Maré, T. Viscosity of Carbon Nanotubes Water-based Nanofluids: Influence of Concentration and Temperature. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 2013, 71, 111−117. (54) Huang, Y. Y.; Terentjev, E. M. Dispersion of Carbon Nanotubes: Mixing, Sonication, Stabilization, and Composite Properties. Polymers 2012, 4, 275−295. (55) Cho, J.; Konopka, K.; Rozniatowski, K.; Garcia-Lecina, E.; Shaffer, M. S. P.; Boccaccini, A. R. Characterisation of Carbon Nanotube Films Deposited by Electrophoretic Deposition. Carbon 2009, 47, 58−67. (56) Ng, S. H.; Wang, J. Z.; Wexler, D.; Konstantinov, K.; Guo, Z. P.; Liu, H. K. Highly Reversible Lithium Storage in Spheroidal CarbonCoated Silicon Nanocomposites as Anodes for Lithium-Ion Batteries. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.. 2006, 45, 6896−6899. (57) Gao, B.; Yue, G. Z.; Qiu, Q.; Cheng, Y.; Shimoda, H.; Fleming, L.; Zhou, O. Fabrication and Electron Field Emission Properties of Carbon Nanotube Films by Electrophoretic Deposition. Adv. Mater. 2001, 13, 1770−1773. (58) Pascall, A. J.; Sullivan, K. T.; Kuntz, J. D. Morphology of Electrophoretically Deposited Films on Electrode Strips. J. Phys. Chem. B 2013, 117, 1702−1707. (59) Zhou, L. J.; Hou, Z. F.; Wu, L. M. First-Principles Study of Lithium Adsorption and Diffusion on Graphene with Point Defects. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 21780−21787. (60) Tarascon, J. M.; Armand, M. Issues and Challenges Facing Rechargeable Lithium Batteries. Nature 2001, 414, 359−367. (61) Xu, K. Nonaqueous Liquid Electrolytes for Lithium-Based Rechargeable Batteries. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 4303−4417. (62) Liu, N. A.; Hu, L. B.; McDowell, M. T.; Jackson, A.; Cui, Y. Prelithiated Silicon Nanowires as an Anode for Lithium Ion Batteries. ACS Nano 2011, 5, 6487−6493.

J

DOI: 10.1021/acsami.5b01315 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX