SmMYB111 Is a Key Factor to Phenolic Acid ... - ACS Publications

Subscriber access provided by University of Pennsylvania Libraries

Biotechnology and Biological Transformations

SmMYB111 is a key factor to phenolic acid biosynthesis and interacts with both SmTTG1 and SmbHLH51 in Salvia miltiorrhiza Shasha Li, Yucui Wu, Jing Kuang, Huaiqin Wang, Tangzhi Du, Yaya Huang, Yuan Zhang, Xiaoyan Cao, and Zhezhi Wang J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b02548 • Publication Date (Web): 12 Jul 2018 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on July 16, 2018

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 38

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

1

SmMYB111 is a key factor to phenolic acid biosynthesis and interacts

2

with both SmTTG1 and SmbHLH51 in Salvia miltiorrhiza

3

Shasha Li1#, Yucui Wu2#, Jing Kuang3, Huaiqin Wang1, Tangzhi Du1, Yaya Huang1, Yuan

4

Zhang1, Xiaoyan Cao1*, Zhezhi Wang1*

5

1

6

in Northwest of China, Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education for Medicinal

7

Resources and Natural Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an

8

710062, China;

9

2

National Engineering Laboratory for Resource Development of Endangered Crude Drugs

School of Landscape and Ecological Engineering, Hebei University of Engineering,

10

Handan 056038, China;

11

3

12

# These authors contributed equally to this work.

13

*Authors for correspondence:

14

Xiaoyan Cao (Tel: 86-29-85310266 Email: [email protected] ORCID ID:

15

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3188-6663)

16

Zhezhi Wang (Tel: 86-29-85310260 Email: [email protected]

17

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6111-1551)

Ningxia Polytechnic, Yinchuan 750001, China;

18

1

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

ORCID ID:


Page 2 of 38

19

Abstract

20

Transcription factors that include myeloblastosis (MYB), basic helix–loop–helix (bHLH),

21

and

22

the phenylpropanoid pathway. However only a few MYB and bHLH members involved in

23

the biosynthesis of salvianolic acid B (Sal B) have been reported, and little is known about

24

Sal B pathway regulation by the WD40 protein transparent testa glabra1 (TTG1)-dependent

25

transcriptional complexes in Salvia miltiorrhiza. We isolated SmTTG1 from that species for

26

detailed functional characterization. Enhanced or reduced expression of SmTTG1 was

27

achieved by gain- or loss-of-function assays, respectively, revealing that SmTTG1 is

28

necessary for Sal B biosynthesis. Interaction partners of SmTTG1 protein were screened by

29

yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) assays with the cDNA library of S. miltiorrhiza. A new

30

R2R3-MYB transcription factor, SmMYB111, was found through this screening.

31

Transgenic plants over-expressing or showing reduced expression of SmMYB111

32

up-regulated or deregulated, respectively, the yields of Sal B. Both Y2H and Bimolecular

33

Fluorescent Complementation experiments demonstrated that SmMYB111 interacts with

34

SmTTG1 and SmbHLH51, a positive regulator of the phenolic acid pathway. Our data

35

verified the function of SmTTG1 and SmMYB111 in regulating phenolic acid biosynthesis

36

in S. miltiorrhiza. Furthermore, ours is the first report of the potential ternary transcription

37

complex SmTTG1–SmMYB111–SmbHLH51, which is involved in the production of Sal B

38

in that species.

39

Keywords: Salvia miltiorrhiza; salvianolic acid B; SmTTG1; SmMYB111; transcription

40

complex.

WD-repeat

protein,

which

often

forms

a

41 2


ternary

complex

to

regulate

Page 3 of 38


42

Introduction

43

Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge is a perennial medicinal plant with great medicinal and

44

economic value.1 Its dry roots have been used for more than two thousand years in

45

traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) to treat various diseases, such as cardiovascular

46

diseases, coronary heart diseases, dysmenorrhea, and amenorrhoea.2, 3 It presents a model

47

plant system for TCM research because of its high transformation efficiency, short life

48

cycle, published whole genome data, and reliable therapeutic actions.4 The active

49

pharmaceutical ingredients of danshen include two major groups: lipophilic tanshinones5

50

and hydrophilic salvianolic acids.6 Among the phenolic acids, salvianolic acid B (Sal B)

51

is predominant and is regarded as a powerful natural product

52

properties and scavenging of free radicals.7 It offers protection against fibrosis, tumor

53

development, aging, and cardiovascular/cerebrovascular diseases.7, 8

for its antioxidant

54

The biosynthetic pathway of Sal B is thought to include both phenylpropanoid and

55

tyrosine-derived pathways.9 The former is a general pathway for the synthesis of phenolic

56

acids, flavonoids (e.g., anthocyanins and flavones), and lignins.9, 10 Although Sal B is an

57

important medicinal component, only relatively low levels are produced by S. miltiorrhiza

58

plants. Therefore, biological approaches have been taken to augment its synthesis,

59

including the engineering of genes in the biosynthetic pathway and ectopic expression of

60

transcription factors (TFs).11-15 For example, ectopic overexpression of AtPAP1, a MYB

61

TF gene from Arabidopsis thaliana, can strongly enrich Sal B in S. miltiorrhiza.11

62

Myeloblastosis (MYB) TF plays a key role in regulating plant flavonoid biosynthesis

63

that interact with basic helix–loop–helix (bHLH) and transparent testa glabra1 (TTG1), a 3



64

WD40 repeat protein, to form MBW complexes and control the phenylpropanoid

65

pathway.16-21 Arabidopsis bHLHs from subgroup IIIf (including GL3, EGL3, MYC1, and

66

TT8) and MYBs (e.g., PAP1/2/3/4, TT2, AtMYB5, and AtMYB4) directly interact with

67

TTG1 to form MBW complexes and play a transcriptional role in the biosynthesis of

68

flavonoids.17, 22, 23 Wan et al.24 have shown that PtrMYB57–bHLH131–PtrTTG1 negatively

69

regulates the biosynthesis of anthocyanins and proanthocyanidins in Populus trichocarpa.

70

Although a few endogenous MYBs and bHLHs are reported to be involved in modulating

71

Sal B biosynthesis,25-30 little is known about this regulatory role by TTG1 and

72

TTG1-dependent transcriptional complexes in S. miltiorrhiza.

73

The WD40 repeat protein TTG1 is encoded by single-copy genes, which is the common

74

denominator of overlapping regulatory complexes.31,

32

75

controlling development and secondary metabolism, such as the formation of trichomes,

76

synthesis of flavonoids, seed coat mucilage, and root hair development.32 This TTG1

77

commonly acts as a scaffold for the combinational interactions between the MYB and

78

bHLH, which are indispensable for regulating the transcriptional activity of the MBW

79

complex.33, 34

It only exists in higher plants,

80

Here, we explored the function of SmTTG1 in S. miltiorrhiza through experiments with

81

overexpression and RNAi-mediated silencing. Our results indicated that SmTTG1 is

82

necessary for Sal B biosynthesis. Using SmTTG1 as bait, we then screened a new MYB TF

83

from the S. miltiorrhiza cDNA library by yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) assays and named it

84

SmMYB111. Transgenic plants over-expressing or silencing SmMYB111 significantly

85

induced or reduced, respectively, the accumulation of Sal B. Both Y2H and Bimolecular 4


Page 4 of 38

Page 5 of 38


86

Fluorescent Complementation (BiFC) experiments demonstrated that SmMYB111 interacts

87

not only with SmTTG1 but also with SmbHLH51, a positive regulator of this phenolic acid

88

pathway. We speculated that SmMYB111 positively regulates the synthesis of phenolic

89

acids -- Sal B and rosmarinic acid (RA) -- in S. miltiorrhiza by forming SmTTG1–

90

SmMYB111–SmbHLH51 ternary transcription complex.

91

Materials and Methods

92

Culture and Treatment of S. miltiorrhiza

93

Seeds of S. miltiorrhiza were collected from the experimental fields of Shaanxi Normal

94

University. Sterile plantlets were produced as previously described35. Roots, stems, leaves,

95

and flowers from two-year-old greenhouse-grown plants were collected in July for RNA

96

extraction. Standards of RA and Sal B were prepared as we described previously.11 All the

97

primers used in the study are listed in Table S1.

98

Two-month-old S. miltiorrhiza seedlings were sprayed with 500 µM methyl jasmonate

99

(MeJA), 500 µM salicylic acid (SA), or 50 µM gibberellin (GA) (100 mL per plantlet).

100

Roots were sampled after 0, 2, 6, 8, 12, 48, and 72 h of treatment and each sample included

101

six plantlets. Plantlets receiving only sterile water were used as controls.

102

Isolation and Sequence Analysis of SmTTG1 and SmMYB111

103

Genomic DNA and transcriptome cDNA was obtained as we described previously.36

104

SmTTG1 (GenBank Accession Number JX416285) and SmMYB111 (GenBank Accession

105

Number ASV64719.1) were cloned from the S. miltiorrhiza genomic DNA and

106

transcriptome cDNA with primers SmTTG1-F/R and SmMYB111-F/R, respectively. The

107

amplified products were inserted into the pMD19-T simple vector (TaKaRa) and 5



108

followed by sequencing.

109

Homologous protein sequences of SmMYB111 were aligned by CLUSTAL W (version

110

1.83). We constructed the phylogenetic tree by Molecular Evolutionary Genetics

111

Analysis software (MEGA 5.2) using the Neighbor-Joining method. The GenBank

112

accession numbers for all genes are listed in Table S2.

113

Yeast Two-hybrid Screening

114

The open reading frame (ORF) of SmTTG1 was amplified with primers 207‒

115

SmTTG1-F/R and cloned into donor vector pDONR207 to construct entry vector

116

pENTR207‒SmTTG1, and then transferred into pGBKT7 (BD) to construct pGBKT7‒

117

SmTTG1 according to the Gateway manufacturer’s protocol (Invitrogen, USA).

118

The autoactivation and toxicity test of bait protein SmTTG1 in yeast was performed as

119

described by Pan et al.37 Briefly, we transformed bait plasmid pGBKT7‒SmTTG1 into

120

AH109 yeast cells according to the instructions in the HighTM AH109 Competent Cell

121

Manual (Clontech, USA). Transformants were then put on agar plates containing

122

appropriate selection media, i.e., SD/-Trp/X-α-gal or SD/-Trp/-His/-Ade/X-α-gal, then

123

incubated at 29°C for 3 d before recording the growth. The pGBKT7 was used as a control.

124

To screen the host proteins that interact with SmTTG1, we used Y187 yeast cells

125

expressing the S. miltiorrhiza cDNA library to mate with AH109 cells expressing SmTTG1,

126

following the protocols described previously.37

127

Yeast Two-hybrid Assays

128

The ORFs of SmTTG1, SmMYB111, and SmbHLH51 (GenBank Accession Number

129

KT215166) were cloned into the donor vector pDONR207 to generate entry vector 6


Page 6 of 38

Page 7 of 38


130

pENTR207‒SmTTG1, pENTR207‒SmMYB111, and pENTR207‒SmbHLH51, respectively.

131

They were then transferred into destination vector pGADT7 or pGBKT7 to construct

132

pGADT7‒SmTTG1/SmMYB111 or pGBKT7‒SmTTG1/SmbHLH51/SmMYB111 according

133

to the Gateway protocol. The resulting pGADT7 and pGBKT7 fusion constructs were

134

co-transformed into yeast strain AH109 as described by Gietz and Schiestl.38 The

135

interaction assays were performed based on the manufacturer’s protocol of Matchmaker

136

Gold Yeast Two-Hybrid System (Clontech), and Y2H images were taken on Day 5 of

137

incubation.

138

Bimolecular Fluorescent Complementation and Subcellular Localization

139

Primers 207‒SmTTG1-F/Rʹ, 207‒SmMYB111-F/Rʹ, and 207‒SmbHLH51-F/Rʹ were

140

designed (stop codons removed) to clone SmTTG1, SmMYB111, and SmbHLH51 into the

141

donor

142

pENTR207‒SmMYB111ʹ, and pENTR207‒SmbHLH51ʹ, respectively.

vector

pDONR207

and

construct entry

vectors

pENTR207‒SmTTG1ʹ,

143

For BiFC assays, pENTR207‒SmTTG1ʹ, pENTR207‒SmMYB111ʹ, and pENTR207‒

144

SmbHLH51ʹ were recombined into pEarleyGate202-YC (YC) or pEarleyGate201-YN (YN)

145

to construct BIFC expression vectors YC‒SmTTG1, YN‒SmMYB111, YN‒SmbHLH51 and

146

YC‒SmbHLH51. The YC and YN recombinant plasmids were mixed at equal density

147

before co-transformation. Co-transformation of YC‒SmTTG1+YN, YN‒SmMYB111+YC,

148

and YC‒SmbHLH51+ YN served as negative controls.

149

For subcellular localizations, pENTR207‒SmTTG1ʹ and pENTR207‒SmMYB111ʹ

150

were recombined into destination vector pEarleyGate10339 to construct subcellular

151

localization

expression

vectors

pSmTTG1‒GFP

and

7


pSmMYB111‒GFP.

The


152

pEarleyGate103 was used as a positive control.

153

Vectors were bombarded into onion epidermal cells using Gene Gun PDS-1000

154

(Bio-Rad, USA) at a helium pressure of 1100 psi. After 16 to 24 h of incubation

155

at 28°C in a dark chamber, the GFP fluorescence images from living cells were observed

156

using a Leica DM6000B microscope (Leica, Germany) with an excitation wavelength

157

of 475 nm.

158

Construction of Plant Expression Vectors and Plant Transformation

159

To obtain SmTTG1 and SmMYB111 overexpression vectors pEarleyGate 202‒SmTTG1 and

160

pEarleyGate 202‒SmMYB111, we used pENTR207‒SmTTG1 and pENTR207‒SmMYB111

161

to recombine SmTTG1 and SmMYB111 into the destination vector pEarleyGate 202. 39

162

SmTTG1-RNAi plasmid was constructed according to the methods we established

163

previously.36, Briefly,the 279-bp fragment of SmTTG1 cDNA (coding sequence positions

164

44-323 bp) were digested with BamHI/XbaI and KpnI/XhoI (TaKaRa) and inserted into

165

vector pKannibal40 to generate pK‒SmTTG1. An interfering box was inserted into pART27

166

to generate RNAi vector pSmTTG1–RNAi.

167

To construct the amiRNA-mediated SmMYB111-silenced recombinant expression

168

vector, we designed a pair of amiRNA oligonucleotide primers, amiR–SmMYB111-F/R,

169

using P‒SAMS software (http://p-sams.carringtonlab.org/). This synthesized amiRNA

170

cassette was then inserted into the pMDC123SB-AtMIR390a-B/c vector by BsaI

171

digestion. 41

172 173

S. miltiorrhiza transformation was performed based on protocols established in our laboratory. 42 8


Page 8 of 38

Page 9 of 38


174

Molecular Detection of Transgenic Plantlets

175

The CaMV35S promoter was amplified from genomic DNA to check whether the gene had

176

been integrated into the transgenic plant genome, using previously published protocols.36

177

Total RNA from the roots of S. miltiorrhiza transgenic and wild-type (WT) plants was

178

extracted and converted into cDNA. Gene expression was monitored via qRT-PCR on a

179

LightCycler® 96 real-time PCR detection system (Roche, Switzerland), with housekeeping

180

gene SmUbiquitin serving as an internal reference. Relative expression level of each gene,

181

expressed as fold change relative to controls, was calculated by the comparative CT

182

method.43

183

Based on the transcriptional levels of SmMYB111, we conducted qRT-PCR to determine

184

the expression levels of key enzyme genes for the biosynthetic pathway of salvianolic

185

acids.

186

Determination of Phenolics Concentrations by LC/MS Analysis

187

Roots from two-month-old transgenic plants of S. miltiorrhiza were collected and dried at

188

20±2°C. The phenolic compounds were extracted as described previously.11

189

We determined the content of RA and Sal B on an Agilent 1260 HPLC system coupled

190

to an Agilent 6460 QQQ LC-MS system. The extracts were diluted 1000 times and

191

separated on a Welch Ultimate XB-C18 column (2.1 × 150 mm, 3 µm). Chromatographic

192

separations were performed over a 10-min time span, using organic mobile phase

193

acetonitrile as solvent A and aqueous mobile phase with 0.1% formic acid (v/v, in

194

deionized water) as solvent B. The linear gradient comprised 20% to 60% A (0–6 min),

195

60% to 20% A (6–7 min), and 20% to 20% A (7–10 min). The flow rate was set at 9



Page 10 of 38

196

0.4 mL/min. Conditions for mass spectrometry were as follows: negative mode; drying

197

gas flow rate was set at, 10 L/min and temperature 300°C; nebulizer pressure, 45 psi; ion

198

spray voltage, 3500 V; and sheath gas of 11 L/min, at a temperature of 350°C. Retention

199

times were 3.8 min for RA and 4.1 min for Sal B. The precursor/product ion of RA is

200

359.1>161; Sal B is 717.2>519.2. We established standard curves of authentic reference

201

standards to quantify these phenolics concentrations.

202

Determination of Anthocyanin Concentrations

203

Anthocyanin concentrations were determined from the roots of two-month-old transgenic

204

and WT S. miltiorrhiza, following quantification protocols that we have described

205

previously.11

206

Results

207

Generation

208

miltiorrhiza Plants

209

Transgenic plants of S. miltiorrhiza that either over-expressed or suppressed SmTTG1

210

were confirmed by PCR, which contain an expected 901-bp fragment of the CaMV35S

211

promoter (Figure S1). The expression level of SmTTG1 in the transgenics was examined

212

by qRT-PCR (Figure 1). Two independent SmTTG1-overexpressing lines (OT-10 and

213

OT-14) with significantly elevated SmTTG1 expression and two SmTTG1-RNAi lines

214

(iT-2 and iT-3) with significantly reduced expression were selected for further analysis.

215

The controls for this analysis were untransformed WT plants (CK).

of

SmTTG1-overexpressing

and

SmTTG1-RNAi

Transgenic

S.

216

Compared with the CK, the transgenic plantlets showed obvious phenotypic changes.

217

Whereas stems from CK and OT samples were partially red, those from iTs were 10


Page 11 of 38


218

completely green. Anthocyanin concentrations were significantly lower in the roots from

219

iT plants than from the CK, which indicated that SmTTGl is involved in the regulation of

220

anthocyanin biosynthesis in S. miltiorrhiza. Furthermore, the stems from OT plants had

221

significantly more trichomes when compared with the CK, while the iT plants had very

222

few trichomes (Figure 1), indicating that SmTTG1 favors trichome formation.

223

SmTTG1 Regulates the Production of Sal B and RA in S. miltiorrhiza

224

Results from LC/MS showed that the concentrations of RA and its dimer Sal B in the

225

roots of two-month-old S. miltiorrhiza plantlets did not differ significantly between CK

226

samples and overexpressing lines OT-10 and OT-14 (Figure 2). However, when

227

compared with CK, the levels of both components were significantly lower (P

SmMYB111 Is a Key Factor to Phenolic Acid ... - ACS Publications

Recommend Documents