Subscriber access provided by UNIV OF TEXAS DALLAS
Bioactive Constituents, Metabolites, and Functions
Spent coffee grounds extract rich in manooligosaccharides promote a healthier gut microbial community in a dose dependent manner Sergio Pérez-Burillo, Silvia Pastoriza, Alejandro Fernández-Arteaga, German Luzón, Nuria Jiménez-Hernández, Giuseppe D'Auria, Pilar Francino, and José A. Rufián-Henares J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b06604 • Publication Date (Web): 06 Feb 2019 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on February 7, 2019
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 37
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Spent coffee grounds extract rich in manooligosaccharides promote a healthier gut microbial community in a dose dependent manner
Sergio Pérez-Burillo1, Silvia Pastoriza1, Alejandro Fernández-Arteaga2, Germán Luzón2, Nuria Jiménez-Hernández3, Giuseppe D’Auria3, M. Pilar Francino3,4 & José Ángel RufiánHenares1,5*
1Departamento
de Nutrición y Bromatología, Instituto de Nutrición y Tecnología de los
Alimentos, Centro de Investigación Biomédica, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain. 2Departamento
de Ingeniería Química, Facultad de Ciencias,
Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain. 3Unitat
Mixta d’Investigació en Genòmica i Salut, Fundació per al Foment de la
Investigació Sanitària i Biomèdica de la Comunitat Valenciana (FISABIO-Salut Pública) / Institut de Biologia Integrativa de Sistemes (Universitat de València), València, Spain 4CIBER 5Instituto
en Epidemiología y Salud Pública, Madrid, Spain
de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain.
* Corresponding author: Telephone: +34 958 24 28 41 E-mail:
[email protected] 1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
1
Page 2 of 37
ABSTRACT
2
Coffee is one of the most consumed beverages around the world and as a
3
consequence, spent coffee grounds are a massively produced residue that is causing
4
environmental problems. Reusing them is a major focus of interest nowadays. We extracted
5
mannoligosaccharides (MOS) from spent coffee grounds and submitted them to an in vitro
6
fermentation with human feces. Results obtained suggest that MOS are able to exert a
7
prebiotic effect on gut microbiota by stimulating the growth of some beneficial genera such
8
as
9
Pseudoflavonifractor, or Veillonella. Moreover, SCFA production also increased in a dose
10
dependent manner. However, we observed that 5-hydroxymethylfurfural, furfural and
11
polyphenols (which are either produced or released from spent coffee grounds matrix
12
during hydrolysis) could have an inhibitory effect on some beneficial genera such as
13
Faecalibacterium, Ruminococcus, Blautia, Butyricimonas, Dialister, Collinsella, or
14
Anaerostipes which could affect negatively to the prebiotic activity of MOS.
Barnesiella,
Odoribacter,
Coprococcus,
Butyricicoccus,
Intestinimonas,
15 16 17
KEY WORDS: Mannooligosaccharides, mannan, MOS, short chain fatty acids, gut microbiota, prebiotic activity, 5-hydroxymethylfurfural, polyphenols.
18 19 20 21 22 23 2 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 3 of 37
24 25
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Introduction
26
Coffee brew is consumed all over the world and, in fact, is the food product most
27
consumed in the world, after water.1 Coffee has been related to health since ancient times
28
and still today is the main object of study in many research projects related to chronic
29
diseases.2 Coffee is thought to have a protective role on health, mostly due to its
30
phytochemical compounds such as chlorogenic acids and other polyphenolic substances.3
31
However, carbohydrates also account for an important part of the coffee bean. In green
32
coffee, carbohydrates account for up to 60% of the dry weight, with sucrose as the main
33
monosaccharide. Among polysaccharides, which can range from 37 to 55% of the dry
34
weight, cellulose, hemicellulose, galactomannans and arabinogalactans are found. Although
35
galactomannans are the main polysaccharide present in beans, in coffee infusion they are
36
not the main ones due to a low solubility.4 On the other hand, roasting has an important
37
influence on carbohydrate content. Sucrose and low molecular weight oligosaccharides are
38
almost completely degraded whereas polysaccharide content is reduced to around 24-39%
39
of the dry weight. Roasting also partially hydrolyses polysaccharides to a lower degree of
40
polymerization making them more soluble.5
41
Due to its high consumption, coffee by-products are massively produced specially
42
spent coffee grounds. The main problem is that they are not properly disposed of,
43
generating a growing environmental concern.5,6 Therefore, spent coffee grounds have
44
become a major focus of interest regarding their reutilization as a source of bioactive
45
compounds.7-12
46
Since hot water is not able to extract the whole carbohydrate fraction during coffee
47
brewing, spent coffee grounds are still rich in polysaccharides, with galactomannans 3 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
48
representing around 50% of them and arabinogalactans and cellulose accounting for the
49
other 50%.4 Therefore, mannanoligosaccharides (MOS) are one of the bioactive compounds
50
that can be obtained from spent coffee grounds. MOS are short chain carbohydrates
51
produced from coffee galactomannans usually through acid, alkaline or enzymatic
52
hydrolysis.13 Their physiological effects arise from different functional properties: they are
53
able to enhance the growth of beneficial bacteria, decrease blood pressure, reduce fat
54
absorption, or decrease attachment of pathogenic bacteria to the intestinal mucosa.14-15
55
Finding ingredients that can promote the growth of beneficial gut bacteria is
56
becoming a major focus of interest in order to produce functional foods. That is because
57
now it is very clear that the gut microbiota has important implications in different diseases
58
and is therefore closely related to health status.16 In this sense, the gut microbiota has been
59
linked to inflammatory bowel disease,17,18 obesity,19,
60
immune system disorders,22 among others. It has been reported that around 40 g of
61
polysaccharides reach the colon every day, being an important source of nutrients for gut
62
microbes and acting as prebiotic agents that enhance the growth of some of them.23 The
63
metabolization of fiber takes places specially in the proximal colon resulting in the
64
production of several metabolites such as short chain fatty acids (SCFAs), mainly acetate,
65
propionate and butyrate, which have an important role in host health, not only in the gut.24
66
Dietary fiber is the main nutrient for gut microbes and it has been proven to modulate gut
67
microbiota in vitro and in vivo with beneficial effects for host health.23
20
autism spectrum disorders,21 and
68
Taking all this information into account, the objective of this study was to evaluate
69
the effects of MOS produced from spent coffee grounds on gut microbial communities and
70
also on SCFAs production, after in vitro fermentation with human fecal samples.
71 4 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 4 of 37
Page 5 of 37
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
72
Materials and methods
73
Reagents
74
Acetic, formic and propionic acids, 1-phenyl-3-methyl-5-pyrazolone (PMP),
75
chloroform, mannose, manobiose, manotriose, manotetraose, mannopentaose and
76
mannohexaose standards, sodium di-hydrogen phosphate, tryptone, cysteine, sodium
77
sulphide, resazurin, Folin-Ciocalteu reagent, sodium carbonate, gallic acid, 5-
78
(Hydroxymethyl)furfural (HMF), furfural and acetonitrile (HPLC grade) were purchased
79
from Sigma-Aldrich (Darmstadt, Germany).
80 81
Samples
82
A mix of spent coffee grounds and water (10% w/w) was hydrolyzed in a reactor
83
(270 mL of distilled water and 30 g of spent coffee grounds) by applying high temperatures
84
and high pressure for 60 minutes and taking samples after 10 minutes, 30 minutes and 60
85
minutes. Four experiments were carried out varying only the temperature: experiment A
86
was carried out at 220 oC, experiment B was carried out at 185 oC, experiment C was
87
carried out at 170 oC and experiment D was carried out at 180 oC. Each experiment was
88
composed of the three samples taken after 10 minutes, 30 minutes and 60 minutes. Aliquots
89
were taken and stored at -80 oC for MOS quantification, HMF, furfural and total
90
polyphenols quantification and for in vitro fermentation.
91 92
In vitro fermentation
93
The in vitro fermentation method was carried out according to the protocol
94
described by Pérez-Burillo et al.25 A Fecal sample from four healthy donors (not taking
95
antibiotics, people with body mass index within the “normal weight range”: mean Body 5 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
96
Mass Index = 21.3), was obtained in the morning, placed in sterile containers and stored at
97
4 oC until the inoculum was prepared (as an equal mixture of feces from all four donors).
98
Briefly, 0.5 mL of MOS mixture obtained from the reactor was placed in a screw-cap tube.
99
Then, 7.5 mL of fermentation medium (948.75 mL of peptone water (15 g/L), 50 mL of
100
reductive solution (312 mg of cysteine and 312 mg of sodium sulphide in 48 mL of water
101
and 2 mL of NaOH 1M), and 1.25 mL of resazurin (0.1% w/v)) and 2 mL of inoculum
102
(consisting of a solution of 32% faeces in phosphate buffer 100 mM, pH 7.0) were added,
103
to reach a final volume of 10 mL. Nitrogen was bubbled through the mix to produce an
104
anaerobic atmosphere and the mix was then incubated at 37 ºC for 24 hours under
105
oscillation. Immediately afterwards, the samples were immersed in ice, to stop microbial
106
activity. Aliquots were taken for DNA isolation and SCFAs analysis and stored at -80 ºC
107
until analysis.
108 109
Short chain fatty acids determination
110
Short chain fatty acid (SCFAs) determination was performed on the supernatant
111
obtained after in vitro fermentation. The analysis was carried out according to the
112
procedure described by Panzella et al.11 with few modifications. SCFAs determination was
113
carried out on Accela 600 HPLC (Thermo Scientific) equipped with a pump, an
114
autosampler and a UV-VIS PDA detector set at 210 nm; the mobile phase used was 0.1 M
115
phosphate buffer (pH 2.8)/acetonitrile 99:1 v/v delivered at a 1.25 mL/min flow rate; the
116
column used was an Aquasil C18 reverse phase (Thermo Scientific) (150 × 4.6 mm, 5 µm),
117
with a total run-time of 30 min.
118
The sample did not require any pretreatment before injecting. Briefly, the SCFA
119
standards were prepared in the mobile phase at concentrations ranging from 5 to 10000 6 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 6 of 37
Page 7 of 37
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
120
ppm. After the fermentation process, 1 mL of MOS fermentation supernatant was
121
centrifuged to remove solid particles, filtered through a 0.22 m nylon filter and finally
122
transferred to a vial for HPLC analysis. Results are expressed as mol/g of spent coffee
123
grounds. Chromatograms are depicted in Figures S1A-S1C.
124 125
MOS HPLC determination
126
Pre-column derivatization: MOS mixtures obtained from the reactor were labeled
127
with PMP following the procedure described by Zang et al.26 with few modifications.
128
Briefly, 0.1 mL of sample was mixed in a screw-cap pyrex tube with 0.1 mL of NaOH 0.3
129
M. Right after, 0.12 mL of PMP 0.5 M was added and the mixture was vortexed for 10
130
seconds and placed at 70 oC for 60 minutes. Thereafter, 0.1 mL of HCl 0.3 M was added to
131
neutralize the NaOH. The mixture was then mixed with 0.5 mL of chloroform, vortexed,
132
and the aqueous layer collected, discarding the organic one. This step was done two more
133
times. Samples were filtered through a 0.22 m filter and injected in the HPLC.
134
HPLC analysis: Determination of MOS was carried out on Accela 600 HPLC
135
(Thermo Scientific) equipped with a pump, an autosampler and a UV-VIS PDA detector set
136
at 245 nm; the mobile phase used was A) Milli-Q water with 0.1% of formic acid, and B)
137
acetonitrile with 0.1% of formic acid running with the following gradient: 2% of B to 20%
138
of B in 25 minutes (0-25 minute), 20% of B for 15 minutes (25-40 minute), 20% of B to
139
2% of B in 5 minutes (40-45 minute), and 2% of B for 15 minutes (45-60 minute). Standard
140
curves were performed for each sugar in the range of 5-0.15 ppm. The column used was an
141
Accucore C18 reversed phase 150 mm x 2.1 mm and 2.6 μm of particle size. Results are
7 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
142
expressed as mg/g of spent coffee grounds. Chromatograms are depicted in Figures S1D-
143
S1F.
144 145
Folin-Ciocalteu total phenolics assay
146
Total phenolic content was estimated following the procedure described by
147
Singleton and Rossi27 with few modifications and adapted to a microplate reader. The assay
148
was performed on the samples obtained from the reactor. Briefly, sodium carbonate 10%
149
was prepared and then the needed volume was diluted to 2.35%. 30 µL of sample were
150
placed by triplicate in the wells of a transparent 96-well polystyrene microplate (Biogen
151
Científica, Spain), followed by 255 µL of the sodium carbonate and finally 15 µL of the
152
Folin-Ciocalteu reagent. Absorbance lectures at 725 nm were taken for 60 minutes at 37 oC.
153
The equipment used was a FLUOStar Omega microplate reader (BMG Labtech, Germany).
154
A calibration curve was performed using gallic acid as the standard with concentrations
155
ranging from 0.01 to 1.00 mg/mL. The results obtained are expressed as mol gallic acid
156
equivalents (GAE) per g of spent coffee grounds.
157 158
HMF and furfural assay
159
HMF and furfural determination was performed according to the method described
160
by Rufián-Henares et al.28 One mL of the MOS mixture taken from the reactor was
161
centrifuged at 10000 rpm for 5 minutes. Then, it was filtered through a 0.22 m filter. The
162
sample was ready for HPLC injection. Determination was carried out on Accela 600 HPLC
163
(Thermo Scientific) equipped with a pump, an autosampler and a UV-VIS PDA detector set
164
at 284 nm. The mobile phase was made up of a mixture of acetonitrile in water (5% v/v)
8 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 8 of 37
Page 9 of 37
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
165
delivered at the flow rate of 1 mL/min under isocratic conditions through C18 reverse phase
166
column. 20 L of sample were injected. HMF and furfural was quantified by the external
167
standard method within the range 0.01–50.00 mg/L. Results are expressed as mg/g of spent
168
coffee grounds.
169 170
DNA extraction and sequencing
171
DNA extraction was performed using a NucliSENSEasyMAG platform
172
(Biomérieux) following the standard protocol. Microbial genomic DNA was used at a
173
concentration of 5 ng/μL in 10 mMTris (pH 8.5) for the Illumina protocol for 16S rRNA
174
gene Metagenomic Sequencing Library Preparation (Cod. 15044223 Rev. A). PCR primers
175
targeting the 16S rRNA gene V3 and V4 regions were designed as in Klindworth et al.29
176
Primer
177
TGTATAAGAGACAGCCTACGGGNGGCWGCA-G3’
178
CGTGGGCTCGGAGATGTGTATAAGAGACAGGACTACHVGGGTATCTAATCC3’.
179
Primers contained adapter overhang sequences added to the gene-specific sequences,
180
making them compatible with the Illumina Nextera XT Index kit (FC-131-1096). After 16S
181
rRNA gene amplification, amplicons were multiplexed and 1 mL of amplicon pool was run
182
on a Bioanalyzer DNA 1000 chip to verify amplicon size (~550 bp). After size verification,
183
libraries were sequenced in an Illumina MiSeq sequencer according to manufacturer’s
184
instructions in a 2x300 cycles paired-end run (MiSeq Reagent kit v3 MS-102-3001).
sequences
are:
Forward
5’TCGTCGGCAGCGTCAGATG-
185 186
Bioinformatic analysis
9 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
and
Reverse
5’GTCT-
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
187
Quality assessment of sequencing reads was performed with the prinseq-lite
188
program applying the following parameters:30 a minimal length (min_length) of 50 nt and a
189
quality score threshold of 30 from the 3’-end (trim_qual_right), using a mean quality score
190
(trim_qual_type) calculated with a sliding window of 10 nucleotides (trim_qual_window).
191
Read 1 and read 2 from Illumina sequencing where joined using fastq-join from the ea-tools
192
suite.31 Taxonomic affiliations were assigned using the RDP_classifier from the Ribosomal
193
Database Project (RDP).32 Reads that had an RDP score below 0.8 were assigned to the
194
next higher taxonomic rank, leaving the last rank as unidentified. We assigned 6 taxonomic
195
levels, which were kingdom, phylum, class, order, family and genus.
196 197
Statistical analysis
198
Pearson correlations were carried out through multivariate analysis with
199
Statgraphics Centurion XVI.I. Bacterial abundances between groups, SCFA, HMF and
200
polyphenols were compared by analysis of variance (ANOVA) at p < 0.05 confidence level
201
with Statgraphics Centurion XVI.I and R software.
202 203
Results and discussion
204
MOS quantification
205
MOS quantification was carried out after 10, 30 and 60 minutes of hydrolysis in
206
every experiment. For each sample, mannose, mannobiose, mannotriose, mannotetraose,
207
mannopentaose and mannohexaose were determined. Table 1 shows the MOS content in
208
each sample. All carbohydrates were detected except mannotetraose. After 10 minutes,
209
temperature was not stable yet and MOS values are similar among the different
210
experiments. However, experiment B had significantly lower (p < 0.05) amounts of total 10 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 10 of 37
Page 11 of 37
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
211
MOS than the other experiments. The highest levels of mannose, mannobiose and
212
mannopentaose were obtained in experiment A, whereas mannotriose and manohexaose
213
were significantly higher in experiment C.
214
After 30 minutes of hydrolysis, experiment A showed the highest MOS content
215
with statistical significance (p < 0.05), followed by experiments B and D, with no
216
significant differences among the two of them. Finally, experiment C showed significantly
217
lower (p < 0.05) amounts than the other three experiments. This makes sense since
218
experiment A was carried out at a higher temperature, whereas in experiment C the lowest
219
temperature was used. On the other hand, experiments B and D showed very similar
220
amounts of MOS, probably due to the very close working temperature. Individually, each
221
sugar followed the tendency described above. Finally, at 60 minutes experiment A
222
decreased in all six sugars, probably due to a thermal degradation related with the high
223
temperatures applied; experiment B had significantly higher values than the other three
224
experiments, whereas experiment C had significantly lower values. Individually, each sugar
225
followed the tendency described above.
226
As a result of these trends, the overall highest amounts of individual and total
227
MOS were obtained after 60 minutes in experiment B, as at this point MOS concentrations
228
reached values beyond those that had been obtained at 30 minutes in experiment A.
229 230
Microbial composition
231
As the objective of this project was to study the possible use of spent coffee
232
grounds rich in MOS (after hydrolysis) as potential prebiotic, an initial in vitro fermentation
233
of a pure MOS mix before starting with spent coffee grounds hydrolysis was performed.
234
Accordingly, 30 mg of MOS/mL (5 mg/mL of each compound) were fermented. Significant 11 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
235
stimulation in the growth of some genera, in comparison with basal situation of the
236
microbial community, were found. Therefore, Bifidobacterium, Barnesiella, Anaerostipes,
237
Blautia, Clostridium XVIb, Coprococcus, Butyricicoccus, Intestinimonas, Ruminococcus
238
and Bilophila showed significantly higher abundances when MOS where used (Figure
239
S2A).
240
Once the prebiotic effect of pure MOS could have on some bacteria was
241
confirmed, and since MOS have been described as prebiotic compounds, the next step was
242
to unravel whether higher amounts of MOS would lead to a more beneficial microbial
243
community structure. For this purpose, the samples corresponding to 30 minutes were used
244
for several reasons: a) after 10 minutes the temperature was not stable and thus, MOS
245
production was very variable. In this sense, MOS production was not sufficiently different
246
among studies as to be able to make comparisons and therefore to establish clear links to
247
certain microorganisms. b) After 60 minutes, experiment A suffered a decrease in
248
oligosaccharide content (probably due to a thermal degradation) which would yield new
249
compounds with potential effect on microbial growth, making this experiment useless for
250
comparisons. c) Related to the previous reason, during carbohydrate heating there is a
251
production of furanic compounds (such as HMF and furfural) from non-enzymatic
252
browning.28 In this sense, we observed an increase in the levels of furanic compounds with
253
hydrolysis time and temperature (HMF and furfural, Table 2), which have been reported to
254
inhibit some bacterial growth.33 Therefore we decided to avoid samples obtained after 60
255
minutes due to the excessive accumulation of furanic compounds; in fact, we detected that
256
some bacteria stopped growing or even decreased in abundance after 30 minutes (described
257
in section 3.2.1.). In addition, comparisons were made between experiments and not
12 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 12 of 37
Page 13 of 37
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
258
between samples from the same experiment, using only the sample obtained after 30
259
minutes of hydrolysis.
260
At phylum level, nearly 100% of the bacterial populations belonged to the phyla
261
Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes or Proteobacteria. Experiment A (with the
262
highest MOS content) had a significant (p < 0.05) enrichment in phylum Firmicutes
263
compared with the other three experiments. Moreover, Bacteroidetes showed a tendency to
264
become more abundant in experiments with higher amounts of MOS. In addition,
265
Bacteroidetes abundance was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in experiments A, B and D
266
compared with experiment C (the one with the lowest amounts of MOS). These results are
267
in accordance with previously published literature stating that fiber-rich diets increase
268
Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes phyla.34 The same authors described that an increase in
269
Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes is accompanied by a decrease in Proteobacteria. Our results
270
also show how Proteobacteria abundance is significantly higher (p < 0.05) in the
271
experiment with the lowest amounts of MOS (Figure 1A). On the other hand, no
272
significant differences in the Firmicutes:Bacteroidetes ratio were observed.
273
The observed increase in Firmicutes could be explained by the higher abundance
274
of some specific genera: Clostridium XIVb, Coprococcus, Butyricicoccus, Intestinimonas,
275
Pseudoflavonifractor and Veillonella. In addition, statistically significant differences
276
related with MOS content were found in the Bacteroidetes genera Barnesiella and
277
Odoribacter and in the Proteobacteria ud-Burkholderiales and Bilophila. Experiment A
278
(with the highest MOS levels) showed significantly higher (p < 0.05) abundances of the
279
above mentioned taxa than the other three experiments. On the other hand, experiment C
280
(with the lowest MOS amounts) generally showed significantly lower abundances of such
281
bacteria than the other experiments (Figure 1B). These results indicate that a higher supply 13 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
282
of MOS translates into a higher abundance of these bacteria. Moreover, these assumptions
283
are supported by significantly positive correlations between each bacterial abundance and
284
every MOS analyzed (Figure 2). Except for Bilophila, all of the bacterial taxa associated
285
with MOS have been linked mainly to positive effects on health, summarized in Table 3.
286
According to these results, MOS could have a prebiotic effect over gut microbial
287
communities, promoting a healthier microbial structure.
288
The analysis of microbial -diversity in terms of the Shannon and Simpson
289
diversity indexes was also performed. In experiment A, the Shannon diversity index was
290
significantly higher than in the other experiments. Moreover, the Simpson diversity index
291
followed the same behavior, being significantly higher in A than in the other three
292
experiments (where no significant differences were found). These results are in accordance
293
with published literature about the effect of fiber-rich diets on the increase of gut microbial
294
diversity.34 Additionally, statistically significant correlations between Shannon diversity
295
index and mannose, mannobiose, mannotriose, mannopentaose, mannohexaose, and total
296
MOS were found (Figure 2). Finally, the Simpson diversity index was also positively
297
correlated with mannose, mannobiose, mannopentaose and total MOS (Figure 2).
298
According to these results, we observed that a higher MOS concentration led to a richer
299
microbial community in terms of diversity.
300 301
Microbial growth inhibitors
302
The appearance of inhibitors of microbial growth during biotransformation
303
processes is a main issue that has been widely reported.33 Such potential inhibitors include
304
furanic compounds (like HMF and furfural) and some polyphenols. HMF and furfural are
14 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 14 of 37
Page 15 of 37
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
305
metabolites produced during non-enzymatic browning and therefore are already present in
306
roasted coffee beans35 and spent coffee grounds.36 The inhibition caused by furanic
307
compounds has been widely reported, mostly in relation to the fermentation of
308
lignocellulosic residues.33 In the case of polyphenols, it is widely known that they are
309
strong antioxidants and therefore play a protective role in health. Some polyphenols, mostly
310
complex ones such as flavonoids, chlorogenic acids, tannins, ellagitannins, etc., can be
311
metabolized by some gut microbial communities, yielding simpler phenolics. These
312
metabolites can be absorbed and exert a beneficial effect either systemically or locally in
313
the colon.37 However, some other polyphenols have also been described as possible growth
314
inhibitors for some microorganisms.33,38 In this sense, it has been reported that ferulic acid
315
and quercetin can inhibit or reduce the growth of some fiber degrading bacterial
316
communities in rats, leading to a lower SCFA production and an increased excretion of
317
oligosaccharides in feces.39
318
One of the objectives of the project was to study the potential use of hydrolyzed
319
spent coffee ground extracts without further purification, since they still have some
320
beneficial compounds, such as polyphenols. However, it was hypothesized that along
321
hydrolysis (due to high temperatures) some Maillard compounds (such as HMF and
322
furfural) would appear. Therefore, the possible inhibitory effect of HMF and furfural on
323
microbial growth we tested, by in vitro fermentation of a MOS mixture with and without
324
addition of HMF-furfural mix at two concentrations (10 and 1 mg/mL). Growth inhibition
325
of Barnesiella, Coprobacter, Butyricimonas, Odoribacter, Anaerostipes, Blautia,
326
Clostridium XVIb, Ruminococcus, Clostridium IV, Rumiococcus2, Flavonifractor,
327
Intestinimonas, Oscillibacter, Clostridium XVIII and Bilophila (Figure S2B) were observed
15 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
328
under this in vitro fermentation conditions. Therefore, the inhibitory activity of HMF and
329
furfural was demonstrated.
330
The analysis of bacterial communities showed that the relative abundances of
331
some genera were lower in the fermentations employing coffee grounds hydrolyzed for
332
longer than 30 minutes (Figure 3). These bacteria included some SCFA producers
333
Collinsella, Ruminococcus and Blautia (acetate producers), Blautia and Dialister
334
(propionate producers), and Anaerostipes, Faecalibacterium, and Butyricimonas (butyrate
335
producers).16 In view of this pattern, it could be hypothesized that some microbial inhibitors
336
that accumulate during hydrolysis, such as furanic compounds and/or polyphenols, can
337
negatively affect such microbial genera. The relative abundance of several of these taxa had
338
increased with coffee grounds hydrolysed for 30 minutes in comparison to those
339
hydrolysed for 10, whereas the relative abundance of Faecalibacterium, Ruminococcus and
340
Blautia already decreased with coffee grounds hydrolysed for 30 minutes, suggesting a
341
more harmful effect of such inhibitors towards them. However, in experiment C, the
342
relative abundance of these three genera increased between 10 minutes and 30 minutes of
343
coffee grounds hydrolysis. This could be related with the lower HMF and furfural values
344
found in experiment C.
345
Taking all this information into account, the analysis of HMF and furfural
346
concentrations in the samples collected after 10, 30 and 60 minutes of hydrolysis was
347
performed. As expected, HMF and furfural concentrations increased with hydrolysis time
348
due to longer exposure to high temperature (Table 2). HMF and furfural production also
349
depend on the temperature applied, and thus, in those experiments in which the applied
350
temperature was higher, HMF and furfural concentrations were also higher. We found
351
statistically significant negative correlations (p < 0.05) between HMF and furfural and 16 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 16 of 37
Page 17 of 37
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
352
Blautia, Dialister, Faecalibacterium, Ruminococcus, Butyricimonas, and Anaerostipes
353
(Figure 2). Correlation coefficients ranged from -0.3325 (in the case of Ruminococcus) to
354
-0.8312 (for Butyricimonas). Therefore, HMF and furfural seem to inhibit or decrease the
355
growth of these microorganisms, and accordingly reduce the prebiotic effect of MOS.
356
The levels of total polyphenols in the samples collected after 10, 30 and 60
357
minutes of hydrolysis were also analyzed. Experiment A showed, in average, lower
358
amounts of polyphenols than the other three experiments. This could be related with the
359
higher hydrolysis temperature, which could degrade some polyphenols. Experiments B, C
360
and D showed similar polyphenol content in average, with no significant differences (Table
361
2). However, polyphenol content increased along hydrolysis time, which could be related
362
with the constant release of polyphenols as the degree of hydrolysis of the spent coffee
363
grounds increases. As previously stated, polyphenols could also act as microbial inhibitors.
364
In this sense, statistically significant negative correlations (p < 0.05) for Blautia,
365
Faecalibacterium, Ruminococcus and Collinsella (Figure 2) were found. Correlation
366
coefficients ranged from -0.3228 (for Collinsella) to -0.7334 (for Faecalibacterium). In this
367
sense, polyphenols released by spent coffee grounds could reduce the growth of some gut
368
bacteria and therefore reduce fiber degradation and SCFA production. Blautia,
369
Faecalibacterium and Ruminococcus showed significant negative correlations with HMF,
370
furfural and total polyphenols. This could mean that these bacteria are negatively affected
371
by both kinds of inhibitors. Accordingly, as depicted in Figure 3, these bacteria seem to be
372
more aggressively affected and their abundances already start decreasing with coffee
373
grounds hydrolyzed for 30 minutes.
374 375
Short chain fatty acids production 17 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
376
Several health effects are attributed to SCFAs. Decreasing the luminal pH is one of
377
the most obvious, which can counter the growth of pathogenic bacteria. On the other hand,
378
butyrate is used as substrate by the epithelial cells, being important for their functionality
379
and, overall, the three main SCFAs (acetate, propionate and butyrate) are important for the
380
maintenance of the gut barrier.
381
colonocytes, acetate and propionate are mostly absorbed and incorporated to different
382
metabolic routes related to energy balance. Thus, these SCFAs have a protective role in
383
diet-induced obesity.40 On the other hand, butyrate and propionate have been related to the
384
production of gut hormones and therefore in reducing food intake.40 Moreover, it is thought
385
that SCFAs could have an important role in colorectal cancer protection (mostly butyrate)
386
by increasing motility, irrigation, reducing inflammation and increasing apoptosis. In fact,
387
it has been suggested that the protective effect of dietary fiber over colorectal cancer
388
depends upon the production of butyrate.41 Propionate along with butyrate has also been
389
associated with regulation of intestinal inflammation through induction of T-regulatory cell
390
differentiation.24
24
Moreover, while butyric acid is mostly metabolized by
391
SCFAs production is summarized in Table 2. SCFA production showed a similar
392
pattern across experiments as, generally, higher amounts of MOS led to higher SCFAs
393
production though for 60 minutes of coffee grounds hydrolysis the levels of SCFAs
394
decreased (Table 2). In experiment A this makes sense since MOS production was lower at
395
60 minutes. However, this was found even in experiments were MOS production increased
396
until the end. The decrease in SCFAs production with coffee grounds that have undergone
397
more than 30 minutes of hydrolysis could be attributed to the inhibitory effect exerted by
398
HMF, furfural and/or polyphenols. As described in section 3.2.1, some SCFAs producers
399
are inversely correlated with HMF, furfural and polyphenol concentrations, which could 18 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 18 of 37
Page 19 of 37
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
400
mean that they are negatively affected by those substances. As a consequence, SCFAs
401
production is reduced. Moreover, supporting these findings, SCFAs producers
402
Anaerostipes, Collinsella, Coprococcus, Faecalibacterium, Bididobacterium, Veillonella,
403
Dialister, Butyricimonas, Butyricicoccus and Intestinimonas correlated positively with the
404
corresponding SCFAs (Figure 2). Therefore, this could explain, at least in part, SCFAs
405
production.
406
When comparing experiments, a higher MOS production usually translated into a
407
higher SCFAs production (Table 2). Mean acetate values over the three measured time
408
points ranged from 75.05 mol/g of spent coffee grounds for experiment A to 130.79 mol/
409
g for experiment D. Experiment A showed significantly lower production of acetate (p