Spin Dimer Analysis of the Spin Exchange Interactions in

Report from the third workshop on future directions of solid-state chemistry: The ... Abdou Lachgar , Susan E. Latturner , Raymond , E. Schaak , Dong-...
1 downloads 0 Views 128KB Size
Download PDF
Inorg. Chem. 2002, 41, 3570−3577

Spin Dimer Analysis of the Spin Exchange Interactions in Paramelaconite Cu4O3 and Its Analogue Ag2Cu2O3 and the Spin Ordering of the Cu2O3 Spin Lattice Leading to Their Magnetic Phase Transitions M.-H. Whangbo* and H.-J. Koo Department of Chemistry, North Carolina State UniVersity, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695-8204 Received February 19, 2002

The magnetic structures of the Cu2O3 spin lattices present in Cu4O3 and Ag2Cu2O3 were analyzed by studying their spin exchange interactions on the basis of spin dimer analysis. Calculations of spin exchange parameters were calibrated by studying LiCuVO4 whose intrachain and interchain antiferromagnetic spin exchange parameters are known experimentally. The magnetic phase transition of Cu4O3 at 42.3 K doubles the unit cell along each crystallographic direction. The spin arrangements of the Cu2O3 lattice consistent with this experimental observation are different from conventional antiferromagnetic ordering. Our analysis indicates that spin fluctuation should occur in Cu4O3, low-dimensional magnetism should be more important than magnetic frustration in Cu4O3, and Ag2Cu2O3 and Cu4O3 should have similar structural and magnetic properties.

1. Introduction Paramelaconite Cu4O31 is a mineral that shows puzzling magnetic properties.2 The Cu2O3 lattice of spin-1/2 Cu2+ ions results from Cu4O3 when the diamagnetic Cu+ ions are removed (Figure 1). A neutron diffraction study2 reveals that Cu4O3 undergoes a magnetic phase transition below 42.3 K leading to a supercell (2a, 2b, 2c); namely, the phase transition doubles the unit cell along each crystallographic direction.2 The intensity of a magnetic reflection was reported to show a temperature dependence that can be interpreted in terms of either low-dimensional magnetism or magnetic frustration.2 The crystal structure1 and the magnetic properties2 of Cu4O3 have been studied using single-crystal mineral samples.3 So far, it is unknown how to synthesize homogeneous samples of Cu4O3, although extraction of copper or its oxides with concentrated aqueous ammonia was found * To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected]. (1) O’Keeffe, M.; Bovin, J.-O. Am. Mineral. 1978, 63, 180. (2) Pinsard-Gaudart, J.; Rodriguez-Carvajal, J.; Gukasov, A.; Monod, P.; Dechamps, M.; Jegoudez, J. Proprie´te´s magne´tiques de Cu4O3-Un reseau pyrochlore a` spin 1/2. Presented at Colloque Oxydes a` Proprie´te´s Remarquables: Ordre de spins, ordre de charges et phe´nome`nes coope´ratifs; Berthier, C., Collin, G., Doumerc, J.-P., organizers; Bombannes, June 6-8, 2001. The abstracts of the meeting are collected in the report GDR 2069. (3) Smithsonian 112878; Smithsonian Institution: Washington, DC.

3570 Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 41, No. 13, 2002

to produce a mixture of Cu4O3, Cu2O, and CuO.4 Mineral samples of Cu4O3 contain CuO and other unknown magnetic impurities,2 so a quantitative analysis of the magnetic susceptibility of Cu4O3 is complicated. Nevertheless, the magnetic susceptibility shows a maximum around 75 K and a sharp decrease below 42.3 K,2 which suggest an antiferromagnetic phase transition. Ag2Cu2O3 is isostructural and isoelectronic with Cu4O3.5-7 The structure of Ag2Cu2O3 results when the Cu+ ions of Cu4O3 are replaced with Ag+ ions; that is, Ag2Cu2O3 has the same Cu2O3 spin lattice as found for Cu4O3. The magnetic susceptibility of Ag2Cu2O3 shows a broad maximum at ∼80 K6,7 and a sharp decrease below 60 K,6 which again suggest an antiferromagnetic phase transition. So far, no study has been reported concerning the magnetic structure of Ag2Cu2O3 below 60 K. There are several important questions concerning the magnetic structures of Cu4O3 and Ag2Cu2O3. It should be noted that each CuO2 ribbon chain has two spin-1/2 Cu2+ ions per unit cell (Figure 1b) so that an antiferromagnetic (4) Morgan, P. E. D.; Partin, D. E.; Chamberland, B. L.; O’Keeffe, M. J. Solid State Chem. 1996, 121, 33. (5) Go´mez-Romero, P.; Tejada-Rosales, E. M.; Palacı´n, M. R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 524. (6) Adelsberger, K.; Curda, J.; Vensky, S.; Jansen, M. J. Solid State Chem. 2001, 158, 82. (7) Tejada-Rosales, E. M.; Rodriguez-Carvajal, J.; Palacin, M. R.; Go´mezRomero, P. Mater. Sci. Forum 2001, 378-381, 606.

10.1021/ic020141x CCC: $22.00

© 2002 American Chemical Society Published on Web 06/01/2002

Magnetic Interactions in Cu4O3 and Ag2Cu2O3

In the present work, we probe these questions by analyzing the spin exchange interactions of the Cu2O3 lattices in Ag2Cu2O3 and Cu4O3 on the basis of spin dimer analysis. Our work is organized as follows: The essence of spin dimer analysis is briefly described in Section 2. The Cu2O3 lattices of Cu4O3 and Ag2Cu2O3 are examined in Section 3 to identify their spin dimers (i.e., structural units containing two adjacent spin sites). In Section 4, we discuss how to calibrate our calculations of spin exchange parameters. In Section 5, we probe the spin ordering of Cu4O3 leading to its magnetic phase transition and its implications concerning low-dimensional magnetism and magnetic frustration. We then compare the spin exchange interactions of Cu4O3 and Ag2Cu2O3. Important results of our work are summarized in Section 6. 2. Spin Dimer Analysis

Figure 1. (a) Perspective view of the crystal structure of Cu4O3. (b) Perspective view of the Cu2O3 spin lattice of Cu4O3.

ordering such as (vV)∞ along each chain does not double the unit cell along the a- and b-direction. There are four layers of CuO2 ribbon chains in a unit cell of the Cu2O3 lattice (Figure 1b). Thus, an antiferromagnetic ordering such as (vVvV)∞ in the successive layers of CuO2 ribbon chains does not double the unit cell along the c-direction. It is quite challenging to find what kind of spin ordering takes place in the Cu2O3 lattice of Cu4O3 below 42.3 K to double the unit cell along each crystallographic direction and see if the magnetic phase transition associated with such a spin ordering can be considered as an antiferromagnetic phase transition. So far, it has not been studied whether the spin exchange interactions of the Cu2O3 lattice support the suggestion2 that low-dimensional magnetism or magnetic frustration is responsible for the observed temperature dependence of a magnetic reflection intensity in Cu4O3, and whether there exists an alternative explanation for this experimental observation. It is important to investigate if the answers to these questions are equally applicable to Ag2Cu2O3.

Theoretically, physical properties of a magnetic solid are described in terms of a spin-Hamiltonian. This phenomenological Hamiltonian is expressed as a sum of pairwise spin exchange interactions. In terms of first-principles electronic structure calculations, the strengths of spin exchange interactions (i.e., spin exchange parameters J) can be calculated in two ways: (a) electronic structure calculations for the highand low-spin states of spin dimers (i.e., structural units consisting of two spin sites)8-10 and (b) electronic band structure calculations for various ordered spin arrangements of a magnetic solid.11 For magnetic solids with large and complex unit cell structures, these quantitative methods become difficult to apply. In understanding physical properties of magnetic solids, however, it is often sufficient to estimate the relative magnitudes of their J values.12-18 In general, a spin exchange parameter J can be written as J ) JF + JAF, where the ferromagnetic term JF (>0) is small so that the spin exchange becomes ferromagnetic (i.e., J > 0) when the antiferromagnetic term JAF ( ζ′). The diffuse STO provides an orbital tail that enhances overlap between O atoms in the short O‚‚‚O contacts of the Cu-O‚‚‚O-Cu super-superexchange paths as well as that between the Cu 3d and O 2p orbitals of the Cu-O-Cu superexchange paths. The ∆e values are affected most sensitively by the exponent ζ′ of the diffuse STO of the O 2p orbital. To determine the appropriate ζ′ value, it is necessary to carry out spin dimer analysis for a magnetic solid that has spin dimers similar to those found in Cu4O3 and whose antiferromagnetic spin exchange parameters are known experimentally. The magnetic solid LiCuVO426-29 has spin-1/2 Cu2+ ions as the only magnetic ions and consists of isolated CuO4 (25) Clementi, E.; Roetti, C. At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 1974, 14, 177. (26) Lafontaine, M. A.; Leblanc, M.; Frey, G. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. C 1989, 45, 1205. (27) Kanno, R.; Kawamoto, Y.; Takeda, Y.; Hasegawa, M.; Yamamoto, O.; Kinimura, N. J. Solid State Chem. 1992, 96, 397. (28) Vasil’ev, A. N. JETP Lett. 1999, 69, 876.

Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 41, No. 13, 2002

3573

Whangbo and Koo

Figure 5. Arrangement of two adjacent CuO2 ribbon chains present in every layer of CuO2 ribbon chains in the magnetic solid LiCuVO4.

octahedral chains aligned along the crystallographic bdirection.26,27 Each CuO4 octahedral chain is made up of edge-sharing CuO6 octahedra, and every CuO6 octahedron is axially elongated with the axial Cu-O bonds perpendicular to the chain direction. Thus, the magnetic orbital of each CuO6 octahedron is contained in the equatorial CuO4 square plane, and such CuO4 square planes form a CuO2 ribbon chain. Thus, the spin lattice (i.e., the lattice containing magnetic orbitals) of LiCuVO4 consists of layers of CuO2 ribbon chains26,27 as depicted in Figure 5, where the CuO2 ribbons are contained in the plane of the layer. Consequently, there occur three spin exchange interactions of interest, that is, the intrachain NN interaction (J1), the intrachain NNN interaction (J2), and the interchain NN interaction (J3). As far as their spin dimers are concerned, the interchain NN and the intrachain NNN interactions are similar in nature because both have two Cu-O‚‚‚O-Cu super-superexchange paths contained in the plane of their magnetic orbitals (e.g., Figure 3c). It is known experimentally28,29 that J1 and J3 are antiferromagnetic with values J1/kB ) -22.5 K and J3/kB ) -1.3 K. To determine the ζ′ value of χ2p(r) that reproduces the experimental J3/J1 ratio found for LiCuVO4, we examine how the ∆e values for the J1, J2, and J3 interactions change when the ζ′ value is gradually increased as ζ′(x) ) 1.659(1 + x) (see Table 2), that is, as the diffuseness of the O 2p orbital tail is gradually decreased (x g 0). Figure 6 shows that the intrachain NN interaction increases gradually with increasing x whereas both the interchain NN and the intrachain NNN interactions exhibit the opposite trend. The calculated (∆e3/ ∆e1)2 ratio becomes close to the experimental J3/J1 ratio when x ) 0.125, for which ∆e1 ) 58 meV, ∆e2 ) 25 meV, and ∆e3 ) 17 meV. From the equation J1 ) -(∆e1)2/Ueff with ∆e1 ) 58 meV and J1 ) -22.5 K, we obtain Ueff ) 1.74 eV. Then, the J2 and J3 values are calculated to be -4.2 and -1.9 K, respectively, from the expression Ji ) -(∆ei)2/Ueff (i ) 2, 3) with ∆e2 ) 25 meV and ∆e3 ) 17 meV. (29) Vasil’ev, A. N.; Ponomarenko, L. A.; Manaka, H.; Yamada, I.; Isobe, M.; Ueda, Y. Physica B 2000, 284-286, 1619.

3574 Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 41, No. 13, 2002

Figure 6. ∆e values calculated for the intrachain NN, interchain NN, and intrachain NNN interactions in LiCuVO4 as a function of the exponent ζ′(x) ) 1.659(1 + x) of the diffuse STO in the DZ STO representation for the O 2p orbital.

It is noted that the calculated J2/J1 ratio (i.e., 0.19) for LiCuVO4 is smaller than the critical value Rc (i.e., 0.241) found for a spin-1/2 Heisenberg chain with both NN and NNN antiferromagnetic interactions.30,31 The ground state of such a chain is the spin liquid state characterized by no energy gap between the ground and the first excited states (as in the case of a spin-1/2 Heisenberg chain with only NN antiferromagnetic interactions) when J2/J1 < Rc, but it is the dimer state characterized by nonzero energy gap between the ground and the first excited states when J2/J1 > Rc.30,31 Thus, the fact that the calculated J2/J1 ratio is smaller than Rc is consistent with the experimental finding that the CuO2 ribbon chains of LiCuVO4 undergo an antiferromagnetic ordering.28,29 As described previously, the use of ζ′(x) provides a satisfactory and consistent description of the spin exchange interactions of LiCuVO4 when x ) 0.125. Thus, we employ the ζ′(x ) 0.125) value for the estimation of the spin exchange parameters for the intrachain NN (Ja), the intrachain NNN (Jb), and the interchain NN (Jc) interactions of the Cu2O3 lattices in Cu4O3 and Ag2Cu2O3. Our results are summarized in Table 3, where the J values were calculated using the expression J ) -(∆e)2/Ueff with the value of Ueff ) 1.74 eV deduced for the magnetic lattice of LiCuVO4. 5. Spin Ordering in the Cu2O3 Lattice Leading to Magnetic Phase Transition 5.1. Cu4O3. Table 3 reveals that the interchain NN interaction is more strongly antiferromagnetic than the intrachain NN interaction (i.e., |Jc| > |Ja|). This finding is explained by the fact that the Cu-O-Cu superexchange path has a significantly larger ∠Cu-O-Cu angle in the interchain (30) Okamoto, K.; Nomura, K. Phys. Lett. A 1992, 169, 433. (31) Tonegawa, T.; Harada, I. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 1987, 56, 2153.

Magnetic Interactions in Cu4O3 and Ag2Cu2O3 Table 3. ∆E and J Values Calculated for the Intrachain NN, Interchain NN, and Intrachain NNN Interactions of the Cu2O3 Lattices in Cu4O3 and Ag2Cu2O3a Cu4O3b

Ag2Cu2O3c

interaction

e (meV)

J (K)

∆e (meV)

J (K)

intrachain NN (Ja) intrachain NNN (Jb) interchain NN (Jc)

51 24 85

-17.4 -3.9 -48.3

42 22 91

-11.8 -3.2 -55.4

a The J values were calculated using the expression J ) -(∆e)2/U eff with Ueff ) 1.74 eV. b Calculated using the crystal structure of ref 1. c Calculated using the crystal structure of ref 6.

Figure 7. Three spin arrangements around a shared O(2) atom between adjacent CuO2 ribbon chains: (a) vv/VV, (b) vV/vV, and (c) vV/Vv. Filled and empty circles represent the Cu2+ ions with up- and down-spins, respectively.

Figure 8. Two periodic spin arrangements in a CuO2 ribbon chain: (a) (vV)∞ and (b) (vvVV)∞. Filled and empty circles represent the Cu2+ ions with up- and down-spins, respectively.

than in the intrachain NN interaction (Table 1). Table 3 also shows that the intrachain NN interaction is more strongly antiferromagnetic than the intrachain NNN interaction (i.e., |Ja| > |Jb|). Thus, the ordering of the spins in the Cu2O3 lattice of Cu4O3 should be determined primarily by the interchain NN interactions and then by the intrachain NN interactions. Each O(2) atom is the common bridging point of four interchain Cu-O-Cu superexchange paths (Figure 1b). Figure 7 depicts three arrangements of the four Cu2+ spins surrounding a single O(2) atom, that is, vv/VV, vV/vV and vV/Vv. Because |Jc| is larger than |Ja|, the vv/VV arrangement is more stable than the vV/vV and vV/Vv arrangements. The latter two arrangements are equal in stability. Other possible interchain spin arrangements around O(2) (e.g., vv/vV and vv/ vv) are less stable than those shown in Figure 7. Two periodic spin arrangements of a CuO2 ribbon chain, that is, (vV)∞ and (vvVV)∞, are shown in Figure 8. For a spin-1/2 Heisenberg chain with both NN and NNN antiferromagnetic interactions,30,31 the spin arrangement (vvVV)∞ does not represent the ground state of the chain, regardless of whether the Jb/Ja ratio is smaller or larger than the critical value Rc. When Ja and Jb are both antiferromagnetic and Jb/Ja < 1, the (vV)∞ arrange-

Figure 9. (a) Most favorable interchain spin arrangement between adjacent layers of CuO2 ribbon chains, leading to a vv/VV-double-layer. (b, c) Two equivalent interchain spin arrangements that can be used for the stacking between two vv/VV-double-layers. Filled and empty circles represent the Cu2+ ions with up- and down-spins, respectively.

ment is more stable than the (vvVV)∞ arrangement. The most energetically favorable arrangement between two adjacent layers of CuO2 ribbon chains is shown in Figure 9a, where every shared O(2) atom between the two layers has the interchain spin arrangement vv/VV. This forces each CuO2 ribbon chain to adopt the (vvVV)∞ spin arrangement and hence doubles the unit cell along the two chain directions, that is, the a- and b-directions. To consider the spin ordering along the c-direction, we recall that the O(1) and O(2) atom alternations on the two edges of a CuO2 ribbon chain have opposite senses (Figure 1b). Suppose that we add a layer of CuO2 ribbon chains to a “vv/VV-double-layer” in which each shared O(2) atom has the interchain vv/VV arrangement (e.g., that shown in Figure 9a). Then, the new set of shared O(2) atoms generated by the additional layer can adopt either the spin arrangement in Figure 9b or that in Figure 9c, because the two interchain spin arrangements vV/vV and vV/Vv available for the O(2) atoms are the same in energy. It is convenient to describe the spin ordering of the Cu2O3 lattice along the c-direction in terms of stacking vv/VV-double-layers. Because the stacking between two vv/VV-double-layers can achieved by adopting the vV/vV or vV/Vv spin arrangement between them, the stacking of two vv/ VV-double-layers can lead to the “RR” arrangement shown in Figure 10a or the “Rβ” arrangement shown in Figure 10b. The stacking of vv/VV-double-layers can give rise to a large number of repeat patterns. The patterns such as (RR)∞ and (Rβ)∞ do not double the unit cell along the c-direction, while the patterns such as (RβRR)∞, (RRβR)∞, (RRRβ)∞, (RββR)∞, and (RRββ)∞ do. As an example, Figure 11 depicts the repeat pattern (RββR)∞. In principle, the unit cell along the c-direction can be increased by a factor of any integer n g Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 41, No. 13, 2002

3575

Whangbo and Koo

Figure 10. Two possible stacking arrangements between two vv/VV-doublelayers: (a) RR and (b) Rβ. Filled and empty circles represent the Cu2+ ions with up- and down-spins, respectively.

Figure 11. Stacking arrangement (RββR)∞ in the Cu2O3 lattice that doubles the unit cell along the a-, b-, and c-directions. Filled and empty circles represent the Cu2+ ions with up- and down-spins, respectively. Each rectangular box represents a unit cell in the absence of the magnetic phase transition.

2. The experimental observation of the c-axis doubling is explained by noting that the spin orderings such as (RββR)∞, (RRββ)∞, (βRRβ)∞, and (ββRR)∞ are statistically the most probable arrangements, given the fact that the spin arrangements vV/vV and vV/Vv are equally valid for the stacking between vv/VV-double-layers.

3576 Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 41, No. 13, 2002

This discussion of spin ordering along the c-direction leads to two important implications. First, the freedom of choice between the vV/vV and vV/Vv arrangements for the stacking between vv/VV-double-layers should give rise to spin fluctuation in the Cu2O3 spin lattice, and the extent of this spin fluctuation should depend on temperature. Second, the ordered spin arrangements of the Cu2O3 lattice that explain the observed superlattice formation differ from conventional antiferromagnetic ordering. As already pointed out, the (vvVV)∞ spin ordering is not the most stable arrangement of an isolated CuO2 ribbon chain. Thus, the interlayer vv/VV spin ordering around each O(2) atom, which induces the (vvVV)∞ spin ordering in the associated ribbon chains, would prevent the chains from adopting their most stable spin states. Namely, the interchain spin ordering frustrates the intrachain spin ordering, and vice versa. The extent of this magnetic frustration would be strongly enhanced if the Ja/Jc value were increased toward 1. If the Ja/Jc value were reduced toward 0, the magnetic structure of the Cu2O3 lattice would be dominated by the interchain spin ordering along the c-direction, thereby inducing a onedimensional magnetic character. The calculated Ja/Jc value (i.e., 0.36) is closer to the limit of one-dimensional magnetism than to that of magnetic frustration, so that lowdimensional magnetic character would be more important than magnetic frustration in Cu4O3. 5.2. Ag2Cu2O3. Table 3 reveals that the spin exchange parameters J calculated for Ag2Cu2O3 are very similar to those calculated for Cu4O3, that is, |Jc| > |Ja| > |Jb|. Thus, it is expected that the magnetic phase transition of Ag2Cu2O3 at 60 K should double the unit cell along each crystallographic direction, the Cu2O3 lattice of Ag2Cu2O3 should exhibit spin fluctuation, and low-dimensional magnetic character would be more important than magnetic frustration for Ag2Cu2O3. Nevertheless, Ag2Cu2O3 and Cu4O3 should show subtle differences because their Ja/Jc and Jb/Ja values are different. The |Jc| value is slightly larger for Ag2Cu2O3 than for Cu4O3, because the interchain Cu-O-Cu superexchange path has a slightly larger ∠Cu-O-Cu angle in Ag2Cu2O3. The |Ja| value is smaller for Ag2Cu2O3 than for Cu4O3, because the two Cu-O-Cu intrachain superexchange paths are considerably more asymmetric in Ag2Cu2O3. Consequently, Ag2Cu2O3 has a smaller Ja/Jc value than does Cu4O3 (0.21 vs 0.36) so that Ag2Cu2O3 should be more strongly affected by low-dimensional magnetic character than is Cu4O3. Another small difference between Ag2Cu2O3 and Cu4O3 is that Jb/Ja > Rc for Ag2Cu2O3 while Jb/Ja < Rc for Cu4O3 (i.e., 0.27 vs 0.22). 6. Concluding Remarks In the Cu2O3 spin lattice of Cu4O3, the most favorable spin arrangement between adjacent layers of CuO2 ribbon chains is vv/VV, which forces the CuO2 ribbon chains to adopt the (vvVV)∞ spin arrangement, hence doubling the unit cell along the a- and b-directions. The spin ordering along the cdirection is determined by the stacking of such vv/VV-doublelayers. The ordered spin arrangements in the Cu2O3 lattice

Magnetic Interactions in Cu4O3 and Ag2Cu2O3

consistent with the observed superlattice formation are statistically the most probable arrangements, and they differ from conventional antiferromagnetic ordering. Because the spin arrangements vV/vV and vV/Vv are equally valid for the stacking between vv/VV-double-layers, there should occur spin fluctuation in the Cu2O3 lattice, the extent of which should depend on temperature. The calculated spin exchange parameters suggest that low-dimensional magnetic character is more important than magnetic frustration in determining the magnetic properties of Cu4O3. It would be interesting to examine spin fluctuation as a possible cause for the observed

temperature dependence of a magnetic reflection intensity.2 The spin exchange interactions of the Cu2O3 spin lattice in Ag2Cu2O3 are very similar to those in Cu4O3. Thus, Ag2Cu2O3 and Cu4O3 should be similar in their structural and magnetic properties. Acknowledgment. The work at North Carolina State University was supported by the Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Materials Sciences, U.S. Department of Energy, under Grant DE-FG02-86ER45259. IC020141X

Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 41, No. 13, 2002

3577