Steroids. CCLXII.1a Spectra and Stereochemistry. XVI.1b A Study of

Alexander D. Cross. J. Am. Chem. Soc. , 1964, 86 (19), ... Donald W. Hughes , Alex D. Bain , Valerie J. Robinson. Magnetic Resonance in Chemistry 1991...
0 downloads 0 Views 750KB Size
401 1

LONG-RANGE 19-PRoTON-6fl-FLUORINE COUPLING

Oct. 5 , 1964

s. A., MEXICO,D. F.,MEXICO] Steroids. CCLXII.la Spectra and Stereochemistry. XV1.l" A Study of the Mechanism of Long-Range 19-Proton-6P-Fluorine Coupling in 6P-Fluorosteroids [CONTRIBUTION FROM

THE

RESEARCH LABORATORIES, SYNTEX,

BY ALEXANDER D. CROSS RECEIVED APRIL27, 1964 Nuclear magnetic resonance ( n , m , r , )spectral data for numerous G~-fluorosteroidsare analyzed. The effects of other substituents in the molecule on the magnitude of the 19-proton-6p-fluorine spin-spin coupling constants are studied in detail. Possible coupling mechanisms are discussed. Data for 6p- and 118-fluorosteroids show that an electronegative substituent on the chain of bonds between the two coupling nuclei raises the value of the associated with other coupling constant. The available data suggest that increases or decreases of JIX+,~BF substituent groups are additive.

Concurrent with the ever-increasing applications of n.m.r. spectroscopy to a broad range of physical and chemical problems there have appeared many reports of long-range spin-spin coupling of nuclei (coupling of nuclei more than three bonds apart). However, until recently, comparatively little attention has been concentrated on the geometrical requirements for longrange coupling through a saturated system of bonds. Strong proton-proton spin-spin coupling through four a-bonds occurs in bicyclo [2.1.1 hexane^^,^ and bicycle [2.2.1]heptanes4 for which the stereochemical relationship of the coupling protons was shown to be a critical factor. Further similar examples have been reported very r e ~ e n t l y . ~Wiberg and his collaborators3 found a great disparity between calculated and observed coupling constants for calculations based on overlap integrals and wave functions, and the assumption that the Fermi contact potential is the most important contributor to long-range spin-spin coupling. In the less studied field of proton-fluorine coupling, Roberts and his school showed that only the gauche fluorine of the difluoro compound I couples with phenyl protons.6 I n an elegant study they demonstrated that

I1 in the difluorinated cyclobutane I1 only t h a t fluorine atom on the same side of the cyclobutane ring as the methyl couples through five u-bonds with the methyl protons.' This conclusion was conditional upon there being no very unusual reversal of the relative magnitudes of the coupling constants of fluorine with the cis and trans protons of adjacent methylene. Almost simultaneous with these disclosures there was observed, independently, long-range spin-spin coupling of steroid angular methyl protons with fluorine substituted a t various sites in the steroid Further studies of this phenomenon revealed t h a t the (1) (a) Steroids. C C L X I : P. Crabbe a n d C. Casas Campillo, manuscript in preparation; (h) Spectra and Stereochemistry. X V : A. D. Cross and P. W , Landis, J . A m . Chem. Soc., 86, 4005 (1964). (2) J. Meinwald and A. Lewis, ibid., 83, 2769 (1961). (3) K. B. Wiberg, B. R . Lowry, and B. J. Nist, ibid., 84, 1596 (1962). (4) F.A. L. Anet, Can. J . Chem., 39,789 (1961); J . Meinwald and Y.C. Meinwald, J . A m . Chcm. Soc., 85, 2514 (1963). ( 5 ) A. Rassat, C. W. Jefford, J. M. Lehn, a n d B. Waegell, Telrahedron L e l l e ~ s 233 , (1964). (6) D. R . Davis, J. P. Lutz, and J. D. Roberts, J. A m . Chem. SOL.,83, 246 (1961). (7) M. Takahashi. D. R. Davis, and J. D. Roberts, ibid., 84, 2935 (1962). (8) G. Slomp, private communication. (9) A. D. Cross and P. W. Landis, J . A m . Chem. Soc., 84, 1736 (1962).

coupling fluorine and proton necessary to maintain a limiting stereochemical relationship for coupling to occur between nuclei separated by five or more u-bonds, and an assessment of this requirement culminated in the formulation of the empirical converging-vector rule.lO.ll A broad survey of extensive n.m.r. studies followed.lh One interpretation of the converging-vector rule would be that transmission of spin-state knowledge between the coupling nuclei occurs through orbital overlap across space. The accumulated e v i d e n ~ e ' ~a, t~ first ~'~ sight appears strongly suggestive of that mechanism. Alternatively, the stereochemical requirements might be indicative of a need to maintain a highly favorable set of bond angles along the chain of bonds connecting the coupling nuclei, to permit transmission of spin-state knowledge through the intervening bonding electrons. To investigate the coupling mechanism a detailed study of readily-available 6/3-fluorosteroids was undertaken. It appeared reasonable to suppose that other substituents, not necessarily present on the interconnecting C19-C10-C&s chain of carbon-carbon bonds, might exercise marked effects upon the magnitude of the coupling constant J ~ ~ H , ~ dependent BF upon the mechanism of the long-range proton-fluorine coupling. I t was anticipated that for a through-space coupling mechanism any structural modification leading to an increase of the 19-proton-6p-fluorine distance, 7 , would be reflected in a decrease in the magnitude of the spinspin coupling constant. Conversely, the effect of substituent groups on a through-bonding-electrons coupling mechanism might be expected to be more related to changes induced in the bond angles, and hence the extent of orbital overlap, along the chain of bonds between the coupling nuclei. Electronegative substituents on the connecting chain, or nearby, would lead t o some rehybridization of orbitals, with concomitant change of bond angles, besides inducing positive charge a t one or more carbons along the chain, For 6-fluorosteroids the converging-vector rule'b, l o predicts 19-H-F coupling for 6p- but not for 6a-fluorosteroids, as is illustrated in part structures I11 and IV. .H Y

+-H 1/

I11

IV

(10) A. D. Cross and P. W. Landis, ibid., 84, 3784 (1962). (11) I t is of distinct interest t h a t the converging vector rule, though so f a r applied only t o steroids, predicts the result which Roberts and coworkers arrived at.

ALEXANDER D. CROSS

4012

Vol. 86

TABLE I CHEMICAL SHIFTS, v , A N D COUPLIXG CONSTANTS, J,~ H , G B FFOR , ANGULAR METHYLPROTON RESONANCES O F 6@-FLUOROSTEROIDS'* Compound

V VI

6p-Fluoropregn-4-ene-3,20-dione

48 1

64 8, 69 3

41'

JHF4 5 77,79' JHF

43 2c 42 5"

VI1

5a-Brorno-6~-fluoro-3P-hydroxy16a-rnethylpregnan-20-one'

39 8

VI11

3P,GP-Difluor0-5a,17a-dihydroxypregnan-20-one17a-acetatec

38 6

IX

6~-Fluoro-3p,5a,170-trihydroxypregnan-20-one 170-acetate"

40 1

X

6~-Fluoro-5a,21-dihydroxypregnane-3,20-dione 3,20-bisethylene ketal"

48 7

XI

6~-Fluoro-3@,5a-dihydroxypregn-16-en-20-one 3@-acetatec

54 3

XI I

acetateh 3p,Gp-Difluoro-17a-hydroxypregn-4-en-20-one

39 4

XI11

6P-Fluoro-5a-hydroxypregnane-3,20-dione 3-ethylene ketal"

38 0

XIV

5a-Brorno-6~-fluoro-3p-hydroxypregnan-20-onec

Xv

6P-Fluoro-5ay,llP.21-trihydroxypregn-li(20)-en-3-one 3-ethylene ketal 21-acetate

XVI

5a-Bromo-6P-fluoro-3p,21-dihydroxvpregnan-2O-one 21-acetate 16a,17a-epoxidec

65 5

XT'II

21-acetate 16a, 170-acetonide" 6P-Fluoro-Yp,5a, 16~,17a,21-pentahydrox~pregnan-20-one

38 4

XTTII

36 0 35 8

xx

5~-Brorno-6P-fluoro-3~,16a,l7a,21-tetrahydroxypregnan-20-one 3-acetate 1 6 a , l i c ~ acetonide' 21-acetate 16a,17a5a-Bromo-6p-fluoro-3p,16aJ ia,21-tetrahydroxypregnan-2O-one acetonidec 5~-Bromo-6~-fluoro-3~,17a,21-trih~droxypregnan-2O-one lia,21-diacetatea

XXI

6p-Fluoro-3p,17a,21-trihydroxypregn-4-en-20-one triacetate"

45 5

38 1

7

2 d

77 7, 79

b

JHF 1 8 72 6, 77 2 JHF 4 6 65 4,69 7 JHF 4 5 67 0, 71 7 JHF 4 7 64 1, 69 3 JHF 5 2 66 3, 70 6 JHF 4 3 70 5, 72 4 JHF 1 9 61 5, 66 5

I E

e

8 1

5

72 1, 76 9 JHF 4 8 69 7, 76 7 JHF

42 9

b

78
filler, and B. Waegell, J Oig. Chem , 28, 780 (1963). (17) Prepared by Dr. L. H. Knox in these laboratories through hydrogenation of 63-fluorotestosterone over palladium-on-charcoal, followed by acetylation. T h e 50-configuration was proved by 0.r.d. (positive Cotton effect curve)

"&

ow

(20) T h e change from a A4-3-keto system ( X X X I I I ) t o a A1.'-3-ketone ( X X X I V ) results in a further flattening of ring A. Models" show t h a t the 113-F-18-H distancela is substantially unaltered and the 11B-F-19-H distance's is slightly smaller (