Subscriber access provided by UNIV OF LOUISIANA
Bioactive Constituents, Metabolites, and Functions
Synergistic inhibitory effects of acacetin and eleven other flavonoids isolated from Artemisia sacrorum on lipid accumulation in 3T3-L1 cells Qianqian Ma, Yunlong Cui, Siyuan Xu, Yiyao Zhao, Haidan Yuan, and Guangchun Piao J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b04683 • Publication Date (Web): 01 Nov 2018 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on November 2, 2018
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 38
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Synergistic inhibitory effects of acacetin and eleven other flavonoids isolated from Artemisia sacrorum on lipid accumulation in 3T3-L1 cells Qianqian Ma,1 Yunlong Cui,1 Siyuan Xu,1Yiyao, Zhao,1 Haidan Yuan,1,2,* and Guangchun Piao 1, 2,*
College of Pharmacy, Yanbian University; Yanji, Jilin,133002, China.
1
Key Laboratory of Natural Resources of Changbai Mountain & Functional
2
Molecules (Yanbian University), Ministry of Education, China. *Corresponding
authors:
Guangchun
Piao,
Tel:
86-433-2436008;
Fax:
86-433-2435026; E-mail:
[email protected]; Haidan Yuan, Tel: 86-433-2435062; Fax: 86-433-2435026; E-mail:
[email protected] 1
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
1 2
ABSTRACT: Artemisia sacrorum Ledeb., a Compositae forage plant in China, has
3
been found to have an inhibitory effect on lipid accumulation. We selected twelve
4
flavonoids, which we had isolated from Artemisia sacrorum and had the potential to
5
inhibit lipid accumulation in the literature or in our preliminary experiments, and
6
grouped them into eleven compound combinations; we investigated their synergistic
7
inhibitory effects on lipid accumulation in 3T3-L1 cells. In screening experiments,
8
Oil-Red O staining, triglyceride levels, and lipid accumulation levels all indicated that
9
combined acacetin and apigenin displayed a significant synergistic inhibitory effect
10
and the best repeatability. Subsequent research showed that this combination could
11
synergistically promote the phosphorylations of AMPK and ACC. Furthermore, to a
12
different extent, that combination had significant synergistic inhibitory effects on
13
various genes or proteins related to adipogenesis and lipogenesis. Thus, that
14
combination could significantly reduce triglyceride levels and lipid accumulation
15
compared with acacetin or apigenin acting alone.
16 17
KEY WORDS: Artemisia sacrorum Ledeb., AMP-activated protein kinase, lipid
18
accumulation, acacetin, apigenin, synergistic effect
19 20 21 22
2
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 2 of 38
Page 3 of 38
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
23
INTRODUCTION
24
Artemisia sacrorum Ledeb. is a semi-shrub herbaceous plant that grows on hillsides
25
and in thickets, forests, and grasslands at middle and low elevations. In plant
26
communities in local areas on sunny mountain slopes, it is often the dominant species
27
or main companion species.1 In the Yili area (Xinjiang, China), the protein and crude
28
fat contents in Compositae forage plants, such as Artemisia sacrorum, are higher than
29
in Gramineae. Use of Compositae forage plants is seasonal, and they are mainly eaten
30
by young animals; the plants are most commonly consumed in early spring, autumn,
31
and winter.2 Furthermore, in the Yanbian area (Jilin, China) and in Korea, Artemisia
32
sacrorum has a long history of folk application for the prevention and treatment of
33
various liver diseases. In recent years, we have demonstrated experimentally that
34
Artemisia sacrorum can inhibit lipid accumulation and adipocyte differentiation by
35
activating AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) in 3T3-L1 cells and HepG2 cells.3-5
36
We are also conducting research into the use of Artemisia sacrorum in treating
37
alcoholic fatty liver (Figure 1).
38
Excessive lipid accumulation is associated with many health problems, such as
39
obesity, fatty liver diseases, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus.6-8
40
Lipid accumulation, such as obesity, is closely related to lipid metabolism, such as
41
adipogenesis and lipogenesis. AMPK adjusts the metabolism of fats and
42
carbohydrates to regulate cellular energy homeostasis.9 Upon activation, AMPK
43
inhibits the expressions of Sterol regulatory element binding protein (SREBP1c),
44
CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein
(C/EBPα),
peroxisome proliferator-activated
3
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
45
receptor γ (PPARγ), and their downstream genes, and it thereby suppresses
46
adipogenesis.10 SREBP1c is one of the transcription factors involved in adipogenesis
47
and lipogenesis; it activates genes and enzymes, such as fatty acid synthase (FAS),
48
stearoyl-CoA desaturase-1 (SCD1), which are related to adipocyte maturation and
49
biosynthesis of triglycerides and fatty acids; they thus regulate lipogenesis
50
preferentially.9 At the same time, it is important to note that mechanisms of adipocyte
51
differentiation have been extensively studied using in vitro systems in which 3T3-L1
52
is one of the most frequently employed cell lines. 3T3-L1 cells were clonally isolated
53
from Swiss 3T3 cells derived from disaggregated mouse embryos for the past 40
54
years.11
55
In our previous experiment, by using different chromatographic methods (such as a
56
silica gel column, macroporous adsorbent resin, ODS, Sephadex, and Prep-HPLC),
57
we isolated over fifty compounds from Artemisia sacrorum and elucidated their
58
structures by their physical and chemical properties and nuclear magnetic resonance
59
(NMR) techniques. Among them, more than twenty were flavonoids some of which
60
had inhibitory effects on lipid accumulation as reported in the literature.12-15 For
61
example, luteolin treatment was found to inhibit adipogenic, lipogenic, and GLUT4
62
genes and thereby reduced the levels of triglyceride in 3T3-L1 cells during
63
adipogenesis.12 In another study, quercetin was observed to suppress lipid
64
accumulation in 3T3-L1 cell, zebrafish, and mouse models by inhibiting the
65
expressions of lipogenic and adipogenic cytokines.13 At the same time, some of these
66
flavonoids had inhibitory effects on lipid accumulation in our preliminary
4
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 4 of 38
Page 5 of 38
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
67
experiments. So there were twelve compounds that had the potential to inhibit lipid
68
accumulation in the literature or in our previous experiments. Especially, acacetin had
69
strong activity and good reproducibility. Many monomer compounds exist in
70
traditional medicinal plants or prescriptions, and they form the material basis for drug
71
effectiveness. In many cases, there may be synergy between two or more monomers
72
in effecting a cure or reducing toxicity.16 For example, both in vivo and in vitro,
73
co-treatment of the monomer compound choline and ferulic acid from the traditional
74
herb Rhizoma coptidis demonstrated less toxicity and stronger anti-hyperglycemic
75
effects synergistically than the original herbal extract.17 Furthermore, in the treatment
76
of acute promyelocytic leukemia, indirubin, tetraarsenic tetrasulfide and tanshinone
77
IIA from the Realgar-Indigo naturalis formula demonstrated a synergistic effect in
78
vitro and in vivo models.18 Various constituents in a herb or formula may improve the
79
bioavailability, or they may act differently on target genes, proteins and channels to
80
effect a cure or reduce toxicity so as to produce synergistic effects.16
81
So we wonder if acacetin and eleven other flavonoids have synergistic inhibitory
82
effects on lipid accumulation. If so, how does it relate to the protein and gene
83
expressions mentioned above? In the present study, we aimed to identify if there are
84
any synergistic effects in inhibiting lipid accumulation between acacetin and each of
85
eleven other flavonoids isolated from Artemisia sacrorum.
86
MATERIALS AND METHODS
87
Chemicals and Reagents. Twelve compounds: jaceosidin (compound 1),
88
kaempferol (compound 2), chrysoeriol (compound 3), quercetin (compound 4),
5
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 6 of 38
89
apigenin (compound 5), hispidulin (compound 6), luteolin (compound 7), quercitrin
90
(compound 8), rutin (compound 9), isorhamnetin (compound 10), genkwanin
91
(compound 11), acacetin (compound 12), were all isolated from Artemisia sacrorum
92
in our previous study (Figure 1). The quantities of these compounds ranged from
93
several milligrams to dozens of milligrams. After multiple purification, the purity of
94
each of these compounds was more than 98% respectively. 3T3-L1 cells were
95
purchased from ATCC (Manassas, VA). Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium
96
(DMEM),
97
penicillin-streptomycin were purchased from Gibco by Life Technologies (Grand
98
Island, NY). TG assay Kit was purchased from Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering
99
Institute, China. Protein extraction, EASY BLUE total RNA extraction, and
100
ECL-reagent kits were from Intron Biotechnology Inc (Beverly, MA, USA). Bio-Rad
101
protein assay kit was from Bio-Rad Laboratories (Hercules, CA, USA). Acetyl-CoA
102
carboxylase (ACC), phospho-ACC (pACC), AMPK, and phospho-AMPK (pAMPK)
103
antibodies were from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA, USA). Anti-actin was
104
from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA).
Bovine
Serum
(FCS),
Fetal
Bovine
Serum
(FBS)
and
105
Cell culture and cytotoxicity assay. 3T3-L1 cells were cultured in DMEM
106
containing 10% fetal calf serum (FCS), 100 unit/mL penicillin and 100 μg/mL
107
streptomycin at 37 ℃ in an atmosphere of 5% CO2. For cytotoxicity assay, 3×104
108
3T3-L1 cells per well were cultured in 96-well plates and treated with twelve
109
compounds at the concentrations of 0, 10, 20, 40 or 80 µM for 96 h, respectively. The
110
cytotoxicities of these compounds were determined by the MTT assay.19
6
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 7 of 38
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
111
Adipocyte differentiation and treatments. 3T3-L1 cells were divided into normal
112
control (CON) group, differentiated control treated with differentiation medium (DM)
113
group, differentiated positive control treated with differentiation medium plus
114
pioglitazone (PIO) group, and twelve individual treatment groups treated with twelve
115
compounds alone respectively, and eleven combined treatment groups treated with
116
combinations of compound 12 plus compound X (X=1-11) respectively. Individual
117
treatment groups were treated with 20 µM of compounds 2, 3, 5-12, respectively; 10
118
µM of compounds 1, 4, respectively. Combined treatment groups were treated with
119
combinations of compound 12 (10 µM) plus compounds 2, 3, 5-11 (10 µM)
120
respectively, and combinations of compound 12 (10 µM) plus compounds 1, 4 (5 µM)
121
respectively.
122
5×105 3T3-L1 cells per well were cultured in 6-well culture plates. When the cells
123
were incubated until confluence (day 0), they were exposed to differentiation medium
124
I (DM)(DMEM, 5% FBS, 10 µg/mL insulin, 1 mM dexamethasone and 0.5 mM
125
3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine) for 4 days (day 4); and then, except CON group, the
126
cells were exposed to differentiation medium II (DMEM containing 5% FBS and 10
127
µg/mL insulin) for 2 more days (day 6); and then, except CON group, the cells were
128
exposed to differentiation medium III (DMEM containing 5% FBS) for 2 more days
129
(day 8). During adipocyte differentiation, the cells were treated with corresponding
130
compounds for corresponding concentrations from day 0 to day 4.
131
Oil-Red O staining. The differentiated cells were mildly washed twice with
132
phophate-buffered saline (PBS), and fixed with 10% formalin for 1 h. Then the cells
7
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
133
were stained with Oil-Red O Solution for 2 h, after that the solution was removed.
134
Next the plates were washed with water three times. The pictures were taken by an
135
Olympus microscope. Then 6-well plates were treated with isopropanol and lipid
136
accumulation was determined using the absorbance at 540 nm.
137
Measurement of triglyceride level. To measure triglyceride (TG) content, the
138
3T3-L1 cells were lysed in lysis buffer (25 mM sucrose, 20 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM
139
EDTA and 1 mM EGTA) and the lysis buffer were collected and centrifugated at
140
13,000 rpm for 15 min. And the levels of TG were measured by using TG assay Kit in
141
accordance with the instructions of the manufacturer. The concentration of protein
142
was determined using a Bio-Rad protein assay reagent (Bio-Rad Laboratories,
143
Hercules, CA, USA) in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.
144
To prove the synergy in our experiments, here we designed another validation
145
experiment of TG determination in which two doses (20 μM and 40 μM) were set for
146
compounds 12 and 5, respectively; in addition, when the total dose was 20 μM or 40
147
μM, three combinations were set according to the dose-ratio of the two
148
drugs(compound 12: compound 5=3:1, 1:1, and 1:3). Then combination index (CI)
149
and drug reduction index (DRI) were calculated using CompuSyn software
150
(ComboSyn Inc, Paramus, NJ, USA).
151
Western blot analysis.
152
The 3T3-L1 cells were washed twice with ice-cold PBS and a protein extraction
153
kit(Intron biotechnology, USA) was used to extract total protein which was
154
centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 20 min to remove insoluble protein.
8
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 8 of 38
Page 9 of 38
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
155
The supernatant was collected from the lysates and protein concentrations were
156
determined using a Bio-Rad protein assay reagent following the manufacturer's
157
instructions. A Bio-Rad protein assay kit was used to measure protein concentrations
158
in cell lysates. After separation with 8% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
159
(SDS-PAGE), equal amounts of proteins (40 μg) proteins were transferred to
160
polyvinylidene difluoride membranes(Millipore, Bedford, MA).
161
The membranes were further incubated for 1 h with blocking solution
162
(Tris-buffered saline/Tween 20 [TBST] containing 5% skin milk (wt/vol)) at room
163
temperature, and then incubated with primary antibodies over night at 4°C. Then the
164
membranes were washed 4 times with 0.1% TBST and incubated with secondary
165
antibody for 1 h at room temperature. An enhanced chemiluminescence Western
166
blotting detection kit was used to detect the protein bands which were then exposed to
167
X-ray film.
168
RNA isolation and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).
169
An EASY-BLUE total RNA extraction kit was used to isolate the total RNA in
170
accordance with the manufacturer`s instructions. 5 μg of RNA, oligo (15) dT primers,
171
and reverse transcriptase in total volume of 50 μL were used to achieve the
172
First-strand cDNA synthesis. PCR reactions were done in a total volume of 20 μL
173
consisted of 2 μL of cDNA product, 0.8 unit of Taq polymerase, 20 pmol of each
174
primer, and 0.2 mM of each dNTP. In order to amplify the cDNA fragments, PCR was
175
performed at 95 ℃ for 30 sec, followed by 50 ℃ (FAS, ACC, C/EBPα), 56 ℃
176
(SCD1), 58 ℃ (SREBP1c, Actin, glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase (GPAT)),
9
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
177
55 ℃ (PPARγ), respectively for 30 s, and 72 ℃ for 1 min. The RT-PCR products were
178
electrophoresed in 1% agarose gels under 100 V and were stained with 0.5 µg/mL
179
ethidium bromide. The primers were shown in Table 1.
180
Statistical analysis. All data were expressed as a mean±standard error and
181
differences between groups were analyzed by one- way ANOVA analysis followed by
182
Student Newman Keuls. Each value was the mean of at least three separate
183
experiments in each group and mean values were considered significantly different
184
when p