The Conductance of Aqueous Solutions as a Function of the

more important of these equations and the back- ground of the problem the reader is referred to a recent paper by Jones and Bickford.' Potassium ferro...
0 downloads 0 Views 472KB Size
THECONDUCTANCE OF POTASSIUM FERROCYANIDE SOLUTIONS

Dec., 1936

256 1

[CONTRIBUTIONFROM THE MALLINCKRODT CHEMICAL LABORATORY OF HARVARD UNIVERSITY]

The Conductance of Aqueous Solutions as a Function of the Concentration. 11. Potassium Ferrocyanide BY GRINNELL JONES

AND

Introduction The conductance of solutions is greatly influenced by the valence type of salt and therefore data on salts of a high valence type may serve as a severe and useful test of the validity and generality of the various equations which have been proposed for the conductance as a function of the concentration. For an historical review of the more important of these equations and the background of the problem the reader is referred to a recent paper by Jones and Bickford.' Potassium ferrocyanide seemed to be the most suitable salt of the 1-4 valence type because it is only very slightly hydrolyzed and is sufficiently soluble and stable and was therefore selected for this investigation.

FREDERIC C. JELEN

At each concentration at least two but sometimes three or four independent solutions were prepared. The actual concentrations were commonly slightly different from the round concentrations desired. Slight corrections were applied t o bring the results for the conductivity to the round concentration. These corrections were rarely more than 0.01% and in only one caSe more than 0.06%. The detailed data on each solution and the corrections to round concentration are omitted to save space in printing. No corrections have been applied for hydrolysis because tests made by indicators and a quinhydrone electrode on a 0.01 molar solution gave a $H of 7.5, from which it may be inferred that the effect of hydrolysis would be negligible. The results are shown in Tables I and 11, in which c is the concentration in moles per liter and A is the molar conductance.

Interpretation of the Data

Figure 1 is a plot of the molar conductance against the square root of the concentration. The experimental data a t 25' are represented by Experimental the centers of the circles. This gives a curve Potassium ferrocyanide was prepared for this investigation by two different methods. The best material avail- which is similar to the curves given by salts of able by purchase was twice recrystallized from conduc- lower valence types except that the slope and tivity water by dissolving at 60", filtering through a sin- curvature in the dilute end are greater than has tered glass filter and cooling to 0 ', followed by centrifugal been found for salts of lower valence type. The drainage. Since there was a slight indication of instacurve is nearly straight a t the dilute end but there bility of these solutions a t 60°, we also prepared other is evidently some curvature even below 0.001 samples by dissolving the salt in cold water and precipitating it by adding redistilled ethyl alcohol followed by molar. Putting a straight line through the four centrifugal drainage. The entire process was then re- lowest concentrations gives the equation A = peated. This method gave small crystals which were al- 741.9 4637 4 (line K in Fig. 1). This most white in color. No difference in the conductivity method of extrapolation must give a value for the could be detected between the salt prepared by the two limiting conductance and limiting slope a t infinite methods of purification. The salt was then placed in a platinum boat in a tube and dilution which is too low unless there is a change heated at 90" in a stream of dry nitrogen for about two in curvature at extreme dilution for which there is hours. The salt was cooled in nitrogen and the nitrogen no experimental evidence or theoretical warrant. replaced by dry air. The boat and salt was then bottled This equation, which has the form suggested by without exposure to the moist air of the laboratory in a Richards bottling apparatus. Repeated experiments Kohlrausch, fails completely above 0.001 molar demonstrated that a repetition of the heating and drying as is evident from the figure. process did not change the weight by as much as 0.01%. The coefficients of the Jones and Dole equation The preparation of the solutions and the measurement of were determined by the method of least squares their conductivity at 25 and 0 were so similar to the procedure used by Jones and Bickford that no further de- using all the experimental points including c = scription is needed. The cell constants were determined 0.5 molar or 2 N , giving the equation

-

O

by the use of the values for the conductance of standard potassium chloride solutions determined by Jones and Bradshaw.' The density of each solution was determined by means of a large (65 cc.) pycnometer at both 25 and 0". (1) Orinnell Jones and C. F. Bickford, THISJOURNAL, 56, 602

(1934). (2) Grinnell Jones and

B.

C. Bradshaw, ibid., 55, 1780 (1983).

A = 785.16-

9171'38 17.106 .\Tc

1

+

- 12.84~.

The curve marked J in Fig. 1 is the plot of this equation and as will be seen it agrees with the experimental data so closely that the deviations are not apparent on the scale that can be printed.

2562

GRINNELL JONES

1

a

C

A

0.00025 .00036 .0005 .00075 .OOl .002 .005 .Ol .02 .0475 .05 .1 .2 .5

,

AND

FREDERIC C. JELEN

VOl. 58

TBLE I CONDUCTANCE OF POTASSIUM FERROCYANIDE SOLUTIONS AT 25' 4

8

7 Onsager

J&D

bd

1)

668.94 653.52 638.04 615.11 598.33 554.18 491.29 445,28 403.72 360.45 (358.14) 332.01 310.90 282.63

-2.08 -0.26 +1.22 +1.00 +1.40 4-1.43 -0.30 -1.40 -1.84 -1.35

1.00055 1.00080 1.00103 1.00138 1.00163 1.00244 1.00451 1.00744 1.01255 1.02525

+O. 63 $2.48 -0.90

1.04839 1.09414 1.26347

669.31 654.04 638.70 615.96 599.31 555.53 493.52 448.59 408.79 369.55

-2.07 -0.33 +1.08 +0.81 +l. 15 +1.11 -0.40 -1.18 -1.25 -0.57

724.45 719.95 716.14 710.40 708.21 709.70 742.39 817.10 981 1507

8

O $AF

+15.76 -10.63 5.83 - 1.83 - 6.25 +15.04 -18.10 -10.67 2.56 +18.53

+ +

348.08 +0.87 f12.09 340.17 -17.89 +1.41 357* 09 -0.60 2.63 9171.38 c< 12,84G Equations: Jones and Dole, column 3; A = 785.16 1 17.106