The oxidation of 3-aminophthalhydrazide ("luminol") as a lecture

The oxidation of 3-aminophthalhydrazide ("luminol") as a lecture demonstration of chemiluminescence. Ernest H. Huntress, Lester N. Stanley and Almon S...
11 downloads 13 Views 5MB Size
The OXIDATION of 3-AMINOPHTHALHYDRAZIDE ("LUMINOL") as a LECTURE DEMONSTRATION of CHEMILUMINESCENCE* ERNEST H. HUNTRESS, LESTER N. STANLEY, Attention is directed to the most striking instance of chemiluminescence whuh appears to have b m observed and to the extraordinary advantages which the reaction possesses mer the conventional cases. A simple economical two-stage synthesis of 3-aminophthulhydrazide is described which readily gives excellent yields of +re product. Specifcc directions are given for demonstration of its brilliant chemiluminescence i n dilute aqueous alkaline oxidizing agents.

T

HE STUDY of chemical reactions in which visible light is evolved a t ordinary or low temperatures has largely been left to physics, physical .chemistry, or biochemistry. Nevertheless, countless instances of such development of visible radiation are on record and many (if not most) involve organic compounds. However, in the vast majority of cases either the amount of light evolved is not impressive, or the reaction is brought about only under inconvenient conditions, or the substances involved are expensive or difficultly accessible. Partly for these reasons general attention to the matter has been but occasional and the most impressive and convenient illustration of the phenomenon appears to have been largely overlooked. Most chemiluminescent reactions are oxidations. Extensive rCsumCs of hundreds of inbvidual cases are already available.' Of the many instances of organic compounds of known structure given in these references there appears to be a small group which gives a maximum of visible light. This group includes the following: (1) various reactions of Grignard compounds, such as the Wedekindereaction between chloropiain and phenylmagnesium bromide in ether solution, the reaction of Grignard compounds with other nitro compound^,^ or the oxidation of various Grignard

* Contribution No. 101 from the Research Laboratory of Organic Chemistry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts. (a) Truurz, Z. wiss. Phot., 2 , 217-23 (1904); (b) Z. phyn'k. 3. Biol. Chem., 31, 311-6 Chcm., 53, 1-111 (1905); (c) HARVEY, (1417) ,---.,.

( a ) WEDEKIND, Ber. deut. physik. Ges., 4 , 417 (1906); ( 5 ) Phyrik. Z . , 7 , 805 (1906); (6) Z . nuiss. Phot., 5, 29 (1907); ( d ) HECZKO, Chem.-Ztg.. 35, 199 (1911). (a) GILMAN, MCGLUMPW, AND FOTEERGILL, RCC.trav. chim., 49, 526-31 (1930); ( b ) 49, 726-8 (1930).

AND

ALMON S. PARKER

compound^,^ notably (1) pchlorophenylmagnesium bromide; (2) the Trautz-Schorigin6 oxidation of pyrogallol-formalin solutions in potassium carbonate by means of 30% hydrogen peroxide (perbydrol); (3) the oxidation%y means of hydrogen peroxide or halogens of alcoholic alkaline solutions of lophine (2,4,5-triphenylimidawle) or amarine (4,5-dihydro-2,4,5-triphenylimidazole). It will readily be noted that even these reactions involve certain difficulties. For example, some of the materials are unpleasant to handle (e. g., chloropicrin is a lachrymator, Grignard reagents are unstable and involve the use of ether solutions, 30% hydrogen peroxide is dangerous to handle, unstable, expensive, and not always readily accessible, amarine and lophine not very readily preparable, and their oxidation in strong alcoholic alkali is not well suited to convenient demonstration). In contrast to these difficulties the production of chemiluminescent effects by means of the oxidation of 3-aminophthalhydrazideposse& great advantage. The reaction is carried out in exceedingly dilute aqueous alkaline solution, it requires but the very mildest and most easily accessible oxidants, it utilizes ordinary pharmaceutical (3%) hydrogen peroxide, and the essential reagent itself is naw readily obtainable. Furthermore, the brilliance of tht effects which can be produced far surpasses any of the other recorded cases. Dufford, Calvert, and Nightingale" state: "The [chemiluminescence from the] compound p-CICaHaMgBr is much brighter than any other so far found. Careful pyrometric measurements show that it is brighter even than luciferm, except possibly for the bright specks in the luciferin solution and therefore probably the brightest case of chemiluminescence on record." We find, however, that the brilliance of light which is produced under optimum conditions from the oxidation of "lnminol" renders that from this Grignard reagent dim by comparison.

' (a) EVANSAND DUPPORD,3. Am. C h m . Soc., 45, 278-85 CALVERT, AND NIGR~NGALE, ibid., 45, (1923); (b) DUPFORD, 2058-72 (1923); (c) D~FFORD, NIGHTINGALE, AND CALVERT, ibid., 47,95-102 (1925); ( d ) EVANSAND DIEPENHORST, ibid., 48, 715-23 (1926). (a) TRAuTz, Z. Elcktrochem., 10, 593-6 (1904); (b) TRAWTZ AND SCHORIGIN, Z. tom. Phot., 3, 121-30 (1905-6). "(a) RADZISZEWSKI, Ber., 10, 70-5 (1877); (b) BHATNAGAR AND MATHUR. Z. physik. Chem., 159, 454-8 (1932).

1 2

3-Aminophthalhydrazide (I), also referred to in the literature as 5-amino-1.4-dihydroxyphthalazine,*was first reported by Schmitz' as the result of a long synthesis starting with triethyl hemimellitate. Later 0

ONa

0

(Cf. Refs. 7, 8) and begins directly with 3-nitrophthalic acid.'3 It avoids the excess of expensive hydrazine required by early investigators and uses only that amount actually needed for the heterocyclic ring. By substituting sulfide as the reducing agent it avoids the difficulties attendant upon the separation of an amphoteric reduction product from a stannous solution. The new process is readily adaptable to the preparation of large amounts of material, if desired, and gives excellent yields of pure product. The yield of 3-nitrophthalhydrazide is quantitative, its reduction to aminophthalhydrazide is nearly so. The PreNration of 3-Nitrophthu1hydrazide.-Bogert

and Boroschek,14who first reported this compound, and Curtius and Sempers obtained it by heating the mono also Radulescu and AlexalZbevaporated the liquid obethyl ester of 3-nitrophthalic acid for ten hours with tained by adding to one mol of 3-nitrophthalic acid in excess hot hydrazine hydrate. In 1928 Albrechtg alcohol one mol of hydrazine (in the form of hydrazine drew attention to the chemiluminescence of the ma- hydrate solution), and heated the residue a t 250" terial and carried out some spectral measurements. for a long time to form the cyclic hydrazide. We prefer However, the actual method of preparation of his ma- the following method which avoids the use of hydrazine terial was not given in the above reference but only hydrate, is more rapid, and gives quantitative yields. Solid hydrazine sulfate (130 g. or 1 mol) and crysin the dissertation10 itself. Starting from 3-nitrophthalic acid it passed successively through the diam- tallized sodium acetate (272 g. or 2 mols) are dismonium salt, 3-nitrophthalimide, 3-aminophthalimide, solved in 400 ml. of hot water and the clear solution and finally 3-aminophthalhydrazide. No yields are added to solid 3-nitrophthalic acid (211 g. or 1 mol) recorded in any of these steps and our attempts to use contained in an 8" porcelain evaporating dish. The the method gave very unsatisfactory results. In 1929 latter is placed upon a tripod and evaporated as rapidly Harvey," obtaining his material from Albrecht, ex- as possible over a free flame with constant stirring with amined the chemiluminescence observed during elec- a flat porcelain spatula to avoid bumping or decomtrolysis. During the progress of our present work a position. This operation requires about 1.5 hours and statement1% appeared noting that 3-nitrophthalhy- is best conducted a t a hood in order to facilitate evapodrazide could be reduced to the amino compound by ration and to remove the acetic acid vapors. The means of hydrogen sulfide, hut no details were given residual dry solid is removed from.the dish, ground to nor yields stated. Apart from the above references no a fine powder, placed in a wide-mouthed flask or beaker, further mention of 3-aminophthalhydrazide could be and heated for a t least three hours a t a temperature of 160 * lo0 in a suitable oil bath. During this operafound in the chemical literature. tion the solid should frequently be stirred and if there is any tendency toward caking in the earlier part of the THE PREPARATION OF 3-AMINOPHTHALHYDRAZIDE' baking it may be necessary to remove and powder the We report here a method of preparation which avoids material before continuing. It is advfsable to measure all the weaknesses of preceding procedures. The the temperature in the heated powder rather than reaction involves first the preparation of 3-nitrophthal- externally and care must be taken not to overheat the hydrazide and its subsequent reduction to 3-amino- mass. The escape of steam may also be facilitated by phthalhydrazide by means of ammonium sulfide. The passing a gentle stream of air through the flask. method avoids difficultly accessible starting materials When the heating is finished, remove the solid, powder, and extract twice with 350 ml. of hot water to * In the interest of assigning to this compound a simpler and remove sodium sulfate. The residual solid is then more euphonious name we prefer to csll the material "luminol." This associates it with the idea of luminescence and denotes its dried a t 105' to constant weight: yield, 206 g. 3-nitroenolic character. We do not regard as important the possible phthalhydrazide (99.5% theoretical). The product so objection that the name might be confused with the hypnotic obtained is free from sulfate, melts 297' to 300' u.c., "luminal." and is sufficiently pure for reduction without further 1 (a) SCHMITZ,Dissertation, Heidelberg. 1902; (6) Cf. Cun'crus AND Scmrrz, J. prakt. Chem., 91,46.97 (1915). treatment.f CURTIUS AND SEMPER, Ber., 46,1162-71 (1913). Reduction of 3-Nitrophthulhydrazide to 3-AminoALBREWIT, Z.physik. Chenz.. 136, 321-30 (1928). ' 0 ALBREWIT. Dissert~tion.Friedrich-Wilhelms Univ.. Berlin, 1928. "HARVEY,J . Phys. Chem.. 33, 145G9 (1929). 1% (a) RnoaEscu am ALEXA.2. phy{k. C k m . , B8, 382-94 (1930); (b)Bull. soc. chim. RomSnia, 12, 140-63 (1930). t Experimenters who may not care to prepare this substance for themselves can now obtain it from the Synthetic Organic Chemicals Department of the Eastman Kodak Company, Rochester, N. Y.

'3 "Organic syntheses," John Wiley & Sons, Iuc.. New York City, 1927, Vol. 7, pp. 70-2. I4 BOGERT AND BOROSMEK, J. Am. Chem. SOC..23,750 (1901). $NOTE: Although BOGERT AND BonoscHEKU state that 3nitrophthalhydrazide melts with decomposition at about 320" we have consistently observed values close to 300' u s . FLADU~ s s c uAND ALEXAI~ give m. p. 310-311' but do not state whether corrected or not.

LIQUIDLIGHT This photograph was taken in an otherwise absolutely dark room by means of the light given off during the oxidation of "lnminol" according to the method described in the accompanying article.

In some runs all the sulfur remains in the excess sulfide solution and a yield of very pure "luminol," as high as 64.5%, has been obtained directly a t this point. The filtrate from this primary precipitate is then acidified with a slight excess of glacial acetic acid and the resultant precipitate of mixed sulfur and "luminol" is filtered with suction, washed with water, and dried. In order to free the aminophthalhydrazide from sulfur, the crude mixture is stirred up with that amount of 5% aqueous sodium hydroxide solution which would just correspond to the assumption that the dry solid coutained no sulfur. After stirring and very slight warming the solution is filtered from undissolved sulfur, cooled to 0°, and stirred, and scratched. Presently precipitation of the mono-sodium salt of 3-aminophthalhydrazide (II or Ila)+begins and increases for some time. Finally, the solid is filtered with suction, pressed as dry as possible on the filter, then washed sparingly with dry alcohol or ether. It may then be dried in the air, if it is to be preserved as the sodium salt. If, however, it is desired to reconvert the substance to "luminol" the original solid is not washed with alcohol but is redissolved in water, and reprecipitated by adding a slight excess of glacial acetic acid. The voluminous flocculent precipitate is again filtered with suction, washed free from sodium acetate with water, and dried. The product so obtained is free from sulfur and melts a t 319-320' u.c.: The color of the final 3-aminophthalhydrazide appeared to vary according to the mode of precipitation from almost white to quite deep yellow. Anal. Calcd. for CsH,N30z: C, 54.22, H, 3.98, N, 23.73%; Found, C, 54.20,54.31, H, 4.48,4.62, N, 24.20, 24.02; Neut. Equiv., Calcd. 177. Found 175.

phthalhydrazide ("Luminol").-The crude 3 - nitroDEMONSTRATION OF CHEMILUMINESCENCE OF Ophthalhydrazide (e. g., 192.5 g. or 0.93 mol) is then AMINOPHTHALHYDRAZIDE gradually added in small increments to 1 liter of 6 N The chemiluminescence is produced by treatment ammonium sulfide solution.*, Vigorous spontaneous reduction occurs and the flask may r+equire considerable of a dilute aqueous alkaline solution of "luminol" external cooling. After all the solid nitrohydrazide with (both) hydrogen peroxide and another oxidizing has been added the resultant solution or suspension is agent. Strong radiation is not produced in the absence kept at the boiling point for an hour while additional of any one of the four components, although "luminol" hydrogen sulfide is passed into the mixture. During and dilute hydrogen peroxide give a very faint glow the reduction the original nitrohydrazide finally com- even without the other .oxidizing agent. The repletely dissolves; later, however, the precipitation of action occurs only in alkaline solution, and its intensity the resultant "luminol" begins, and these two processes and duration vary with the alkalinity. Up to a cermay sometimes overlap in such a way that there is al- tain point the amount of light evolved increases with ways some solid present in the flask. After the discon- increase in alkali concentration. The mode of evolutinuance of the hydrogen sulfide treatment the solution tion of light appears to vary considerably with the nais boiled for an hour more to complete the reaction and ture of the oxidant apparently being most satisfactory then allowed to stand until cold. The resultant yellow with very mild oxidizing agents. For demonstration precipitate of mixed sulfur and "luminol" is filtered purposes we much prefer the use of potassium ferriwith suction, thoroughly washed with water, and dried. -

* Nore:

Thissolution is that available as a stock item in most laboratories. It may be prepared by passing hydrogen sulfide gas into 200 ml. of 15 N ammonium hydroxide (sp. gr. 0.90) in a bottle immersed in running water or ice water until the gas is no longer absorbed; 200 ml. more of conc. ammonium hydroxide is then added and the solution diluted to one liter.

t Samples of the sodium salt (dried to constant weight at 105:) were analyzed by igniting in porcelain cmcibles, and convertmg the ash to sodium sulfate. Calcd. for CaHsN10sNa: Na, 11.55%. Found: 11.77, 11.99. f The melting points reported in this paper were taken with a 360" melting-point thermometer used in a copper block of the Berl and Kuhlman type. Cf.Ber.. 60, 811-4 (1927).

cyanide as the oxidant, and the exyution of the Glass Company, No. 985, 12" diameter by 12" high), add about 14 liters of water and float in this water a experiment in any of the following ways. 1 . Flask Method.-Provide two &liter, long-necked piece of ice of convenient size (e. g., a piece 8-10" on a flat-bottomed flasks and arrange to mix their contents side). Have available a stout stirrer made from a t by pouring through a large glass funnel into a 6-liter, least 10-mm. diameter glass rod. Provide also two flat-bottomed, long-necked flask. In one of the small flat-bottomed flasks (A and B) to contain the smaller flasks dissolve 0.2 g. of "luminol" in 20 ml. of reactants. In flask A dissolve 1.0 g. of "luminol" in 5% sodium hydroxide and dilute to 2 liters with water. 100 ml. of 5% sodium hydroxide. In flask B place a In the other small flask dissolve 0.5 g crystals of potas- solution of 2.5 g. of potassium ferricyanide crystals in sium ferricyanide in water, add 20 ml. of ordinary 3% 100 ml. of 3% hydrogen peroxide. After the room is hydrogen peroxide, and dilute to 2 liters with water. completely darkened pour these two solutions together When hoth solutions are ready for use, grasp one flask over the surface of the cake of ice in such a manner in each hand, have the room completely darkened, and that they mix in more or less concentrated form before then pour the contents of the two smaller flasks simul- being diluted with the surrounding water. The purtaneously through the funnel into the large flask. Re- pose of the ice is not to cool the mixture but merely to action begins as soon as the liquids mix in the funnel convince the audience that the reaction can proceed a t and continues in the large flask for many minutes. 0°C. After the reaction mixture has diffused into the After the initial development of light has begun, swirl main body of solution, stir the jar contents vigorously the contents of the large flask and add a small quantity and add additional solid potassium ferricyanide (crysof solid crystals of potassium ferricyanide. The bril- tal or powder) or alkali, or hoth as desired. liance increases considerably and can be still further 3. Spray Method.-A third novel way in which the improved by gradual addition of further amounts of reaction can be made to produce beautiful eEects in5% sodium hydroxide solution. The concentrations volves the mixing of sprays of the separate stock soluhere recommended are such that the light intensity first tions. For this purpose we have found most satisproduced is fairly small, for the increased brilliance factory a commercial device widely used in textile mill which is produced by the further addition of oxidant humidifying systems under the name N-Type Humidiand of alkali is very beautiful. Enough light is pro- fiers."? Two of these vest-pocket size units are held in duced in the experiment so that as soon as it is under suitable clamps so inclined that the resultant sprays way the demonstrator can easily locate his materials intersect some distance above the lecture table: by in the otherwise darkened room. Since the evolution means of rubber tube connections the humidifiers are of light continues for some minutes it is perfectly connected to a source of compressed air.$ By means of a feasible to allow the larger flask to circulate through suitable short length of mbber tubing each unit is furthe audience to demonstrate that no appreciable heat ther arranged to aspirate up the corresponding solution effect is developed. from a stock bottle placed belowit. With a little care In order to show the dependence of light production to be certain that the spray guns are operating a t upon the alkalinity of the solution, swirl the luminescent equal rates, and variation of the stock solutions accontents of the large flask and slowly pour in dilute (6 N ) cording to the desired effect, the resultant mist may vary hydrochloric acid until light evolution stops. If then from a barely perceptible luminous cloud to an exthe solution be immediately made alkaline again with ceedingly brilliant fountain reminiscent of a pyrothe 5% alkali the luminescent reaction recommences technical display. In using this method the alkali and continues until either the "luminol" & the oxidant concentration must be adjusted to a point where it does is exhausted. Another way of demonstrating this not annoy the audience. same point is to use in flask A, not the alkaline solution 4. The Cloth Method.-The very simplest and often of "luminol," but simply a water solution of 0.25 g. of most effectiveexperiment is merely to soak an ordinary the "luminol" sodium salt. (See above.) Under white laboratory towel in a literpf 0.1% luminol soluthese circumstances no significant luminescence occurs tion containing 5 to 10 cc. of 5% sodium hydroxide on mixing until after free alkali has also been supplied. and 5 to 10 cc. of 3% hydrogen peroxide, wring out 2. The Jar Method.-For demonstration to large most of the excess liquid, and then pour directly on the audiences the following variant of the experiment may towel 2.5% potassium ferricyanide solution. The be employed. Provide a large pyrex jar (e. g., Corning towel then glows like a live coal and on further wring'These experiments were included in a demonstration of iue vields liquid drops which elow like fire. chemilumine&ence shown at the Society of Arts Popular Science Lecture on Fehruaty 15, 1931, and also at a meeting of the Northeastern Section of the American Chemical &kty held at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology on April 29, 1933. Photographs of some of the effects obtained were printed in the Technology Rmiew, 35, 282 (May, 1933), by whose permission they are here reproduced.

-.

t These can be obtained from the Parks-Cramer Company of Boston. Mass. f NOTE: If a compressed air tap is not available it is possible to utilize a commercial tank of oxygen or nitrogen, provided that a suitable reducing valve is attached to it far regulation.