The Polarity of Ionic Liquids: Relationship between Relative

ACS2GO © 2019. ← → → ←. loading. To add this web app to the home screen open the browser option menu and tap on Add to homescreen...
0 downloads 0 Views 519KB Size
Subscriber access provided by UNIV AUTONOMA DE COAHUILA UADEC

Thermodynamics, Transport, and Fluid Mechanics

The Polarity of Ionic Liquids: relationship between relative permittivity and spectroscopic parameters of probe Xinyu Wang, Songna Zhang, Jia Yao, and Haoran Li Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.9b00485 • Publication Date (Web): 09 Apr 2019 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on April 10, 2019

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research

The Polarity of Ionic Liquids: relationship between relative permittivity and spectroscopic parameters of probe Xinyu Wanga,//, Songna Zhanga,//, JiaYaoa, and Haoran Li*a,b aDepartment

of Chemistry, ZJU-NHU United R&D Center, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027 (P.R. China); bState Key Laboratory of Chemical Engineering Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027 (P.R. China)

Abstract: Polarity is one of the most important properties of Ionic liquids (ILs) and an essential requirement when choosing an IL for a specific industrial application. Up to now, several empirical solvent polarity scales, such as Hildebrand solubility parameter, relative permittivity, the electronic transition energy of the longest-wavelength Vis absorption band of betaine dye no. 30 [ET(30) value] and the hyperfine coupling constant (AN) etc. have been applied to ILs to provide quantitative evaluation of the polarity of ILs. Among them, the ET(30) value is widely used to reflect the polarity of ILs, however, it cannot be determined for opaque solvents and for solvents in which betaine dye no. 30 is insoluble. To broaden its scope of application and uniform the polarity standard, many approaches were used to predict the values of ET(30). Herein, we managed to apply a modified semi-empirical reaction field of molecular solvents to predict the ET(30) and AN values of spin probe in ILs. Based on the experimental and estimated ET(30) values of 791 data entries, 240 ILs, 108 cations, and 34 anions of ILs, an “overall” polarity sequence of ILs can be obtained: primary, secondary and tertiary alkylammonium salts > heterocyclic salts > quaternary alkylammonium salts ≈ phosphonium salts ≈ guanidinium salts.

Introduction Ionic liquids (ILs) with many attractive properties are considered as potential substitutes to many traditional organic solvents in synthesis, catalysis, separation,1, 2 extraction,3 and other chemical processes, which attracted the attention of a growing number of researchers recently.4-16 The high possibility for structure variations makes them potential “designer solvents”.17-23 Their physicochemical properties can be tailored to suit a target function by changing the ion chemical structures or the incorporation of functional groups.24-29 The solvent polarity is the most important property of ILs for choosing an IL for a specific industrial application.30-37 For example, solubility of the proteins depends on the polarity of ILs.38 Recently, many empirical molecular solvent polarity scales39 have been applied to ILs, attempting to provide quantitative estimates of their polarities, such as the Hildebrand solubility parameter,40-42 kinetic rate constant,15, 43-46 relative permittivity,42, 47-56 and several spectroscopic parameters of the solute.57-64 However, these empirical polarity scales always have their own limitations when applied to ILs, and can even show controversial results.15, 27, 32, 65 Among these polarity scales, the Hildebrand solubility parameter (  H ) is not a good ILs polarity parameter because of its harsh experimental conditions or low accuracy calculated by other parameters.55 The relative permittivity is the most commonly used solvent polarity parameter in molecular solvents which is also used to ILs. The relative permittivity of ILs has been obtained from the microwave dielectric spectra and the values are remarkably lower than those of common polar molecular solvents, which often lead to confusion.53, 66 Since the molar electronic transition energy of the longest-wavelength Vis absorption band of betaine dye no. 30 [ET(30) value] exhibits a good, generally linear correlation with a large number of other solvent-sensitive spectral parameters, such as some UV-Vis absorption bands, the hyperfine coupling constant (AN), and the stokes shift of fluorescence spectra in molecular solvents,67, 68 and also has the same trend with Z-, Ω-, and S-values as well as

many thermodynamic and dynamic data,69-73 ET(30) values are widely used as a polarity parameter for ILs.74-86 Reichardt et al. have collected the ET(30) values of nearly 210 ILs before. Therefore, in this work, ET(30) was chosen as a standard and generally applicable solvent polarity parameter of ILs.87 Due to the limitations of various measurement methods, it is significant to predict ET(30) values accurately for us to study the polarity of ILs.88 Recently, many researchers tried to predict the ET(30) values, however, only multiparameter equations can correlate different ILs polarity parameters well for a wide range of ILs.89-92 Many groups attempted to use the equation derived by Marcus93 from the Kamlet-Abboud-Taft (KAT) equation of 166 organic molecular solvents to predict the ET(30) values of ILs.94-98 However, it consists of four empirical parameters which cannot allow us to directly compare the polarity of ILs.99-107 This may hinder the complete and most efficient utilization of ILs. Other dyes whose electronic transition energies corresponding to their longest-wavelength Vis absorption band and having an excellent linear correlation with the ET(30) values, are also used to calculate the ET(30) values of ILs.57, 86, 108 Amongst these dyes, the ET(33) values (derived from betaine dye no. 33) are widely used.109-114 Moreover, because AN correlates satisfactorily with the ET(30) values of molecular solvents,67 EPR spectroscopy has also been used to obtain ET(30) values indirectly.61 Furthermore, Baker et al. used the classic Onsager reaction field model to study polarity but found that it is not applicable to ILs polarity research.49 In the previous work, we proposed a modified semi-empirical reaction field to relate ET(30), AN, and relative permittivity, which worked well for both aprotic and protic solvents. Here, we try to estimate ET(30) and AN values from the relative permittivity by using this modified reaction field on ILs. Consequently, 791 data entries, 240 ILs, 108 cations, and 34 anions of both experimental and predicted polarity parameters are summarized and a whole picture about the polarity sequence of ILs was obtained according to their experimental and estimated ET(30) values. The abbreviations of the terms used in this work are given in Table S1.

1

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Results and Discussion

solvents such as N,N-dimethylformamide [DMF, ET(30)=43.8]. Besides, the ET(30) values of 1-(2-methoxyethyl)-1-methylpyrrolidinium ILs cover a range of 42.7-64.1 kcal/mol which is a very wide range, suggesting the importance of hydrogen bonding for the polarity of ILs. A discussion of how the molecular structure affects the value of ET(30) was reported by Reichardt.57 Furthermore, the data exhibited in Table S2 shows that the ET(30) values obtained for the same ILs are sometimes different from each other as measured by various research groups. The error of measurements is within 5 kcal/mol except entry 104 [BuMim][Tf2N] whose error is 5.4 kcal/mol and entry 160 [Bupy][BF4] whose error is 6.5 kcal/mol. The reason is probably that it is difficult to obtain ILs with the required purity, and very small amounts of impurities, such as water, can cause differences of the polarity of an IL. For example, the ET(30) value of [BuMim][PF6] is 52.9 kcal/mol with a concentration of water (CH2O) of 0.15 mol/L while the ET(30) value is 52.3 kcal/mol with a CH2O of lower than 6×10-3mol/L.129

1 Collection of experimental polarity parameter values Although many ILs have been reported, their polarity has not been fully understood. To have a better understanding of polarity of ILs, we collected some polarity parameters containing permittivity, ET(30), and AN values of 240 ILs, consisting of 108 cations and 34 anions, from the references given in Table S2. 1.1 Relative Permittivity (εr) In these polarity scales, the permittivities of more than 40 ILs have been reported so far47, 48, 50-53, 115 based on the method of the microwave dielectricspectra.47, 54 The permittivities of many aprotic ILs range from 9 to 16, i. e. they are smaller than that of polar molecular solvents, which is against what we have always known that a electriferous system will form a highly polar environment. In addition, Ekimova et al.116 used the Kirkwood theory117 and Onsager model,118 which are suitable for molecular solvents, to estimate the permittivity of ILs, however, Jin. et al indicated that these theories are not applicable to ILs.119 1.2 Hyperfine Coupling Constant (AN) The hyperfine coupling constant (A) of electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) can also reflect the polarity of ILs.120, 121 Scheme 1 shows four commonly used EPR probes and the isotropic A (14N) values of them are collected in Table S2.60, 61, 67, 121, 122 According to the known A values which ranged from 15 N to 16.5, we can learn that the polarity of these ILs are similar to that of alcohols. However, the available data of AN is limited under the present experimental conditions, and high accuracy is required because of the small range of AN values measured in ILs. OH

NH2

N

N

N

N

N

O

Scheme 2. Molecule structure of betaine dye no.30.

2 Predicted values for the polarity of ILs

I N O

O

O

O

TEMPO

TEMPOL

ATEMPO

CAT-1

Scheme 1. Molecular structures of four commonly used EPR probes.

1.3 Molar electronic transition energy of betaine dye no. 30 [ET(30) value] Compared with the relative permittivity, the ET(30) scale (or the alternative dimensionless normalized ETN scale), is a better parameter to reflect the polarity of ILs,69, 123-127 which is not only easily measured but also exhibits a good linear correlation with other solvent-sensitive spectral parameters.128 The available ETN values of five common families of ILs were reported by Reichardt before.57 The known ET(30) values of ILs are within 42-63 kcal/mol which is in the range of common molecular solvents rather than super polarity. We can learn that the polarities of [CnNH3]+X-, [(Cn)2NH2]+X- and [(Cn)3NH]+X- are in the range of protic molecular solvents, e.g. short-chain alcohols. In contrast, the polarities of [(Cn)4N]+X- ILs such as [(C6)4N][H5C6CO2] are similar to that of aprotic molecular

Page 2 of 13

Recently, many approaches were used to predict the ET(30) values, using corresponding ET(33) and AN values; these predicted values are included in Table S2. In the previous work, our group proposed a modified semi-empirical reaction field to relate ET(30), AN, and relative permittivity through redefining the volume of the Onsager reaction field (Scheme 3), which worked well for both aprotic and protic solvents.130 Herein, we attempt to apply this modified Onsager reaction field model to ILs.

Scheme 3. Molecular model of the modified reaction field.

According to the modified reaction field we introduced before, the ET(30) and AN values are proportional to the reaction field at 298 K according to Eqs. (1) and (2):

2

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 3 of 13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research

ET (30) / kcal mol1  26.556  36466 mol cm 3  ( R / a 3 )

(1)

AN / Gauss  15.083  903.31 mol cm 3  ( R / a 3 )

(2)

same phenomenon occurred with AN in the modified reaction field [Fig. 2(a)]. Actually, ionic interactions are much stronger than hydrogen bonds. Then, the r1 of ILs might be smaller than that of protic solvents based on the rule of protic and aprotic solvents. The length of the first chemical bond remote from the interaction site was found to be an appropriate r1 to ILs systems.

where

a  2r1  r2

(3)

4 V1   r13 3

(4)

4 V2   r23 3

(5)

Major ionic interactions

H 3C N

r2 denotes the radius of the solute molecule (labeled by 2), V1 and V2 are the molar volumes of the solvent molecule (labeled by 1) and the solute molecule 2, r1 is the radius of the primary solvation shell in aprotic solvents, which equals to the length of three chemical bonds remote from the hydrogen atom, where is the most susceptible site to form hydrogen bonds with the solute in ILs, which can be calculated by the UNIFAC method.131 R is defined as:

R

r 1 2 r  1

O

Dye no. 30

N O

(6)

ATEMPO

N CnH2n+1 H

ILs

H 3C H 2N

X

X N CnH2n+1 H ILs

Scheme 4. The major ionic interaction between probes and ILs.

2.1 Applying the modified reaction field on IL systems When the modified reaction field model is used on IL systems, the pyridinium N-phenolate betaine dye (dye no. 30) and 4-amino-2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-piperidine-1-oxyl (ATEMPO) are selected as probes in ILs. Since dye no. 30 is a zwitterionic molecule and the O atom carries a negative charge, the cation of ILs would have a strong ionic interaction with it (Scheme 4). ATEMPO and ILs also display a similar interaction as dye no. 30 (Scheme 4).132, 133 The anion of ILs can also simultaneously interact, to a less extent, with the cationic part of the zwitterionic probes. To simplify the model, the interactions between the anion of ILs and the probe is not considered in this work. Consequently, we applied the modified reaction field to those ILs with both ET(30) and relative permittivity as protic solvents. The results are shown in Fig. 1(a) and manifest clearly that all the ILs points are well above the line of molecular solvents. The

NH3

2.2 Molar volumes obtained according to the UNIFAC method When calculating the r1 of ILs systems, we found that r1 equals to the length of the first chemical bond remote from the interaction site, which leads to the best results, since the ionic interaction is much stronger than the van der Waals' forces and hydrogen-bond interactions. Scheme 5 shows the segmentation of ILs. From the UNIFAC volume parameter VK, the V1 of ion fragments can be calculated [Eq. (7)] and are shown in Tables 1 and 2. All the used VK are the molecular groups due to the complexity and few data capacity of ionic groups, which makes the calculated value a little smaller. n

V1  15.17  Vk

(7)

k 1

N

NO3

BF4

1

N(CF3SO2)2

N

N 2

3 O

N(CF3SO2)2

N

N(CF3SO2)2

N

N(CF3SO2)2 N

4

5

6

N

N

Cl

P

N N

N(CF3SO2)2

7

N 10

8

N(CN)2

N

N(CN)2

9

N(CF3SO2)2

S

11

Scheme 5. Rules for calculating volumes of ILs.

3

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

For example, V1([EtNH3] NO3) = 15.17VK(CH2NH2) = 20.77 cm3 mol-1 (Entry 1 in Scheme 5); V1([BuMim]BF4) = 15.17[VK(CH3N)+2VK(ACH)] = 34.12 cm3 mol-1 (Entry 2 in Scheme 5); V1([MeBuPyrr] Tf2N) = 15.17[VK(CH3N)+3VK(CH2)] = 48.69 cm3 mol-1 (Entry 4 in Scheme 5). Because the positive charge can be delocalized in aromatic rings, and many theoretical works on the analysis of the electron density distribution in imidazole IL systems have clearly shown that the positive charge is delocalized around the imidazolium ring, the VK of imidazole and pyridine are chosen to calculate V1 of corresponding ILs. Phosphorus-containing groups are not common UNIFAC groups, thus the VK of this kind of groups are

Page 4 of 13

hard to find. We used the VK of sulfur-containing groups in place of those of phosphorus-containing groups. In addition, the volumes of dye no. 30 and ATEMPO were obtained based on our quantum chemical calculations, because the volumes of probes we used should be that in the vacuum without any influence of other molecules. The ET(30) values, relative permittivities, and V1 values calculated from the UNIFAC method of 17 ILs are shown in Table 1. The AN values, relative permittivities, and V1 value calculated from the UNIFAC method of 5 ILs are shown in Table 2.

Table 1. Solvent polarity parameters ET(30), measured at 298.15K or room temperature at 1013 hPa, for 17 ILs, taken from refs.57, 87, relative permittivities εr for 17 ILs, taken from refs.15, 48, and vander Waals volumes V1 of ion fragments of the ILs, calculated from the UNIFAC volume parameters, taken from ref.134 -ET(30)’ values are the values predicted by the modified reaction-field model, and σ is the error in ET(30)’ relative to ET(30). No.

ILs

ET(30) kcal mol-1

εr F m-1

R/a3 ×103

V1 cm3 mol-1

ET(30)’ kcal mol-1

σ kcal mol-1

1

[EtMim] BF4

53.7

12.8

0.68812

31.25

51.65

-2.05

2

[BuMim] BF4

52.5

13.9

0.69481

31.25

51.89

-0.61

3

[BuMMim] BF4

49.4

13.3

0.69129

31.25

51.76

2.36

4

[BuMim] PF6

52.3

14.0

0.69536

31.25

51.91

-0.39

5

[EtMim] Tf2N

52.0

12.3

0.68471

31.25

51.52

-0.48

6

[PrMim] Tf2N

51.9

13.3

0.69129

31.25

51.76

-0.14

7

[BuMim] Tf2N

51.5

14.0

0.69536

31.25

51.91

0.41

8

[BuMMim] Tf2N

48.6

14.0

0.69536

31.25

51.91

3.31

9

[BuMim] TfO

52.3

13.2

0.69068

31.25

51.74

-0.56

10

[EtMMim] Tf2N

50.0

12.8

0.68812

31.25

51.65

1.65

11

[EtNH3] NO3

60.0

26.2

0.87462

20.77

58.45

-1.55

12

[HO(CH2)2NH3] HCO2

59.5

61.0

0.90408

20.77

59.52

0.02

13

[Oct3NMe] Tf2N

45.9

8.5

0.52454

48.69

45.68

-0.22

14

[BuPy] Tf2N

51.7

15.3

0.63037

39.44

49.54

-2.16

15

[MeEtPyrr] N(CN)2

48.7

41.5

0.60696

48.69

48.69

-0.01

16

[MeBuPyrr] Tf2N

48.3

14.7

0.56733

48.69

47.24

-1.06

17

[MePentPyrr] Tf2N

49.0

12.5

0.55682

48.69

46.86

-2.14

Table 2. Solvent polarity parameters AN, measured at 298.15K or room temperature at 1013 hPa, for 5 ILs, taken from refs.61, 122, relative permittivities εr for 5 ILs, taken from refs.15, 48, and van der Waals volumes V1 of ionic fragments of the ILs, calculated from the UNIFAC volume parameters, taken from ref.134 -AN’ values are the values predicted by the modified reaction-field model, and σ is the error in AN’ relative to AN. No.

ILs

AN Gauss

εr F m-1

R/a3 ×103

V1 cm3 mol-1

AN’ kcal mol-1

σ kcal mol-1

1

[EtMim] BF4

15.91

12.8

0.001165

31.25

16.14

0.23

2

[BuMim] BF4

16.26

13.9

0.001176

31.25

16.15

-0.11

3

[BuMim] PF6

16.30

14.0

0.001177

31.25

16.15

-0.15

4

[EtMim] EtOSO3

15.82

35.0

0.001257

31.25

16.22

0.40

5

[EtMim] TfO

16.32

16.5

0.001197

31.25

16.16

-0.16

4

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 5 of 13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research

Fig. 1 Plot of ET(30) vs. modified reaction fields. (a) a = the length of three chemical bonds; (b) a = the length of only one chemical bond. The solid line is the fitting of Eq. (1) using data of molecular solvents. Cross dots are the data of molecular solvents and solid dots are the data of ILs.

Fig. 2 Plot of AN vs. modified reaction fields. (a) a = the length of three chemical bonds; (b) a = the length of only one chemical bond. The solid line is the fitting of Eq. (2) using data of molecular solvents. Cross dots are the data of molecular solvents and round dots are the data of ILs.

The relationship between ET(30) and the modified Onsager reaction field of ILs is presented in Fig. 1 (b). Obviously, ET(30) values give a better linear correlation with R/a3 as shown in Fig. 1(b), compared with that in Fig. 1(a). The deviations between experimental values and estimated results (σ) are within the region of molecular solvents. Therefore, this modified semi-empirical model is applicable to IL systems, and ET(30) values increase with increasing relative permittivity of the solvents and with decreasing volume of the primary solvation shell. The ILs [BuMMim][BF4], [BuMMim][Tf2N], and [EtMMim][Tf2N] (Entries 3, 8, and 10 in Table 1) have a substituent group on C-2 position of the imidazoliium ring, thus V1 of them should be larger than that of imidazole, which leads to the estimated larger ET(30). Moreover, a linear relationship is also observed between AN and R/a3 of ILs as shown in Fig. 2 (b). The deviations between experimental values and estimated results (σ) are also within the region found for molecular solvents. In Fig. 1 (b), we can see that the polarity sequence of ILs is: primary alkylammonium salts > pyridinium salts ≈ imidazolium salts > pyrrolidinium salts ≈ quaternary alkylammonium salts.

The result reveals that the structure of cations, to a large extent, influences the polarity of ILs. The strongest polarity similar to that of water [ET(30)=63.1 kcal mol-1] was found for the primary alkylammonium salts. The cations with an aromatic ring, such as the imidazole and pyridine ring, lead to a high polarity which approximates that of ethanol [ET(30)=51.9 kcal mol-1]. The cations with a saturated heterocyclic ring such as pyrrole and quaternary alkylammonium make a medium polarity close to that of 2-propanol [ET(30)=48.6 kcal mol-1]. The anions and substituents can affect the polarity slightly. According to the results, ET(30) and AN increase with the increasing relative permittivity of the solvent and with decreasing volume of the primary solvation shell. Furthermore, there are inconsistencies in order between ET(30) and relative permittivity. For example, according to literature in reaction systems,43 the order of reaction rate for the reaction of Cl- with methyl-p-nitrobenzenesulfonate in ILs and molecular solvents is same with that of ET(30) (Table 3). The order is DCM > DMSO > [BuMPy][Tf2N] > [BuMim][Tf2N] > MeOH. However, the trend in relative permittivity is quite different with reaction rate, especially when comparing ILs with molecular solvents.

5

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Besides, the εr of [BuMim][Tf2N] is 11.7 which is equal to that of [BuMim][BF4]. However, the ET(30) value of [BuMim][Tf2N] is 50.0kcal mol-1, and that of [BuMim][BF4] is 52.5kcal mol-1, which is in good agreement with the order of  ( =20.42 J1/2 cm-3/2 for [BuMim][BF4] and  = 10.23 J1/2 cm-3/2 for [BuMim][Tf2N].55 Moreover, the relative permittivity value of [EtMim][BF4] is 12.8 and that of [BuMMim][BF4] is 13.3. This result is not in

Page 6 of 13

agreement with our common sense, that is, increasing the alkyl-chain length or the number of alkyl chains should lead to the decrease of the ILs polarity. According to the ET(30) data of these two ILs, the polarity of [EtMim][BF4] is larger than that of [BuMMim][BF4], which indicates that ET(30) can be a better polarity parameter.

Table 3. Experimental or predicted values of the relative permittivity (εr values) of solvents, the molar electronic transition energy of the longest-wavelength Vis absorption band of betaine dye no. 30 [ET(30) values], and the reaction rate for the reaction of Cl- with Methyl-p-nitrobenzenesulfonate in ILs and molecular solvents. Solvent

DCM

DMSO

[BuMPy][Tf2N]

[BuMim][Tf2N]

MeOH

k2/M-1s-1

1.07a

(9.0×10-1)a

(3.9×10-2)a

(1.2×10-2)a

(4.0×10-4)a

ET(30)

41.1b

45b

50.2c

51.5c

55.5b

εr

8.704b

46.68b

21.3d

14±0.5e

32.7b

a was obtained from reference43; b was obtained from reference130; c was obtained from reference57; d was calculated by eq.(1); e was obtained from reference48.

2.3 Prediction of polarity parameters of ILs via the modified reaction-field model Because the modified reaction field works well for IL systems, we can use this model to predict ET(30) and AN values as well as relative permittivities from one to another according to Eqs. (1), (2), and (6). The experimental and estimated values of these polarity parameters are shown in Table S2. The ET(30) values estimated by the relative permittivity of ILs are within the data range of corresponding ILs summarized by Reichardt.87 The AN values estimated by the relative permittivity of a set of ILs are also reasonable. Thus, this modified reaction field is a good model for the prediction of ET(30) and AN values with relative permittivity. Moreover, based on the data we can learn that this model is suitable to ILs, especially for less polar ILs whose predicted error is nearly 0.1 such as piperidinium and morpholinium salts. Comparing the ET(30) values predicted by ET(33) with those calculated by the modified Onsager reaction model (entries 53, 70, and 90), ET(33)’s prediction is closer to experimental values but as for entry 76 it is on the contrary. As result, using the modified Onsager reaction field model may be an excellent complementary approach to predict the ET(30) values of ILs.

Conclusions In this work, we proposed that ET(30) and AN values are more suitable to reflect the polarity of ILs, because ET(30) and AN have advantages for the measurement of ILs’ data, they can be converted into many other parameters, and they are comparable with that of molecular solvents. ET(30) and AN values cannot be only directly measured experimentally, they can also be predicted by means of the solvent’s relative permittivity. By defining the radius of the modified Onsager reaction field as the length of the first chemical bond remote from the interaction site of IL plus the radius of the probe, this semi-empirical model can be applied on a variety of IL systems. The results of correlation analysis suggest that ET(30) or AN could be estimated by relative

permittivity, which breaks the limits of application scope of these polarity scales and opens up the possibility of routine screening of ILs for a target application. Then, we used this modified Onsager reaction-field models to predict ET(30) and AN values of ILs, as a reference, both the experimental and predicted values of some polarity parameters of 240 ILs such as permittivity, ET(30) and AN values are summarized. Based on a large number of experimental and estimated values of ET(30), a unified polarity sequence of ILs sorting by cation was obtained (Scheme 6): primary, secondary, and tertiary alkylammonium salts > pyridinium salts ≈ imidazolium salts ≈ pyrrolidinium salts ≈ piperidinium salts ≈ morpholinium salts > quaternary alkylammonium salts ≈ phosphonium salts ≈ guanidinium salts. The polarities of all the ILs are larger than that of acetone. Addition of hydrogen-bond donor functional groups such as hydroxyl increases the polarity of ILs significantly, to a range between that of ethanol and water. Moreover, increasing the alkyl-chain length or the number of alkyl chains on the cations causes a slight decrease in the polarity of ILs. The polarity ranges of different kinds of cations have some overlaps, which can be ascribed to the effects of anions and substituents. These results are more in agreement with our common sense compared with relative permittivity. However, the cases of solvent polarity probes with a positive charge are not discussed in this modified model, which needs further research. Furthermore, due to the noticeable lack of data of polarity parameters, the determination of ET(30) and AN values for new ILs should be still preferential done by direct measurements if possible. Nevertheless, the proposed method for our calculation can be useful in case of probe insolubility, in case of acidic solvents (which protonate betaine dye B30), and because the number of ILs composed of a great variety of cations and anions is practically infinite. The calculated values can then help to design new ILs with the desired solvent polarity.

Computational Section The volume of probes were all calculated by using the Gaussian 09 program.135 In addition, B3LYP hybrid functional with the

6

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 7 of 13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research

6-31G basis set is used to fully optimize the molecular geometries and volumes of probes. The vibrational frequencies

have been also analysed to make sure that the optimized structures are at a minimum energy.

Scheme 6. The polarity sequence of ILs according to the ET(30) values. Y=N, P, or S, m=1, 2, 3, n=3, 2, 1.

neoteric solvents, Green Chem., 2002, 4, 73-80.

Associated Content

(5) H. Olivier-Bourbigou, L. Magna and D. Morvan, Ionic liquids and

Supporting information available: Glossary of terms of abbreviations and experimental and estimated values of ET(30) (Table S1 and S2), This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

catalysis: Recent progress from knowledge to applications, Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 2010, 373, 1-56. (6) D. M. D'Alessandro, B. Smit and J. R. Long, Carbon Dioxide Capture: Prospects for New Materials, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2010,

Author information

49, 6058-6082.

Corresponding author

(7) V. I. Parvulescu and C. Hardacre, Catalysis in ionic liquids,

*(H. Li) E-mail: [email protected]

Chem. Rev., 2007, 107, 2615-2665.

Author Contributions The manuscript was written through contributions of all authors. All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript. // these authors contributed equally.

(8)

T. Welton, Ionic liquids in catalysis, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2004,

248, 2459-2477. (9) D. B. Zhao, M. Wu, Y. Kou and E. Min, Ionic liquids: applications in catalysis, Catal. Today., 2002, 74, 157-189.

Acknowledgements

(10) S. Zhang, N. Sun, X. He, X. Lu and X. Zhang, Physical

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21573196), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities and the National High Technology Research and Development Program (863 Program) of China (Grant No. SS2015AA020601).

Ref. Data., 2006, 35, 1475-1517.

References

102, 3667-3691.

(1) U. Domanska, K. Paduszynski, M. Krolikowsi and A. Wroblewska, Separation of 2-Phenylethanol from Water by Liquid-Liquid Extraction with Ionic Liquids: New Experimental Data and Modeling with Modern Thermodynamic Tools, Ind. Eng. Chem.

(2) M. Wlazlo, J. Gawkowska and U. Domanska, Separation Based Limiting

Activity

Coefficients

(11) J. Dupont, R. F. de Souza and P. A. Z. Suarez, Ionic liquid (molten salt) phase organometallic catalysis, Chem. Rev., 2002,

(12) R. Sheldon, Catalytic reactions in ionic liquids, Chem. Commun., 2001, 2399-2407. (13) M. Antonietti, D. B. Kuang, B. Smarsly and Z. Yong, Ionic liquids for the convenient synthesis of functional nanoparticles and other inorganic nanostructures, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2004, 43,

Res., 2016, 55, 5736-5747.

on

properties of ionic liquids: database and evaluation, J. Phys. Chem.

of

Various

Solutes

in

1-Allyl-3-methylimidazolium Dicyanamide Ionic Liquid, Ind. Eng.

4988-4992. (14) Q. H. Zhang, S. G. Zhang and Y. Q. Deng, Recent advances in ionic liquid catalysis, Green Chem., 2011, 13, 2619-2637. (15) J. P. Hallett and T. Welton, Room-Temperature Ionic Liquids:

Chem. Res., 2016, 55, 5054-5062. (3) A. Rout and K. Binnemans, Solvent Extraction of Neodymium(III) by Functionalized Ionic Liquid Trioctylmethylammonium Dioctyl Diglycolamate in Fluorine-free Ionic Liquid Diluent, Ind. Eng. Chem.

Solvents for Synthesis and Catalysis. 2, Chem. Rev., 2011, 111, 3508-3576. (16) P. Zhang, Y. Gong, Y. Lv, Y. Guo, Y. Wang, C. Wang and H. Li, Ionic liquids with metal chelate anions, Chem. Commun., 2012, 48,

Res., 2014, 53, 6500-6508. (4) J. S. Wilkes, A short history of ionic liquids - from molten salts to

2334-2336.

7

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 8 of 13

(17) T. Welton, Room-temperature ionic liquids. Solvents for

1-hexyl-3-methyl-imidazolium bromide, using compressed CO2, J.

synthesis and catalysis, Chem. Rev., 1999, 99, 2071-2083.

Supercrit. Fluids., 2015, 96, 171-179.

(18) M. J. Earle and K. R. Seddon, Ionic liquids. Green solvents for

(32) S. K. Shukla and A. Kumar, Polarity issues in room temperature

the future, Pure Appl. Chem., 2000, 72, 1391-1398.

ionic liquids, Clean Technol Envir., 2015, 17, 1111-1116.

(19) P. Wasserscheid and W. Keim, Ionic liquids - New "solutions"

(33) X. Wang, K. Chen, J. Yao and H. Li, Recent progress in studies

for transition metal catalysis, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2000, 39,

on polarity of ionic liquids, Sci. China. Chem., 2016, 59, 517-525.

3772-3789.

(34) J. Y. Weng, C. M. Wang, H. R. Li and Y. Wang, Novel

(20) R. D. Rogers and K. R. Seddon, Ionic liquids--solvents of the

quaternary ammonium ionic liquids and their use as dual

future?, Science., 2003, 302, 792-793. (21)

H.

Zhang,

J.

Wu,

J.

solvent-catalysts in the hydrolytic reaction, Green Chem., 2006, 8, Zhang

and

J.

S.

He,

96-99.

1-Allyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride room temperature ionic liquid:

(35) S. Park and R. J. Kazlauskas, Improved preparation and use of

A new and powerful nonderivatizing solvent for cellulose,

room-temperature ionic liquids in lipase-catalyzed enantio- and

Macromolecules., 2005, 38, 8272-8277.

regioselective acylations, J. Org. Chem., 2001, 66, 8395-8401.

(22) M. Freemantle, Designer solvents - Ionic liquids may boost

(36) C. Chiappe, M. Malvaldi and C. S. Pomelli, Ionic liquids:

clean technology development, Chem. Eng. News., 1998, 76, 32-37.

Solvation ability and polarity, Pure Appl. Chem., 2009, 81, 767-776.

(23) C. M. Wang, W. J. Zhao, H. R. Li and L. P. Guo, Solvent-free

(37) M. Y. Lui, L. Crowhurst, J. P. Hallett, P. A. Hunt, H.

synthesis of unsaturated ketones by the Saucy-Marbet reaction

Niedermeyer and T. Welton, Salts dissolved in salts: ionic liquid

using simple ammonium ionic liquid as a catalyst, Green Chem.,

mixtures, Chemical Science., 2011, 2, 1491-1496.

2009, 11, 843-847.

(38) S. R. Tomlinson, C. W. Kehr, M. S. Lopez, J. R. Schlup and J.

(24) P. Bonhote, A. P. Dias, N. Papageorgiou, K. Kalyanasundaram

L. Anthony, Solubility of the Corn Protein Zein in Imidazolium-based

and

Ionic Liquids, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2014, 53, 2293-2298.

M.

Gratzel,

Hydrophobic,

highly

conductive

ambient-temperature molten salts, Inorg. Chem., 1996, 35,

(39) A. R. Katritzky, D. C. Fara, H. F. Yang, K. Tamm, T. Tamm and

1168-1178.

M. Karelson, Quantitative measures of solvent polarity, Chem. Rev.,

(25) N. Papaiconomou, N. Yakelis, J. Salminen, R. Bergman and J.

2004, 104, 175-198.

M. Prausnitz, Synthesis and properties of seven ionic liquids

(40) L. S. Deng, Q. Wang, Y. L. Chen, Z. F. Zhang and J. Tang,

containing

Determination

1-methyl-3-octylimidazolium

or

of

the

solubility

parameter

of

ionic

liquid

1-butyl-4-methylpyridinium cations, J. Chem. Eng. Data., 2006, 51,

1-octyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate by inverse gas

1389-1393.

chromatography, J. Mol. Liq., 2013, 187, 246-251.

(26) T. L. Greaves and C. J. Drummond, Protic ionic liquids:

(41) H. M. Luo, G. A. Baker and S. Dai, Isothermogravimetric

Properties and applications, Chem. Rev., 2008, 108, 206-237.

determination

(27) C. Chiappe and D. Pieraccini, Ionic liquids: solvent properties

1-alkyl-3-methylimidazolium ionic liquids, J. Phys. Chem. B., 2008,

and organic reactivity, J. Phys. Org. Chem., 2005, 18, 275-297.

112, 10077-10081.

(28) H. Wei, Y. Wang, J. Yao and H. Li, Empirical study of

(42) H. Jin, B. O'Hare, J. Dong, S. Arzhantsev, G. A. Baker, J. F.

physicochemical

Cu-II-containing

Wishart, A. J. Benesi and M. Maroncelli, Physical properties of ionic

chelate-based ionic liquids, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2018, 20,

liquids consisting of the 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium cation with

4109-4117.

various anions and the bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide anion with

(29) C. Reichardt, T. Welton, Solvent and Solvent Effects in Organic

various cations, J. Phys. Chem. B., 2008, 112, 81-92.

Chemistry. 4th ed., Wiley-VCH, Weinheim/Germany, 2011.

(43) L. Crowhurst, R. Falcone, N. L. Lancaster, V. Llopis-Mestre and

(30) M. A. Ab Rani, A. Brant, L. Crowhurst, A. Dolan, M. Lui, N. H.

T. Welton, Using Kamlet-Taft solvent descriptors to explain the

Hassan, J. P. Hallett, P. A. Hunt, H. Niedermeyer, J. M.

reactivity of anionic nucleophiles in ionic liquids, J. Org. Chem.,

Perez-Arlandis,

2006, 71, 8847-8853.

and

M.

spectral

Schrems,

properties

T.

Welton

of

and

R.

Wilding,

of

the

enthalpies

of

vaporization

of

Understanding the polarity of ionic liquids, Phys. Chem. Chem.

(44) L. Crowhurst, N. L. Lancaster, J. M. P. Arlandis and T. Welton,

Phys., 2011, 13, 16831-16840.

Manipulating solute nucleophilicity with room temperature ionic

(31) S. O. Nwosu, J. C. Scheicher and A. M. Scurto, Kinetics and

liquids, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 11549-11555.

polarity

(45) N. L. Lancaster, P. A. Salter, T. Welton and G. B. Young,

effects

in

the

synthesis

of

the

ionic

liquid,

8

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 9 of 13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research

Nucleophilicity in ionic liquids. 2. Cation effects on halide

solvent

nucleophilicity in a series of bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide ionic

donor-acceptor

liquids, J. Org. Chem., 2002, 67, 8855-8861.

'-bis(dimethylamino)-benzophenone and tetracyanoethene, J. Phys.

(46) N. L. Lancaster, T. Welton and G. B. Young, A study of halide

Chem. A., 2006, 110, 4937-4941.

nucleophilicity in ionic liquids, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin. Trans. 2, 2001,

(59) T. Koddermann, C. Wertz, A. Heintz and R. Ludwig, The

2267-2270.

association of water in ionic liquids: A reliable measure of polarity,

(47) H. Weingartner, The static dielectric permittivity of ionic liquids,

Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2006, 45, 3697-3702.

J. Mol. Liq., 2014, 192, 185-190.

(60) A. Kawai, T. Hidemori and K. Shibuya, Solvation of

(48) M.-M. Huang, Y. Jiang, P. Sasisanker, G. W. Driver and H.

alpha-hydroxydiphenylmethyl radical in room temperature ionic

Weingartner, Static Relative Dielectric Permittivities of Ionic Liquids

liquids studied by transient FT-EPR spectroscopy, Chem. Phys.

at 25 degrees C, J. Chem. Eng. Data., 2011, 56, 1494-1499.

Lett., 2005, 414, 378-383.

(49) G. A. Baker, A. A. Rachford, F. N. Castellano and S. N. Baker,

(61) A. Kawai, T. Hidemori and K. Shibuya, Polarity of

Ranking Solvent Interactions and Dielectric Constants with

room-temperature ionic liquid as examined by EPR spectroscopy,

Pt(mesBIAN)(tda) : A Cautionary Tale for Polarity Determinations in

Chem. Lett., 2004, 33, 1464-1465.

Ionic Liquids, ChemPhysChem., 2013, 14, 1025-1030.

(62) T. Fujisawa, M. Fukuda, M. Terazima and Y. Kimura, Raman

(50) M. M. Huang and H. Weingartner, Protic Ionic Liquids with

spectroscopic study on solvation of diphenylcyclopropenone and

Unusually High Dielectric Permittivities, ChemPhysChem., 2008, 9,

phenol blue in room temperature ionic liquids, J. Phys. Chem. A.,

2172-2173.

2006, 110, 6164-6172.

properties

using

an

unusual

complex

probe:

The

between

electron 4,4

(51) H. Weingartner, The static dielectric constant of ionic liquids, Z.

(63) P. K. Mandal and A. Samanta, Fluorescence studies in a

Phys. Chem., 2006, 220, 1395-1405.

pyrrolidinium ionic liquid: Polarity of the medium and solvation

(52) C. Daguenet, P. J. Dyson, I. Krossing, A. Oleinikova, J.

dynamics, J. Phys. Chem. B., 2005, 109, 15172-15177.

Slattery, C. Wakai and H. Weingartner, Dielectric response of

(64) A. J. Carmichael and K. R. Seddon, Polarity study of some

imidazolium-based room-temperature ionic liquids, J. Phys. Chem.

1-alkyl-3-methylimidazolium ambient-temperature ionic liquids with

B., 2006, 110, 12682-12688.

the solvatochromic dye, Nile Red, J. Phys. Org. Chem., 2000, 13,

(53) C. Wakai, A. Oleinikova, M. Ott and H. Weingartner, How polar

591-595.

are ionic liquids? Determination of the static dielectric constant of an

(65) H. Weingaertner, Understanding ionic liquids at the molecular

imidazolium-based

level: Facts, problems, and controversies, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.,

ionic

liquid

by

microwave

dielectric

spectroscopy, J. Phys. Chem. B., 2005, 109, 17028-17030.

2008, 47, 654-670.

(54) H. Weingartner, A. Knocks, W. Schrader and U. Kaatze,

(66) F. V. Bright and G. A. Baker, Comment on "How polar are ionic

Dielectric spectroscopy of the room temperature molten salt

liquids? Determination of the static dielectric constant of an

ethylammonium nitrate, J. Phys. Chem. A., 2001, 105, 8646-8650.

imidazolium-based

(55) M. Hong, R. J. Liu, H. X. Yang, W. Guan, J. Tong and J. Z.

spectroscopy", J. Phys. Chem. B., 2006, 110, 5822-5823.

Yang, Determination of the vaporisation enthalpies and estimation

(67) B. R. Knauer and J. J. Napier, Nitrogen hyperfine splitting

of the polarity for 1-alkyl-3-methylimidazolium propionate { C(n)mim

constant of nitroxide functional-group as a solvent polarity

Pro (n=2, 3)} ionic liquids, J. Chem. Thermodyn., 2014, 70, 214-218.

parameter-relative importance for a solvent polarity parameter of its

(56) M. Krueger, E. Bruendermann, S. Funkner, H. Weingaertner

being a cybotactic probe vs its being model process, J. Am. Chem.

and M. Havenith, Communications: Polarity fluctuations of the protic

Soc., 1976, 98, 4395-4400.

ionic liquid ethylammonium nitrate in the terahertz regime, J. Chem.

(68) T. C. Werner and D. B. Lyon, Empirical measures of solvent

Phys., 2010, 132, 101101.

effects on the fluorescence energy of methyl anthroates, J. Phys.

(57) C. Reichardt, Pyridinium N-phenoxide betaine dyes and their

Chem., 1982, 86, 933-939.

application to the determination of solvent polarities part 29 -

(69) C. Reichardt, Empirical parameters of the polarity of solvents,

Polarity of ionic liquids determined empirically by means of

Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 1965, 4, 29-40.

solvatochromic pyridinium N-phenolate betaine dyes, Green Chem.,

(70) R. L. Reeves, M. S. Maggio and L. F. Costa, Importance of

2005, 7, 339-351.

solvent cohesion and structure in solvent effects on binding-site

(58) C. Chiappe and D. Pieraccini, Determination of ionic liquids

probes, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1974, 96, 5917-5925.

ionic

liquid

by

microwave

dielectric

9

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 10 of 13

(71) C. Reichardt, Empirical parameters of solvent polarity as linear

liquid with various protic molecular solvents, Monatsh. Chem., 2009,

free-energy relationships, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 1979, 18,

140, 329-334.

98-110.

(84) H. Tokuda, S. Tsuzuki, M. A. B. H. Susan, K. Hayamizu and M.

(72) D. B. Smithrud and F. Diederich, Strength of molecular

Watanabe, How ionic are room-temperature ionic liquids? An

complexation of apolar solutes in water and in organic-solvents is

indicator of the physicochemical properties, J. Phys. Chem. B.,

predictable by linear free-energy relationships-a general-model for

2006, 110, 19593-19600.

solvation effects on apolar binding, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1990, 112,

(85) S. N. V. K. Aki, J. F. Brennecke and A. Samanta, How polar are

339-343.

room-temperature ionic liquids?, Chem. Commun., 2001, 413-414.

(73) V. Znamenskiy and M. N. Kobrak, Molecular dynamics study of

(86) S. K. Poole, P. H. Shetty and C. F. Poole, Chromatographic and

polarity in room-temperature ionic liquids, J. Phys. Chem. B., 2004,

spectroscopic studies of the solvent properties of a new series of

108, 1072-1079.

room-temperature liquid tetraalkylammonium sulfonates, Anal.

(74) M. J. Muldoon, C. M. Gordon and I. R. Dunkin, Investigations of

Chim. Acta, 1989, 218, 241-264.

solvent–solute interactions in room temperature ionic liquids using

(87) V. G. Machado, R. I. Stock and C. Reichardt, Pyridinium

solvatochromic dyes, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 2001,

N-Phenolate Betaine Dyes, Chem. Rev., 2014, 114, 10429-10475.

433-435.

(88) C. Reichardt, Pyridinium N-phenolate betaine dyes asempirical

(75) W. Guan, N. Chang, L. L. Yang, X. X. Bu, J. Wei and Q. S. Liu,

indicators of solvent polarity: Some new findings, Pure Appl. Chem.,

Determination and Prediction for the Polarity of Ionic Liquids, J.

2004, 76,1903-1919.

Chem. Eng. Data., 2017, 62, 2610-2616.

(89) S. Coleman, R. Byrne, S. Minkovska and D. Diamond, Thermal

(76) K. A. Fletcher, I. A. Storey, A. E. Hendricks, S. Pandey and S.

reversion of spirooxazine in ionic liquids containing the [NTf2]−

Pandey, Behavior of the solvatochromic probes Reichardt's dye,

anion, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2009, 11, 5608-5614.

pyrene, dansylamide, Nile Red and 1-pyrenecarbaldehyde within

(90)

the room-temperature ionic liquid bmimPF(6), Green Chem., 2001,

hydrogen-bond-donor strength for some ionic liquids: effect of alkyl

3, 210-215.

chain length on the pyrrolidinium cation, Chem. Phys. Lett., 2010,

(77) C. Chiappe, B. Melai, A. Sanzone and G. Valentini, Basic ionic

492, 55-59.

liquids based on monoquaternized 1,4-diazobicyclo 2.2.2 octane

(91) J. M. Lee, Solvent properties of piperidinium ionic liquids,

(dabco) and dicyanamide anion: Physicochemical and solvent

Chem. Eng. J., 2011, 172, 1066-1071.

properties, Pure Appl. Chem., 2009, 81, 2035-2043.

(92) J. N. Canongia Lopes, M. F. C. Gomes, P. Husson, A. A. H.

(78) J. L. Kaar, A. M. Jesionowski, J. A. Berberich, R. Moulton and

Padua, L. P. N. Rebelo, S. Sarraute and M. Tariq, Polarity,

A. J. Russell, Impact of ionic liquid physical properties on lipase

Viscosity, and Ionic Conductivity of Liquid Mixtures Containing

activity and stability, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 4125-4131.

C(4)C(1)im Ntf(2) and a Molecular Component, J. Phys. Chem. B.,

(79) S. K. Shukla, N. D. Khupse and A. Kumar, Do anions influence

2011, 115, 6088-6099.

the polarity of protic ionic liquids?, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2012,

(93) Y. Marcus, The properties of organic liquids that are relevant to

14, 2754-2761.

their use as solvating solvents, Chem. Soc. Rev., 1993, 22,

(80) S. V. Dzyuba and R. A. Bartsch, Expanding the polarity range

409-416.

of ionic liquids, Tetrahedron Lett., 2002, 43, 4657-4659.

(94) Y. Yoshida, O. Baba and G. Saito, Ionic liquids based on

(81) M.-L. C. Moita, A. n. F. Santos, J. o. F. Silva and I. M.

dicyanamide anion: Influence of structural variations in cationic

Lampreia, Polarity of Some [NR1R2R3R4] [Tf2N] Ionic Liquids in

structures on ionic conductivity, J. Phys. Chem. B., 2007, 111,

Ethanol: Preferential Solvation versus Solvent–Solvent Interactions,

4742-4749.

J. Chem. Eng. Data., 2012, 57, 2702-2709.

(95) J. M. Lee, S. Ruckes and J. M. Prausnitz, Solvent polarities and

(82) H. Y. Lee, J. B. Issa, S. S. Isied, E. W. Castner, Y. Pan, C. L.

Kamlet-Taft parameters for ionic liquids containing a pyridinium

Hussey, K. S. Lee and J. F. Wishart, A Comparison of

cation, J. Phys. Chem. B., 2008, 112, 1473-1476.

Electron-Transfer Dynamics in Ionic Liquids and Neutral Solvents, J.

(96)

Phys. Chem. C., 2012, 116, 5197-5208.

Thermosolvatochromic Trends in Pyridinium-, Pyrrolidinium-, and

(83) M. Khodadadi-Moghaddam, A. Habibi-Yangjeh and M. R.

Phosphonium-Based Ionic Liquids, J. Phys. Chem. B., 2010, 114,

Gholami, Solvatochromic parameters for binary mixtures of an ionic

376-381.

+



J.-M.

N.

Lee

D.

and

Khupse

J.

M.

and

Prausnitz,

A.

Kumar,

Polarity

and

Contrasting

10

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 11 of 13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research

(97) C. Chiappe, C. S. Pomelli and S. Rajamani, Influence of

J. F. Brennecke, Solvent strength of ionic liquid/CO2 mixtures,

structural variations in cationic and anionic moieties on the polarity

Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2004, 6, 3280-3285.

of ionic liquids, J. Phys. Chem. B., 2011, 115, 9653-9661.

(111) A. Sarkar, S. Trivedi, G. A. Baker and S. Pandey, Multiprobe

(98) J. L. Anderson, J. Ding, T. Welton and D. W. Armstrong,

Spectroscopic

Characterizing ionic liquids on the basis of multiple solvation

1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium Hexafluorophosphate Mixtures with

interactions, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2002, 124, 14247-14254.

Tetraethylene Glycol, J. Phys. Chem. B., 2008, 112, 14927-14936.

(99) L. Crowhurst, P. R. Mawdsley, J. M. Perez-Arlandis, P. A.

(112) B. R. Mellein, S. Aki, R. L. Ladewski and J. F. Brennecke,

Salter and T. Welton, Solvent-solute interactions in ionic liquids,

Solvatochromic studies of ionic liquid/organic mixtures, J. Phys.

Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2003, 5, 2790-2794.

Chem. B., 2007, 111, 131-138.

(100) M. N. Kobrak, The relationship between solvent polarity and

(113) S. Zhang, Z. Chen, X. Qi and Y. Deng, Distinct influence of the

molar volume in room-temperature ionic liquids, Green Chem.,

anion and ether group on the polarity of ammonium and imidazolium

2008, 10, 80-86.

ionic liquids, New J. Chem., 2012, 36, 1043-1050.

(101) Y. S. Wu, T. Sasaki, K. Kazushi, T. Seo and K. Sakurai,

(114) A. Pandey, R. Rai, M. Pal and S. Pandey, How polar are

Interactions between spiropyrans and room-temperature ionic

choline chloride-based deep eutectic solvents?, Phys. Chem.

liquids: Photochromism and solvatochromism, J. Phys. Chem. B.,

Chem. Phys., 2014, 16, 1559-1568.

2008, 112, 7530-7536.

(115) S. Bulut, P. Klose, M. M. Huang, H. Weingartner, P. J. Dyson,

(102) O. Zech, J. Hunger, J. R. Sangoro, C. Iacob, F. Kremer, W.

G. Laurenczy, C. Friedrich, J. Menz, K. Kummerer and I. Krossing,

Kunz and R. Buchner, Correlation between polarity parameters and

Synthesis of Room-Temperature Ionic Liquids with the Weakly

dielectric properties of Na TOTO -a sodium ionic liquid, Phys. Chem.

Coordinating Al(ORF)(4) (-) Anion (R-F = C(H)(CF3)(2)) and the

Chem. Phys., 2010, 12, 14341-14350.

Determination of Their Principal Physical Properties, Chem. Eur. J.,

(103) R. Klein, O. Zech, E. Maurer, M. Kellermeier and W. Kunz,

2010, 16, 13139-13154.

Oligoether carboxylates: task-specific room-temperature ionic

(116) M. Ekimova, D. Frohlich, S. Stalke, T. Lenzer and K. Oum,

liquids, J. Phys. Chem. B., 2011, 115, 8961-8969.

Probing the Local Polarity of Alkylammonium Formate Ionic Liquids

(104) R. Contreras, A. Aizman, R. A. Tapia and A. Cerda-Monje,

and Their Mixtures with Water by Using a Carbonyl Carotenoid,

Lewis

ChemPhysChem., 2012, 13, 1854-1859.

Molecular

Acidity

of

Ionic

Liquids

from

Empirical

Evidence

for

"Hyperpolarity"

within

Energy-Density Models, J. Phys. Chem. B., 2013, 117, 1911-1920.

(117) J. G. Kirkwood, Theory of Solutions of Molecules Containing

(105) K. A. Kurnia, F. Lima, A. F. M. Claudio, J. A. P. Coutinho and

Widely Separated Charges with Special Application to Zwitterions,

M. G. Freire, Hydrogen-bond acidity of ionic liquids: an extended

J. Chem. Phys., 1934, 2, 351-361.

scale, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2015, 17, 18980-18990.

(118) L. Onsager, Electric moments of molecules in liquids, J. Am.

(106) A. Dolan, D. A. Sherman, R. Atkin and G. G. Warr,

Chem. Soc., 1936, 58, 1486-1493.

Kamlet-Taft Solvation Parameters of Solvate Ionic Liquids,

(119) H. Jin, G. A. Baker, S. Arzhantsev, J. Dong and M. Maroncelli,

ChemPhysChem., 2016, 17, 3096-3101.

Solvation and rotational dynamics of coumarin 153 in ionic liquids:

(107) A. Jeličić, N. García, H.-G. Löhmannsröben and S.

Comparisons to conventional solvents, J. Phys. Chem. B., 2007,

Beuermann, Prediction of the Ionic Liquid Influence on Propagation

111, 7291-7302.

Rate Coefficients in Methyl Methacrylate Radical Polymerizations

(120) E. Zottler and G. Gescheidt, Nitroxides: versatile reporters and

Based

reactants, J. Chem. Res., 2011, 257-267.

on

Kamlet−Taft

Solvatochromic

Parameters,

Macromolecules., 2009, 42, 8801-8808.

(121) Y. Akdogan, J. Heller, H. Zimmermann and D. Hinderberger,

(108) R. Karmakar and A. Samanta, Solvation dynamics of

The solvation of nitroxide radicals in ionic liquids studied by

coumarin-153 in a room-temperature ionic liquid, J. Phys. Chem. A.,

high-field EPR spectroscopy, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2010, 12,

2002, 106, 4447-4452.

7874-7882.

(109) E. B. Tada, L. P. Novaki and O. A. El Seoud, Solvatochromism

(122) B. Y. Mladenova, D. R. Kattnig and G. Grampp,

in pure and binary solvent mixtures: effects of the molecular

Room-Temperature Ionic Liquids Discerned Via Nitroxyl Spin Probe

structure of the zwitterionic probe, J. Phys. Org. Chem., 2000, 13,

Dynamics, J. Phys. Chem. B., 2011, 115, 8183-8198.

679-687.

(123) S. G. Zhang, X. J. Qi, X. Y. Ma, L. J. Lu and Y. Q. Deng,

(110) C. P. Fredlake, M. J. Muldoon, S. N. V. K. Aki, T. Welton and

Hydroxyl Ionic Liquids: The Differentiating Effect of Hydroxyl on

11

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 12 of 13

Polarity due to Ionic Hydrogen Bonds between Hydroxyl and

and I. R. Dunkin, Ionic liquids: polar, but weakly coordinating

Anions, J. Phys. Chem. B., 2010, 114, 3912-3920.

solvents for the first biphasic oligomerisation of ethene to higher

(124) I. M. Herfort and H. Schneider, Spectroscopic studies of the

α-olefins with cationic Ni complexes, Chem. Commun., 2001,

solvent polarities of room-temperature liquid ethylammonium nitrate

1186-1187.

and its mixtures with polar solvents, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 1991, 1991,

(130) X. Y. Wang, R. N. Dao, J. Yao, D. Peng and H. R. Li,

27-31.

Modification of the Onsager Reaction Field and Its Application on

(125) S. Ding, L. G. Wei, K. L. Li and Y. C. Ma, Solvatochromic

Spectral Parameters, ChemPhysChem., 2017, 18, 763-771.

Parameters and Preferential Solvation Behavior for Binary Mixtures

(131) D. Abrams and J. Prausnitz, Statistical Thermodynamics of

of 1,3-Dialkylimidazolium Ionic Liquids with Water, Acta Phys. Chim.

Liquid Mixtures: A New Expression for the Excess Gibbs Energy of

Sin., 2016, 29, 497-507.

Partly or Completely Miscible Systems, AlChE J., 1975, 21,

(126) M. G. Bogdanov, I. Svinyarov, H. Kunkel, C. Steinle, M.

116-128.

Arkhipova, W. Kantlehner and G. Maas, Empirical Polarity

(132) V. Strehmel, Radicals in ionic liquids, ChemPhysChem., 2012,

Parameters for Hexaalkylguanidinium-based Room-temperature

13, 1649-1663.

Ionic Liquids, Z. Naturforsch. B., 2010, 65, 791-797.

(133) V. Strehmel, H. Rexhausen, P. Strauch, E. Görnitz and B.

(127) W. B. Harrod and N. J. Pienta, Solvent polarity scales. 1.

Strehmel, Temperature Dependence of Interactions between Stable

Determination of ET and π* values for phosphonium and ammonium

Piperidine

melts, J. Phys. Org. Chem., 1990, 3, 534–544.

ChemPhysChem., 2008, 9, 1294-1302.

(128) C. Reichardt and E. Harbusch ‐Görnert, Über Pyridinium ‐N

(134) Dortmund Data Bank DDBST GmbH. Available via the

‐phenolat

‐Betaine und ihre Verwendung zur Charakterisierung

‐1

‐yloxyl Derivatives and an Ionic Liquid,

Internet at www.ddbst.de.

der Polarität von Lösungsmitteln, X. Erweiterung, Korrektur und

(135) M. Frisch, G. Trucks, H. Schlegel, G. Scuseria, M. Robb, J.

Neudefinition der ET ‐Lösungsmittelpolaritätsskala mit Hilfe eines

Cheeseman, G. Scalmani, V. Barone, B. Mennucci and G.

lipophilen penta ‐tert ‐butyl ‐substituierten Pyridinium ‐N ‐

Petersson, Gaussian 09 Revision D. 01, 2009, Gaussian Inc.

phenolat‐Betainfarbstoffes, Liebigs Ann. Chem., 1983, 721-743.

Wallingford CT, 2009.

(129) P. Wasserscheid, C. Hilgers, C. M. Gordon, M. J. Muldoon

12

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 13 of 13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research

Table of Contents

13

ACS Paragon Plus Environment