Subscriber access provided by NEW YORK MED COLL
Article
Uptake of Gold Nanoparticles by Intestinal Epithelial Cells: Impact of Particle Size on their Absorption, Accumulation, and Toxicity Mingfei Yao, Lili He, David Julian McClements, and Hang Xiao J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.5b03242 • Publication Date (Web): 27 Aug 2015 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on August 28, 2015
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 30
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
1
Uptake of Gold Nanoparticles by Intestinal Epithelial Cells: Impact of
2
Particle Size on their Absorption, Accumulation, and Toxicity
3
Mingfei Yao †, Lili He†, David Julian McClements†, §, Hang Xiao*, †, ‡
4
†
Department of Food Science, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA
5
‡
College of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha,
6
Hunan, P. R. China
7
§
8
Saudi Arabia
Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah,
9
10
11 12
*Address correspondence to
[email protected]; Tel: 413 545 2281; Fax 413 545 1262
13
14
15
16
1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
17
18
ABSTRACT Inorganic nanomaterials have been increasingly utilized in many consumer products,
19
which has led to concerns about their potential toxicity.
At present, there is limited
20
knowledge about the gastrointestinal fate and cytotoxicity of ingested inorganic
21
nanoparticles. In this study, we determined the influence of particle size and
22
concentration of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) on their absorption, accumulation and
23
cytotoxicity in model intestinal epithelial cells. As the mean particle diameter of the
24
AuNPs decreased (from 100 to 50 to 15 nm) their rate of absorption by the intestinal
25
epithelium cells increased, but their cellular accumulation in the epithelial cells decreased.
26
Moreover, accumulation of AuNPs caused cytotoxicity in the intestinal epithelial cells,
27
which was evidenced by depolarization of mitochondria membranes. These results
28
provide important insights into the relationship between the dimensions of AuNPs and
29
their gastrointestinal uptake and potential cytotoxicity.
30 31
Keywords: Gold nanoparticles; absorption; accumulation; toxicity; intestinal epithelial
32
cells; particle size: mitochondria potential.
33 34
2 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 2 of 30
Page 3 of 30
35
36
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
INTRODUCTION Developments in the nanotechnology field during the past decade or so have led to
37
numerous applications of nanomaterial, such as in computer science, chemistry,
38
cosmetics, agrochemicals, and pharmaceuticals 1, 2. Nanotechnology has also been
39
utilized within the food industry to improve the microbiological safety, sensory attributes,
40
nutrition value, and shelf life of foods, as well as to develop innovative sensors to
41
monitor food quality and safety 3-5.
42
inorganic nanoparticles have been found in a wide range of food products, including the
43
nanoparticles based on silver, titanium dioxide, silica, zinc oxide, etc. 6.
44
nanoparticles may be intentionally added to food products as additives because of their
45
specific functional attributes (such as antimicrobial, whitening, or anticaking agents), or
46
they may be unintentionally added to foods (e.g., as a contaminant in an additive that is
47
supposed to contain larger particles).
48
nanoparticles within food products means that humans come into contact with them more
49
frequently 7. Hence, it is particularly important to establish whether there are any adverse
50
effects of ingesting inorganic nanoparticles in foods on human health, especially since
51
nanoparticles may have completely different absorption and toxicity patterns in
52
comparison to the larger particles.
53
Consequently, various types of nanomaterial such as
These
The increasing prevalence of inorganic
A number of studies suggest that ingestion of inorganic nanoparticles may have toxic 3 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
54
effects. It has been reported that ingestion of nanomaterials may promote inflammatory
55
bowel disease, DNA fragmentation, liver damage and pregnancy complications, as well
56
as result in abnormal intestinal barrier function and increased intestinal permeability. 8-11.
57
In particular, prolonged exposure to inorganic nanoparticles may have a detrimental
58
impact on the function of the intestinal membrane 12. However, detailed information
59
about the gastrointestinal uptake and cytotoxicity of ingested inorganic nanoparticles is
60
currently unavailable, and more studies are needed in this important area.
61
Gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) have been widely used in the studies of the biological
62
fate and toxicity of inorganic nanoparticles because of their ease of synthesis, high
63
chemical stability, and unique optical properties 13, 14. Commercially, the main
64
applications of AuNPs are in the medical field, such as for drug delivery and
65
photodynamic therapy. However, AuNPs have also been used in cosmetics, beverages,
66
food packaging materials, and toothpastes, which leads to oral exposure of AuNPs in
67
humans 14-16. However, a review on the previous studies highlighted the current poor
68
understanding of the gastrointestinal uptake and potential cytotoxicity of AuNPs 17.
69
Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine the effect of nanoparticle size and
70
concentration on the intestinal absorption and cellular accumulation of AuNPs in the
71
model intestinal epithelial cells, and to assess the potential toxicity caused by the
72
exposure to AuNPs. 4 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 4 of 30
Page 5 of 30
73
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Differentiated human intestinal cells (Caco-2 cells) can be grown on a permeable
74
support to form a model intestinal epithelial monolayer. This model system can be used
75
to carry out systematic studies of the impact of nanoparticle characteristics (such as size,
76
surface chemistry, and concentration) on cellular responses such as absorption and
77
toxicity 12, 18.
78
by or transported across this type of epithelial monolayer 15. In this study, we utilized this
79
model to determine the influence of AuNPs dimensions (15 nm, 50, or 100 nm) on their
80
absorption, accumulation, and toxicity. The results of this study are important for
81
understanding the gastrointestinal fate of inorganic nanoparticles that may be ingested.
82
MATERIALS AND METHODS
83
Materials
Previous studies have shown that different nanoparticles can be absorbed
84
The following products were purchased from SigmaAldrich Chemicals (St. Louis,
85
MO, USA): 4% osmium tetroxide (OsO4), phosphatungstic acid (PTA), nitric acid, and
86
hydrochloric acid. AuNPs with different diameters (15, 50, and 100 nm) were purchased
87
from NanopartzTM (Loveland, CO). A mitochondrial membrane potential probe (JC-1 dye)
88
was purchased from Life Technologies (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Agawam, MA, USA).
89
Hank’s balanced salt solution, glutaraldehyde , cacodylate, formvar/carbon Cu grids 200
90
mesh, epoxy resin were purchased from EM Sciences (Hatfield, PA, USA).
5 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
91
92
Cell culture
Caco-2 cells (passage 55~65) were cultured in complete Dulbecco’s modified
93
essential medium (DMEM) containing high glucose, 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 1%
94
antibiotic, and 1% amino acids as we described previously 19. Cells were seeded at 3×105
95
cells/mL on transwells (Corning Inc., MA, USA) containing polyester filters (3 m pore
96
size and 4.7 cm2 surface area) and grown for 21 days. The transepithelial electrical
97
resistance (TEER) was monitored using a Millicell® ERS-2 epithelial voltammeter
98
(World Precision Instruments, Sarasota, FL). The TEER data is presented as resistance
99
per unit surface area Ω×cm2.
100
101
Transmission electron microscopy analysis
To visualize the AuNPs, a drop of liquid sample was allowed to air-dry onto a
102
carbon-coated 200 mesh copper grid, and then the sample was stained with 2% PTA.
103
Samples were visualized with a transmission electron microscope (TecaniTM 12 TEM,
104
FEI Company, Hillsboro, OR, USA). To visualize the uptake of AuNPs in intestinal
105
epithelial cells, suspensions of AuNPs (5 µg/mL, 15, 50, or 100 nm) were applied on
106
Caco-2 cell monolayers. After treatment for 0.5 h, 1 h, 2 h, 4 h, 8 h and 24 h, the media in
107
both the apical and basolateral sides were removed and the monolayers were rinsed with
108
Hank’s balanced salt solution (HBSS) that had been warmed to 37 ºC. The monolayers
6 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 6 of 30
Page 7 of 30
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
109
were immediately fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde and 2% paraformaldehyde (0.1 M
110
sodium cacodylate buffer, pH 7.4) for 2 h at 37 ºC. They were then post-fixed in 1%
111
aqueous osmium tetroxide solution and then embedded in Epoxy resin. Thin sections
112
were obtained using an ultramicrotome with a diamond knife (DDK, Wilmington, DE).
113
The sections were stained with uranyl acetate followed by lead citrate. The image
114
samples were then viewed with the transmission electron microscope (TecaniTM 12, FEI
115
Company, Hillsboro, OR, USA).
116
ICP-MS analysis
117
After treatment with AuNPs, the cell monolayers and medium samples were
118
collected at the specific time period from the apical and basolateral sides of the transwell
119
as described above. A bicinchoninic acid (BCA) kit was used to quantify the protein
120
concentration of the monolayers in each well. Each sample was mixed with 0.5 mL of
121
aqua regia and then the sample was diluted to 10 mL with de-ionized water. A series of
122
standard solutions of Au were prepared under the same conditions. Inductively coupled
123
plasma (ICP) mass spectrometry (MS) measurements were performed on a mass
124
spectrometer (NexION 300X ICP, PerkinElmer, Cambridge, MA).
125
Calculation of number of gold nanoparticles
126
The number of gold nanoparticles in a given sample was calculated from the Au 7 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
127
concentration measured by ICP-MS. The number of gold atoms per gold nanoparticle (n)
128
can be estimated from the following expression 20:
=
129
Where, D is the diameter of a gold nanoparticle and d is the diameter of a single gold
130
atom, which is approximately 0.28 nm 21.
131
calculated from the measured Au concentration as follows:
=
Hence, the number of AuNPs can be
×
132
Where Cn = the number of AuNPs per unit volume, Cm = the measured mass of Au per
133
unit volume, and NA is Avogadro’s constant.
134
Determination of mitochondrial membrane potential
135
Aqueous suspensions of AuNPs (5 µg /mL, 15, 50, or 100 nm) were applied on to
136
well-differentiated Caco-2 monolayer (TEER > 200 Ω). Four hours after the treatment,
137
the apical and basolateral media were removed and the monolayers were rinsed three
138
times with warmed HBSS. A medium containing 10 µg/mL of JC-1 (mitochondrial
139
membrane potential probe) in warmed DMEM solution was added to the Caco-2 cell
140
monolayers. After the incubation for 15 minutes (37 ºC, 5% carbon dioxide, and 100%
141
humidity), the monolayers were washed twice with HBSS, placed onto a microscope 8 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 8 of 30
Page 9 of 30
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
142
slide.
143
sealed and stored overnight at 4 ºC. The microstructure of the samples was observed
144
using a confocal fluorescent microscope (Olympus FV-1000, Waltham, MA). The JC-1
145
treated coverslips were excited at 488 nm, and the emission was recorded simultaneously
146
at 527 and 590 nm by independent detectors 22. Two-photon excitation of JC-1 labeled
147
Caco-2 cell monolayers allowed for the real-time analysis of mitochondria membrane
148
potential. The data were analyzed using the following expression as described
149
previously23:
150
After adding a fluorescent dye (DAPI) to the samples, the slides were rapidly
Ratio = 5 × Ired/Igreen
151
Here Ired and Igreen are the intensities of the signals in the red and green regions of the
152
spectra.
153
256 levels.
154
Statistical Analysis
155
The factor “5” is used to transform the ratiometric results into an 8-bit scale of
All values are expressed as means ± standard deviations (SD) unless stated otherwise.
156
The difference among samples were analyzed by ANOVA with significance level of p
50 nm > 15 nm (Figure
306
4A).
307 308
Quantification of the ratio of red/green florescence further
In summary, the absorption, accumulation, and transfer of AuNPs in the intestinal epithelial cells were highly dependent on their particle diameter (15, 50 or 100 nm). 17 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
309
AuNPs with intermediate sizes (50 nm) were the most efficiently transported across the
310
intestinal epithelium: uptaken from the apical side and excreted into the basolateral side.
311
The smaller AuNPs (15 nm) were more rapidly absorbed by the intestinal epithelial cells
312
and more quickly spread throughout the interior of the cells.
313
AuNPs (100 nm) tended to accumulate within the intestinal epithelial cells since their rate
314
of excretion into the basolateral side was slow. The increasing accumulation of the total
315
mass of gold caused by AuNPs resulted in increasing mitochondria toxicity to the
316
intestinal epithelial cells. Overall, this study provided detailed information on the impact
317
of particle size on the absorption, accumulation and cytotoxicity of AuNPs in the
318
intestinal epithelium.
Conversely, the larger
319 320 321
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This study was partially supported by grants from United States Department of
322
Agriculture.
323
REFERENCES
324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337
(1) Yun, Y.; Cho, Y. W.; Park, K., Nanoparticles for oral delivery: Targeted nanoparticles with peptidic ligands for oral protein delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2013, 65, 822-832. (2) Fisichella, M.; Berenguer, F.; Steinmetz, G.; Auffan, M.; Rose, J.; Prat, O., Intestinal toxicity evaluation of TiO2 degraded surface-treated nanoparticles: a combined physico-chemical and toxicogenomics approach in caco-2 cells. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2012, 9. (3) Chaudhry, Q.; Scotter, M.; Blackburn, J.; Ross, B.; Boxall, A.; Castle, L.; Aitken, R.; Watkins, R., Applications and implications of nanotechnologies for the food sector. Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo & Risk Assess. 2008, 25, 241-258. (4) Duncan, T. V., Applications of nanotechnology in food packaging and food safety: Barrier materials, antimicrobials and sensors. J Colloid Inter Sci. 2011, 363, 1-24. (5) Weiss, J.; McClements, D. J.; Takhistov, P., Functional materials in food nanotechnology. Food Australia. 2007, 59, 274-275. (6) Wang, H. F.; Du, L. J.; Song, Z. M.; Chen, X. X., Progress in the characterization and 18 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 18 of 30
Page 19 of 30
338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
safety evaluation of engineered inorganic nanomaterials in food. Nanomedicine-Uk. 2013, 8, 2007-2025. (7) Abbott, L. C.; Maynard, A. D., Exposure Assessment Approaches for Engineered Nanomaterials. Risk Anal. 2010, 30, 1634-1644. (8) Weber, C. R.; Nalle, S. C.; Tretiakova, M.; Rubin, D. T.; Turner, J. R., Claudin-1 and claudin-2 expression is elevated in inflammatory bowel disease and may contribute to early neoplastic transformation. Lab Invest. 2008, 88, 1110-1120. (9) Yamashita, K.; Yoshioka, Y.; Higashisaka, K.; Mimura, K.; Morishita, Y.; Nozaki, M.; Yoshida, T.; Ogura, T.; Nabeshi, H.; Nagano, K.; Abe, Y.; Kamada, H.; Monobe, Y.; Imazawa, T.; Aoshima, H.; Shishido, K.; Kawai, Y.; Mayumi, T.; Tsunoda, S.; Itoh, N.; Yoshikawa, T.; Yanagihara, I.; Saito, S.; Tsutsumi, Y., Silica and titanium dioxide nanoparticles cause pregnancy complications in mice. Nat Nanotechnol. 2011, 6, 321-8. (10) Lagopati, N.; Tsilibary, E. P.; Falaras, P.; Papazafiri, P.; Pavlatou, E. A.; Kotsopoulou, E.; Kitsiou, P., Effect of nanostructured TiO(2) crystal phase on photoinduced apoptosis of breast cancer epithelial cells. Int J Nanomedicine. 2014, 9, 3219-30. (11) Wang, J.; Zhou, G.; Chen, C.; Yu, H.; Wang, T.; Ma, Y.; Jia, G.; Gao, Y.; Li, B.; Sun, J.; Li, Y.; Jiao, F.; Zhao, Y.; Chai, Z., Acute toxicity and biodistribution of different sized titanium dioxide particles in mice after oral administration. Toxicol lett. 2007, 168, 176-85. (12) Thubagere, A.; Reinhard, B. M., Nanoparticle-Induced Apoptosis Propagates through Hydrogen-Peroxide-Mediated Bystander Killing: Insights from a Human Intestinal Epithelium In Vitro Model. Acs Nano. 2010, 4, 3611-3622. (13) Liang, M.; Lin, I. C.; Whittaker, M. R.; Minchin, R. F.; Monteiro, M. J.; Toth, I., Cellular Uptake of Densely Packed Polymer Coatings on Gold Nanoparticles. Acs Nano. 2010, 4, 403-413. (14) Ghosh, P.; Han, G.; De, M.; Kim, C. K.; Rotello, V. M., Gold nanoparticles in delivery applications. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2008, 60, 1307-15. (15) Frohlich, E.; Roblegg, E., Models for oral uptake of nanoparticles in consumer products. Toxicology. 2012, 291, 10-7. (16) El-Sayed, I. H.; Huang, X.; El-Sayed, M. A., Surface plasmon resonance scattering and absorption of anti-EGFR antibody conjugated gold nanoparticles in cancer diagnostics: applications in oral cancer. Nano lett. 2005, 5, 829-34. (17) Dykman, L. A.; Khlebtsov, N. G., Uptake of Engineered Gold Nanoparticles into Mammalian Cells. Chem Rev. 2014, 114, 1258-1288. (18) Hubatsch, I.; Ragnarsson, E. G. E.; Artursson, P., Determination of drug permeability and prediction of drug absorption in Caco-2 monolayers. Nat Protoc. 2007, 2, 2111-2119. (19) Yao, M. F.; Chen, J. J.; Zheng, J. K.; Song, M. Y.; McClements, D. J.; Xiao, H., Enhanced lymphatic transport of bioactive lipids: cell culture study of polymethoxyflavone incorporation into chylomicrons. Food Funct. 2013, 4, 1662-1667. 19 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415
(20) Gu, Y. J.; Cheng, J. P.; Lin, C. C.; Lam, Y. W.; Cheng, S. H.; Wong, W. T., Nuclear penetration of surface functionalized gold nanoparticles. Toxicol Appl Pharm. 2009, 237, 196-204. (21) Coulter, J. A.; Jain, S.; Butterworth, K. T.; Taggart, L. E.; Dickson, G. R.; McMahon, S. J.; Hyland, W. B.; Muir, M. F.; Trainor, C.; Hounsell, A. R.; O'Sullivan, J. M.; Schettino, G.; Currell, F. J.; Hirst, D. G.; Prise, K. M., Cell type-dependent uptake, localization, and cytotoxicity of 1.9 nm gold nanoparticles. Int J Nanomed. 2012, 7, 2673-2685. (22) Wadia, J. S.; Chalmers-Redman, R. M. E.; Ju, W. J. H.; Carlile, G. W.; Phillips, J. L.; Fraser, A. D.; Tatton, W. G., Mitochondrial membrane potential and nuclear changes in apoptosis caused by serum and nerve growth factor withdrawal: Time course and modification by (-)-deprenyl. J Neurosci. 1998, 18, 932-947. (23) Keil, V. C.; Funke, F.; Zeug, A.; Schild, D.; Muller, M., Ratiometric high-resolution imaging of JC-1 fluorescence reveals the subcellular heterogeneity of astrocytic mitochondria. Pflug Arch Eur J Phy. 2011, 462, 693-708. (24) Polte, J.; Ahner, T. T.; Delissen, F.; Sokolov, S.; Emmerling, F.; Thunemann, A. F.; Kraehnert, R., Mechanism of gold nanoparticle formation in the classical citrate synthesis method derived from coupled in situ XANES and SAXS evaluation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 1296-301. (25) Datta, S. R.; Brunet, A.; Greenberg, M. E., Cellular survival: a play in three Akts. Genes Dev. 1999, 13, 2905-27. (26) Jiang, W.; Kim, B. Y. S.; Rutka, J. T.; Chan, W. C. W., Nanoparticle-mediated cellular response is size-dependent. Nat Nanotechnol. 2008, 3, 145-150. (27) Nel, A. E.; Madler, L.; Velegol, D.; Xia, T.; Hoek, E. M. V.; Somasundaran, P.; Klaessig, F.; Castranova, V.; Thompson, M., Understanding biophysicochemical interactions at the nano-bio interface. Nat Mater. 2009, 8, 543-557. (28) Yang, P. H.; Sun, X. S.; Chiu, J. F.; Sun, H. Z.; He, Q. Y., Transferrin-mediated gold nanoparticle cellular uptake. Bioconjugate Chem. 2005, 16, 494-496. (29) Wang, S. H.; Lee, C. W.; Chiou, A.; Wei, P. K., Size-dependent endocytosis of gold nanoparticles studied by three-dimensional mapping of plasmonic scattering images. J Nanobiotechnology. 2010, 8, 33. (30) Sonavane, G.; Tomoda, K.; Sano, A.; Ohshima, H.; Terada, H.; Makino, K., In vitro permeation of gold nanoparticles through rat skin and rat intestine: Effect of particle size. Colloid Surf B. 2008, 65, 1-10. (31) Bajak, E.; Fabbri, M.; Ponti, J.; Gioria, S.; Ojea-Jimenez, I.; Collotta, A.; Mariani, V.; Gilliland, D.; Rossi, F.; Gribaldo, L., Changes in Caco-2 cells transcriptome profiles upon exposure to gold nanoparticles. Toxicol Lett. 2015, 233, 187-199. (32) Taggart, L. E.; McMahon, S. J.; Currell, F. J.; Prise, K. M.; Butterworth, K. T., The role of mitochondrial function in gold nanoparticle mediated radiosensitisation. Cancer 20 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 20 of 30
Page 21 of 30
416 417 418 419 420 421 422
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Nanotechnol. 2014, 5, 5. (33) Wang, L. M.; Liu, Y.; Li, W.; Jiang, X. M.; Ji, Y. L.; Wu, X. C.; Xu, L. G.; Qiu, Y.; Zhao, K.; Wei, T. T.; Li, Y. F.; Zhao, Y. L.; Chen, C. Y., Selective Targeting of Gold Nanorods at the Mitochondria of Cancer Cells: Implications for Cancer Therapy. Nano lett. 2011, 11, 772-780.
Figure Captions
423
Figure 1. Morphology of the initial gold nanoparticle suspensions (nominal diameters of
424
15, 50 and 100 nm) used in this study. All images were taken under transmission electron
425
microscopy as described in the Method.
426
Figure 2. The absorption of AuNPs by intestinal epithelial cells. Caco-2 cell monolayers
427
were incubated with AuNPs (15 nm, 50 nm, or 100 nm) for various time periods (up to 24
428
hour). After thorough wash, Caco-2 cell monolayers were processed for TEM
429
(transmission electron microscope) analysis to visualize AuNPs absorbed by the cells.
430
AuNPs are highlighted by the circles. Arrows indicate the direction from apical to
431
basolateral side across microvilli. Different magnifications were used in different images.
432
Scale bar represent 500 nm. Representative images were selected from replicates of at
433
least 3.
434
Figure 3. Transport of AuNPs across intestinal epithelium. Change in the concentration of
435
gold measured in the basolateral compartment after incubating Caco-2 cell monolayers
436
with AuNPs in the apical compartment of the transwells.
437
different concentrations of gold nanoparticles were used (shown in figure): 2.5, 5 and 10
438
µg/mL in the apical medium.
439
Figure 4.
440
amount of gold measured in the Caco-2 monolayers after incubating Caco-2 cell
Suspensions containing
Accumulation of AuNPs within the intestinal epithelium. Change in the
21 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
441
monolayers with 5 µg/mL of AuNPs in the apical compartment of the transwells.
442
Amount of gold was expressed as either particle mass (A) or particle number (B) in the
443
Caco-2 cell monolayer.
444
Figure 5. The effects of AuNPs on the mitochondrial membrane potentials of intestinal
445
epithelial cells.
446
100 nm) for 4h separately. Mitochondria toxicity of AuNPs was visualized by confocal
447
microscope using a red fluorescent dye JC-1 (A). JC-1 exhibits potential-dependent
448
accumulation in mitochondria, indicated by a fluorescence emission shift from green to
449
red.
450
of dye aggregates that fluoresce red, whereas cells with low mitochondria membrane
451
potential (damaged) remain monomeric JC-1 that fluoresce green. The red/green ratio
452
was quantified using image J (B). Representative images were selected from replicates of
453
3. Different letters indicate statistical difference among the three groups at the given time
454
point (P