Dual Carbon–Chlorine Isotope Analysis Indicates Distinct Anaerobic

Jul 5, 2018 - School of Engineering, University of Guelph, Guelph , Ontario N1G 2W1 ... School of Biology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta , ...
0 downloads 0 Views 9MB Size
Subscriber access provided by Technical University of Munich University Library

Remediation and Control Technologies

Dual carbon-chlorine isotope analysis indicates distinct anaerobic dichloromethane degradation pathways in two members of the Peptococcaceae Gao Chen, Orfan Shouakar-Stash, Elizabeth Phillips, Shandra D. Justicia-Leon, Tetyana Gilevska, Barbara Sherwood Lollar, Elizabeth Erin Mack, Edward S. Seger, and Frank E Löffler Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b01583 • Publication Date (Web): 05 Jul 2018 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on July 7, 2018

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 34

Environmental Science & Technology

1

Dual carbon-chlorine isotope analysis indicates distinct anaerobic dichloromethane

2

degradation pathways in two members of the Peptococcaceae

3

Gao Chen,† Orfan Shouakar-Stash,§,‡,Ω Elizabeth Phillips,# Shandra D. Justicia-Leon,◊,ǁ Tetyana

4

Gilevska,# Barbara Sherwood Lollar,#,* E. Erin Mack,⊥ Edward S. Seger,∆ and Frank E.

5

Löffler†,∏,∇,*

6



7

and Department of Microbiology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA

8

§

9



Center for Environmental Biotechnology, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering,

Isotope Tracer Technologies Inc. (IT2), Waterloo, Ontario N2V 1Z5, Canada Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario

10

N2L 3G1, Canada

11



12

#

13



14



15

DE 19805, USA

16



17



18

Biological Sciences (JIBS) and Biosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak

19

Ridge, TN 37831, USA

20



21

TN 37996, USA

School of Engineering, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada

Department of Earth Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 3B1, Canada

School of Biology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA DuPont Corporate Remediation Group, E. I. DuPont de Nemours and Company, Wilmington,

The Chemours Company, Wilmington, DE 19899, USA University of Tennessee and Oak Ridge National Laboratory (UT-ORNL) Joint Institute for

Department of Biosystems Engineering and Soil Science, University of Tennessee, Knoxville,

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

1

Environmental Science & Technology

22

*Corresponding authors

23

Frank E. Löffler

Barbara Sherwood Lollar

24

University of Tennessee

University of Toronto

25

Department of Microbiology

Department of Earth Sciences

26

M409 Walters Life Science Bldg.

22 Russell St.

27

Knoxville, TN 37996, USA

Toronto, ON M5S 3B1, Canada

28

Phone: (865) 974-4933

Phone: (416) 978-0770

29

Fax: (865) 974-4007

Fax: (416) 978-3938

30

E-mail: [email protected]

E-mail: [email protected]

Page 2 of 34

31 32

Running title: Carbon and chlorine fractionation during anaerobic DCM degradation

33 34

Keywords: dichloromethane, dual C-Cl isotope fractionation, anaerobic degradation, pathways,

35

Peptococcaceae family

36 37

ǁ

38

00968

Current address: 48 City View Plaza I, Suite 401, Road 165 Km 1.2, Guaynabo, Puerto Rico,

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

2

Page 3 of 34

Environmental Science & Technology

39

Abstract

40

Dichloromethane (DCM) is a probable human carcinogen and frequent groundwater

41

contaminant, and contributes to stratospheric ozone layer depletion. DCM is degraded by

42

aerobes harboring glutathione-dependent DCM dehalogenases; however, DCM contamination

43

occurs in oxygen-deprived environments and much less is known about anaerobic DCM

44

metabolism. Some members of the Peptococcaceae family convert DCM to environmentally

45

benign products including acetate, formate, hydrogen (H2), and inorganic chloride under strictly

46

anoxic conditions. The current study applied stable carbon and chlorine isotope fractionation

47

measurements to the axenic culture Dehalobacterium formicoaceticum and to the consortium

48

RM comprising the DCM degrader Candidatus Dichloromethanomonas elyunquensis.

49

Degradation-associated carbon and chlorine isotope enrichment factors (εC and εCl) of –42.4 ±

50

0.7‰ and –5.3 ± 0.1‰, respectively, were measured in D. formicoaceticum cultures. A similar

51

εCl of –5.2 ± 0.1‰, but a substantially lower εC of –18.3 ± 0.2‰, were determined for Ca.

52

Dichloromethanomonas elyunquensis. The εC and εCl values resulted in distinctly different dual

53

element C-Cl isotope correlations (ΛC/Cl = ∆δ13C / ∆δ37Cl) of 7.89 ± 0.12 and 3.40 ± 0.03 for D.

54

formicoaceticum and Ca. Dichloromethanomonas elyunquensis, respectively. The distinct ΛC/Cl

55

values obtained for the two cultures imply mechanistically distinct C-Cl bond cleavage reactions,

56

suggesting that members of Peptococcaceae employ different pathways to metabolize DCM.

57

These findings emphasize the utility of dual carbon-chlorine isotope analysis to pinpoint DCM

58

degradation mechanisms, and to provide an additional line of evidence that detoxification is

59

occurring at DCM-contaminated sites.

60 61

Introduction

62

Substantial amounts of dichloromethane (DCM) are produced naturally in the oceans, wetlands,

63

and soils, or through volcanic activity and emissions; however, the majority of DCM

64

contamination in aquifers is due to anthropogenic activities.1 DCM is an excellent solvent, and

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

3

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 4 of 34

65

has been widely used as paint remover, dry-cleaning solvent, and degreasing agent in

66

electronics, manufacturing, and machine maintenance industries.2 As a legacy of extensive

67

usage, as well as improper handling and storage, DCM is commonly detected in subsurface

68

environments, and in groundwater and drinking-water supply wells in the United States (U.S.).3

69

DCM was measured in groundwater samples taken throughout the contiguous U.S. in

70

concentrations ranging from 0.02 to 100 µg L–1 with a detection frequency of 3%.4 The U.S.

71

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) catalogs DCM as a probable human carcinogen and

72

has classified DCM as a priority contaminant with a maximum contaminant level (MCL) in

73

drinking water of 5 µg L–1 (ppb).5,6 In addition, DCM causes ozone layer depletion and is an

74

increasing threat to stratospheric ozone.7

75

DCM degradation under oxic and nitrate-reducing conditions is mediated by aerobes and

76

facultative bacteria containing glutathione-dependent DCM dehalogenases and leads to

77

complete detoxification to carbon dioxide (CO2) and inorganic chloride (Cl–).8-10 In contrast, the

78

details of DCM degradation under strictly anoxic conditions have remained elusive because of

79

the limited number of cultures and the fastidious growth of these bacteria. Dehalobacterium

80

formicoaceticum, affiliated with the Peptococcaceae family, is so far the only pure culture

81

utilizing DCM as a growth substrate under strictly anoxic conditions, generating acetate,

82

formate, and Cl– according to Eq. 1.11,12

83

3 CH2Cl2 + 4 H2O + CO2 → 2 HCOO– + CH3COO– + 9 H+ + 6 Cl–

84

(1)

Recently, a few mixed cultures harboring bacteria affiliated with the Peptococcaceae

85

family, e.g., Dehalobacter sp., and/or Dehalobacterium sp., were reported to degrade DCM

86

anaerobically, generating acetate as the major degradation product.13-17 Consortium RM was

87

derived from pristine Rio Mameyes River sediment collected near the El Yunque National Forest

88

in Puerto Rico,15 and the DCM-degrading bacterium in the mixed culture has been identified as

89

Candidatus Dichloromethanomonas elyunquensis, representing a new genus and species within

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

4

Page 5 of 34

Environmental Science & Technology

90

the Peptococcaceae family, which is able to metabolize DCM to acetate, H2, CO2, and Cl–

91

according to Eq. 2.16,18

92

3 CH2Cl2 + 4 H2O → 2 H2 + CO2 + CH3COO– + 7 H+ + 6 Cl–

93

(2)

Physiological and biochemical studies of D. formicoaceticum and Ca.

94

Dichloromethanomonas elyunquensis suggested that DCM is degraded via a fermentation

95

pathway under strictly anoxic conditions (Eq. 1 and Eq. 2)12,15,18 After removal of the chlorine

96

substituents, DCM is transformed to methylene-tetrahydrofolate (CH2=H4folate), funneled into

97

the Wood-Ljungdahl pathway (i.e., reductive acetyl-CoA pathway) and disproportionated. Two

98

thirds of CH2=H4folate is oxidized to formate or H2/CO2 generating reducing equivalents, and the

99

remaining third, in combination with CO2, is reduced to acetate (Eq. 1 and Eq. 2).12,18 For both

100

bacterial cultures, the removal of the chlorine substituents has not been resolved.

101

Practitioners confront challenges both in providing definitive evidence that

102

bioremediation will lead to detoxification, and in delineating biodegradation mechanisms so that

103

optimization of remedial strategies is possible. Decreasing contaminant concentrations

104

generally do not provide sufficient evidence that cleanup will be achieved because physical

105

processes such as sorption or dilution, rather than degradation, may be the driver behind the

106

observations. Compound specific isotope analysis (CSIA) provides an effective means of

107

directly assessing transformation of organic contaminants in situ and has received increasing

108

attention in recent years.19,20 CSIA measures stable isotope ratios of carbon and/or other

109

elements of contaminants dissolved in groundwater at environmentally relevant concentrations,

110

i.e., parts per million (ppm, mg L–1) to parts per billion (ppb, µg L–1). CSIA is in principal based

111

on kinetic isotope effects (KIEs) of biochemical reactions, viz. chemical bonds containing

112

exclusively light isotopes (e.g., 12C, 35Cl) are preferentially cleaved compared with those

113

containing one or more heavy isotopes (e.g., 13C, 37Cl), resulting in a relative enrichment in

114

molecules containing the heavier isotope in the remaining contaminant mass – a process called

115

isotopic fractionation.21 CSIA has been successfully implemented to evaluate and monitor

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

5

Environmental Science & Technology

116

degradation of many organic contaminants, including hydrocarbons,22-24, organohalogens,25-28

117

and pesticides,29,30 in both laboratory and in situ studies. KIEs can be useful in elucidating

118

degradation reaction mechanisms, and this approach has been successfully applied to identify

119

characteristic fractionation factors associated with different degradation pathways.19

120

Page 6 of 34

Previous studies explored stable carbon isotope fractionation during DCM degradation

121

by methylotrophic bacteria under oxic and nitrate-reducing conditions.31-33 This prior work31-33

122

demonstrated a significant stable carbon isotope fractionation during DCM degradation, with εC

123

values ranging from −22 to −66.3‰ under oxic conditions and −26 to −61.0‰ under nitrate-

124

reducing conditions. Notably, in all of the aerobic and facultative anaerobic bacterial strains

125

tested, DCM degradation is carried out by glutathione-dependent dehalogenases catalyzing

126

nucleophilic substitution reactions.9,10,32 Limited information is available about the carbon isotope

127

fractionation associated with DCM degradation performed by strict anaerobes. Carbon isotope

128

enrichment factors (εC) of −15.5 ± 1.5‰ and −27 ± 2‰ were reported during anaerobic DCM

129

degradation in mixed cultures containing Dehalobacter14 and Dehalobacterium17 populations,

130

respectively. However, single element isotope effects can be masked by the bioavailability of

131

the electron donor or the electron acceptor,34-36 mass transfer limitations,37,38 uptake and

132

transport of a substrate across the cell membrane,39,40 microbial cell densities,41 and/or

133

preceding enzymatic reactions42. Such other rate-limiting steps can lead to observed apparent

134

kinetic isotope effect (AKIE) values that are smaller than those predicted based on the

135

associated bond cleavage. A recent study suggested that the concentration of dissolved organic

136

carbon and toxic effects of DCM and other contaminants may affect the carbon isotope

137

fractionation associated with aerobic DCM degradation.33 In such cases, two-dimensional or

138

dual isotope analysis - the stable isotope fractionation of two elements (e.g., 13C and 37Cl)

139

involved in the reaction - is helpful, as masking typically affects both elements, and while the

140

single element fractionation factors may be masked, the ratio of fractionation factors, expressed

141

as the lambda value (ΛC/Cl = ∆δ13C/ ∆δ37Cl), is independent of such complicating effects.43,44

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

6

Page 7 of 34

Environmental Science & Technology

142

Only a single study has applied carbon and chlorine dual isotope analysis to investigate

143

DCM biodegradation by the aerobic bacterium, Hyphomicrobium sp. strain MC8b.31 In order for

144

this approach to be successfully applied to monitor anaerobic biodegradation of DCM in the

145

field, reference dual isotope studies under anoxic conditions are needed. To explore the

146

possible application of CSIA as a tool for monitoring DCM degradation under strictly anoxic

147

conditions and for probing possible mechanism(s) of C-Cl bond cleavage, carbon and chlorine

148

stable isotopes were measured during growth of D. formicoacetium and Ca.

149

Dichloromethanomonas elyunquensis in defined anoxic medium supplied with DCM as the sole

150

energy source.

151 152

Material and Methods

153

Cultures, cultivation conditions, and experimental setup. The DCM-degrading axenic

154

culture D. formicoaceticum was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC

155

700118).11,12 Consortium RM comprising Ca. Dichloromethanomonas elyunquensis was derived

156

from freshwater sediments collected from pristine Rio Mameyes in Puerto Rico.15,16 Both

157

cultures were grown with DCM as the growth substrate in defined, strictly anoxic mineral salt

158

medium containing 30 mM of sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) (pH 7.3) reduced with 0.2 mM

159

sodium sulfide (Na2S) and 0.2 mM L-cysteine.45

160

The experiments were conducted in 300-mL Duran glass vessels (Chemglass, Vineland,

161

NJ, US) containing 200 mL of medium sealed with black butyl rubber stoppers (Bellco Glass

162

Inc., Vineland, NJ, US) under a headspace of N2/CO2 (80/20, vol/vol). Culture vessels were

163

amended with 25 µL neat DCM (total amount ca. 400 µmoles; DCM aqueous concentration ca.

164

2 mM) using a 10-µL Hamilton microliter syringe (Reno, NV, US) prior to inoculation (5%,

165

vol/vol) from a DCM-grown culture, i.e., D. formicoaceticum or Ca. Dichloromethanomonas

166

elyunquensis. Six replicate vessels were prepared for each culture. Controls consisted of

167

duplicate vessels that received 10 mL of autoclaved inocula, and duplicate vessels amended

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

7

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 8 of 34

168

with DCM but not receiving inocula. All culture vessels were incubated at 30°C in the dark with

169

the stoppers up without agitation. Growth was assessed by monitoring DCM consumption.

170

During the incubation, 8 mL aqueous samples were periodically withdrawn using N2-flushed

171

glass syringes and transferred to closed glass serum vials (vol. = ca. 7.5 mL) (Supelco,

172

Bellefonte, PA, US) without any headspace. A volume of 10 µL saturated mercuric chloride

173

(HgCl2) solution was added to the serum vials to inhibit microbial activity and mixed thoroughly

174

following the addition of culture samples. All samples were stored at 4°C in the dark until carbon

175

and chlorine stable isotope analysis.

176

DCM concentration analysis and DCM degradation rate calculations. DCM headspace

177

concentrations were monitored by injecting 0.1 mL headspace samples into an Agilent 7890A

178

gas chromatograph (GC) (Santa Clara, CA, US) equipped with a DB-624 column (60 m length,

179

0.32 mm i.d., 1.8 µm film thickness) and a flame ionization detector (FID). The GC inlet was

180

maintained at 200°C, the GC oven temperature was kept at 60°C for 2 minutes followed by an

181

increase to 200°C at a ramping rate of 25°C min–1, and the FID detector was operated at 300°C.

182

DCM calibration curves were prepared by adding DCM (ca. 8 - 800 µmoles) to 300-mL culture

183

vessels containing 200 mL of medium. The uncertainty for DCM concentration measurements

184

using GC/FID was