2
INDUSTRIAL AND ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY
Thanks, Northeastern Section I T H an official communication to the SOCIETY, the Kortheastern Section has transmitted a check for one thousand dollars to be added to the endowment fund of the AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY. This money is a part of the unexpended balance remaining from the funds received by the general committee a t the Swampscott meeting and follows a precedent established a few years ago by the Washington Section, when it set aside a surplus from the spring meeting in the interest of a national headquarters building in Washington. Additions to the endowment fund have been made by the Philadelphia, Delaware, Richmond, and Detroit Sections where income from registration greatly exceeded expectations and generous local support was given to the national meeting. The generous action of the Xortheastern Section has been reported in the Nucleus. It is good news for the entire SOCIETY, the thanks of which we are glad t o express.
Vol. 21, No. 1
With the initiation of this new service, INDUSTRIAL AND ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY still more firmly establishes itself as a unique publication. Industry and chemical technology are served by our industrial edition, which appears the first of every month. The news of chemistry reaches you through the twenty-four issues of the News Edition, and now analytical methods and improvements in analytical apparatus will come to you quarterly in the Analytical Edition. We believe these services will prove of signal value in advancing chemistry. The steady growth in the circulation of INDUSTRIAL AND ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY, together with the extent t o which articles are reprinted from its pages, speak eloquently of the appreciation with which the publication is generally received.
Duplication T T H E second session of the Institute of Chemistry of A the American Chemical Society held last year at Northwestern University, in a round-table discussion on research
with special reference to government activities the subject of duplication in laboratories of various bureaus naturally arose. It is appreciated that often a certain duplication is ITHOUT regard to the way in which the work of desirable to insure adequate checking, accuracy, and security chemistry may be classified or subdivided, analytical against the omission of important data by a single group of chemistry is vital t o all. Its accomplishments may not be investigators. On the other hand there have been cases spectacular, much of it seems routine, and usually the part of appropriation of promising problems, particularly where i t contributes to the success of important work is unnoticed. success might lead to valuable publicity and increased funds. The contributions of analytical chemistry may not be appre- The questions turned to what is done elsewhere and Sir James ciated by the plant manager, nor by the director of the labora- Irvine, our guest from St. Andrews, told something of the tory, nor the chief of the bureau, but every chemist knows British machinery for dealing with research conducted with t o what extent we depend upon accuracy in this field of work. public funds. What is done in Great Britain might not For a number of years the leaders in this important part of fully apply to American conditions, but the plan should be our science have stressed the need for the segregation of carefully studied by those in authority for constructive articles primarily of importance to the analyst, pointing out ideas. the greater ease with which they could then be made available To begin with, the Department of Scientific and Industrial to him and the wider utility they might be expected to have Research, which began as an honorary council during the in every field of chemistry. It has not been possible here- war, has been set up to encourage, organize, and assist in the tofore to meet this need. The matter has been the subject direction of work in government departments, as well as in of many conversations with those interested, and more trade association laboratories established with government recently we have devoted much thought to the possibilities. aid. The department is under the guidance of an advisory Several plans have been discussed with the Executive Com- council, which has very wide powers and which is composed mittee of the SOCIETY and a long contemplated step has of men, distinguished in science or business, who are appointed now been authorized by the Directors, who have reached by the Lord President of the Privy Council-at the moment their decision not alone on the basis of service to be rendered Earl Balfour. The National Chemical Laboratory and the but upon financial grounds as well. National Physical Laboratory are managed by the CounBeginning with the current year, articles on analysis which cil, as are the laboratories of twenty research associations. AND EKGINEERING ordinarily would appear in IKDUSTRIAL The Council is grouped into numerous committees and augCHEMISTRY will be segregated in an Analytical Edition of mented with cooperative members t o form boards, the work INDUSTRIAL AND ENGIXEERING CHEMISTRY, which is to appear of which is familiar in reports on fuel, building, food research, quarterly. This will go without charge to all those receiving etc. INDUSTRIAL AND ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY, but it Will a h 0 As all committees and boards in research associations report have a separate subscription list. This is for the purpose of through the Council, it is an easy matter to note the tendency making it available to the many analysts of the country who toward duplication, and indeed all research programs being are not members of the AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY,and submitted in advance t o Council for the sake of obtaining the whose principal interest is in analytical chemistry. Teachers necessary financing make it a simple matter to prevent duwho may wish to do so can secure copies of the Analytical plication in cases where it is not considered best. It must Edition for the use of students, and directors of industrial be remembered that all this refers only to activities directly laboratories may wish to place separates in the hands of the under government supervision, or carried on in cooperation analytical staff. with government officials. Private establishments conduct For the present the amount of space to be devoted to their programs of research in their own way, but even here analytical articles will be no greater than the average in many a piece of needless work may be saved by discussing INDUSTRIAL AND ENGINEERING CHEhlISTRY for the past few projects with those in position to know what is in progress. years. It is simply a segregation under another cover of Various conditions require different treatment and the articles dealing with analysis. While it will have its own British plan could not be adopted in detail in America. Could not a group of disinterested scientists and business pagination, the format will be identical with INDUSTRIAL AND ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY,so it may be bound with the men be brought together to study plans for research as inindustrial edition or separately as may be preferred. itiated by the various government bureaus, and advise upon
Improved Service
January, 1929
INDUSTRIAL AND ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY
coordination and the elimination of duplication before requests are made for appropriations? Civilian boards have been used to advantage by the War and Navy Departments, and many government bureaus have consultants who aid in various ways. Why not accomplish, through a civilian board, what has been so difficult under official auspices? The first step in a major piece of research involves breaking it into small parts which may be more succesefully handled by specialists. All of these may not be in a single bureau or department. The allocation of problems to those laboratories where the most can be accomplished in view of personnel and facilities would benefit the public a t large and directly the bureaus and scientists involved.
An Unwise Policy HE War Department has decreed that after one term of service as chief of an army branch the incumbent shall not be eligible for reappointment, but shall be returned to the grade from which he was elevated to be chief, making way for another. This policy is contrary to the spirit and letter of the law as well as to precedent, and is particularly unwise when applied to the services of Ordnance Department, Quartermaster Corps, lledical Department, Chemical Warfare Service, and Finance Department. The law states that chiefs shall be appointed for a period of four years and says nothing on the subject of reappointments, but hIr. Root, when Secretary, stated before the Senate Committee on Military Affairs, December 14, 1900, that by omitting reference to reappointments the chiefs of the various services would feel that reassignment to duty a t the end of four years would depend upon their satisfactory performance and tend to make them more effective officers. The practice of reappointing efficient chiefs when eligible has been followed for twenty-six years, and Congress in the S a tional Defense Act of June 4, 1920, recognized the value of permanency of rank in special services by providing that all officers in the various branches should be commissioned permanently in those branches. Congress still further indicated the importance of keeping special technical men in places for which they were particularly fitted by providing that the President niiglit exempt officers in the Ordnance Department, Medical Department, and Chemical Karfare Service from duty with troops, as prescribed in the National Defense Act for all officers serijng in grades below that of brigadier general. It may not be generally understood that officers in the services of the military establishment are not eligible for promotion t o brigadier generals or major generals of the arms. As officers in noncombatant branches, their chance for promotion is limited to that of assistant chief, or chief of their branches. If, by meritorious service, they win such distinction they have a right to expect, if efficient, t o be continued in that assignment until retired for age or disability, as in the case of other general officers. Brigadier generals and major generals of the arms, that is, of the Infantry, Coast arid Field Artillery, Cavalry, Air Corps, Corps of Engineers, and Signal Corps have permanent appointments. It is evident that t o adopt a policy making impossible the reappointment in the services is such a discrimination as to discourage able young officers from entering them and tend towards transfers. The result will inevitably be t o fill those branches with the less efficient men, and in the case of another emergency an inevitable breakdown would occur in the supply and production of ordnance, gas masks, air planes, tanks, and all manner of vital necessities. When life was relatively more simple there may have been
3
some justification for the belief that a graduate of West Point was fitted to undertake any task, no matter how technical. But these are days of specialties which even the War Department recognizes in the practice of sending officers for postgraduate work to highly specialized schools. West Point makes no effort t o give technical training for specialties in the services, but leaves it to be acquired through years of special contact and work a t other institutions. Surely in the Army, as in business, when a man has proved himself efficient and has mastered the details of his assignment, it is the height of unwisdom to make changes. What business would declare a policy of removing the heads of departments and the officers of the company a t the end of every four years, retiring them on a greatly reduced salary to make way, by the clock, for younger men who may or may not know the business? We fancy it would be difficult to finance such an institution. The Chemical Warfare Service is a conspicuous example of a highly technical branch of the service where, if the present policy of the War Department is applied, great damage may be done. It requires years to become familiar with the details of chemical warfare, without which knowledge no officer, however well trained in other branches, can expect to give a constructive administration as chief. It takes time for the chief of this service t o perfect scientific and industrial contacts, without which he cannot succeed. The War Department policy proposes to demote the chief of a service to the grade from which he was appointed, usually that of a colonel. The men 1% ho become chiefs of branches reach this grade after many, many years of army service and in nearly every case they are eligible to retirement on the basis of the term of thirty years of service, if not upon age. To force a chief t o choose betn-een retirement as a major general and continuation in the service as a colonel will, as it has where the policy has been applied, result in losing the services of the specialist a t the very time the tax payer begins to get a return on the Government’s investment in him. If there is anything in the contention that the new policy will be an incentive to younger men, then surely the certain loss to the service which must come from its logical pursuit might be compensated to a degree by retaining in some capacity, compatible with the rank they have held, the chiefs of branches following their single four-year term. To leave matters as they now stand forces the appointment of chiefs of these branches into politics of the worst order. Efficiency as chief will not count, and as reappointment will not depend upon satisfactory service there is no good reason why the friends of those making appointments should not be given preference. The new procedure seems particularly unfortunate in the case of the Chemical Warfare Service, for i t is the youngest as well as the smallest of the branches and there has not been time to train a sufficient number of officers to permit frequent changes in the chief of the branch without a considerable setback to the service. The number attached to the branch is so small that only one or tn-o men are eligible by rank a t present to be promoted t o chief. This increases the danger to this service, for should the policy be maintained someone wholly unfamiliar with the work, traditions, and history, and with the science underlying the service may be brought in from some other branch t o be made its chief. The policy is evidently unwise as applied to the Army as a whole, and particularly unsound as applied to the Chemical Warfare Service. Unless changed it may lead to a loss of the interest which has been obtained widely in the chemical industry and among the chemical profession. Should this take place, the safety of the country will inevitably suffer.
