Ecological and Transcriptional Responses of Anode-Respiring

Apr 4, 2017 - Ecological and Transcriptional Responses of Anode-Respiring Communities to Nitrate in a Microbial Fuel Cell. Varun N. Srinivasan and Cai...
2 downloads 0 Views 941KB Size
Subscriber access provided by UNIV OF UTAH

Article

Ecological and Transcriptional Responses of AnodeRespiring Communities to Nitrate in a Microbial Fuel Cell Varun N. Srinivasan, and Caitlyn S. Butler Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b06572 • Publication Date (Web): 04 Apr 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on April 5, 2017

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Environmental Science & Technology is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 32

Environmental Science & Technology

Ecological and Transcriptional Responses of AnodeRespiring Communities to Nitrate in a Microbial Fuel Cell Varun N. Srinivasan and Caitlyn S. Butler* Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Massachusetts-Amherst, Amherst MA 01003.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

1

ABSTRACT

2

A poorly understood phenomenon with a potentially significant impact on electron recovery, is

3

competition in microbial fuel cells (MFC) between anode-respiring bacteria and microorganisms

4

that use other electron acceptors. Nitrate is a constituent of different wastewaters and can act as a

5

competing electron acceptor in the anode. Studies investigating the impact of competition on

6

population dynamics in mixed communities in the anode are lacking. Here, we investigated the

7

impact of nitrate at different C/N ratios, 1.8, 3.7 and 7.4 mg-C/mg-N, on the electrochemical

8

performance and the biofilm community in mixed-culture chemostat MFCs. The electrochemical

9

performance of the MFC was not affected under electron donor non-limiting conditions, 7.4 mg-

10

C/mg-N. At lower C/N, electron donor limiting, ratios electron recovery was significantly

11

affected. The electrochemical performance recovered upon removal of nitrate at 3.7 mg-C/mg-N,

12

but did not at 1.8 mg-C/mg-N.

13

Deltaproteobacteria accompanied by increase in Betaproteobacteria in response to nitrate at low

14

C/N ratios and no significant changes at 7.4 mg-C/mg-N. Transcriptional analysis showed

15

increased transcription of nirK and nirS genes during nitrate flux suggesting that denitrification

16

to N2, and not facultative nitrate reduction by Geobacter spp., might be the primary response to

17

perturbation with nitrate.

18

INTRODUCTION

19

Bioelectrochemical systems (BESs) are a promising technology due to their ability to treat

20

organic waste, decouple the electron donor and electron acceptor reactions and potential to

21

produce an energetic product. BESs have great potential in applications as a mixed-culture

22

bioprocess. However, before wide scale application, the robustness and resilience of anodic

23

communities to environmental conditions have to be evaluated. In order to implement BESs in

Microbial community analysis showed a decrease of

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 2 of 32

Page 3 of 32

Environmental Science & Technology

24

natural and engineered settings, there is a need for understanding the response of the anode-

25

respiring communities to perturbations. Perturbations can have long-term or short-term effects

26

which can adversely influence the performance of the biofilm and the technology.

27

For example, oxygen crossover from the cathode of a microbial fuel cell (MFC) to the anode

28

can cause a decrease in coulombic efficiencies (CEs) and lead to the growth of aerobic

29

microorganisms in the anode which can outcompete anode-respiring bacteria (ARB).1,2

30

Similarly, the presence of methanogenic communities can lead to decrease in CEs in MFCs or

31

hydrogen yield in microbial electrolysis cells (MECs).3–6 ARB can also have alternate

32

metabolisms such as nitrate, sulfate, and ferric respiration capabilities that can serve as

33

competing metabolisms.7–9 In a mixed community, where both non-ARB and ARB exist, the

34

primary response to induction of competition is unknown. An understanding of the response of

35

the biofilm community to these perturbations can lead to a better design and optimization of this

36

technology for scale-up and implementation.

37

Nitrate is a regulated drinking water and wastewater contaminant. The common presence of

38

nitrate in the environments in which MFCs can be potentially used such as for groundwater

39

bioremediation10–12 and treatment of pre-processed secondary sludge13–17, makes it a co-

40

contaminant of interest. The effect of nitrate on anode-respiring biofilms is of great interest

41

since many bacteria harbor nitrate reduction capabilities including ARB such as Geobacter

42

spp.9,18,19 and Shewenella spp..20,21 The effect of nitrate on mixed community anode respiring

43

biofilms has been previously studied by Sukkasem et al (2008).22 CE was affected by the

44

presence of nitrate in the anode while the maximum voltage output was not affected. Sukkasem

45

et al. (2008) performed some preliminary investigations into the effect of nitrate on the microbial

46

community using polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

47

(DGGE). They postulated the existence of two distinct groups of bacteria: obligate ARB and

48

facultative ARB capable of nitrate reduction. However, more quantitative investigations are

49

required to understand the effect of nitrate on the biofilm community. The existence of

50

facultative ARB capable of nitrate reduction has been documented by other studies.23 The effect

51

of nitrate on electrode-respiring Geobacter metallireducens was studied by Kashima and Regan.9

52

They observed that G.metallireducens biofilms reduced nitrate at a range of anode potentials.

53

The critical nitrate concentration, at which a significant decrease in BES performance was

54

observed, depended on the biofilm thickness. The use of nitrate as a competing electron acceptor

55

by facultative ARBs was controlled by diffusional limitations in thicker biofilms.

56

The above studies have investigated the effect of nitrate on anode-respiring biofilms using

57

batch reactors. BESs designed for natural or engineered settings would require a chemostat based

58

study which has more relevance to treatment outcomes. In a chemostat, there is continuous

59

addition of the perturbing component (nitrate) to the MFC which could induce changes

60

community structure over time not observed in batch-style experiments. Furthermore, previous

61

studies have postulated the existence of both heterotrophic denitrifiers and facultative ARB

62

capable of nitrate reduction, but a quantitative investigation into the community dynamics in the

63

presence of nitrate has not been undertaken. An understanding of the effects of nitrate on the

64

microbial community and the resiliency of the communities to recover from such perturbations

65

could play an important role when MFCs are used for bioremediation or wastewater applications.

66

Though researchers have often implicated competition in reduced MFC performance, few have

67

explored the dynamics explicitly and those who have, have used batch configurations and/or pure

68

cultures. This study describes the effect of an example competing electron acceptor, nitrate, on

69

the structure of mixed microbial communities and resilience of putative anode-respiring species

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 4 of 32

Page 5 of 32

Environmental Science & Technology

70

after the community’s response to a continuous input of nitrate in a chemostat over an extended

71

period of time. The effect of three stoichiometrically relevant C/N ratios (1.8, 3.7 and 7.4 mg-

72

C/mg-N) on the performance and microbial ecology of the anode in mixed culture chemostat-

73

MFCs was examined using a combination of 16S rRNA gene sequencing and transcriptional

74

profiling using reverse transcription-quantitative PCR. This approach could not only lead to a

75

more quantitative understanding of the response of the communities to nitrate as an alternate

76

electron acceptor but also point towards the predominant metabolic response to nitrate in the

77

community which has previously not been identified. We hypothesize that at high C/N ratios

78

(electron donor non-limiting), the presence of nitrate will not affect the electrochemical

79

performance of the MFC while electron-donor limiting conditions will negatively affect the

80

electrochemical performance of the MFC. We also hypothesize that the presence of nitrate in the

81

bulk solution at low C/N ratios will cause significant changes in the biofilm community leading

82

to decrease in the relative abundance of anode-respiring bacteria with time.

83

MATERIALS AND METHODS

84

MFC Design and Operation.

85

Dual chamber H-type MFCs with a cation exchange membrane (CMI-7000, Membrane

86

International Inc., Glen Rock) were used for all the experiments. Graphite cloth coupons (2.2 x

87

11 x 0.32 cm) were used as electrodes with 5 electrode coupons in each chamber. Marine grade

88

wire (Vertex Marine) was used to make all the electrical connections. An Ag/AgCl reference

89

electrode (RE-6, BASi Inc. USA) was placed in each of the anode chambers to measure the

90

anode potential.

91

The anode chambers were inoculated with primary effluent from the Amherst Wastewater

92

Treatment Plant, Amherst MA and acclimated in recycle batch with an external resistance of

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

93

1500 Ω. The MFCs were inoculated with a 10:90 (by volume) mixture of inoculum and a

94

phosphate-buffered minimal growth medium (see supplementary information for details) with

95

1.66 g/L potassium acetate. The feed was sparged with filter-sterilized N2 gas for at least 45

96

minutes prior to addition to the reactor. The feed solution was replaced when the voltage dropped

97

below 0.05 V during the acclimation phase. The MFCs were operated in batch mode until

98

reproducible maximum voltages were obtained for two successive batches. The MFCs were then

99

switched to chemostat-mode at a flow rate of 0.21 mL/min (HRT=20 hours). The anode chamber

100

was sparged continuously with filter-sterilized N2 gas to prevent oxygen diffusion into the anode

101

and 2-bromoethanosulfonic acid (BES) was added at 3 mM to inhibit acetoclastic

102

methanogenesis.4,24 All media was autoclaved. The anode chamber was continuously stirred

103

throughout the experiment. The cathode contained 70 mM potassium ferricyanide in 80 mM

104

phosphate buffer solution. All experiments were performed in duplicate.

105

Experimental Design.

106

The acetate concentration in the influent of the anode was decreased consecutively to

107

determine Scritical of acetate required for maximum coulombic efficiency (analogous to minimum

108

substrate concentration required for growth) in each reactor. The Scricitcal for the anode of an MFC

109

is defined (in this study) as the minimum acetate concentration that would produce the maximum

110

voltage obtained during the end of the acclimation phase. The Scritical has been shown to be

111

important in other competition studies.25 The MFCs were run at each successively decreasing

112

acetate concentrations for >3 HRTs. Once Scritical was determined and steady state conditions

113

(steady performance for >3 HRTs) were achieved (Phase I), nitrate (as sodium nitrate) was

114

introduced into the anode of the MFC at different C/N ratios with one of the reactors serving as a

115

control (no nitrate). The C/N ratios used in this experiment were 1.8, 3.7 and 7.4 mg-C/mg-N

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 6 of 32

Page 7 of 32

Environmental Science & Technology

116

(1.4, 2.8 and 5.7 meq e--donor/meq e- -NO3-). The different C/N ratios were tested in different

117

MFC chemostats to avoid gradual adaptation of the community to nitrate. Nitrate was fed to the

118

anode continuously for 43 days to study the long-term effect of nitrate on the anode-respiring

119

biofilm (Phase II). Sodium chloride was added to normalize the conductivity of the media across

120

different conditions. After 43 days, nitrate was removed from the influent to the anode and the

121

MFC was operated without nitrate (Phase III) to test the resilience of the anode biofilms.

122

Measurements and Analyses.

123

Acetate was monitored in the influent and effluent of the anode using a Metrohm 850

124

Professional Ion Chromatograph (Metrohm Inc., Switzerland) with a Metrosep A Supp 5-250

125

Anion Column (Metrohm Inc., Switzerland) using a 3.2 mM Na2CO3 and 1.0 mM NaHCO3

126

eluent. Samples were filtered using 0.45 µm syringe filters and stored at -20 °C before analysis.

127

Nitrate, nitrite and ammonium were measured using a colorimeter (DR 890, Hach Company)

128

according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

129

The voltage across an external resistance of 1500 Ω was monitored every 15 minutes using a

130

Keithley Model 2700 Multimeter with a 7700 Switching Module (Keithley Instruments Inc.,

131

Cleveland, OH, USA). Polarization curves were performed using a Gamry Series G750

132

Potentionstat/Galvanostat/ZRA (Gamry, USA). The voltage sweep was applied at a rate of 1

133

mV/s.

134

Coulombic efficiency (CE) was calculated using equation S1 (supplementary information).

135

Biofilm Sampling and DNA/RNA Extraction.

136

Anode electrode samples were collected at various stages of the experiment and preserved

137

appropriately (see supplementary information for details). RNA and DNA were extracted from

138

the electrode samples using the RNA Power Soil Cut (Mo Bio Laboratories Inc.) with a DNA

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

139

Elution Accessory Kit (Mo Bio Laboratories Inc.). The extracted RNA was then treated with

140

DNase Max Kit (Mo Bio Laboratories Inc.) to remove any DNA contamination. The extracted

141

DNA and RNA were then quantified with a spectrophotometer (NanoDrop, ND-100, NanoDrop

142

Technologies, Wilmington, DE). mRNA was then converted into cDNA using the High Capacity

143

cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Life Technologies) and stored at -20 °C.

144

Quantitative PCR.

145

The activity of denitrifying genes was assessed using nitrite-reductase specific primers for nirK

146

and nirS. The nirK activity was assessed using nirK876 and nirK1040.26 nirS activitiy was

147

assessed using nirSCd3af and nirSR3cd.27,28 Bioelectrochemical activity was assessed using

148

Geobacter spp. as model ARBs. The activity of Geobacter spp. was measured using Geobacter

149

16S rRNA gene specific primers Geo564F and Geo840R.29 Even though this method can have

150

potential limitations in terms of non-specific amplification from the 16S rRNA gene from other

151

bacteria, this is the only method at present to quantify the activity of the Geobacter spp. due to

152

lack of a specific functional gene for anode respiration. For performing relative quantification,

153

16S rRNA gene was used as the reference transcript. The primer pair used for 16S rRNA gene

154

quantification was 1114f and 1275r.30 Amplification of cDNA templates was carried out using a

155

StepOne™ Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems) using SYBR Green as a detection

156

system. The reactions for each target were performed separately (more details are provided in

157

supplementary information). Triplicate wells were run for each sample for each gene target.

158

Standard curves, melting curves and negative controls were run for each qPCR run.

159

Illumina MiSeq Sequencing and Analysis.

160

The extracted DNA was sent to Research and Testing Facility (Lubbock, TX) for PCR

161

amplification and sequencing targeting the V3-V4 region using the primers 338aF (5’-

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 8 of 32

Page 9 of 32

Environmental Science & Technology

162

ACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCAG-3’) and 785R (5’-GACTACHVGGGTATCTAATCC-3’) and

163

the amplicons were sequenced on the Illumina MiSeq platform using V3 chemistry. The raw

164

Fastq files were cleaned using Sickle 1.3331 with a minimum window quality score of 20. The

165

quality-controlled sequences were analyzed using mothur32 using the protocol described in

166

Kozich et al.33 The protocol is further described in supplementary information.

167

Statistical Analyses.

168

The anode potential, coulombic efficiency and acetate removal data were split into three

169

phases: before nitrate flux, during nitrate flux (Day 0 to Day 43) and nitrate removed (days 44 to

170

60). Statistical analysis comparing the three phases within each treatment was performed using

171

1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by a Tukey’s Honestly Significant Difference

172

(HSD). The HSD results are reported only if the 1-way ANOVA showed a significant effect.

173

The normalized (using 16S rRNA transcripts as reference) relative quantities of gene

174

transcripts (Rqtarget) were calculated for each target transcript and logarithmic (base 2) fold

175

change values between sampling day (t) and the start of nitrate flux (Day 0) as follows: log  Fold Change =

Rq Rq

176

Statistical analysis of the fold change values within each C/N ratio treatment condition was

177

performed using 1-way ANOVA using sampling day as the main effect. Significant interaction

178

effects were further determined with Tukey’s HSD test. Non-metric multidimensional scaling

179

(NMDS) analysis using the UniFrac weighted metric was performed in R34 using the phyloseq35

180

package. Other R packages used in the analysis and plotting were ggplot236, vegan37, dplyr38 and

181

ampvis.39

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 10 of 32

182

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

183

The electrochemical performance of the MFCs is adversely affected by nitrate at low C/N

184

ratios

185

The MFCs were acclimated under optimal operating conditions with respect to power

186

production and Scritical for each reactor (0.59 mM) were determined (Phase I). Acetate removal

187

was not complete during this period. When nitrate was introduced into the anode, complete

188

removal of nitrate was observed in the effluent of the anode across all the C/N ratios (data not

189

shown). Neither nitrite nor ammonium were detected in the effluent during the period of nitrate

190

flux. It is possible that ammonium produced through DNRA could have been assimilated by the

191

cells and not detected in the effluent. Acetate removal increased significantly from 41.7 ± 9.4 %

192

to 85.9 ± 10.6 % (p