Effect of Bubble Concentration on the in Vitro and in Vivo Performance

Mar 26, 2019 - Eric C. Abenojar† , Pinunta Nittayacharn‡ , Al Christopher de Leon† , Reshani Perera† , Yu Wang† , Ilya Bederman§ , and Agat...
0 downloads 0 Views 2MB Size
Subscriber access provided by UNIV OF NEW ENGLAND ARMIDALE

Biological and Environmental Phenomena at the Interface

Effect of Bubble Concentration on the In Vitro and In Vivo Performance of Highly Stable Lipid shell-stabilized Micro- and Nanoscale Ultrasound Contrast Agents Eric C. Abenojar, Pinunta Nittayacharn, Al de Leon, Reshani Perera, Yu Wang, Ilya Bederman, and Agata A. Exner Langmuir, Just Accepted Manuscript • Publication Date (Web): 26 Mar 2019 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on April 1, 2019

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 33 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Langmuir

Effect of Bubble Concentration on the In Vitro and In Vivo Performance of Highly Stable Lipid Shell-stabilized Micro- and Nanoscale Ultrasound Contrast Agents Eric C. Abenojar,1‡ Pinunta Nittayacharn,2‡ Al Christopher de Leon,1 Reshani Perera,1 Yu Wang,1 Ilya Bederman,3 Agata A. Exner1,2* 1Department

of Radiology, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Adelbert Rd. Cleveland,

OH 44106 2Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Adelbert Rd. Cleveland, OH 44106 3Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Adelbert Rd. Cleveland, OH 44106

ABSTRACT Ultrasound (US) is a widely used diagnostic imaging tool because it is inexpensive, safe, portable, and broadly accessible. Ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) are employed to enhance backscatter echo and improve imaging contrast. The most frequently utilized UCAs are echogenic bubbles made with a phospholipid or protein-stabilized hydrophobic gas core. While clinically utilized, applications of UCAs are often limited by rapid signal decay (< 5 min) in vivo under typical ultrasound imaging protocols. Here, we report on a formulation of lipid shell–stabilized perfluoropropane (C3F8) microbubbles and nanobubbles with a significantly prolonged in vivo stability. Microbubbles (875 ± 280 nm) of the target size were prepared by utilizing a multiplestep centrifugation cycle while nanobubbles (299 ± 189 nm) were isolated from the activated vial using a single centrifugation step. To provide in-depth acoustic characterization of the new construct we evaluated the effect of size and concentration on their in vitro and in vivo performance. In vitro and in vivo characterization were carried out for a range of bubble concentrations normalized by total gas volume quantified via headspace gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). In vitro characterization revealed that nanobubbles at different concentrations are more consistently stable over time with the highest and lowest dilutions (50fold decrease) only differing in US signal after 8 min exposure by 10.34% while for microbubbles,

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Langmuir 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

the difference was 86.46%. As expected, due to the difference in hydrodynamic diameter and scattering cross-section difference, nanobubbles showed lower overall initial signal intensity. In vivo experiments showed that both microbubbles and nanobubbles with similar initial peak signal intensity, are comparably stable over time with 66.8% and 60.6% remaining signal after 30 min, respectively. This study demonstrates that bubble concentration has significant effects on the persistence of both microbubbles and nanobubbles in vitro and in vivo, but the effects are more pronounced in larger bubbles. These effects should be taken into account when selecting the appropriate bubble parameters for future imaging applications.

Keywords: ultrasound molecular imaging, contrast agent, microbubbles, nanobubbles, lipid shellstabilized bubbles

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 2 of 33

Page 3 of 33 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Langmuir

INTRODUCTION Ultrasound (US) is a widely used medical imaging modality providing real-time imaging and diagnosis. It is accessible, portable, inexpensive, safe (i.e. no ionizing radiation), and noninvasive. However, because of relatively poor soft tissue contrast compared to other imaging techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), contrast agents have been developed to overcome this limitation and to provide a unique real-time tool to characterize tissue hemodynamic parameters.1–5 Ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) are typically in the form of protein,3,6–8, phospholipid,9–14 or polymer8,15–20 shell-stabilized gas-filled bubbles that are highly biocompatible and echogenic.2,21–25 Among these materials, lipid shelled bubbles are desirable because they are highly biocompatible, easy to produce, and have been shown to give stronger echogenic signals.26 UCAs enhance the backscattered echo signal producing contrast arising from 1) acoustic impedance mismatch between the gas in the bubbles and the surrounding tissue or blood pool and 2) nonlinear oscillations that are highly distinct from linear tissue behavior.2 UCAs improve US image quality and offer better temporal and spatial resolution, which helps in gaining more accurate diagnosis in different applications such as cardiovascular imaging, echocardiography, quantification of blood volume, blood flow, and tissue perfusion as well as in therapeutic applications, as a drug delivery medium.3,27–29 UCAs are typically classified based on size: microbubbles (MBs, 1-8 µm) or nanobubbles (NBs,