Effect of Nanoscale Surface Textures on Multiphase Flow Dynamics in

Apr 29, 2019 - Multiphase flow through porous media is important in a wide range of environmental applications such as enhanced oil recovery and geolo...
0 downloads 0 Views 2MB Size
Subscriber access provided by Bethel University

New Concepts at the Interface: Novel Viewpoints and Interpretations, Theory and Computations

The effect of nanoscale surface textures on multiphase flow dynamics in capillaries Bo Liang, Ioannis Zarikos, W. -B. Bartels, S. Majid Hassanizadeh, and Andres F. Clarens Langmuir, Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b04320 • Publication Date (Web): 29 Apr 2019 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on May 14, 2019

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 27 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Langmuir

TOC Art 85x47mm (300 x 300 DPI)

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Langmuir 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

1 2

The effect of nanoscale surface textures on multiphase flow dynamics in capillaries

3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

B. Liang1, I.M. Zarikos2, W.B. Bartels2, S.M. Hassanizadeh2 and A. Clarens1*

12

Abstract

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36

Multiphase flow through porous media is important in a wide range of environmental applications such as enhanced oil recovery and geologic storage of CO2. Recent in-situ observations of the three-phase contact line between immiscible fluid phases and solid surfaces suggest that existing models may not fully capture the effects of nanoscale surface textures, impacting flow prediction. To better characterize the role of surface roughness in these systems, spontaneous and forced imbibition experiments were carried out using glass capillaries with modified surface roughness and/or wettability. Dynamic contact angle and interfacial speed deviation, both resulting from stick-slip flow conditions, were measured to understand the impact these micro-scale dynamics would have on macro-scale flow processes. A 2k factorial experimental design was used to test the ways in which dynamic contact angle was impacted by the solid surface properties (e.g., wettability, roughness), ionic strength in the aqueous phase, non-aqueous fluid type (water/Fluorinert and water/dodecane), and the presence/absence of a wetting film prior to the imbibition of wetting phase. Analysis of variance of spontaneous imbibition results suggest that surface roughness and ionic strength play important roles in controlling dynamic contact angle in porous media, more than other factors tested here. The presence of a water film alone does not affect dynamic contact angle, but its interactions with surface roughness and aqueous chemistry have a statistically significant effect. Both forced imbibition and spontaneous imbibition experiments suggest that nanoscale textures can have a larger impact on flow dynamics than chemical wettability. These experimental results are used to extend the Joos and Wenzel equations relating apparent static and dynamic contact angles to roughness, presence of a water film, and water chemistry. The new empirical equation improves prediction accuracy by taking water film and aqueous chemistry into account, reducing error by up to 50%. 1

1

Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Virginia 351 McCormick Road, Thornton Hall, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USA 2

Department of Earth Sciences, Faculty of Geosciences Utrecht University, 3508 TA Utrecht, The Netherlands Corresponding author: Andres Clarens ([email protected])

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 2 of 27

Page 3 of 27 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Langmuir

37

Introduction

38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50

A number of naturally occurring and engineered processes in the environment involve the flow of multiple phases through porous media.1 Processes such as groundwater remediation, geologic carbon storage, enhanced geothermal energy production, and enhanced oil recovery are impacted by the porosity, pore geometry,2 viscosity ratio of fluids,3 flow conditions,4 interfacial tension,5 fluid dynamics6,7 and wettability of the host rock.4,8,9 Wettability in particular has been widely known to impact these flow processes10 but recent work using new in-situ imaging techniques suggests that smallscale (e.g., nanoscale) roughness or texturing on the mineral surface strongly impacts wettability,11,12 which can in turn impact fluid flow processes.13,14 These findings are consistent with much of the recent work focused on designing super-hydrophobic or super-hydrophilic surfaces, which rely in large part on nanoscale structure at the surface.15,16 The impact that these types of features would have on flow in a complex heterogeneous rock formation have not been studied to date.

51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

The role of roughness on interfacial forces acting on an apparent static three-phase contact line (Figure 1) has been considered extensively in the literature starting with the work of Wenzel and Cassie-Baxter.17,18 Wenzel’s model predicts that the wetting phase will completely penetrate the surface asperities on a rough surface and that, for a hydrophilic solid surface, this process will enhance wetting. Cassie modeled interfacial energy as a function of the structure of the solid surface suggesting that non-wetting phase fluid can get trapped in the pockets on the surface. Like most models of wettability, these are based on the relationship between fluid flow dynamics and the fluid-solid interaction. The difference between the Wenzel and Cassie-Baxter models, related to the presence/absence of a continuous wetting film, is depicted in Figure 1.

61 62 63 64 65

Figure 1. Illustration of multiphase flow across surfaces with a (a) smooth surface; (b) pre-wetted rough surface with a film of wetting phase filling in the asperities (i.e., the Wenzel model); and (c) rough surface with non-wetting phase filled in the asperities that leads to stick-slip flow (i.e., the Cassie model). 2

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Langmuir 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75

The presence or absence of a wetting film has been shown to play an important role in multiphase flow on rough surfaces.19 During imbibition of the wetting phase, a thin film of wetting phase can make the effective surface roughness of solid much less pronounced. The existence and swelling of the wetting film could also lead to snap-off of the non-wetting phase,20 which is a critical part of the displacement process. In the context of groundwater remediation, for example, the thickness of water film is proportional to the underlying solid surface roughness.21 In CO2 storage, water films have been shown to exist during CO2 injection and these become thinner as pressure increases and the surface becomes more negatively charged as CO2 dissolves into the film,22 which enables changes in solution chemistry.23

76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86

Experimental observations, such as contact line pinning or adhesion, are often attributed to these microscale characteristics related to surface textures and wetting.12,24 This roughness contributes, at least in part, to the development of stick-slip flow behavior at the interface.25,26 In the context of environmental systems, stick-slip flow can have complex impacts on multiphase flow in porous media, especially at low Capillary numbers (Ca).27,28 At low velocity, irregular movement of the interface in the pores can impact the stability of the system at macroscales. For example, in cases where the residual saturation of the non-wetting phase has been reached, the instability of interface between the continuous wetting phase and a non-wetting phase cluster could result in the mobilization or break-up of that cluster.29 Stick-slip flow can also impact the connectivity of fluids in a porous medium, which impacts ganglion dynamics.30

87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96

The wettability of two fluids on a solid surface is directly impacted by interfacial forces (e.g., interfacial tension) between those fluids.31 Interfacial tension is an aggregated measure of the cohesive forces and adhesive forces between the fluid phases, and therefore depends on the fluid chemistry.32 In aqueous systems, ion concentration and composition play an important role in driving interfacial tension and ultimately capillary pressure. The ionic composition of water can also impact the charged functional groups on the solid surface.33 While much fundamental work has been carried out in recent years to catalog and describe the impact of mineral chemical heterogeneities on wettability, less work has focused on how textures in different rock types that originated via diagenetic processes, might impact multiphase flow.34

97 98 99 100 101 102

These processes are generally described using the Washburn equation.35 The Washburn equation is a dynamic energy balance on idealized fluid flow through a single capillary with a uniform circular cross section under the laminar flow conditions. While some of these conditions (e.g., uniform cross section) are not representative of many environmental porous media, the majority of the assumptions (e.g., incompressible and Newtonian) are valid in many contexts. The model is typically written as: 3

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 4 of 27

Page 5 of 27 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Langmuir

𝛴𝑃 =

103

$%&'

(1)

)*+

104 105 106 107

where 𝛴𝑃 is the total pressure difference between two phases (the sum of the external ./ 012 3 pressure, ∆𝑃, and capillary pressure, 𝑃- = , where 𝜃 is the contact angle and 𝛾 * is the interfacial tension), i.e., 𝛴𝑃 = ∆𝑃 + 𝑃- . 𝜇 is the fluid viscosity, 𝑙 is the length of the capillary, 𝑄 is the volumetric flow rate, and r is the radius of the capillary.

108 109

Substituting these two pressure expressions into the Poiseuille equation, the Washburn equation can be written as: ∆𝑃 +

110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119

./ 012 3 *

=

$%&