Subscriber access provided by UNIV OF REGINA
Article
Effects of Cellular Sorption on Mercury Bioavailability and Methylmercury Production by Desulfovibrio desulfuricans ND132 Yurong Liu, Xia Lu, Linduo Zhao, Jing An, Ji-Zheng He, Eric M. Pierce, Alexander Johs, and Baohua Gu Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b04041 • Publication Date (Web): 14 Nov 2016 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on November 19, 2016
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
Environmental Science & Technology is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 23
Environmental Science & Technology
30 25 20 r = 0.98
Methylmercury (% of HgT)
Δ (Methylmercury produced) (% of HgT)
TOC Graphic
60 40 20 0 No cysteine added
15
0
24
Cysteine addition time (h)
10 5
Cysteine added = 50 μM
0 -30
-25
-20 -15 -10 -5 0 Δ (Inorganic Hg desorbed) (% of HgT)
5
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
10
Environmental Science & Technology
1
Effects of Cellular Sorption on Mercury Bioavailability and Methylmercury
2
Production by Desulfovibrio desulfuricans ND132
3 4 5
Yu-Rong Liu,‡,† Xia Lu,† Linduo Zhao,† Jing An,† Ji-Zheng He‡,¶, Eric M. Pierce,† Alexander Johs,† and Baohua Gu†,*
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
‡
State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China
†
Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, United States
¶
Department of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, the University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
*
Corresponding Author: Email:
[email protected]; Phone: (865)-574-7286; Fax: (865)-576-8543
1
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 2 of 23
Page 3 of 23
Environmental Science & Technology
22
Abstract
23
Microbial conversion of inorganic mercury (IHg) to methylmercury (MeHg) is a
24
significant environmental concern because of the bioaccumulation and biomagnification of
25
toxic MeHg in the food web. Laboratory incubation studies have shown that, despite the
26
presence of large quantities of IHg in cell cultures, MeHg biosynthesis often reaches a plateau
27
or a maximum within hours or a day by an as yet unexplained mechanism. Here we report
28
that mercuric Hg(II) can be taken up rapidly by cells of Desulfovibrio desulfuricans ND132,
29
but a large fraction of the Hg(II) is unavailable for methylation because of strong cellular
30
sorption. Thiols, such as cysteine, glutathione, and penicillamine, added either
31
simultaneously with Hg(II) or after cells have been exposed to Hg(II), effectively desorb or
32
mobilize the bound Hg(II), leading to a substantial increase in MeHg production. The amount
33
of thiol-desorbed Hg(II) is strongly correlated to the amount of MeHg produced (r = 0.98).
34
However, cells do not preferentially take up Hg(II)-thiol complexes, but Hg(II)-ligand
35
exchange between these complexes and the cell-associated proteins likely constrains Hg(II)
36
uptake and methylation. We suggest that, aside from aqueous chemical speciation of Hg(II),
37
binding and exchange of Hg(II) between cells and complexing ligands such as thiols and
38
naturally dissolved organics in solution is an important controlling mechanism of Hg(II)
39
bioavailability, which should be considered when predicting MeHg production in the
40
environment.
2
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
41
Introduction
42
Increased mercury (Hg) input and its subsequent conversion to neurotoxic
43
methylmercury (MeHg) in the environment is a growing concern because of the
44
bioaccumulation and biomagnification of MeHg in the food web.1-4 Methylmercury is formed
45
by a group of anaerobic microorganisms possessing the key gene cluster hgcAB.4-6 It was
46
shown that Hg methylation is an intracellular process, although significant knowledge gaps
47
exist with respect to Hg(II) uptake and the controls of Hg(II) uptake and methylation by these
48
organisms.7-10 The HgcA protein, which is required for Hg(II) methylation, consists of a
49
putative transmembrane domain and a corrinoid binding domain facing the cytosol,4,6 which
50
has been implicated with the transfer of methyl groups derived from one-carbon metabolic
51
processes to Hg(II).4,11 The uptake and transport of Hg(II) into the cytoplasm are thus
52
essential and thought to be controlled by certain metal transporters such as those related to
53
divalent metal uptake.10 Previous studies have proposed that neutral HgCl2 and Hg(HS)2
54
species passively diffuse into the cell, where they are methylated.12-15 However, recent
55
studies questioned this hypothesis and suggested that Hg(II) uptake is an active process
56
mediated by facilitated transport and exchange mechanisms.10,16-18 Certain thiols such as
57
cysteine were found to greatly enhance Hg(II) uptake and methylation in Geobacter
58
sulfurreducens, and it was proposed that G. sulfurreducens strains have a specific uptake
59
mechanism for the Hg(II)-cysteine complex.17 Additional studies, however, question this
60
hypothesis because cysteine enhanced methylation is found to be specific to microbial species
61
and depends on both the cysteine concentration and reaction time.7-9 For example, cysteine
62
was shown to inhibit Hg(II) methylation by a ∆omcBESTZ mutant of G. sulfurreducens PCA, 3
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 4 of 23
Page 5 of 23
Environmental Science & Technology
63
which is deficient in five outer-membrane c-type cytochromes required for dissimilatory
64
metal reduction.9 Thiols such as glutathione and penicillamine were found to enhance Hg(II)
65
methylation by D. desulfuricans ND132 but completely inhibited Hg(II) methylation by G.
66
sulfurreducens PCA.7,8,18 Recent studies with E. coli strains have also suggested that cells do
67
not take up the entire Hg-thiol complex, but rather the Hg(II) in the Hg-thiol complex is
68
transferred to a transport protein on the cell membrane and subsequently internalized.19
69
In pure culture studies, MeHg biosynthesis usually reaches a plateau within a few hours
70
to one day, and methylation often stalls even when a large quantity of inorganic Hg(II) exists
71
in the system.7,8,20,21 Previous studies speculated that this incomplete conversion of inorganic
72
Hg(II) to MeHg may result from the saturation of methylating enzymes22 or from limitations
73
in the methyl donor.8 However, subsequent studies ruled out this possibility because assays
74
conducted either with or without a carbon source, an electron donor/acceptor, or essential
75
nutrients showed little difference in Hg(II) methylation.8 Furthermore, Hg(II) methylation
76
rates by D. desulfuricans ND132 are proportional to added Hg(II) concentrations over a wide
77
range (0.25 to 40 nM),7,8 and starved cells methylate Hg(II) as quickly as cells provided with
78
energy-generating substrates, suggesting that energy requirements for the methylation of
79
nanomolar Hg(II) levels are small. Given these considerations, it was speculated that stalled
80
or incomplete Hg(II) methylation may be a result of Hg(II) conversion into a form that is
81
unavailable for intracellular uptake.8 Strong sorption of Hg(II) to cell surface binding sites
82
may serve as a sink for Hg(II), lowering its bioavailability. Moreover, competition between
83
cell surface sorption and intracellular uptake may limit Hg(II) methylation.
84
We hypothesize that Hg(II) cellular sorption is the main cause of limited Hg(II) 4
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
85
bioavailability, and that the presence of thiols can result in desorption or liberation of the
86
sorbed Hg(II) enhancing methylation. Using the strain Desulfovibrio desulfuricans ND132 as
87
a model organism,7 we examined the cellular sorption, desorption, and exchange of Hg(II) in
88
the presence or absence of thiol ligands including cysteine, glutathione (GSH), and
89
penicillamine (PEN). We propose that cellular binding and exchange of Hg(II) with these
90
complexing ligands in solution is an important controlling mechanism of Hg(II) uptake and
91
bioavailability in the environment.
92 93
MATERIALS AND METHODS
94
Bacterial culture and assay conditions
95
Desulfovibrio desulfuricans ND132 was cultured in a modified MOY medium containing
96
40 mM fumarate and 40 mM pyruvate at 30°C.20,23 Cells were harvested during the
97
mid-exponential phase with an optical density (OD) of 0.5 to 0.6 and washed three times by
98
repeated centrifugation (at 1200g, 10 min., 25°C) and resuspension in a deoxygenated
99
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at pH 7.4. PBS consisted of 0.14 M NaCl, 3 mM KCl, 10
100
mM Na2HPO4, and 2 mM KH2PO4. The buffer was first autoclaved and deoxygenated by
101
boiling and subsequently kept in an anaerobic glove chamber (Coy) with ~98% N2 and 2%
102
H2 for at least 24 h before use. All the washing steps and Hg(II) methylation assays were
103
conducted in the glove chamber as previously described.20,21
104
Hg(II) uptake and methylation assays
105
Hg(II) uptake and methylation assays were conducted in PBS in 4 mL amber glass vials
106
(National Scientific). Each vial contained washed ND132 cells (5×108 cell/mL), 5
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 6 of 23
Page 7 of 23
Environmental Science & Technology
107
supplemented once (at time zero) with 1 mM each of pyruvate and fumarate as the respective
108
electron donor and acceptor. The Hg(II) working solution was freshly prepared daily from a
109
stock solution of 50 µM HgCl2 in 1% HCl and added last to the cell suspension to provide a
110
final concentration of 25 nM Hg(II). All the vials were immediately sealed with a
111
PTFE/silicone screw cap and kept in the dark on an orbital shaker. At selected time points,
112
replicate sample vials (6-8) were taken out of the anoxic chamber and analyzed for Hg and
113
MeHg species distributions as follows. Half of the samples (3–4) were filtered through
114
0.2-µm syringe filters to remove cells and then preserved in HCl (0.5% v/v) at 4°C until
115
analysis. An aliquot (0.2–0.4 mL) was used to analyze the soluble MeHg (MeHgsol)
116
(described below). The remaining aliquot was oxidized with BrCl (5% v/v) overnight at 4°C
117
and analyzed for the total soluble Hg. Thus, the soluble inorganic Hg(II) (IHgsol) could be
118
calculated by the difference between total soluble Hg and MeHgsol.9,24 An aliquot of the
119
unfiltered sample (0.2–0.4 mL) was also analyzed for total Hg (HgT) following its oxidation
120
in
121
2,3-dimercapto-1-propanesulfonic acid (DMPS), a Hg-chelating agent, was added to each of
122
the remaining 3–4 samples (without filtration) to yield a final concentration of 100 µM
123
DMPS to wash off cell surface adsorbed Hg(II) (IHgad) and MeHg (MeHgad). Samples were
124
equilibrated for ~15 min and filtered, and the filter-passing solutions were analyzed for the
125
sum of wash-off soluble Hg: IHgwash (= IHgad + IHgsol) and MeHgwash (= MeHgad + MeHgsol),
126
as described above. The internalized or intracellular IHg (IHgcell) and MeHg (MeHgcell) were
127
calculated by the difference between IHgtotal or MeHgtotal and the wash-off IHgwash or
128
MeHgwash. All analytical errors were calculated as one standard deviation from 3 or more
BrCl
and
total
MeHg
(without
oxidation).
6
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Separately,
0.1
mL
of
Environmental Science & Technology
129
replicate samples of one or more batch experiments. For differences between 2 or more
130
measurements, the propagated errors were calculated as √ + , where a and b are the
131
analytical errors determined from measurements a and b, respectively.
132
Sequential addition of Hg isotopes and thiols and impact on methylation
133
To investigate whether the cells remained active and were able to methylate Hg after
134
reaching the methylation plateau (~24 h), different Hg isotopes were added sequentially to
135
the cell suspension at 0, 24, and 48 h. The washed cells were first incubated with 25 nM
136
201
Hg (as HgCl2) under the same conditions as described above. Another aliquot of 25 nM
137
202
Hg was added at time zero (i.e., with
138
Me202Hg production was determined at 72 h. To determine whether D. desulfuricans would
139
preferentially take up and methylate Hg(II)-thiol complexes, similar methylation assays were
140
performed by the sequential addition of pre-mixed 202Hg-cysteine complexes at various Hg(II)
141
to cysteine molar ratios (i.e., 1:0, 1:2, 1:10 and 1:100) 24 h after cells were first incubated
142
with 201Hg (without cysteine). Parallel experiments were performed by sequential additions of
143
cysteine taking place after cells were incubated with Hg(II) at various times. Additional
144
studies were carried out in a similar manner to determine the effects of thiols (cysteine, GSH,
145
or PEN, 50 µM each) on Hg methylation and species distribution.
146
Hg and MeHg analyses
201
Hg) or at 24 h and 48 h. Then, Me201Hg or
147
The total Hg was determined after samples were oxidized with BrCl overnight followed
148
by a reduction with SnCl2 using a Brooks Rand MERX automated system (Seattle, WA)
149
interfaced to an inductively couple plasma mass spectrometer (ICP-MS) (Elan-DRCe,
150
Perkin-Elmer, Inc. Shelton, CT).4,20,21 For 201Hg and 202Hg isotope analyses, ambient IHg was 7
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 8 of 23
Page 9 of 23
Environmental Science & Technology
151
added as an internal standard. MeHg was analyzed using a modified EPA Method 1630, with
152
Me200Hg added as an internal standard, as described previously.4,20,21 MeHg was first
153
extracted from the sample matrix via distillation, ethylation, and trapping on a Tenax column
154
via N2-puring. Thermal desorption and separation by gas chromatography were applied,
155
followed by the detection of Hg by ICP-MS. The recovery of spiked MeHg standards was
156
100±10%, and the detection limit was about 3×10-5 nM MeHg.
157 158
Results and Discussion
159
Hg(II) methylation and species distribution
160
Reactions between Hg(II) (as HgCl2, 25 nM) and washed cells of D. desulfuricans
161
ND132 (5×108 cells/mL) in PBS resulted in rapid MeHg production within hours, and about
162
28% of the Hg(II) was converted to MeHg (as MeHgtotal) within 24 h (Figure 1a). However,
163
methylation stalled or approached a plateau after 24 h, although a large percentage of the
164
Hg(II) (~72% IHgtotal) was in the system (Figure 1b). An analysis of the total Hg (MeHgtotal +
165
IHgtotal) in cell suspension indicated a good mass balance (Figure 1b), suggesting that loss of
166
Hg(II) to container walls was small (within 2–7%), as previously reported.20,25 Additionally,
167
we did not observe Hg(II) reduction or loss of Hg(0). The observed methylation activity is
168
however consistent with previous studies with an as yet unexplained mechanism.7,8,21,24
169
To elucidate this mechanism, we determined Hg(II) and MeHg sorption or uptake and
170
species distribution on cells using DMPS as an effective washing agent for distinguishing
171
cell-surface adsorbed Hg(II) or MeHg from those entered inside the cells.18,25 DMPS is a
172
strong chelator for Hg(II),26 owing to its two ortho-positioned –SH functional groups. The 8
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
173
presence of as little as 50 µM DMPS effectively prevented Hg(II) sorption, uptake or
174
methylation by ND132 cells, resulting in ~100% of the added Hg(II) in solution (SI Figure
175
S1a). When Hg(II) was reacted with the cells first, the sorbed Hg(II) could also be mostly
176
desorbed after washing with 100 µM DMPS (SI Figure S1b). Additionally, the cells showed
177
no interaction or uptake of DMPS, probably because of its negatively charged sulfonate head
178
group (SI Figure S1b). Using this technique, we demonstrated that MeHg was rapidly
179
exported to the solution phase (~80% of the synthesized MeHg), leaving a small percentage
180
either adsorbed on or remaining inside the cells (Figure 1a). For inorganic Hg(II), a large
181
portion (IHgcell, ~90% of the total IHg) was rapidly internalized into the cell and could not be
182
washed off with DMPS (Figure 1b). Only a small percentage of the IHg (~5%) was sorbed on
183
the cell surface. As a result, the soluble Hg(II) (IHgsol) decreased concomitantly to < 10%
184
after 6 h. These results suggest that the internalized IHgcell must be immobilized to
185
intracellular materials and thus unavailable for methylation after 24 h.
186
We further examined if the stalled methylation may result from decreased microbial
187
activity after 24 h. In this experiment, MeHg production and Hg species distribution were
188
followed using stable isotopes of
189
either together or sequentially, with one of the isotopes (202Hg) added 24 h after cells were
190
incubated with the
191
amounts of Me201Hg and Me202Hg (~6 nM or 25%) were produced after 3 days (SI Figure
192
S2a, left columns), as expected. The distribution of IHg species after 72 h was also similar
193
(SI Figure S2b, left columns). When
194
201
201
201
Hg and 202Hg (as HgCl2, 25 nM each). They were added
Hg isotope. When both isotopes were added at time zero, similar
202
Hg was added 24 h after cells were incubated with
Hg, slightly lower amounts of Me202Hg (~4.5 nM or 19%) were produced (SI Figure S2a, 9
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 10 of 23
Page 11 of 23
Environmental Science & Technology
195
middle columns), indicating that cells remained active and were still capable of methylating
196
similar amounts of Hg(II). Slightly higher amounts of Me201Hg were formed because
197
was added at time zero; the addition of
198
previously complexed
199
48 h (after the first addition of
200
202
201
much as those formed with one-time addition of 202Hg at time zero or at 24 h (SI Figure S2a,
202
right columns). These results clearly indicate that the stalled methylation activity after 24 h
203
(Figure 1) cannot be attributed to loss of microbial activity, but rather to a limited availability
204
of substrate or Hg(II); cells remained active methylating Hg(II) for at least 3 days.
205
Effects of thiols on Hg(II) species distribution and enhanced methylation
201
202
Hg
Hg may have displaced or mobilized some
Hg inside the cell. When another aliquot of 202
201
202
Hg(II) was added at
Hg at 24 h), cells again methylated a similar amount of
Hg and produced a total of 11 nM
202
MeHg the next day; this amount was about twice as
206
Complexes between Hg(II) and thiols such as cysteine and glutathione can enhance
207
methylation by D. desulfuricans ND132,8,18,23 but it is unclear whether enhanced methylation
208
results from preferential cellular uptake of Hg(II)-thiol complexes, or from thiol-induced
209
desorption and thus increased Hg(II) bioavailability, or both. Our results indicate that, when
210
Hg(II) methylation reached its plateau at 24 h, addition of cysteine (50 µM) nearly doubled
211
MeHg production, and more than 50% of the Hg(II) became methylated (Figure 2a). Addition
212
of a higher concentration of cysteine (500 µM) resulted in more MeHg production (~70%)
213
(Figure 2a), but sequential addition of the same concentration of cysteine (50 µM or 500 µM)
214
at 48 h yielded only slightly increased MeHg production. Furthermore, similar amounts of
215
MeHg were produced regardless of whether cysteine was added with Hg(II) at time zero or at
216
a later time (i.e., 2 or 24 h after cells were incubated with Hg[II]) (Figure 2b). These 10
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 12 of 23
217
observations confirm that the stalled Hg(II) methylation is largely a result of Hg(II) binding
218
to cellular materials because the stalled methylation could be restored by the addition of
219
thiols (e.g., cysteine), regardless of whether the thiol is added along with Hg(II) at time zero
220
or after Hg(II) is immobilized on the cells. Relatively high thiol concentrations were more
221
effective in desorbing or mobilizing the sorbed Hg(II) and thus produced more MeHg. We also determined Hg(II) methylation by incubating cells with pre-mixed
222 223
202
224
after cells were first reacted with
225
These experiments were designed to further clarify whether the thiol-enhanced Hg(II)
226
methylation is a result of preferential uptake of the Hg(II)-thiol complexes or of thiol induced
227
mobilization of the cell-bound Hg(II). Speciation calculations indicate that 1:1 Hg-cysteine
228
complexes dominate (72–97%) at Hg:Cysteine ratios of 1:10 or higher, and 1:2 complexes
229
dominate (74%) at the Hg:Cysteine ratio of 1:100 in PBS.9,17 Compared to samples without
230
cysteine (or Hg:Cysteine at 1:0, Figure 2c), the addition of
231
1:100 Hg:Cysteine) slightly increased the production of Me201Hg 24 h after cells reacted with
232
201
233
increase was small and remained unchanged at Hg:Cysteine ratios between 1:2 and 1:100.
234
There was also a negligible increase in Me202Hg production at Hg:Cysteine ratios between
235
1:0 and 1:10, and only a slight increase in methylation at the Hg:Cysteine ratio of 1:100
236
(Figure 2c). These results indicate that, even with an excess amount of cysteine, a low
237
cysteine concentration (< 2.5 µM, or 1:100 Hg:Cysteine) is ineffective in enhancing Hg(II)
238
methylation, as observed in a previous study.9 High thiol concentrations are necessary to
Hg-cysteine complexes at various Hg(II) to cysteine molar ratios (i.e. 1:2, 1:10 and 1:100) 201
Hg for 24 h (or approached its methylation plateau).
202
Hg-cysteine complexes (1:2 to
Hg (Figure 2c), since cysteine may have mobilized some cell-bound
11
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
201
Hg. However, this
Page 13 of 23
Environmental Science & Technology
239
result in mass action or ligand exchange and desorption of the sorbed Hg(II) (Figure 2a). The
240
results thus support the notion that Hg(II)-cysteine complexes are not the preferred species
241
for Hg(II) uptake and methylation. Instead, the observed enhancement of Hg(II) methylation
242
by thiols is caused mainly by remobilizing or exchanging the cell-bound Hgcell. This
243
observation corroborates with the proposed uptake mechanism of Hg(II) in the Hg-thiol
244
complex by the E. coli strain.19
245
The effect of cysteine or thiols in mobilizing cellular bound Hg(II) is further illustrated
246
by detailed studies of Hg(II) methylation and species distribution during Hg-cell interactions
247
(Figure 3; SI Figure S3). Compared to experiments without cysteine addition (Figure 1),
248
Hg(II) methylation increased substantially when a large excess amount of cysteine (50 µM)
249
was added 2 h after commencing the Hg(II) methylation assay (Figure 3a). After 24 h the
250
total MeHg production increased to ~53% of the total Hg added, or ~2 times higher than that
251
in the absence of cysteine. Similarly, we found that most of the synthesized MeHg was
252
exported to the extracellular environment, leaving only a small percentage either sorbed
253
(MeHgad) or remaining inside the cells (MeHgcell) (Figure 3a). Most of the added inorganic
254
Hg(II) was either taken up (IHgcell) or methylated, and little IHg (