Subscriber access provided by TEXAS A&M INTL UNIV
Article
Effects of Graphene Oxide and Oxidized Carbon Nanotubes on the Cellular Division, Microstructure, Uptake, Oxidative Stress and Metabolic Profiles Xiangang Hu, Shaohu Ouyang, Li Mu, Jing An, and Qixing Zhou Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b02102 • Publication Date (Web): 21 Aug 2015 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on August 25, 2015
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
Environmental Science & Technology is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 28
Environmental Science & Technology
1
Effects of Graphene Oxide and Oxidized Carbon Nanotubes on the Cellular
2
Division, Microstructure, Uptake, Oxidative Stress and Metabolic Profiles
3 4 5
Xiangang Hu†, Shaohu Ouyang†, Li Mu‡, Jing An§, Qixing Zhou*, †
6 7
†
8
Education)/Tianjin Key Laboratory of Environmental Remediation and Pollution
9
Control, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nankai University,
Key Laboratory of Pollution Processes and Environmental Criteria (Ministry of
10
Tianjin 300071, China.
11
‡
12
China.
13
§
14
Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China.
Institute of Agro-environmental Protection, Ministry of Agriculture, Tianjin 300191,
Key Laboratory of Pollution Ecology and Environment Engineering, Institute of
15 16
ABSTRACT
17
Nanomaterial oxides are common formations of nanomaterials in the natural
18
environment. Herein, the nanotoxicology of typical graphene oxide (GO) and
19
carboxyl single-walled carbon nanotubes (C-SWCNT) was compared. The results
20
showed that cell division of Chlorella vulgaris was promoted at 24 h and then
21
inhibited at 96 h after nanomaterial exposure. At 96 h, GO and C-SWCNT inhibited
22
the rates of cell division by 0.08–15% and 0.8–28.3%, respectively. Both GO and C-
23
SWCNT covered the cell surface, but the uptake percentage of C-SWCNT was 2-fold
24
higher than that of GO. C-SWCNT induced stronger plasmolysis and mitochondrial
25
membrane potential loss and decreased the cell viability to a greater extent than GO.
26
Moreover, C-SWCNT-exposed cells exhibited more starch grains and lysosome
27
formation and higher reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels than GO-exposed cells.
28
Metabolomics analysis revealed significant differences in the metabolic profiles
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
29
among the control, C-SWCNT and GO groups. The metabolisms of alkanes, lysine,
30
octadecadienoic acid and valine was associated with ROS and could be considered as
31
new biomarkers of ROS. The nanotoxicological mechanisms involved the inhibition
32
of fatty acid, amino acid and small molecule acid metabolisms. These findings
33
provide new insights into the effects of GO and C-SWCNT on cellular responses.
34
.
35 36
KEYWORDS: Graphene oxide; Carbon nanotube; Nanotoxicology; Phytotoxicity;
37
ROS; Metabolism
38 39
INTRODUCTION
40
The dramatic development of carbon nanoscience and nanotechnology in recent years
41
has offered numerous opportunities and innovative solutions in various fields and
42
applications. Of the carbonaceous nanomaterials, carbon nanotubes and graphene
43
have been more widely and rapidly developed compared with other materials.1-3
44
Carbon nanotubes are commonly referred to as rolled up graphene sheets, and both
45
allotropes have a meshwork of sp2-hybridized carbon atoms. However, it remains
46
unknown which form is ecologically safer. Notably, carbon nanomaterials commonly
47
form oxides in the natural environment; for example, pristine carbon nanotubes and
48
graphene are transformed into carboxyl single-walled carbon nanotubes (C-SWCNT)
49
and graphene oxide (GO) in aqueous solution under visible light irradiation,
50
respectively.4-6 Herein, the nanotoxicology of GO and C-SWCNT is compared.
51
Although a direct comparison of GO and C-SWCNT phytotoxicity has not been
52
reported, both materials have adverse effects on organisms. C-SWCNT inhibit growth
53
and photosynthetic activity in alga to a greater extent than pristine carbon nanotubes.7
54
Similarly, GO damages cellular structures and chlorophyll synthesis in wheat.6 It has
55
been proposed that carbonaceous nanomaterials aggregate on cell surfaces and hinder
56
cell hydraulic conductivity and water availability, thus reducing transpiration and
57
affecting plant development.8 In contrast to animal cells, plant cells have a
58
semipermeable cell wall that serves as an extra protective barrier against
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 2 of 28
Page 3 of 28
Environmental Science & Technology
59
nanomaterials.9,10 Because cell wall pores have a diameter of less than 10 nm, the
60
internalization of large carbonaceous nanomaterials is still a controversial issue.11,12 In
61
the present work, C. vulgaris was used as a model organism, and a Raman
62
spectrometer was employed to identify the internalization of GO and C-SWCNT. In
63
addition, the microstructural damage and cell viability defects in algal cells were
64
analyzed using electron microscopy and fluorescent probes.
65
Phytotoxicity tests of nanomaterials typically involve examinations of plant
66
development, antioxidase activities, and gene or protein alterations.13,14 In contrast to
67
genes and proteins, metabolites serve as direct signatures of biochemical activity and
68
are readily correlated with cellular biochemistry and biological phenomena.15-17 In
69
addition, alterations in reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels are a common indicator
70
of nanotoxicity.18 Understanding the metabolic mechanisms of ROS generation is
71
critical for controlling nanotoxicity through the regulation of the corresponding
72
metabolic pathways. However, the mechanisms of ROS generation by nanomaterials
73
at a metabolomic level remain unclear. In the present study, we analyzed the ROS
74
levels and mitochondrial membrane potential losses in algal cells. Moreover, the
75
comparative metabolomics of GO and C-SWCNT were examined, relationships
76
between ROS levels and metabolites were established, alterations in key metabolic
77
pathways were identified, and nanotoxicological mechanisms were elucidated.
78 79
MATERIALS AND METHODS
80
Characterization of materials
81
GO (product number XF002-1) and C-SWCNT (product number S07) were purchased
82
from the Nanjing XFNANO Materials Tech Co., Ltd., China. The morphology of GO
83
and C-SWCNT was examined using field emission transmission electron microscopy
84
(JEM-2010 FEF, JEOL, Japan) and atomic force microscopy (Nanoscope IV, VEECO,
85
USA). The size distribution and zeta potential of the nanomaterials were measured
86
using a ZETAPALS/BI-200SM instrument equipped with a 30-mW, 635-nm laser
87
(Brookhaven Instruments Corporation, USA). The surface chemistry was analyzed via
88
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). XPS measurements were performed using
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
89
an Axis Ultra XPS system (Kratos, Japan) with a monochromatic Al Kα X-ray source
90
(1486.6 eV). The XPS spectra were analyzed using Casa-XPS V2.3.13 software.
91
Nanomaterials were dispersed in algal medium, and the redox potential of these
92
particles was measured using an oxidation-reduction potentiometer (Sinomeasure,
93
China). The hydrodynamic diameters and ζ-potential of the nanomaterials in algal
94
medium were obtained using a dynamic light scattering machine equipped with a 30-
95
mW, 657-nm laser (ZetaPALS, Brookhaven Instruments Corporation, USA). Electron
96
paramagnetic resonance (EPR) was performed to measure unpaired electrons. All X-
97
band EPR spectra were collected at room temperature (296 K) using a Magnettech
98
MiniScope 400 EPR spectrometer operated at a microwave frequency of 9.4 GHz and
99
a magnetic field modulation frequency of 100 kHz. The spectrometer was controlled
100
using MiniScope Control software. We used 2,6,6-tetramethyl-1-piperidinyloxy
101
(TEMPO) as an unpaired electron probe. The samples were individually placed in
102
quartz EPR tubes. Before the samples were loaded, the quartz EPR tubes were
103
thoroughly washed with ultrapure water and subsequently dried.
104
Cultivation of algal cells
105
C. vulgaris was obtained from the Freshwater Algae Culture Collection at the Institute
106
of Hydrobiology, Wuhan, China. The algae were cultured in an illumination incubator
107
(Shanghai Bank Equipment, LRH-250 Gb, China) at 24.0 ± 0.5°C and 80% humidity.
108
The current and future concentrations of GO or C-SWCNT in the natural environment
109
are unknown. To compare the reported concentrations of carbonaceous nanomaterials
110
in toxicological tests,7,19 C. vulgaris were exposed to 0.01–10 mg/L GO and C-
111
SWCNT in 250 mL glass flasks containing 100 mL of BG-11 medium. The
112
components of BG-11 medium are listed in Table S1. The initial cell density was 6.48
113
× 104 cells/mL. Algal cells exposed to nanomaterials were counted using a cell
114
counter 24, 48, 72 and 96 h (CASY TT, Innovatis, Germany). Chlorophyll a was
115
measured using a UV–vis spectrophotometer (TU-1900, Beijing Purkinje General
116
Instrument, China), as previously described.20 To detect alterations in the DNA
117
concentration, the algal suspension was washed three times using BG-11 medium and
118
then centrifuged at 9000 g for 5 min. The pellet was collected and analyzed using a
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 4 of 28
Page 5 of 28
Environmental Science & Technology
119
DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (product number 69104, QIAGEN, China) according to the
120
manufacturer’s instructions.
121
Electron microscopy observation
122
For scanning electron microscopy (SEM), 5-mL algal suspensions were centrifuged,
123
chemically fixed for 2 h using 2.5% glutaraldehyde, washed three times using BG-11
124
medium, and postfixed in 1% osmium tetroxide for 2 h. Subsequently, the samples
125
were dehydrated in a graded ethanol series (30%, 50%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 95% and
126
100%), washed with tert-butyl alcohol and dried under vacuum. Images were obtained
127
using SEM (SU8010, Hitachi, Japan). For cellular ultrastructure observation, the algal
128
suspensions were centrifuged, washed, fixed, postfixed and dehydrated as described
129
above for the SEM sample preparation, and they were subsequently embedded in
130
epoxy resin. Ultrathin sections (70–90 nm) of algal cells were obtained using a
131
diamond knife (EM FC7, Leica, Germany), followed by staining with uranyl acetate
132
and lead citrate for 15 min. The samples were observed using a transmission electron
133
microscope (TEM) (HT7700, Hitachi, Japan).
134
Raman spectra
135
Raman spectra (RS) were generated to analyze the surface chemistry of the cells. The
136
cells were washed three times with fresh BG-11 medium, placed on glass slides, and
137
analyzed using a Raman spectrometer (Renishaw plc, UK) with excitation at 780 nm
138
from a diode-pumped solid-state (DPSS) laser (DXR, Thermo Scientific, USA).
139
Subsequently, RS were generated to quantify the nanomaterials in cells.21,22 Prior to
140
quantifying GO and C-SWCNT in cells, a homogeneous algal matrix was obtained
141
using a cell disruptor (Sonifier 250A, Branson, China). GO and C-SWCNT were
142
spiked into the cellular matrix to prepare standard curves. The water in the samples
143
was removed through lyophilization. The specific G bands of GO and C-SWCNT
144
were recorded through Raman microscopy using a 780-nm laser (DXR, Thermo
145
Scientific, USA).
146
Cell viability
147
Cell viability was determined using a fluorescein diacetate (FDA) probe. The algal
148
cell suspension was centrifuged and washed three times with BG-11 medium.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
149
Subsequently, 1 mmol/L FDA was incubated with algal cells for 30 min under dark
150
conditions at room temperature. The samples were centrifuged and washed three
151
times with BG-11 medium. The fluorescence intensity was measured on a
152
fluorescence microscope (Olympus IX71, Olympus, Japan) with an excitation
153
wavelength of 485 nm and an emission wavelength of 521 nm. The fluorescence
154
images were obtained on a 100 W light source intensity, a 1.3 numerical aperture, a
155
100 × objective, a 60 s exposure time and a 1.0 detector gain. The pixel intensity
156
measurements were taken overall field of view (whole image).
157
ROS and superoxide dismutase
158
2′,7′-Dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA) was used as a fluorescent
159
probe to measure the intracellular ROS. Briefly, algal cells were centrifuged and
160
washed three times with BG-11 medium. The algal suspension was incubated with 10
161
μmol/L DCFH-DA in the dark at 25°C for 30 min, followed by washing three times
162
with BG-11 medium. The fluorescence intensity was measured using a fluorescence
163
spectrophotometer (LS55, Perkin Elmer, USA) with an excitation wavelength of 485
164
nm and an emission wavelength of 530 nm. The relative ROS level was represented
165
as the fluorescence intensity ratio of the exposure group to the control group.
166
Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity was determined using a SOD assay kit (A001-2,
167
Nanjing JianCheng Bioengineering Institute, China). The assay was conducted
168
according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and the absorbance was read at 450 nm
169
using a UV–vis spectrophotometer (TU-1900, Beijing Purkinje General Instrument,
170
China).
171
Mitochondrial membrane potential
172
The algal suspension was centrifuged, and the pellets were washed three times with
173
BG-11 medium. Subsequently, the cell pellets were incubated with 10 mmol/L JC-1
174
(tetrachloro-tetraethyl benzimidazol carbocyanine iodide) at 37°C for 30 min in the
175
dark. Before observation, the algal cells were washed three times with BG-11
176
medium. The JC-1-stained algal cells were cultivated in BG-11 medium and observed
177
using fluorescence microscopy (Olympus IX71, Olympus, Japan). The double-
178
excitation wavelengths were 485 nm and 521 nm, and the corresponding green and
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 6 of 28
Page 7 of 28
Environmental Science & Technology
179
red fluorescence levels were detected at 530 nm and 590 nm. Mitochondrial
180
membrane potential loss was quantified as the ratio of red to green fluorescence
181
intensity, and the relevant analysis was performed using Image J software.
182
Metabolic profile
183
The metabolites were analyzed through gas chromatography-mass spectrometry
184
(GC−MS), and samples were prepared using the derivatization method. Cell
185
metabolism was terminated at 96 h using liquid nitrogen, and subsequently, the cell
186
wall/membrane was lysed through repeated freeze-thawing using liquid nitrogen. The
187
metabolites were extracted from the algal matrix using a methanol:chloroform:water
188
solution (2 mL, 2.5:1:1 volume ratio) via ultrasound (300 W, 10 min) in an ice bath,
189
followed by centrifugation to collect the supernatant. The pellet was extracted,
190
centrifuged again and mixed with the first supernatant. Subsequently, water (500 μL)
191
was added, and the mixture was centrifuged at 5000 g for 3 min. Methanol and water
192
were removed from the upper layer via nitrogen blow-off and lyophilization,
193
respectively. The lower layer of chloroform was also removed via nitrogen blow-off.
194
Methoxamine hydrochloride (20 mg/mL, 50 μL) and N-methyl-N-(trimethylsilyl)
195
trifluoroacetamide (80 μL) were used as derivatives. The samples (1 μL) were
196
injected into the GC column in split mode (1:5). The GC (Agilent 6890N, Agilent,
197
USA) was linked to a quadrupole MS (Agilent 5973, Agilent, USA). Metabolite
198
separation was conducted on a DB-5 MS capillary column (30 m, 0.25 mm i.d., 0.25
199
mm film thickness). The injection temperature was 230°C, and the transfer line and
200
ion source were set at 250°C. The spectrometer was operated in electron-impact
201
mode. The detection voltage was 2100 V. The full scan range was from 60 to 800
202
amu. Helium was used as the carrier gas at a constant flow rate of 2 mL/min. The
203
oven temperature was maintained at 80°C for 2 min and subsequently increased at a
204
rate of 15°C/min to 320°C, with holding for 6 min. The metabolites were identified
205
using the NIST 08 library.
206
Statistical analysis
207
All experiments were performed at least in triplicate, and the results are presented as
208
the means ± standard deviation, except for the specific annotation. Differences were
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
209
regarded as significant at P < 0.05. The data were analyzed using one-way analysis of
210
variance (ANOVA) and compared using Tukey’s test. Orthogonal partial least squares
211
discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) was performed using SIMCA-P 11.5 software. The
212
thermal map was drawn using MeV 4.8.1 software. The default distance metric for
213
hierarchical clustering (HCL) was the Pearson correlation, and the linkage method
214
selection was achieved through average linkage clustering.
215 216
RESULTS and DISCUSSION
217
Nanomaterial characteristics
218
Given that nanomaterial toxicity is determined based on physical properties, the
219
morphology, ζ-potential, relative size, surface chemistry and chemical reactivity of
220
GO and C-SWCNT were analyzed. GO and C-SWCNT presented nanosheet and
221
nanotube morphologies, respectively, as shown in Figures S1 and S2. The lateral
222
length and thickness of GO were approximately 0.5–5 μm and 0.8–1.2 nm,
223
respectively. The outer diameter, inner diameter and length of C-SWCNT were
224
approximately 1–2 nm, 0.8–1.6 and 0.5–3 μm, respectively. To directly compare the
225
sizes of GO and C-SWCNT, the relative hydrodynamic diameters of the
226
nanomaterials were measured using dynamic light scattering based on the zero-
227
dimension spherical particle model. As shown in Figure S3a, the relative
228
hydrodynamic diameters of GO and C-SWCNT were 295–825 nm and 396–712 nm,
229
respectively. The ζ-potential was used to study the dispersion of nanomaterials. As
230
shown in Figure S3b, the ζ-potential of both materials decreased with increasing pH.
231
At the environmentally relevant pH range of 5–11, the ζ-potentials of GO and C-
232
SWCNT were similar and presented negative charges. The surface chemistry of
233
nanomaterials controls their dispersion and direct interactions with cells. The results
234
for XPS, shown in Figure S4, showed that the spectrum of GO comprised 67.2% C1s,
235
30.4% O1s, and 2.4% S2p (based on the percentages of atoms). The spectrum of C-
236
SWCNT comprised 62.7% C1s, 29.4% O1s, 7.2% Na1s, and 0.7% Cl2p. The similar
237
ratios of C1s to O1s in GO and C-SWCNT are consistent with the dispersity of these
238
materials, as shown in Figure S3b.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 8 of 28
Page 9 of 28
239
Environmental Science & Technology
In Figure S3b, limited amounts of S, Na and Cl were obtained during material
240
fabrication. It has been suggested that the impurities in graphene and carbon
241
nanotubes influence the redox properties of these compounds.23 Nanomaterials with
242
redox potentials higher or lower than those of biologically active redox couples will
243
disturb the redox homeostasis in vivo and induce serious cellular responses.24 In
244
Figure S5a, the redox potentials of GO and C-SWCNT in algal medium were similar,
245
ranging from 109–385 mV and from 133–247 mV, respectively. To further explore the
246
chemical activity of the nanomaterials, their unpaired electrons were studied.
247
Unpaired electrons influence the purity of nanomaterials and directly affect the
248
chemical activity and nanotoxicity of these materials.25,26 To measure the unpaired
249
electrons of the nanomaterials, EPR was performed, using TEMPO as an unpaired
250
electron probe. As shown in Figure S5b and S5c, GO exerted a limited influence on
251
the EPR signals and slightly reduced these signals, which was consistent with the
252
results presented in a previous work.27 In contrast, C-SWCNT at 10 mg/L slightly
253
promoted EPR signals. Compared with ζ-potentials, surface chemistry and chemical
254
activities, morphology may be more responsible for the difference between GO and
255
C-SWCNT.
256 257
Cell division
258
The initial number of cells (6.48 × 104/mL) increased after 24 h, as shown in Figure
259
S6a. During this period, cell division was slightly increased by the nanomaterials in a
260
concentration-dependent manner. At 48 h, as shown in Figure S6a, the number of cells
261
continued to increase, while cell division was disturbed in response to the
262
nanomaterials. Specifically, the cell number increased when cells were exposed to 0.1
263
and 1 mg/L GO for 48 h; however, cells exposed to 10 mg/L GO did not show
264
significant differences compared with the control. At 72 h, as shown in Figure S6b,
265
the nanomaterials increased cell division, except at the highest concentration of 10
266
mg/L. The inhibitory effects were obvious at 96 h, with 0.08–15% and 0.8–28.3%
267
inhibition for GO and C-SWCNT, respectively, compared with the control. Notably, at
268
1 and 10 mg/L, C-SWCNT induced more obvious inhibition than GO. The above
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
269
results showed that the tested nanomaterials first promoted and then inhibited algal
270
cell division, and C-SWCNT led to more remarkable inhibition of cell division than
271
GO after 48 h. Given that DNA replication is critical for cell growth, DNA
272
concentrations were investigated, as shown in Figure S7. At the lowest concentration
273
(0.1 mg/L), GO and C-SWCNT did not significantly inhibit DNA replication
274
compared with the control, while both nanomaterials inhibited DNA replication at the
275
highest concentration tested (10 mg/L). At the intermediate concentration (1 mg/L),
276
DNA replication was significantly inhibited by C-SWCNT.
277 278
Modification of the cellular surface
279
As shown in Figure S8a–c, the diameters of the cells were approximately 4–5 μm in
280
all images. In the control group, shown in Figure S8a, irregular wrinkles were
281
distributed on the surfaces of the cells, forming lateral grooves of approximately 0.5–
282
1 μm in length. In the GO and C-SWCNT groups, shown in Figures S8b and S8c,
283
foreign structures likely covered the cell surface, and the grooves were filled and
284
invisible, as denoted with red arrows. In addition, some cells exposed to C-SWCNT
285
were completely damaged, as denoted with yellow arrows in Figure S8c. To clarify
286
the chemical composition of the foreign structures covering the cell surface in Figure
287
S8b and S8c, RS was performed, as shown in Figure S8d. The typical D and G peaks
288
of carbonaceous nanomaterials centered at 1312 cm-1 and 1585 cm-1, respectively,
289
were detected on cells exposed to GO and C-SWCNT, indicating that both carbon
290
nanomaterials were adsorbed onto the cells. GO and C-SWCNT with large specific
291
surfaces have C=C and oxygen/hydrogen-containing groups and are easily adsorbed
292
onto cells via π-π stacking, hydrogen bonds or electrostatic interactions.28
293 294
Cellular ultrastructure and nanomaterial uptake
295
To compare the damage to the cellular ultrastructure between cells exposed to GO and
296
those exposed to C-SWCNT, TEM was performed, as shown in Figure 1a–c. The
297
ultrastructural morphology of the control cells was not damaged, as the cell wall,
298
plasma membrane, chloroplast, nucleus and other cytoplasmic compartments were
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 10 of 28
Page 11 of 28
Environmental Science & Technology
299
intact. Two apparent physiological changes in cells exposed to GO and C-SWCNT
300
were plasmolysis and increases in the number of starch grains and the number of
301
lysosomes. Shrinkage of the cytoplasm contributed to plasmolysis, as indicated by the
302
irregular morphology of the plasma membrane edges (the metabolic mechanisms of
303
plasma membrane damage are explored in the last section of this work). The
304
shrinkage of the cytoplasm in C-SWCNT-exposed cells was more intense than that in
305
GO-exposed cells. Furthermore, C-SWCNT entered into the space created by
306
plasmolysis and the cytoplasm, as indicated by green and yellow arrows, respectively.
307
A significantly large amount of GO was not observed in the algal TEM images (n =
308
15), although a small amount of GO might have entered the cells (the uptake of GO
309
and C-SWCNT is quantified in the next section). The increase in the number of starch
310
grains and the number of lysosomes was considered a self-defense strategy in these
311
cells,29,30 and the increase in the number of lysosomes was remarkably observed only
312
in C-SWCNT-exposed cells. Moreover, thylakoid structures were obscured in GO-
313
and C-SWCNT-exposed cells, demonstrating the destruction of the chloroplasts.
314
RS were used to identify and quantify GO and C-SWCNT in algal cells.21,22 As
315
shown in Figure 1d, the typical G band from the sp2 structure of C-SWCNT was
316
identified in both the algal matrix spiked with C-SWCNT and in the samples,
317
confirming the uptake of C-SWCNT in the TEM image. In GO-exposed cells, the G
318
band was also detected, but the peak shapes were influenced by carbohydrates. A
319
more obvious influence of carbohydrates was observed in GO-exposed cells, likely
320
reflecting the fact that carbohydrates can more readily adhere to nanosheets of GO
321
than to C-SWCNT.31 Standard curves for the quantification of GO and C-SWCNT in
322
cells were prepared through the detection of nanomaterials spiked in the algal matrix
323
using RS.21,22 The concentrations of GO and C-SWCNT were 2.66 and 9.51 mg/g,
324
respectively, in alga when the cells were exposed to 10 mg/L GO or C-SWCNT. The
325
uptake percentages (ratios of nanomaterial mass in cells to the total nanomaterial
326
mass) of GO and C-SWCNT were 11% and 26%, respectively. These results directly
327
confirm that C-SWCNT cellular uptake occurs more readily than GO uptake.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
328
The TEM images illustrate the endocytosis pathway of C-SWCNT across the
329
biological membrane, denoted as yellow arrows in Figure 1c. In addition to
330
endocytosis, the enhancement of diffusion due to cell membrane damage was
331
considered an additional pathway for nanomaterial translocation across the cell
332
membrane.32,33 Plasmolysis and shrinkage of the cytoplasm in the TEM images was
333
associated with an dncrease in cell viability in C-SWCNT-exposed cells. Cell viability
334
was analyzed, as shown in Figure S9. There was no significant difference between the
335
controls and cells exposed to GO, except at 1 mg/L. In contrast, the fluorescence
336
intensity significantly increased by 12.5% and 45.7% upon exposure to 1 and 10 mg/L
337
of C-SWCNT, respectively, demonstrating the remarkable decrease in cell viability.
338
These results are consistent with the uptake of nanomaterials.
339 340
Oxidative stress
341
As shown in Figure 2a, both GO and C-SWCNT significantly promoted the
342
generation of ROS in the range of 0.01–10 mg/L. The fluorescence intensities of GO
343
and C-SWCNT were 15.5–52.1% and 29.0–100.9% higher than the control,
344
respectively. At the tested concentration range of 0.01–10 mg/L, C-SWCNT induced
345
significantly higher ROS levels than GO. SOD is a critical antioxidant enzyme that
346
maintains redox balance in vivo. As presented in Figure 2b, there were no significant
347
differences in SOD activity between the control and GO-exposed cells, except at the
348
higher concentrations of 1 and 10 mg/L. In contrast, C-SWCNT significantly
349
enhanced SOD levels at concentrations from 0.01 to 10 mg/L. The up-regulation of
350
SOD levels was consistent with an increase in ROS induced in response to exposure
351
to nanomaterials. It has been suggested that a high level of oxidative stress influences
352
the biosynthesis of chlorophyll a.34 However, there was no significant difference in
353
the chlorophyll a contents in the tested groups, except for the group exposed to C-
354
SWCNT at 10 mg/L, which showed a significant reduction in chlorophyll a content.
355
Mitotoxicity is a pathway for increasing oxidative stress.35 The results of
356
mitochondrial membrane potential loss are presented in Figure 2d–g. Compared with
357
the control, the ratios of red to green fluorescence intensity significantly decreased by
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 12 of 28
Page 13 of 28
Environmental Science & Technology
358
11.1% (P = 0.024) and 30.5% (P < 0.01) in response to GO and C-SWCNT exposure,
359
respectively, indicating that C-SWCNT triggered a greater loss of mitochondrial
360
membrane potential than GO.
361 362
Metabolic profile
363
In the fields of nanotoxicology and nanomedicine, the potential unique benefits of
364
applying metabolomics have only recently been recognized.36,37 To determine the
365
effects of GO and C-SWCNT exposure on the metabolic profile, a total of 66
366
metabolites were analyzed using GC-MS, as shown in Tables S2 and S3. Compared
367
with previous metabolic analyses (e.g., 1H NMR technology), GC-MS with
368
derivatization is effective for analyzing metabolites in microalgae.38,39 The identified
369
metabolites were involved in major metabolic pathways, including carbohydrate,
370
amino acid, fatty acid, urea and small molecule acid metabolic pathways. The HCL
371
algorithm is a powerful approach for grouping metabolites based on similarities in
372
their components. HCL was performed with average linkage and Pearson correlation
373
analyses, and the results are summarized in the dendrogram shown in Figure 3, in
374
which the pattern of the branches reflects the relatedness of the samples. Using HCL
375
analysis, the samples were divided into two clusters: control/GO0.01/C-SWCNT0.01
376
and GO0.1/GO1/GO10/C-SWCNT0.1/C-SWCNT1/C-SWCNT10. The latter cluster
377
was divided into two sub-clusters: GO0.1/GO1/GO10 and C-SWCNT0.1/C-
378
SWCNT1/C-SWCNT10. HCL analysis supported distinctions in the metabolic
379
profiles among the control, GO and C-SWCNT groups. Furthermore, ANOVA,
380
followed by Tukey’s test, suggested that the metabolic profiles of GO10, C-
381
SWCNT0.1, C-SWCNT1 and C-SWCNT10 were significantly different from that of
382
the control. The above analysis suggested that C-SWCNT exerted a stronger influence
383
on the algal metabolic profile compared with GO.
384
The results shown in Figure 2a suggest that the level of ROS is a sensitive indicator
385
of GO and C-SWCNT cytotoxicity. To further examine the relationships between
386
ROS and metabolic disturbance, OPLS-DA modeling was conducted using ROS as a
387
Y variable and metabolites as X variables. As shown in Figures 3 and S10, 13 of the
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
388
66 metabolites, labeled with “+”, exhibited a positive coefficient CS (CoeffCS),
389
indicating that these metabolites make positive contributions to the generation of
390
ROS. The remaining 53 metabolites, labeled with “-”, make negative contributions to
391
the generation of ROS. The VIP (variable importance in the projection) plot in Figure
392
S11 summarizes the contributions of the X variables (metabolites) to the Y variable
393
(ROS). The metabolites labeled with a red “+” in Figure 3, including butylated
394
hydroxytoluene, alkane, lysine and propanoic acid, exhibited VIP values greater than
395
1 and made significant positive contributions to ROS generation. The metabolites
396
labeled with a red “-” in Figure 3, including octadecadienoic acid, aspartic acid,
397
valine, butanedioic acid, isoleucine and linolenic acid, showed VIP values greater
398
than 1.5 and made significant negative contributions to ROS generation. The high-
399
VIP metabolites could be considered new biomarkers of ROS levels in future studies.
400
ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test showed that the metabolic profiles of the
401
GO10, C-SWCNT0.1, C-SWCNT1 and C-SWCNT10 groups were significantly
402
different from that of the control group. Metabolites that were upregulated or
403
downregulated in the four exposure groups compared with the control group are
404
denoted as blue (GO) and red (C-SWCNT) arrows in Figure 4. Both GO and C-
405
SWCNT reduced the levels of most fatty acids, urea, amino acids and small molecule
406
acids. It has been suggested that the downregulation of amino acid metabolism is
407
associated with the enhancement of oxidative stress.40,41 The downregulation of
408
glycine, serine and valine is consistent with the results shown in Figure 2a at the
409
metabolic level. The metabolic decrease in unsaturated fatty acids is associated with
410
the deterioration of membrane fluidity and osmotic stress;42 thus, in our study, it is
411
likely that plasmolysis was enhanced and cell viability was reduced, as shown in
412
Figures 1a–c and S8. Inositol is also an important compound in the cell membrane.
413
The levels of inositol increased and decreased in the GO and C-SWCNT groups,
414
respectively, which is consistent with the enhanced plasmolysis and the decreased cell
415
viability in C-SWCNT-exposed cells. With the exception of lysine, all components of
416
the urea cycle were inhibited by GO and C-SWCNT. As a result, the biosynthesis of
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 14 of 28
Page 15 of 28
Environmental Science & Technology
417
relevant amino acids and other nitrogen-containing compounds associated with cell
418
division could be affected, as shown in Figure S6b.43
419
As shown in Figure S6, C-SWCNT stimulate cell growth at earlier stages, and this
420
is especially obvious at 48 h. A similar phenomenon has been reported for TiO2
421
nanoparticles; however, the relevant mechanisms are unclear.44 To examine the
422
nanotoxicology and possible mechanisms of action of GO and C-SWCNT, oxidative
423
stress (ROS level) and metabolism were investigated at 48 h, as shown in Figures S12
424
and S13. At 1 and 10 mg/L, both GO and C-SWCNT significantly increased the levels
425
of ROS in algal cells, while both nanomaterials, especially C-SWCNT, stimulated cell
426
growth. These results imply that other toxicity mechanisms might exist. Secondary
427
metabolites not only counteract environmental stresses but are also part of normal
428
growth and developmental processes.45 Fatty acids have an antioxidant capacity that is
429
attributed to their electron donating ability.46 The levels of secondary metabolites
430
(coronene and lanostane) and fatty acids (hexadecanoic acid) are increased by
431
nanomaterials, especially C-SWCNT, which likely played roles in the stimulation of
432
cell growth.
433
Metabolomics can provide insights into genotypic and environmental effects.47,48
434
The primary objective of metabolic analysis is to identify differences in metabolites,
435
establish relationships between metabolic alterations and biological responses, and
436
discover the underlying metabolic mechanisms of biological responses.49 However,
437
relevant information is rare in the literature. In the present work, we used a
438
metabolomics strategy to evaluate the cytotoxicity of nanoparticles, screen new
439
biomarkers of nanotoxicity, and understand the underlying molecular mechanisms of
440
nanotoxicology.
441 442 443 444 445 446
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
447
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
448
Supporting Information
449
Composition of BG-11 medium (Table S1), metabolites of C. vulgaris (Tables S2 and
450
S3), nanomaterial characterization (Figures S1-S5), algal reproduction (Figure S6),
451
cellular surface modifications (Figure S7 and S8), cell viability (Figure S9) and
452
metabolic analysis (Figure S10 and S13). This information is available free of charge
453
via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org/.
454 455
AUTHOR INFORMATION
456
Corresponding author
457
* E-mail:
[email protected] (Q.Z). Telephone: +86-022-23507800; fax: +86-
458
022-66229562.
459 460
Notes
461
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
462 463
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
464
This work was financially supported by the Ministry of Education of China as an
465
innovative team project (grant no. IRT 13024), the National Natural Science
466
Foundation of China (grant nos. 31170473, 21037002, 21307061 and 21407085), the
467
Tianjin Natural Science Foundation (grant no. 14JCQNJC08900), the Specialized
468
Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China (grant no.
469
2013003112016) and the Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China (grant no.
470
2014M550138).
471 472
REFERENCES
473
(1) Novoselov, K. S.; Fal'ko, V. I.; Colombo, L.; Gellert, P. R.; Schwab, M. G.; Kim,
474
K. A roadmap for graphene. Nature 2012, 490, 192-200.
475
(2) De Volder, M. F. L.; Tawfick, S. H.; Baughman, R. H.; Hart, A. J. Carbon
476
nanotubes: Present and future commercial applications. Science 2013, 339, 535-539.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 16 of 28
Page 17 of 28
Environmental Science & Technology
477
(3) Jariwala, D.; Sangwan, V. K.; Lauhon, L. J.; Marks, T. J.; Hersam, M. C. Carbon
478
nanomaterials for electronics, optoelectronics, photovoltaics, and sensing. Chem. Soc.
479
Rev. 2013, 42, 2824-2860.
480
(4) Chen, C.-Y.; Jafvert, C. T. Photoreactivity of carboxylated single-walled carbon
481
nanotubes in sunlight: Reactive oxygen species production in water. Environ. Sci.
482
Technol. 2010, 44, 6674-6679.
483
(5) Qu, X.; Alvarez, P. J. J.; Li, Q. Photochemical transformation of carboxylated
484
multiwalled carbon nanotubes: Role of reactive oxygen species. Environ. Sci.
485
Technol. 2013, 47, 14080-14088.
486
(6) Hu, X.; Zhou, Q. Novel hydrated graphene ribbon unexpectedly promotes aged
487
seed germination and root differentiation. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 3782.
488
(7) Schwab, F.; Bucheli, T. D.; Lukhele, L. P.; Magrez, A.; Nowack, B.; Sigg, L.;
489
Knauer, K. Are carbon nanotube effects on green algae caused by shading and
490
agglomeration? Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 6136-6144.
491
(8) Miralles, P.; Church, T. L.; Harris, A. T. Toxicity, uptake, and translocation of
492
engineered nanomaterials in vascular plants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 9224-
493
9239.
494
(9) Chen, R.; Ratnikova, T. A.; Stone, M. B.; Lin, S.; Lard, M.; Huang, G.; Hudson,
495
J. S.; Ke, P. C. Differential uptake of carbon nanoparticles by plant and mammalian
496
cells. Small 2010, 6, 612-617.
497
(10) Kurepa, J.; Paunesku, T.; Vogt, S.; Arora, H.; Rabatic, B. M.; Lu, J.; Wanzer, M.
498
B.; Woloschak, G. E.; Smalle, J. A. Uptake and distribution of ultrasmall anatase TiO2
499
Alizarin red S nanoconjugates in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 2296-
500
2302.
501
(11) Khodakovskaya, M. V.; de Silva, K.; Nedosekin, D. A.; Dervishi, E.; Biris, A.
502
S.; Shashkov, E. V.; Galanzha, E. I.; Zharov, V. P. Complex genetic, photothermal,
503
and photoacoustic analysis of nanoparticleplant interactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
504
U.S.A. 2011, 108, 1028-1033.
505
(12) Carpita, N.; Sabularse, D.; Montezinos, D.; Delmer, D. P. Determination of the
506
pore size of cell walls of living plant cells. Science 1979, 205, 1144-1147.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
507
(13) Zhao, L.; Peng, B.; Hernandez-Viezcas, J. A.; Rico, C.; Sun, Y.; Peralta-Videa,
508
J. R.; Tang, X.; Niu, G.; Jin, L.; Varela-Ramirez, A.; Zhang, J.-Y.; Gardea-Torresdey,
509
J. L. Stress response and tolerance of zea mays to CeO2 nanoparticles: Cross talk
510
among H2O2, heat shock protein, and lipid peroxidation. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 9615-
511
9622.
512
(14) Bour, A.; Mouchet, F.; Silvestre, J.; Gauthier, L.; Pinelli, E. Environmentally
513
relevant approaches to assess nanoparticles ecotoxicity: A review. J. Hazard. Mater.
514
2015, 283, 764-777.
515
(15) Poulson-Ellestad, K. L.; Jones, C. M.; Roy, J.; Viant, M. R.; Fernandez, F. M.;
516
Kubanek, J.; Nunn, B. L. Metabolomics and proteomics reveal impacts of chemically
517
mediated competition on marine plankton. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2014, 111,
518
12568-12568.
519
(16) Baker, M. Metabolomics: From small molecules to big ideas. Nat. Methods
520
2011, 8, 117-121.
521
(17) Bellaire, A.; Ischebeck, T.; Staedler, Y.; Weinhaeuser, I.; Mair, A.;
522
Parameswaran, S.; Ito, T.; Schonenberger, J.; Weckwerth, W. Metabolism and
523
development - integration of micro computed tomography data and metabolite
524
profiling reveals metabolic reprogramming from floral initiation to silique
525
development. New Phytol. 2014, 202, 322-335.
526
(18) Hu, X.; Zhou, Q. Health and ecosystem risks of graphene. Chem. Rev. 2013,
527
113, 3815-3835.
528
(19) Begurn, P.; Ikhtiari, R.; Fugetsu, B. Graphene phytotoxicity in the seedling stage
529
of cabbage, tomato, red spinach, and lettuce. Carbon 2011, 49, 3907-3919.
530
(20) Hu, X.; Kang, J.; Lu, K.; Zhou, R.; Mu, L.; Zhou, Q. Graphene oxide amplifies
531
the phytotoxicity of arsenic in wheat. Scientific Reports 2014, 4, 6122.
532
(21) Holt, B. D.; Dahl, K. N.; Islam, M. F. Cells take up and recover from protein-
533
stabilized single-wall carbon nanotubes with two distinct rates. ACS Nano 2012, 6,
534
3481-3490.
535
(22) Drescher, D.; Kneipp, J. Nanomaterials in complex biological systems: insights
536
from Raman spectroscopy. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 5780-5799.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 18 of 28
Page 19 of 28
Environmental Science & Technology
537
(23) Pumera, M.; Ambrosi, A.; Chng, E. L. K. Impurities in graphenes and carbon
538
nanotubes and their influence on the redox properties. Chem. Sci. 2012, 3, 3347-3355.
539
(24) Auffan, M.; Rose, J.; Wiesner, M. R.; Bottero, J.-Y. Chemical stability of
540
metallic nanoparticles: A parameter controlling their potential cellular toxicity in
541
vitro. Environ. Pollut. 2009, 157, 1127-1133.
542
(25) Yang, K.; Li, Y.; Tan, X.; Peng, R.; Liu, Z. Behavior and toxicity of graphene
543
and its functionalized derivatives in biological systems. Small 2013, 9, 1492-1503.
544
(26) George, S.; Lin, S.; Ji, Z.; Thomas, C. R.; Li, L.; Mecklenburg, M.; Meng, H.;
545
Wang, X.; Zhang, H.; Xia, T. Surface defects on plate-shaped silver nanoparticles
546
contribute to its hazard potential in a fish gill cell line and zebrafish embryos. ACS
547
Nano 2012, 6, 3745-3759.
548
(27) Qiu, Y.; Wang, Z.; Owens, A. C. E.; Kulaots, I.; Chen, Y.; Kane, A. B.; Hurt, R.
549
H. Antioxidant chemistry of graphene-based materials and its role in oxidation
550
protection technology. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 11744-11755.
551
(28) Hu X, Mu L, Kang J, Lu, K.; Zhou, R.; Zhou, Q. Humic acid acts as a natural
552
antidote of graphene by regulating nanomaterial translocation and metabolic fluxes in
553
vivo. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48, 6919-6927.
554
(29) Luo, C.; Li, Y.; Yang, L.; Wang, X.; Long, J.; Liu, J. Superparamagnetic iron
555
oxide nanoparticles exacerbate the risks of reactive oxygen species-mediated external
556
stresses. Arch Toxicol. 2015, 89, 357-369.
557
(30) Jiang, H.-S.; Qiu, X.-N.; Li, G.-B.; Li, W.; Yin, L.-Y. Silver nanoparticles
558
induced accumulation of reactive oxygen species and alteration of antioxidant systems
559
in the aquatic plant Spirodela polyrhiza. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2014, 33, 1398-
560
1405.
561
(31) Apul, O. G.; Wang, Q.; Zhou, Y.; Karanfil, T. Adsorption of aromatic organic
562
contaminants by graphene nanosheets: Comparison with carbon nanotubes and
563
activated carbon. Water Res. 2013, 47, 1648-1654.
564
(32) Zhu, M.; Nie, G.; Meng, H.; Xia, T.; Nel, A.; Zhao, Y. Physicochemical
565
Properties Determine Nanomaterial Cellular Uptake, Transport, and Fate. Accounts
566
Chem. Res. 2013, 46, 622-631.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
567
(33) Lelimousin, M.; Sansom, M. S. P. Membrane perturbation by carbon nanotube
568
insertion: Pathways to internalization. Small 2013, 9, 3639-3646.
569
(34) Perreault, F.; Popovic, R.; Dewez, D. Different toxicity mechanisms between
570
bare and polymer-coated copper oxide nanoparticles in Lemna gibba. Environ. Pollut.
571
2014, 185, 219-227.
572
(35) Stensberg, M. C.; Madangopal, R.; Yale, G.; Wei, Q.; Ochoa-Acuna, H.; Wei, A.;
573
McLamore, E. S.; Rickus, J.; Porterfield, D. M.; Sepulveda, M. S. Silver nanoparticle-
574
specific mitotoxicity in Daphnia magna. Nanotoxicology 2014, 8, 833-842.
575
(36) Rouquie, D.; Heneweer, M.; Botham, J.; Ketelslegers, H.; Markell, L.; Pfister,
576
T.; Steiling, W.; Strauss, V.; Hennes, C. Contribution of new technologies to
577
characterization and prediction of adverse effects. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 2015, 45, 172-
578
183.
579
(37) Bianco A. Graphene: safe or toxic? The two faces of the medal. Angew. Chem.
580
Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 4986–97.
581
(38) Richter, J. A.; Erban, A.; Kopka, J.; Zoerb, C. Metabolic contribution to salt
582
stress in two maize hybrids with contrasting resistance. Plant Sci. 2015, 233, 107-115.
583
(39) Beckonert, O.; Coen, M.; Keun, H. C.; Wang, Y.; Ebbels, T. M. D.; Holmes, E.;
584
Lindon, J. C.; Nicholson, J. K. High-resolution magic-angle-spinning NMR
585
spectroscopy for metabolic profiling of intact tissues. Nat. Protoc. 2010, 5, 1019-
586
1032.
587
(40) Amorini, A. M.; Lazzarino, G.; Galvano, F.; Fazzina, G.; Tavazzi, B.; Galvano,
588
G. Cyanidin-3-O-beta-glucopyranoside protects myocardium and erythrocytes from
589
oxygen radical-mediated damages. Free Radical Res. 2003, 37, 453–60.
590
(41) Zhang, W.; Tan, N. G. J.; Fu, B.; Li, S. F. Y. Metallomics and NMR-based
591
metabolomics of Chlorella sp reveal the synergistic role of copper and cadmium in
592
multi-metal toxicity and oxidative stress. Metallomics 2015, 7, 426-438.
593
(42) Velly, H.; Bouix, M.; Passot, S.; Penicaud, C.; Beinsteiner, H.; Ghorbal, S.;
594
Lieben, P.; Fonseca, F. Cyclopropanation of unsaturated fatty acids and membrane
595
rigidification improve the freeze-drying resistance of Lactococcus lactis subsp lactis
596
TOMSC161. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 99, 907-918.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 20 of 28
Page 21 of 28
Environmental Science & Technology
597
(43) Foflonker, F.; Price, D. C.; Qiu, H.; Palenik, B.; Wang, S.; Bhattacharya, D.
598
Genome of the halotolerant green alga Picochlorum sp reveals strategies for thriving
599
under fluctuating environmental conditions. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 17, 412-426.
600
(44) Lin, D.; Ji, J.; Long, Z.; Yang, K.; Wu, F. The influence of dissolved and surface-
601
bound humic acid on the toxicity of TiO2 nanoparticles to Chlorella sp. Water Res.
602
2012, 46, 4477-4487.
603
(45) Park, S.-Y.; Lim, S.-H.; Ha, S.-H.; Yeo, Y.; Park, W. T.; Kwon, D. Y.; Park, S.
604
U.; Kim, J. K. Metabolite profiling approach reveals the interface of primary and
605
secondary metabolism in colored cauliflowers (Brassica oleracea L. ssp botrytis). J.
606
Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 6999-7007.
607
(46) Huang, H. L., Wang, B. G. Antioxidant capacity and lipophilic content of
608
seaweeds collected from the Qingdao coastline. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 52, 4993-
609
4997.
610
(47) Clayton, T. A.; Lindon, J. C.; Cloarec, O.; Antti, H.; Charuel, C.; Hanton, G.;
611
Provost, J. P.; Le Net, J. L.; Baker, D.; Walley, R. J.; Everett, J. R.; Nicholson, J. K.
612
Pharmaco-metabonomic phenotyping and personalized drug treatment. Nature 2006,
613
440, 1073-1077.
614
(48) Holmes, E.; Wilson, I. D.; Nicholson, J. K. Metabolic phenotyping in health and
615
disease. Cell 2008, 134, 714-717.
616
(49) Shim, W.; Paik, M. J.; Duc-Toan, N.; Lee, J.-K.; Lee, Y.; Kim, J.-H.; Shin, E.-H.;
617
Kang, J. S.; Jung, H.-S.; Choi, S.; Park, S.; Shim, J. S.; Lee, G. Analysis of changes in
618
gene expression and metabolic profiles induced by silica-coated magnetic
619
nanoparticles. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 7665-7680.
620 621 622 623 624 625 626
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
627
Figure Legends
628
Figure 1. Damage to the cellular ultrastructure and uptake of nanomaterials at 96 h.
629
Transmission electron microscopy images (a–c) and Raman spectra (d). a, Algal cells
630
that were not exposed to nanomaterials; b, algal cells exposed to GO at 10 mg/L; c,
631
algal cells exposed to C-SWCNT at 10 mg/L. The red double arrows denote
632
plasmolysis. The green and yellow arrows denote C-SWCNT located outside and
633
inside the plasma membrane, respectively. The scale bars in a–c are 1 μm. Cw, cell
634
wall; Pm, plasma membrane; N, nucleus; Chl, chloroplast; S, starch grain; Thy,
635
thylakoid; L, lysosome; Pc, pyrenoid center; Psp, pyrenoid starch plate. In the Raman
636
spectra, St represents nanomaterials spiked in the algal matrix for the preparation of
637
standard curves. Sa represents nanomaterials in the sample.
638 639
Figure 2. Oxidative stress of cells exposed to nanomaterials at 96 h. a, Relative levels
640
of reactive oxygen species (ROS) detected using 2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein
641
diacetate (DCFH-DA) staining; b, relative levels of superoxide dismutase (SOD)
642
activity; c, concentrations of chlorophyll a; d–g, mitochondrial membrane potential
643
loss analyzed by fluorescence microscopy; d, control; e, cells exposed to GO at 10
644
mg/L; f, cells exposed to C-SWCNT at 10 mg/L; f, red to green fluorescence intensity
645
ratios for nanomaterials at 10 mg/L. The black and red asterisks denote significant
646
differences at p < 0.05 (n = 3, indicates three independent sample replicates)
647
compared with the control and GO groups, respectively.
648 649
Figure 3. Metabolic analysis of algal cells exposed to graphene oxide (GO) and
650
single-walled carbon nanotubes (C-SWCNT) at 96 h. The heat map of the metabolites
651
represents the relative levels of metabolites, and cluster analysis of the metabolites
652
was conducted using the hierarchical clustering (HCL) model. The asterisks represent
653
significant differences (P < 0.05) compared with the control. “+” and “−” indicate the
654
positive and negative correlations of metabolites with ROS levels, respectively, using
655
OPLS-DA model analysis. The metabolites indicated with red “+” and “−” have VIP
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 22 of 28
Page 23 of 28
Environmental Science & Technology
656
values greater than 1 and 1.5, respectively. OPLS-DA, orthogonal partial least squares
657
discriminant analysis; VIP, variable importance in the projection.
658 659
Figure 4. Effects of graphene oxide (GO) and single-walled carbon nanotubes (C-
660
SWCNT) on the main metabolic pathways of algal cells at 96 h. The metabolic
661
alterations labeled with blue and red arrows were determined based on comparisons of
662
the experimental groups (GO10, C-SWCNT0.1, C-SWCNT1 and C-SWCNT10) with
663
the control. The metabolic profiles of GO10, C-SWCNT0.1, C-SWCNT1 and C-
664
SWCNT10 were significantly different from the control group. The directions of the
665
blue (GO) and red (C-SWCNT) arrows represent the upregulation or downregulation
666
of the metabolites compared with the control. The black solid and dotted arrows
667
represent direct and indirect reactions, respectively.
668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Figures
686 687
688 689
Figure 1.
690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 24 of 28
Page 25 of 28
Environmental Science & Technology
704
705 706
Figure 2.
707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
725 100000
1700000
﹡﹡ ﹡﹡
Control GO0.01 C-SWCNT0.1 GO0.1 GO1 GO10 C-SWCNT0.1 C-SWCNT1 C-SWCNT10
0
-
+ + + + + + + + + + + + +
726 727
Figure 3.
728
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 26 of 28
Page 27 of 28
Environmental Science & Technology
729 730
Figure 4.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 28 of 28
Graphene oxide Oxidized carbon nanotube
Phytotoxicity Balance
ACS Paragon Plus Environment