Effects of Solvents on Graft Copolymerization of Styrene with

Grafting reaction took place by addition of methanol in any proportion to styrene monomer ..... ed at 161st ACS National Meeting, Los Angels, March to...
1 downloads 0 Views 1MB Size
21 Effects of Solvents on Graft Copolymerization of Styrene withγ-IrradiatedCellulose

Downloaded via UNIV OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA on July 16, 2018 at 21:23:12 (UTC). See https://pubs.acs.org/sharingguidelines for options on how to legitimately share published articles.

YOSHIO NAKAMURA and MACHIKO SHIMADA Faculty of Technology, Gunma University, Kiryu, Gunma 376, Japan

Considerable works have been done on radiation-induced graft copolymerization of v i n y l monomers onto cellulose during past years. As many of them aimed the formation of graft copolymers with unique properties, few studies have been made on solvents effects for graft copolymerization. Sakurada et at (1 -5) have shown that the addition of small amount of water to reaction system markedly enhanced radiation-induced graft copolymerization of v i n y l monomers onto cellulose. Since then, many swelling agents to cellulose were used to aid diffusion of monomers into c e l l u l o s i c fibers. D i l l i and Garnett (6-13) reported that methanol i s p a r t i c u l a r l y attractive for the observat i o n of the Trommsdorff effect i n radiation-induced grafting of v i n y l monomers onto c e l l u l o s e . From the reports mentioned above, graft copolymerization of v i n y l monomers onto irradiated cellulose is considered to be affected by the diffusion of monomers into fibers, the swelling of trunk polymer, and the Trommsdorff effect of solvent on graft polymer radicals. In this paper, these effects of solvents on graft copolymerization of styrene onto irradiated cellulose will be discussed by investigating systematically weight increase after graft copolymerization, extent of grafting of graft polystyrene bonded chemically with irradiated c e l l u l o s e , amount of cellulose reacted with styrene, graft efficiency, molecular weight of graft polymer, number of reaction sites of graft copolymerization, and decay of cellulose radicals i n reaction system. Experimental Materials. Scoured cotton cellulose of Egyptian variety was purified by extracting with hot benzene­ -ethanol mixture (1/1 volume ratio) for 24 hr and washing with distilled water prior to a i r - d r y i n g . 298

Arthur; Cellulose Chemistry and Technology ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1977.

21. NAKAMURA AND

SHiMADA

Graft Polymerization of Styrene

299

S t y r e n e was p u r i f i e d b y p a s s i n g t h e monomer t h r o u g h a c o l u m n f i l l e d up w i t h a c t i v a t e d a l m i n a t o remove i n h i b ­ itors of polymerization. M e t h a n o l was d i s t i l l e d b e f o r e u s e . O t h e r r e a g e n t s were r e a g e n t g r a d e , and were u s e d w i t h o u t f u r t h e r p u r i f i c a t i o n . Irradiation. A f t e r p u r i f i e d c e l l u l o s e was d r i e d u n d e r v a c u u m a t 50 C f o r 20 h r , i t was i r r a d i a t e d u n d e r n i t r o g e n a t m o s p h e r e f o r l g h r b y Co-60 / - r a y s w i t h a n e x p o s u r e r a t e o f 1.0 χ 10 R / h r , f o r g r a f t i n g r e a c t i o n . Degree o f S w e l l i n g . Diameters o f c e l l u l o s i c f i b e r s a n d p o l y s t y r e n e t a b l e t were measured w i t h a m i c r o s c o p e o f 800 m a g n i f i c a t i o n s b e f o r e a n d a f t e r i m ­ m e r s i o n i n v a r i o u s s o l v e n t s f o r 24 h r a t 30 C a n d averaged. D e g r e e o f s w e l l i n g ( D . S . ) was c a l c u l a t e d a s follows : D.S. = Da/Db

(a)

w h e r e Da s t a n d s f o r d i a m e t e r a f t e r i m m e r s i o n i n s o l v e n t a n d Db means d i a m e t e r b e f o r e i m m e r s i o n i n s o l v e n t . Graft Co-polymerization. Graft c o p o l y m e r i z a t i o n by s t y r e n e o n t o i r r a d i a t e d c e l l u l o s e was c a r r i e d o u t u n d e r n i t r o g e n a t m o s p h e r e a t 30 C. T h e l i q u o r r a t i o was 1 0 0 . A f t e r g r a f t c o p o l y m e r i z a t i o n , t h e samples were washed with methanol f o l l o w e d by washing with d i s t i l l e d water and a i r - d r y i n g . The samples were e x t r a c t e d w i t h h o t b e n z e n e t o remove homopolymer. The a p p a r e n t e x t e n t o f g r a f t i n g (A.E.G.) was d e t e r m i n e d a c c o r d i n g t o ( b ) : A.E.G. = (Wg-Wo)/Wo

(b)

w h e r e Wg d e s c r i b e s w e i g h t o f g r a f t c o p o l y m e r i z e d c e l ­ l u l o s e a f t e r t h e b e n z e n e e x t r a c t i o n , a n d Wo means weight o f c e l l u l o s e before g r a f t c o p o l y m e r i z a t i o n . Fractionation. I n order t o separate t h e apparent g r a f t samples i n t o t h r e e p a r t s , namely, u n g r a f t e d c e l ­ l u l o s e , i n s i d e homopolymer, and c h e m i c a l l y bonded g r a f t c o p o l y m e r , t h e samples were n i t r a t e d , o r a c e t y l a t e d . t h e p r o c e d u r e i s s h o w n i n F i g u r e 1. (i) Nitration. The g r a f t e d s a m p l e s w e r e n i t r a t e d a c c o r d i n g t o n o n d e g radative conditions reported by Alexander and M i t c h e l (14). To r e m o v e u n g r a f t e d c e l l u l o s e n i t r a t e s c o m p l e t e ­ l y , t h e n i t r a t e d samples were e x t r a c t e d w i t h h o t a c e ­ tone. After extraction, extracted cellulose nitrates w e r e w e i g h e d a n d t h e n i t r o g e n c o n t e n t was m e a s u r e d . The d e g r e e o f n i t r a t i o n was 2.4 p e r g l u c o s e " u n i t . T h e amount o f r e a c t e d c e l l u l o s e ( A . R . C . ) was c a l c u l a t e d a s follows : A.R.C. = ( 1 - W n / l . 6 7 ) / W o

(c)

Arthur; Cellulose Chemistry and Technology ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1977.

Arthur; Cellulose Chemistry and Technology ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1977.

Extraction^

Amount o f R e a c t e d Cellulose

Acetone Soluble Ungrafted Cellulose Nitrates

^Acetone

Apparent Graft Copolymer N i t r a t e d

Nitration

Graft

Figure 1.

Procedure of fractionation of apparent graft copolymer

True Extent of Grafting

Weight

Polystyrene j Molecular

Graft

£Hydrolysis

Benzenef I n s o l u b l e G r a f t Copolymer

Extraction

Benzene S o l u b l e I n s i d e Homopolymer

Benzene

Acetone I n s o l u b l e I n s i d e Homopolymer and Graft Copolymer

Extraction

Acetone Soluble Ungrafted Cellulose Acetates

Acetone

Apparent G r a f t Copolymer A c e t y l a t e d

Acetylation

Copolymer

Acetone I n s o l u b l e I n s i d e Homopolymer and G r a f t Copolymer_

Apparent

21.

NAKAMURA AND S H i M A D A

Graft

Polymerization

of

301

Styrene

w h e r e Wn means w e i g h t o f e x t r a c t e d c e l l u l o s e n i t r a t e s , (ii) Acetylation. A s s t y r e n e was a l s o n i t r a t e d a s c e l ­ l u l o s e , a c e t y l a t i o n was c a r r i e d o u t t o s e p a r a t e i n s i d e homopolymer and t r u e g r a f t copolymer from apparent graft copolymer. The a p p a r e n t g r a f t e d s a m p l e s were acetylated i nt h emixture of acetic anhydride, g l a c i a l a c e t i c a c i d , a n d z i n c c h l o r i d e f o r 48 h r a t 60 C (15)· The a c e t y l a t e d s a m p l e s w e r e e x t r a c t e d c o m p l e t e l y w i t h hot a c e t o n e t o remove - u n g r a f t e d c e l l u l o s e a c e t a t e s . A f t e r i n s o l u b l e p a r t i n a c e t o n e was w e i g h e d , i t was e x t r a c t e d b y h o t b e n z e n e t o remove homopolymer w h i c h was n o t e x t r a c t e d b y t h e f i r s t b e n z e n e e x t r a c t i o n because o f entanglement. The t r u e e x t e n t o f g r a f t i n g ( T . E . G . ) was d e s i d e d a s f o l l o w s : T.E.G. = (Wg~Wo-Wh)/Wo

(d)

w h e r e Wh s t a n d s f o r w e i g h t o f i n s i d e h o m o p o l y m e r . Measurement o f M o l e c u l a r Weight. After the ace­ t y l a t e d t r u e g r a f t c o p o l y m e r was d i s s o l v e d i n m e t h y l e n e c h l o r i d e , t h e same v o l u m e o f a c e t o n e was a d d e d t o t h e solution. T h e c o n c e n t r a t e d h y d r o c h l o r i c a c i d was a d d e d t i l l t h e c o n c e n t r a t i o n o f h y d r o c h l o r i c a c i d was 3 N, a n d t h e s o l u t i o n was p o r e d i n t o m e t h a n o l a n d p r e c i p i ­ t a t e d (JJL) · A f t e r t h e i s o l a t e d g r a f t p o l y s t y r e n e was p u r i f i e d , i t was d i s s o l v e d i n b e n z e n e a n d v i s c o s i t y a v e r a g e m o l e c u l a r w e i g h t was m e a s u r e d a c c o r d i n g t o ( e ) : Cn)= 2.4

x 10

β 4

0

Μ ·

6 5

(e)

Reaction Sites. Number o f r e a c t i o n s i t e s contributed t o grafting reaction i nirradiated c e l l u l o s i c f i b e r s was d e s i d e d a s f o l l o w s : N.R.S. = ( W t / M t ) / ( 1 0 0 / M c )

(N.R.S) 100 g

(f)

w h e r e Wt means t r u e e x t e n t o f g r a f t i n g e x p r e s s e d i n