Efficient Functionalization of Polyethylene Fibers for the Uranium

Subscriber access provided by UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT

Article

Efficient Functionalization of Polyethylene Fibers for the Uranium Extraction from Seawater through Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization Venkata S. Pavan K. Neti, Sadananda Das, Suree Brown, Christopher J. Janke, Li-Jung Kuo, Gary A. Gill, Sheng Dai, and Richard T Mayes Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.7b00482 • Publication Date (Web): 29 Aug 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on August 30, 2017

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 21

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research

Efficient Functionalization of Polyethylene Fibers for the Uranium Extraction from Seawater through Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization Venkata S. Neti,a Sadananda Das,a Suree Brown,b Christopher J. Janke,c Li-Jung Kuo,d Gary A. Gill,d Sheng Dai,a,b and Richard T. Mayes*a a

Chemical Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA Department of Chemistry, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA c Materials Science and Technology Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA d Marine Sciences Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Sequim, Washington, USA *[email protected] b

Brush-on-brush structures are proposed as one method to overcome support effects in grafted polymers. Utilizing glycidyl methacrylate (GMA) grafted on polyethylene (PE) fibers using radiation-induced graft polymerization (RIGP) provides a hydrophilic surface on the hydrophobic PE. When integrated with atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP), the grafting of acrylonitrile (AN) and hydroxyethyl acrylate (HEA) can be controlled and manipulated more easily than with RIGP. Poly(acrylonitrile)-co-poly(hydroxyethyl acrylate) chains were grown via ATRP on PE-GMA fibers to generate an adsorbent for the extraction of uranium from seawater. The prepared adsorbents in this study demonstrated promise (159.9 gU/kg of adsorbent) in laboratory screening tests using a high uranium concentration brine and 1.24 g-U/Kg of adsorbent in the filtered natural seawater in 21-days. The modest capacity in 21days exceeds previous efforts to generate brush-on-brush adsorbents by ATRP while manipulating the apparent surface hydrophilicity of the trunk material (PE).

Introduction Uranium is well-known of its use in nuclear power plants and as a radioactive contaminant in industrial waste and mining waters.1,2 Great efforts have been made in recent years to develop adsorbent materials for the separation of uranium from seawater.3-8 Despite the very low

ACS Paragon Plus Environment


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

concentration of uranium in seawater, 3.3 parts-per-billion, the extraction of uranium from seawater has had continued interest since the mid-1960’s. More recently researchers have focused on polyethylene (PE) fiber-based adsorbents to capture the uranium from oceans selectively due to its high strength and ease of functionalization.9-24 Covalent functionalization of uranium-coordinating organic ligands to the PE fibers provides opportunities to utilize these intriguing materials for uranium capture from seawater. Amidoxime containing polymers and polymer fibers have received the most interest in seawater uranium extractions due to the higher selectivity in the high ionic strength media with competing ions such as iron, vanadium, zinc, copper, etc.25 Functionalization of amidoxime groups to the PE fibers involves the attachment of nitrile groups, commonly via acrylonitrile, using radiation-induced graft polymerization (RIGP) or atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP). Adsorbents generated by RIGP suffer from low degrees of grafting, relative to ATRP-based adsorbents, and from side reactions involving radical termination limiting the number of nitrile groups available for conversion to amidoximes. The ATRP method is chemically versatile, minimizes nitrile-based radical termination mechanisms, and it is compatible with both aqueous and organic media. Moreover, it does not require the large capital expenditure involved in RIGP to generate the ionizing radiation.26-29 ATRP, however, is limited in the type of monomer that can be used, in that monomers that can coordinate copper will inhibit the polymerization. While each method has advantages and disadvantages, both still suffer from unwanted side reactions such as cyclization of adjacent nitrile groups. Furthermore, the necessary basic pre-treatment of amidoxime-based adsorbents induces hydrophilicity, but compromises the mechanical strength and degrades the amidoxime under prolonged reaction conditions.30 Therefore, developing an efficient method for surface engineering of amidoxime (AO) combined with other hydrophilic functional groups such as hydroxyethyl acrylate (HEA) is


Page 2 of 21

Page 3 of 21

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


of crucial importance for further advancement of this class of fascinating materials for uranium uptake. Yue, et al. reported the synthesis of copolymer monoliths prepared using a mesoporous ATRP initiator which were used to capture uranium from seawater.27 Similarly, Saito et al. used PE fibers that possess polymeric chains of the aromatic ATRP initiator, poly(vinylbenzyl chloride), to grow poly(acrylonitrile-block-tert-butyl acrylate) as an amidoxime precursor with high grafting yields.28 Brown, et al. later utilized PVC-co-CPVC fibers, sold commercially under the name Rhovyl®, to produce amidoxime-based adsorbents via ATRP.29 While this is the first nonPE fiber-based adsorbent generated by ATRP, it suffers from low mechanical strength. Due to this, PE retains the distinction as the polymer support of interest. The hydrophobicity of PE presents an interesting problem. Typical PE-based adsorbents are grafted with copolymers that transform into hydrogels during the required base pre-treatment. Therefore, a hydrogel is entrained within a hydrophobic matrix to extract the uranium from seawater. Grafting vinylbenzyl chloride onto PE, while an excellent ATRP initiator, does little to increase the hydrophilicity of the trunk. Therefore, a more hydrophilic ATRP initiator is needed to facilitate ion transport in the aqueous solution to the adsorbent chelation sites. Herein we report the effort to induce hydrophilicity in the support polymer through the grafting of a hydrophilic monomer onto PE prior to ATRP polymerization of acrylonitrile and 2hydroxyethylacrylate. Experimental Materials and Methods All chemicals were reagent grade or higher. Acrylonitrile (AN), glycidyl methacrylate (GMA), 2-hydroxyethyl acrylate (HEA), tetrahydrofuran (THF), α-bromoisobutyryl bromide (BIBB),



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

tris[2-(dimethylamino)ethyl]amine

(Me6TREN),

methanol,

dimethylsulfoxide

Page 4 of 21

(DMSO),

dimethylformamide (DMF), isopropanol (IPA), hydroxylamine hydrochloride (HA-HCl), sodium chloride (NaCl), and sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. Ultrapure water (18 MΩ cm-1, Thermo Scientific Nanopore) was used in the preparation of HAHCl and KOH solutions. High-surface-area polyethylene fibers (PE, hollow-gear) were prepared by bicomponent melt-spinning at Hills, Inc. (Melbourne, FL, USA), using polylactic acid (PLA) as the sacrificial sheath polymer for the hollow-gear shaped PE. Uranyl nitrate hexahydrate (UO2(NO3)2.6H2O, B&A Quality) was used to generate the laboratory screening brine while a 1000 ppm uranium (U) standard solution (High Purity Standards, North Charleston, USA) was used to prepare the inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) standards. Radiation-Induced Graft Polymerization (RIGP) The adsorbent fibers were prepared by RIGP at the NEO Beam Electron Beam Crosslinking Facility (Mercury Plastics, Middlefield, OH, USA). Before irradiation, the PLA was removed via a THF reflux, followed by drying at 40 °C under vacuum. Pre--weighed dry fiber samples were degassed under nitrogen and sealed inside double-layered plastic bags within a nitrogen atmosphere glove bag, and irradiated to a dose of 200 ± 10 kGy using 4.1 MeV electrons and 1.25 mA current from an RDI Dynamitron electron beam machine. The irradiated fibers were transferred to a nitrogen glove bag, stored under dry ice, and immersed in previously degassed grafting solutions consisting of GMA in DMSO and placed in an oven at 64 °C for 18 hours. The grafted fibers were washed with DMF and methanol to remove unreacted monomers and homopolymers and dried at 40 °C under vacuum. Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization (ATRP)


Page 5 of 21

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


The GMA-grafted PE fibers were contacted with dilute sulfuric acid to open the epoxide. The resulting hydroxylated GMA was then reacted with α-bromoisobutyryl bromide (BIBB) to introduce the bromide, which serves as the ATRP initiator. PE-GMA-BIBB fibers (75 mg), DMSO (10ml) HEA (7.8 mL), AN (6.4 ml), and Me6TREN (0.138g) were added to a round bottom flask equipped with a magnetic stir bar. The mixture was purged using N2 and then Cu(I)Br (10 mol%) was added to the flask under a N2 flow. The reaction was stirred slowly at 65 °C for 24 hr followed by quenching with air and water. The fibers were washed with DMSO and water and subsequently dried under vacuum at 40 °C overnight. The degree of grafting (d.g.) values were calculated from 100 times the ratio of the weight increase from grafting to the weight of PE-GMA-AN-HEA fibers. High d.g. ≥ 1900 % was obtained under the studied conditions. The d.g. values presented in subsequent tables are averaged values from two repeated experiments. Amidoximation of Grafted Acrylonitrile The PE-GMA-AN-HEA fibers were treated with 5 wt% hydroxylamine hydrochloride neutralized with KOH, for conversion into amidoxime (AO) groups. The hydroxylamine solution was prepared using DMSO. Sonication was utilized to facilitate dissolution of the KOH in DMSO. The amidoximation of PE-GMA-AN-HEA with hydroxylamine solution was carried out at 70 ᵒC and for 3h. The samples were then washed with deionized water followed by drying at 40 °C under vacuum. NaHCO3 Conditioning The PE-GMA-AO-HEA adsorbents were conditioned with 0.44M NaHCO3 at 70-80

C for 24

hrs before exposure to the screening brine solution as well as filtered seawater for determining the uranium uptake capacity.



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 6 of 21

Characterization Methods The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were collected using a JOEL, JSM-6060 SEM at 4 kV. The Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectra were recorded on a Perkin Elmer Frontier FTIR with a single bounce diamond attenuated total reflectance (ATR) accessory at 2 cm-1 resolution and averaged over 16 scans. The solid-state

13

C CP/MAS (cross-

polarization/magic angle spinning) nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) experiments were collected on a Varian Inova 400 MHz NMR spectrometer and referenced to an external standard (hexamethylbenzene) at 17.17 ppm. Screening with Uranyl Brine Batch screening experiments with high uranium concentration (8 ppm) brine were conducted to identify potential candidates for true seawater investigations. The sodium-based brine solution used for screening is used to mimic the pH (~8) sodium, chloride, and carbonate content of seawater. This is achieved by generating a brine that consists of 193 ppm sodium bicarbonate, 25,600 ppm sodium chloride, and 8 ppm uranium from uranyl nitrate hexahydrate, all of which are dissolved in deionized water (18.2 MΩ cm-1). A brine sample was collected before the addition of adsorbent to determine the initial uranium concentration. Each of the NaHCO3conditioned PE-GMA-AN-HEA adsorbents (~15 mg) were then contacted with 750 mL of uranyl brine solution for 24 hours at room temperature with constant shaking (400 rpm). After 24 hours of shaking, an aliquot was taken, and the initial and final solutions were analyzed using ICP-OES (Perkin Elmer Optima 2100DV ICP-OES). The uranium adsorption capacity was determined from the difference in uranium concentration in the solutions, using the following equation:


Page 7 of 21

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


− = × Soln. vol. (L)

The ICP-OES was calibrated using a linear calibration curve comprised from six standard uranium solutions with concentrations ranging from 0-10 ppm, which were prepared from 1000 ppm uranium in 5 wt % nitric acid stock solution. A blank solution of 2–3 wt % nitric acid was used to monitor between samples to ensure no carryover of uranium between sample analyses. A solution of 5 ppm yttrium in 2 wt % nitric acid was used as an internal standard to correct for matrix effects, which was prepared from 1000 ppm stock solution (High-Purity Standards, North Charleston, USA). Seawater Screening with Filtered Seawater The uranium adsorption capacities for the PE-GMA-AN-HEA adsorbents were carried out at the Marine Sciences Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) in Sequim, WA, USA for 21 days in flow-through columns using 0.45 µm filtered ambient seawater. The PEGMA-AN-HEA adsorbents (~50 mg each) were conditioned with 0.44 M NaHCO3 at 70-80 ºC for 24 h prior to seawater exposure. The base conditioned adsorbents were packed while wet into columns (1” diameter, 6” long). Pre-cleaned glass wool and 5 mm glass beads were used to hold the adsorbents in place within the column. Ambient seawater was pumped from Sequim Bay into holding tanks followed by successive filtration until achieving 0.45 µm filtration for the continuous-flow adsorption experiment. The temperature and flow rate were monitored using a flexible hermetically sealed RTD sensor (OMEGA Engineering, Stamford, CT, USA) and a turbine-style in-line flow sensor (Model DFS-2W, Digiflow Systems), respectively in 10-minute



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

intervals with a data logger. The temperature of the incoming seawater was maintained at 20 ± 1 ºC through the utilization of a constant temperature bath and the velocity of seawater in each column was controlled at ~ 2 cm/sec using a flow rate of 250 - 300 mL/min. During the flowthrough adsorption experiments, seawater salinity and pH were monitored daily using a handheld salinity meter (Model 30, YSI) and pH meter (Orion 3 STAR, Thermo). After 21 days of seawater exposure, the adsorbent columns were removed from the test system and rinsed with deionized water to remove residual salt. The adsorbents were removed from the columns and weighed after drying. The adsorbents loaded with metal ions were digested with a 50% aqua regia solution at 80 °C for 3 hours and diluted with de-ionized water to achieve the desired concentration range for IPC-OES analysis. Analysis of uranium and other trace elements in the solutions was carried out using a Perkin-Elmer Optima 5300DV ICP-OES, with quantification based on standard calibration curves.

Results and Discussion

Utilizing the glycidyl methacrylate (GMA) as a support for the ATRP initiator provides multiple advantages. First, grafting GMA potentially increases the hydrophilicity of the truck material, which potentially mitigates the hydrophobic nature of the PE in aqueous systems, such as seawater. This is due to the incorporation of the ester moity from the graft polymer. Secondly, opening the epoxide with the dilute sulfuric acid provides multiple attachment sites for the ATRP initiators while adding two additional ester functional groups per monomer in the process. Finally, GMA grafts well to PE, with high degrees of grafting (up to 2000 %) suggesting dense brush structures are possible. The graft process is illustrated in Scheme 1. Here, the PE is irradiated via electron beam with a 200 kGy dose followed by grafting with GMA. The GMA


Page 8 of 21

Page 9 of 21

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


epoxide is opened with dilute acid forming hydroxyl groups. The two hydroxyls on the GMA are reacted with the acid bromide functionality on α-bromoisobutyryl bromide (BIBB) in the presence of triethylamine in THF. Poly(acrylonitrile-co-2-hydroxyethylacrylate) is then grown under ATRP conditions with DMSO as the solvent. The choice of solvent is crucial for high degrees of grafting to ensure both the grafted polymer and monomer are soluble in the solvent. If the polymer is not soluble in the solvent, polymerization will be inhibited and a lower d. g. will be obtained. Optimization of the ATRP polymerization resulted in grafting yields of 1900 %, approximately 6 times higher than that found in RIGP-based polymerizations.

Scheme 1: Illustration of the grafting reactions involved in the brush-on-brush methodology. A single oligomer is drawn for clarity.



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

FTIR spectra of the PE-GMA, PE-GMA-AN/HEA, and the amidoxime-functionalized fibers are shown in Figure 1. The PE-GMA in DMSO exhibited the characteristic carbonyl group stretch at 1725 cm–1, along with the epoxy stretches at 1255 cm–1 and 905 cm–1 corresponding to the stretching vibration of ester groups and the bending vibration of epoxy groups, respectively. The broad peak centered at 3400 cm–1 in the spectrum of PE-GMA-OH is attributed to −OH stretching vibration, after ring opening of the epoxy groups. The new weak stretch of C-Br appeared at 668 cm–1 in PE-GMA-BIBB suggesting the installation of ATRP initiators to the surface of PE-GMA fibers through a nucleophilic substitution reaction between the acyl bromide groups and the hydroxyl groups. A new stretch indicative of nitrile groups at 2242 cm–1 in PEGMA-AN/HEA, confirmed the functionalization of nitrile groups through the ATRP reaction. After amidoximation, the -CN stretch of PE-GMA-AN-HEA fibers at 2242 cm–1 disappeared and the carbonyl stretch shifted from 1719 to 1700 cm–1, which agrees with the NMR chemical shift values. The presence of C═N, C–N, and N–O stretches at 1642, 1391, and 931 cm–1, respectively, confirmed the formation of amidoxime functional groups. Also, during amidoximation, some -COOH groups formed because of hydrolysis of the HEA esters (1556 cm– 1

) and a new band at 929 cm–1 corresponding to the N–O stretching vibration, indicative of the

amidoxime formation. It is also worth mentioning that absence of homopolymerization of nitrile groups i.e. polyacrylonitrile onto ATRP initiators was confirmed by the presence of -OH groups of HEA in the FT-IR spectra.


Page 10 of 21

Page 11 of 21

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


Figure 1. FT-IR spectra of PE-GMA, PE-GMA-OH, PE-GMA-BIBB, PE-GMA-AN/HEA, AND PE-GMA-AO/HEA. Carbon-13 cross-polarization solid-state NMR (CP/MAS NMR) was used to understand the chemical constituents on the adsorbent to gain insight into the sites present. The

13

C CP/MAS

NMR characterization of hollow gear PE-GMA fibers (Figure 2) indicated similar signals for those shown in the AF-series of adsorbents published by Das et al.25 After amidoximation, signals at ~149 ppm and a broad peak at ~157 ppm can be assigned to the oxime carbons in the cyclic backbone and the iminic carbons of amidoxime. This indicates similarly the cyclization of adjacent amidoxime groups with elimination of ammonia (NH3). The lack of a nitrile peak at ~120 ppm indicates the complete conversion of nitrile to amidoxime.



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Figure 2. 13C CP/MAS NMR spectra of PE-GMA-AO/HEA.

Upon grafting the fibers became very brittle. Due to this, whole, dry fibers were unobtainable for SEM imaging. While wet, the fibers were still flexible and did not break as easily yet, while dry, the fibers readily broke upon touch. This brittleness is attributed to the high degrees of grafting achieved. The SEM images of the RIGP-grafted and ATRP-grafted fibers are shown in Figure 3. The initial diameter of the PE-GMA fibers is 30 µm, while after grafting of AN/HEA it increased to ~70-80 µm. The surface of the fiber, specifically on the outer surface of the wings, appears to be rougher than the pre-ATRP grafted fiber. The surface roughness is attributed to surface grafts of the AN/HEA polymer. This is contrary to the fibers produced by RIGP where little surface roughness is observed. This difference could influence the base conditioning requirements allowing for milder base contact to facilitate capacity enhancements.


Page 12 of 21

Page 13 of 21

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


Figure 3. Scanning Electron Microscope image of PE-GMA (left) and the PE-GMA-AN/HEA (right) fibers.

The laboratory batch pre-screening of the adsorbents illustrates fundamental differences between traditional RIGP and the brush-on-brush ATRP adsorbents reported herein. In the traditional adsorbents, an aqueous 0.44 M KOH solution is utilized to pre-treat, i.e. “condition,” the adsorbent prior to contacting a uranium-containing solution. The reasons for this pretreatment are currently not fully understood, however, it can be equated to hydrogel formation and stretching of the polyethylene trunk. In the case of the ATRP-based adsorbents grown from a GMA brush, a strong base pretreatment will cleave the ester resulting in no functionality present to sequester the uranium. Indeed, this occurred when the ATRP-based adsorbents were contacted with 0.44 M KOH at 80 oC for 1 hr. This led to the development of a more facile pretreatment process. No base conditioning resulted in no capacity within the high uranyl brine solution suggesting the need still exists for a basic pretreatment. Therefore, sodium bicarbonate was chosen, representing a weak base, to pretreat the adsorbent while not cleaving the ester. Traditional times for base pretreatment were initially chosen. After one hour of base pretreatment in 0.44 M NaHCO3 at 80 oC, the capacity was negligible (10 g-U/kg-ads) in the



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

laboratory screening brine. Lengthening the time did not result in significant uranium capacity until 24 hrs at 80 oC contact time. At this point, the 400 % d. g. sample exhibited 123 g-U/kgads. capacity and the 1900 % d. g. adsorbent exhibited a capacity of 165 g-U/kg-ads. This difference illustrates the difference in the d. g. as well. The lower d. g. adsorbent is expected to exhibit a lowered uranium capacity, which was observed. The d. g. is not proportional to the uranium capacity however, as the nearly 5-fold increase in the d. g. only resulted in a 1.3-fold increase in capacity. However, this value is in accordance with previously reported values for the AF-series of adsorbents.25 Uranium adsorption by amidoximes are pH dependent. Therefore, the 400 % d. g. adsorbent was screened at various pH values to determine the extraction effectiveness. The maximum adsorption occurred at pH = 6 with a capacity of 160 g-U/kg-ads. (Figure 4). At pH = 8, the 123 g-U/kg-ads. is comparable to the 160 g-U/kg-ads. suggesting this would be a good candidate for seawater screening. It is interesting to note the high adsorption capacity at pH = 4, suggesting a potentially broader application for the adsorbent in acidic media.

Figure 4 Uranium uptake properties of PE-GMA-AN-HEA fibers with a d.g = 400 % at different pH values in a brine consisting of 8 ppm U with the pH adjusted by NaHCO3 or HCl.


Page 14 of 21

Page 15 of 21

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


Seawater screening at a marine site ultimately determines the efficacy of an adsorbent. The Marine Sciences Laboratory of the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory determined the adsorbent capacity with 0.45 µm-filtered seawater. All initial marine testing was conducted with adsorbents that received 70 oC base pretreatment. This base conditioning was optimal in the high uranyl concentration brine and therefore was expected to translate to seawater testing. However, this was not the case, as the 70 oC pretreatment for 24 hrs did not result in appreciable capacity in 21-days of seawater contact. This illustrates the need for actual seawater testing and not reliance on simulated seawater brine for efficacy determinations. Repeating the experiment after pretreatment at 80 oC for 24 hrs resulted in an appreciable seawater capacity, 1.24 g-U/kg-ads. (average of duplicate samples) after 21-days of seawater contact. This capacity is lower than the recently reported ATRP-based adsorbents from PVC-co-CPVC trunks29 where AN and HEA are copolymerized randomly via ATRP onto the chlorinated trunk. The capacity observed in 21-days is, however, comparable to that observed by Saito, et al. from the block copolymer of AN-b-tertbutyl acrylate polymerized from PE-grafted with vinylbenzyl chloride after 56-days of seawater contact. Figure 5 depicts the extraction capacity and selectivity for the predominant metals extracted from seawater, i.e. iron, vanadium, uranium, zinc, and copper. Calcium (0.30 mmol-Ca/kg-ads.) and magnesium (0.68 mmol-Mg/kg-ads.) are omitted from the figure for clarity as these two metals are major ions in seawater and dominate the ions released during acid elution. In this plot, the selectivity (red squares) is defined as the mmol of metal extracted divided by the mmol of uranium extracted. It is important to note that while uranium is extracted at high values,



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 16 of 21

vanadium, iron, and zinc are extracted in higher amounts than the uranium resulting in uranium having a lowered selectivity relative to these metals.

Figure 5: Seawater capacity (mmol-M/kg-ads.) and selectivity toward uranium of the PE-GMAAO/HEA adsorbents. Conclusion Hollow gear polyethylene fibers were irradiated and grafted with glycidyl methacrylate. The glycidyl methacrylate increases the hydrophilicity of the polyethylene while serving as a support for an ATRP initiator. Upon opening the epoxide with dilute acid, the resultant hydroxyls were reacted with a-bromoisobutyryl bromide. The bromides on the surface serve as the ATRP initiators during polymerization of acrylonitrile and 2-hydroxyethylacrylate.

The glycidyl

methacrylate introduces an ester that is not base-stable, therefore the basic pre-treatment was modified from 0.44 M potassium hydroxide at 80 oC for 1 hour to 0.44 M sodium bicarbonate, 80 oC for 24 hours. Optimization of the bicarbonate pretreatment did not scale to seawater in that adjusting the temperature to 70 oC resulted in negligible capacity. The seawater screening after pretreatment at 80 oC for 24 hours resulted in a uranium capacity of 1.24 g-U/kg-ads. in 21-


Page 17 of 21

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


days. This value compares well to previous RIGP-ATRP hybrid brush-on-brush structures after 56-day contact. Therefore, the adsorbent hydrophilicity, in both the trunk polymer through GMA incorporation and in the choice of 2-hydroxyethylacrylate, results in enhanced uranium capacities from seawater. Acknowledgements This invited contribution is part of the I&EC Research special issue for the 2017 Class of Influential Researchers. This research was conducted at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) and the Marine Sciences Laboratory of Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL). The work was supported by the U. S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Nuclear Energy. This manuscript has been authored by UT-Battelle, LLC under Contract No. DE-AC05-00OR22725 with the U. S. Department of Energy. The United States Government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the United States Government retains a non-exclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for United States Government purposes. The Department of Energy will provide public access to these results of federally sponsored research in accordance with the DOE Public Access Plan (http://energy.gov/downloads/doe-publicaccess-plan).

References 1. Emsley, J. Nature’s Building Blocks: An A-Z Guide to the Elements, Oxford University Press, New York, 2nd Edition, 2011. 2. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Final environmental impact statement for standards for the control of byproduct materials from uranium ore processing. Washington, D.C., 1983, v. 1, pp. D-12, D-13.



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 18 of 21

3. Davies, R. V.; Kennedy, J.; McIlroy, R. W.; Spence, R.; Hill, K.M. Extraction of uranium from seawater. Nature, 1964, 203, 1110. 4. Kanno, M. Present status of study on extraction of uranium from seawater J. Nucl. Sci. Technol.. 1984, 21, 1. 5. Kuroda, R.; Oguma, K.; Mukai, N.; Iwamoto, M. Anion-exchange enrichment and spectrophotometric determination of uranium in seawater. Talanta, 1987, 34, 433. 6. Takeda, T.; Saito, K.; Uezu, K.; Furusaki, S.; Sugo, T.; Okamoto, J. Adsorption and elution in hollow-fiber-packed bed for recovery of uranium from seawater. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 1991, 30, 185. 7. Takahashi, A.; Ueki, Y.; Igarashi, S. Homgeneous liquid-liquid extraction of uranium(VI) from acetate aqueous solution. Anal. Chim. Acta., 1999, 387, 71. 8. Zhang, A.; Asakura, T.; Uchiyama, G. The adsorption mechanism of uranium(VI) from seawater on a macroporous fibrous polymeric adsorbent containing amidoxime chelating functional group. React. Funct. Polym., 2003, 57, 67. 9. Tong, J.; Ma, A.; Yunhai, A.; Arnell, R. D.; Ren, L. Free abrasive wear behaviour of UHMWPE composites filled with wollastonite fibers. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 2006, 37, 38. 10. Astheimer, L.; Schenk, H. J.; Witte, E. G.; Schwochau, K. Development of sorbers for the recovery of uranium from seawater. Part 2. The accumulation of uranium from seawater by resins containing amidoxime and imidoxime functional groups. Sep. Sci. Technol., 1983, 18, 307. 11. Prasad, T. L.; Saxena, A. K.; Tiwari, P. K.; Sathiyamoorthy, D. An engineering scale study on radiation grafting of polymeric adsorbents for recovery of heavy metal ions from seawater. Nucl. Eng. Technol., 2009, 41, 1101. 12. Rao, L. Recent international R&D activities in the extraction of uranium from seawater, Report LBNL-4034E, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA, March 15, 2010. 13. Abney, C. W.; Mayes, R. T.; Piechowicz, M.; Lin, Z.; Bryantsev, V.; Veith, G. M.; Dai, S.; Lin, W. XAFS investigation of polyamidoxime-bound uranyl contests the paradigm from small molecule studies. Energy Environ. Sci., 2016, 9, 448.


Page 19 of 21

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


14. Pan, H.-B.; Kuo, L.-J.; Wai, C. M.; Miyamoto, N.; Joshi, R.; Wood, J. R.; Strivens, J. E.; Janke, C. J.; Das, S.; Oyola, Y.; Mayes, R. T.; Gill, G. A. Elution of uranium and transition metals from amidoxime-based polymer adsorbents for sequestering uranium from seawater. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2016, 55, 4313. 15. Dietz, T. C.; Tomaszewski, C. E.; Tsinas, Z.; Poster, D.; Barkatt, A.; Adel-Hadadi, M.; Bateman, F. B.; Cumberland, L. T.; Schneider, E.; Gaskell, K.; LaVerne, J.; Al-Sheikhly, M. Uranium removal from seawater by means of polyamide 6 fibers directly grafted with diallyl oxalate through a single-step, solvent-free irradiation process. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2016, 55, 4179. 16. Alexandratos, S. D.; Zhu, X.; Florent, M.; Sellin, R. Polymer-supported bifunctional amidoximes for the sorption of uranium from seawater. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2016, 55, 4208. 17. Piechowicz, M.; Abney, C. W.; Zhou, X.; Thacker, N. C.; Li, Z.; Lin, W. Design, synthesis, and characterization of a bifunctional chelator with ultrahigh capacity for uranium uptake from seawater simulant. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2016, 55, 4170. 18. Kelley, S. P.; Barber, P. S.; Mullins, P. H.; Rogers, R. D. Structural clues to UO22+/VO2+ competition in seawater extraction using amidoxime-based extractants. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 12504. 19. Parker, B. F.; Knight, A. S.; Vukovic, S.; Arnold, J.; Francis, M. B. A peptoid-based combinatorial and computational approach to developing ligands for uranyl sequestration from seawater. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2016, 55, 4183. 20. Liu, X.; Chen, H.; Wang, C.; Qu, R.; Ji, C.; Sun, C.; Zhang, Y. Synthesis of porous acrylonitrile/methyl acrylate copolymer beads by suspended emulsion polymerization and their adsorption properties after amidoximation. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 175, 1014. 21. Sahiner, N.; Pekel, N.; Guven, O. Radiation synthesis, characterization, and amidoximation of N-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone/acrylonitrile interpenetrating polymer networks. React. Funct. Polym. 1999, 39, 139. 22. Pantchev, I.; Farquet, P.; Surbeck, H.; Meyer, T. Surface modified Nylon 6,6 and application for adsorption and detection of uranium in potable water. React. Funct. Polym. 2007, 67, 127.



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 20 of 21

23. Okamoto, J.; Sugo, T.; Katakai, A.; Omichi, H. Amidoxime-group-containing adsorbents for metal ions synthesized by radiation-induced grafting. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1985, 30, 2967. 24. Saeed, K.; Haider, S.; Oh, T.-J.; Park, S.-Y. Preparation of amidoxime-modified polyacrylonitrile (PAN-oxime) nanofibers and their applications to metal ions adsorption. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 322, 400. 25. Das, S.; Oyola, Y.; Mayes, R. T.; Janke, C. J.; Kuo, L.-J.; Wood, J. R.; Gill, G. A.; Dai, S. Extracting uranium from seawater: promising AF series adsorbents. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2016, 55, 4110. 26. Wang, J.-S.; Matyjaszewski, K. Controlled “living” radical polymerization. Atom transfer radical polymerization in the presence of transition-metal complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 5614. 27. Yue, Y.; Mayes, R. T.; Kim, J.; Fulvio, P. F.; Sun, X.-G.; Tsouris, C.; Chen, J.; Brown, S.; Dai, S. Seawater uranium sorbents: preparation from a mesoporous polymer initiator by atom-transfer radical polymerization. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 13458. 28. Saito, T.; Brown, S.; Chatterjee, S.; Kim, J.; Tsouris, C.; Mayes, R. T.; Kuo, L.-J.; Gill, G.; Oyola, Y.; Janke, C. J.; Dai, S. Uranium recovery from seawater: development of fiber adsorbents prepared via atom-transfer radical polymerization. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2014, 2, 14674. 29. Brown, S.; Yue, Y.; Kuo, L.-J.; Mehio, N.; Li, M.; Gill, G.; Tsouris, C.; Mayes, R. T.; Saito, T.; Dai, S. Uranium adsorbent fibers prepared by atom-transfer radical polymerization from chlorinated polypropylene and polyethylene trunk fibers. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2016, 55, 4139. 30. Pan, H.-B.; Kuo, L.-J.; Wood, J.; Strivens, J.; Gill, G. A.; Janke, C. J.; Wai, C. M. Towards understanding KOH conditioning of amidoxime-based polymer adsorbents for sequestering uranium from seawater. RSC Advances. 2015, 5, 100715.


Page 21 of 21

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


TOC graphic and summary

A hydrophilic brush-on-brush adsorbent prepared through a combination of radiation-induced graft polymerization and atom transfer radical polymerization has been used to extract uranium from seawater.


Efficient Functionalization of Polyethylene Fibers for the Uranium

Recommend Documents